Academia.eduAcademia.edu
conference 10 2014 lti rome conference: infrastructure-Driven Development to conjure away the eu malaise? actualité auteur M. NICOLAS J. FIRZLI 2014 LTI Rome Conference: Infrastructure-Driven Development to Conjure Away the EU Malaise? Some of Europe’s prominent economic thought leaders and reform-minded policy makers were gathered in Rome on December 12 2014 for the “Investing in Long-Term Europe” conference. Debates focused on the merits of enhanced infrastructure investments to put the EU back on a steady growth trajectory. l uigi Abete, Chairman, FEBAF (Federazione delle Banche, delle Assicurazioni e della Finanza) and President, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL, BNP Paribas Group), Rintaro Tamaki, Deputy Secretary General, OECD, and Jonathan Hill, EU Commissioner for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets, set the stage for the day’s debates. Mr. Abete remarked that “infrastructures represent the backbone for growth … [that foster] technological innovation, a greener economy and smart cities… They constitute the key to return to growth and bring the EU back on the right track”. He also expressed support for EU Commission President Juncker’s bold €315bn Infrastructure Investment Plan. BROADENING EU FISCAL & STATUTORY LAW, FOSTERING A REFORMIST, PROGRESSIVE RECOVERY Professor Franco Bassanini, Chairman of The Long-Term Investors Club (LTIC), President of Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, argued that exceptional circumstances required a non-dogmatic interpretation of the Treaty of Lisbon: “applying the European Treaty while ignoring the flexibility clause [Article 352 of the TFEU] is akin to applying the penal code in case of homicide without taking into account country attractiveness vs. aDvancement of transportation infrastructure Perceveid LT economic attractiveness 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 (Modified) Rail Transportation Infrastructure Index (M-RTI) Source: World Pensions Council proprietary research (M-RTI indices); Euromoney country risk database (ECR) as of Dec. 5 2014. the right of self-defense”. Raffaele Della Croce, Lead Manager, Long Term Investment (LTI), OECD, presented the latest allocation metrics for institutional asset owners; Edoardo Reviglio, Chief Economist, CDP, discussed the role of short-term market participants in long-term investments; and Fausto Felli, Cofounder & President, INTEGRATE, insisted on the financially beneficial features of social infrastructure for both public and private investors. Pier Carlo Padoan, Italian Minister of Economy and Finance and ECOFIN President, stressed the need to act boldly and pragmatically in the current circumstances at both EU and national levels. Michel Sapin, French Minister of Finance, concurred, adding that “EU budgetary and fiscal policy wasn’t some kind of sacrosanct idol” [‘un monstre sacré’], insisting that, unlike a rise in consumer-led aggregate demand, “smart” investment in infrastructure had long-lasting positive effects on industrial productivity and overall economic efficiency. Pierre Moscovici, EU Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs, sounded a cautiously optimistic note, reminding the audience that “the economy of the continent faces the risk of a long period of disappointingly low growth if we fail to succeed in closing the investment gap. We collectively made huge progress in the last months in recognizing the risks, and putting in place a clear and flexible framework to take on this challenge.” JANVIER FEVRIER MARS 2015 analyse financière n° 54 ECONOMIC ATTRACTIVENESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT M. Nicolas J. Firzli, Director-General, World Pensions Council (WPC), and member of the Board of Advisory Partners, World Bank Group Global Infrastructure Facility (GIF), insisted that EU policy makers, public lenders and development banks will need to assess thoroughly the tangible interest of future infrastructure investments one project at a time, an effort for which prospective pension and insurance co-investors from sophisticated jurisdictions such as Alberta, California, Ontario, Switzerland and the UK can play a decisive part. Mr. Firzli also shared with the audience the latest version of the WPC “Perceived Economic Attractiveness” (EA) and “Rail Infrastructure Development” (as measured by the Modified RTI Index) comparative policy framework 1 showing the relative modernity and cost-efficiency of national rail networks (or lack thereof). Sweden (RTI: 61 / EA: 76) and China (RTI: 94 / EA: 62) clearly stand out, while countries such as Luxembourg, Canada and Germany are still viewed as attractive investment destinations in spite of their low to mediocre grades when it comes to transportation infrastructure... M (1) See also Firzli, M.N. & Bazi, V. (2013). "Transportation Infrastructure and Country Attractiveness." Revue Analyse Financière N°48, pp. 67-68