‘Great Recession': A Brief Etymology

The “Great Recession” has taken hold.

As a term, that is.

The title “Great Recession” seems to be gaining some currency. After months of floundering over what pithy moniker to call this mess we’re in, a number of analysts, economists, historians, reporters, columnists, critics and even International Monetary Fund officials have begun using the term, often with a qualifier like, “what some are calling ‘The Great Recession.'”

Clark Hoyt, the Times’s public editor, asked me on Tuesday who had coined the phrase, and when. I wasn’t sure, so I did some archive searches.

Brian Stelter, a colleague who covers the media, wrote back in December that “In the last week, ‘Great Recession’ has become a popular phrase.” Here’s a quick, highly unscientific Nexis archive search on articles containing the term “Great Recession”:

INSERT DESCRIPTION Source: Nexis archives. Some big caveats: Though I tried to weed them out, these numbers do contain some duplicate stories (e.g., content that was syndicated); in some cases the term “Great Recession” may not have been capitalized and/or may have had an indefinite article preceding it (i.e., in a phrase like “this could be the beginning of a great recession“); and given the plethora of blogs, podcasts, etc., that don’t make it into the Nexis archives, these sources are by no means comprehensive.

The chart does give you the general sense that the term really caught on in December, after months of more sporadic use. Most usages of “Great Recession” that occurred before autumn were made in a predictive sense. In April, Portfolio’s Jesse Eisinger, for example, predicted that “The next president will take office during what may well come to be known as the Great Recession.”

But here’s the thing: Nobody can take credit for coining the term “The Great Recession” during the last year. Why? Because the “Great Recession of 2008″ is not the first recession to be slapped with the lofty title. Every recession of the last several decades has, at some point or another, received this special designation:

  • Some economists believed the recession of 2001 would be a “Great Recession.”
  • In “The Return of Depression Economics,” first published in 1999, Paul Krugman wrote about the “Great Recession” of his era.
  • The downturn of the early 1990s was on occasion referred to as the “Great Recession.” The term was especially used to describe the situation in Connecticut.
  • Some referred to the recessions of the 1980s as the Great Recession.
  • Forbes proclaimed “the Great Recession of 1979″ in an issue dated Nov. 26, 1979.
  • Before that, Forbes had proclaimed 1974-75 as the “Great Recession.” So did Newsweek, and so did this New York Times column.

And so on.

Why does this term keep cropping up, downturn after downturn? It does seem strange, after all, that experts keep portending “The Great Recession” for recessions that in retrospect might seem somewhat mild (or even nonexistent, according to the official Business Cycle Dating Committee).

Perhaps “Great Recession” claims return periodically because the term is vaguely punny, and people just like to appreciate a clever turn of phrase. Or perhaps its regular revivals have something to do with a near-eschatological desire to witness a downturn of epic, historical proportions. After all, as long as we’re suffering, we might as well brand the suffering so it’ll sound more impressive to our grandchildren.

None of this is to say, of course, that the current downturn won’t rightfully earn the title of “Great Recession” — only that the prior, relatively lax uses of the designation seem to dilute its fearsomeness.

Addendum: I’m not clear on when “The Great Depression” became officially known as “The Great Depression,” or even just a “depression.” In 1930, the economist John Maynard Keynes famously referred to it as “The Great Slump of 1930,” so it’s a wonder that label didn’t stick. The Oxford English Dictionary’s quotations section for the entry on the term “depression” includes the following chronology:

1934 A. HUXLEY Beyond Mexique Bay 233 Since the depression, books on Mexico have been almost as numerous..as books on Russia. 1935 ‘J. GUTHRIE’ Little Country xiii. 212 ‘I thought you had a baby.’ ‘No, darling,’ said Carol. ‘None of us are having them now. It’s the depression.’ 1935 Punch 19 June 719/1 All the wireless sets in Little Wobbly are pre-depression models. 1957 M. SHARP Eye of Love iii. 39 It was the Depression that had finished him off.

