Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online September 17, 2014

Can You Tell That I’m in a Relationship? Attachment and Relationship Visibility on Facebook

Abstract

People often attempt to shape others’ perceptions of them, but the role of romantic relationships in this process is unknown. The present set of studies investigates relationship visibility, the centrality of relationships in the self-images that people convey to others. We propose that attachment underlies relationship visibility and test this hypothesis across three studies in the context of Facebook. Avoidant individuals showed low desire for relationship visibility, whereas anxious individuals reported high desired visibility (Studies 1 and 2); however, similar motives drove both groups’ actual relationship visibility (Study 1). Moreover, both avoidant individuals and their partners were less likely to make their relationships visible (Studies 1 and 3). On a daily basis, when people felt more insecure about their partner’s feelings, they tended to make their relationships visible (Study 3). These studies highlight the role of relationships in how people portray themselves to others.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Aron A., Aron E. N., Tudor M., Nelson G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.
Back M. D., Stopfer J. M., Vazire S., Gaddis S., Schmukle S. C., Egloff B., Gosling S. D. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21, 372-374.
Bartholomew K., Horowitz L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
Bartz J. A., Lydon J. E. (2004). Close relationships and the working self-concept: Implicit and explicit effects of priming attachment on agency and communion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1389-1401.
Baumeister R. F., Jones E. E. (1978). When self-presentation is constrained by the target’s knowledge: Consistency and compensation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 608-618.
Baxter L. A., Widenmann S. (1993). Revealing and not revealing the status of romantic relationships to social networks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 321-337.
Bogaert A. F., Hafer C. L. (2009). Predicting the timing of coming out in gay and bisexual men from world beliefs, physical attractiveness, and childhood gender identity/role. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 1991-2019.
Buhrmester M., Kwang T., Gosling S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
Butzer B., Campbell L. (2008). Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples. Personal Relationships, 15, 141-154.
Campbell J. D., Trapnell P. D., Heine S. J., Katz I. M., Lavallee L. F., Lehman D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 141-156.
Campbell L., Simpson J. A. (2013). The blossoming of relationship science. In Simpson J. A., Campbell L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 3-12). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Campbell L., Simpson J. A., Kashy D. A., Rholes W. S. (2001). Attachment orientations, dependence, and behavior in a stressful situation: An application of the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 821-843.
Carpenter C. J., Spottswood E. L. (2013). Exploring romantic relationships on social networking sites using the self-expansion model. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1531-1537.
Collins N. L., Allard L. M. (2001). Cognitive representations of attachment: The content and function of working models. In Fletcher G. O., Clark M. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 60-85). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Collins N. L., Read S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644-663.
Emery L. F., Muise A., Alpert E., Le B. (in press). Do we look happy? Perceptions of romantic relationship quality on Facebook. Personal Relationships.
Etcheverry P. E., Le B., Wu T.-S., Wei M. (2013). Attachment and the investment model: Predictors of relationship commitment, maintenance, and persistence. Personal Relationships, 20, 546-567.
Facebook Newsroom. (2014). Company info. Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info
Foster C. A., Campbell W. K. (2005). The adversity of secret relationships. Personal Relationships, 12, 125-143.
Fraley R. C., Shaver P. R. (1998). Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1198-1212.
Goodman J. K., Cryder C. E., Cheema A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213-224.
Gosling S. D., Rentfrow P. J., Swann W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality dimensions. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
Hazan C., Shaver P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
House W. C. (1980). Effects of knowledge that attributions will be observed by others. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 528-545.
Karl K. A., Hall L. M., Peluchette J. V. (2013). City employee perceptions of the impact of dress and appearance: You are what you wear. Public Personnel Management, 42, 452-470.
Kenny D. A., Kashy D. A., Cook W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Kirkpatrick L. A., Davis K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 502-512.
Leary M. R., Kowalski R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47.
Lehmiller J. J. (2012). Perceived marginalization and its association with physical and psychological health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 451-469.
Lemay E. P., Dudley K. L. (2011). Caution: Fragile! Regulating the interpersonal security of chronically insecure partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 681-702.
Leslie L. A., Huston T. L., Johnson M. P. (1986). Parental reactions to dating relationships: Do they make a difference? Journal of Marriage and Family, 48, 57-66.
Loving T. J., Agnew C. R. (2001). Socially desirable responding in close relationships: A dual-component approach and measure. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 551-574.
Marshall T. C., Bejanyan K., Di Castro G., Lee R. A. (2013). Attachment styles as predictors of Facebook-related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 20, 1-22.
Mashek D. J., Sherman M. (2004). Desiring less closeness with intimate others. In Mashek D. J., Aron A. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 343-356). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mikulincer M. (1995). Attachment style and the mental representation of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1203-1215.
Muise A., Christofides E., Desmarais S. (2014). “Creeping” or just information seeking? Gender differences in partner monitoring in response to jealousy on Facebook. Personal Relationships, 21, 35-50.
Nadkarni A., Hofmann S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 243-249.
Oppenheimer D. M., Meyvis T., Davidenko N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872.
Papp L. M., Danielewicz J., Cayemberg C. (2012). “Are we Facebook official?” Implications of dating partners’ Facebook use and profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 85-90.
Preacher K. J., Hayes A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S., Cheong Y. F., Congdon R. T. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Rosenberg M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Saslow L. R., Muise A., Impett E. A., Dubin M. (2013). Can you see how happy we are? Facebook images and relationship satisfaction. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4, 411-418.
Simpson J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 971-980.
Simpson J. A., Rholes W. S., Nelligan J. S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 434-446.
Slotter E. B., Gardner W. L. (2012). How needing you changes me: The influence of attachment anxiety on self-concept malleability in romantic relationships. Self and Identity, 11, 386-408.
Snyder M., Gangestad S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 125-139.
Wegner D. M., Lane J. D., Dimitri S. (1994). The allure of secret relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 287-300.
Wei M., Russell D. W., Mallinckrodt B., Vogel D. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)–Short Form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187-204.
Wilson R. E., Gosling S. D., Graham L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 203-220.

Supplementary Material

Online Appendix

Files in this Data Supplement:

Summary

The online supplemental material is available at http://pspb.sagepub.com/supplemental.

Resources

File (10.1177_0146167214549944_onlineappendix.pdf)

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: September 17, 2014
Issue published: November 2014

Keywords

  1. attachment
  2. close relationships
  3. impression management
  4. Facebook

Rights and permissions

© 2014 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
Request permissions for this article.
Request Permissions
PubMed: 25231798

Authors

Affiliations

Lydia F. Emery
Haverford College, Haverford, PA, USA
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Amy Muise
University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Emily L. Dix
Haverford College, Haverford, PA, USA
University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
Benjamin Le
Haverford College, Haverford, PA, USA

Notes

Lydia F. Emery, Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Swift Hall 409, 2029 N. Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 5621

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 42 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 40

  1. Pursuing Safety in Social Connection: A Flexibly Fluid Perspective on ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Dealing with uncertain situations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Does Facebook ‘threaten’ romantic relationships? Online surveillance a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. User-Defined Relationships: Exploring the Dynamics of Attachment Style...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Romantik İlişkilerinde Sosyal Ağ Sitelerinin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. From #RelationshipGoals to #Heartbreak – We use Instagram differently ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Online Social Networking and Romantic Relationships
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Online construction of romantic relationships on social media
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Attachment style and social media fatigue: The role of usage-related s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Social networking site use and relationship quality: A double edged sw...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Forming digital identities in social networks: the role of privacy con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Attachment Style and Jealousy in the Digital Age: Do Attitudes About O...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. The use of Facebook in romantic relationships: An actor-partner interd...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Changing facebook profile pictures to dyadic photos: Positive associat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Modulation of Instagram Number of Followings by Avoidance in Close Rel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. #Couplegoals: Self-Esteem, Relationship Outcomes, and the Visibility o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Are online behaviors damaging our in-person connections? Passive versu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Commitment strength versus commitment bolstering: Uncertainty undermin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Compliance and resistance: An investigation into the construction of g...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Communicating Commitment: A Relationship-Protection Account of Dyadic ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  21. An examination of relational maintenance and dissolution through socia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Shaping Digital Identities in Social Networks: Data Elements and the R...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Social Networks and Relationship Maintenance
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Online Social Networking and Romantic Relationships
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. The Big 5 and relationship maintenance on Facebook
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Adult attachment and self-disclosure on social networking site: A cont...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Portrayals of Romantic Deception to the Masses: An Analysis of Classic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. An exploration of the link between adult attachment and problematic Fa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Pregnant Women Sharing Pregnancy-Related Information on Facebook: Web-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Adult attachment and profile images on Chinese social networking sites...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. “It's complicated.” A systematic review of associations between social...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Is love related to selfies? Romantic selfie posting behavior and love ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Self-Concept Clarity and Romantic Relationships
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Individual differences in attachment are associated with usage and per...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Exploring the role of social networking sites within adolescent romant...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. The Big Five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. I’m still socially anxious online: Offline relationship impairment cha...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Comparing You = Comparing Me: Social Comparisons of the Expanded Self
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  39. The Use of Social Networking Sites for Relationship Maintenance in Lon...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Do we look happy? Perceptions of romantic relationship quality on Face...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

SPSP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

SPSP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text