Advertisement
Opinion| Volume 34, ISSUE 5, P400-415, May 2019

Download started.

Ok

The Ecology of Nonecological Speciation and Nonadaptive Radiations

Published:February 26, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.012

      Highlights

      Nonadaptive radiations result from nonecological speciation and the absence of character displacement.
      There are properties of organisms and ecosystems that make nonadaptive radiations more or less likely.
      As our understanding of cryptic species increases, we are likely to become aware of more nonadaptive radiations.
      Nonadaptive radiations can give rise to functional redundancy in ecosystems, which is likely to be correlated with resilience and/or resistance to perturbation.
      Understanding the ecology of why competitive exclusion is mitigated is essential for the conservation of biodiversity.
      Growing evidence for lineage diversification that occurs without strong ecological divergence (i.e., nonadaptive radiation) challenges assumptions about the buildup and maintenance of species in evolutionary radiations, particularly when ecologically similar and thus potentially competing species co-occur. Understanding nonadaptive radiations involves identifying conditions conducive to both the nonecological generation of species and the maintenance of co-occurring ecologically similar species. To borrow MacArthur’s [
      • MacArthur R.H.
      Coexistence of species.
      ] (Challenging Biological Problems 1972;253–259) form of inquiry, the ecology of nonadaptive radiations can be understood as follows: for species of type A, in environments of type B, nonadaptive radiations may emerge. We review purported cases of nonadaptive radiation and suggest properties of organisms, resources, and landscapes that might be conducive to their origin and maintenance. These properties include poor dispersal ability and the ephemerality and patchiness of resources.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      Read-It-Now

      Purchase access to all full-text HTML articles for 6 or 36 hr at a low cost. Click here to explore this opportunity.

      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Trends in Ecology & Evolution
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • MacArthur R.H.
        Coexistence of species.
        in: Behnke J.A. Challenging Biological Problems. Oxford University Press, 1972: 253-259
        • Gulick J.T.
        On the variation of species as related to their geographical distribution, illustrated by the Achatinellinæ.
        Nature. 1872; 6: 222
        • Mayr E.
        Animal Species and Evolution.
        Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1963
        • Wright S.
        Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Volume 4: Variability Within and Among Natural Populations.
        University of Chicago Press, 1984
        • Rundell R.J.
        Snails on an evolutionary tree: Gulick, speciation, and isolation.
        Am. Malacol. Bull. 2011; 29: 145-157
        • Gittenberger E.
        What about non-adaptive radiation?.
        Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 1991; 43: 263-272
        • Rundell R.J.
        • Price T.D.
        Adaptive radiation, nonadaptive radiation, ecological speciation and nonecological speciation.
        Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009; 24: 394-399
        • Maestri R.
        • et al.
        The ecology of a continental evolutionary radiation: is the radiation of sigmodontine rodents adaptive?.
        Evolution. 2017; 71: 610-632
        • Svensson E.I.
        Non-ecological speciation, niche conservatism and thermal adaptation: how are they connected?.
        Org. Divers. Evol. 2012; 12: 229-240
        • Lee-Yaw J.A.
        • Irwin D.E.
        The importance (or lack thereof) of niche divergence to the maintenance of a northern species complex: the case of the long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum Baird).
        J. Evol. Biol. 2015; 28: 917-930
        • Reaney A.M.
        • et al.
        Macroevolutionary diversification with limited niche disparity in a species-rich lineage of cold-climate lizards.
        BMC Evol. Biol. 2018; 18: 16
        • Kuchta S.R.
        • et al.
        Disintegrating over space and time: paraphyly and species delimitation in the Wehrle’s salamander complex.
        Zool. Scr. 2018; 47: 285-299
        • Wachter G.A.
        • et al.
        Glacial refugia, recolonization patterns and diversification forces in Alpine-endemic Megabunus harvestmen.
        Mol. Ecol. 2016; 25: 2904-2919
        • Barley A.J.
        • et al.
