Post-traumatic stress disorder: facts and fiction : Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Personality disorders and neuroses: Edited by Charles B. Pull and Aleksandar Janca

Post-traumatic stress disorder: facts and fiction

Zohar, Joseph; Juven-Wetzler, Alzbeta; Myers, Vicki; Fostick, Leah

Author Information
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 21(1):p 74-77, January 2008. | DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3282f269ee

Abstract

Purpose of review 

This review provides an update on contemporary perspectives on post-traumatic stress disorder and challenges myths about the disorder and its treatment. Post-traumatic stress disorder has recently attracted public attention because of the impact of international terrorism, although the vast majority of post-traumatic stress disorder cases actually relate to civilian events such as car accidents, rape and violent robbery. This disorder requires deeper understanding and consensus among professionals.

Recent findings 

Advances have been made in elucidating the neurobiology of this disorder, partly by using an animal model of post-traumatic stress disorder. Recent studies have focused on memory processes and the therapeutic role played by plasticity of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, and how this fits (or does not fit) in with the current therapeutic interventions. Guidelines have been established by various bodies in an attempt to streamline treatment options.

Summary 

Understanding of post-traumatic stress disorder is incomplete. Future research should attempt to determine what treatments given during the ‘window of opportunity’ – the time from exposure until post-traumatic stress disorder develops – are effective. Care should be taken not to interfere with spontaneous recovery.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid