Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024//1421-0185.58.4.233

Yzerbyt, Rogier and Fiske (1998) argued that perceivers confronted with a group high in entitativity (i.e., a group perceived as an entity, a tight-knit group) more readily call upon an underlying essence to explain people's behavior than perceivers confronted with an aggregate. Their study showed that group entitativity promoted dispositional attributions for the behavior of group members. Moreover, stereotypes emerged when people faced entitative groups. In this study, we replicate and extend these results by providing further evidence that the process of social attribution is responsible for the emergence of stereotypes. We use the attitude attribution paradigm (Jones & Harris, 1967) and show that the correspondence bias is stronger for an entitative group target than for an aggregate. Besides, several dependent measures indicate that the target's group membership stands as a plausible causal factor to account for members' behavior, a process we call Social Attribution. Implications for current theories of stereotyping are discussed.

References

  • Allison, S. T. , Messick, D. M. (1985). The group attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 563– 579. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, M. B. , Weber, J. G. , Carini, B. (1995). Person memory in intergroup contexts: Categorization and individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 29– 40. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, M. B. , Harasty, A. S. (1996). Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. In R. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioural Sciences, 3, 14– 25. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cantor, N. , Pittman, T. S. , Jones, E. E. (1982). Choice and attitude attributions: The influence of constraint information on attributions across levels of generality. Social Cognition, 1, 1– 20. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Castano, E. , Yzerbyt, V. (submitted) We are one and we like it: The impact of ingroup entitativity on social identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Deschamps, J.-C. (1973-1974). L'attribution, la catégorisation sociale et les relations intergroupes. Bulletin de Psychologie, 27, 710– 721. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Deschamps, J.-C. (1977). L'attribution et la catégorisation sociale. Berne: Peter Lang. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Deschamps, J.-C. (1983). Social attribution. In J. Jaspars, F. Fincham & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, developmental and social dimensions. Londres: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Deschamps, J.-C. , Clémence, A. (1987). L'explication quotidienne. Perspectives psychosociologiques. Cousset: DelVal. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621– 628. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T. (1997). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gaertner, L. , Schopler, J. (1998). Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 963– 980. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Attribution. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gilbert, D. T. , Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21– 38. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilbert, D. T. , Osborne, R. E. (1989). Thinking backward: Some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 940– 949. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hamilton, D. L. (1991). Perceiving persons and groups: A social cognitive perspective. Address presented at the 99th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hamilton, D. L. , Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336– 355. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hamilton, D. L. , Sherman, S. J. , Lickel, B. (1998). Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler and C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hewstone, M. , Jaspars, J. (1982). Intergroup relations and attribution processes. In H. Tajfel, Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffman, C. , Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197– 208. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, E. E. , Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1– 24. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T. , Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false-consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1– 27. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levy, S. R. , Stroessner, S. J. , Dweck, C. S. (in press) Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leyens, J.-Ph. , Yzerbyt, V. Y , Schadron, G. (1994). Stereotypes and Social Cognition. London: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McConnell, A. R. , Sherman, S. J. , Hamilton, D. L. (1997). Target cohesiveness: Implications for information processing about individual and group targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 750– 762. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGarty, C. S. , Haslam, S. A. , Hutchinson, K. J. , Grace, D. M. (1995). Determinants of perceived consistency: The relationship between group entitativity and the meaningfulness of categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 237– 256. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469– 1481. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, D. T. , Prentice, D. A. (in press) Some consequences of a belief in group essence: The category divide hypothesis. In D. A. Prentice & D. T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and resolving group conflict. NY: Russell Sage Foundation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Moreland, R. L. (1987). The formation of small groups. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes: Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 80-110). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher & M. Wetherell, Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Oakes, P. J. , Turner, J. C. , Haslam, S. A. (1991). Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 125– 144. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461– 476. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rabbie, J. M. , Horwitz, M. (1988). Categories vs groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 117– 123. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ross, L. , Amabile, T. M. , Steinmetz, J. L. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485– 494. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rothbart, M. , Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds?. In G. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition ( 11-36). London: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schadron, G. , Morchain, P. , Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1996). Le rôle de la fonction explicative dans la genèse des stéréotypes. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 31, 11– 23. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Srull, T. K. (1981). Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 440– 463. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Srull, T. K. , Lichtenstein, M. , Rothbart, M. (1985). Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 316– 345. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. , Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup relations. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A. , Oakes, P. J. , Reicher, S. D. , Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self categorization theory. New York, NY, USA: Basil Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wilder, D. A. (1978). Perceiving persons as a group: Effects on attributions of causality and beliefs. Social-Psychology, 41, 13– 23. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yzerbyt, V. Y. , Rocher, S. J. , Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & A. Haslam (Eds.), The psychology of stereotyping and group life. London: Basil Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yzerbyt, V. Y , Rogier, A. , Fiske, S. (1998). Group entitativity and social attribution: On translating situational constraints into stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1090– 1104. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yzerbyt, V. Y , Rogier, A. , Rocher, S. (in press) Blaming group membership: The role of subjective essentialism in the emergence of stereotypes. International Review of Social Psychology,. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar