Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online March 23, 2015

Usability and Safety in Electronic Medical Records Interface Design: A Review of Recent Literature and Guideline Formulation

Abstract

Objective

The objectives of this study were to (a) review electronic medical record (EMR) and related electronic health record (EHR) interface usability issues, (b) review how EMRs have been evaluated with safety analysis techniques along with any hazard recognition, and (c) formulate design guidelines and a concept for enhanced EMR interfaces with a focus on diagnosis and documentation processes.

Background

A major impact of information technology in health care has been the introduction of EMRs. Although numerous studies indicate use of EMRs to increase health care quality, there remain concerns with usability issues and safety.

Method

A literature search was conducted using Compendex, PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases to find EMR research published since 2000. Inclusion criteria included relevant English-language papers with subsets of keywords and any studies (manually) identified with a focus on EMR usability.

Results

Fifty studies met the inclusion criteria. Results revealed EMR and EHR usability problems to include violations of natural dialog, control consistency, effective use of language, effective information presentation, and customization principles as well as a lack of error prevention, minimization of cognitive load, and feedback. Studies focusing on EMR system safety made no objective assessments and applied only inductive reasoning methods for hazard recognition.

Conclusion

On the basis of the identified usability problems and structure of safety analysis techniques, we provide EMR design guidelines and a design concept focused on the diagnosis process and documentation.