        The challenge of species delimitation at the extremes: diversification without morphological change in Philippine sun skinks.
        Evolution. 2013; 67: 3556-3572
        • Givnish T.J.
        Adaptive radiation and molecular systematics: issues and approaches.
        in: Givnish T.J. Systma K.J. Molecular Evolution and Adaptive Radiation. Cambridge University Press, 1997: 1-54
        • Givnish T.J.
        • et al.
        Adaptive radiation, correlated and contingent evolution, and net species diversification in Bromeliaceae.
        Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2014; 71: 55-78
        • Gillespie R.
        Community assembly through adaptive radiation in Hawaiian spiders.
        Science. 2004; 303: 356-359
        • Cotoras D.D.
        • et al.
        Co-occurrence of ecologically similar species of Hawaiian spiders reveals critical early phase of adaptive radiation.
        BMC Evol. Biol. 2018; 18: 100
        • Schluter D.
        The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation.
        Oxford University Press, 2000
        • Givnish T.J.
        Adaptive radiation versus “radiation” and “explosive diversification”: why conceptual distinctions are fundamental to understanding evolution.
        New Phytol. 2015; 207: 297-303
        • Simpson G.G.
        The Major Features of Evolution.
        Columbia University Press, 1953
        • Jablonski D.
        Approaches to macroevolution: 2. Sorting of variation, some overarching issues, and general conclusions.
        Evol. Biol. 2017; 44: 451-475
        • Losos J.B.
        • Miles D.B.
        Testing the hypothesis that a clade has adaptively radiated: iguanid lizard clades as a case study.
        Am. Nat. 2002; 160: 147-157
        • Warren D.L.
        • et al.
        Mistaking geography for biology: inferring processes from species distributions.
        Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014; 29: 572-580
        • Simões M.
        • et al.
        The evolving theory of evolutionary radiations.
        Trends Ecol. Evol. 2016; 31: 27-34
        • Olson M.E.
        • Arroyo-Santos A.
        Thinking in continua: beyond the “adaptive radiation” metaphor.
        Bioessays. 2009; 31: 1337-1346
        • Kisel Y.
        • Barraclough T.G.
        Speciation has a spatial scale that depends on levels of gene flow.
        Am. Nat. 2010; 175: 316-334
        • Claramunt S.
        • et al.
        High dispersal ability inhibits speciation in a continental radiation of passerine birds.
        Proc. Biol. Sci. 2012; 279: 1567-1574
        • Riginos C.
        • et al.
        Dispersal capacity predicts both population genetic structure and species richness in reef fishes.
        Am. Nat. 2014; 184: 52-64
        • Agnarsson I.
        • et al.
        A multi-clade test supports the intermediate dispersal model of biogeography.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9e86780
        • Gillespie R.G.
        • et al.
        Long-distance dispersal: a framework for hypothesis testing.
        Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012; 27: 47-56
        • Clouse R.M.
        • Giribet G.
        When Thailand was an island – the phylogeny and biogeography of mite harvestmen (Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi, Stylocellidae) in Southeast Asia: the biogeography of Southeast Asian mite harvestmen.
        J. Biogeogr. 2010; 37: 1114-1130
        • Boyer S.L.
        • Giribet G.
        A new model Gondwanan taxon: systematics and biogeography of the harvestman family Pettalidae (Arachnida, Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi), with a taxonomic revision of genera from Australia and New Zealand.
        Cladistics. 2007; 23: 337-361
        • Price T.D.
        Speciation in Birds.
        Roberts & Company, 2007
        • Darwin C.
        Transplantation of shells.
        Nature. 1878; 18: 120
        • van Leeuwen C.H.A.
        • van der Velde G.
        Prerequisites for flying snails: external transport potential of aquatic snails by waterbirds.
        Freshw. Sci. 2012; 31: 963-972
        • Palumbi S.R.
        Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation.
        Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1994; 25: 547-572
        • Leishman M.R.
        • et al.
