Advertisement
Opinion| Volume 29, ISSUE 1, P28-40, January 2021

Download started.

Ok

Conserved DNA Methyltransferases: A Window into Fundamental Mechanisms of Epigenetic Regulation in Bacteria

Published:May 13, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2020.04.007

      Highlights

      • DNA methylation is the epigenetic mark most commonly found throughout the living world. In bacteria, it is responsible for a variety of functional roles, including defense against foreign DNA, regulation of chromosome replication and segregation, mismatch repair, and control of virulence gene expression, among others.
      • DNA methyltransferases (MTases) are responsible for transferring a methyl group from an S-adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet) donor to DNA. Dam, Dcm, and CcrM are examples of bacterial DNA MTases that have been comprehensively characterized for their roles in gene regulation.
      • Here, we summarized the landscape of DNA MTase conservation in bacteria and observed that MTase conservation is more common than previously portrayed, spanning several phylogenetic levels, and being present in multiple human and animal pathogens. Information on the functional relevance of these MTases is virtually inexistent, but they are expected to play key functional roles.
      • We also discuss why and how these MTases can be prioritized to enable a community-wide, integrative approach for functional epigenomic studies. Ultimately, we discuss how some highly conserved DNA MTases may emerge as promising targets for the development of novel epigenetic inhibitors for biomedical applications.
      An increasing number of studies have reported that bacterial DNA methylation has important functions beyond the roles in restriction-modification systems, including the ability of affecting clinically relevant phenotypes such as virulence, host colonization, sporulation, biofilm formation, among others. Although insightful, such studies have a largely ad hoc nature and would benefit from a systematic strategy enabling a joint functional characterization of bacterial methylomes by the microbiology community. In this opinion article, we propose that highly conserved DNA methyltransferases (MTases) represent a unique opportunity for bacterial epigenomic studies. These MTases are rather common in bacteria, span various taxonomic scales, and are present in multiple human pathogens. Apart from well-characterized core DNA MTases, like those from Vibrio cholerae, Salmonella enterica, Clostridioides difficile, or Streptococcus pyogenes, multiple highly conserved DNA MTases are also found in numerous human pathogens, including those belonging to the genera Burkholderia and Acinetobacter. We discuss why and how these MTases can be prioritized to enable a community-wide, integrative approach for functional epigenomic studies. Ultimately, we discuss how some highly conserved DNA MTases may emerge as promising targets for the development of novel epigenetic inhibitors for biomedical applications.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      Read-It-Now

      Purchase access to all full-text HTML articles for 6 or 36 hr at a low cost. Click here to explore this opportunity.

      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Trends in Microbiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Thomas C.M.
        • Nielsen K.M.
        Mechanisms of, and barriers to, horizontal gene transfer between bacteria.
        Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005; 3: 711-721
        • Labrie S.J.
        • et al.
        Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms.
        Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010; 8: 317-327
        • Mruk I.
        • Kobayashi I.
        To be or not to be: regulation of restriction-modification systems and other toxin-antitoxin systems.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42: 70-86
        • Murphy J.
        • et al.
        Bacteriophage orphan DNA methyltransferases: insights from their bacterial origin, function, and occurrence.
        Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013; 79: 7547-7555
        • Rocha E.P.
        • et al.
        Evolutionary role of restriction/modification systems as revealed by comparative genome analysis.
        Genome Res. 2001; 11: 946-958
        • Pingoud A.
        • et al.
        Type II restriction endonucleases: structure and mechanism.
        Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005; 62: 685-707
        • Kobayashi I.
        Behavior of restriction-modification systems as selfish mobile elements and their impact on genome evolution.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29: 3742-3756
        • Beaulaurier J.
        • et al.
        Deciphering bacterial epigenomes using modern sequencing technologies.
        Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019; 20: 157-172
        • Flusberg B.A.
        • et al.
        Direct detection of DNA methylation during single-molecule, real-time sequencing.
        Nat. Methods. 2010; 7: 461-465
        • Blow M.J.
        • et al.
        The epigenomic landscape of prokaryotes.
        PLoS Genet. 2016; 12e1005854
        • Fang G.
        • et al.
        Genome-wide mapping of methylated adenine residues in pathogenic Escherichia coli using single-molecule real-time sequencing.
        Nat. Biotechnol. 2012; 30: 1232-1239
        • Oliveira P.H.
        • et al.
        Epigenomic characterization of Clostridioides difficile finds a conserved DNA methyltransferase that mediates sporulation and pathogenesis.
        Nat. Microbiol. 2020; 5: 166-180
        • Kumar S.
        • et al.
        N4-cytosine DNA methylation regulates transcription and pathogenesis in Helicobacter pylori.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46: 3429-3445
        • Nye T.M.
        • et al.
        DNA methylation from a type I restriction modification system influences gene expression and virulence in Streptococcus pyogenes.
        PLoS Pathog. 2019; 15e1007841
        • Cohen N.R.
        • et al.
        A role for the bacterial GATC methylome in antibiotic stress survival.
        Nat. Genet. 2016; 48: 581-586
        • Kahramanoglou C.
        • et al.
        Genomics of DNA cytosine methylation in Escherichia coli reveals its role in stationary phase transcription.
        Nat. Commun. 2012; 3: 886
        • Kwiatek A.
        • et al.
        Type III methyltransferase M.NgoAX from Neisseria gonorrhoeae FA1090 regulates biofilm formation and interactions with human cells.
        Front. Microbiol. 2015; 6: 1426
        • Stephenson S.A.
        • Brown P.D.
        Epigenetic influence of Dam methylation on gene expression and attachment in uropathogenic Escherichia coli.
        Front. Public Health. 2016; 4: 131
        • Payelleville A.
        • et al.
        DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam) overexpression impairs Photorhabdus luminescens motility and virulence.
        Front. Microbiol. 2017; 8: 1671
        • Oliveira P.H.
        • et al.
        The interplay of restriction-modification systems with mobile genetic elements and their prokaryotic hosts.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42: 10618-10631
        • Mouammine A.
        • Collier J.
        The impact of DNA methylation in alphaproteobacteria.
        Mol. Microbiol. 2018; 110: 1-10
        • Payelleville A.
        • et al.
        The complete methylome of an entomopathogenic bacterium reveals the existence of loci with unmethylated adenines.
        Sci. Rep. 2018; 8: 12091
        • Christen B.
        • et al.
        The essential genome of a bacterium.
        Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011; 7: 528
        • Julio S.M.
        • et al.
        DNA adenine methylase is essential for viability and plays a role in the pathogenesis of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Vibrio cholerae.
        Infect. Immun. 2001; 69: 7610-7615
        • Stephens C.
        • et al.
        A cell cycle-regulated bacterial DNA methyltransferase is essential for viability.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996; 93: 1210-1214
        • Gonzalez D.
        • et al.
        The functions of DNA methylation by CcrM in Caulobacter crescentus: a global approach.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42: 3720-3735
        • Estibariz I.
        • et al.
        The core genome m5C methyltransferase JHP1050 (M.Hpy99III) plays an important role in orchestrating gene expression in Helicobacter pylori.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47: 2336-2348
