Advertisement

Spider nursery

Mammals produce milk to feed their offspring, and maternal care often continues well after the young can forage for themselves. Though other cases of milk-like secretions have been found, this combination of ongoing maternal care has largely been considered a uniquely mammalian trait. Chen et al. describe an ant-mimicking jumping spider that secretes a nutritious milk-like substance on which its young offspring are entirely dependent. The spider also continues to care for the spiderlings as they mature and become independent. Thus, this type of maternal care may be more widespread than has been assumed.
Science, this issue p. 1052

Abstract

Lactation is a mammalian attribute, and the few known nonmammal examples have distinctly different modalities. We document here milk provisioning in a jumping spider, which compares functionally and behaviorally to lactation in mammals. The spiderlings ingest nutritious milk droplets secreted from the mother’s epigastric furrow until the subadult stage. Milk is indispensable for offspring survival in the early stages and complements their foraging in later stages. Maternal care, as for some long-lived vertebrates, continues after the offspring reach maturity. Furthermore, a female-biased adult sex ratio is acquired only when the mother is present. These findings demonstrate that mammal-like milk provisioning and parental care for sexually mature offspring have also evolved in invertebrates, encouraging a reevaluation of their occurrence across the animal kingdom, especially in invertebrates.
Parental food provisioning is often indispensable to an offspring’s growth, development, and survival (1, 2) and subsequently affects litter size, sex ratio, and offspring body size (3, 4). Foods provided by parents can be classified into three forms: direct food sources, regurgitation feedings, and specialized food sources (4). Specialized foods include mammalian milk, as well as trophic eggs in amphibians and invertebrates (46), epidermal mucus in fish (7), and milk in cockroaches (8) and pigeons (9). However, these other foods are very different from mammalian milk in both duration of provisioning and degree of parent-offspring interaction. Parental food provisioning often stops when offspring acquire foraging ability (4), and provisioning for nutritionally independent offspring has mainly been reported from longer-lived vertebrates (4, 10). Extended food provisioning frequently co-occurs with prolonged parental care, enhancing offspring fitness by providing assistance in foraging (11), teaching skills of foraging and competition (12), or influencing the morphology and behaviors of offspring (13). In extreme cases, parental care is extended to sexually mature offspring (4, 10), but this has only been recorded in long-lived social vertebrates (4). Prolonged care increases offspring fitness by enabling them to allocate more time for learning foraging and social skills (14), antipredator behaviors, and defense against nest parasites and for selecting mates (14, 15).
Toxeus magnus (Araneae: Salticidae) (16) is a jumping spider that mimics ants. The breeding nest is composed of either several large individuals (fig. S1), with two or more adults, or one adult female and several juveniles. This is a puzzling observation for a species assumed to be noncolonial and suggests that T. magnus might provide either prolonged maternal care or delayed dispersal. We thus questioned (i) whether T. magnus evolved long-lasting maternal care; (ii) if it has, whether the mother provides food for the offspring; (iii) what benefits could be gained from maternal care; and (iv) how long the mother provides an effective maternal care.
We first assessed how offspring developed and behaved under maternal care in laboratory conditions. No spiderlings were observed leaving the nest for foraging until they were 20.9 ± 1.2 days (N = 207, Nnest = 19; SEM) old, and the mother was never seen to bring food back to the nest during this period, but offspring body lengths increased continuously (from 0.9 mm at hatching to 3.5 mm at 20 days, N = 187). Closer observations revealed that the mother provided a seemingly nutritive fluid, hereafter called milk, to the offspring. During the first week, she deposited milk droplets, excreted from her epigastric furrow, on the nest’s internal surface. In response, spiderlings came and sucked the droplets (Fig. 1B). After the first week, milk deposition stopped and the offspring sucked directly from the mother’s epigastric furrow (Fig. 1C and movies S1 and S2). Although spiderlings sometimes left the nest to forage from about 20 days, milk sucking continued until they reached the subadult stage at 37.5 ± 1.3 days (N = 167) (Figs. 1C), with body length of 5.26 ± 0.06 mm (around 80% of adult body length). From 40 days, milk feeding stopped, but spiderlings still used the nest at night after reaching sexual maturity within the next 20 days. Adulthood was reached at 52.2 ± 0.6 days with a body length of 6.57 ± 0.06 mm (N = 145) (Fig. 1D and fig. S2). Milk provisioning in T. magnus involves a specialized organ over an extended period, differing markedly from cockroaches, which deposit nourishing substances to the brood sac of developing embryos (8). In these aspects, T. magnus milk provisioning is more similar to mammalian lactation.