Application

The design guidelines and new interface concept can be used for prototyping and testing enhanced EMRs.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Abramson E. L., Patel V., Malhotra S., Pfoh E. R., Nena Osorio S., Cheriff A., . . . Kaushal R. (2012). Physician experiences transitioning between an older versus newer electronic health record for electronic prescribing. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 81, 539–548.
Ahmed A., Chandra S., Herasevich V., Gajic O., Pickering B. W. (2011). The effect of two different electronic health record user interfaces on intensive care provider task load, errors of cognition, and performance. Critical Care Medicine, 39, 1626–1634.
American Society for Quality Control Statistics Division. (1983). Glossary and tables for statistical quality control (2nd ed.). Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press.
Ammenwerth E., Shaw N. (2004). Bad informatics can kill: Is evaluation the answer? Methods of Information in Medicine, 44(1), 1–3.
Bahr N. (1997). System safety engineering and risk assessment: A practical approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Bates D. W., Gawande A. A. (2003). Improving safety with information technology. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 2526–2534.
Belden J. L., Grayson R., Barnes J. (2009). Defining and testing EMR usability: Principles and proposed methods of EMR usability evaluation and rating. Chicago, IL: Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society.
Ben-Daya M. (2009). Failure mode and effect analysis. In Ben-Daya M., Duffuaa S. O., Raouf A., Knezevic J., Ait-Kadi D. (Eds.), Handbook of maintenance management and engineering (pp. 75–90). London, UK: Springer.
Bouamrane M. M., Mair F. S. (2013). A study of general practitioners’ perspectives on electronic medical records systems in NHSScotland. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(1), 58.
Bowman S. (2013). Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: Quality and safety implications. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 10(Fall), 1c.
Caudill-Slosberg M., Weeks W. B. (2005). Case study: Identifying potential problems at the human/technical interface in complex clinical systems. American Journal of Medical Quality, 20, 353–357.
Chaudhry B., Wang J., Wu S., Maglione M., Mojica W., Roth E., . . . Shekelle P. G. (2006). Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144, 742–752.
Chen W., Akay M. (2011). Developing EMRs in developing countries. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 15, 62–65.
Chin B., Sakuda C. (2012). Transforming and improving healthcare through meaning use of health information technology. Hawaii Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 71(4 Suppl. 1), 50–55.
Clarke M. A., Steege L. M., Moore J. L., Belden J. L., Koopman R. J., Kim M. S. (2013). Addressing human computer interaction issues of electronic health record in clinical encounters. In Marcus A. (Ed.), Design, user experience, and usability: Health, Learning, Playing, Cultural, and Cross-Cultural User Experience (pp. 381–390). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Craig D., Farrell G. (2010). Designing a physician-friendly interface for an electronic medical record system. In Fred A. L. N., Filipe J., Gamboa H. (Eds.), HEALTHINF (pp. 324–329).
Dix A., Finlay J., Abowd G., Bealle R. (2004). Human–computer interaction (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
Edmund L. C. S., Ramaiah C. K., Gulla S. P. (2009). Electronic medical records management systems: An overview. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 29(6), 3–12.
Edwards P. J., Moloney K. P., Jacko J. A., Sainfort F. (2008). Evaluating usability of a commercial electronic health record: A case study. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 66, 718–728.
Garets D., Davis M. (2006). Electronic medical records vs. electronic health records: Yes, there is a difference. Policy white paper, HIMSS Analytics, Chicago, IL.
Garrett P., Seidman J. (2011). EMR vs EHR: What is the difference? Retrieved from http://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/electronic-health-and-medical-records/emr-vs-ehr-difference/
Graham T. A., Kushniruk A. W., Bullard M. J., Holroyd B. R., Meurer D. P., Rowe B. H. (2008). How usability of a web-based clinical decision support system has the potential to contribute to adverse medical events. In AMIA annual symposium proceedings (Vol. 2008, p. 257). Bethesda, MD: American Medical Informatics Association.
Hagstedt L. J., Rudebeck C. E., Petersson G. (2011). Usability of computerised physician order entry in primary care: Assessing ePrescribing with a new evaluation model. Informatics in Primary Care, 19, 161–168.
Harrington C., Wood R., Breuer J., Pinzon O., Howell R., Pednekar M., Zhu M., Zhang J. (2011). Using a unified usability framework to dramatically improve the usability of an EMR module. In AMIA annual symposium proceedings (Vol. 2011, p. 549). Bethesda, MD: American Medical Informatics Association.
