Full text loading...
Review Article
Free
Political Responses to Economic Shocks
- Yotam Margalit1
- Vol. 22:277-295 (Volume publication date May 2019) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-110713
- First published as a Review in Advance on January 23, 2019
-
Copyright © 2019 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved
Abstract
How does the experience of economic shocks affect individuals' political views and voting behavior? Inspired partly by the fallout of the financial crisis of 2008, research on this question has proliferated. Findings from studies covering a broadening range of countries and economic contexts highlight several notable patterns. Economic shocks—e.g., job loss or sharp drop in income—exert a significant and theoretically predictable, if often transient, effect on political attitudes. In contrast, the effect on voting behavior is more limited in magnitude and its manifestations less understood. Negative economic shocks tend to increase support for more expansive social policy and for redistribution, strengthening the appeal of the left. But such shocks also tend to decrease trust in political institutions, thus potentially driving the voters to support radical or populist parties, or demobilizing them altogether. Further research is needed to detect the conditions that lead to these distinct voting outcomes.
Article metrics loading...
Literature Cited
- Ahlquist J, Copelovitch M, Walter S 2018. The political consequences of economic shocks. Evidence from Poland CIS Work. Pap. 97 Cent. Comp. Int. Stud., Univ. Zurich Zurich, Switz.:
- Alesina A, Giuliano P 2011. Preferences for redistribution. Handbook of Social Economics 1A J Benhabib, A Bisin, MO Jackson 93–132 Amsterdam: North-Holland
- Alesina A, La Ferrara E 2005. Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. J. Public Econ. 89:897–931
- Algan Y, Guriev S, Papaioannou E, Passari E 2017. The European trust crisis and the rise of populism. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. 2017:2309–400 https://muse.jhu.edu/article/688908/pdf
- Alt JE, Jensen A, Larreguy HA, Lassen DD, Marshall J 2017. Contagious political concerns: Identifying unemployment shock information transmission using the Danish Population Network Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association San Francisco CA: Aug. 31–Sept. 3. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/jmarshall/files/unemployment_and_networks_v10.pdf
- Anderson CJ 2007. The end of economic voting? Contingency dilemmas and the limits of democratic accountability. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 10:271–96
- Angrist JD, Pischke J-S 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
- Autor DH, Dorn D, Hanson GH 2013. The China syndrome: local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:2121–68
- Autor DH, Dorn D, Hanson G, Majlesi K 2016. Importing political polarization? NBER Work. Pap. 22637
- Bagues M, Esteve-Volart B 2016. Politicians luck of the draw: evidence from the Spanish Christmas lottery. J. Political Econ. 124:1269–94
- Ballard-Rosa C, Malik M, Rickard S, Scheve K 2017. The economic origins of authoritarian values: evidence from local trade shocks in the United Kingdom Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Political Economy Society Nov. 17–18 Austin, TX:
- Barr A, Miller L, Ubeda P 2016. Moral consequences of becoming unemployed. PNAS 113:4676–81
- Bartels LM 2014. Ideology and retrospection in electoral responses to the Great Recession. Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession L Bartels, N Bermeo 185–223 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
- Bartolini S 2007. The political mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980: The Class Cleavage New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Bechtel MM, Hainmueller J 2011. How lasting is voter gratitude? An analysis of the short- and long-term electoral returns to beneficial policy. Am. J. Political Sci. 55:852–68
- Brunner E, Ross SL, Washington E 2011. Economics and policy preferences: causal evidence of the impact of economic conditions on support for redistribution and other ballot proposals. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93:888–906
- Campbell A, Converse PE, Miller WE, Stokes DE 1960. The American Voter Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
- Charles KK, Stephens MJr. 2013. Employment, wages, and voter turnout. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 5:111–43
- Che Y, Lu Y, Pierce JR, Schott PK, Tao Z 2017. Does trade liberalization with China influence U.S. elections? NBER Work. Pap. 22178
- Chen J 2013. Voter partisanship and the effect of distributive spending on political participation. Am. J. Political Sci. 57:200–17
- Colantone I, Stanig P 2018a. Global competition and Brexit. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 112:201–18
- Colantone I, Stanig P 2018b. The trade origins of economic nationalism: import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. Am. J. Political Sci. 2:4936–53
- Cruces G, Perez-Truglia R, Tetaz M 2013. Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: evidence from a survey experiment. J. Public Econ. 98:100–12
- Danckert B 2017. Facing unemployment: personal and vicarious unemployment experiences generate favourable perceptions of unemployed people. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 33:779–90
