Full text loading...
Review Article
Free
The Return of the Single-Country Study
- Thomas B. Pepinsky1
- Vol. 22:187-203 (Volume publication date May 2019) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051017-113314
- First published as a Review in Advance on January 11, 2019
-
Copyright © 2019 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved
Abstract
This article reviews the changing status of single-country research in comparative politics, a field defined by the concept of comparison. An analysis of single-country research published in top general interest and comparative politics journals reveals that single-country research has evolved from an emphasis on description and theory generation to an emphasis on hypothesis testing and research design. This change is a result of shifting preferences for internal versus external validity combined with the quantitative and causal inference revolutions in the social sciences. A consequence of this shift is a change in substantive focus from macropolitical phenomena to micro-level processes, with consequences for the ability of comparative politics to address many substantive political phenomena that have long been at the center of the field.
Article metrics loading...
Literature Cited
- Ahram AI, Kollner P, Sil R 2018. Comparative Area Studies: Methodological Rationales and Cross-Regional Applications New York: Oxford Univ. Press
- Angrist JD, Pischke J-S 2010. The credibility revolution in empirical economics: how better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. J. Econ. Perspect. 24:3–30
- Aronow PM, Samii C 2016. Does regression produce representative estimates of causal effects?. Am. J. Political Sci. 60:250–67
- Bates RH 1996. Letter from the president: area studies and the discipline. APSA-CP Newsl. APSA Organ. Sect. Comp. Politics 7:1–2
- Berman S 1997. Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics 49:401–29
- Bonvecchi A, Simison E 2017. Legislative institutions and performance in authoritarian regimes. Comp. Politics 49:521–44
- Briggs R 2017. Explaining case selection in African politics research. J. Contemp. Afr. Stud. 35:565–72
- Calvo E, Micozzi JP 2005. The governor's backyard: a seat-vote model of electoral reform for subnational multiparty races. J. Politics 67:1050–74
- Cammett M 2020. Positive deviance cases: their value for development research, policy and practice. The Case for Case Studies: Methods and Applications in International Development J Widner, M Woolcock, D Ortega Nieto New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Chandra K 2015. Redefining the relationship with the field: why graduate students should avoid the two to four week model of fieldwork. Comp. Politics Newsl. 25:7–9
- Cirone A, Van Coppenolle B 2018. Cabinets, committees, and careers: the causal effect of committee service. J. Politics 80:3948–63
- Collier D, Mahoney J 1996. Insights and pitfalls: selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics 49:56–91
- Cruz C, Labonne J, Querubin P 2017. Politician family networks and electoral outcomes: evidence from the Philippines. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:103006–37
- Dahlberg S, Holmberg S, Rothstein B, Pachon NA, Svensson R 2018. The quality of government basic dataset Dataset, Qual. Gov. Inst., Univ. Gothenburg, Swed., updated Jan. http://www.qog.pol.gu.se
- Dube O, Naidu S 2015. Bases, bullets, and ballots: the effect of US military aid on political conflict in Colombia. J. Politics 77:249–67
- Dunning T 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Dunning T, Grossman G, Humphreys M, Hyde S, McIntosh C, Nellis G 2019. Information, Accountability, and Cumulative Learning: Lessons from Metaketa I New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. In press
- Eckstein H 1975. Case studies and theory in political science. Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 1: Political Science: Scope and Theory FI Greenstein, NW Polsby 94–137 Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
- Feenstra RC, Inklaar R, Timmer MP 2015. The next generation of the Penn World Table. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:3150–82
- Geddes B 1990. How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: selection bias in comparative politics. Political Anal 2:131–50
- Geddes B 2015. Training for both skills and substance. Comp. Politics Newsl. 25:9–11
- Gehlbach S 2015. The fallacy of multiple methods. Comp. Politics Newsl. 25:11–12
- George A, Bennett A 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
- Gerring J 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Gerring J 2012. Mere description. Br. J. Political Sci. 42:721–46
- Gerring J, McDermott R 2007. An experimental template for case study research. Am. J. Political Sci. 51:688–701
- Gervasoni C 2010. A rentier theory of subnational regimes: fiscal federalism, democracy, and authoritarianism in the Argentine provinces. World Politics 62:302–40
- Hainmueller J, Hangartner D 2013. Who gets a Swiss passport? A natural experiment in immigrant discrimination. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107:159–87
- Huang H 2015. Propaganda as signaling. Comp. Politics 47:419–37
- Jackman RW 1985. Cross-national statistical research and the study of comparative politics. Am. J. Political Sci. 29:161–82
- Klein RA, Ratliff KA, Vianello M, Adams RB, Bahník Š et al. 2014. Investigating variation in replicability: a “many labs” replication project. Soc. Psychol. 45:142–52
- Laitin DD 2003. Comparative politics: the state of the subdiscipline. Political Science: The State of the Discipline H Milner, I Katznelson 630–59 New York: W.W. Norton
- Levy JS 2008. Case studies: types, designs, and logics of inference. Confl. Manag. Peace Sci. 25:1–18
- Lieberman ES 2005. Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 99:435–52
- Lyall J 2010. Are coethnics more effective counterinsurgents? Evidence from the Second Chechen War. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 104:1–20
- Malesky EJ 2008. Battling onward: the debate over field research in developmental economics and its implications for comparative politics. Qual. Methods 6:17–21
- Munck GL, Snyder R 2007. Debating the direction of comparative politics: an analysis of leading journals. Comp. Political Stud. 40:5–31
- Obermeier K, Pepinsky TB 2018. Dataset on methodology in comparative politics Dataset, Version 1.0, Harvard Dataverse Cambridge, MA: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UCBNEH
- Paler L 2013. Keeping the public purse: an experiment in windfalls, taxes, and the incentives to restrain government. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107:706–25
- Parkinson SE 2013. Organizing rebellion: rethinking high-risk mobilization and social networks in war. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107:418–32
- Pepinsky TB 2014. Context and method in Southeast Asian politics. Pac. Aff. 87:441–61
- Schedler A, Mudde C 2010. Data usage in quantitative comparative politics. Political Res. Q. 63:417–33
- Shair-Rosenfield S 2012. The alternative incumbency effect: electing women legislators in Indonesia. Elect. Stud. 31:576–87
- Snyder R 2001. Scaling down: the subnational comparative method. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 36:93–110
- Stokes SC, Dunning T, Nazareno M, Brusco V 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
- Szanton DL 2002. The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
- Thelen K, Mahoney J 2015. Comparative-historical analysis in contemporary political science. Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis J Mahoney, K Thelen 3–36 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
Data & Media loading...
- Article Type: Review Article
Most Read This Month
Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed
-
-
-
-
Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse
Vol. 11 (2008), pp. 303–326
-
-
-
-
-
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Vol. 22 (2019), pp. 129–146
-
-
-
-
-
Public Attitudes Toward Immigration
Vol. 17 (2014), pp. 225–249
-
-
-
-
-
Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes
Vol. 3 (2000), pp. 183–219
-
- More Less