The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20150204035854/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/12/141218-deep-ocean-micro-plastic-fibers-trash-discovery/
National Geographic News
A photo of people walking along a trash-strewn beach in Mumbai.

A family walks on a garbage-strewn beach in Mumbai in June 2012. According to a new report, a huge amount of microplastic has accumulated at the bottom of the sea.

Photograph by Vivek Prakash, Reuters/Corbis

Laura Parker

National Geographic

Published December 18, 2014

When Spanish scientist Andres Cozar Cabanas compiled the first ever global map of ocean trash last July, he inadvertently uncovered a mystery. Much of the plastic he expected to find bobbing in the oceans, given a quadrupling of plastic production in recent years, had "disappeared."

In a new study, published this week by the journal Royal Society Open Science, a British scientist reports the riddle of the "missing" plastic as solved: It sits in deep waters, broken down into tiny fibers and embedded in the sediment of the most remote places on Earth.

"The deep-sea floor appears to provide an answer to the question, where is all the plastic?" says Richard Thompson, a marine biologist at Plymouth University in the U.K.

The discovery of microplastic in such remote marine habitats raises new questions about the potential for plastic debris to contaminate the food chain. Scientists have already documented that fish, birds, turtles, and other marine animals eat plastic. Thompson and his team found an even greater accumulation of plastic than previously suspected. The more plastic there is, he says, the more potential for toxicity to marine life.

In the study, Thompson and his team concluded that every square kilometer of deep ocean contains about four billion plastic fibers—most are two to three centimeters in length and as thin as a human hair. The fibers are four times more abundant in the deep sea than in surface and coastal waters.

Chelsea Rochman, a marine ecologist at the University of California, Davis, who studies the effects of plastic retrieved from the stomachs of fish and shellfish, was not surprised that Thompson's team found the "missing" plastic in the deep sea.

"Every time they look somewhere for plastic debris, they find it. What is surprising is that what they are finding is that most of this is fibers."

Kara Lavender Law, an oceanographer at the Sea Education Association in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, was also surprised that the fibers were so widespread. "The more we look, the more we find," she says. "I was surprised that they found microfibers in every core of all the regions sampled."

Thompson first called attention to ocean debris in 2004, when he concluded that most marine debris was plastic, overturning the general view that ocean trash consisted of wood, cloth, fishing gear, and other discarded items.

"Our results show evidence for a large and hitherto unknown repository of microplastics," Thompson wrote. "The prevalence of microfibers in all sediment cores and on all coral colonies examined suggests this contaminant is ubiquitous in the deep sea."

Lucy Woodall, a zoologist at the Natural History Museum in London and one of the study's authors, noted that the challenge for marine scientists has been to document the eventual resting place for ocean plastic. "It is alarming to find such high levels of contamination, especially when the full effect of plastics on the delicate balance of deep sea ecosystems is unknown," she says.

Thompson's team analyzed samples collected from 16 sites during seven research cruises between September 2001 and August 2012 in the Mediterranean Sea and in the southwest Indian and northeast Atlantic Oceans—a huge expanse that included subtropical to subpolar seas. The samples were collected by a remotely operated vehicle in submarine canyons, continental slopes, and basins. The scientists wore natural-fiber clothing to avoid contaminating their samples.

Samples collected from four locations in the Indian Ocean showed that microfibers had accumulated on the surface of coral. Most of the fibers were blue, black, green, or red, although Thompson noted that his team also collected pink, purple, and turquoise fibers.

Surprisingly, more than half of the fibers collected contained rayon, a man-made synthetic polymer that was more than twice as abundant as polyester, the next most prevalent fiber.

Follow Laura Parker on Twitter.

Related video: Creating Art From a Plastic Ocean
27 comments
Wally Marshall
Wally Marshall

Being an engineer, an environmentalist, a realist and possibly a few other characteristics I can honestly say I don't have answers to the earths obvious problems. With around six billion (and climbing) citizens on earth I would think that pretty soon there will have to be a huge market for condoms because the food chain will start to disintegrate after all the animals are gone and we become vegan or vegetarian (not sure which). I guess I shouldn't worry about it because I will have long since turned to dust anyway. Enjoy life while you have it folks.

jas stellar
jas stellar

In a few thousand years (if humans are still around) they will look back at these days and probably think 'Gee, we were so primitive, dirty and uncaring back then..it's a wonder we as a species survived at all'.

Phil Ligon
Phil Ligon

Looks like all the trash is from Asia. Seem to me they are deliberately dumping trash into the waterways. You don't see this kind of debris in the Atlantic Ocean.

Elise VB
Elise VB

It is NOT a final resting place for the plastic, it just becomes part of the food chain, eventually damaging the fish and birds and us!  Not to mention the damage it is doing to coral reefs of the world, a very necessary part of our ecosystem!!!


"The discovery of microplastic in such remote marine habitats raises new questions about the potential for plastic debris to contaminate the food chain. Scientists have already documented that fish, birds, turtles, and other marine animals eat plastic. Thompson and his team found an even greater accumulation of plastic than previously suspected. The more plastic there is, he says, the more potential for toxicity to marine life."


So, no, it is not a viable option to just let it accumulate. We need to reduce our dependency on plastic products. 

Владимир Предоев
Владимир Предоев

Regardless of how ignorant and careless we tend to be nature has come up with a solution to all our plastic paradise. I`ve heard that scientists had discovered a plastic "eating"bacteria that brakes it down to a harmless products. so again - mother nature finds a solution for us, although the case is unprecedented. Plastic hasn`t been in existence since recent years and is completely artificial regarding our planet. Yet through mutations bacteria can transfer this undegradable otherwise substance and incorporate it in a safe way in the circle of life. 


Shame on us for letting such a scenario happen in the first place. 

