Advertisement

Abstract

Modern felid species descend from relatively recent (<11 million years ago) divergence and speciation events that produced successful predatory carnivores worldwide but that have confounded taxonomic classifications. A highly resolved molecular phylogeny with divergence dates for all living cat species, derived from autosomal, X-linked, Y-linked, and mitochondrial gene segments (22,789 base pairs) and 16 fossil calibrations define eight principal lineages produced through at least 10 intercontinental migrations facilitated by sea-level fluctuations. A ghost lineage analysis indicates that available felid fossils underestimate (i.e., unrepresented basal branch length) first occurrence by an average of 76%, revealing a low representation of felid lineages in paleontological remains. The phylogenetic performance of distinct gene classes showed that Y-chromosome segments are appreciably more informative than mitochondrial DNA, X-linked, or autosomal genes in resolving the rapid Felidae species radiation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (johnson_som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
K. Nowell, P. Jackson, Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, Wild Cats (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland, 1996).
2
R. M. Nowak, Walker's Mammals of the World (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD, 1999).
3
M. C. McKenna, S. K. Bell, Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level (Columbia Univ. Press, NY, 1997).
4
L. O. Salles, Am. Mus. Novit.3047, 1 (1992).
5
M. C. Mattern, D. A. McLennan, Cladistics16, 232 (2000).
6
W. E. Johnson, S. J. O'Brien, J. Mol. Evol.44, S98 (1997).
7
J. Pecon-Slattery, S. J. O'Brien, Genetics148, 1245 (1998).
8
J. Pecon-Slattery, A. J. Pearks Wilkerson, W. J. Murphy, S. J. O'Brien, Mol. Biol. Evol.21, 2299 (2004).
9
Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online and the Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, NCI, Web site, http://home.ncifcrf.gov/ccr/lgd.
10
R. E. Benveniste, in Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Monographs in Evolutionary Biology Series, R. J. MacIntyre, Ed. (Plenum Press, New York, 1985), pp. 359–417.
11
J. V. Lopez, N. Yuhki, R. Masuda, W. Modi, S. J. O'Brien, J. Mol. Evol.39, 174 (1994).
12
J. Kimet al., Gene, in press.
13
A. D. Yoderet al., Nature421, 734 (2003).
14
P. Gaubert, G. Veron, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. Biol. Sci.270, 2523 (2003).
15
G. de Beaumont, Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae57, 837 (1964).
16
B. U. Haq, J. Hardenbol, P. R. Vail, Science235, 1156 (1987).
17
R. M. Hunt, in Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution, Vol. 2, J. L. Gittleman, Ed. (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY, 1996), pp. 485–541.
18
D. S. Woodruff, J. Biogeogr.30, 551 (2003).
19
Q. Zhanxiang, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.279, 163 (2003).
20
L. G. Marshall, Am. Sci.76, 380 (1988).
21
C. A. Repenning, Quat. Sci. Rev20, 25 (2001).
22
L.Werdelin, M.E.Lewis, Zool. J. Linn. Soc.144, 121 (2005).
23
P. Forster, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser.B 359, 255 (2004).
24
S. J. O'Brien, W. E. Johnson, Annu. Rev. Genet. Hum. Genet.6, 407 (2005).
25
E. C. Teelinget al., Science307, 580 (2005).
26
A. Rokas, B. L. Williams, N. King, S. B. Carroll, Nature425, 798 (2003).
27
Z. Yang, Genetics162, 1811 (2002).
28
G. V. Glazko, M. Nei, Mol. Biol. Evol.20, 424 (2003).
29
C. O'hUigin, Y. Satta, N. Takahata, J. Klein, Mol. Biol. Evol.19, 1501 (2002).
30
Content of this publication does not necessarily reflect views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services. A.A. received a Fundacção para a Ciência e Tecnologia grant (SFRH/BPD/5700/2001). This research was supported by federal funds from the NIH/NCI (N01-CO-12400) and the NIH/NCI/CCR Intramural Research Program.

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 311 | Issue 5757
6 January 2006

Submission history

Received: 4 November 2005
Accepted: 30 November 2005
Published in print: 6 January 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Notes

Supporting Online Material
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/311/5757/73/DC1
Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S12
Tables S1 to S10
References

Authors

Affiliations

Warren E. Johnson* [email protected]
Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702–1201, USA.
Eduardo Eizirik
Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702–1201, USA.
Centro de Biologia Genômica e Molecular, Faculdade de Biociências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, RS 90619-900, Brazil.
Jill Pecon-Slattery
Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702–1201, USA.
William J. Murphy
Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702–1201, USA.
Agostinho Antunes
Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702–1201, USA.
REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal.
Emma Teeling
Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702–1201, USA.
Stephen J. O'Brien* [email protected]
Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702–1201, USA.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] (W.E.J.); [email protected] (S.J.O.)

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. How genomic insights into the evolutionary history of clouded leopards inform their conservation, Science Advances, 9, 40, (2023)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.adh9143
    Abstract
  2. The Near Eastern Origin of Cat Domestication, Science, 317, 5837, (519-523), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1139518
    Abstract
  3. Genomic evidence for the Chinese mountain cat as a wildcat conspecific (Felis silvestris bieti) and its introgression to domestic cats, Science Advances, 7, 26, (2021)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.abg0221
    Abstract
  4. Genome-wide signatures of complex introgression and adaptive evolution in the big cats, Science Advances, 3, 7, (2017)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.1700299
    Abstract
  5. Why do animal eyes have pupils of different shapes?, Science Advances, 1, 7, (2015)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.1500391
    Abstract
  6. Planning tiger recovery: Understanding intraspecific variation for effective conservation, Science Advances, 1, 5, (2015)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.1400175
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media