- Baker, M. (2012). Databases fight funding cuts: online tools are becoming ever more important to biology, but financial support is unstable. Nature, 489(7414):19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bechhofer, S., Horrocks, I., Goble, C., and Stevens, R. (2001). OilEd: a reason-able ontology editor for the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of the Joint German/Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vienna. Springer-Verlag LNAI Vol. 2174, pp 396--408. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cardoso, J. (2007). The Semantic Web vision. Where are we? IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(5):84--88. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Crubézy, M. and Musen, M. A. (2004). Ontologies in support of problem solving. In: Staab, S. and Studer, R. eds. Handbook on Ontologies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 321--341.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eriksson, H., Puerta, A. R., and Musen, M. A. (1994). Generation of knowledge-acquisition tools from domain ontologies. International Journal of Human--Computer Studies, 41:425--453. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eriksson, H., Shahar, Y., Tu, S. W., Puerta, A. R., and Musen, M. A. (1995). Task modeling with reusable problem-solving methods. Artificial Intelligence, 79:293--326. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Friedland, P. E., and Iwasaki, Y. (1985). The concept and implementation of skeletal plans. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 1(2):161--208.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ghazvinian, A., Noy, N. F., and Musen, M. A. (2009). Creating mappings for ontologies in biomedicine: simple methods work. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Symposium. American Medical Informatics Association, San Francisco, CA, pp. 198--202.Google Scholar
- Gennari, J. H., Musen, M. A., Fergerson, R. W., Grosso, W. E., Crubézy, M., Eriksson, H., Noy, N. F., and Tu, S. W. (2003). The evolution of Protégé: An environment for knowledge-based systems development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(1):89--123. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guarino, N., and Musen, M. A. (2015). Applied Ontology: The next decade begins. Applied Ontology, 10(1):1--4.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Horridge, M. (2011). A Practical Guide To Building OWL Ontologies Using Protégé 4 and CO-ODE Tools. Edition 1.3. http://mowl-power.cs.man.ac.uk/protegeowltutorial/resources/ProtegeOWLTutorialP4_v1_3.pdf.Google Scholar
- Knublauch, H., Fergerson, R. W., Noy, N. F., Musen, M. A. (2004). The Protégé OWL plugin: an open development environment for Semantic Web applications. In: Third International Conference on the Semantic Web, Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 229--243.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mortensen, J. M., Minty, E. P., Januszyk, M., Sweeney, T. E., Rector, A. L., Noy, N. F., and Musen, M. A. (2014). Using the wisdom of the crowds to find critical errors in biomedical ontologies: A study of SNOMED CT. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002901.Google Scholar
- Musen, M. A. (1989). Automated Generation of Model-Based Knowledge-Acquisition Tools. London: Pitman, Artificial Intelligence Research Notes Series. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Musen, M. A. (2005). Protégé: Community is everything. International Journal of Human--Computer Studies, 62(5):545--552. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Musen, M. A., Fagan, L. M., Combs, D. M., and Shortliffe, E. H. (1987). Use of a domain model to drive an interactive knowledge-editing tool. International Journal of Man--Machine Studies, 26:105--121. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Musen, M. A., Tu, S. W., Das, A. K., and Shahar, Y. (1996). EON: A component-based approach to automation of protocol-directed therapy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 3:367--388.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Neches, R., Fikes, R. E., Finin, T., Gruber, T. R., Patil, R., Senator, T., and Swartout, W. (1991). Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. Al Magazine, 12(3):36--56. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Noy, N. F. and Musen, M. A. (2003). The PROMPT suite: Interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. International Journal of Human--Computer Studies, 59(6):983--1024. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Noy, N. F., Sintek, M., Decker, S., Crubézy, M., Fergerson, R. W., and Musen, M. A. (2001). Creating Semantic Web contents with Protégé-2000. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2):60--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Noy, N. F., de Coronado, S., Solbrig, H., Fragoso, G., Hartel, F. W. and Musen, M. A. (2008). Representing the NCI Thesaurus in OWL DL: Modeling tools help modeling languages. Applied Ontology, 3(3):173--190, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Parikh, P. P., Zheng, J., Logan-Klumpler, F., Stoeckert, C. J. Jr., Louis, C., Topalis, P., Protasio, A. V., Sheth, A. P., Carrington, M., Berriman, M., and Sahoo, S. S. (2012). The Ontology for Parasite Lifecycle (OPL): towards a consistent vocabulary for lifecycle stages in parasitic organisms. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 3:5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schreiber, G., Akkermans, H., Anjewierden, A., de Hoog, R., Shadbolt, N., Van de Velde, W., and Wielinga, B. (2000). Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stein, A., Musen, M. A., and Shahar, Y. (1996). Knowledge acquisition for temporal abstraction. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Fall Symposium. Washington, DC, pp. 204--208.Google Scholar
- Storey, M.-A., Musen, M. A., Silva, J., Best, C., Ernst, N., Fergerson, R., Noy, N. (2001). Jambalaya: Interactive visualization to enhance ontology authoring and knowledge acquisition in Protégé. In: Workshop on Interactive Tools for Knowledge Capture, First International Conference on Knowledge Capture. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 35--43.Google Scholar
- Strohmaier, M., Walk, S., Pöschko, J., Lamprecht, D., Tudorache, T., Nyulas, C., Musen, M. A., Noy, N. F. (2013). How ontologies are made: Studying the hidden social dynamics behind collaborative ontology-engineering projects. Journal of Web Semantics, 20:18--34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tu, S. W., Kahn, M. G., Musen, M. A., Ferguson, J. C., Shortliffe, E. H., and Fagan, L. M. (1989). Episodic skeletal-plan refinement based on temporal data. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 32:1439--1455. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tudorache, T., Falconer, S. M., Nyulas, C. I., Noy, N. F., Musen, M. A. (2010). Will Semantic Web technologies work for the development of ICD-11? In: Ninth International Semantic Web Conference, Shanghai, China. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tudorache, T. and Musen, M. A. (2011). Collaborative development of large-scale biomedical ontologies. In: Ekins, S., Hupcey, M. A. Z., and Williams, A. J., eds. Collaborative Computational Technologies for Biomedical Research. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Zhang, Y., Tudorache, T., Horridge, M., and Musen, M. A. (2015). Helping users bootstrap ontologies: an empirical investigation. Computer--Human Interaction, Seoul, Korea. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
-
The protégé project: a look back and a look forward
-
Recommendations
-
Weaving the biomedical Semantic Web with the Protégé OWL plugin
KRMED'14: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Formal Biomedical Knowledge Representation - Volume 102In this document we show how biomedical resources can be linked into a Semantic Web using Protégé. Protégé is a widely-used open-source ontology modeling environment with support for the Web Ontology Language (OWL). With the example domain of brain ...
-
Application of Protégé and SPARQL in the Field of Project Knowledge Management
ICSNC '07: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Systems and Networks CommunicationsProtégé is a set of open-source ontology design software developed in Stanford Medical Informatics. SPARQL (Protocol and RDF Query Language) is recommended by W3C, to represent the RDF (Resource Description Framework) graph -- a set of triples that ...
-
The protégé OWL plugin: an open development environment for semantic web applications
LNCS-ISWC'04: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Semantic Web ConferenceWe introduce the OWL Plugin, a Semantic Web extension of the Protégé ontology development platform. The OWL Plugin can be used to edit ontologies in the Web Ontology Language (OWL), to access description logic reasoners, and to acquire instances for ...
Comments