Hermaphroditism is a derived and polyphyletic condition in fishes, documented in about 2% of all extant teleost species scattered across more than 20 taxonomic families in 9 orders. It shows a variety of expressions that can be categorized into sequential and synchronous modes. Among the sequential hermaphrodites are protogynous species in which an individual begins reproductive life as a female and later may switch to male, protandrous species in which a fish starts as a male and later may switch to female, and serial bi-directional sex changers. Among the synchronous hermaphrodites (in which an individual can simultaneously produce eggs and sperm) are several outcrossing and one predominantly selfing species. A few species also consist of mixtures of hermaphroditic and single-sex individuals. All of these reproductive categories have been the subject of numerous theoretical and empirical treatments from an evolutionary perspective. Here we highlight some of the major conclusions from these studies, which collectively have been informative on a variety of biological topics related to reproductive modes, gender allocations, sexual conflict and gamesmanship, mating systems, and life-history tradeoffs.

1.
Allard RW: The mating system and microevolution. Genetics 79:115–126 (1975).
2.
Allsop DJ, West SA: Constant relative age and size at sex change for sequentially hermaphroditic fish. J Evol Biol 16:921–929 (2003).
3.
Avise JC: Clonality: The Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution of Sexual Abstinence in Vertebrate Animals (Oxford University Press, New York, 2008).
4.
Axelrod R, Hamilton WD: The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396 (1981).
5.
Baker HG: Self-compatibility and establishment after ‘long-distance’ dispersal. Evolution 9:137–149 (1955).
6.
Barrett SCH: The evolution of mating strategies in flowering plants. Trends Plant Sci 3:335–341 (1998).
7.
Breder CM, Rosen DE: Modes of Reproduction in Fishes (Natural History Press, Garden City, NJ 1966).
8.
Bull JJ, Charnov EL: On irreversible evolution. Evolution 39:1149–1155 (1985).
9.
Charlesworth D: Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biol J Linn Soc 22:333–348 (1984).
10.
Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B: A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am Nat 112:975–997 (1978).
11.
Charnov EL: The Theory of Sex Allocation (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1982).
12.
Charnov EL: Size advantage may not always favor sex change. J Theor Biol 119:283–285 (1986).
13.
Charnov EL, Maynard Smith J, Bull JJ: Why be an hermaphrodite? Nature 263:125–126 (1976).
14.
Cole KS: Patterns of gonad structure in hermaphroditic gobies (Teleostei: Gobiidae). Environ Biol Fish 28:125–142 (1990).
15.
Cole KS, Hoese DF: Gonad morphology, colony demography and evidence for hermaphroditism in Gobiodon okinawae (Teleostei, Gobiidae). Environ Biol Fish 28:125–142 (2001).
16.
Cole KS, Shapiro DY: Social facilitation and sensory mediation of adult sex change in a cryptic, benthic marine goby. J Exp Marine Biol Ecol 186:65–75 (1995).
17.
Fischer EA: Sexual allocation in a simultaneously hermaphroditic coral reef fish. Am Nat 117:64–82 (1981).
18.
Fischer EA: Local mate competition and sex allocation in simultaneous hermaphrodites. Am Nat 124:590–596 (1984).
19.
Fischer EA, Petersen CW: The evolution of sexual patterns in the seabasses. BioScience 37:482–489 (1987).
20.
Fishelson L: Protogynous sex reversal in the fish Anthias squamipinnis (Teleostei, Anthiidae), regulated by the presence or absence of a male fish. Nature 227:90–91 (1970).
21.
Francis RC: Sexual lability in teleosts: developmental factors. Quart Rev Bio 67:1–18 (1992).
22.
Fricke H, Fricke S: Monogamy and sex change by aggressive dominance in coral reef fish. Nature 266:830–832 (1977).
23.
Ghiselin MT: The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. Quart Rev Biol 44:189–208 (1969).
24.
Ghiselin MT: Sexual selection in hermaphrodites: where did our ideas come from? Integr Comp Biol 46:368–372 (2006).
25.
Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG: The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:47–79 (2005).
26.
Harrington RW: Oviparous hermaphroditic fish with internal self-fertilization. Science 134:1749–1750 (1961).
27.
Harrington RW, Kallman KD: The homozygosity of clones of the self-fertilizing hermaphroditic fish Rivulus marmoratus (Cyprinodontidae, Atheriniformes). Am Nat 102:337–343 (1967).
28.
Hastings PA, Petersen CW: A novel sexual pattern in serranid fishes: simultaneous hermaphrodites and secondary males in Serranus fasciatus. Environ Biol Fish 15:59–68 (1986).
29.
Heath DJ: Simultaneous hermaphroditism; cost and benefit. J Theor Biol 64:363–373 (1977).
30.
Hoffman SG, Schildhauer MP, Warner RR: The costs of changing sex and the ontogeny of males under contest competition for mates. Evolution 39:915–927 (1985).
31.
Iwasa Y: Sex change evolution and cost of reproduction. Behav Ecol 2:56–68 (1991).
32.
Jacobs MS, Wade MJ: A synthetic review of the theory of gynodioecy. Am Nat 161:837–851 (2003).
33.
Jarne P, Auld JR: Animals mix it up too: The distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 60:1816–1824 (2006).
34.
Jarne P, Charlesworth D: The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphroditic plants and animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:441–466 (1993).
35.
Kobayashi K, Suzuki K: Hermaphroditism and sexual function in Cirrhitichthys aureus and other Japanese hawkfishes (Cirrhitidae: Teleostei). Jap J Ichthy 38:397–410 (1992).
36.
Kuwamura T, Yogo Y, Nakashima Y: Size-assortative monogamy and parental egg care in a coral goby Paragobiodon echinocephalus. Ethology 95:65–75 (1993).
37.
Kuwamura T, Nakashima Y, Yogo Y: Sex change in either direction by growth rate advantage in a monogamous coral goby Paragobiodon echinocephalus. Behav Ecol 5:434–438 (1994).
38.
Leonard JL: The hermaphrodite’s dilemma. J Theor Biol 147:361–371 (1990).
39.
Leonard JL: Sexual conflict in simultaneous hermaphrodites: evidence from serranid fishes. Environ Biol Fish 36:135–148 (1993).
40.
Leonard JL: Sexual selection: lessons from hermaphrodite mating systems. Integr Comp Biol 46:349–367 (2006).
41.
Lloyd DG: The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica45:325–339 (1975).
42.
Lutnesky MMF: Density-dependent protogynous sex change in territorial-haremic fishes: models and evidence. Behav Ecol 5:375–383 (1994).
43.
Mackiewicz M, Tatarenkov A, Taylor DS, Turner BJ, Avise JC: Extensive outcrossing and androdioecy in a vertebrate species that otherwise reproduces as a self-fertilizing hermaphrodite. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9924–9928 (2006a).
44.
Mackiewicz M, Tatarenkov A, Turner BJ, Avise JC: A mixed-mating strategy in a hermaphroditic vertebrate. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:2449–2452 (2006b).
45.
Mank JE, Promislow DEL, Avise JC: Evolution of alternative sex-determining mechanisms in teleost fishes. Biol J Linn Soc 87:83–93 (2006).
46.
Miura S, Komatsu T, Higa M, Bhandari RK, Nakamura S, Nakamura M: Gonadal sex differentiation in protandrous anemone fish, Amphiprion clarkii. Fish Physiol Biochem 28:165–166 (2003).
47.
Moe MA: Biology of the red grouper Epinephelus morio (Valenciennes) from the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Florida Dept. Nat Res Lab, Prof Papers 10:1–95 (1969).
48.
Munday PL: Bi-directional sex change: testing the growth-rate advantage model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:247–254 (2002).
49.
Munday PL, Molony BW: Energetic costs of protogyny versus protandry in the bidirectional sex changing fish, Gobiodon histrio. Marine Biol 141:1011–1017 (2002).
50.
Munday PL, Caley MJ, Jones GP: Bi-directional sex change in a coral-dwelling goby. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:371–377 (1998).
51.
Muñoz RC, Warner RR: A new version of the size-advantage hypothesis for sex change: incorporating sperm competition and size-fecundity skew. Am Nat 161:749–761 (2003).
52.
Muñoz RC, Warner RR: Testing a new version of the size-advantage hypothesis for sex change: sperm competition and size skew effects in the bucktooth parrotfish, Sparisoma radians. Behav Ecol 15:129–136 (2004).
53.
Nakamura M, Kobayashi Y, Miura S, Alam MA, Bhandari RK: Sex change in coral reef fish. Fish Physiol Biochem 31:117–122 (2005).
54.
Nakashima Y, Kuwamura T, Yogo Y: Why be a both-ways sex changer. Ethology 101:301–307 (1995).
55.
Nakashima Y, Kuwamura T, Yogo Y: Both-ways sex change in monogamous coral gobies, Gobiodon spp. Environ Biol Fish 46:281–288 (1996).
56.
Nikolski GV: The Ecology of Fishes (Academic Press, London 1963).
57.
Pannell JR: A hypothesis for the evolution of androdioecy: the joint influence of reproductive assurance and local mate competition in a metapopulation. Evol Ecol 14:195–211 (2000).
58.
Pauly D: Darwin’s Fishes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004).
59.
Petersen CW: Reproductive behaviour and gender allocation in Serranus fasciatus, a hermaphroditic reef fish. Anim Behav 35:1601–1614 (1987).
60.
Petersen CW: Variation in reproductive success and gonadal allocation in the simultaneous hermaphrodite Serranus fasciatus. Oecologia 83:62–67 (1990).
61.
Petersen CW: Sex allocation in hermaphroditic sea basses. Am Nat 138:650–667 (1991).
62.
