Group status, perceptions of agency, and the correspondence bias: Attributional processes in the formation of stereotypes about high and low status groups
Abstract
The Stereotype Content Model proposes that competence (or alternatively, agency) is a fundamental dimension of stereotypes. According to this model, beliefs about agency are partially due to the status relations between groups, such that high status groups are perceived to possess agency, whereas low status groups are perceived to lack agentic characteristics. Despite the considerable support for this model, the psychological processes that produce these stereotypes have not been fully explored. In the current studies, we examined whether the correspondence bias may be partially responsible for the stereotype that members of low status groups lack agentic characteristics, relative to those who belong to high status groups. Across both studies, a measure of the correspondence bias predicted such stereotypical beliefs, even after accounting for variables that are known to be associated with beliefs about high and low status groups. This effect was observed when beliefs about the status of groups were experimentally manipulated, and when we measured stereotypical beliefs about two sets of actual high and low status groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Abele A., Cuddy A. J. C., Judd C., Yzerbyt V. (2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063–1065.
Block J., Funder D. C. (1986). Social roles and social perception: Individual differences in attribution and “error.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1200–1207.
Campbell D., Carr S., MacLachlan M. (2001). Attributing “third world poverty” in Australia and Malawi. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 409–430.
Caprariello P. A., Cuddy A. J. C., Fiske S. T. (2009). Social structure shapes cultural stereotypes and emotions: A causal test of the stereotype content model. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 147–155.
Conway M., Pizzamiglio M. T., Mount L. (1996). Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25–38.
Cozzarelli C., Wilkinson A. V., Tagler M. J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 207–227.
Cuddy A. J. C., Fiske S. T., Glick P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. In Zanna M. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61–149). New York: Academic Press.
Cuddy A. J. C., Fiske S. T., Kwan V. S. Y., Glick P., Demoulin S., Leyens J. P,. . .Ziegler R. (2009). Stereotype Content Model across cultures: Universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1–33.
Fiske S. T., Cuddy A. J. C., Glick P., Xu J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.
Gawronski B. (2003). On difficult questions and evident answers: Dispositional inference from role-constrained behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1459–1475.
Gilbert D. T., Malone P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.
Harper D., Wagstaff G., Newton J., Harrison K. (1990). Lay causal perceptions of third world poverty and the just world theory. Social Behavior and Personality, 18, 235–238.
Heilman M. E., Haynes M. C. (2005). No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women’s success in male/female teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 905–916.
Jones J. M. (2006). From racial inequality to social justice: The legacy of Brown v. Board and lessons from South Africa. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 885–909.
Jost J. T., Burgess D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.
Lemieux A. F., Pratto F. (2003). Poverty and prejudice. In Carr S., Sloan T. (Eds.), Poverty and psychology: From global perspective to local practice (pp. 147–162). New York: Springer.
Lerner M. J., Miller D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and looking ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1031–1051.
Lipkus I. M., Dalbert C., Siegler I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–677.
Krull D. S., Loy M., H., Lin J., Wang C., Chen S., Zhao X. (1999). The fundamental fundamental attribution error: Correspondence bias in individualist and collectivist cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1208–1219.
Meng X, Rosenthal R., Rubin D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172–175.
Oldmeadow J., Fiske S. T. (2007). System-justifying ideologies moderate status – competence stereotypes: Roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1135–1148.
Pettigrew T. F. (1979) The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 55, 461–476.
Pratto F., Sidanius J., Stallworth L.M., Malle B.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
Pratto F., Sidanius J., Levin S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. In Stroebe W., Hewstone M. (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320.
Ross L., Amabile T. M., Steinmetz J. L. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perceptions processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485–494.
Russell A. M., Fiske S. T. (2008). It’s all relative: Social position and interpersonal perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1193–120.
Stalder D. R. (2009). Competing roles for the subfactors of need for closure in committing the fundamental attribution error. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 701–705.
Yzerbyt V. Y., Rogier A., Fiske S. (1998). Group entitativity and social attribution: On translating situational constraints into stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1090–1104.
Zucker G. S., Weiner B. (1993). Conservatism and perception of poverty: An attributional analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 925–943.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: December 5, 2012
Issue published: July 2013
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 939
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 13 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 12
-
Construction and Validation of a Scale to Assess Social Judgments Towa...
-
E-coaching systems and social justice: ethical concerns about inequali...
-
The role of legitimizing the social hierarchy in the impact of status ...
-
Who is expected to make contact? Interpretative repertoires related to...
-
Intersectional Stereotyping in Media Coverage: The Case of Stacey Abra...
-
Gender diversity and the spillover effects of women on boards
-
Typical Roles and Intergroup Relations Shape Stereotypes: How Understa...
-
The relationship between social status and the components of agency
-
Using the Semantic Differential Technique to Assess Stereotypes toward...
-
Methodological Errors in Attitude Attribution Paradigm and Their Possi...
-
Slut-shaming on Facebook: Do Social Class or Clothing Affect Perceived...
-
Spillover Effects of Women on Boards
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
