Skip to main content

News for Sale: ‘Paid News’, Media Ethics, and India’s Democratic Public Sphere

  • Chapter

Abstract

It is difficult to theorize the practice of ‘paid news’ in routine democratic discourse. As such, sociologists have been skeptical of media’s objectivity or selective perceptions, but even by those standards putting a price tag on news coverage is the new low for India’s thriving quality press. Ample literature has been written on how media is linked to the exercise of power and hegemony, how it helps in manufacturing consent and steering of public opinions, or how concerns of the marginalized citizens seldom make news (Gramsci 1971, Adorno and Horkheimer 1979, Herman and Chomsky 1988, Entman 1989, Nimmo and Combs 1990, Entman and Bannett 2001). More specifically, some research is now available on the awesome spread of the Indian media, particularly in the language market, and also on its pro-urban and pro-market predispositions (Jeffrey 2000, Ninan 2007, Thakurta 2009, Mudgal 2011, Krishnan 2012). But the issue of selling editorial space by the ‘free press’ still baffles the believers and the skeptics alike. What is now (in)famous as ‘paid news’ in India is the practice of charging a fee, in cash or equity, from politicians, film stars, businessmen, or from private companies, for presenting biased and one-sided news items to be passed off as routine news coverage. Its occurrence goes up during elections, when individual candidates or their parties could do with orchestrated hype, or when a private company enters the equity market or even when a new movie is about to be released.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adorno, T. and Horkheimer, M. 1979. ‘The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception’, in T. Adorno and M. Horkheimer (eds.), Dialectic of Enlightenment, pp. 120–124. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagdikian, B. 1992. The Media Monopoly (fourth edition). Beacon Press: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, R. and Reifeld H. (eds.) 2005. Civil Society, Public Sphere and Citizenship: Dialogues and Perspectives. London: New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1989. Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, Clifford G., Fackler, Mark and Rotzoll, Kim B. 1995. Media Ethics: Cases and Moral Reasoning. USA: Longman Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Adoni A. and Bantz, Charles R. (eds.) 1990. Social Conflict and Television News. London, NY: Sage Library of Research 183, Sage, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, Lincoln 2011. Reconstructing Digital Democracy: An Outline of Four Positions. New Media and Society, 13(6). September 2011. LA, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington DC: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R. M. 1989. Democracy Without Citizens: Media and the Decay of American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R. M. and Bannett, W. L. 2001. Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. 1990. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy, Social Text No 25/26. Duke University Press. http://api.ning.com/files/hRwSaOzKhGD-wGyDZuJeNffJvQrETo9IizI7bNRisAQ/ RethinkingthePublicSphere.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, P. and Elliot, P. 1979. Making the News. London and New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrance and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. 1964. The Public Sphere, An Encyclopaedia Article (Originally Appeared in Fischer Lexicon, Staat und Politik). New Edition, Frankfurt Mam main 1964. pp. 220–226. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0094-033X%28197423% 290%3A3%3C49%3ATPSAEA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, S. Edward and Chomsky, N. 1988. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohendahl, Peter Uwe. 1979. Critical Theory, Public Sphere and Culture, Jargen Habermas and His Critics. New German Critique No 16 (Winter 1979). http://www.jstor.org/stable/487878 (last accessed on March 19, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, R. 2000. India’s Newspaper Revolution: Capitalism, Politics and the Language Press. New Delhi: Oxford University Press (Third Edition 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karan, K. 2009. ‘Political Communication in India’, in L. Willnat and A. Aw (eds.), Political Communication in Asia, pp. 191–215. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. 1991. The Media and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D. 2000. ‘Habermas, the Public Sphere, and Democracy: A Critical Intervention’ in Lewis Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas (eds), Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D. 2005. Media Spectacles and the Crises of Democracy: Terrorism, Wars, and Election Battles, Paradigm. Also see The Media and Social Problems at: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, S. 2012. Urban Press Glosses over Rural Protests (Coverage Given to Anti-Nuclear Protests in Kudankulam) The Hoot/Books and Research http://thehoot.org/web/Urbanpressglossesoverruralprotests/6064-1-1-9-true.html (last accessed on January 12, 2013).

  • Kuhn, T. S. 1980. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. 1966. The Second Treatise of Government. Oxford: Basil, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw, E. 2005. The Media and Political Process. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manoff, R. K. and Schudson, M. (eds.) 1986. Reading the News. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, Vinod. 2011. Lucknow Boy: A Memoir. New Delhi: Penguin Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudgal, V. 2011. Rural Coverage in the Hindi and English Dailies, Economic and Political Weekly, XLVI(35), July 27, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo, D. and Combs, J. E. 1990. Mediated Political Realities. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninan, S. 2007. Headlines from the Heartland: Reinventing the Hindi Public Sphere. New Delhi: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 2000. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scammell, M. 2007. ‘Political Brands and Consumer Citizens: The Rebranding of Tony Blair’, pp. 176–192, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611, The Consumption of Politics/The Politics of Consumption.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, D. 1981. Objectivity and the News: The Public and the Rise of Commercial Journalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid and de Graaf. 1982. Violence as Communication: Insurgent Terrorism and the Western News Media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson 2011. ‘Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press’, in Doris A. Graber (ed.), Media Power in Politics, pp. 33–44. Washington DC: C Q Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakurta, Guha Paranjoy 2009. Media Ethics Truth Fairness and Objectivity: Making and Breaking News. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, G. 1971. ‘Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen’s Notions of Objectivity’, American Journal of Sociology, 77 (4): 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, G. 1978. Making News. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Graeme. 2010. Ordinary People and the Media: The Demonic Turn. LA, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, DC: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Vipul Mudgal

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mudgal, V. (2015). News for Sale: ‘Paid News’, Media Ethics, and India’s Democratic Public Sphere. In: Rao, S., Wasserman, H. (eds) Media Ethics and Justice in the Age of Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137498267_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics