The Dynamics of Client-Consultant Relationships: Exploring the Interplay of Power and Knowledge
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the dynamics of client-consultant relationships and analyze how power and knowledge are shared and negotiated between consultants and clients during the implementation of configurable technologies. Empirical evidence is provided by three case studies representing three classic types of client-consultant relationships. We draw on two complementary perspectives: possession view (i.e., power and knowledge are based on resources that can be owned or controlled by individuals) and practice view (i.e., power and knowledge are relational in nature and exercised in action). The paper develops a framework that shows that power and knowledge are closely intertwined and that the possession and practice views are complementary in understanding configurable technology projects. The paper also demonstrates the importance of the initial set-up of the project and how knowing/powering mechanisms can reinforce or change implementation trajectories, which, in turn, can affect project results.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Asaro P.M. (2000). Transforming Society by Transforming Technology: The science and politics of participatory design, Accounting, Management and Information Technology 10(4): 257–290.
Astley W.G., and Sachdeva P.S. (1984). Structural Sources of Interorganizational Power: A theoretical synthesis, Academy of Management Review 9(1): 104–113.
Avgerou C., and McGrath K. (2007). Power, Rationality, and the Art of Living through Socio-technical Change, MIS Quarterly 31(2): 295–315.
Avgerou C., and Walsham G. (2000). Information Technology in Context: Studies from the perspective of developing countries, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Barrett M., and Oborn E. (2010). Boundary Object use in Cross-cultural Software Development Teams, Human Relations 63(8): 1199.
Bennett J.L. (2001). The Next Professional Wave: Consultant/coach, Consulting to Management 12(3): 6–8.
Bloomfield B.P., and Best A. (1992). Management Consultants: Systems development, power and the translation of problems, The Sociological Review 38: 533–559.
Bloomfield B.P., and Danieli A. (1995). The Role of Management Consultants in the Development of Information Technology: The indissoluble nature of socio-political and technical skills, Journal of Management Studies 32(1): 23–46.
Bloomfield B.P., and Vurdubakis T. (1994). Re-presenting Technology: IT consultancy reports as textual reality constructions, Sociology. 28(2): 455–477.
Boudreau M.C., and Robey D. (2005). Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A human agency perspective, Organization Science 16(1): 3–18.
Bradshaw-Camball P., and Murray V.V. (1991). Illusions and Other Games: A trifocal view of organizational politics, Organization Science. 2(4): 379–398.
Carlile P.R. (2002). A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development, Organization Science 13(4): 442–455.
Chan E., and Mills A. (2011). Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Software in a Major Construction Contracting Organization in Hong Kong, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 4(1): 168–178.
Clark T., and Salaman G. (1998). Telling Tales: Management gurus’ narratives and the construction of managerial utility, Journal of Management Studies 35(2): 137–161.
Contu A., and Willmott H. (2003). Re-embedding Situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory, Organization Science 14(3): 283–296.
Cook S.D.N., and Brown J.S. (1999). Bridging Epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing, Organization Science 10(4): 381–400.
Currie G., and Kerrin M. (2004). The Limits of a Technology Fix to Knowledge Management Epistemological, Political and Cultural Issues in the Case of Intranet Implementation, Management Learning 35(1): 9–29.
Czander W., and Eisold K. (2003). Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Organizational Consulting: Transference and counter-transference, Human Relations 56(4): 475–490.
Denis J.-L., Langley A., and Cazale L. (1996). Leadership and strategic change under ambiguity, Organization Studies 17(4): 673–689.
Fincham R. (1992). Perspectives on Power: Processual, institutional and ‘internal’ forms of organizational power, Journal of Management Studies 29(6): 741–759.
Fincham R. (1999). The Consultant-client Relationship: Critical perspectives on the management of organizational change, Journal of Management Studies 36(3): 335–351.
Fichman R.G., and Moses S.A. (1999). An incremental process for software implementation, Sloan Management Review 40(2): 39–52.
Fleck J. (1993). Configurations: Crystallizing contingency, The International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing 3(1): 15–36.
Fleck J. (1994). Learning by Trying: The implementation of configurational technology, Research Policy 23: 637–652.
Foucault M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, New York: Pantheon Books.
Françoise O., Bourgault M., and Pellerin R. (2009). ERP Implementation through Critical Success Factors’ Management, Business Process Management Journal 15(3): 371–394.
Gilbert K. (1998). Consultancy Fatigue: Epidemiology, symptoms and prevention, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 19(6): 340–346.
Glesne C. (1999). Becoming Qualitative Researchers, New York: Longman.
