Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online March 1, 2012

Can Stereotype Threat Explain the Gender Gap in Mathematics Performance and Achievement?

Abstract

Men and women score similarly in most areas of mathematics, but a gap favoring men is consistently found at the high end of performance. One explanation for this gap, stereotype threat, was first proposed by Spencer, Steele, and Quinn (1999) and has received much attention. We discuss merits and shortcomings of this study and review replication attempts. Only 55% of the articles with experimental designs that could have replicated the original results did so. But half of these were confounded by statistical adjustment of preexisting mathematics exam scores. Of the unconfounded experiments, only 30% replicated the original. A meta-analysis of these effects confirmed that only the group of studies with adjusted mathematics scores displayed the stereotype threat effect. We conclude that although stereotype threat may affect some women, the existing state of knowledge does not support the current level of enthusiasm for this as a mechanism underlying the gender gap in mathematics. We argue there are many reasons to close this gap, and that too much weight on the stereotype explanation may hamper research and implementation of effective interventions.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Baron-Cohen S., Knickmeyer R. C., & Belmonte M. K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Science, 310, 819–823.
Benbow C. P., & Stanley J. C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science, 210, 1262–1264.
Benbow C. P., & Stanley J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–1031.
Brown R. P., & Josephs R. A. (1999). A burden of proof: Stereotype relevance and gender differences in math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 246–257.
Brown University News Service. (2000). Women perform better in math when tested without men, study says [Press release]. Retrieved from http://brown.edu/Administration/News_Bureau/2000-01/00-023.html
Carey B. (2011, November). Fraud case seen as a red flag for psychology research. New York Times, A3.
Casey M. B., Nuttall R., & Benbow C. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in mathematics college entrance test-scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31, 697–705.
Ceci S. J., & Williams W. M. (2007). Why aren't more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. Washington, DC: APA.
Ceci S. J., & Williams W. M. (2010). The mathematics of sex: How biology and society conspire to limit talented women and girls. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ceci S. J., Williams W. M., & Barnett S. M. (2009). Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 218–261.
Chapman J. P., & Miller G. A. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 40–48.
Chrisler J. C., & McCreary D. R. (2010). Handbook of gender research in psychology. New York, NY: Springer.
Davies P. G., Spencer S. J., Quinn D. M., & Gerhardstein R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628.
Derks B., Inzlicht M., & Kang S. (2008). The neuroscience of stigma and stereotype threat. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 163–181.
Erbé B. (2008, July). To the contrary. Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVlyJi5hwhA
Eriksson K., & Lindholm T. (2007). Making gender matter: The role of gender-based expectancies and gender identification on women's and men's math performance in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 329–338.
Farrell W. (2005). Why men earn more: The startling truth behind the pay gap—And what women can do about it. New York, NY: AMACOM.
Ferriman K., Lubinski D., & Benbow C. P. (2009). Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and sex differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 517–532.
Fine C. (2010). Delusions of gender: The real science behind sex differences. London, England: Icon Books Ltd.
Forbes C. E., & Schmader T. (2010). Retraining attitudes and stereotypes to affect motivation and cognitive capacity under stereotype threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 740–754.
Fryer R. G., & Levitt S. D. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal-applied Economics, 2, 210–240.
Geary D. C. (1996). Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 229–247.
Geary D. C. (2010). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gonzales P. M., Blanton H., & Williams K. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 659–670.
Good C., Aronson J., & Harder J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women's achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 17–28.
Goodall A. (2010). Sister's winning formula. Times Higher Education, 1967, 34–39.
Grand J. A., Ryan A. M., Schmitt N., & Hmurovic J. (2011). How far does stereotype threat reach? The potential detriment of face validity in cognitive ability testing. Human Performance, 24, 1–28.
Grimm L. R., Markman A. B., Maddox W. T., & Baldwin G. C. (2009). Stereotype threat reinterpreted as a regulatory mismatch. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 288–304.
Halpern D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Halpern D. F., Benbow C. P., Geary D. C., Gur R. C., Hyde J. S., & Gernsbacher M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science, 8, 1–51.
Hedges L. V., & Nowell A. (1995). Sex differences in mental scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45.
Hines M. (2010). Sex-related variation in human behavior and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 448–456.
Hyde J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.
Hyde J. S., & Mertz J. E. (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 106, 8801–8807.
Hyde J. S., Fennema E., & Lamon S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139–155.
Inzlicht M., & Ben-Zeev T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365–371.
