Volume 35, Issue 2 p. 244-260

THE DEVELOPMENT AND DECLINE OF MEDIEVAL VOTING INSTITUTIONS: A COMPARISON OF ENGLAND AND FRANCE

YORAM BARZEL

YORAM BARZEL

Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle, Phone 1–206-543-2510 Fax 1–206-685-7477 E-mail [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
EDGAR KISER

EDGAR KISER

Department of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, Phone 1–206-543-7290 Fax 1–206-543-2516, E-mail [email protected]

*An earlier version of this paper was presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, Miami, August 1993. We got useful comments in seminars at the University of Washington, the University of Chicago, the UW-NSF Conference on Democracy and Markets, and from Kathryn Baker, Gary Becker, Terry Boswell, James Coleman, Andrew Creighton, John Freeman, Michael Hechter, Rosemary Hopcroft, Ron Jepperson, Margaret Levi, Kevin Neuhouser, Jonathan Pool, Sharon Reitman, and Joe Whitmeyer. We also wish to acknowledge the many useful comments from anonymous referees.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 September 2007
Citations: 25

Abstract

This paper argues that in the middle ages voting institutions emerged as mechanisms that allowed rulers to cooperate with subjects on mutually profitable projects. In spite of their utility, many of these voting institutions eventually declined. We test the model on the English parliament and the French estates general. The historical evidence strongly supports our view that these institutions declined in France, but not in England, due to increases in the heterogeneity of voters' interests and the insecurity of French rulers, since these factors made cooperation between French rulers and their subjects more difficult.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.