Harrington L., Kennerly D., Johnson C. (2011). Safety issues related to the electronic medical record (EMR): Synthesis of the literature from the last decade, 2000–2009. Journal of Healthcare Management, 56, 31–41.
Harrington L., Porch L., Acosta K., Wilkens K. (2011). Realizing electronic medical record benefits: An easy-to-do usability study. Journal of Nursing Administration, 41, 331–335.
Hollin I., Griffin M., Kachnowski S. (2012). How will we know if it’s working? A multi-faceted approach to measuring usability of a specialty-specific electronic medical record. Health Informatics Journal, 18, 219–232.
Hyman D., Laire M., Redmond D., Kaplan D. W. (2012). The use of patient pictures and verification screens to reduce computerized provider order entry errors. Pediatrics, 130, e211–e219.
Indranoi C., Wyatt T., Li X. (2009). Development and usability of iCare: An electronic health record system. In Proceedings of the 2009 Industrial Engineering Research Conference (pp. 797–802). Norcross, GA: IIE.
International Organization for Standardization. (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) — Part 11: Guidance on usability (ISO 9241-11:1998). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
Jaspers M. W., Peute L. W., Lauteslager A., Bakker P. J. (2008). Pre-post evaluation of physicians’ satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 136, 303.
Jha A. K., DesRoches C. M., Campbell E. G., Donelan K., Rao S. R., Ferris T. G., . . . Blumenthal D. (2009). Use of electronic health records in US hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 1628–1638.
Kalogriopoulos N. A., Baran J., Nimunkar A. J., Webster J. G. (2009). Electronic medical record systems for developing countries: Review. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009: Annual International Conference of the IEEE (pp. 1730–1733). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Kumar S., Aldrich K. (2010). Overcoming barriers to electronic medical record (EMR) implementation in the US healthcare system: A comparative study. Health Informatics Journal, 16, 306–318.
Kuqi K., Eveleigh T., Holzer T., Sarkani S. (2012). Using design structure matrix for improving electronic medical record usability. In Systems Conference (SysCon), 2012 IEEE International (pp. 1–6). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Leveson N. (2004). A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science, 42, 237–270.
Lowry S. Z., Quinn M. T., Ramaiah M., Schumacher R. M., Patterson E. S., North R., . . . Abbott P. (2012). Technical evaluation, testing, and validation of the usability of electronic health records. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Lowry S. Z., Ramaiah M., Patterson E. S., Brick D., Gurses A. P., Ozok A., . . . Gibbons M. C. (2014). Integrating electronic health records into clinical workflow: An application of human factors modeling methods to ambulatory care. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
McGuire M. J., Noronha G., Samal L., Yeh H. C., Crocetti S., Kravet S. (2013). Patient safety perceptions of primary care providers after implementation of an electronic medical record system. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28, 184–192.
Méndez E. O., Ren S. (2012, May). Design of cyber-physical interface for automated vital signs reading in electronic medical records systems. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology (EIT) (pp. 1–10). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Miller G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Molich R., Nielsen J. (1990). Improving a human–computer dialogue. Communications of the ACM, 33, 338–348.
Nakano V. N. A. V. N., Tohyama V. N. (2009). Human centered design in medical fields. FUJITSU Scientific and Technical Journal, 45, 232–238.
O’Donnell H. C., Kaushal R., Barrón Y., Callahan M. A., Adelman R. D., Siegler E. L. (2009). Physicians’ attitudes towards copy and pasting in electronic note writing. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24, 63–68.
Omdahl T. P. (Ed.). (1988). Reliability, availability, and maintainability dictionary. Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press.
Pereira R., Duarte J., Salazar M., Santos M., Neves J., Abelha A., Machado J. (2012). Usability evaluation of electronic health record. In 2012 IEEE EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES) (pp. 359–364). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Reuss E., Naef R., Keller R., Norrie M. (2007). Physicians’ and nurses’ documenting practices and implications for electronic patient record design. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4799, 113–118.
Rodriguez N. J., Borges J. A., Murillo V., Ortiz J., Sands D. Z. (2002). A study of physicians’ interaction with text-based and graphical-based electronic patient record systems. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2002 (CBMS 2002) (pp. 357–360). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Rogers M. L., Sockolow P. S., Bowles K. H., Hand K. E., George J. (2013). Use of a human factors approach to uncover informatics needs of nurses in documentation of care. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82, 1068–1074.
