The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20110629153840/http://www.stormingmedia.us/01/0155/A015524.html
Storming Media: Pentagon Reports and DocumentsPentagon Reports: Fast. Definitive. Complete.     
New Account »
Forgot Password?
Advanced Search »
AviationAttack and Fighter Aircraft

Air Force Culture and Conventional Strategic Airpower

Authors: James M. Ford; AIR UNIV PRESS MAXWELL AFB AL
Abstract:
The Air Force was founded upon the precepts of strategic bombing. Hugh Trenchard, Giulio Douhet, and Billy Mitchell pioneered early airpower doctrine while the Air Corps Tactical School refined and developed it to eventually form the blueprint for American bombing in World War Two. After the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, nuclear strategic airpower stole the limelight from its conventional counterpart. The Air Force blossomed under the national strategy of Massive Retaliation because its long range heavy bombers were the preeminent delivery platform for nuclear weapons. Thus SAC s bomber pilots dominated the service to the point strategic airpower became synonymous with nuclear weapons while TAC operated in the shadows of Air Force respectability striving to maintain its legitimacy despite the ambiguous effects of strategic airpower in Korea. Technology and the impact of the Vietnam War started a shift in Air Force culture from bombers to fighters that has seen the pendulum swing to the other extreme where fighter pilots run the service at the expense of conventional strategic airpower. After Vietnam, the Air Force seemed preoccupied with the European theater and AirLand Battle doctrine that did not require conventional strategic airpower. It is the contention of this author that a shift in culture from bombers to fighters has not changed the essence of airpower, but it has led to a decline in emphasis on conventional strategic operations. If there is a lesson to be learned from this shift it is the importance of understanding airpower and its applications. Desert Storm proved the essence of airpower has not changed, even bringing conventional strategic bombing into the spotlight. It should not matter who runs the Air Force as long as they understand the full potential of airpower strategic as well as tactical.

Limitations: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Description: Master's thesis
Pages: 87
Report Date: 1993
Report Number: A015524
Keywords relating to this report:
*AIR POWER
*BOMBER AIRCRAFT
*FIGHTER AIRCRAFT
*STRATEGIC BOMBING
AIR FORCE
BOMBING
COSTS
CULTURE
DOCTRINE
EUROPE
JET FIGHTERS
MILITARY OPERATIONS
NUCLEAR WEAPONS
PILOTS
THEATER LEVEL OPERATIONS
VIETNAM WAR
Adobe PDF - $18.95
Printed Format - $29.95
Please check the box for the format you wish to order.
Shipping Terms
About Electronic Delivery

Email This Abstract