Volume 20, Issue 3 p. 526-536
RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

Environmental Impact Assessment of Household Consumption

Diana Ivanova

Corresponding Author

Diana Ivanova

Address correspondenceto: Diana Ivanova, Industrial Ecology Programme and Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Sem Sælands vei 7, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Konstantin Stadler Kjartan Steen-Olsen Richard Wood Gibran Vita Arnold Tukker Edgar G. Hertwich
First published: 18 December 2015
Citations: 467

Summary

We analyze the environmental impact of household consumption in terms of the material, water, and land-use requirements, as well as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, associated with the production and use of products and services consumed by these households. Using the new EXIOBASE 2.2 multiregional input-output database, which describes the world economy at the detail of 43 countries, five rest-of-the-world regions, and 200 product sectors, we are able to trace the origin of the products consumed by households and represent global supply chains for 2007. We highlight the importance of environmental pressure arising from households with their consumption contributing to more than 60% of global GHG emissions and between 50% and 80% of total land, material, and water use. The footprints are unevenly distributed across regions, with wealthier countries generating the most significant impacts per capita. Elasticities suggest a robust and significant relationship between households’ expenditure and their environmental impacts, driven by a rising demand of nonprimary consumption items. Mobility, shelter, and food are the most important consumption categories across the environmental footprints. Globally, food accounts for 48% and 70% of household impacts on land and water resources, respectively, with consumption of meat, dairy, and processed food rising fast with income. Shelter and mobility stand out with high carbon and material intensity, whereas the significance of services for footprints relates to the large amount of household expenditure associated with them.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.