Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online August 30, 2012

The Wire and repair of the journalistic paradigm

Abstract

The last season of The Wire drew particular attention from journalists given its setting at a fictional version of the Baltimore Sun, where show creator David Simon once worked. The concept of paradigm repair was used here to explain journalists’ responses to The Wire. Our qualitative analysis of articles from 44 newspapers, as well as radio transcripts, dealing with the 2008 season shows that a fictional challenge can precipitate vigorous efforts by journalists to restore their reputation after what they regard as an attack on their professional identity and credibility. The [real] Baltimore Sun and other papers where Simon’s journalistic nemeses worked were the most likely to call Simon vindictive and obsessed and to use this to marginalize his stinging critique of corporatized newsrooms.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Barnhart A (2008) David Simon on journalists, the fake journalist, and those dirty downloaders. Kansas City Star, 7 March. Available at: http://blogs.kansascity.com/tvbarn/2008/03/david-simon-to.html
Berger G (2008) A paradigm in process: What the scapegoating of Vusi Mona signalled about South African journalism. Communicatio 34(1): 1–20.
Berkowitz D (2000) Doing double duty: Paradigm repair and the Princess Diana what-a-story. Journalism 1(2): 125–141.
Berkowitz D, Eko L (2007) Blasphemy as sacred rite/right: ‘The Mohammed cartoons affair’ and maintenance of journalistic ideology. Journalism Studies 8: 779–797.
Bianco R (2008) The Wire: Grounded in genius. USA Today, 4 January, p. 14D.
Bishop R (2000) Good afternoon, good evening, and good night: ‘The Truman Show’ as media criticism. Journal of Communication Inquiry 24: 6–18.
Buckman A (2008) Bye Bye, Baltimore. New York Post, 4 January. Available at: http://www.nypost.com/f/print/entertainment/tv/item_8F3SML8tbJhmxLO5CDeCLP
Caramanica J (2008) Dissecting threads of decay. Los Angeles Times, 4 January, p. 34.
Cecil M (2002) Bad apples: Paradigm overhaul and the CNN/TIME ‘tailwind’ story. Journal of Communication Inquiry 26(1): 46–58.
Chalkley T (2000) Throwing stones. Baltimore City Paper, 4 October. Available at: http://www.citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=10193
Dechter G (2006) Sincere flattery. Baltimore City Paper, 4 January. Available at: http://www.citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=11319
Deggans E (2008) ‘Wire’ buzzes until the end. St. Petersburg Times, 8 March, p. E1.
Ehrlich MC (2005) Shattered Glass, movies, and the free press myth. Journal of Communication Inquiry 29(2): 103–118.
Ehrlich MC (2006) Facts, truth and bad journalists in the movies. Journalism 7(4): 501–519.
Elfman D (2008) ‘The Wire’ lifts the shirt of a city’s underbelly. Chicago Sun-Times, 6 January, p. D7.
Fairbanks AM (2010) Deconstructing ‘The Wire’. The New York Times, 3 January. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/education/03wire-t.html?pagewanted=print (accessed 20 April 10).
Finnerty A (2008) Wired for authenticity. The Wall Street Journal, 4 January, p. W2.
Folkenflik D (2007) The Wire to focus on Baltimore newspaper. NPR, 28 December, Morning edition.
Folkenflik D (2008) Baltimore paper gets a turn on The Wire. NPR, 4 January, The Bryant Park Project (interviewer – Mike Pesca).
Gilbert M (2008) Why you should tap into ‘The Wire’ before the series taps out in its final season. The Boston Globe, 6 January, p. N1.
Gold M (2008) Right down to the ‘The Wire’. Los Angeles Times, 6 January, p. E1, 28, 29.
Goodman T (2008a) For ‘The Wire’ it’s the end of the line. San Francisco Chronicle, 4 January, p. E1.
Goodman T (2008b) ‘The Wire’. San Francisco Chronicle, 26 March. Available at: ProQuest, SFC0000020080325e43q000p5 (accessed May 2010).
Gray E (2008) HBO’s ‘Wire’ surges into dramatic finish tonight. Philadelphia Daily News, 9 March. Available at: ProQuest, MRNS000020090424e439008wm (accessed May 2010).
Terry G (2008) Interview with David Bianculli, 3 January. Fresh Air. National Public Radio.
Hiltbrand D (2008) Nothing neat at end of ‘The Wire’. Philadelphia Inquirer, 10 March, p. B9.
Hindman EB (2005) Jayson Blair, The New York Times, and paradigm repair. Journal of Communication 55(2): 225–241.
Howell D (2008) A farewell hope for The Post’s future. The Washington Post, 28 December. Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/26/AR2008122601144.html?referrer=emailarticle
Kelly LW (2009) Casting ‘The Wire’: Complicating notions of performance, authenticity, and ‘otherness’. Darkmatter. Available at: http://www.darkmatter101.org/site/2009/05/29/casting-the-wire-complicating-notions-of-performance-authenticity-and-otherness/print/
Kilduff M (2008) The Wire winds down. San Francisco Chronicle, 17 March, p. B4.
Kronke D (2008) Down to ‘The Wire’. Los Angeles Daily News, 6 January. ProQuest, Document LAD0000020080223e4160000i
Kuhn T (1970[1962]) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kushman R (2008) ‘The Wire’ begins final season – and it’s as great as ever. The Sacramento Bee, 4 January, p. K1.
Lowry B (2008) No hometown love for Baltimore Sun. Variety, 14–20 January, p. 5.
McCabe B (2008) David Simon: ‘The Wire’ exit interview. Baltimore City Paper, 12 March. Available at: http://www.citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=15437
Martin P (2008) Critical mass TV comes of age. The Arkansas Democrat, 25 March. ProQuest AKDG000020080325e43p00012
Montgomery D (2008) Baltimore Sun’s ‘Wire’ portrayal fuels a hot debate. The Washington Post, 16 January, pp. C1–2.
Moses L (2000) Increasingly, newspapers call upon ombudsmen to cure what ails them. ONO: Organization of News Ombudsmen, 23 November. Available at: http://newsombudsmen.org/articles/articles-about-ombudsmen/increasingly-newspapers-call-on-ombudsmen-to-cure-what-ails-them
Passman M (2008) A five-year course in urban decay. Michigan Daily, 18 March. ProQuest UWIR000020080318e43i0005s
Pearson J (2009) David Simon. Vice 15(2): 152–162.
Peterson K (2008) ‘Wire’ still highly charged as series winds down. The San Diego Union-Tribune, 4 January, p. E1.
Pogrebin A (2000) Favorite son. Brill’s Content October: 104–107, 142–144.
Rashbaum WK (2005) Police say a Queens drug ring watched too much television. The New York Times, 15 January. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/15/nyregion/15drug.html
Rea S (2008) The justly acclaimed HBO series returns tonight for its final gritty season of looking unblinkingly at urban life. Philadelphia Inquirer, 6 January, p. H1.
Reese SD (1990) The news paradigm and the ideology of objectivity: A socialist at the Wall Street Journal. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7: 390–409.
Rotstein G (2008) Hard times in journalism trenches (but some hacks deserve it). Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 3 March, p. 2.
Ryan M (2008a) ‘Wire’ man wants you to care. Chicago Tribune, 13 January, p. 10.
Ryan M (2008b) Gripping ‘Wire’ comes to the end of the line. Chicago Tribune, 19 March, pp. 6, 7.
Sabin R (2011) The Wire. Journalism Studies 12: 139–155.
Salwen MB (2001) Evelyn Waugh’s Scoop: The facts behind the fiction. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 78(1): 150–171.
Scocca T (2008) Whose bastard Sun: If ‘The Wire’ is wrong, why is Baltimore’s paper so bad? New York Observer, 29 January. Available at: http://www.observer.com/2008/sun-set-over-baltimore-wire-gets-it-right-where-tribune-didnt
Shales T (2008) ‘The Wire’: Crackling with heat. The Washington Post, 6 January, p. M01.
Simon D (2006) Michael Olesker is a plagiarist? Who isn’t? Baltimore City Paper, 18 January. Available at: http://www.citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=11362
Simon D (2008) Does the news matter to anyone anymore? The Washington Post, 20 January, p. B01.
Steiner L (2009) The excommunication of Don Imus. Journal of Media and Religion 8: 191–208.
Tenenboim-Weinblatt K (2009) Jester, fake journalist, or the new Walter Lippman? Recognition processes of Jon Stewart by the US journalistic community. International Journal of Communication 3: 416–439.
Thomas R (2008) ‘The Wire’ is the best thing on TV right now. The Capital Times & Wisconsin State Journal, 15 January, p. B1.
To the Point (2008) ‘The Wire’ runs out [Editorial]. The Baltimore Sun, 11 March.
Tuck A (2008) Checks, balances keep reporters’ coverage accurate. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 8 March, p. A17.
Vozzella L (2008) Fake newsroom, real anger. The Baltimore Sun, 6 January, Local section, p. 2.
Wagner C (2008) Down to the Wire. The Chicago Tribune, 5 January, p. 14.
Wall MA, Bicket D (2008) The ‘Baghdad Broadcasting Corporation’: US conservatives take aim at the British news media. Journalism 9(2): 123–140.
Wiltz T (2008) ‘The Wire,’ so real you could feel it. The Washington Post, 11 March, p. C01.
Zurawik D (2006) Simon denies role based on editor. The Baltimore Sun, 6 July, Today Section, p. 2.
Zurawik D (2007) ‘The Wire’ loses spark in newsroom storyline. The Baltimore Sun, 30 December. McClatchy-Tribune Regional News.
Zurawik D (2008) ‘The Wire’ finale is a cop-out for a once great show. The Baltimore Sun, 9 March.
Zelizer B (2004) Taking Journalism Seriously: News and the Academy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Biographies

Linda Steiner is Professor at the University of Maryland; her most recent book is the co-edited Key Concepts in Critical Cultural Studies (University of Illinois Press, 2010).
Jing Guo is a PhD student in the College of Journalism at University of Maryland, College Park; she studies emotional/affective responses to online news.’
Raymond McCaffrey is a PhD student at the University of Maryland’s College of Journalism. His experience includes eight years at The Washington Post.
Paul Hills is a journalist, film-maker, and lecturer in the School of Journalism and Media Studies at Rhodes University, in South Africa.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Pages: 703 - 720
Article first published online: August 30, 2012
Issue published: August 2013

Keywords

  1. David Simon
  2. journalism criticism
  3. paradigm repair
  4. professionalism
  5. The Wire

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2012.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Linda Steiner
University of Maryland, USA
Jing Guo
University of Maryland, USA
Raymond McCaffrey
University of Maryland, USA
Paul Hills
Rhodes University, South Africa

Notes

Linda Steiner, College of Journalism, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journalism.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 508

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 19 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 15

  1. ‘Fast-paced,' ‘snakey' and ‘commercial': How American student audience...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Guarding the Firewall: How Political Journalists Distance Themselves F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. What is Sports Journalism? How COVID-19 Accelerated a Redefining of U....
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. How Fiction Makes Amends for Journalism: The Case of When They See Us
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. When Institutions Fail: Communitarianism and Spotlight
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Who Thinks that Female Journalists Have Sex with their Sources? Testin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Lügenpresse: The lying press and German journalists’ responses to a st...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Journalism, not ‘cheerleading’: An ombudsman’s paradigm repair in the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Paradigm Repair
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Social media and a case of mistaken identity: A newspaper’s response t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. One Country, Two Journalistic Cultures: The Charlie Hebdo Affair in th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. The GamerGate controversy and journalistic paradigm maintenance
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. To republish or not to republish: The “Je Suis Charlie” Mohammed carto...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Dueling Scandals: Rolling Stone , Brian Wi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. All in the Game
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text