Johns M., Schmader T., & Martens A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle. Psychological Science, 16, 175–179.
Johnson E. S. (1984). Sex differences in problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1359–1371.
Josephs R. A., Newman M. L., Brown R. P., & Beer J. M. (2003). Status, testosterone, and human intellectual performance: Stereotype threat as status concern. Psychological Science, 14, 158–163.
Keller J. (2002). Blatant stereotype threat and women's math performance: Self-handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 193–198.
Keller J. (2007). Stereotype threat in classroom settings: The interactive effect of domain identification, task difficulty and stereotype threat on female students' maths performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 323–338.
Keller J., & Dauenheimer D. (2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women's math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 371–381.
Kit K. A., Tuokka H. A., & Mateer C. A. (2008). A review of the stereotype threat literature and its application in a neurological population. Neuropsychology Review, 18, 132–148.
Krendl A. C., Richeson J. A., Kelley W. M., & Heatherton T. F. (2008). The negative consequences of threat: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the neural mechanisms underlying women's underperformance in math. Psychological Science, 19, 168–175.
Lawrence J. S., & Charbonneau J. (2009). The link between basing self-worth on academics and student performance depends on domain identification and academic setting. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 615–620.
Lesko A. C., & Corpus J. H. (2006). Discounting the difficult: How high math-identified women respond to stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 54, 113–125.
Lindberg S. M., Hyde J. S., Petersen J. L., & Linn M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1123–1135.
Lubinski D., Benbow C. P., & Sanders C. E. (1993). Reconceptualizing gender differences in achievement among the gifted. In Heller K. A., Monks F. J., & Passow A. H., International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 693–707). London, England: Pergamon Press.
Martens A., Johns M., Greenberg J., & Schimel J. (2006). Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self-affirmation on women's intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 236–243.
Marx D. M., & Roman J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women's math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1183–1193.
McIntyre R. B., Paulson R. M., & Lord C. G. (2003). Alleviating women's mathematics stereotype threat through salience of group achievements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 83–90.
Muzzatti B., & Agnoli F. (2007). Gender and mathematics: Attitudes and stereotype threat susceptibility in Italian children. Developmental Psychology, 43, 747–759.
Myers D. G. (2008). Social psychology (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Nguyen H. H. D., & Ryan A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1314–1334.
O'Brien L. T., & Crandall C. S. (2003). Stereotype threat and arousal: Effects on women's math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 782–789.
Osborne J. W. (2007). Linking stereotype threat and anxiety. Educational Psychology, 27, 135–154.
Penner A. M. (2003). International gender-by-item difficulty interactions in mathematics and science achievement tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 650–655.
Sackett P. R., Hardison C. M., & Cullen M. J. (2004a). On interpreting stereotype threat as accounting for African American-White differences on cognitive tests. American Psychologist, 59, 7–13.
Sackett P. R., Hardison C. M., & Cullen M. J. (2004b). On the value of correcting mischaracterizations of stereotype threat. American Psychologist, 59, 48–49.
Schmader T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194–201.
Schmader T., & Johns M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.
Smith J. L. (2004). Understanding the process of stereotype threat: A review of mediational variables and new performance goal directions. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 177–206.
Smith L. G. E., & Postmes T. (2011). Shaping stereotypical behaviour through the discussion of social stereotypes. British Journal Of Social Psychology, 50, 74–98.
Spencer S. J., Steele C. M., & Quinn D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.
Steele C. M., & Aronson J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
Steele C. M., & Aronson J. A. (2004). Stereotype threat does not live by Steele and Aronson (1995) alone. American Psychologist, 59, 47–48.
Stewart T. L., Latu I. M., Kawakami K., & Myers A. C. (2010). Consider the situation: Reducing automatic stereotyping through situational attribution training. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 221–225.
Strand S., Deary I. J., & Smith P. (2006). Sex differences in cognitive abilities test scores: A UK national picture. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 463–480.
Viechtbauer W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48.
Wai J., Cacchio M., Putallaz M., & Makel M. C. (2010). Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 30 year examination. Intelligence, 38, 412–423.
Wheeler S. C., & Petty R. E. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797–826.
Wicherts J. M., Dolan C. V., & Hessen D. J. (2005). Stereotype threat and group differences in test performance: A question of measurement invariance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 696–716.
Wraga M., Helt M., Jacobs E., & Sullivan K. (2008). Neural basis of stereotype-induced shifts in women's mental rotation performance. Scan, 2, 12–19.
Yeager D. S., & Walton G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They're not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81, 267–301.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: March 1, 2012
Issue published: March 2012