Rose A., Schnipper J., Park E., Poon E., Li Q., Middleton B. (2005). Using qualitative studies to improve the usability of an EMR. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 38, 51–60.
Saitwal H., Feng X., Walji M., Patel V., Zhang J. (2010). Assessing performance of an electronic health record (EHR) using cognitive task analysis. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79, 501–506.
Schumacher R. M., Berkowitz L., Abramson P., Liebovitz D. (2010). Electronic health records: Physician’s perspective on usability. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting (pp. 816–820). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Shachak A., Hadas-Dayagi M., Ziv A., Reis S. (2009). Primary care physicians’ use of an electronic medical record system: A cognitive task analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24, 341–348.
Singh R., Servoss T., Kalsman M., Fox C., Singh G. (2004). Estimating impacts on safety caused by the introduction of electronic medical records in primary care. Informatics in Primary Care, 12, 235–242.
Sittig D. F., Singh H. (2012). Electronic health records and national patient-safety goals. New England Journal of Medicine, 367, 1854–1860.
Suebnukran S., Rittipakorn P., Thongyoi B., Boonpitak K., Wongsapai M., Pakdeesan P. (2013). Usability assessment of an electronic health record in a comprehensive dental clinic. SpringPlus, 2(1), 1–8.
Tasa U., Ozcan O., Yantac A., Unluer A. (2008). A case study on better iconographic design in electronic medical records’ user interface. Informatics for Health & Social Care, 33, 125–138.
Thielke S., Hammond K., Helbig S. (2007). Copying and pasting of examinations within the electronic medical record. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, S122–S128.
Vatnøy T. K., Vabo G., Fossum M. (2014). A usability evaluation of an electronic health record system for nursing documentation used in the municipality healthcare services in Norway. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on HCI in Business (pp. 690–699). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Ventura M., Battan A., Zorloni C., Abbiati L., Colombo M., Farina S., Tagliabue P. (2011). The electronic medical record: Pros and cons. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 24(S1), 163–166.
Viitanen J., Kuusisto A., Nykänen P. (2011, February). Usability of electronic nursing record systems: Definition and results from an evaluation study in Finland. In ITCH (pp. 333-338).
Walji M., Kalenderian E., Tran D., Kookal K., Nguyen V., Tokede O., White M., Vaderhobli R., Ramoni R., Stark P., Kimmes N., Schoonheim-Klein M., Patel V. (2013). Detection and characterization of usability problems in structured data entry interfaces in dentistry. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82, 128–138.
Weber-Jahnke J., Mason-Blakley F. (2012). On the safety of electronic medical records. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7151, 177–194.
Weir C., Hurdle J., Felgar M., Hoffman J., Roth B., Nebeker J. (2003). Direct text entry in electronic progress notes: An evaluation of input errors. Methods of Information in Medicine, 42, 61–67.
Weis J. M., Levy P. C. (2014). Copy, paste, and cloned notes in electronic health records: Importing content into electronic health records. Prevalence, benefits, risks, and best practice recommendations. CHEST Journal, 145, 632–638.
Wickens C. D., Carswell C. M. (1995). The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors, 37, 473–494.
Wilcox A., Chen Y.-H., Hripcsak G. (2011). Minimizing electronic health record patient-note mismatches. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18, 511–514.
Win K. T., Phung H., Young L., Tran M., Alcock C., Hillman K. (2004). Electronic health record system risk assessment: A case study from the MINET. Health Information Management, 33(2), 43–48.
Wu R., Orr M., Chignell M., Straus S. (2008). Usability of a mobile electronic medical record prototype: A verbal protocol analysis. Informatics for Health & Social Care, 33, 139–149.
Yamamoto L. G. (2014). Reducing Emergency department charting and ordering errors with a room number watermark on the electronic medical record display. Hawai’i Journal of Medicine & Public Health, 73, 322.
Yen P. Y., Bakken S. (2012). Review of health information technology usability study methodologies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19, 413–422.
Zhang J., Walji M. F. (2011). TURF: Toward a unified framework of EHR usability. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44, 1056–1067.
Zheng K., Padman R., Johnson M. (2007). User interface optimization for an electronic medical record system. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 129, 1058–1062.
Zopf-Herling K. (2011). Enhancing usability in EMR screen design. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 29, 679–691.

