Moira Burke
Robert Kraut
Cameron Marlow
ABSTRACT
Though social network site use is often treated as a monolithic activity, in which all time is equally social and its impact the same for all users, we examine how Facebook affects social capital depending upon: (1) types of site activities, contrasting one-on-one communication, broadcasts to wider audiences, and passive consumption of social news, and (2) individual differences among users, including social communication skill and self-esteem. Longitudinal surveys matched to server logs from 415 Facebook users reveal that receiving messages from friends is associated with increases in bridging social capital, but that other uses are not. However, using the site to passively consume news assists those with lower social fluency draw value from their connections. The results inform site designers seeking to increase social connectedness and the value of those connections.
- Allan, G. (1979). A Sociology of Friendship and Kinship. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
- Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). "On the Internet No One Knows I'm an Introvert": Extroversion, Neuroticism, and Internet Interaction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 125--128.Google Scholar
- Bargh, J., McKenna, K., & Fitzsimons, G. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. J. Social Issues, 58(1), 33--48.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, Males and Females, Scientists and Mathematicians. J. Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5--17.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bessiére, K., Kiesler, S., Kraut, R., & Boneva, B. (2008). Effects of Internet Use and Social Resources on Changes in Depression. Information, Communication & Society, 11(1), 47--70.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. C. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241--258). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
- Burke, M., Kraut, R., Williams, D. (2010). Social use of computer-mediated communication by adults on the autism spectrum. In Proc. CSCW 2010: 425--434. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. In Proc. CHI 2010: 1902--1912. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Caplan, S. (2005). A social skill account of problematic Internet use. J. Communication, 55(4), 721.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95--120.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Collins, N., & Miller, L. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457--475.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook "Friends": Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. JCMC, 12(4), 143--1168.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (In press). Connection Strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, E., & Karahalios, K. (2009). Predicting tie strength with social media. Proc. CHI 2009, 211--220. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goldsmith, D., & Baxter, L. (1996). Constituting relationships in talk: A taxonomy of speech events in social and personal relationship. Human Communication Research, 23(1), 87--114.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6), 1360.Google Scholar
- Hampton, K. N., Sessions, L. F., & Her, E. J. (2009). Social Isolation and New Technology. Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
- Hancock, J., Toma, C., and Fenner, K. 2008. I know something you don't: the use of asymmetric personal information for interpersonal advantage. In Proc. CSCW'08. ACM, New York: 413--416. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1998). Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. J. the American Society for Information Science, 49(12), 1101--1114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Holmes T., and Rahe R. (1967). The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. J Psychosomatic Research 11(2): 213--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katz, J., & Aspden, P. (1997). A nation of strangers? Communications of the ACM, 40(12), 81--86. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keele, L., & Kelly, N. (2006). Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables. Political Analysis, 14(2), 186--205.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Knapp, M. L., & Vangeslisti, A. L. (2003). Interpersonal communication and human relationships (Vol. 5). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J. N., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. M. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. J. Social Issues, 58(1), 49--74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017--1031.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Landers, R., & Lounsbury, J. (2006). An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 283--293. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marlow, Cameron (2009). Maintained Relationships on Facebook. Retrieved from http://overstated.net/2009/03/09/maintained-relationships-on-facebook.Google Scholar
- McKenna, K., & Bargh, J. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity "demarginalization" through virtual group participation. J. Personality & Social Psychology, 75(3), 681--694.Google Scholar
- McKenna, K., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? J. Social Issues, 58(1), 9--31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mikami, A., Szwedo, D., Allen, J., Evans, M., & Hare, A. (2010). Adolescent Peer Relationships and Behavior Problems Predict Young Adults' Communication on Social Networking Websites. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 46.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oswald, D. L., Clark, E. M., & Kelly, C. M. (2004). Friendship Maintenance: An Analysis of Individual and Dyad Behaviors. J. Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(3), 413--441.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Papacharissi, Z., & Mendelson, A. Toward a New (er) Sociability: Uses, Gratifications, and Social Capital on Facebook. Paper presented at the Internet Research conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, October 2008.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image (Rev. ed.). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University.Google Scholar
- Shklovski, I., Kraut, R., & Rainie, L. (2004). The Internet and social participation: Contrasting cross-sectional and longitudinal Analyses. JCMC, 10(1).Google Scholar
- Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. (2009). Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students' Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation1. JCMC, 14(4), 875--901.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2007). Internet communication and its relation to well-being: Identifying some underlying mechanisms. Media Psychology, 9(1), 43--58.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication research, 23(1), 3.Google Scholar
- Wellman, B., Quan Haase, A., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436--455.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 558--588.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Williams, D. (2006). On and off the 'net: Scales for social capital in an online era. JCMC, 11(2).Google Scholar
- Zhao, S. (2006). Do Internet users have more social ties? A call for differentiated analyses of Internet use. JCMC, 11(3), 844.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
-
Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users
-
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
-
Building social capital with Facebook: Type of network, availability of other media, and social self-efficacy matter#
Highlights- Type of friends affects building social capital via Facebook and traditional media.
AbstractFindings about Facebook's effect on relationships are mixed, possibly due to lack of models that acknowledge differences across users, types of their friends, and use of competing media. To address this, we proposed and tested how ...
-
Social network activity and social well-being
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsPrevious research has shown a relationship between use of social networking sites and feelings of social capital. However, most studies have relied on self-reports by college students. The goals of the current study are to (1) validate the common self-...
-
Identifying social capital in the facebook interface
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsA number of studies have identified a robust relationship between the use of social network sites, particularly Facebook, and positive outcomes such as social capital. Social network site use is often measured as a function of use frequency, network ...
Comments