David Jones
David Jones

Every problem is a potential opportunity. Given the plastics are basically pre-processed for reclamation, it should be possible to "mine" these plastic rich areas and recycle the plastics into usable form.  This would seem to be a valid avenue for government investment to kick start a new "green" industry.

Erica Gilstrap
Erica Gilstrap

one day we'll realize that what we dispose of is then again consumed.  it is the life cycle. when we start treating the earth like we should treat our bodies, life expectancy would probably double.  eating fish that eat plastic and swim in nuclear waste and oil spills = cancer.  being vegan means not eating cancer, not contributing to methane pollution, not contributing to deforestation and water waste for agriculture, not contributing to ocean depletion, and it means compassion for the planet and ALL who live here.  consider it.

Paul Tabone
Paul Tabone

We treat the air and the water as huge sewers in their own ways. And the "civilized" world doesn't mind where anything goes as long as it doesn't affect them. Until Flounder and Cod start sprouting plastic dorsal fins, dumping in the sea will be considered acceptable to too many people. As a boater for over 50 years, I have seen things first hand that are disheartening. And yes, I know, being a boater in and of itself is another means of polluting the seas, but I never dumped anything overboard on purpose. All garbage and sewage was brought to the proper disposal locations. Sadly I too generated water and air pollution from the engines.

Gerry Vankoughnett
Gerry Vankoughnett

The title of this article is misleading as rayon is the primary source of man made fibres discovered in the study.

Rayon is cellulose based and is NOT plastic and was produced 50 years before any plastic by products from petroleum.


Dash Riprock
Dash Riprock

The delicate balance of the deep sea? It's a vast desert for the most part and since the irresponsibly discarded plastic has to end up somewhere I can think of no better place.

Janice H.
Janice H.

@David Jones As horrible as this discovery is, I think you are right. The potential for mining of a cheap green alternative to the creation of plastic may help bolster the green movement. I just hope the collection of such materials doesn't do more damage than it is worth.

Nate Bugmenot
Nate Bugmenot

@Erica Gilstrap 


The concern is less about fish eating the plastic than microorganisms, plankton and krill trying to incorporate it and simply dying, leaving something else in their place that the fish can't eat at all.


A vegan or vegetarian diet can have a smaller footprint, but you need to be aware of the agricultural methods that go into your food. Not every non-vegan is eating large amounts of red meat or tuna in the first place. Traceability is more important than specific food choices.

Janice H.
Janice H.

@Erica Gilstrap But even Vegans drive cars and use unclean electricity. Being vegan may help, but it certainly isn't the solution.

Nate Bugmenot
Nate Bugmenot

@Gerry Vankoughnett 


Rayon is a semi-synthetic plastic. Not all plastics are petro-plastics - you can also make polyethylene from ethanol, but that doesn't make bioplastics necessarily more amenable to use by living systems. Microfibers of rayon in the wrong place will still cause chaos.


Life is pretty finely tuned negentropy, and you'll need to present a prety strong case to meaningfully distinguish rayon microfibers in the environment from any other synthetics. Whatever it is, it doesn't belong there and the life there isn't expecting it.

dave powelson
dave powelson

@Gerry Vankoughnett Good point.  It's hard to believe Rayon (cellulose) is more common than petroleum-based plastics.  Of course
 the phrase "more than half of the fibers collected CONTAINED rayon" could be simply mean a tiny fraction of the fiber mass is Rayon.

Janice H.
Janice H.

@Dash Riprock The deep sea is abundant with life, it is just different from what you see in more coastal waters. What is there is very small, or very large, very rarely is it in between. The deep sea floor has barely been discovered, much less explored, and life is incredibly abundant - just look at the deep sea vents. Those foster thousands of different kinds of life - yes many are bacteria, but those are just as important to the balance of the ocean's over all ecosystem as fish and other underwater mammals. 

Austin B.
Austin B.

A vast desert? Sounds like you really know your stuff.

N A
N A

@Janice H. @Владимир Предоев Humans aren't trying to destroy nature any more than any other species is trying to destroy nature. In both cases, the organism pushes boundaries to their maximum and then natural forces of supply, demand, and physics (energy) act to push back until some equilibrium point is met.

Lorretta Rollinson
Lorretta Rollinson

@Nate Bugmenot @Erica Gilstrap 

Vegans deplete the green fodder that is part of natures cycle , by eating plants they prevent photosynthesis and the removal of carbon dioxide from the air by PLANTS , and then prevent the return of oxygen to the air , by the plants , plants are now killed to feed people who refuse to eat a balanced diet and ignore the detrimental effects their actions have  on the plants life cycle 

Nate Bugmenot
Nate Bugmenot

@N A


You discount the effect of lost diversity, which takes millions of years to establish and balance, but which we can wipe out in centuries.

Nate Bugmenot
Nate Bugmenot

@Lorretta Rollinson


Vegans aren't chewing their way through the temperate forests: or at least not any more than anyone else, and usually less. Carbon cycling isn't confined to farm fields.


Farm animals eat plants too - in fact the energy in every kind of food you can eat is photosynthesised by a plant, from sunlight, using carbon from the air. Farmed animals eating those plants have to feed both their own lives and yours, meaning they use a larger land and carbon footprint than just eating the plants yourself.


The question of balanced diet is personal, and whether you act to the detriment of plants is about how the plants were grown, not whether you eat them straight or let another animal eat them first.

Share

Popular Stories

The Future of Food

  • Why Food Matters

    Why Food Matters

    How do we feed nine billion people by 2050, and how do we do so sustainably?

  • Download: Free iPad App

    Download: Free iPad App

    We've made our magazine's best stories about the future of food available in a free iPad app.

See more food news, photos, and videos »