Biographies

Maryam Zahabi is a doctoral student in the Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at North Carolina State University. She received her MS in industrial and systems engineering in 2013 from Sharif University of Technology (Iran).
David Kaber is a professor of industrial engineering at North Carolina State University. He received his PhD in industrial engineering from Texas Tech University in 1996.
Manida Swangnetr is a lecturer of production technology at the Research Center in Back, Neck, Other Joint Pain and Human Performance at Khon Kaen University and an adjunct assistant professor of industrial engineering at North Carolina State University. She received her PhD in industrial engineering from North Carolina State University in 2010.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: March 23, 2015
Issue published: August 2015

Keywords

  1. electronic medical records
  2. electronic health records
  3. interface design
  4. usability
  5. systems safety
  6. literature review

Rights and permissions

© 2015, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 25850118

Authors

Affiliations

Maryam Zahabi
North Carolina State University, Raleigh
David B. Kaber
North Carolina State University, Raleigh
Manida Swangnetr
Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Notes

David B. Kaber, North Carolina State University, 400 Daniels Hall, 111 Lampe Drive, Raleigh, NC 27695-7906, USA; e-mail: [email protected].

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 9225

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 139 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 149

  1. Design and Development of Learning Management System Huemul for Teachi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Evaluating Clinician Performance with Electronic Medical Record System...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Response to Dr. Ross Koppel regarding “Electronic health record ‘gag c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. National survey of user-reported usability of electronic medical recor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Inpatient nurses’ preferences and decisions with risk information visu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Unintended consequences of the electronic health record and cognitive ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Electronic health record “gag clauses” and the prevalence of screensho...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Inpatient EHR User Experience and Hospital EHR Safety Performance
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Identifying Usability Challenges in Electronic Medication Administrati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Guidelines on human factors in critical situations 2023
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Validation of diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and stroke in e...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Effective and feasible interventions to improve structured EHR data re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Human factors and safety analysis methods used in the design and redes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Evolution – removing paper and digitising the hospital
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Syste...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Factors in integrating academic electronic medical records in nursing ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Electronic Health Records That Support Health Professional Reflective ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Exploring facilitators of the implementation of electronic health reco...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Documentation of adherence to infection prevention best practice in pa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Designing and implementing smart glass technology for emergency medica...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Utilisation of academic electronic medical records in pre-registration...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Usability of information systems: Experiences of outpatient physicians...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Development of an Application for Electronic Retrieval of Patient and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Efficiency and Safety of Electronic Health Records in Switzerland—A Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. World Heart Federation Roadmap for Digital Health in Cardiology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. State of the evidence on simulation-based electronic health records tr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  27. Precision Medicine in Solid Tumors: How Far We Traveled So Far?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. An optimization-based approach to assess non-interference in labeled a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Not another box to check! Using the UTAUT to explore nurses' psycholog...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Development of a Visualization Tool for Healthcare Decision-Making usi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Behavioral signs of an unintended error in nursing information sharing...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Inefficiencies of electronic medical record use by surgical healthcare...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. A pragmatic methodical framework for the user-centred development of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Artificial Intelligence and Big Data for COVID-19 Diagnosis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Electronic health records, mobile health, and the challenge of improvi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Electronic Health Records and Genomics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibili...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Blockchain-Based Architecture Design for Personal Health Record: Devel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Is Electronic Health Record Safety a Paradox?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Identifying Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) Usabili...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Systematic review of applied usability metrics within usability evalua...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. A Systematic Review of Methods for Medical Record Analysis to Detect A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Emergency Physician Perceptions of Electronic Health Record Usability ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Digital technologies: An exploratory study of their role in the resili...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. The essence of healthcare records: embedded electronic health record s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Iterative heuristic design of temporal graphic displays with clinical ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Obstacles and features of health information systems: A systematic lit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Evaluating Electronic Health Record Limitations and Time Expenditure i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Usability Evaluation of Police Mobile Computer Terminals: A Focus Grou...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Best Practices for Reducing Interface Errors in Electronic Medical Rec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Analysing EHR navigation patterns and digital workflows among physicia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  52. Dynamics of Physicians’ Trust in Fellow Health Care Providers and the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  53. Physician Well-being and the Future of Health Information Technology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Machine Learning for Detection of Correct Peripherally Inserted Centra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Design of Generalized Search Interfaces for Health Informatics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Association of Surgical Resident Wellness With Medical Errors and Pati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Electronic Health Records, Interoperability and Patient Safety in Heal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Clinician Perceptions on the Use of Free-Text Communication Orders
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Why Is the Electronic Health Record So Challenging for Research and Cl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Feeling and thinking: can theories of human motivation explain how EHR...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Smart about medications (SAM): a digital solution to enhance medicatio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Factors affecting the manual linking of clinical progress notes to pro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  63. The use of health information technology in renal transplantation: A s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Augmenting patient safety through participation by design – An assessm...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Assessing the information quality and usability of My Health Record wi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  66. Human-Computer Interaction, Usability, and Workflow