- Dancygier R, Donnelly M 2014. Attitudes toward immigration in good times and bad. Mass Politics in Tough times: Opinions, Votes, and Protest in the Great Recession L Bartels, N Bermeo, 148–84 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
- Davis SJ, Von Wachter T, Hall RE, Rogerson R 2011. Recessions and the costs of job loss NBER Work. Pap. 17638
- De La O A 2013. Do conditional cash transfers affect electoral behavior? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Mexico. Am. J. Political Sci. 57:1–14
- Dehdari S 2018. Economic distress and support for far-right parties—evidence from Sweden Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Aug. 30–Sept. 2 Boston, MA:
- Dippel C, Gold R, Heblich S 2015. Globalization and its (dis-)content: Trade shocks and voting behavior NBER Work. Pap. 23209
- Doherty D, Gerber AS, Green DP 2006. Personal income and attitudes toward redistribution: a study of lottery winners. Political Psychol 27:441–58
- Duch RM, Stevenson RT 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Durante R, Putterman L, Van der Weele J 2014. Preferences for redistribution and perception of fairness: an experimental study. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 12:1059–86
- Dustmann C, Eichengreen B, Otten S, Sapir A, Tabellini G, Zoega G 2017. Europe's trust deficit: causes and remedies CEPR Work. Pap. Monit. Int. Integr. Ser. No. 1 Cent. Econ. Policy Res. Washington, DC:
- Emmenegger P, Marx P, Schraff D 2015. Labour market disadvantage, political orientations and voting: how adverse labour market experiences translate into electoral behaviour. Soc.-Econ. Rev. 13:189–213
- Emmenegger P, Marx P, Schraff D 2017. Off to a bad start: unemployment and political interest during early adulthood. J. Politics 79:315–28
- Esarey J, Salmon T, Barrilleaux C 2012. Social insurance and income redistribution in a laboratory experiment. Political Res. Q. 65:685–98
- Fernández-Albertos J, Kuo A 2015. Income perception, information, and progressive taxation: evidence from a survey experiment. Political Sci. Res. Methods 6:183–110
- Fernández-Albertos J, Kuo A 2016. Economic hardship and policy preferences in the Eurozone periphery: evidence from Spain. Comp. Political Stud. 49:874–906
- Fisman R, Jakiela P, Kariv S 2015. How did distributional preferences change during the Great Recession. J. Public Econ. 128:84–95
- Gay C 2012. Moving to opportunity: the political effects of a housing mobility experiment. Urban Affairs Rev 48:147–79
- Gerber A, Green D 1999. Misperceptions about perceptual bias. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 2:189–210
- Giuliano P, Spilimbergo A 2013. Growing up in a recession. Rev. Econ. Stud. 81:787–817
- Golder M 2016. Far right parties in Europe. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 19:477–97
- Gourevitch P 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
- Guiso L, Herrera H, Morelli M, Sonno T 2017. Demand and supply of populism Work. Pap. 610 Innocenzo Gasparini Inst. Econ. Res., Bocconi Univ. Milan, Italy: ftp://ftp.igier.unibocconi.it/wp/2017/610.pdf
- Hacker JS, Rehm P, Schlesinger M 2013. The insecure American: economic experiences, financial worries, and policy attitudes. Perspect. Politics 11:23–49
- Hainmueller J, Hopkins DJ 2014. Public attitudes toward immigration. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 17:225–49
- Hall AB, Yoder J, Karandikar N 2017. Economic distress and voting: evidence from the subprime mortgage crisis Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Chicago, IL:
- Häusermann S, Kurer T, Schwander H 2014. High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences. Soc.-Econ. Rev. 13:235–58
- Healy A, Lenz GS 2017. Presidential voting and the local economy: evidence from two population-based data sets. J. Politics 79:1419–32
- Healy A, Malhotra N 2013. Retrospective voting reconsidered. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 16:285–306
- Hibbs DA 1977. Political parties and macroeconomic policy. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 71:1467–87
- Hobolt SB, De Vries C 2016. Turning against the union? The impact of the crisis on the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European Parliament elections. Electoral Stud 44:504–14
- Hobolt SB, Tilley J 2016. Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis. West Eur. Politics 39:971–91
- Hout M, Brooks C, Manza J 1993. The persistence of classes in post-industrial societies. Int. Sociol. 8:259–77
- Iversen T, Soskice D 2001. An asset theory of social policy preferences. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 95:875–93
- Iyengar S, Westwood SJ 2015. Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization. Am. J. Political Sci. 59:690–707
- Jensen JB, Quinn DP, Weymouth S 2017. Winners and losers in international trade: the effects on US presidential voting. Int. Organ. 71:423–57
- Karadja M, Mollerstrom J, Seim D 2017. Richer (and holier) than thou? The effect of relative income improvements on demand for redistribution. Rev. Econ. Stat. 99:201–12
- Korpi W 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
- Kriesi H, Grande E, Lachat R, Dolezal M, Bornschier S et al. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Krosnick JA, Alwin DF 1989. Aging and susceptibility to attitude change. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57:416
- Kuziemko I, Norton MI, Saez E, Stantcheva S 2015. How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:1478–508