Glick W.H., Huber G.P., Miller C.C., Doty D.H., and Sutcliffe K.M. (1990). Studying Changes in Organizational Design and Effectiveness: Retrospective event histories and periodic assessments, Organization Science 1(3): 293–312.
Gray P.H. (2001). The impact of Knowledge Repositories on Power and Control in the Workplace, Information Technology & People 14(4): 368–384.
Handley K., Clark T., Fincham R., and Sturdy A. (2007). Researching Situated Learning: Participation, identity and practices in client-consultant relationships, Management Learning 38(2): 173–191.
Hardy C., and Leiba-O'Sullivan S. (1998). The Power behind Empowerment: Implications for research and practice, Human Relations 51(4): 451–483.
Hawari A., and Heeks R. (2010). Explaining ERP Failure in a Developing Country: A Jordanian case study, Journal of Enterprise Information Management 23(2): 135–160.
Hislop D., Newell S., Scarbrough H., and Swan J. (2000). Networks, Knowledge and Power: Decision making, politics and the process of innovation, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 12(3): 399–411.
Howcroft D., and Wilson M. (2003). Paradoxes of Participatory Practices: The Janus role of the systems developer, Information & Organization 13(1): 1–24.
Jasperson J., Carte T., and Saunders C. (2002). Review: Power and Information Technology Research: A metatriangulation review, MIS Quarterly 26(4): 397–459.
Johnson G., Langley A., Melin L., and Whittington R. (2007). The Practice of Strategy: Research directions and resources, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones M. (2003). The Expert System: Constructing expertise in an IT/ management consultancy, Information and Organization 13: 257–284.
Kaarst-Brown M.L. (1999). Five Symbolic Roles of the External Consultant - Integrating change, power and symbolism, Journal of Organizational Change Management 12(6): 540–561.
Kakabadse N., Louchart E., and Kakabadse A. (2006). Consultant's Role: A qualitative inquiry from the consultant's perspective, Journal of Management Development 25(5): 416–500.
Langley A. (1999). Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data, Academy of Management Review 24(4): 691–710.
Lave J., and Wenger E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee M. (2002). Management History as Told by Popular Culture: The screen image of the efficiency expert, Management Decision 40(9): 881–894.
Levina N. (2005). Collaborating on Multiparty Information Systems Development Projects: A collective reflection-in-action view, Information Systems Research 16(2): 109–130.
Light B. (2002). Going beyond ‘Misfit’ as a Reason for ERP Package Customization, Computers in Industry 56(6): 606–619.
Llewellyn R.N. (2002). When to Call the Organization Doctor, HR Magazine 47(3): 79–83.
Long C. (1999). To Create Value, First Understand Your Client, Journal of Management Consulting 10(4): 12–19.
Lundberg C.C. (1994). Transactions and Games in Consultant-Client Relations, Journal of Management Consulting 8(1): 3–9.
Markus M.L. (1983). Power, Politics and MIS Implementation, Communications of the ACM 26(6): 430–444.
Marshall N., and Brady T. (2001). Knowledge Management and the Politics of Knowledge: Illustrations from complex products and systems, European Journal of Information Systems 10: 99–112.
Marshall N., and Rollinson J. (2004). Maybe Bacon Had a Point: The politics of interpretation in collective sensemaking, British Journal of Management 15: S71–S86.
Nicolini D. (2011). Practice as Site of Knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine, Organization Science 22(3): 602–620.
Orlikowski W.J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing, Organization Science 13(3): 249–273.
Orlikowski W.J. (2007). Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring technology at work, Organization Studies 28(9): 1435–1448.
Oswick C., and Montgomery J. (1999). Images of an Organization: The use of metaphor in a multinational company, Journal of Organizational Change Management 12(6): 501–523.
Pan S.L., and Scarbrough H. (1999). Knowledge Management in Practice: An exploratory case study, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 11: 359–374.
Pozzebon M., and Pinsonneault A. (2005). Global-Local Negotiations for Implementing Configurable Packages: The power of initial organization decisions, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Special Issue Understanding the Contextual Influences on Enterprise System Implementation (Part II) 14(2): 121–145.
Pozzebon M., and Van Heck E. (2006). Local Adaptations of Generic Application Systems: The case of veiling Holambra in Brazil, Journal of Information Technology 21: 73–85.
Ranson S., Hinings B., and Greenwood R. (1980). The Structuring of Organizational Structures, Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 1–17.
Rolland K.H., and Monteiro E. (2002). Balancing the Local and the Global in Infrastructural Information Systems, The Information Society Journal 18(2): 87–100.
