Advertisement

Abstract

There are 481 segments longer than 200 base pairs (bp) that are absolutely conserved (100% identity with no insertions or deletions) between orthologous regions of the human, rat, and mouse genomes. Nearly all of these segments are also conserved in the chicken and dog genomes, with an average of 95 and 99% identity, respectively. Many are also significantly conserved in fish. These ultraconserved elements of the human genome are most often located either overlapping exons in genes involved in RNA processing or in introns or nearby genes involved in the regulation of transcription and development. Along with more than 5000 sequences of over 100 bp that are absolutely conserved among the three sequenced mammals, these represent a class of genetic elements whose functions and evolutionary origins are yet to be determined, but which are more highly conserved between these species than are proteins and appear to be essential for the ontogeny of mammals and other vertebrates.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (bejerano.som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
E. S. Landeret al., Nature409, 860 (2001).
2
J. C. Venteret al., Science291, 1304 (2001).
3
Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, in preparation.
4
R. H. Waterstonet al., Nature420, 520 (2002).
5
K. M. Roskin, M. Diekhans, D. Haussler, in Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology (ACM, New York, NY, 2003), pp. 257–266.
6
F. Chiaromonteet al., Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.68, 245 (2003).
7
R. C. Hardison, Trends Genet.16, 369 (2000).
8
G. G. Lootset al., Science288, 136 (2000).
9
L. A. Pennacchio, E. M. Rubin, Nature Rev. Genet.2, 100 (2001).
10
K. A. Frazeret al., Genome Res.11, 1651 (2001).
11
U. DeSilvaet al., Genome Res.12, 3 (2002).
12
E. T. Dermitzakiset al., Nature420, 578 (2002).
13
E. T. Dermitzakiset al., Science302, 1033 (2003).
14
Rat Genome Sequencing Consortium, Nature 428, 493 (2004).
15
G. M. Cooperet al., Genome Res.14, 539 (2004).
16
J. W. Thomaset al., Nature424, 788 (2003).
17
E. H. Margulies, M. Blanchette, D. Haussler, E. D. Green, Genome Res.13, 2507 (2003).
18
K. A. Frazeret al., Genome Res.14, 367 (2004).
19
M. Ashburneret al., Nature Genet.25, 25 (2000).
20
N. J. Mulderet al., Nucleic Acids Res.31, 315 (2003).
21
M. A. Nobrega, I. Ovcharenko, V. Afzal, E. M. Rubin, Science302, 413 (2003).
22
S. Plaza, C. Dozier, M. C. Langlois, S. Saule, Mol. Cell. Biol.15, 892 (1995).
23
L. Rahman, V. Bliskovski, F. J. Kaye, M. Zajac-Kaye, Genomics83, 76 (2004).
24
I. L. Hofacker, Nucleic Acids Res.31, 3429 (2003).
25
H. Jumaa, P. J. Nielsen, EMBO J.16, 5077 (1997).
26
B. Sommeret al., Science249, 1580 (1990).
27
P. J. Aruscavage, B. L. Bass, RNA6, 257 (2000).
28
E. H. Sherr, Curr. Opin. Pediatr.15, 567 (2003).
29
C. Sabarinadh, S. Subramanian, R. Mishra, Genome Biol.4 (2003).
30
M. Kellis, N. Patterson, M. Endrizzi, B. Birren, E. S. Lander, Nature423, 241 (2003).
31
G. Bejerano, D. Haussler, M. Blanchette, Bioinformatics (Suppl.), in press.
32
J. S. Mattick, M. J. Gagen, Mol. Biol. Evol.18, 1611 (2001).
33
E. T. Dermitzakiset al., Genome Res.14, 852 (2004).
34
K. H. Wolfe, P. M. Sharp, W. H. Li, Nature337, 283 (1989).
35
R. C. Hardisonet al., Genome Res.13, 13 (2003).
36
J. H. Chuang, H. Li, PLoS Biol.2, E29 (2004).
37
D. Boffelli, M. Nobrega, E. M. Rubin, Nature Rev. Genet., in press.
38
F. Spitz, F. Gonzalez, D. Duboule, Cell113, 405 (2003).
39
We thank the Genome Sequencing Consortia for the human, mouse, rat, dog, chicken, and other genome sequences we used in this analysis; W. Miller, M. Diekhans, A. Hinrichs, K. Rosenbloom, D. Thomas, and the members of the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) browser team for providing the genome alignments and other tracks of genome annotation available on the UCSC genome browser; M. Blanchette, S. Salama, T. Lowe, M. Ares, K. Pollard, and B. Cohen for helpful discussions; A. Siepel for the neutral substitution rate analysis involving chicken and chimp; K. Roskin for the calculation of the percent identity in ancestral repeat sites for 1-Mb windows; and S. Walton for help in preparing the manuscript. G.B., W.J.K., and D.H. were supported by National Human Genome Research Institute grant 1P41HG02371 and National Cancer Institute contract 22XS013A, and D.H. was additionally supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. S.S., M.P., I.M., and J.S.M. were supported by the Australian Research Council and the Queensland State Government.