        • Gartner K.
        • et al.
        Cytosine N4-methylation via M.Ssp6803II is involved in the regulation of transcription, fine-tuning of DNA replication and DNA repair in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.
        Front. Microbiol. 2019; 10: 1233
        • Hagemann M.
        • et al.
        Identification of the DNA methyltransferases establishing the methylome of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.
        DNA Res. 2018; 25: 343-352
        • Kita K.
        • et al.
        Evidence of horizontal transfer of the EcoO109I restriction-modification gene to Escherichia coli chromosomal DNA.
        J. Bacteriol. 1999; 181: 6822-6827
        • Kobayashi I.
        • et al.
        Shaping the genome--restriction-modification systems as mobile genetic elements.
        Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1999; 9: 649-656
        • Lauster R.
        Evolution of type II DNA methyltransferases. A gene duplication model.
        J. Mol. Biol. 1989; 206: 313-321
        • Jeltsch A.
        • Pingoud A.
        Horizontal gene transfer contributes to the wide distribution and evolution of type II restriction-modification systems.
        J. Mol. Evol. 1996; 42: 91-96
        • Seshasayee A.S.
        • et al.
        Context-dependent conservation of DNA methyltransferases in bacteria.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40: 7066-7073
        • Sberro H.
        • et al.
        Large-scale analyses of human microbiomes reveal thousands of small, novel genes.
        Cell. 2019; 178: 1245-1259
        • Weyler L.
        • et al.
        Restriction endonucleases from invasive Neisseria gonorrhoeae cause double-strand breaks and distort mitosis in epithelial cells during infection.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9e114208
        • Roberts R.J.
        • et al.
        REBASE -- a database for DNA restriction and modification: enzymes, genes and genomes.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43: D298-D299
        • Sanchez-Romero M.A.
        • Casadesus J.
        The bacterial epigenome.
        Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020; 18: 7-20
        • Putnam C.D.
        Evolution of the methyl directed mismatch repair system in Escherichia coli.
        DNA Repair. 2016; 38: 32-41
        • Kunkel T.A.
        • Erie D.A.
        DNA mismatch repair.
        Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2005; 74: 681-710
        • Roberts D.
        • et al.
        IS10 transposition is regulated by DNA adenine methylation.
        Cell. 1985; 43: 117-130
        • Camacho E.M.
        • Casadesus J.
        Regulation of traJ transcription in the Salmonella virulence plasmid by strand-specific DNA adenine hemimethylation.
        Mol. Microbiol. 2005; 57: 1700-1718
        • Slater S.
        • et al.
        E. coli SeqA protein binds oriC in two different methyl-modulated reactions appropriate to its roles in DNA replication initiation and origin sequestration.
        Cell. 1995; 82: 927-936
        • Beauchamp J.M.
        • et al.
        Methylation-dependent DNA discrimination in natural transformation of Campylobacter jejuni.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017; 114: E8053-E8061
        • Jeltsch A.
        Maintenance of species identity and controlling speciation of bacteria: a new function for restriction/modification systems?.
        Gene. 2003; 317: 13-16
        • Oliveira P.H.
        • et al.
        Regulation of genetic flux between bacteria by restriction-modification systems.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016; 113: 5658-5663
        • Budroni S.
        • et al.
        Neisseria meningitidis is structured in clades associated with restriction modification systems that modulate homologous recombination.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011; 108: 4494-4499
        • Croucher N.J.
        • et al.
        Diversification of bacterial genome content through distinct mechanisms over different timescales.
        Nat. Commun. 2014; 5: 5471
        • Nandi T.
        • et al.
        Burkholderia pseudomallei sequencing identifies genomic clades with distinct recombination, accessory, and epigenetic profiles.
        Genome Res. 2015; 25: 129-141
        • Forde B.M.
        • et al.
        Lineage-specific methyltransferases define the methylome of the globally disseminated Escherichia coli ST131 clone.
        MBio. 2015; 6e01602-15
        • Roberts G.A.
        • et al.
        Impact of target site distribution for Type I restriction enzymes on the evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) populations.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41: 7472-7484
        • Maddamsetti R.
        • et al.
        Core genes evolve rapidly in the long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli.
        Genome Biol. Evol. 2017; 9: 1072-1083
        • Oliveira P.H.
        • et al.
        The chromosomal organization of horizontal gene transfer in bacteria.
        Nat. Commun. 2017; 8: 841
        • Chao M.C.
        • et al.
        The design and analysis of transposon insertion sequencing experiments.
        Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016; 14: 119-128
        • van Opijnen T.
        • et al.
        Tn-seq: high-throughput parallel sequencing for fitness and genetic interaction studies in microorganisms.
        Nat. Methods. 2009; 6: 767-772
