The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20081101210931/http://hrw.org:80/english/docs/2004/10/29/isrlpa9577.htm
HUMAN RIGHTS
WATCH Human Rights News FrenchSpanishRussianKoreanArabicHebrewspacer
RSSPortugueseGermanChinesePersianMore Languagesspacer
   

Israel: 'Disengagement' Will Not End Gaza Occupation

Israeli Government Still Holds Responsibility for Welfare of Civilians

(New York, October 29, 2004) � The Israeli government�s plan to remove troops and Jewish settlements from the Gaza Strip would not end Israel�s occupation of the territory, Human Rights Watch said today. As an occupying power, Israel will retain responsibility for the welfare of Gaza�s civilian population.

" Under international law, the test for determining whether an occupation exists is effective control by a hostile army, not the positioning of troops. Whether the Israeli army is inside Gaza or redeployed around its periphery and restricting entrance and exit, it remains in control. "
Sarah Leah Whitson, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch�s Middle East and North Africa Division
  

Also Available in

french  german 

Related Material

Israel: Despite Gaza Pullout Plan, Home Demolitions Expand
Press Release, October 18, 2004

Razing Rafah: Mass Home Demolitions in the Gaza Strip
Report, October 18, 2004

Israel: Budget Discriminates Against Arab Citizens
Press Release, August 12, 2004

Israel: West Bank Barrier Violates Human Rights
Press Release, February 23, 2004

Under the �disengagement� plan endorsed Tuesday by the Knesset, Israeli forces will keep control over Gaza�s borders, coastline and airspace, and will reserve the right to launch incursions at will. Israel will continue to wield overwhelming power over the territory�s economy and its access to trade.  
 
�The removal of settlers and most military forces will not end Israel�s control over Gaza,� said Sarah Leah Whitson, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch�s Middle East and North Africa Division. �Israel plans to reconfigure its occupation of the territory, but it will remain an occupying power with responsibility for the welfare of the civilian population.�  
 
Under the plan, Israel is scheduled to remove settlers and military bases protecting the settlers from the Gaza Strip and four isolated West Bank Jewish settlements by the end of 2005. The Israeli military will remain deployed on Gaza�s southern border, and will reposition its forces to other areas just outside the territory.  
 
In addition to controlling the borders, coastline and airspace, Israel will continue to control Gaza�s telecommunications, water, electricity and sewage networks, as well as the flow of people and goods into and out of the territory. Gaza will also continue to use Israeli currency.  
 
A World Bank study on the economic effects of the plan determined that �disengagement� would ease restrictions on mobility inside Gaza. But the study also warned that the removal of troops and settlers would have little positive effect unless accompanied by an opening of Gaza�s borders. If the borders are sealed to labor and trade, the plan �would create worse hardship than is seen today.�  
 
The plan also explicitly envisions continued home demolitions by the Israeli military to expand the �buffer zone� along the Gaza-Egypt border. According to a report released last week by Human Rights Watch, the Israeli military has illegally razed nearly 1,600 homes since 2000 to create this buffer zone, displacing some 16,000 Palestinians. Israeli officials have called for the buffer zone to be doubled, which would result in the destruction of one-third of the Rafah refugee camp.  
 
In addition, the plan states that disengagement �will serve to dispel the claims regarding Israel�s responsibility for the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.� A report by legal experts from the Israeli Justice Ministry, Foreign Ministry and the military made public on Sunday, however, reportedly acknowledges that disengagement �does not necessarily exempt Israel from responsibility in the evacuated territories.�  
 
If Israel removes its troops from Gaza, the Palestinian National Authority will maintain responsibility for security within the territory�to the extent that Israel allows Palestinian police the authority and capacity. Palestinian security forces will still have a duty to protect civilians within Gaza and to prevent indiscriminate attacks on Israeli civilians.  
 
�Under international law, the test for determining whether an occupation exists is effective control by a hostile army, not the positioning of troops,� Whitson said. �Whether the Israeli army is inside Gaza or redeployed around its periphery and restricting entrance and exit, it remains in control.�  
 
Under international law, the duties of an occupying power are detailed in the Fourth Geneva Convention and The Hague Regulations. According to The Hague Regulations, a �territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army. The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised.�  
 
The �disengagement plan,� as adopted by the Israeli Cabinet on June 6, 2004, and endorsed by the Knesset on October 26, is available at:  
http://www.pmo.gov.il/nr/exeres/C5E1ACE3-9834-414E-9512-8E5F509E9A4D.htm.

HRW Logo Contribute to Human Rights Watch

Home | About Us | News Releases | Publications | Info by Country | Global Issues | Campaigns | Community | Store | Film Festival | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | Press Contacts | Privacy Policy

� Copyright 2006, Human Rights Watch �� 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor �� New York, NY 10118-3299 �� USA