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 304 | Issue 5675
28 May 2004

Article versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

Submission history

Received: 19 March 2004
Accepted: 27 April 2004
Published in print: 28 May 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Notes

Supporting Online Material
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/1098119/DC1
SOM Text
Figs. S1 to S3
Tables S1 to S7
References and Notes

Authors

Affiliations

Gill Bejerano* [email protected]
Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Michael Pheasant
ARC Special Research Centre for Functional and Applied Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Igor Makunin
ARC Special Research Centre for Functional and Applied Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Stuart Stephen
ARC Special Research Centre for Functional and Applied Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
W. James Kent
Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
John S. Mattick
ARC Special Research Centre for Functional and Applied Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
David Haussler* [email protected]
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] (G.B.); [email protected] (D.H.).

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Characterization of Two Transposable Elements and an Ultra-Conserved Element Isolated in the Genome of Zootoca vivipara (Squamata, Lacertidae), Life, 13, 3, (637), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030637
    Crossref
  2. Lnc-uc.147 Is Associated with Disease Stage of Liver, Gastric, and Renal Cancer, Biomolecules, 13, 2, (265), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020265
    Crossref
  3. Genome Evolution and the Future of Phylogenomics of Non-Avian Reptiles, Animals, 13, 3, (471), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030471
    Crossref
  4. MS0621, a novel small-molecule modulator of Ewing sarcoma chromatin accessibility, interacts with an RNA-associated macromolecular complex and influences RNA splicing, Frontiers in Oncology, 13, (2023).https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1099550
    Crossref
  5. An In Silico Approach to Define Potential Biomarkers of miRNA-Associated ceRNAs for Breast Cancer, Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 44, 1, (53-61), (2023).https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.1230387
    Crossref
  6. Transcribed Ultraconserved Regions: New regulators in cancer signaling and potential biomarkers, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 46, 1 suppl 2, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2022-0125
    Crossref
  7. A new biomarker panel of ultraconserved long non-coding RNAs for bladder cancer prognosis by a machine learning based methodology, BMC Bioinformatics, 23, S6, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-023-05167-6
    Crossref
  8. Upf1/Upf2 Regulation of 3′ Untranslated Region Splice Variants of AUF1 Links Nonsense-Mediated and A+U-Rich Element-Mediated mRNA Decay, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 26, 23, (8743-8754), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.02251-05
    Crossref
  9. cis -Regulatory Remodeling of the SCL Locus during Vertebrate Evolution , Molecular and Cellular Biology, 30, 24, (5741-5751), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00870-10
    Crossref
  10. Regulation of Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Function by Long Noncoding RNA uc.173 through Interaction with MicroRNA 29b , Molecular and Cellular Biology, 38, 13, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00010-18
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media