- Lee W, Roemer JE 2006. Racism and redistribution in the United States: a solution to the problem of American exceptionalism. J. Public Econ. 90:1027–52
- Malgouyres C 2017. Trade shocks and far-right voting: evidence from French presidential elections Res. Pap. RSCAS 2017/21 Robert Schuman Cent. Advanced Stud., European University Inst. Fiesole, Italy:
- Malhotra N, Margalit Y 2010. Short-term communication effects or longstanding dispositions? The public's response to the financial crisis of 2008. J. Politics 72:852–67
- Manacorda M, Miguel E, Vigorito A 2011. Government transfers and political support. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 3:1–28
- Mares I 2006. Taxation, Wage Bargaining, and Unemployment New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Margalit Y 2011. Costly jobs: trade-related layoffs, government compensation, and voting in US elections. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 105:166–88
- Margalit Y 2012. Lost in globalization: international economic integration and the sources of popular discontent. Int. Stud. Q. 56:484–500
- Margalit Y 2013. Explaining social policy preferences: evidence from the Great Recession. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107:80–103
- Martén L 2019. Demand for redistribution: individuals' response to economic shocks. Scand. J. Econ. 121:1225–42
- Marx K 2010 (1904). A contribution to the critique of political economy. Marx Today91–94 New York: Palgrave Macmillan
- Marx P, Nguyen C 2016. Are the unemployed less politically involved? A comparative study of internal political efficacy. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 32:634–48
- McConnell C, Margalit Y, Malhotra N, Levendusky M 2018. The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era. Am. J. Political Sci. 62:5–18
- Meltzer AH, Richard SF 1981. A rational theory of the size of government. J. Political Econ. 89:914–27
- Mudde C 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Gov. Opposition 39:541–63
- Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction New York: Oxford Univ. Press
- Naumann E, Buss C, Bähr J 2015. How unemployment experience affects support for the welfare state: a real panel approach. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 32:81–92
- Neundorf A, Soroka S 2018. The origins of redistributive policy preferences: political socialisation with and without a welfare state. West Eur. Politics 41:400–27
- Newcomb TM 1967. Persistence and Change: Bennington College and Its Students After Twenty-Five Years New York: Wiley
- Norris P 2005. Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
- O'Grady T 2017. How do economic circumstances determine preferences? Evidence from long-run panel data. Br. J. Political Sci. Nov:1–26
- Oreopoulos P, von Wachter T, Heisz A 2012. The short- and long-term career effects of graduating in a recession. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 4:1–29
- Owens LA, Pedulla DS 2013. Material welfare and changing political preferences: the case of support for redistributive social policies. Soc. Forces 92:1087–113
- Page BI, Shapiro RY 2010. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
- Peterson E 2016. The rich are different: the effect of wealth on partisanship. Political Behav 38:33–54
- Pop-Eleches C, Pop-Eleches G 2012. Targeted government spending and political preferences. Q. J. Political Sci. 7:285–320
- Powdthavee N, Oswald AJ 2014. Does money make people right-wing and inegalitarian? A longitudinal study of lottery winners IZA Disc. Pap. 7934 Inst. Labor Econ. Bonn:
- Redlawsk DP 2002. Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. J. Politics 64:1021–44
- Rogowski R 1987. Political cleavages and changing exposure to trade. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 81:1121–37
- Rueda D 2007. Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Advanced Industrialized Democracies New York: Oxford Univ. Press
- Schlozman KL, Verba S 1979. Insult to Injury: Unemployment, Class, and Political Response Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
- Schwandt H, von Wachter T 2017. Unlucky cohorts: earnings, income, and mortality effects from entering the labor market in a recession Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Calif. Los Angeles: https://www.cemfi.es/ftp/pdf/papers/pew/Schwandt_vonWachter_Cohorts_final.pdf
- Taber CS, Lodge M 2006. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am. J. Political Sci. 50:755–69
- Tilley J, Neundorf A, Hobolt SB 2018. When the pound in people's pocket matters: how changes to personal financial circumstances affect party choice. J. Politics 80:555–69
- Wright JR 2012. Unemployment and the democratic electoral advantage. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 106:685–702
- Zucco C 2013. When payouts pay off: conditional cash transfers and voting behavior in Brazil 2002–10. Am. J. Political Sci. 57:810–22
- Article Type: Review Article
Most Read This Month
Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed
-
-
-
-
Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse
Vol. 11 (2008), pp. 303–326
-
-
-
-
-
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Vol. 22 (2019), pp. 129–146
-
-
-
-
-
Public Attitudes Toward Immigration
Vol. 17 (2014), pp. 225–249
-
-
-
-
-
Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes
Vol. 3 (2000), pp. 183–219
-
- More Less