Highlights
- •
This study describes simple sample loading into the dirRT-qPCR reaction mixture for point-of-care on-site detection.
- •
The assay provides one-step direct detection without sample pretreatment and complicated procedures.
- •
The dirRT-qPCR has high sensitivity and specificity for clinical Zika virus diagnosis in multiple types of clinical sample.
Abstract
Objective
The nucleic acid-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay is commonly applied to detect infection with Zika virus (ZIKV). However, the time- and labor-intensive sample pretreatment required to remove inhibitors that cause false-negative results in clinical samples is impractical for use in resource-limited areas. The aim was to develop a direct reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (dirRT-qPCR) assay for ZIKV diagnosis directly from clinical samples.
Methods
The combination of inhibitor-tolerant polymerases, polymerase enhancers, and dirRT-qPCR conditions was optimized for various clinical samples including blood and serum. Sensitivity was evaluated with standard DNA spiked in simulated samples. Specificity was evaluated using clinical specimens of other infections such as dengue virus and chikungunya virus.
Results
High specificity and sensitivity were achieved, and the limit of detection (LOD) of the assay was 9.5 × 101 ZIKV RNA copies/reaction. The on-site clinical diagnosis of ZIKV required a 5 μl sample and the diagnosis could be completed within 2 h.
Conclusions
This robust dirRT-qPCR assay shows a high potential for point-of-care diagnosis, and the primer–probe combinations can also be extended for other viral detection. It realizes the goal of large-scale on-site screening for viral infections and could be used for early diagnosis and the prevention and control of viral outbreaks.
Keywords
Introduction
Zika virus (ZIKV), a mosquito-borne Flavivirus, is a positive single-stranded RNA virus with a nucleic acid length of about 10.7 kb. This virus has been spreading rapidly and there have been large-scale outbreaks worldwide in recent years (
Haddow et al., 2012
,
Harris et al., 2006
,
Calvet et al., 2016
,
Dick et al., 1952
). ZIKV has drawn attention as it may cause severe symptoms while no specific medical treatment or vaccine is currently available (
Campos et al., 2015
,
Hancock et al., 2014
,
Brasil et al., 2016
,
Cao-Lormeau et al., 2016
). Rapid diagnosis is the only option to monitor and control the spread of ZIKV, and nucleic acid-based diagnostic assays, i.e. polymerase chain reaction (PCR), have shown high efficiency due to their sensitivity and specificity (
Bonaldo et al., 2016
,
Huzly et al., 2016
,
Wang et al., 2016
,
Zanluca et al., 2015
). However, clinical samples contain innate constituents that are regarded as PCR inhibitors, which inactivate DNA polymerases or degrade target nucleic acids or primers, such as immunoglobulin G and hemoglobin in blood, and these have resulted in false-negative results in tests on these samples (
Schrader et al., 2012
,
Al-Soud et al., 2000
,
Abu Al-Soud and Radstrom, 2001
,
Wang et al., 1992
,
Khan et al., 1991
,
Abu Al-Soud and Radstrom, 2000
,
Abu Al-Soud and Radstrom, 1998
). The required purification of the nucleic acid from infected specimens prior to detection is not only time- and labor-intensive, but also increases the risk of human error and accidental exposure (
Abu Al-Soud and Radstrom, 2001
). The incomplete removal of qPCR inhibitors during nucleic acid extraction could still lead to inaccurate detection. In this context, the detection of target nucleic acid directly from samples without purification is desirable.
The direct reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (dirRT-qPCR) amplification method simplifies the operating process, reduces the time from sample-to-answer detection, reduces the risk of exposure to infectious substances, and reduces the sample volume required from the milliliter level to as low as the sub-microliter level (
Kang et al., 2015
). These advantages support dirRT-qPCR as a practical point-of-care diagnostic method for on-site disease screening. Several methods for sample pretreatment such as preheating and freezing–thawing have been reported for direct sample detection without purification (
- Kang K.
- Yang K.
- Zhong J.
- Tian Y.
- Zhang L.
- Zhai J.
- Zhang L.
- Song C.
- Gou C.Y.
- Luo J.
A direct real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid high-throughput detection of highly pathogenic North American porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in China without RNA purification.
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2015; 5: 45
Watkins-Riedel et al., 2004
;
Jadaon et al., 2009
;
Panaccio et al., 1993
;
Victor et al., 2009
). The use of various PCR enhancers such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), non-ionic detergents, bovine serum albumin (BSA), and PCR enhancer cocktail has also been reported in direct PCR detection (
Zhang et al., 2010
;
Watkins-Riedel et al., 2004
,
Nishimura et al., 2000
,
Yang et al., 2007
,
Bu et al., 2008
). Yet, the fragility of RNA and the existence of high levels of RNases, which can cause RNA degradation and compromise RNA integrity, are the challenge in direct RNA detection from clinical samples (
Dongyang et al., 2018
).
We have therefore developed a dirRT-qPCR assay to detect ZIKV directly from multiple crude clinical samples, including saliva, serum, throat swab, whole blood, and urine, without the need for any sample pretreatment. With the optimized combination of Taq DNA polymerase variant, PCR and enzyme stabilizers, this dirRT-qPCR assay was found to have high sensitivity and high specificity for ZIKV detection in the presence of other interference substances and other arbovirus infections, such as dengue virus (DENV) and chikungunya virus (CHIKV). Since this robust assay can be completed in 2 h with as little as 5 μl of sample, dirRT-qPCR reaction mixture, and a thermocycler only, and the primer–probe combination can be extended for the detection of other viruses, it has a high potential for application in rapid on-site screening, such as at entry–exit ports and hospitals. This assay realizes the goal of large-scale preliminary screening for viral infections and could be used for early diagnosis and the prevention and control of viral outbreaks.
Materials and methods
Collection and processing of clinical samples
Nine clinical samples of ZIKV infection, i.e. three saliva, two serum, one throat swab, two urine, and one whole blood, were provided by Zhejiang Inspection and Quarantine Bureau. Information on the patients infected with ZIKV is summarized in Table 1. All normal clinical specimens, 54 DENV-positive samples, and eight CHIKV-positive samples were obtained from the Health Quarantine Laboratory of Shenzhen International Travel Health Care Center and were collected according to the standard clinical sample collection protocol, with ethical approval and written consent. Clinical whole blood samples and the throat swabs were additionally treated with dipotassium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA-K2) anticoagulation and Minimal Essential Medium Eagles with Earle's Balanced Saltsa (MEM/EBSS) medium, respectively.
Table 1Basic information for the clinical samples collected from the Zika virus-infected patients.
Patient | Sex | Age (years) | Symptoms | Types of samples collected |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Male | 38 | Conjunctivitis, fever, skin rash | Serum, saliva |
2 | Male | 8 | Conjunctivitis, fever, skin rash | Serum, saliva, urine |
3 | Female | 42 | Conjunctivitis, fever, skin rash | Saliva, throat swab, whole blood, urine |
ZIKV lentivirus, ZIKV RNA, bacterial genomic DNA, arbovirus and bacterial plasmids, and influenza RNA
The ZIKV lentivirus at a stock concentration of 2 × 108 Transducing Units/mL TU/ml was obtained from Hanbio Biotechnology Co., Ltd.. Extracted ZIKV RNA and one yellow fever virus (YFV) in cell culture supernatant were provided courtesy of the Health Quarantine Laboratory of Guangdong Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center; the concentration was approximately 1.9 × 1010 copies/μl. Influenza RNA was obtained from the Health Quarantine Laboratory of Shenzhen International Travel Health Care Center. Three types of bacterial genomic DNA were provided by Shenzhen Disease Prevention and Control Center (SZCDC). Five types of arbovirus plasmid and bacterial plasmid were synthesized by Sangon. Information on these nucleic acids is show in Table 2. To evaluate the specificity of this assay, five different arbovirus plasmids, eight different bacterial plasmids, and three types of influenza virus (H1N1, H3N1, and B) were used. Meanwhile, these arbovirus plasmids were added to the reaction together with RNA to further identify the specificity of the RT-qPCR assay. Specifically, 5 μl of these plasmids (105 copies/μl) were respectively added last to the reaction mixture or 2 μl of plasmid (105 copies/μl) and 3 μl ZIKV RNA (105 copies/μl) were added together to the reaction mixture.
Table 2Information on influenza virus RNA, viral plasmids, bacterial plasmids, and genomic DNA used in this study.