Sambamurthy V., and Subramani M. (2005). Special Issue on Information Technologies and Knowledge Management, MIS Quarterly 29(2): 193–196.
Schein E.H. (1988). Process Consultation: Its Role in Organization Development, Vol. I., 2nd edn, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Schein E.H. (1999). Empowerment, Coercive Persuasion and Organizational Learning, The Learning Organization 6(4): 163–172.
Sillince J.A.A., and Mouakket S. (1997). Varieties of Political Process during Systems Development, Information Systems Research 8(4): 368–397.
Simpson B. (2009). Pragmatism, Mead and the Practice Turn, Organization Studies 30(12): 1329–1347.
Stake R.E. (1998). Case Studies, in Denzin N.K., and Lincoln Y.S. (eds.) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, California: Sage Publications.
Sturdy A. (1997). The Consultancy Process - An insecure business? Journal of Management Studies 34(3): 389–413.
Sturdy A., Schwarz M., and Spicer A. (2006). Guess Who's Coming to Dinner? Structures and Uses of Liminality in Strategic Management Consultancy, Human Relations 59(7): 929–960.
Sutton R.I., and Hargadon A. (1996). Brainstorming Groups in Context: Effectiveness in a product design firm, Administrative Science Quarterly 41(4): 685–718.
Swan J., Newell S., and Robertson M. (2000). The Diffusion, Design and Social Shaping of Production Management Information Systems in Europe, Information Technology and People 13(1): 27–45.
Taminiau Y., Smit W., and Lange A. (2009). Innovation in Management Consulting Firms through Informal Knowledge Sharing, Journal of Knowledge Management 13(1): 42–55.
Wagner E., Scott S., and Galliers R.D. (2006). The Creation of ‘Best Practice’ Software: Myth, reality and ethics, Information and Organization 16(3): 251–275.
Weick K. (2001). Making Sense of the Organization, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Wenger E. (2000). Communities of Practices and Social Learning Systems, Organization. 7(2): 225–246.
Williams R. (1997). Universal Solutions or Local Contingencies? Tensions and Contradictions in the Mutual Shaping of Technology and Work Organization, in McLoughlin I., and Harris M. (eds.) Innovation, Organization Change and Technology, London, UK: International Thomson Business Press, pp. 170–185.
Williams R. (2001). The Client's Role in the Consulting Relationship: Is there ‘con’ in consulting? Managerial Auditing Journal 16(9): 519–522.
Wilson F.A. (1997). The Truth is Out there: The search for emancipatory principles in information systems design, Information Technology & People 10(3): 187–199.
Yanow D. (2004). Translating Local Knowledge at Organizational Peripheries, British Journal of Management 15: S9–S25.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: March 1, 2012
Issue published: March 2012
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Journal of Information Technology.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 711
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 29
-
On the emotional dynamics of guided strategizing: An affective view on...
-
Does Mobile Instant Messaging (MIM) affect power redistribution? Evide...
-
Knowledge Commoning: Scaffolding and Technoficing to Overcome Challeng...
-
Power relations inscribed in the enactment of systems development meth...
-
Mechanisms of power inscription into IT go...
-
Power dynamics in software platform ecosystems
-
Citizens influencing public policy‐making: Resourcing as source of rel...
-
Power dynamics in organisations and the role of information systems
-
Knowledge creation and external consultants during ERP implementation:...
-
Towards a sociomaterial approach to inter-organizational boundaries: H...
-
Adversarial factors in multi-stakeholders’ engagement of global-IT pro...
-
Agility and system documentation in large-scale enterprise system proj...
-
From The Hague to Paris to Montréal: Knowledge transfer and cultural s...
-
Heterogeneity in client motives for utilizing management consulting
-
The Influence of Themes of Interplay on Multistakeholders Engagement A...
-
Show Me the Money
-
A reflection on information systems strategizing: the role of power an...
-
The Adoption and Impact of ICT in South African SMEs
-
The client-consultant relationship in ERP implementation in government...
-
The Introduction and a Framework for TQM
-
A Framework of Mechanisms for Integrating Emerging Technology Innovati...
-
The client-consultant relationship in the implementation of ERP in gov...
-
The communication consultant: an important translator for communicatio...
-
Managing Knowledge and Managing Knowledge Work: What we know and what ...
-
The effect of social network structures at the business/IT interface o...
-
Knowing, Power and Materiality: A Critical Review and Reconceptualizat...
-
The Effect of Social Network Structures at the Business/IT Interface o...
-
Knowledge Boundaries and Spanning Practices in Configuring Packaged Sy...
-
Client and consultant engagement in public sector IS projects
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
