The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20141006132629/http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/30/business/media/30carr.html?pagewanted=all

Business Day Media & Advertising

The Media Equation

An Outsider Making Waves in Hollywood

Monica Almeida/The New York Times

Janice Min, center, at a staff meeting for The Hollywood Reporter, which she has turned into a sharp weekly.

  • comments
  • Print
  • Reprints

Los Angeles

Monica Almeida/The New York Times

Janice Min left US Weekly for The Hollywood Reporter.

On an unusually clear day in West Hollywood last week, Janice Min took a seat at the Soho House, the full expanse of the Hollywood Hills serving as a backdrop for lunch. It was odd to see Ms. Min, a fixture of Manhattan magazine publishing, here in a city that has been accused of reading little more than the large type plastered on vanity billboards lining Sunset Boulevard, which lies below us.

Ms. Min, who took over US Weekly from Bonnie Fuller in 2003, brought a strong sense of packaging along with a deft high-low touch, and she doubled its circulation by the time she left in 2009. Then, improbably, she moved to Los Angeles 10 months ago to remake The Hollywood Reporter, a down-on-its-luck daily trade magazine that was losing a horse-and-buggy race with Variety. The competition seemed a little beside the point at a time when Web personalities like Nikki Finke were terrorizing and fascinating the industry.

“I don’t think one person told me it was a good idea. Not one,” Ms. Min said about her decision to become editorial director of The Hollywood Reporter.

Except it seems to be working. Ms. Min, a demure Columbia graduate who knows her way around a Diane Von Furstenberg dress, took the also-ran daily built to break news and turned it into a large-format glossy weekly. The breaking news was pushed to a redesigned Web site. In print, instead of quick blurbs about comings and goings, she published 3,000-word profiles of and about Hollywood, plus plenty of juicy photo galleries and lighter items.

From April 2010 to this April, traffic to hollywoodreporter.com rose to 4.5 million unique visitors a month, an increase of 800 percent, according to comScore. Circulation for the weekly has inched up over 70,000, which seems small, but it reaches a pretty rarefied demographic. Richard Beckman, who runs Prometheus Global Media, the magazine’s parent company, says ad revenue for the weekly is up 50 percent over what the daily version brought in. The cover of the weekly, which began publishing last November, has become prized real estate, a place where talent and executives love to see their products and mugs.

It’s all very lovely to behold, but of course, that’s no guarantee that it will be a great business as well. It will be several years before we know whether the big investment in the good-looking magazine will yield pretty numbers as well.

“They managed to change the subject by going weekly,” said Terry Press, a longtime entertainment marketing consultant and a fan of print. “The large photos, lush paper stock and great design are a kind of narcotic here.”

All that remains of the legacy product is most of the staff and that iconic name.

“The trades were making uninteresting products about a very interesting business,” Mr. Beckman said. “When we bought it, people said, ‘Forget it, it’s dead.’ And then when we announced the plan to put the news on the Web, transform a daily into a weekly, we were ruining a venerable institution that was 80 years old. And now some of the biggest skeptics are telling us it is just what the industry needs.”

Ms. Min, as it turned out, was the necessary interloper.

“When you are on the inside, you don’t realize bad things are happening as they’re happening,” she said. “I really don’t think an insider could have come in from here and remade The Hollywood Reporter. I think you had to have been an outsider.”

She’d like it to stay that way. Ms. Min, who acknowledges not missing all that much about New York, except her friends, does not want to go completely native.

“I always worried in the back of my head, ‘Am I going to become an awful person, one of those people who is screaming at someone to go get my dry cleaning?,’ ” she said. “I like the people here, but I don’t have a deep investment in becoming one of them.”

Many magazine editors are known for cutting a wide swath in their own offices and beyond. Ms. Min has never been big on acting big. For much of an editorial planning meeting last Tuesday for The Hollywood Reporter’s weekly magazine, Ms. Min was content to let Owen Phillips, the executive editor, run through the schedule.

But somewhere in the middle of the meeting, a proposed picture for the back page, a strong, iconic image drawn from the trade magazine’s 80-year history, is slid down the table for inspection. After being handed a picture of a back-in-the-day Stan Lee, the comics genius, posing with some badly dressed superheroes, Ms. Min cocked her head to the side as she took a skeptical look. Bill Higgins, a reporter who was hired away from Variety, said, “I know that look, I’ll keep looking.”

Not many editors seem as content to just let people do their jobs.

“That is an illusion,” said Stephen Galloway, the executive editor for features who has worked at The Hollywood Reporter on and off since 1993. “I have never worked for an editor who is as in charge as she is. We all know by now what she wants and work hard to deliver it.”

“There was a great deal of anxiety when she came here,” he added. “There really was no counterargument — it was either radical change or die, but she was coming from US Weekly, which is a consumer magazine built on celebrity and gossip. We were all asking ourselves what this paper would become.”

The answer, it turns out, is a magazine, and a pretty good one. Mr. Galloway’s profile of Scott Rudin, the New York film and theater producer, was something of a model. At more than 3,000 words, it flicked at some of his rougher edges, but in the main, gave Mr. Rudin his due for a remarkable run of success in film and on Broadway. Ms. Min also quickly hired Kim Masters, a longtime industry reporter who was known for going long in Vanity Fair and The Daily Beast, along with deeply reported features for NPR.

“I think it was counterintuitive to be introducing a magazine in this day and age,” Ms. Masters said. “There is something flattering and exciting about the permanence of paper, and we committed to doing serious journalism at a time when there has been this onslaught of hit-and-run bloggers.”

The Reporter has had its share of scoops, including articles about Jeff Gaspin being pushed out at NBC and an exclusive about Stephen McPherson resigning from ABC after a sexual harassment inquiry, but there also have been two love letters to “American Idol” on its return to dominance and a valentine about the lucrative bromance between Michael Bay and James Cameron.

At a time when consumers are conversant in all manner of entertainment business concerns, like box office numbers, Ms. Min said, The Hollywood Reporter has room to grow into something more than a glossy newsletter of insiders. And it doesn’t have to lop off the heads of everyone to land with impact.

“Historically, if you happen to transcend into the larger universe of media coverage, it was usually because people thought you were a fool, your job was on the line, you are responsible for something failing,” she said. “There’s this perception I think both outside and inside here that people love failure here, and some of that is true, but it’s not the whole story.”

E-mail: carr@nytimes.com;
Twitter.com/carr2n

  • comments
  • Print
  • Reprints
Get Free E-mail Alerts on These Topics