Feel free to share any information on the popularizing of the term “The Great Depression” (or, for that matter, “The Great Recession”) in the comments.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Here’s hoping that the term “Second Great Depression” does not replace the “Great Recession” the way the “Phoney War” of 1939-40 was replaced by “World War II.”

I prefer to call it the Very Good Depression, to differentiate from the Great Depression.

I doubt “Great Recession” is going to stick around this time. “Bush’s Depression” seems more likely.

The usual attribution of the phrase “Great Depression” is Herbert Hoover, 1931: “just a little depression.” Possibly apocryphal, because the citation always seems secondhand.

A man named Thomas McCarthy, who styles himself a ‘web entreprenuer’, issued a press release today (3/10) claiming that he coined the phrase ‘Great Recession’ in late 2008 and has since trademarked the term, and announcing that he has sued the International Monetary Fund for $10 million for unlawful use. Since a quick search of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office’s database shows no such trademark (surprise, surprise) presumably we’re all still safe in using this phrase for the rest of its useful life.

The cause of the great recession is a surge in technology which has changed the balance of power in work and amongst nations and with man and his environment. This will have to be sorted out in what could be thought of as a “Great Transition” or to be more cool “The Transition”. We are at the start of “THE TRANSITION”.

So it will be called “THE TRANSITION”

GOT IT?

That’s funny.

I’ve been calling it by various names since last November:

‘the great recession’

‘the mini-me depression’

‘the half a great depression’

or how about ‘hoovered again’

More newly popular phrases:
Casino capitalism = what we invested our 401k’s in over the last decade
Nouveau poor = take 1 nouveau riche circa October 2007 add 14 months
Uranus = GM’s new name for Saturn
And on and on the list goes….

Frankly, I think the choice of the name “Great Recession” is depressing (pardon the unfortunate pun.) The problem is that before the “Great” depression, all of what we would call today “recessions” were called “business depressions.” The “Great” depression was just the biggest “recession” in recent memory.

Unfortunately, the world was too cowardly (can you blame them?) to keep using the term “depression” or “business depression” after the Great Depression, so we came up with the term “recession” to describe business depressions.

I can’t see any reason we would have more resolve today than they did in the past. We’ve demonstrated so far that we’re mostly more egotistical, not smarter, than they were. So we can pretty much kiss the term “recession” goodbye right now if we call this the “Great Recession.” Rather than throw away another perfectly good word, I would rather we call this the second Great Depression. I think the problem with this is the ego problem I mentioned above. “Surely, we are much smarter than they were and will not have the same level of problem.” Nonsense.

So what new latin-root word, with at least three syllables, will we come up with for recessions in the future?

Jake,
Read Karl Marx. According to him, every depression is caused by a surge in technology that changes the balance between variable capital (labor power) and constant capital (the means of production).

In his book “The Defining Moment” about the first 100 days of the Roosevelt Administration, Jonathan Alter claims that Hoover himself prefered the term “depression” to describe what was happening around him to the more commonly used “panic”, as in “Panic of 1873″ or “Panic of 1907.” He thought “depression” sounded more technical and less depressing to voters than “panic.” [Sorry, don’t have the page reference].

Karl Marx used the word “depression” six times in Capital. Mostly in Chapter 15, section 7.

I’m a world researcher who was mentioned in William Safire’s “On Language column last Sunday. I just added both “Great Recession” and “Great Depression” to the economic terms on my web page.

“Great Recession” has no one “coiner.” Its first period of great frequency was during the credit crunch of 1974.

“Great Depression” shows up in a 1932 book title. President Herbert Hoover used “great depression” in speeches in 1930 and 1931, although the uses were low-key (non-capitalized).

//www.barrypopik.com/index.php/new_york_city/entry/great_recession/

//www.barrypopik.com/index.php/new_york_city/entry/great_depression/

Thanks for this. I was initially pleased at how clever that was, but then did the same exercise you did and realized how common it was in every deep recession. I suppose, as Richard Posner says, we should just break the taboo and bring back “depression.”

