Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online May 22, 2017

Democracy and the Settlement of International Borders, 1919 to 2001

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that territorial conflict is associated with centralized and nondemocratic regimes. We explore whether this relationship is due to the facility of democratic regimes to settle their international borders. Using Owsiak’s data set on border settlement processes, we find little evidence that democratic regimes are more likely than other types of regimes to settle their borders. In fact, joint democracy rarely precedes the first border agreement or full settlement of the border, and there is almost no qualitative evidence suggesting a link between democracy and border settlement in the rare instances of successful agreements. Democracies are also not more likely to keep their borders settled or even to be more peaceful during settled-border years. Overall, our findings suggest that border settlements lead to peace in the dyad and affirm a clear temporal sequence of border settlement, then peace and democracy for neighboring dyads.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Beardsley Kyle. 2011. The Mediation Dilemma. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Biger Gideon. 1995. The Encyclopedia of International Boundaries. New York: Facts on File.
Box-Steffensmeier Janet M., Jones Bradford S. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bremer Stuart A. 1992. “Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816–1965.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (2): 309–41.
Brochmann Marit, Hensel Paul R. 2011. “The Effectiveness of Negotiations over International River Claims.” International Studies Quarterly 55 (3): 859–82.
Bueno de Mesquita Bruce, Morrow James D., Siverson Randolph M., Smith Alastair. 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 93 (4): 791–807.
Bueno de Mesquita Bruce, Siverson Randolph M. 1995. “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability.” American Political Science Review 89 (4): 841–55.
Bueno de Mesquita Bruce, Siverson Randolph M., Woller Gary. 1992. “War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 86 (3): 638–46.
Bueno de Mesquita Bruce, Smith Alastair, Siverson Randolph M., Morrow James D. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Buhaug Halvard. 2005. “Dangerous Dyads Revisited: Democracies May Not Be That Peaceful after All.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 22 (2): 95–111.
Chan Steve. 2010. “Progress in the Democratic Peace Research Agenda.” In The International Studies Encyclopedia (ISE), edited by Denemark Robert A., 151–70. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Clare Joe. 2014. “Hawks, Doves, and International Cooperation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (7): 1311–37.
Clay Chad K., Owsiak Andrew P. 2016. “The Spatial Diffusion of International Border Agreements.” Journal of Politics 78 (2): 427–42.
Dixon William J. 1993. “Democracy and the Management of International Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (1): 42–68.
Dixon William J. 1994. “Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict.” American Political Science Review 88 (1): 14–32.
Fearon James D. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88 (3): 577–92.
Gent Stephen E., Shannon Megan. 2011. “Decision Control and the Pursuit of Binding Conflict Management: Choosing the Ties That Bind.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (2): 710–34.
Ghosn Faten. 2010. “Getting to the Table and Getting to Yes: An Analysis of International Negotiations.” International Studies Quarterly 54 (4): 1055–72.
Gibler Douglas M. 2007. “Bordering on Peace: Democracy, Territorial Issues, and Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (3): 509–32.
Gibler Douglas M. 2009. International Military Alliances, 1648–2008. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Gibler Douglas M. 2010. “Outside-in: The Effects of External Threat on State Centralization.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 54 (4): 519–42.
Gibler Douglas M. 2012. The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development, and International Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Gibler Douglas M., Braithwaite Alex. 2013. “Dangerous Neighbours, Regional Territorial Conflict, and the Democratic Peace.” British Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 877–87.
Gibler Douglas M., Hutchison Marc L., Miller Steven V. 2012. “Individual Identity Attachments and International Conflict: The Importance of Territorial Threat.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (12): 1655–83.
Gibler Douglas M., Miller Steven V. 2013. “Quick Victories? Territory, Democracies, and Their Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 57 (2): 258–84.
Gibler Douglas M., Miller Steven V. 2014. “External Territorial Threat, State Capacity, and Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research 50 (5): 634–46. doi:10.1177/0022343314531003.
Gibler Douglas M., Tir Jaroslav. 2010. “Settled Borders and Regime Type: Democratic Transitions as Consequences of Peaceful Territorial Transfers.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 951–68.
Gibler Douglas M., Tir Jaroslav. 2014. “Territorial Peace and Democratic Clustering.” The Journal of Politics 76 (1): 27–40.
Goldstein Erik. 1991. Winning the Peace: British Diplomatic Strategy, Peace Planning, and the Paris Peace Conference, 1916–1920. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hensel Paul R. 2000. “Territory: Theory and Evidence on Geography and Conflict.” In What Do We Know about War?, edited by Vasquez John A., 57–84. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hensel Paul R., Mitchell Sara McLaughlin, Sowers Thomas E., Thyne Clayton L. 2008. “Bones of Contention: Comparing Territorial, Maritime, and River Issues.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (1): 117–43.
Hutchison Marc L., Gibler Douglas M. 2007. “Political Tolerance and Territorial Threat: A Cross-national Study.” Journal of Politics 69 (1): 128–42.
Huth Paul K. 1998. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Huth Paul K., Allee Todd L. 2002. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Jones Daniel M., Bremer Stuart A., David Singer J. 1996. “Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (2): 163–213.
Kant Immanuel. 1796. Project for a Perpetual Peace: A Philosphical Essay. London, UK: Vernor and Hood.
