Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online October 6, 2011

Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption

Abstract

Many people like eating meat, but most are reluctant to harm things that have minds. The current three studies show that this dissonance motivates people to deny minds to animals. Study 1 demonstrates that animals considered appropriate for human consumption are ascribed diminished mental capacities. Study 2 shows that meat eaters are motivated to deny minds to food animals when they are reminded of the link between meat and animal suffering. Finally, Study 3 provides direct support for our dissonance hypothesis, showing that expectations regarding the immediate consumption of meat increase mind denial. Moreover, this mind denial in turn reduces negative affect associated with dissonance. The findings highlight the role of dissonance reduction in facilitating the practice of meat eating and protecting cultural commitments.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Bandura A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193-209.
Bandura A., Barbaranelli C., Caprara G. V., Pastorelli C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364-374.
Bastian B., Laham S., Wilson S., Haslam N., Koval P. (2011). Blaming, praising and protecting our humanity: The implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status. British Journal of Social Psychology. 50, 469-483
Beardsworth A., Keil T. (1992). The vegetarian option: Varieties, conversions, motives and careers. Sociological Review, 40, 253-293.
Beardsworth A., Keil T. (1997). Sociology on the menu: An invitation to the study of food and society. London: Routledge.
Berndsen M., van der Pligt J. (2004). Ambivalence towards meat. Appetite, 42, 71-78.
Berndsen M., van der Pligt J. (2005). Risks of meat: The relative impact of cognitive, affective, and moral concerns. Appetite, 44, 195-205.
Bilewicz M., Imhoff R., Drogosz M. (2011). The humanity of what we eat: Conceptions of human uniqueness among vegetarians and omnivores. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 201-209.
Bratanova B., Loughnan S., Bastian B. (2011). The effect of food categorization on the perceived moral standing of animals. Appetite, 57, 193-196.
Castano E., Giner-Sorolla R. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804-818.
Cuddy A. J. C., Rock M. S., Norton M. I. (2007). Aid in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Inferences of secondary emotions and intergroup helping behavior. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 107-118.
Diener E., Emmons R. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105-1117.
Epley N., Waytz A. (2009). Mind perception. In Fiske S. T., Gilbert D. T., Lindsay G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 498-541). New York, NY: Wiley.
Epley N., Waytz A., Akalis S., Cacioppo J. T. (2008). When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26, 143-155.
Festinger L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Fiddes N. (1991). Meat: A natural symbol. London, UK: Routledge.
Foer J. S. (2009). Eating animals. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
Gray H. M., Gray K., Wegner D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619-621.
Gray K., Wegner D. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505-520.
Greene J. D., Sommerville B. R., Nystrom L. E., Darley J. M., Cohen J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108.
Haidt J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
Harmon-Jones E. (2000). Cognitive dissonance and experienced negative affect: Evidence that dissonance increases experienced negative affect even in the absence of aversive consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1490-1501.
Harmon-Jones E., Harmon-Jones C. (2002). Testing the action-based model of cognitive dissonance: The effect of action orientation on postdecisional attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 711-723.
Harmon-Jones E., Harmon-Jones C. (2007). Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, 38, 7-16.
Harmon-Jones E., Harmon-Jones C., Fearn M., Sigelman J. D., Johnson P. (2008). Left frontal cortical activation and spreading of alternatives: Tests of the action-based model of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1-15.
Harmon-Jones E., Mills J. (1999). Cognitive dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Haslam N., Kashima Y., Loughnan S., Shi J., Suitner C. (2008). Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: Contrasting humans with nonhumans in three cultures. Social Cognition, 26, 248-258.
Hoogland C., de Boer J., Boersema J. (2005). Transparency of the meat chain in the light of food culture and history. Appetite, 45, 15-23.
Kiesler C. A., Pallak M. S. (1976). Arousal properties of dissonance manipulations. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1014-1025.
Kozak M., Marsh A., Wegner D. (2006). What do I think you’re doing? Action identification and mind attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 543-555.
Kunda Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
Laham S. (2009). Expanding the moral circle: Inclusion and exclusion mindsets and the circle of moral regard. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 250-253.
Loughnan S., Haslam N., Bastian B. (2010). The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite, 55, 156-159.
Loughnan S., Haslam N., Murnane T., Vaes J., Reynolds C., Suitner C. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709-717.
Mameli M., Bortolotti L. (2006). Animal rights, animal minds, and human mindreading. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32, 84-89.
Marcu A., Lyons E., Hegarty P. (2007). Dilemmatic human-animal boundaries in Britain and Romania: Post-materialist and materialist dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 875-893.
Morewedge C. K., Preston J., Wegner D. M. (2007). Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1-11.
Newby-Clark I. R., McGregor I., Zanna M. P. (2002). Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 157-166.
Penn D. C., Povinelli D. J. (2007). Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: A comparative, critical review. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 97-118.
Plous S. (2003). Is there such a thing as prejudice towards animals? In Plous S. (Ed.), Understanding prejudice and discrimination (pp. 509-528). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Preacher K., Hayes A. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717-731.
Regan T. (1997). The rights of humans and other animals. Ethics and Behavior, 7, 103-111.
Rozin P. (1996). Towards a psychology of food and eating: From motivation to module to model to marker, morality, meaning, and metaphor. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 18-24.
Rozin P. (2004). Meat. In Katz S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of food (pp. 666-671). New York, NY: Scribner.
Rozin P., Markwith M., Stoess C. (1997). Moralization and becoming a vegetarian: The transformation of preferences into values and the recruitment of disgust. Psychological Science, 8, 67-73.
Ryder R. (1971). Experiments on animals. In Godlovitch S., Godlovitch R., Harris J. (Eds.), Animals, men and morals (pp. 41-82). New York, NY: Taplinger.
Sapontzis S. F. (1981). A critique of personhood. Ethics, 91, 607-618.
Simon L., Greenberg J., Brehm J. (1995). Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 247-260.
Singer P. (1990). Animal liberation (2nd ed.). London, UK: Jonathan Cape.
Suddendorf T., Whiten A. (2001). Mental evolution and development: Evidence for secondary representation in children, great apes and other animals. Psychological Bulletin, 5, 629-650.
Tangney J. P., Miller R. S., Flicker L., Barlow D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256-1269.
Vialles N. (1994). Animal to edible (Underwood J. A., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Waytz A., Gray K., Epley N., Wegner D. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 383-388.
Wennberg R. N. (2003). God, humans, and animals: An invitation to enlarge our moral universe. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Zanna M. P., Cooper J. (1974). Dissonance and the pill: An attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 703-709.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: October 6, 2011
Issue published: February 2012