        • Goodman A.L.
        • et al.
        Identifying genetic determinants needed to establish a human gut symbiont in its habitat.
        Cell Host Microbe. 2009; 6: 279-289
        • Gawronski J.D.
        • et al.
        Tracking insertion mutants within libraries by deep sequencing and a genome-wide screen for Haemophilus genes required in the lung.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009; 106: 16422-16427
        • Langridge G.C.
        • et al.
        Simultaneous assay of every Salmonella typhi gene using one million transposon mutants.
        Genome Res. 2009; 19: 2308-2316
        • Chao M.C.
        • et al.
        A cytosine methytransferase modulates the cell envelope stress response in the Cholera pathogen.
        PLoS Genet. 2015; 11e1005739
        • Sternon J.F.
        • et al.
        Transposon sequencing of Brucella abortus uncovers essential genes for growth in vitro and inside macrophages.
        Infect. Immun. 2018; 86e00312-18
        • Phan M.D.
        • et al.
        The serum resistome of a globally disseminated multidrug resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli clone.
        PLoS Genet. 2013; 9e1003834
        • Dembek M.
        • et al.
        High-throughput analysis of gene essentiality and sporulation in Clostridium difficile.
        MBio. 2015; 6e02383
        • Jiao Y.
        • et al.
        A systems-level integrative framework for genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression data identifies differential gene expression modules under epigenetic control.
        Bioinformatics. 2014; 30: 2360-2366
        • Hernandez-Ferrer C.
        • et al.
        MultiDataSet: an R package for encapsulating multiple data sets with application to omic data integration.
        BMC Bioinformatics. 2017; 18: 36
        • Louhimo R.
        • Hautaniemi S.
        CNAmet: an R package for integrating copy number, methylation and expression data.
        Bioinformatics. 2011; 27: 887-888
        • Wang M.
        • et al.
        Efficient test and visualization of multi-set intersections.
        Sci. Rep. 2015; 5: 16923
        • van der Woude M.
        • et al.
        Epigenetic phase variation of the pap operon in Escherichia coli.
        Trends Microbiol. 1996; 4: 5-9
        • Wallecha A.
        • et al.
        Dam- and OxyR-dependent phase variation of agn43: essential elements and evidence for a new role of DNA methylation.
        J. Bacteriol. 2002; 184: 3338-3347
        • Lim H.N.
        • van Oudenaarden A.
        A multistep epigenetic switch enables the stable inheritance of DNA methylation states.
        Nat. Genet. 2007; 39: 269-275
        • Erill I.
        • et al.
        Comparative analysis of Ralstonia solanacearum methylomes.
        Front. Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 504
        • Mirauta B.
        • et al.
        Parseq: reconstruction of microbial transcription landscape from RNA-seq read counts using state-space models.
        Bioinformatics. 2014; 30: 1409-1416
        • Jorjani H.
        • Zavolan M.
        TSSer: an automated method to identify transcription start sites in prokaryotic genomes from differential RNA sequencing data.
        Bioinformatics. 2014; 30: 971-974
        • Solomon M.J.
        • et al.
        Mapping protein-DNA interactions in vivo with formaldehyde: evidence that histone H4 is retained on a highly transcribed gene.
        Cell. 1988; 53: 937-947
        • Mikkelsen T.S.
        • et al.
        Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells.
        Nature. 2007; 448: 553-560
        • Gama-Castro S.
        • et al.
        RegulonDB version 9.0: high-level integration of gene regulation, coexpression, motif clustering and beyond.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44: D133-D143
        • Ishihama A.
        • et al.
        Transcription profile of Escherichia coli: genomic SELEX search for regulatory targets of transcription factors.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44: 2058-2074
        • Sierro N.
        • et al.
        DBTBS: a database of transcriptional regulation in Bacillus subtilis containing upstream intergenic conservation information.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36: D93-D96
        • Minch K.J.
        • et al.
        The DNA-binding network of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
        Nat. Commun. 2015; 6: 5829
        • Casadesus J.
        • Low D.A.
        Programmed heterogeneity: epigenetic mechanisms in bacteria.
        J. Biol. Chem. 2013; 288: 13929-13935
        • De Ste Croix M.
        • et al.
        Phase-variable methylation and epigenetic regulation by type I restriction-modification systems.
        FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017; 41: S3-S15
        • Atack J.M.
        • et al.
        Phasevarions of bacterial pathogens: methylomics sheds new light on old enemies.
        Trends Microbiol. 2018; 26: 715-726
        • Phillips Z.N.
        • et al.
        Phasevarions of bacterial pathogens - phase-variable epigenetic regulators evolving from restriction-modification systems.
        Microbiology. 2019; 165: 917-928
        • Atack J.M.
        • et al.
        A survey of type III restriction-modification systems reveals numerous, novel epigenetic regulators controlling phase-variable regulons; phasevarions.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46: 3532-3542