        The evolutionary ecology of seed size.
        in: Fenner M. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. 2nd edn. CAB International, 2000: 31-57
        • Cerca J.
        • et al.
        Marine connectivity dynamics: clarifying cosmopolitan distributions of marine interstitial invertebrates and the meiofauna paradox.
        Mar. Biol. 2018; 165: 123
        • Atherton S.
        • Jondelius U.
        Wide distributions and cryptic diversity within a Microstomum (Platyhelminthes) species complex.
        Zool. Scr. 2018; 47: 486-498
        • Crisp M.D.
        • Cook L.G.
        Phylogenetic niche conservatism: what are the underlying evolutionary and ecological causes?.
        New Phytol. 2012; 196: 681-694
        • Pyron R.A.
        • et al.
        Phylogenetic niche conservatism and the evolutionary basis of ecological speciation.
        Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2015; 90: 1248-1262
        • Levis N.A.
        • Pfennig D.W.
        Evaluating “plasticity-first” evolution in nature: key criteria and empirical approaches.
        Trends Ecol. Evol. 2016; 31: 563-574
        • Schneider R.F.
        • Meyer A.
        How plasticity, genetic assimilation and cryptic genetic variation may contribute to adaptive radiations.
        Mol. Ecol. 2017; 26: 330-350
        • Campbell C.R.
        • et al.
        What is speciation genomics? The roles of ecology, gene flow, and genomic architecture in the formation of species.
        Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 2018; 124: 561-583
        • Nosil P.
        Ecological Speciation.
        Oxford University Press, 2012
        • Li Z.
        • et al.
        Multiple large-scale gene and genome duplications during the evolution of hexapods.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018; 115: 4713-4718
        • Landis J.B.
        • et al.
        Impact of whole-genome duplication events on diversification rates in angiosperms.
        Am. J. Bot. 2018; 105: 348-363
        • Mendelson T.C.
        • Shaw K.L.
        Sexual behaviour: rapid speciation in an arthropod.
        Nature. 2005; 433: 375-376
        • Arnegard M.E.
        • et al.
        Sexual signal evolution outpaces ecological divergence during electric fish species radiation.
        Am. Nat. 2010; 176: 335-356
        • Mason N.A.
        • et al.
        Song evolution, speciation, and vocal learning in passerine birds.
        Evolution. 2017; 71: 786-796
        • Losos J.B.
        • Glor R.E.
        Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geography of speciation.
        Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003; 18: 220-227
        • Wake D.B.
        Problems with species: patterns and processes of species formation in salamanders.
        Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2006; 93: 8-23
        • Winkler I.
        • et al.
        Anatomy of a neotropical insect radiation.
        BMC Evol. Biol. 2018; 18: 30
        • Les D.H.
        • et al.
        Through thick and thin: cryptic sympatric speciation in the submersed genus Najas (Hydrocharitaceae).
        Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2015; 82: 15-30
        • Barnard A.A.
        • et al.
        Mechanical and tactile incompatibilities cause reproductive isolation between two young damselfly species.
        Evolution. 2017; 71: 2410-2427
        • Siepielski A.M.
        • et al.
        Experimental evidence for neutral community dynamics governing an insect assemblage.
        Ecology. 2010; 91: 847-857
        • Siepielski A.M.
        • McPeek M.A.
        On the evidence for species coexistence: a critique of the coexistence program.
        Ecology. 2010; 91: 3153-3164
        • terHorst C.P.
        • et al.
        When can competition for resources lead to ecological equivalence?.
        Evol. Ecol. Res. 2010; 12: 843-854
        • Ruokolainen L.
        • Hanski I.
        Stable coexistence of ecologically identical species: conspecific aggregation via reproductive interference.
        J. Anim. Ecol. 2016; 85: 638-647
        • Kobayashi K.
        Sexual selection sustains biodiversity via producing negative density-dependent population growth.
        J. Ecol. 2018; (Published online November 13, 2018)https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13088
        • Seehausen O.
        Conservation: losing biodiversity by reverse speciation.
        Curr. Biol. 2006; 16: R334-R337
        • Dynesius M.
        • Jansson R.
        Persistence of within-species lineages: a neglected control of speciation rates.
        Evolution. 2014; 68: 923-934
        • Gause G.F.
        Experimental studies on the struggle for existence: I. Mixed population of two species of yeast.
        J. Exp. Biol. 1932; 9: 389-402
        • Brown W.L.
        • Wilson E.O.
        Character displacement.
        Syst. Zool. 1956; 5: 49-64
        • Germain R.M.
        • et al.
        Moving character displacement beyond characters using contemporary coexistence theory.
        Trends Ecol. Evol. 2018; 33: 74-84
        • Leibold M.A.
        • Chase J.M.
        Metacommunity Ecology (MPB-59).
        Princeton University Press, 2017
        • Vellend M.
        The Theory of Ecological Communities (MPB-57).
        Princeton University Press, 2016
        • McPeek M.A.
        Evolutionary Community Ecology (MPB-58).
        Princeton University Press, 2017
        • Fukami T.
        Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects.
        Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2015; 46: 1-23
        • Shorrocks B.
        • et al.
        Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource.
        J. Anim. Ecol. 1979; 48: 899-908
        • Shorrocks B.
        Coexistence in a patchy environment.
        in: Shorrocks B. Swingland I.R. Living in a Patchy Environment. Oxford University Press, 1990: 91-106
        • Chesson P.
        Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity.
        Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2000; 31: 343-366
        • Adler P.B.
        • et al.
        Coexistence of perennial plants: an embarrassment of niches.
        Ecol. Lett. 2010; 13: 1019-1029
        • Sevenster J.G.
        • van Alphen J.J.M.
        Aggregation and coexistence. II. A neotropical Drosophila community.
        J. Anim. Ecol. 1996; 65: 308-324
        • Shorrocks B.
        • Sevenster J.G.
        Explaining local species diversity.
        Proc. Biol. Sci. 1995; 260: 305-309
        • O’Connell T.
        • Bolger T.
        Intraspecific aggregation, probability niches and the diversity of soil microarthropod assemblages.
        Appl. Soil Ecol. 1998; 9: 63-67
        • Pereira P.H.C.
        • et al.
        Competitive mechanisms change with ontogeny in coral-dwelling gobies.
        Ecology. 2015; 96: 3090-3101
        • Brandt A.J.
        • et al.
        Evolutionary priority effects persist in anthropogenically created habitats, but not through nonnative plant invasion.
        New Phytol. 2017; 215: 865-876
        • Fukami T.
        • et al.
        Assembly history dictates ecosystem functioning: evidence from wood decomposer communities.
        Ecol. Lett. 2010; 13: 675-684
        • Peay K.G.
        • et al.
        Phylogenetic relatedness predicts priority effects in nectar yeast communities.
        Proc. Biol. Sci. 2012; 279: 749-758
        • Klompmaker A.A.
        • Finnegan S.
        Extreme rarity of competitive exclusion in modern and fossil marine benthic ecosystems.
        Geology. 2018; 46: 723-726
        • Shinen J.L.
        • Navarrete S.A.
        Coexistence and intertidal zonation of chthamalid barnacles along central Chile: interference competition or a lottery for space?.
        J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2010; 392: 176-187
        • Janzen D.H.
        Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests.
        Am. Nat. 1970; 104: 501-528
        • Connell J.H.
        On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees.
        in: Den Boer P.J. Gradwell G.R. Dynamics of Populations. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, 1971: 298-312
        • Thingstad T.F.
        Elements of a theory for the mechanisms controlling abundance, diversity, and biogeochemical role of lytic bacterial viruses in aquatic systems.
        Limnol. Oceanogr. 2000; 45: 1320-1328
        • Weitz J.S.
        Quantitative Viral Ecology: Dynamics of Viruses and Their Microbial Hosts (MPB-55).
        Princeton University Press, 2016
        • Bachelot B.
        • et al.
        Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity and natural enemies promote coexistence of tropical tree species.
        Ecology. 2017; 98: 712-720
        • Xue C.
        • Goldenfeld N.
        Coevolution maintains diversity in the stochastic “Kill the Winner” model.
        Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017; 119268101
        • Katz D.S.W.
        • Ibáñez I.
        Foliar damage beyond species distributions is partly explained by distance dependent interactions with natural enemies.
        Ecology. 2016; 97: 2331-2341
        • Chase J.M.
        Stochastic community assembly causes higher biodiversity in more productive environments.
        Science. 2010; 328: 1388-1391
        • Ritchie M.E.
        Scale, Heterogeneity, and the Structure and Diversity of Ecological Communities (MPB-44).
        Princeton University Press, 2009
        • Ford B.M.
        • Roberts J.D.
        Latitudinal gradients of dispersal and niche processes mediating neutral assembly of marine fish communities.
        Mar. Biol. 2018; 165: 94
        • Riegl B.M.
        • Purkis S.J.
        Coral reefs of the Gulf: adaptation to climatic extremes in the world’s hottest sea.
        in: Riegl B.M. Purkis S.J. Coral Reefs of the Gulf: Adaptation to Climatic Extremes. Springer, 2012: 1-4
        • Standish R.J.
        • et al.
        Resilience in ecology: abstraction, distraction, or where the action is?.
        Biol. Conserv. 2014; 177: 43-51
        • Hubbell S.P.
        A unified theory of biogeography and relative species abundance and its application to tropical rain forests and coral reefs.
        Coral Reefs. 1997; 16: S9-S21
        • Yachi S.
        • Loreau M.
        Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 1463-1468
        • Van Oppen M.J.H.
        • et al.
        Shifting paradigms in restoration of the world’s coral reefs.
        Glob. Change Biol. 2017; 23: 3437-3448
        • Schmidt K.A.
        • Ostfeld R.S.
        Biodiversity and the dilution effect in disease ecology.
        Ecology. 2001; 82: 609-619
        • Rosenzweig M.L.
        The four questions: what does the introduction of exotic species do to diversity?.
        Evol. Ecol. Res. 2001; 3: 361-367
        • Vucetich J.A.
        • et al.
        Evaluating whether nature’s intrinsic value is an axiom of or anathema to conservation.
        Conserv. Biol. 2015; 29: 321-332
        • Ackerly D.
        Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic signal.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009; 106: 19699-19706
        • Ciampaglio C.N.
        Measuring changes in articulate brachiopod morphology before and after the Permian mass extinction event: do developmental constraints limit morphological innovation?.
        Evol. Dev. 2004; 6: 260-274
        • Svensson E.I.
        • Connallon T.
        How frequency-dependent selection affects population fitness, maladaptation and evolutionary rescue.
        Evol. Appl. 2018; 112–113: 9
        • Hubbell S.P.
        The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (MPB-32).
        Princeton University Press, 2001
        • Chase J.M.
        • Leibold M.A.
        Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches.
        University of Chicago Press, 2003
        • Chesson P.L.
        • Warner R.R.
        Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery competitive systems.
        Am. Nat. 1981; 117: 923-943
        • Gould S.J.
        • Lewontin R.C.
        The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.
        Proc. Biol. Sci. 1979; 205: 581-598
        • Pólya G.
        Über eine Aufgabe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung betreffend die Irrfahrt im Straßennetz.
        Math. Ann. 1921; 84 (in German): 149-160
        • Tucker C.M.
        • et al.
        On the relationship between phylogenetic diversity and trait diversity.
        Ecology. 2018; 99: 1473-1479
        • Cadotte M.W.
        • et al.
        Why phylogenies do not always predict ecological differences.
        Ecol. Monogr. 2017; 87: 535-551
        • Voje K.L.
        • et al.