Name | Accession number | Genome region |
Type | Name | Accession number | Genome region |
Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DENV | M29095.1 | 3′-UTR | Plasmid | Bacillus anthracis | AF205319.1 | rpoB | Plasmid |
CHIKV | KC488650.1 | E1 | Plasmid | Brucella | JX081250.1 | IS711 | Plasmid |
YFV | FJ654700.1 | E | Plasmid | Burkholderia mallei | AM087433.1 | Flip | Plasmid |
WNV | AY646354.1 | E | Plasmid | Burkholderia pseudomallei | AF074878.2 | TTS | Plasmid |
JEV | L47349.1 | E | plasmid | Francisella tularensis | M32059.1 | Tul4 | plasmid |
H1N1 | - | - | RNA | Salmonella | - | - | Genomic DNA |
H3N1 | - | - | RNA | Typhoid bacillus Salmonella typhi | - | - | Genomic DNA |
B | - | - | RNA | Shellogell Shigella | - | - | Genomic DNA |
DENV, dengue virus; CHIKV, chikungunya virus; YFV, yellow fever virus; WNV, West Nile virus; JEV, Japanese encephalitis virus; H1N1, influenza virus H1N1; H3N1, influenza virus H3N1; B, influenza B virus; UTR, untranslated region.
Design of the primer pair and probe
The design of the primer pair and probe was based on the alignment of the NS5 non-structural protein gene published in GenBank. The primers and the probe were designed with Primer Premier 5.0 and Primer Express 3.0.1, which generated an amplicon size of 113 bp. The sequence of the primer pair and the hydrolysis probe, along with the sizes of the expected amplicons, are summarized in Table 3. The primer pair and probe synthesized by Sangon were purified by ultra-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (ULTRAPAGE).
Table 3Sequences of the primer pair and hydrolysis probe used in this study.
Name | Sequence (5′→3′) | Length (bp) |
---|---|---|
Forward primer | TTCGGAATATGGAGGCTGAG | 20 |
Reverse primer | TCGTTTGAGCCTATCCCATC | 20 |
Probe | FAM-AGAAAGTGACCAACTGGTTGCAGAGCA-BHQ1 | 27 |
dirRT-qPCR assay
Four DNA polymerases, namely OmniTaq, AlphaTaq (VitaNavi), Tth, and TTX (TOYOBO), showing a certain degree of tolerance to inhibitors from samples, and one conventional HotTaq DNA polymerase (Sangon) were screened in the optimization step. The corresponding buffer for DNA polymerase was selected for the reaction system and the initial PCR conditions were established according to the melting temperature (Tm) value of the primer and probe and the recommended reaction temperature of DNA polymerase, where the reaction mixture contained optimized concentrations of MgCl2, dNTPs, KCl, Triton X-100, OmniTaq/AlphaTaq/ReverAce, RNase inhibitor, primer pair, probe, and sample. Each experiment was repeated in triplicate. A positive control (ZIKV RNA) and a no template control (NTC) were also included.
To optimize the dirRT-qPCR assay, KCl, Triton X-100, and PCR enhancer cocktail (PEC-2; composed of 0.2% NP-40, 0.15 mol/l d-(+)-trehalose, and 0.12 mol/l l-carnitine) were employed. On the basis of the previous reaction system corresponding to OmniTaq DNA polymerase, KCl and Triton X-100 were added to the reaction system separately or in combination. dNTPs act with a chelating effect to interact with magnesium ion (Mg2+), an important co-factor for the DNA polymerase, subsequently affecting the activity of DNA polymerase. Therefore, the concentrations of dNTPs (0.2–0.8 mM) and MgCl2 (2.5–6.5 mM) were optimized by orthogonal design. Several PCR enhancers were optimized by their supplementation, individually or in combination, in the reaction mixture of the dirRT-qPCR to further improve the amplification efficiency. Since different PCR enhancers show different capacity to enhance the efficiency of amplification in different samples, eight common PCR enhancers were screened: sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (0.05%), Tween-2 (0.1%), glycerol (1%), BSA (0.4 mg/ml), gelatin (1/10 volume), dithiothreitol (DTT) (1/10 volume), DMSO (10%), and deionized formamide (10%). These enhancers can be divided roughly into three categories, i.e. contribute to the cleavage of virus capsid and the release of nucleic acid to provide sufficient templates (SDS, Tween-20); help in stabilizing the polymerase and protecting its activity (BSA, DTT, gelatin, glycerol); help in the interaction between the primers and templates (DMSO, formamide). The dirRT-qPCR reactions were performed in a quantitative PCR instrument (7500; Applied Biosystems) with a volume of 25 μl. The dirRT-qPCR reactions for detecting ZIKV infection in the clinical samples were performed in a Mini8 Plus RT-PCR thermocycler (Coyote). The effectiveness of the dirRT-qPCR assay in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and repeatability was evaluated in simulated sample, and clinical samples were used to validate this practical performance of the assay.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using OriginPro2018, GraphPad Prism 5, and Microsoft Excel. The correlation coefficient (R2) was calculated by linear regression analysis. The repeatability of the dirRT-qPCR assay was determined by analyzing the mean cycle threshold (Ct) values of parallel reactions and standard deviations (SD) of Ct values. The mean Ct value was used as the ordinate, and the logarithm of the concentration (copies/μl) value was used as the abscissa to construct the standard curve.