Fig. 1 T. magnus offspring body length growth and food resources during development.
(A) Egg hatching. (B) Absolute milk dependence: Spiderlings do not leave the nest, and the mother releases milk droplets to the nest internal surface. (C) Spiderlings forage during the day and suck milk at night. (D) Subadults nutritionally independent but still return to nest. (E) Spiderlings reach sexual maturity, but some stay with the mother. *The mother. N = 207 offspring, Nnest = 19 surveyed nests, error bars (SEM).
Fig. 3 Offspring development from hatching to independence under different treatments.
MC (N = 187 offspring, Nnest = 19 surveyed nests), MR20 (N = 255 offspring, Nnest = 18 surveyed nests), MB20 (N = 101 offspring, Nnest = 8 surveyed nests), and milk blocked on the first day (MB1) (N = 62 offspring, Nnest = 5 surveyed nests). (A) Survival rate (surviving/hatched spiderlings). (B) Body length growth. (C) Foraging rate (foraged/surviving spiderlings). (D) Breeding nest departure rate (spiderlings that did not return to the breeding nest at night/surviving spiderlings). Error bars (SEM). (E) Life stages and food resource of spiderlings.
Observations under the microscope showed droplets leaking from the mother’s epigastric furrow where the spiderlings sucked milk (Fig. 2, A and B). Spider milk total sugar content was 2.0 mg/ml, total fat 5.3 mg/ml, and total protein 123.9 mg/ml, with the protein content around four times that of cow’s milk (17). We suggest this milk might have evolved from trophic eggs, unviable eggs functioning as a food for newly emerged offspring (18). The epigastric furrow is the egg-laying opening of spiders (6), and trophic eggs have evolved in diverse invertebrate taxa, including spiders (6). Trophic eggs are usually a one-time investment (4, 6), but mothers may also supply progressive trophic eggs, as in the burrower bug Adomerus triguttulus (18). However, progressive provisioning usually stops after hatching (19), whereas spider milk is supplied continuously from hatching to subadult.
Fig. 2 Spider milk and its secretion site in T. magnus.
(A) Ventral view of mother. (B) Milk droplets secreted after slight finger pressure on abdomen.
The mother continued nest maintenance throughout, carrying out spiderlings’ exuviae and repairing nest damage. When receiving both maternal care and milk, 76% of the hatched offspring survived to adulthood. We also recorded a highly female-biased adult sex ratio: 84.14% (122/145). Although the mother apparently treated all juveniles the same, only daughters were allowed to return to the breeding nest after sexual maturity. Adult sons were attacked if they tried to return. This may reduce inbreeding depression, which is considered to be a major selective agent for the evolution of mating systems (2022).
When we blocked the mother’s epigastric furrow immediately with correction fluid after hatchling emergence, the hatchlings stopped development and died 10.4 ± 0.5 days later (Fig. 3A and fig. S3), showing their complete dependence on the milk supply. A separate experiment showed that correction fluid did not affect spiderlings’ survivorship (fig. S6). We then tested why parental care and milk provisioning were continued after 20 days when the spiderlings were able to forage for themselves. We assessed the effects on survival, growth, foraging, and nest departure of (i) blocking the milk at this stage but leaving the mother in the nest to assess the effect of maternal care without milk provisioning and (ii) removing the mother from the nest to assess the combined effects of maternal care and milk provisioning. Removing the mother after 20 days significantly reduced survivorship (Fig. 3A) and body size (Fig. 3B) and increased foraging (Fig. 3C) and activities outside the nest (Fig. 3D). Blocking milk significantly reduced survivorship (Fig. 3A), but did not affect body size (Fig. 3B), and increased foraging (Fig. 3C) and activities outside the nest (Fig. 3D) compared with those receiving full maternal care and milk. Among spiderlings not receiving milk, those receiving maternal care survived significantly better (Fig. 3A), grew faster (Fig. 3B), and left the nest more rarely (Fig. 3D) than those without the mother, but both showed similar foraging frequency (Fig. 3C) (table S1 to S4). The milk-blocked spiderlings still attempted to suck milk from the mother (movie S3). These results show that from days 20 to 40, milk provisioning is not essential for spiderlings’ survival, as they can compensate by foraging more, but has a positive effect on survivorship and development in lab conditions. In the field, milk provisioning, by reducing time spent outside the nest, might also reduce predation risk, as smaller offspring are more prone to predation (23). When spiderlings did not have milk, the higher surviorship with their mother present might be mediated by parasites. Although not quantified, parasites were observed on juveniles commonly without maternal care but rarely when the mother was present. Nest cleaning and repairing by the mother may partly explain this reduction in parasite loads. Nest parasites are common in invertebrates (24, 25), and parental care usually plays a crucial role in reducing juvenile parasite infections (4, 10, 25).
Removing the mother at day 20 reduced the percentage of spiderlings reaching maturity [normal maternal care (MC) = 75.7 ± 4.6%; mother removed at 20 days (MR20) = 50.4 ± 5.3%] and reduced their adult body size (by 12%), whereas blocking milk did not change their adult survivorship [milk blocked at 20 days (MB20) = 73.8 ± 6.4%] or body size (MB20: 6.64 ± 0.07 mm) compared with the control (Fig. 4, A and D). Most notably, removing the mother greatly affected the adult sex ratio (female/total: MC = 0.84, MR20 = 0.50), whereas blocking milk did not (MB20 = 0.87) (Fig. 4C). Further analysis showed that the reduction of offspring body size after mother removal is not caused by a sex ratio change coupled with intersexual differences (table S6). No treatment impacted the timing of developmental stages (MR20: 52.5 ± 0.78 days, MB20: 50.5 ± 0.82 days, MC: 52.3 ± 0.60 days) (Fig. 4B and table S5). Thus, milk provisioning after 20 days does not affect adult survivorship, body size, sex ratio, and development time, but the mother’s presence plays a key role in assuring high adult survival and normal body size. This may reflect the parasite defense discussed above. The mother’s presence is also required for achieving the female-biased sex ratio of adult offspring. Sex role divergence theory suggests that the reproductive value of a population is heavily determined by the sex that invests more in parental care (2628). In T. magnus, the mother invests much more than the male invests, predicting a female-biased sex ratio to be optimal for reproductive success with a polygamous mating system. Unequal adult sex ratios could be passively induced, as with the selective mortality with respect to sex in the bark beetle Dendroctonus ponderosae (29), or maternally induced, as in the spider Oedothorax gibbosus (30), but the mechanisms remain largely unclear.
Fig. 4 Adult condition after three different treatments (MC, MB20, and MR20) of juveniles.
(A) Survival of offspring to adult stage. (B) Development duration (days from hatching to maturity). (C) Adult sex ratio (mature males/total number of matured juveniles). (D) Adult body length. NMC = 145 offspring, NMR20 = 121 offspring, NMB20 = 71 offspring, error bars (SEM). The letters “a” and “b” summarize the statistical grouping.
In mammals, lactation is likely an adaptation mitigating an uncertain access to food resource as a juvenile and compensating for low probabilities for future reproduction (31). More generally, food provisioning helps promote offspring fitness by reducing risks linked to self-feeding (32). In nonmammals, we suggest that the most important ecological conditions favoring the evolution of lactation might be predation risk and uncertain food access. As a response, the mother’s physiology, behavior, and cognition might have changed to adapt to providing milk and prolonged maternal care as in mammals (33). Extended parental care could have evolved in invertebrates as a response to complex and harsh living environments that require offspring skills (e.g., hunting, predator defense) to be fully developed before complete independence. Another aspect to investigate is whether lactation and extended parental care are accompanied by a reduction in offspring number because of milk production and parental care costs. Lastly, we anticipate that the discoveries presented in this study will encourage a reevaluation of the evolution of lactation and its occurrence across the animal kingdom.