Kocs Stephen A. 1995. “Territorial Disputes and Interstate War, 1945–1987.” Journal of Politics 57 (1): 159–75.
Leeds Brett Ashley. 1999. “Domestic Political Institutions, Credible Commitments, and International Cooperation.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 979–1002.
Mansbach R. W., Vasquez J. A. 1981. In Search of Theory: A New Paradigm for Global Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Maoz Zeev, Russett Bruce. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.” The American Political Science Review 87 (3): 624–38.
Marshall Monty G., Jaggers Keith. 2002. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–1999.” University of Maryland, Center for International Development and Conflict Management, College Park, MD.
Martin Lisa L. 2000. Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mattes Michaela. 2008. “The Effect of Changing Conditions and Agreement Provisions on Conflict and Renegotiation between States with Competing Claims.” International Studies Quarterly 52 (2): 315–34.
Mitchell Sara McLaughlin. 2002. “A Kantian System: Democracy and Third-party Conflict Resolution.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 749–59.
Mitchell Sara McLaughlin. 2012. “Norms and the Democratic Peace.” In What Do We Know about War?, edited by Vasquez John A., 167–88. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Mitchell Sara McLaughlin, Prins Brandon C. 1999. “Beyond Territorial Contiguity: Issues at Stake in Democratic Militarized Interstate Disputes.” International Studies Quarterly 43 (1): 169–83.
Morrow James D., Mesquita Bruce Bueno de, Siverson Randolph M., Smith Alastair. 2006. “Selection Institutions and War.” Economics and Governance 7 (1): 31–52.
Owsiak Andrew. 2012. “Signing Up for Peace: International Boundary Agreements, Democracy, and Militarized Interstate Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (1): 51–66.
Owsiak Andrew P. 2013. “Democratization and International Border Agreements.” The Journal of Politics 75 (3): 717–29.
Owsiak Andrew P. 2016. “Foundations for Integrating the Democratic and Territorial Peace Arguments.” Conflict Management and Peace Science. E pub ahead of print 16 June 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0738894216650635.
Owsiak Andrew P., Cuttner Allison, Buck Brent. 2016. “The International Border Agreements Dataset, 1816–2001.” Conflict Management and Peace Science.
Owsiak Andrew P., Diehl Paul F., Goertz Gary. 2016. “Border Settlement and the Movement toward and from Negative Peace.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 34 (2): 176–93.
Owsiak Andrew P., Vasquez John A. 2016. “The Cart and the Horse Redux: The Timing of Border Settlement and Joint Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science. E pub ahead of print 19 December 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000533.
Park Johann, James Patrick. 2015. “Democracy, Territory, and Armed Conflict, 1919–1995.” Foreign Policy Analysis 11 (1): 85–107.
Reiter Dan, Stam Allan C. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rider Toby J., Owsiak Andrew P. 2015. “Border Settlement, Commitment Problems, and the Causes of Contiguous Rivalry.” Journal of Peace Research 52 (4): 508–21.
Russett Bruce M., Oneal John R. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: W. W. Norton.
Schultz Kenneth A. 1999. “Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War.” International Organization 53 (2): 233–66.
Schultz Kenneth A. 2001. “Looking for Audience Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (1): 32–60.
Senese Paul D. 1997. “Between Dispute and War: The Effects of Joint Democracy on Interstate Conflict Escalation.” Journal of Politics 59 (1): 1–27.
Singer J. David, Bremer Stuart A., Stuckey John. 1972. “Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965.” In Peace, War and Numbers, edited by Russett Bruce, 19–48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Stinnett Douglas M., Tir Jaroslav, Schafer Philip, Diehl Paul F., Gochman Charles. 2002. “The Correlates of War Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 19 (2): 58–66.
Tir J., Schafer P., Diehl P. F., Goertz G. 1998. “Territorial Changes, 1816–1996: Procedures and Data.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 16 (1): 89.
Tsebelis George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Vasquez John A. 2009. The War Puzzle Revisited. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Supplementary Material

Journal of Conflict Resolution

Supplemental material files:

Summary

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

Resources

File (gibler_and_owsiak_rep_data.zip)

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: May 22, 2017
Issue published: October 2018

Keywords

  1. international conflict
  2. territorial peace
  3. democratic peace
  4. MIDs

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2017.
Request permissions for this article.
Request Permissions

Authors

Affiliations

Douglas M. Gibler
Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
Andrew P. Owsiak
Department of International Affairs, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

Notes

Douglas M. Gibler, Department of Political Science, The University of Alabama, Box 870213, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Conflict Resolution.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1413

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 8 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 8

  1. Why don’t democracies fight each other? The role of territorial issues
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Border Settlement Dynamics and Border Status Quo: A Comparative Analys...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The Limited Scope of the Democratic Peace: What We Are Missing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Democratizing the dispute: democratization and the history of conflict...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Precrisis military hostility and escalation in international crises
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Revisionist Conflict and State Repression
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Settling Resistant Territorial Disputes: The Territorial Boundary Peac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Warlike and Peaceful Societies: The Interaction of Genes and Culture
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

PSSI members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

PSSI members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text