Keywords

  1. stereotype threat
  2. gender gap
  3. mathematics performance

Rights and permissions

© 2012 American Psychological Association.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gijsbert Stoet
Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
David C. Geary
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia

Notes

We thank Jeff Rouder, Ben Winegard, Jon Oxford, and Drew Bailey for insightful comments and discussion. We thank Kimmo Eriksson, Chad Forbes, Jason Lawrence, Torun Lindholm, Lauri O'Brien, and Toni Schmader for providing data necessary for the meta-analysis, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.
Gijsbert Stoet, Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom[email protected]
David C. Geary, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO 65211-2500

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Review of General Psychology.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 2852

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 110

  1. A National Study Exploring Factors Promoting Adolescent College Readin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Adding Up Peer Beliefs: Experimental and Field Evidence on the Effect ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  3. A Systematic Review of the Consequences of Stigma and Stereotype Threa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  4. What does gender has to do with math? Complex questions require comple...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Mind the gender gap: The social neuroscience of belonging
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Does Stereotype Threat Contribute to the Political Knowledge Gender Ga...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Explaining the gender gap in negotiation performance: Social network t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Teaching Media Psychology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Expressing the self or achieving security through academic choices: Im...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Gender Similarities in the Mathematical Performance of Early School-Ag...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. The sexual brain, genes, and cognition: A machine‐predicted brain sex ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. The uniformity of stereotype threat: Analyzing the moderating effects ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Mathematics–gender stereotype endorsement influences mathematics anxie...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Stereotype Threat Theory in Organizational Research: Constructive Anal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Gender stereotypes: implicit threat to performance or boost for motiva...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Stereotype threat, gender and mathematics attainment: A conceptual rep...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. What race and gender stand for: using Markov blankets to identify cons...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Gender differences in mathematics achievement: A secondary analysis of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Investigating the importance of girls’ mathematical identity within Un...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Teaching Media Psychology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Interventionen gegen Stereotype Threat: Ein Überblick
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Ist Wissen wirklich die halbe Miete? Überprüfung der Effektivität eine...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Development of children’s math attitudes: Gender differences, key soci...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Does expressive writing or an instructional intervention reduce the im...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Genre et cursus scientifiques : un état des lieux
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. The effects of activating a “baby brain” stereotype on pregnant women’...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. The Impact of Naturalistic Age Stereotype Activation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Stereotype Threat in High School Classrooms: How It Links to Teacher M...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. References
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Mediational effect of prior preparation on performance differences of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Shifting Minds: A Quantitative Reappraisal of Cognitive-Intervention R...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  33. Teaching Media Psychology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Emotionsregulation im Kontext von Stereotype Threat: Die Reduzierung d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Women on the edge of a breakthrough? A stereotype threat theory of wom...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. A Cultural Psychological Model of Cross-National Variation in Gender G...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  37. Collaborative Learning in Sociology Research Methods Courses: Does Rac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. The applied implications of age-based stereotype threat for older adul...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Explaining the gender gaps in mathematics achievement and attitudes: T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Affirmation and Majority Students: Does Affirmation Impair Academic Pe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. The influence of gender on the choice of education: the mediating effe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Tribalism in War and Peace: The Nature and Evolution of Ideological Ep...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. The effect of first high school science teacher's gender and gender ma...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Ideological Blinders in the Study of Sex Differences in Participation ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Warum Mädchen schlechter rechnen und Jungen schlechter lesen – Wenn Ge...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Emotionsregulation im Kontext von Stereotype Threat: Die Reduzierung d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Sex Differences in Intelligence
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. The independent contributions of gender stereotypes and gender identif...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Exposure to half-dressed women and economic behavior
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. The distinct effect of multiple sources of stereotype threat