Keywords

  1. mind attribution
  2. dementalization
  3. morality
  4. meat
  5. animals

Rights and permissions

© 2012 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 21980158

Authors

Affiliations

Brock Bastian
The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
Steve Loughnan
University of Kent, Kent, UK
Nick Haslam
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Helena R. M. Radke
The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

Notes

Brock Bastian, School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 12426

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 294 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 288

  1. Don’t mind milk? The role of animal suffering, speciesism, and guilt i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Too anthropomorphized to keep distance: The role of social psychologic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Livestock and Pets: Validation of 72 Pairs of Photographs Depicting Do...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Hard to digest investments: People oppose investment in both conventio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Why moral psychology needs personality psychology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Concern for Animals among Hunter-Gatherers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Animal welfare as a public good
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. How bad is it to eat an intelligent chicken? Children's judgments of e...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. “Has an Ugly Caw”: The Moral Implications of How Hunting Organizations...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Wenn es Menschenbilder gibt, muss es auch Tierbilder geben. Menschenbi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Brazilians' perception of shrimp sentience and welfare
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Humanizing animals does not reduce blatant dehumanization by children ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Contextual effects on attributing minds to older adults
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Characterization, typification and holistic consumer perception of wel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Exploring the role of our contacts with pets in broadening concerns fo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Thick critiques, thin solutions: news media coverage of meatpacking pl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Increased perception of the experience dimension of the animal mind re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Organs or bodies? Toward an equitable, embodied, and animal-inclusive ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Speciesist bias in AI: a reply to Arandjelović
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Feeling morally troubled about meat, dairy, egg, and fish consumption:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Too Close to Eat? Solidarity with Animals, Animal Welfare and Antibiot...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Perception of Animal Mind in the Relationship Between Morality and Vio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Teachers’ views on ‘food’ animals for sustainability education: an exp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. COVID-related environmental concerns and aspirations for a greener, pa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Differential responses to ethical vegetarian appeals: Exploring the ro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Speciesist bias in AI: how AI applications perpetuate discrimination a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Animal Welfare Certification Seal and the Effect on Brand Equity: Cons...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Service robots and artificial morality: an examination of robot behavi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Moral emotions and justifying beliefs about meat, fish, dairy and egg ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Why don't politicians talk about meat? The political psychology of hum...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. What determines omnivores’ meat consumption and their willingness to r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  32. Harnessing Moral Psychology to Reduce Meat Consumption
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Animal Welfare Science: Why and for Whom?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. The Scientific Study of Consciousness Cannot and Should Not Be Morally...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  35. Algorithms, leadership, and morality: why a mere human effect drives t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. What’s cooking? The normalization of meat in YouTube recipe videos con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Using the Frith-Happé animations to compare attributions of mental qua...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Hybrid theories, psychological plausibility, and the human/animal divi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Are the folk utilitarian about animals?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Inhuman animals: moving dehumanization into the domain of human–animal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Horsemeat consumption in France: Determinants and sustainable market p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Meat-eating justification when gender identity is threatened – The ass...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Money in a “Safe” place: Money anthropomorphism increases saving behav...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Demand changes meat as changing meat reshapes demand: The great meat r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Destination personality effects on tourists’ attitude: the role of sel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Lowering the Consumption of Animal Products without Sacrificing Consum...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Wenn es Menschenbilder gibt, muss es auch Tierbilder geben. Menschenbi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Sociological components of animal welfare
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Evaluating the effectiveness of vegetarian appeals in daily life: Comp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Changing minds about minds: Evidence that people are too sceptical abo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Norms, Identities, and Values
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Speciesism in everyday language
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. How do producers imagine consumers? Connecting farm and fork through a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Anthropomorphism and “Viralability”
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Watching Animal-Computer Interaction: Effects on Perceptions of Animal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Evidence of the unidimensional structure of mind perception
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Attitudes to animal use of named species for different purposes: effec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Perceptions of Farm Animal Sentience and Suffering: Evidence from the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Consumers’ Attitudes towards Animal Suffering: A Systematic Review on ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Predicting the moral consideration of artificial intelligences
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Understanding the future meat consumers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Why context matters when changing the diet: A narrative review of plac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. The effect of narratives on attitudes toward animal welfare and pro-so...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Is Applied Ethics Morally Problematic?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Can guided introspection help avoid rationalization of meat consumptio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. The hard-working virtual agent in the service encounter boosts custome...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Pleasure vs. identity: More eating simulation language in meat posts t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Humans first: Why people value animals less than humans
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Human-Animal Similarity and the Imageability of Mental State Concepts ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Case for Animal Spirituality—Part 2
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Nonhuman animals and the all affected interests principle
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Motivated Moral Outrage Among Meat-Eaters
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Moral Judgments in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. Educational interventions and animal consumption: Results from lab and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Frying nemo? Experimental evidence on anthropomorphism, animal ethics,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Exploring physiologic reactions to persuasive information
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. A three-dimensional motivation model of algorithm aversion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Unpalatable truths: Commitment to eating meat is associated with strat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Meating Conflict: Toward a Model of Ambivalence-Motivated Reduction of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Feral violence: The Pelorus experiment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Fleshing out the theory of planned of behavior: Meat consumption as an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. How brand self‐disclosure helps brands create intimacy with customers:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Empathic choices for animals versus humans: the role of choice context...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. The Moral Foundations of Care and Authority and the Perception of Anim...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Anthropomorphism and the Abattoir
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. Sensory perceptions and new consumer attitudes to meat
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. Meet your meat: The effect of imagined intergroup contact on wanting a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Escaping from the meat paradox: How morality and disgust affect meat-r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. Monitoring a meat-free pledge with smartphones: An experimental study
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. It/He/They/She: On Pronoun Norms for All, Human and Nonhuman
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. How conflicted are farmers about meat? livestock farmers’ attachment t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Fear leads to suffering: Fears of compassion predict restriction of th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. The robot-to-robot service encounter: an examination of the impact of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. Improving ethical attitudes to animals with digital technologies: the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  96. Children are unsuspecting meat eaters: An opportunity to address clima...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. VR outreach and meat reduction advocacy: The role of presence, empathi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  98. Attitudes towards animals and belief in animal mind among first-year v...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. The humanity inventory: Developing and validating an individual differ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  100. Lowering barriers to plant-based diets: The effect of human and non-hu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  101. Guilt of the Meat‐Eating Consumer: When Animal Anthropomorphism Leads ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  102. How children and adults value different animal lives
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  103. Humanizing Stakeholders by Rethinking Business
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  104. A cross cultural meat paradox: A qualitative study of Australia and In...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  105. Can coherence-based interventions change dogged moral beliefs about me...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  106. Animals Like Us: Leveraging the Negativity Bias in Anthropomorphism to...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  107. Considering Victims' Minds in the Evaluation of Harmful Agents' Moral ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  108. Exploring the Representation of Cows on Dairy Product Packaging in Bra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  109. Effect of Anthropomorphizing Food Animals on Intentions to Eat Meat
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  110. Speciesism, Arbitrariness and Moral Illusions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  111. The ‘me’ in meat: Does affirming the self make eating animals seem mor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  112. Toward moral pathways to motivate wildlife conservation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  113. Service encounters with virtual agents: an examination of perceived hu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  114. Beauty of the Beast: Beauty as an important dimension in the moral sta...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  115. Mind your meat: Religious differences in the social perception of anim...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  116. Changing Hearts and Plates: The Effect of Animal-Advocacy Pamphlets on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  117. The psychological speciesism of humanism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  118. Animal food products: policy, market and social issues and their influ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  119. Meat‐related cognitive dissonance: The social psychology of eating ani...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  120. Public attitudes toward dairy farm practices and technology related to...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  121. An Overview of Moral Disengagement in Consumer Studies
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  122. How proximal are pescatarians to vegetarians? An investigation of diet...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  123. Animal welfare: antispeciesism, veganism and a “life worth living”
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  124. Anthropomorphic Strategies Promote Wildlife Conservation through Empat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  125. Friend, Foe, or Food: What Influences Students’ Attitudes Toward Anima...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  126. Plant-based meat analogues: from niche to mainstream
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  127. A debunking argument against speciesism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  128. When is it wrong to eat animals? The relevance of different animal tra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  129. The Epistemology of Meat-Eating
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  130. Children Prioritize Humans Over Animals Less Than Adults Do
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  131. Beyond Meat? Taking Violence Against Non-human Animals Seriously as a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  132. A structured literature review of the meat paradox
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  133. How to Save Cultured Meat from Ecomodernism? Selective Attention and t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  134. Rabbit meat in the east of Algeria: motivation and obstacles to consum...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  135. Reducing meat consumption by appealing to animal welfare: protocol for...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  136. Rationalizing the Many Uses of Animals: Application of the 4N Justific...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  137. Liking but Devaluing Animals: Emotional and Deliberative Paths to Spec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  138. Fish Welfare – Between Regulations, Scientific Facts and Human Percept...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  139. An economic model of the meat paradox
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  140. Valuing humane lives in two-level utilitarianism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  141. A scoping review into the impact of animal imagery on pro-environmenta...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  142. Consumer Moral Dilemma in the Choice of Animal-Friendly Meat Products
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  143. Pathways from Environmental Ethics to Pro-Environmental Behaviours? In...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  144. Health, environmental, and animal rights motives for vegetarian eating