        Model adequacy and microevolutionary explanations for stasis in the fossil record.
        Am. Nat. 2018; 191: 509-523
        • Hardy N.B.
        • et al.
        Nonadaptive radiation: pervasive diet specialization by drift in scale insects?.
        Evolution. 2016; 70: 2421-2428
        • Gillespie R.G.
        • et al.
        Adaptive radiation.
        in: Levin S.A. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. 1st edn. Academic Press, 2001: 25-44
        • López-Estrada E.K.
        • et al.
        High extinction rates and non-adaptive radiation explains patterns of low diversity and extreme morphological disparity in North American blister beetles (Coleoptera, Meloidae).
        Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2019; 130: 156-168
        • Rabosky D.L.
        Challenges in the estimation of extinction from molecular phylogenies: a response to Beaulieu and O’Meara.
        Evolution. 2016; 70: 218-228
        • Lewitus E.
        • Morlon H.
        Detecting environment-dependent diversification from phylogenies: a simulation study and some empirical illustrations.
        Syst. Biol. 2018; 67: 576-593
        • Nosil P.
        • Flaxman S.M.
        Conditions for mutation-order speciation.
        Proc. Biol. Sci. 2011; 278: 399-407
        • Coyne J.A.
        • Orr H.A.
        Speciation.
        Sinauer, 2004
        • Danaisawadi P.
        • et al.
        A snail-eating snake recognizes prey handedness.
        Sci. Rep. 2016; 623832
        • Wei N.
        • et al.
        Functional trait divergence and trait plasticity confer polyploid advantage in heterogeneous environments.
        New Phytol. 2019; 221: 2286-2297
        • Ueshima R.
        • Asami T.
        Evolution: single-gene speciation by left–right reversal.
        Nature. 2003; 425: 679
        • Rosindell J.
        • et al.
        Protracted speciation revitalizes the neutral theory of biodiversity.
        Ecol. Lett. 2010; 13: 716-727
        • Schluter D.
        Ecology and the origin of species.
        Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001; 16: 372-380
        • Svensson E.I.
        • et al.
        A role for learning in population divergence of mate preferences.
        Evolution. 2010; 64: 3101-3113
        • Verzijden M.N.
        • Svensson E.I.
        Interspecific interactions and learning variability jointly drive geographic differences in mate preferences.
        Evolution. 2016; 70: 1896-1903
        • Svensson E.I.
        • Waller J.T.
        Ecology and sexual selection: evolution of wing pigmentation in calopterygid damselflies in relation to latitude, sexual dimorphism, and speciation.
        Am. Nat. 2013; 182: E174-E195
        • McPeek M.A.
        The ecological dynamics of clade diversification and community assembly.
        Am. Nat. 2008; 172: E270-E284
        • Pigot A.L.
        • et al.
        The shape and temporal dynamics of phylogenetic trees arising from geographic speciation.
        Syst. Biol. 2010; 59: 660-673
        • Moen D.
        • Morlon H.
        Why does diversification slow down?.
        Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014; 29: 190-197
        • Allmon W.D.
        • Sampson S.D.
        The stages of speciation: a stepwise framework for analysis of speciation in the fossil record.
        in: Allmon W.D. Yacobucci M.M. Species and Speciation in the Fossil Record. University of Chicago Press, 2016: 121-167
        • Wellenreuther M.
        • Sánchez-Guillén R.A.
        Nonadaptive radiation in damselflies.
        Evol. Appl. 2016; 9: 103-118

      Glossary

      Adaptive radiation
      (i) a pattern of species diversification in which a lineage of species occupies a diversity of ecological roles [
      • Katz D.S.W.
      • Ibáñez I.
      Foliar damage beyond species distributions is partly explained by distance dependent interactions with natural enemies.
      ]; and (ii) the evolution of ecological and phenotypic diversity within a rapidly multiplying lineage [
      • Rundell R.J.
      • Price T.D.
      Adaptive radiation, nonadaptive radiation, ecological speciation and nonecological speciation.
