Advertisement

Dating Cave Paintings

A number of caves in Europe contain exquisite ancient art. Most of the art has been thought to be produced during the time of last glaciation by recently arrived modern humans, but dating of the art has been problematic because the art contains only minimal amounts of carbon for radiocarbon dating. Pike et al. (p. 1409; see the cover; see the Perspective by Hellstrom) have now obtained U-series dates on the calcite crusts that formed over the art from 11 caves in northwestern Spain. The ages from three caves are older than 35,000 years ago, and one dates to nearly 41,000 years ago. The earliest art used primarily red and was relatively formless; animal depictions appeared later. This dating is near the time of the arrival of modern humans and, because Neandertals were also present, complicates identifying the artists.

Abstract

Paleolithic cave art is an exceptional archive of early human symbolic behavior, but because obtaining reliable dates has been difficult, its chronology is still poorly understood after more than a century of study. We present uranium-series disequilibrium dates of calcite deposits overlying or underlying art found in 11 caves, including the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage sites of Altamira, El Castillo, and Tito Bustillo, Spain. The results demonstrate that the tradition of decorating caves extends back at least to the Early Aurignacian period, with minimum ages of 40.8 thousand years for a red disk, 37.3 thousand years for a hand stencil, and 35.6 thousand years for a claviform-like symbol. These minimum ages reveal either that cave art was a part of the cultural repertoire of the first anatomically modern humans in Europe or that perhaps Neandertals also engaged in painting caves.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S12
Table S1
References (3539)