Acknowledgments

We thank an anonymous referee and A. Jordan, L. Li, G. Liu, X. Yao, U. Gelin, X. Wang, and J. Chen for suggestions, X. Yang for equipment assistance, the Central Laboratory and Horticulture Department at XTBG for spider collection and maintenance, and Z. Wang and P. Wen for spider milk analysis. Funding: Work was supported by NSFC (no. 31370452) and CAS 135 and CAS-SEABRI (no. 2017 XTBG-F03). Author contributions: Z.C., R.C.Q., and X.J. designed experiments. Z.C. collected data and wrote the original manuscript. R.T.C., T.C.D., and R.C.Q. revised manuscripts and figures. S.J.L. analyzed data. S.Z. and H.L. assisted experiments. R.L. and C.L. analyzed milk composition. Competing interests: We declare no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials.

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S6
Tables S1 to S7
Captions for Movies S1 to S3
References (34)

Resources

File (aat3692_chen_sm.pdf)
File (aat3692s1.mp4)
File (aat3692s2.mp4)
File (aat3692s3.mp4)

References and Notes

1
T. E. Martin, Food as a Limit on Breeding Birds: A Life-History Perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18, 453–487 (1987).
2
J. K. Christians, Avian egg size: Variation within species and inflexibility within individuals. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 77, 1–26 (2002).
3
J. S. Millar, Energetics of Reproduction in Peromyscus Leucopus: The Cost of Lactation. Ecology 59, 1055–1061 (1978).
4
N. J. Royle, P. T. Smiseth, M. Kölliker, The Evolution of Parental Care (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).
5
J. C. Perry, B. D. Roitberg, Trophic egg laying: Hypotheses and tests. Oikos 112, 706–714 (2006).
6
R. Foelix, Biology of Spiders (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).
7
J. Buckley, R. J. Maunder, A. Foey, J. Pearce, A. L. Val, K. A. Sloman, Biparental mucus feeding: A unique example of parental care in an Amazonian cichlid. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 3787–3795 (2010).
8
B. Stay, A. C. Coop, ‘Milk’ secretion for embryogenesis in a viviparous cockroach. Tissue Cell 6, 669–693 (1974).
9
H. Beams, R. Meyer, The Formation of Pigeon “Milk”. Physiol. Zool. 4, 486–500 (1931).
10
T. H. Clutton-Brock, The Evolution of Parental Care (Princeton Univ. Press, 1991).
11
D. K. Scott, Functional aspects of prolonged parental care in Bewick’s swans. Anim. Behav. 28, 938–952 (1980).
12
A. L. Engh, K. Esch, L. Smale, K. E. Holekamp, Mechanisms of maternal rank ‘inheritance’ in the spotted hyaena, Crocuta crocuta. Anim. Behav. 60, 323–332 (2000).
13
A. Attisano, R. M. Kilner, Parental effects and flight behaviour in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. Anim. Behav. 108, 91–100 (2015).
14
N. B. Davies, J. A. Welbergen, Social transmission of a host defense against cuckoo parasitism. Science 324, 1318–1320 (2009).
15
C. Brown, K. Laland, Social learning and life skills training for hatchery reared fish. J. Fish Biol. 59, 471–493 (2001).
16
S. Saito, Trans., Sapporo Nat. Hist. Soc. 13, 32–61 (1933).
17
United States Department of Agriculture, (USDA), “Food Composition Database UPC: 763528306046,” https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/search/list, [last accessed on 26/09/2018].
18
S. Kudo, T. Nakahira, Effects of trophic-eggs on offspring performance and rivalry in a sub-social bug. Oikos 107, 28–35 (2004).
19
T. Nakahira, Production of trophic eggs in the subsocial burrower bug Admerus-triguttulus. Naturwissenschaften Naturwissenschaften 81, 413–414 (1994).
20
M. Szulkin, K. V. Stopher, J. M. Pemberton, J. M. Reid, Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals? Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 205–211 (2013).
21
D. Charlesworth, M. T. Morgan, B. Charlesworth, Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44, 1469–1489 (1990).
22
K. J. F. Verhoeven, M. Macel, L. M. Wolfe, A. Biere, Population admixture, biological invasions and the balance between local adaptation and inbreeding depression. Proc. Biol. Sci. 278, 2–8 (2010).
23
J. N. Huang, R. C. Cheng, D. Li, I. M. Tso, Salticid predation as one potential driving force of ant mimicry in jumping spiders. Proc. Biol. Sci. 278, 1356–1364 (2010).
24
T. Parmentier, W. Dekoninck, T. Wenseleers, Context-dependent specialization in colony defence in the red wood ant Formica rufa. Anim. Behav. 103, 161–167 (2015).
25
A. M. Boulton, G. A. Polis, Brood Parasitism among Spiders: Interactions between Salticids and Diguetia mojavea. Ecology 83, 282–287 (2002).
26
H. Kokko, M. D. Jennions, Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 919–948 (2008).
27
M. D. Jennions, L. Fromhage, Not all sex ratios are equal: The Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 372, 20160312 (2017).
28
D. M. Ramsey, A large population parental care game: Polymorphisms and feedback between patterns of care and the operational sex ratio. J. Theor. Biol. 266, 675–690 (2010).
29
L. E. N. Lachowsky, M. L. Reid, Developmental mortality increases sex-ratio bias of a size-dimorphic bark beetle. Ecol. Entomol. 39, 300–308 (2014).
30
B. Vanthournout, K. Deswarte, H. Hammad, T. Bilde, B. Lambrecht, F. Hendrickx, Flow cytometric sexing of spider sperm reveals an equal sperm production ratio in a female-biased species. Biol. Lett. 10, 20140159 (2014).
31
S. R. X. Dall, I. L. Boyd, Evolution of mammals: Lactation helps mothers to cope with unreliable food supplies. Proc. Biol. Sci. 271, 2049–2057 (2004).
32
A. Gardner, P. T. Smiseth, Evolution of parental care driven by mutual reinforcement of parental food provisioning and sibling competition. Proc. Biol. Sci. 278, 196–203 (2010).
33
C. M. Lefèvre, J. A. Sharp, K. R. Nicholas, Evolution of lactation: Ancient origin and extreme adaptations of the lactation system. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 11, 219–238 (2010).
34
D. Bates, M. Maechler, Package ‘lme4 (2010). http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 362 | Issue 6418
30 November 2018