Petersen CW: Reproductive behavior, egg trading, and correlates of male mating success in the simultaneous hermaphrodite, Serranus tabacarius. Environ Biol Fish 43:351–361 (1995).
63.
Petersen CW, Fischer EA: Mating system of the hermaphroditic coral-reef fish, Serranus baldwini. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:171–178 (1986).
64.
Petersen CW, Fischer EA: Intraspecific variation in sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite: the effect of individual size. Evolution 50:636–645 (1996).
65.
Policansky D: Sex change in plants and animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:471–495 (1982).
66.
Robertson DR: Social control of sex reversal in coral reef fish. Science 177:1007–1009 (1972).
67.
Robertson DR, Warner RR: Sexual patterns in the labroid fishes of the western Caribbean, 2: the parrotfishes (Scaridae). Smithson Contrib Zool 255:1–26 (1978).
68.
Robertson DR, Reinboth R, Bruce RW: Gonochorism, protogynous sex-change and spawning in three sparisomatinine parrotfishes from the western Indian Ocean. Bull Mar Sci 32:868–879 (1982).
69.
Ross RM: The evolution of sex-change mechanisms in fishes. Environ Biol Fish 29:81–93 (1990).
70.
Ross RM, Losey GS, Diamond M: Sex change in a coral-reef fish: dependence of stimulation and inhibition on relative size. Science 221:574–575 (1983).
71.
Shapiro DY: Social behavior, group structure, and the control of sex reversal in hermaphroditic fish. Adv Stud Behav 10:43–102 (1979).
72.
Shapiro DY: Differentiation and evolution of sex change in fishes: A coral reef fish’s social environment can control its sex. BioScience 37:490–497 (1987).
73.
Shapiro DY, Lubbock R: Group sex ratio and sex reversal. J Theor Biol 82:411–426 (1980).
74.
Smith CL: Contribution to a theory of hermaphroditism. J Theor Biol 17:76–90 (1967).
75.
Smith CL: The evolution of hermaphroditism in fishes, in Reinboth R (ed): Intersexuality in the Animal Kingdom, pp 295–310 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1975).
76.
St Mary CM: Novel sexual patterns in two simultaneously hermaphroditic gobies, Lythrypnus dalli and Lythrypnus zebra. Copeia 1993:1062–1072 (1993).
77.
St Mary CM: Sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite, the blue-banded goby (Lythrypnus dalli): the effects of body size and behavioural gender and the consequences for reproduction. Behav Ecol 5:304–313 (1994).
78.
St Mary CM: Sequential patterns of sex allocation in simultaneous hermaphrodites: do we need models that specifically incorporate this complexity? Am Nat 150:73–97 (1997).
79.
Sunobe T, Nakazono A: Sex change in both directions by alteration of social dominance in Trimma okinawae (Pisces: Gobiidae). Ethology 94:339–345 (1993).
80.
Taborsky M: Alternative reproductive tactics in fish, in Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ (eds): Alternative Reproductive Tactics, pp 251–299 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008).
81.
Tomlinson JT: The advantages of hermaphroditism and parthenogenesis. J Theor Biol 11:54–58 (1966).
82.
Warner RR: The adaptive significance of sequential hermaphroditism in animals. Am Nat 109:61–82 (1975).
83.
Warner RR: Mating systems, sex change, and sexual demography in the rainbow wrasse, Thalassoma lucasanum. Copeia 3:653–661 (1982).
84.
Warner RR: Mating behavior and hermaphroditism in coral reef fishes. Am Sci 72:128–136 (1984).
85.
Warner RR: Sex change in fishes: hypotheses, evidence, and objections. Environ Biol Fish 22:81–90 (1988).
86.
Warner RR, Hoffman SG: Local population size as a determinant of mating system and sexual composition in two tropical marine fishes (Thalassoma sp.). Evolution 34:508–518 (1980).
87.
Warner RR, Robertson DR: Sexual patterns in the labroid fishes of the western Caribbean, 1: the wrasses (Labridae). Smithson Contrib Zool 254:1–27 (1978).
88.
Warner RR, Swearer SE: Social control of sex change in the bluehead wrasse, Thalassoma bifasciatum (Pisces: Labridae). Biol Bull 181:199–204 (1991).
89.
Warner RR, Robertson DR, Leigh EG: Sex change and sexual selection. Science 190:633–638 (1975).
90.
Weeks SC, Benvenuto C, Reed SK: When males and hermaphrodites coexist: a review of androdioecy in animals. Integr Comp Biol 46:449–464 (2006).
91.
Wolf DE, Takebayashi N: Pollen limitation and the evolution of androdioecy from dioecy. Am Nat 163:122–137 (2004).
92.
Wu G-C, Du J-L, Lee Y-H, Lee, M-F, Chang C-F: Current status of genetic and endocrine factors in the sex change of protandrous black porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegeli (Teleostean). Ann NY Acad Sci 1040:206–214 (2005).
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.