Resources

File (1409.mp3)
File (pike.sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Sinclair A., Archaeology: Art of the ancients. Nature 426, 774 (2003).
2
Zilhão J., The emergence of ornaments and art: An archaeological perspective on the origins of behavioural “modernity. J. Archaeol. Res. 15, 1 (2007).
3
Conard N. J., Cultural modernity: Consensus or conundrum? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 7621 (2010).
4
J. Fortea, La plus ancienne production artistique du Paléolithique ibérique. in Pitture Paleolitiche nelle Prealpi venete. Grotta di Fumane e Riparo Dalmeri, A. Broglio, G. Dalmeri, Eds. (Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, Verona, 2005), pp. 89–99.
5
A. Leroi-Gourhan, B. Delluc, G. Delluc, Préhistoire de l’art occidental (Mazenod, Paris, 1995).
6
Pettitt P. B., Pike A. W. G., Dating European cave art: Progress, prospects, problems. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 14, 27 (2007).
7
Fortea Pérez F. J., Trente-neuf dates C14-SMA pour l’art pariétal paléolithique des Asturias. Bull. Soc. Préhistorique Ariège Pyrénées LVII, 7 (2002).
8
Pike A. W. G., et al., Verification of the age of the Palaeolithic rock art at Creswell Crags, UK. J. Archaeol. Sci. 32, 1649 (2005).
9
Hoffmann D. L., 230Th isotope measurements of femtogram quantities for U-series dating using multi ion counting (MIC) MC-ICPMS. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 275, 75 (2008).
10
Hoffmann D. L., et al., Procedures for accurate U and Th isotope measurements by high precision MC-ICPMS. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 264, 97 (2007).
11
Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials on Science Online.
12
Reimer P. J., et al., IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51, 1111 (2009).
13
Zilhão J., Chronostratigraphy of the Middle-to-Upper Palaeolithic transition in the Iberian peninsula. Pyrenae 37, 7 (2006).
14
Zilhão J., et al., Pego do Diabo (Loures, Portugal): dating the emergence of anatomical modernity in westernmost Eurasia. PLoS ONE 5, e8880 (2010).
15
Maroto J., et al., Current issues in late Middle Palaeolithic chronology: New assessments from northern Iberia. Quat. Int. 247, 15 (2012).
16
Straus L. G., The Upper Palaeolithic of Cantabrian Spain. Evol. Anthropol. 14, 145 (2005).
17
J. Zilhão, T. Aubry, F. Almeida, Un modèle technologique pour le passage du Gravettien au Solutréen dans le Sud-Ouest de l'Europe. in Les faciès leptolithiques du nord-ouest méditerranéen: milieux naturels et culturels. XXIVe Congrès Préhistorique de France. Carcassonne, 26-30 Septembre 1994, D. Sacchi, Ed. (Société Préhistorique Française, Paris, 1999), pp. 165–183.
18
Renard C., Continuity or discontinuity in the Late Glacial Maximum of south-western Europe: the formation of the Solutrean in France. World Archaeol. 43, 726 (2011).
19
I. J. Fairchild, S. Frisia, A. Borsato, A. F. Tooth, Speleothems. in Geochemical Sediments and Landscapes, D. J. Nash, S. J. McLaren, Eds. (Blackwell, Oxford, 2007), pp. 200–245.
20
A. Beltran, The Cave of Altamita (Harry Abrams, New York, 1999)
21
C. González-Sainz, R. Cacho Toca, R. Fukazawa, Arte Paleolítico en la Región Cantábrica (Universidad de Cantabria, Cantabria, Spain, 2003).
22
Bernaldo de Quirós F., Reflections on the art of the cave of Altamira. Proc. Prehistoric Soc. 57, 81 (1991).
23
Heras Martín C., Montes Barquín R., Lasheras J. A., Rasines P., Fatás Monforte P., Nuevas dataciones de la cueva de Altamira y su implicación en la cronología de su arte rupestre paleolítico. Cuadernos de Arte Rupestre de Moratalla 4, 117 (2008).
24
H. Breuil, E. Cartailhac, H. Obermaier, M. E. Boyle, The Cave of Altamira at Santillana del Mar, Spain (Tip. de Archivos, Madrid, 1935).
25
H. Breuil, Quatre cents siècles d’art pariétal. Les cavernes ornées de l’age du renne (Centre d’Etudes de Documentation Préhistoriques, Montignac, Paris, 1952).
26
M. Lorblanchet, Les Grottes Ornées de la Préhistoire. Nouveaux Regards (Editions Errance, Paris, 1995).
27
F. Djindjian, L’art Paléolithique dans son système culturel: essais de corrélations. 1. Chronologie, ‘styles’ et ‘cultures’. in Art Mobilier Paléolithique Supérieur en Europe Occidental, A-C. Welté, E. Ladier, Eds. [Actes du Colloque 8.3, Congrès de l’UISPP (Union Internationale des Sciences Préhistoriques et Protohistoriques), Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium, 2004], pp. 249–256.
28
J. Clottes, J. Courtin, The Cave Beneath the Sea: Palaeolithic Images at Cosquer (H. N. Adams, New York, 2006).
29
R. de Balbín, J. J. Alcolea, M. A. González, El macizo de Ardines, un lugar mayor del arte paleolítico europeo. in El Arte Prehistórico Desde Los Inicios del s. XXI. Primer Symposium Internacional de Arte Prehistórico de Ribadesella, R. de Balbín, P. Bueno, Eds. (Asociación Cultural de Amigos de Ribadesella, Ribadesella, Spain, 2003).
30
J. Clottes, Return to Chauvet Cave: Excavating the Birthplace of Art (Thames & Hudson, London, 2003).
31
P. B. Pettitt, P. Bahn, C. Züchner, The Chauvet conundrum: Are claims for the ‘birthplace of art’ premature? in An Enquiring Mind: Studies in Honor of Alexander Marshack, P. Bahn, Ed. (American School of Prehistoric Research Monograph Series, Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK, 2009), pp. 239–262.
32
Broglio A., de Stefani M., Gurioli F., Peresani M., The Aurignacian paintings of the Fumane Cave (Lessini mountains, Venetian prealps). Int. Newsl. Rock Art 44, 1 (2006).
33
B. Delluc, G. Delluc, L’Art Pariétal Archaïque en Aquitaine (Gallia Préhistoire XXVIII supplément, CNRS, Paris, 1991).
34
García-Diez M., Mujika Alustiza J. A., Sasieta M., Arruabarrena J., Alberdi J., Astigarraga Cave (Deba, Guipúzcoa, Spain) Archaeological work and human occupation. Int. Newsl. Rock Art 60, 13 (2011).
35
H. Alcalde del Río, H. Breuil, L. Sierra, Les cavernes de la Région Cantabrique (A Chene, Mónaco, 1911).
36
M. Ivanovich, R. S. Harmon Eds, Uranium-Series Disequilibrium: Applications to Earth, Marine, and Environmental Sciences (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, ed. 2, 1992).
37
Wedepohl K. H., The composition of the continental-crust. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59, 1217 (1995).
38
Kaufman A., An evaluation of several methods for determining 230Th/U ages in impure carbonates. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57, 2303 (1993).
39
Scholz D., Hoffmann D. L., 230Th/U-dating of fossil corals and speleothems. Quat. Sci. J. 57, 52 (2008).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 336 | Issue 6087
15 June 2012