Submission history

Received: 16 March 2018
Accepted: 29 October 2018
Published in print: 30 November 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank an anonymous referee and A. Jordan, L. Li, G. Liu, X. Yao, U. Gelin, X. Wang, and J. Chen for suggestions, X. Yang for equipment assistance, the Central Laboratory and Horticulture Department at XTBG for spider collection and maintenance, and Z. Wang and P. Wen for spider milk analysis. Funding: Work was supported by NSFC (no. 31370452) and CAS 135 and CAS-SEABRI (no. 2017 XTBG-F03). Author contributions: Z.C., R.C.Q., and X.J. designed experiments. Z.C. collected data and wrote the original manuscript. R.T.C., T.C.D., and R.C.Q. revised manuscripts and figures. S.J.L. analyzed data. S.Z. and H.L. assisted experiments. R.L. and C.L. analyzed milk composition. Competing interests: We declare no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials.

Authors

Affiliations

Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yunnan, 666303, China.
Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yunnan, 666303, China.
Center for Behavioral Ecology and Evolution, College of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China.
Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yunnan, 666303, China.
Tristan Charles-Dominique https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5767-0406
Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yunnan, 666303, China.
Shichang Zhang
Center for Behavioral Ecology and Evolution, College of Life Sciences, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China.
Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yunnan, 666303, China.
Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, Yunnan, China.
Chengbo Long
Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, Yunnan, China.
Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yunnan, 666303, China.

Funding Information

Notes

*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Milk provisioning in oviparous caecilian amphibians, Science, 383, 6687, (1092-1095), (2024)./doi/10.1126/science.adi5379
    Abstract
  2. Arachnomadology: A Zoētic Framework for Queering Stories of Spider Sex, Life, and Death, Australian Feminist Studies, 37, 111, (1-20), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2022.2051165
    Crossref
  3. Socially transferred materials: why and how to study them, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2022.11.010
    Crossref
  4. Mirror image stimulation could reverse social-isolation-induced aggressiveness in the high-level subsocial lactating spider, Animal Cognition, 25, 5, (1345-1355), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01618-4
    Crossref
  5. Parental Care, Animal Behaviour, (243-280), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82879-0_11
    Crossref
  6. Maternal care in Mid-Cretaceous lagonomegopid spiders, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 288, 1959, (20211279), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1279
    Crossref
  7. A chromosome-level genome of the spider Trichonephila antipodiana reveals the genetic basis of its polyphagy and evidence of an ancient whole-genome duplication event , GigaScience, 10, 3, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giab016
    Crossref
  8. Love and longevity: A Social Dependency Hypothesis, Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology, 8, (100088), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpnec.2021.100088
    Crossref
  9. Two sexes respond equally to food restriction in a sexually dimorphic but not body mass dimorphic jumping spider, Ecology and Evolution, 11, 20, (14033-14041), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8112
    Crossref
  10. Molecular evolution of gland cell types and chemical interactions in animals, Journal of Experimental Biology, 223, Suppl_1, (2020).https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.211938
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media