        • Atack J.M.
        • et al.
        DNA sequence repeats identify numerous type I restriction-modification systems that are potential epigenetic regulators controlling phase-variable regulons; phasevarions.
        FASEB J. 2020; 34: 1038-1051
        • Polaczek P.
        • et al.
        GATC motifs may alter the conformation of DNA depending on sequence context and N6-adenine methylation status: possible implications for DNA-protein recognition.
        Mol. Gen. Genet. 1998; 258: 488-493
        • Ngo T.T.
        • et al.
        Effects of cytosine modifications on DNA flexibility and nucleosome mechanical stability.
        Nat. Commun. 2016; 7: 10813
        • Diekmann S.
        DNA methylation can enhance or induce DNA curvature.
        EMBO J. 1987; 6: 4213-4217
        • Moller A.
        • et al.
        7-Methylguanine in poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC) facilitates z-DNA formation.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1981; 78: 4777-4781
        • Hognon C.
        • et al.
        Cooperative effects of cytosine methylation on DNA structure and dynamics.
        J. Phys. Chem. B. 2019; 123: 7365-7371
        • Lee D.S.
        • et al.
        Simultaneous profiling of 3D genome structure and DNA methylation in single human cells.
        Nat. Methods. 2019; 16: 999-1006
        • Garcia-Del Portillo F.
        • et al.
        DNA adenine methylase mutants of Salmonella typhimurium show defects in protein secretion, cell invasion, and M cell cytotoxicity.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 11578-11583
        • Pucciarelli M.G.
        • et al.
        Envelope instability in DNA adenine methylase mutants of Salmonella enterica.
        Microbiology. 2002; 148: 1171-1182
        • Heithoff D.M.
        • et al.
        An essential role for DNA adenine methylation in bacterial virulence.
        Science. 1999; 284: 967-970
        • Watson Jr., M.E.
        • et al.
        Inactivation of deoxyadenosine methyltransferase (dam) attenuates Haemophilus influenzae virulence.
        Mol. Microbiol. 2004; 53: 651-664
        • Robinson V.L.
        • et al.
        A dam mutant of Yersinia pestis is attenuated and induces protection against plague.
        FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005; 252: 251-256
        • Luo N.
        • et al.
        DNA methyltransferase inhibition upregulates MHC-I to potentiate cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses in breast cancer.
        Nat. Commun. 2018; 9: 248
        • Stresemann C.
        • et al.
        Functional diversity of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in human cancer cell lines.
        Cancer Res. 2006; 66: 2794-2800
        • Brueckner B.
        • Lyko F.
        DNA methyltransferase inhibitors: old and new drugs for an epigenetic cancer therapy.
        Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2004; 25: 551-554
        • Kahng L.S.
        • Shapiro L.
        The CcrM DNA methyltransferase of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is essential, and its activity is cell cycle regulated.
        J. Bacteriol. 2001; 183: 3065-3075
        • Robertson G.T.
        • et al.
        The Brucella abortus CcrM DNA methyltransferase is essential for viability, and its overexpression attenuates intracellular replication in murine macrophages.
        J. Bacteriol. 2000; 182: 3482-3489
        • Roberts R.J.
        • et al.
        A nomenclature for restriction enzymes, DNA methyltransferases, homing endonucleases and their genes.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31: 1805-1812
        • Rao D.N.
        • et al.
        Type III restriction-modification enzymes: a historical perspective.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42: 45-55
        • Murray N.E.
        Type I restriction systems: sophisticated molecular machines (a legacy of Bertani and Weigle).
        Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000; 64: 412-434

      Glossary

      DNA methyltransferase
      family of enzymes that catalyze the transfer of a methyl group from an S-adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet) donor to DNA.
      Epigenome
      complete record of all chemical modifications to DNA. Together with the epitranscriptome (chemical modifications of RNA) and epiproteome (chemical modifications of proteins), makes up the epi-ome.
      Methylome
      complete record of all methyl modifications to either DNA, RNA, or proteins in a particular cell or organism.
      Restriction-modification (R-M) systems
      almost ubiquitous in prokaryotes, these systems consist of a DNA methyltransferase that methylates a specific target sequence in the host genome and a cognate restriction endonuclease that cleaves unmethylated or inappropriately methylated targets from exogenous DNA. They are thus typically regarded as innate defense systems and, depending on type, as molecular parasites.
      Single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing
      third generation long-read sequencing-by-synthesis technology, based on the real-time imaging of fluorescently tagged nucleotides as they are synthesized along individual DNA template molecules. The duration between consecutive pulses of light directly reflects the DNA polymerase kinetics, including the impact caused by DNA modification events.
      View full text