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  145. Dissociating meat from its animal origins: A systematic literature rev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  146. Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  147. Our daily meat: Justification, moral evaluation and willingness to sub...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  148. Man's best friends: attitudes towards the use of different kinds of an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  149. Belief in Pigs’ Capacity to Suffer: An Assessment of Pig Farmers, Vete...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  150. A novel way of responding to dissonance evoked by belief disconfirmati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  151. Mental State Attribution to Nonhuman Primates and Other Animals by Rur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  152. Views on the Moral Status of Animals
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  153. Risiko Gülle – ein Abfallprodukt gefährdet das Globale Produktionsnetz...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  154. Sensory Connections and Emotional Knowledge
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  155. Existential uncertainty and religion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  156. How anthropomorphism is changing the social context of modern wildlife...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  157. Promiscuous condemnation: People assume ambiguous actions are immoral
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  158. Animal Welfare for Corporate Sustainability: The Business Benchmark on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  159. The Meat Paradox, Omnivore’s Akrasia, and Animal Ethics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  160. Dominion, Stewardship and Reconciliation in the Accounts of Ordinary P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  161. We Can’t Keep Meating Like This: Attitudes towards Vegetarian and Vega...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  162. Compartmentalization of Animals: Toward an Understanding of How We Cre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  163. The what, how, and why of moralization: A review of current definition...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  164. Meat on the menu? How the menu structure can stimulate vegetarian choi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  165. The Knowledge of Animals as Food Scale
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  166. Values and cognitive mechanisms: Comparing the predictive factors of A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  167. The impact of imagined contact in the realm of human-animal relations:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  168. The Recognition of Animal Sentience by the Law
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  169. Stopping wolves in the wild and legitimizing meat consumption: Effects...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  170. Political conservatism and the exploitation of nonhuman animals: An ap...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  171. Stereotypes, emotions, and behaviors associated with animals: A causal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  172. Rethinking human-animal relations: The critical role of social psychol...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  173. How Normal Meat Becomes Stranger as Cultured Meat Becomes More Normal;...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  174. L’éléphant dans la pièce. Pour une approche économique de l’alimentati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  175. Animal Images Database: Validation of 120 Images for Human-Animal Stud...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  176. Speciesism Predicts Prejudice Against Low-Status and Hierarchy-Attenua...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  177. We Are Family: Viewing Pets as Family Members Improves Wellbeing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  178. Toward a New Framework for Understanding Human–Wild Animal Relations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  179. “Animals are friends, not food”: Anthropomorphism leads to less favora...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  180. Psychological processes and influences on vegetarianism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  181. Why some choose the vegetarian option: Are all ethical motivations the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  182. Dealing with the meat paradox: Threat leads to moral disengagement fro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  183. Maintaining Meat: Cultural Repertoires and the Meat Paradox in a Diver...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  184. From cognitive dissonance to cognitive Polyphasia: A sociocultural app...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  185. A comparison study of meat eaters and non-meat eaters on mind attribut...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  186. “But I Don’t Eat that Much Meat”
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  187. “If I became a vegan, my family and friends would hate me:” Anticipati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  188. Farm Animal Cognition—Linking Behavior, Welfare and Ethics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  189. A multidimensional measure of animal ethics orientation – Developed an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  190. From cash to crickets: The non-monetary value of a resource can promot...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  191. Understanding the multiple conceptions of animal welfare
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  192. How happy is your pet? The problem of subjectivity in the assessment o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  193. Longitudinal effects of human supremacy beliefs and vegetarianism thre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  194. Putting Meat on the (Classroom) Table: Problems of Denial and Communic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  195. In Vitro Meat
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  196. In Vitro Meat
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  197. Carnism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  198. Cognitive Dissonance in Food and Nutrition
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  199. Vegetarians’ and omnivores’ affective and physiological responses to i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  200. Changing Ethically Troublesome Behavior: The Causes, Consequences, and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  201. Consumer behaviour related to rabbit meat as functional food
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  202. People are averse to machines making moral decisions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  203. Religiosity and Support for Killing Animals: Evidence of a Curvilinear...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  204. Testing a novel multicomponent intervention to reduce meat consumption...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  205. Dietary Motivations and Challenges among Animal Rights Advocates in Sp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  206. Measuring the meat paradox: How ambivalence towards meat influences mo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  207. The influence of psychological traits, beliefs and taste responsivenes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  208. Familiarity and Interest in Working with Livestock Decreases the Odds ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  209. Too humanlike to increase my appetite: Disposition to anthropomorphize...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  210. Problematizing the Ethical "Taste" of Authenticity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  211. A semiotic analysis on cultural meanings of eating horsemeat
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  212. ANIMAL-DERIVED FOOD INDUSTRY: RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES DUE TO FARM ANIM...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  213. The developmental origins of moral concern: An examination of moral bo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  214. Are Baby Animals Less Appetizing? Tenderness toward Baby Animals and A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  215. The intergroup foundations of climate change justice