If the words “Great Depression” are too dire to consider, how about “Great Recession”? This is the term used by some “investors who specialize in distressed debt and bankruptcy,” Reuters reports. (See here: //news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090212/bs_nm/us_distresseddebt_investing_1)

According to these people, the economic trough will last “for at least three years, possibly long absent a revival in credit markets.”

And in the “while there’s breath, there’s hope” category, this Great Recession will provide bottom-feeders “with unprecedented opportunities.”

Via Stock Research Portal (//www.stockresearchportal.com)

Worried Store Owner March 12, 2009 · 2:53 pm

Let’s just call this one the “Bush Recession.”
Alisha

Worried Store Owner March 12, 2009 · 2:53 pm

Or, if things continue — the “Bush Depression.”

The fiasco over who coined the term “Great Recession” just got a bit more interesting. Like one commenter above said… “web-entrepreneur” Thomas McCarthy is taking the IMF to court over the trademark for “great recession”.

There is a video hosted @ //www.ClassTrip.org that specifically shows the trademark “Great Recession”. It was first used in commercial setting back in 2008.

McCarthy’s initial news release claiming the “Great Recession” trademark here—

//www.prlog.org/10196361-international-monetary-fund-being-sued-10m-over-trademark-infringement-for-great-recession.html
International Monetary Fund Being Sued $10M Over Trademark Infringement For ‘Great Recession’

The International Monetary Fund is being sued by a Phoenix-based entrepreneur for $10 million for the use of the trademarked phrase ‘Great Recession’.

PRLog (Press Release) – Mar 10, 2009 – Phoenix-based web entrepreneur Thomas McCarthy, who operates the financial blog //www.CollegeStock.com, today announced the commencement of litigation against the International Monetary Fund for the unlawful use of the trademarked phrase ‘Great Recession’.

McCarthy, who coined the phrase in late 2008 as evidenced by his domain name ClassTrip.org, is seeking $10,000,000 from the International Monetary Fund for the public use of his trademarked phrase ‘Great Recession’. “I was clearly the first individual to coin [and trademark] the phrase ‘Great Recession’ and I intend to seek damages from the International Monetary Fund through the U.S. court system,” added McCarthy.

In addition to a short clip highlighting ‘The Great Recession'(TM) within a video hosted at ClassTrip.org, the phrase in dispute is also publicly available on YouTube.

“thegreatrecession” was used in a domain name poem in late December of 2007

Let’s call things by its name and avoid further damage.

The dot-com burst was a real “Big Depression” and it should have been called that way.

But Bush’s team derailed that recovery by claiming that the situation was over, just 1 year later.

Tens of thousands of relived people switched jobs, entered the stock market and housing market.

But in reality, manufacturing never recovered. Nike, HP, Apple, GE and others became just empty shell companies and most all production shifted to China. Huge budgets were assigned to marketing and very few to innovation.

Although mainly jobless American consumers had access to cheap credit, so peopled flooded the home lone pipe buying houses at even greater markup.

What happened?

We all got confused and no fixing was done after the crash. If we want to survive this one, we must call it as it is. “The Second Great Depression” or “Great Depression 2″

Just now I see people talking about a rebound. Please refrain. Another upturn-downturn, could kill us all.

If you really want to know what is happening to the economy, who caused it, and what you can do about it, read our new book, The Great Recession Conspiracy at //www.scribd.com/doc/16864582/The-Great-Recession-Conspiracy. It also a Kindle book.

Then visit //thegreatrecessionconspiracy.blogspot.com to keep up to date and to vent.

You’ll find no BS. No math models. No arcane theories. Just plain facts, a short history lesson, and information you can use today.

James Taylor
David Zetland

The Great Recession is an unregistered trademark used in a commercial setting for the first time by The Dean of //www.CollegeStock.com.

Since The Dean trademarked the phrase Great Recession(TM) in early fall 2008, the popularity of it has skyrocketed.

//collegestock.com/blog/drum-roll-please-announcing-class-triptm-dubai/

It’s like calling a smaller-than-average person a large midget. Very clever.