      ,
      • Givnish T.J.
      Adaptive radiation and molecular systematics: issues and approaches.
      ,
      • Schluter D.
      The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation.
      ].
      Beta diversity
      can be thought of as the difference between assemblages; in the context of patchy habitats it is sometimes formally defined as the ratio of gamma (regional, or landscape level) diversity to average alpha (local, or patch level) diversity. If a set, small number of species can occupy small habitat patches, increasing beta diversity among patches will necessarily increase gamma diversity.
      Coexistence
      Siepielski and McPeek [
      • Siepielski A.M.
      • McPeek M.A.
      On the evidence for species coexistence: a critique of the coexistence program.
      ] make the distinction between co-occurrence and coexistence of species, the latter of which implies some level of population stability among community members at the local scale that is stabilized by species traits and niches. This is in contrast to co-occurrence, where species’ presence in a community is largely due to chance or larger-scale processes.
      Community assembly
      the construction and maintenance of local communities through sequential, repeated immigration of species from the regional species pool. Vellend [
      • Vellend M.
      The Theory of Ecological Communities (MPB-57).
      ] usefully suggests that species membership in assemblages at various scales is driven by the processes of speciation, extirpation, migration, and ecological drift.
      Co-occurrence
      refers to species that are found together by chance or because of larger-scale processes, like source–sink dynamics. Neutral species co-occur.
      Disparification
      increase in the morphospace occupied by members of a clade through time [
      • Ackerly D.
      Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic signal.
      ,
      • Ciampaglio C.N.
      Measuring changes in articulate brachiopod morphology before and after the Permian mass extinction event: do developmental constraints limit morphological innovation?.
      ]; distinct from diversification, which we use here to mean an increase in the number of species in a clade through time. Nonadaptive radiations are expected to exhibit diversification with minimal disparification.
      Diversification
      net increase in the number of species in a clade over time. Speciation minus extinction.
      Ecological drift
      random fluctuation in species abundances in an assemblage, analogous to genetic drift of allele frequency in a population (see [
      • Vellend M.
      The Theory of Ecological Communities (MPB-57).
      ]).
      Ecological speciation
      the generation of reproductive isolation between populations as a result of ecologically based divergent selection between environments, which can include both natural and sexual selection [
      • Price T.D.
      Speciation in Birds.
      ,
      • Nosil P.
      Ecological Speciation.
      ].
      Janzen–Connell–Thingstad dynamics
      a family of negative density-dependent selection (NDDS) or negative frequency-dependent selection (NFDS) processes that are very similar, although Janzen–Connell is typically invoked by tropical forest biologists, whereas Thingstad’s ‘Kill-the-Winner’ hypothesis is much more frequently cited in the marine phage literature [
      • Thingstad T.F.
      Elements of a theory for the mechanisms controlling abundance, diversity, and biogeochemical role of lytic bacterial viruses in aquatic systems.
      ,
      • Weitz J.S.
      Quantitative Viral Ecology: Dynamics of Viruses and Their Microbial Hosts (MPB-55).
      ].
      Natural selection
      differential survival and/or reproduction of classes of entities (alleles, genotypes, subsets of genotypes, populations, species) that differ in one or more characteristics.
      Negative density-dependent selection (NDDS)
      sometimes referred to as ‘inverse’ density-dependent selection; selection that favors rare phenotypes. Although technically distinct, NFDS has similar effects on community-level dynamics, as frequency is often related to density. One way that NDDS and NFDS dynamics can arise is through species-specific pathogens, which will tend to lead to some variation of Janzen–Connell–Thingstad dynamics. Another possible way that NDDS or NFDS can occur is through sexual conflict [
      • Kobayashi K.
      Sexual selection sustains biodiversity via producing negative density-dependent population growth.
      ,
      • Svensson E.I.
      • Connallon T.
      How frequency-dependent selection affects population fitness, maladaptation and evolutionary rescue.