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  216. Human Rights and Sports Mega-Events: The Role of Moral Disengagement i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  217. Toward a Psychology of Moral Expansiveness
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  218. The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefinin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  219. Cultured Meat
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  220. The effects of dissociation on willingness to eat meat are moderated b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  221. Testing and Extending the Pets as Ambassadors Hypothesis: The Role of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  222. Resolving the Meat-Paradox: A Motivational Account of Morally Troubles...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  223. Cognitive dissonance in food and nutrition–A review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  224. Reducing meat consumption in developed and transition countries to cou...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  225. The Carnism Inventory: Measuring the ideology of eating animals
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  226. Warum wir Tiere essen (obwohl wir sie mögen)
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  227. The love of money results in objectification
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  228. Invited review: Socio-cognitive capacities of goats and their impact o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  229. Theory of Animal Mind: Human Nature or Experimental Artefact?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  230. American and German attitudes towards cow-calf separation on dairy far...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  231. Normalised, human-centric discourses of meat and animals in climate ch...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  232. Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the Uni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  233. Animal Killing and Postdomestic Meat Production
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  234. Sensory Perceptions and New Consumer Attitudes to Meat
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  235. Bibliography
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  236. Perspective Taking Failures in the Valuation of Physical and Mental St...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  237. A Speaking Piglet Advertises Beef: An Ethical Analysis on Objectificat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  238. Moral Intuition or Moral Disengagement? Cognitive Science Weighs in on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  239. Consumer acceptance of insect-based foods in the Netherlands: Academic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  240. Coping with unpleasant knowledge: Meat eating among students of enviro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  241. When Meat Gets Personal, Animals’ Minds Matter Less...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  242. What We Know about the Public’s Level of Concern for Farm Animal Welfa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  243. Public Perceptions of Mental Capacities of Nonhuman Animals
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  244. Facing the edible. The effects of edibility information on the neural ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  245. Meat eaters by dissociation: How we present, prepare and talk about me...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  246. When indifference is ambivalence: Strategic ignorance about meat consu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  247. Végétarisme, végétalisme, véganisme : aspects motivationnels et psycho...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  248. Affective Beliefs Influence the Experience of Eating Meat
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  249. Towards an integrated approach to food behaviour: Meat consumption and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  250. People and Companion Animals: It Takes Two to Tango
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  251. Not appropriate dinner table conversation? Talking to children about m...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  252. Warmth and competence in animals
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  253. Situating moral disengagement: Motivated reasoning in meat consumption...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  254. Social Dominance and Legitimizing Myths about Animal Use
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  255. Animal Ethics Profiling of Vegetarians, Vegans and Meat-Eaters
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  256. No Meat, Less Meat, or Better Meat: Understanding NGO Messaging Choice...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  257. Embodying Approach Motivation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  258. Confronting the meat paradox in different cultural contexts: Reactions...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  259. Perceiving the agency of harmful agents: A test of dehumanization vers...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  260. Experimental Approaches to Moral Standing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  261. Seeing Cooperation or Competition: Ecological Interactions in Cultural...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  262. Foetus or child? Abortion discourse and attributions of humanness
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  263. Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  264. Meat, beyond the plate. Data-driven hypotheses for understanding consu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  265. The Moralization of Eating Behavior. Gendered Cognitive and Behavioral...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  266. Underlying differences between conscientious omnivores and vegetarians...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  267. Raising the Bar in the Justification of Animal Research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  268. Can you have your meat and eat it too? Conscientious omnivores, vegeta...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  269. Carnivorous Cats, Vegetarian Dogs, and the Resolution of the Vegetaria...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  270. Moral Disengagement in Harmful but Cherished Food Practices? An Explor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  271. Childhood pet ownership, attachment to pets, and subsequent meat avoid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  272. Efforts to overcome vegetarian-induced dissonance among meat eaters
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  273. From Sacrifice to the Slaughterhouse
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  274. The Psychology of Eating Animals
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  275. Cruel nature: Harmfulness as an important, overlooked dimension in jud...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  276. Deliberating on Social Targets' Goal Instrumentality Leads to Dehumani...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  277. Can We Say What Diet Is Best for Health?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  278. Dehumanization and Infrahumanization
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  279. A comparison of attitudes toward meat and animals among strict and sem...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  280. Compassion and contamination. Cultural differences in vegetarianism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  281. Lost in the crowd: Entitative group membership reduces mind attributio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  282. A meaty matter. Pet diet and the vegetarian’s dilemma
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  283. Wholesome Foods and Wholesome Morals?...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  284. Carnism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  285. The Psychology of Humanness
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  286. Seeing Agents When we Need to, Attributing Experience When we Feel Lik...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  287. Too close to home. Factors predicting meat avoidance
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  288. Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

SPSP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

SPSP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text