Results
Optimization of the dirRT-qPCR assay
Optimization of DNA polymerase is the most important procedure to validate the best choice of polymerase that can tolerate inhibitors in multiple clinical samples with good amplification efficiency. Figure 1 shows the amplification curves using five DNA polymerases, namely OmniTaq (0.25 μl), AlphaTaq (0.25 μl), Tth (0.5 μl), TTX (0.25 μl), and HotTaq (0.5 μl), with various clinical samples, i.e. saliva (Figure 1A), serum (Figure 1B), throat swab (Figure 1C), urine (Figure 1D), and whole blood (Figure 1E). The amplification efficiency of OmniTaq DNA polymerase was higher than that of the other four polymerases for all sample types. Although the amplification efficiency of AlphaTaq DNA polymerase was similar to that of OmniTaq DNA polymerase for saliva, serum, and throat swab samples (Figure 1A–C), OmniTaq DNA polymerase was the only available polymerase that could amplify the target from the whole blood samples (Figure 1E). Meanwhile, HotTaq DNA polymerase did not work with any sample at all. As a result, OmniTaq DNA polymerase was selected for the downstream dirRT-qPCR assay and the corresponding reaction procedure was as follows: reverse transcription was performed for 5 min at 50 °C, then 94 °C for 5 s and 50 °C for 5 s for 15 cycles, followed by a PCR cycle of 94 °C for 1 min for 1 cycle, 95 °C for 5 min and 50 °C for 30 s for 40 cycles.
After investigating the choice of polymerase, optimization of the reaction mixture with conventional direct PCR enhancers, i.e., KCl (40 mM), Triton X-100 (0.1%), and PEC-2 (0.2% NP-40, 0.15 mol/L d-(+)-trehalose, and 0.12 mol/L l-carnitine), on dirRT-qPCR was performed. The Ct values and end-point fluorescence value for these experiments are summarized in Figure 2. The dirRT-qPCR assay worked better for different specimens with PEC-2, shown by the higher fluorescence intensity of the reaction in the presence of PEC-2 (about 6.3 × 105) than in the absence of PEC-2 (about 2.4 × 105) (Figure 2). It was not dependent on KCl or Triton X-100 addition, as shown by the insignificant difference in Ct values. Therefore, PEC-2 was employed in the dirRT-qPCR reaction mixture. Nonetheless, the improved amplification efficiency, determined from end-point fluorescence ΔRn intensity or end-point Ct value, using the combination of KCl and Triton X-100 could be used as an alternative to PEC-2 alone.
Optimization of the concentration of dNTPs (0.2–0.8 mM) and MgCl2 (2.5–6.5 mM) could also improve the amplification efficiency of the dirRT-qPCR assay. The Ct values and end-point fluorescence ΔRn value are summarized in three-dimensional bar graphs in Figure 3. The optimal concentrations of dNTPs and MgCl2 were determined by the lowest Ct value as well as the relatively high end-point ΔRn value. The increase in concentration of Mg2+ showed an insignificant improvement in amplification efficiency, while a high concentration of dNTPs inhibited the amplification at a low concentration of Mg2+. In this context, the optimal concentration of Mg2+ and dNTPs for the different specimens were 5.5 mM and 0.4 mM, respectively, and these concentrations were used in the dirRT-qPCR assay.