Submission history

Received: 1 February 2012
Accepted: 25 April 2012
Published in print: 15 June 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a grant to A.W.G.P. from the Natural Environmental Research Council (NE/F000510/1). C. Taylor performed the sample preparation and assisted in collecting samples in the field along with C. Hinds, S. White, and S. Paine. We thank the governments of Asturias and Cantabria for granting permission to sample the cave art and B. Hanson for editorial guidance. The data described are presented in the supplementary materials.

Authors

Affiliations

A. W. G. Pike* [email protected]
Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Bristol, 43 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UU, UK.
D. L. Hoffmann
Bristol Isotope Group, School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK.
Centro Nacional de Investigatión sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH), Paseo Sierra de Atapuerca s/n, 09002 Burgos, Spain.
M. García-Diez
Department of Geography, Prehistory and Archaeology, University of Basque Country (UPV/EHU), c/ Tomás y Valiente s/n, 01006 Vitoria,Spain.
P. B. Pettitt
Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, Northgate House, West Street, Sheffield S1 4ET, UK.
J. Alcolea
Prehistory Section, University of Alcalá de Henares, c/ Colegios 2, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
R. De Balbín
Prehistory Section, University of Alcalá de Henares, c/ Colegios 2, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
C. González-Sainz
Department of Historic Sciences, University of Cantabria, Avenida Los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain.
C. de las Heras
Museo Nacional y Centro de Investigación de Altamira. 39330 Santillana del Mar, Cantabria, Spain.
J. A. Lasheras
Museo Nacional y Centro de Investigación de Altamira. 39330 Santillana del Mar, Cantabria, Spain.
R. Montes
Museo Nacional y Centro de Investigación de Altamira. 39330 Santillana del Mar, Cantabria, Spain.
J. Zilhão
University of Barcelona/Institució Catalana de Reserca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Departament de Prehistòria, Història Antiga i Arqueologia (SERP), c/ Montalegre 6, 08001 Barcelona, Spain.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Human remains in the Ardines karstic massif: Tito Bustillo and La Lloseta caves (Asturias, Spain), Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 48, (103881), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2023.103881
    Crossref
  2. Age estimates for the rock art at the Rocky Ridge site (Utah) based on archaeological and archaeometric evidence, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 48, (103875), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2023.103875
    Crossref
  3. Pigment spectroscopy analyses in Maltravieso cave, Spain, L'Anthropologie, 127, 1, (103116), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anthro.2022.103116
    Crossref
  4. Neanderthal habitat, culture, language, and intellect, Sex and Cohabitation Among Early Humans, (455-483), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819086-9.00003-8
    Crossref
  5. Hand stencils and communal history: A case study from Auwim, East Sepik, Papua New Guinea, Archaeology in Oceania, 58, 1, (115-130), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1002/arco.5287
    Crossref
  6. U‐Series Dating in Archaeology, Handbook of Archaeological Sciences, (89-97), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119592112.ch5
    Crossref
  7. The Sustainability of Rock Art: Preservation and Research, Sustainability, 14, 10, (6305), (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106305
    Crossref
  8. Mechanical Properties of Single-Crystal Calcite and Their Temperature and Strain-Rate Effects, Materials, 15, 13, (4613), (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134613
    Crossref
  9. Interatividade, Robótica e Arte, desde Altamira, DAT Journal, 7, 2, (20-30), (2022).https://doi.org/10.29147/datjournal.v7i2.607
    Crossref
  10. Artistic motivations are intrinsic, specific, and temporally stable by nature: Evidence from large real-life Brazilian public data between 1987–2004, Culture and Evolution, 19, 1, (68-80), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1556/2055.2022.00012
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media