      ]. Throughout this Opinion article, we refer to population dynamics among (not within) species; that is, our discussion focuses on species richness rather than intraspecific genetic diversity.
      Neutral species
      species that are ecologically nearly identical to one another and that follow the neutral dynamics of a random walk in relative frequency as described by Hubbell [
      • Hubbell S.P.
      The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (MPB-32).
      ]; one of the four types of species in a community identified by McPeek [
      • McPeek M.A.
      Evolutionary Community Ecology (MPB-58).
      ] based on their population dynamical properties.
      Niche
      the environmental conditions that allow a species to satisfy its minimum requirements so that the birth rate of a local population is equal to or greater than its death rate, along with the set of per capita effects of that species on these environmental conditions [
      • Fukami T.
      Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects.
      ,
      • Chase J.M.
      • Leibold M.A.
      Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches.
      ].
      Niche conservatism
      a pattern where closely related species are more ecologically similar to one another than would be expected based on their phylogenetic relationships. Niche conservatism is not expected in an adaptive radiation.
      Nonadaptive radiation
      lineage diversification with minimal ecological diversification, often (but not always) resulting in allopatric or parapatric taxa. ‘Minimal’ refers to slight differences among species that can accumulate in allopatry; for example, due to neutral evolution or slight differences in environments [
      • Warren D.L.
      • et al.
      Mistaking geography for biology: inferring processes from species distributions.
      ] (Box 1).
      Nonecological speciation
      the generation of reproductive isolation between populations that does not arise from divergent natural selection [
      • Nosil P.
      Ecological Speciation.
      ]. One potential mechanism by which nonecological speciation can occur involves the slow process of fixation of different and selectively favored mutations among allopatric populations.
      Priority effects
      a pattern whereby the outcome of competition for a resource is highly influenced by the (often stochastic) order of arrival. For example, some types of wood-rot fungi will be able to exclude competitors only if they are established first [
      • Fukami T.
      Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects.
      ,
      • Fukami T.
      • et al.
      Assembly history dictates ecosystem functioning: evidence from wood decomposer communities.
      ]. A related mathematical model of stochastic community assembly is the ‘Lottery Hypothesis’ [
      • Pereira P.H.C.
      • et al.
      Competitive mechanisms change with ontogeny in coral-dwelling gobies.
      ,
      • Chesson P.L.
      • Warner R.R.
      Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery competitive systems.
      ].
      Probability refuge
      a metaphorical ‘refuge’ concept that Shorrocks and others [
      • Ruokolainen L.
      • Hanski I.
      Stable coexistence of ecologically identical species: conspecific aggregation via reproductive interference.
      ,
      • Shorrocks B.
      • et al.
      Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource.
      ,
      • Shorrocks B.
      Coexistence in a patchy environment.
      ,
      • Sevenster J.G.
      • van Alphen J.J.M.
      Aggregation and coexistence. II. A neotropical Drosophila community.
      ] invoke in the aggregation model to describe the niche space that opens for ecologically similar species when intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition (e.g., due to aggregated egg laying and sibling competition in ephemeral patchy resources).
      Sexual selection
      selection on traits resulting from differential mating success, including access to different numbers of mates or to mates of differing quality [
      • Price T.D.
      Speciation in Birds.
      ] (Box 3).
      Sink species
      species that are present only due to continual migration from other communities; one of the four types of species in a community identified by McPeek [
      • McPeek M.A.
      Evolutionary Community Ecology (MPB-58).
      ] based on its population dynamical properties.
      Source–sink dynamics
      movement of individuals between high-quality (source) and lower-quality (sink) patches within a metacommunity, where populations in the sink are sustained only through migration.
      Walking-dead species
      species that are slowly being driven extinct by the ecological conditions that they experience within the community − immigration will not rescue them; one of the four types of species in a community identified by McPeek [
      • McPeek M.A.
      Evolutionary Community Ecology (MPB-58).
      ] based on its population dynamical properties.
      View full text