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Postpartum Note Template Implementation Demonstrates Adherence to Reco...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. The Time is Now: Informatics Research Opportunities in Home Health Car...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Evaluating Simplified Web Interfaces of Risk Models for Clinical Use: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. A Web Platform (MOSAICO) to Design, Perform, and Assess Collaborative ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Improving the Usability and Safety of Digital Health Systems: The Role...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Exploring Usability Issues of a Smartphone-Based Physician-to-Physicia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Gap between real-world data and clinical research within hospitals in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Format Effects of iPad Administration of Wechsler Adult Intelligence S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. Concerns of Primary Care Clinicians Practicing in an Integrated Health...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Enhancing Situation Awareness and Decision Making in Primary Care: Cli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. An information model‐based interface design method: A case study of cr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. The Relationship between the Nurses’ Perception of Electronic Health R...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Adoption of Electronic Medical Record in Hospitals in Indonesia based ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Résistance légitime sans technophobie : analyse des impacts de l'infor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. The Electronic Medical Record Has Ruined It All, Including the Physici...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Finding NEEMO: towards organizing smart digital solutions in orthopaed...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Electronic charts do not facilitate the recognition of patient hazards...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Augmented visualization cues on primary flight display facilitating pi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Implementation and early adaptation of patient-reported outcome measur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  86. Too much or too little? Investigating the usability of high and low da...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  87. Patient and family engagement in communicating with electronic medical...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. A Process of Acceptance of Patient Photographs in Electronic Medical R...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. ORÁO: RESTful Cloud-Based Ophthalmologic Medical Record for Chromatic ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. User Experiences and Satisfaction with an Electronic Health Record Sys...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. Cyber-Risk in Healthcare: Exploring Facilitators and Barriers to Secur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. A Comparison of the User Experiences of Primary Care Electronic Health...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Design for improved workflow
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. Embedding “Smart” Disease Coding Within Routine Electronic Medical Rec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. Perceived Electronic Health Record Usability as a Predictor of Task Lo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  96. An Automated Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources-Based 12-Lead ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. Human Factors and User Experience Issues with Ventricular Assist Devic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  98. Merits, features, and desiderata to be considered when developing elec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. Preventing iatrogenic gelatin anaphylaxis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  100. Contradictions in information technology mediated work in long-term ca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  101. Six habits of highly successful health information technology: powerfu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  102. Modelling the interactive behaviour of users with a medication safety ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  103. Association of Electronic Health Record Design and Use Factors With Cl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  104. Novel displays of patient information in critical care settings: a sys...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  105. Design Thinking as a Complement to Human Factors Engineering for Enhan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  106. Assessing the Quality of the Management of Tonsillitis among Australia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  107. Clinical Workflow and Human Factors
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  108. Considerations on the Usability of SClínico
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  109. Web System Prototype based on speech recognition to construct medical ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  110. Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  111. Going digital: a checklist in preparing for hospital-wide electronic m...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  112. Effectiveness of a Best Practice Alerts at Improving Hypertension Cont...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  113. Anesthesiology Control Tower—Feasibility Assessment to Support Transla...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  114. Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feasibility Assessment to Support Transl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  115. A Review of Measuring the Cognitive Workload of Electronic Health Reco...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  116. Identifying Electronic Health Record Usability And Safety Challenges I...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  117. Electronic Health Record Use Among American Neurotology Society Member...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  118. Electronic Health Records in Simulation Education
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  119. Adherence to recommended electronic health record safety practices acr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  120. Electronic Medical Records: Provotype visualisation maximises clinical...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  121. Future Steps in Practice and Research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  122. Multi-method laboratory user evaluation of an actionable clinical perf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  123. Evidence-Based Guidelines for Interface Design for Data Entry in Elect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  124. The Human Interface of Biomedical Informatics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  125. Safety and Usability Guidelines of Clinical Information Systems Integr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  126. Perceived critical success factors of electronic health record system ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  127. Electronic Health Records and Improved Patient Care: Opportunities for...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  128. Copy-Forward in Electronic Health Records: Lipstick on a Pig
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  129. Approaching the Design of an Information Display to Support Critical C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  130. Are informed policies in place to promote safe and usable EHRs? A cros...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  131. Clinical decisions support malfunctions in a commercial electronic hea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  132. Unintended Consequences of EHR Systems: A Narrative Review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  133. Portable devices and mobile instruments for infectious diseases point-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  134. EHR Usability: Get It Right from the Start
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  135. Human Factors Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Engage, a Consumer H...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  136. Navigation in the electronic health record: A review of the safety and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  137. Pilot evaluation of a method to assess prescribers’ information proces...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  138. ICU Rounds: “What We’ve Got Here Is Failure to Communicate”*
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  139. A Home Care Practice Scenario Using Clinical Dashboards
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  140. Usability Testing an Electronic Health Record: Lessons Learned and Eth...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  141. Integrating data from an online diabetes prevention program into an el...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  142. Interface design recommendations for computerised clinical audit and f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  143. Increasing EHR system usability through standards: Conformance criteri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  144. Toward Designing Information Display to Support Critical Care
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  145. Closing the gap
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  146. Exploring the design criteria of website interfaces for gender
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  147. Let’s Face It: Consumer-Focused Technology Is the Future of Cardiovasc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  148. How Does Learnability of Primary Care Resident Physicians Increase Aft...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

HFES members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

HFES members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text