Skip to main content
No Access

Defining Marriage and Legitimacy

DURAN BELL is Professor in two departments, Economics and Anthropology, at the University of California, Irvine (Irvine, Calif. 92717, U.S.A.). Born in 1936, he received his B.A. in economics in 1960 and his Ph.D. in agricultural economics in 1965, both from the University of California, Berkeley. After joining the Irvine faculty in 1965, he was a research associate with the Brookings Institution 1971‐73 and a senior economist with the RAND Corporation 1973‐76. His work during this period led to an involvement in studies of nonmarket exchange processes, and eventually he found ethnography the most effective grounding for his theoretical work. He joined the Department of Anthropology in 1985. His most recent publications include “Modes of Exchange: Gift and Commodity” (Journal of Socio‐Economics 20[2]) and (with S. Song) “Growth and Process in a Lineage‐Based Social Technology” {Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 2[1]) and “Explaining the Level of Bridewealth” (CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY 35:311‐16). The present paper was submitted 12 II 96 and accepted 4 III 96; the final version reached the Editor's office 18 III 96.

A cross‐culturally valid conception of marriage must begin with a definition of husband‐wife and with a distinction between spouses and lovers. From this perspective we find that marriage is an institution by which men are provided (socially supported) rights to women. Typically, this institution is embedded within a domestic group wherein a multiplicity of other rights and responsibilities are assigned. Hence, the definition of marriage attributable to E. R. Leach confounds domestic rights (which may exist in the absence of marriage) with marital rights.

Notes and Queries and Kathleen Gough define marriage by reference to the legitimacy of children. However, legitimacy is a construct oriented toward restricting access to resources on the basis of parentage. In particular, characteristics of parentage are used strategically as a basis for delimiting the set of offspring admissible into the corporate groups to which their fathers or in matrilineal systems their mothers belong. The extent to which legitimacy is tied to marriage is a strategic variable in the control of dominants within a social system. It is often associated with marriage but sometimes not.