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Stereotype threat may not impact women's inhibitory control or mathema...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Heterosis in COMT Val158Met Polymorphism Contributes to Sex-Difference...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Cumulative Science via Bayesian Posterior Passing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Mathematics and Emotions: The Case of Math Anxiety
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Grit
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Gender Stereotypes in a Children's Television Program: Effects on Girl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Education or Indoctrination? The Accuracy of Introductory Psychology T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Pre-Service Teachers’ Views of the Child—Reproducing or Challenging Ge...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Does weight stigma reduce working memory? Evidence of stereotype threa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Comparisons of content and scientific quality indicators across peer-r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. The influence of gender stereotype threat on mathematics test scores o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Stereotype threat among students with disabilities: the importance of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Parental Occupation and the Gender Math Gap: Examining the Social Repr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Stereotype Threat and Educational Tracking: A Field Experiment in Chin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Undressed for Success? The Effects of Half-Naked Women on Economic Beh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Biology and the Gender Gap in Educational Performance: The Role of Pre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Embodied Harm: A Phenomenological Engagement with Stereotype Threat
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Political Correctness in Philoso...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. The effect of stereotype threat on older people’s clinical cognitive o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Gender Gap in Mathematics and Physics in Chinese Middle Schools: A Cas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Exploring the gender gap in the conceptual survey of electricity and m...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Do Gender Roles and Norms Affect Performance in Maths? The Impact of A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. An Examination of Age-Based Stereotype Threat About Cognitive Decline...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  75. An Open Letter to Our Students: Doing Interdisciplinary Moral Psycholo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Validating the proposed structure of the relationships among test anxi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Expert performance of men and women: A cross-cultural study in the che...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Stereotype Threat and Gender: Math Performance in Chinese College Stud...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Do performance avoidance goals moderate the effect of different types ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Rethinking Explicit Expectations: Connecting Placebos, Social Cognitio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Math Question Type and Stereotype Threat: Evidence from Educational Se...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Social Work Students and Faculty: Testing the Convergence of Perspecti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Stereotype manipulation effects on math and spatial test performance: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Twenty Years of Stereotype Threat Research: A Review of Psychological ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Stereotype Threat
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Can Incarceration Really Strip People of Racial Privilege?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. 'Membership Has Its Privileges': Status Incentives and Categorical Ine...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. The Influence of Chronic and Situational Social Status on Stereotype S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Gender differences in a technology-based numeracy intervention in a de...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. What a Loaded Generalization: Generics and Social Cognition
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. Gender and Social-Cognitive Development
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. The Impact of Symbolic and Non-Symbolic Quantity on Spatial Learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. Mathematics for All? The Case for and Against National Testing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. Myths about Learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  96. Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. Trends in GRE scores and graduate enrollments by gender and ethnicity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  98. Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: key principles a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. A Replication Attempt of Stereotype Susceptibility ()
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  100. The new science of cognitive sex differences
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  101. Gender-, race-, and income-based stereotype threat: the effects of mul...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  102. Is There Neurosexism in Functional Neuroimaging Investigations of Sex ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  103. Concepts and implications of altruism bias and pathological altruism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  104. Beyond Performance: A Motivational Experiences Model of Stereotype Thr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  105. A lesson not to be learned? Understanding stereotype threat does not p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  106. Exploring the Moderating Role of Context on the Mathematics Performanc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  107. Sex Differences in Mathematics and Reading Achievement Are Inversely R...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  108. Stereotyped: Investigating Gender in Introductory Science Courses
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  109. Test anxiety and performance-avoidance goals explain gender difference...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  110. Gender Differences in the Demand and Effects of Relative Performance F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text