To further optimize the reaction mixture for dirRT-qPCR, supplementation with additional PCR enhancers was evaluated. The amplification curves for these experiments are shown in Figure 4A–E and the Ct values are summarized in Figure 4F. The addition of DTT or DMSO enhanced the amplification efficiency for all types of sample, while the addition of other additives could only enhance the amplification efficiency in some samples; e.g., the addition of gelatin could enhance amplification efficiency in urine but not in whole blood. By considering the ability to improve amplification efficiency in terms of both the Ct value (which determined the positive/negative ZIKV infection) and end-point fluorescence value (which evaluated the removal of inhibition), DTT was selected as the additional PCR enhancer for this dirRT-qPCR assay.
Validation of the detection sensitivity of the dirRT-qPCR
The sensitivity, including detection range and limit of detection (LOD), of this dirRT-qPCR assay for ZIKV RNA detection was first evaluated using simulated clinical samples with standard concentrations of ZIKV RNA ranging from 1.9 × 100 to 1.9 × 106 copies/μl of spiked, as well as standard concentrations of RNA from 1.9 × 100 to 1.9 × 106 copies/μl as positive control. The correlation between the copies of ZIKV RNA and the Ct value was analyzed. The real-time amplification curves and the standard curve are provided in the Supplementary Material (Figure S1A–F and G, respectively). The detection limits of ZIKV RNA from mimic saliva, serum, throat swab, urine, and RNA were 19 copies/μl, while that from simulated whole blood was 1.9 × 102 copies/μl. The mean and standard deviation Ct values of the lowest LOD and the LODs of the different samples are summarized in Table 4. The slope of −3.398 with R2 of 0.998, indicating an amplification efficiency of 99.673%, in the dynamic range from 1.9 × 102 to 1.9 × 106 copies/μl measured in the standard curve of the positive control (Supplementary Material Figure S1G), supported the effective quantification, with LOD of 9.5 × 101 copies/reaction in ZIKV RNA detection. Also, a similar mean Ct on standard RNA addition between water and simulated samples showed that this dirRT-qPCR could be performed with direct sample addition without sample pretreatment.
Table 4Summary of sensitivity and standard curve equations for the dirRT-qPCR assay.
Samples | Concentration range | Standard curve | Ct mean ± SD | LOD (copies/reaction) |
---|---|---|---|---|
RNA | 1 × 102 to 1 × 106 | y = −3.398x + 27.80 | 25.55 ± 0.10 | 9.5 × 101 |
Saliva | 1 × 102 to 1 × 106 | y = −3.203x + 29.157 | 24.46 ± 0.66 | 9.5 × 101 |
Serum | 1 × 102 to 1 × 106 | y = −3.612x + 30.145 | 26.52 ± 0.36 | 9.5 × 101 |
Throat swab | 1 × 102 to 1 × 106 | y = −3.438x + 32.732 | 24.42 ± 0.06 | 9.5 × 101 |
Urine | 1 × 102 to 1 × 106 | y = −3.751x + 31.706 | 25.16 ± 0.65 | 9.5 × 101 |
Whole blood | 1 × 102 to 1 × 106 | y = −3.477x + 29.989 | 24.42 ± 0.10 | 9.5 × 102 |
Ct, cycle threshold; SD, standard deviation; LOD, limit of detection.
The reliability of this dirRT-qPCR assay was determined according to its reproducibility with the standards of 1.9 × 101 to 1.9 × 106 copies/μl ZIKV RNA. The mean and SD Ct values for each concentration were obtained to measure the coefficient of variation (CV) in the three parallel samples set. The results showed a CV% lower than 3%, supporting the sensitive quantification as well as qualification of ZIKV.
Validation of the detection specificity of the dirRT-qPCR
The specificity of the dirRT-qPCR assay was evaluated with different types of virus and bacteria. Influenza, a common viral infection, may occur along with ZIKV infection. DENV is often confused with ZIKV infection since both are mosquito-borne diseases with similar symptoms and arise in similar regions of the world. Bacterial infections such as Salmonella and ShelloShigella show similar symptoms and may also lead to false-positive ZIKV detection. Therefore, the dirRT-qPCR assay was performed on other viruses and bacteria to demonstrate the high specificity of the assay for ZIKV detection. ZIKV RNA was detected among influenza viral RNA, viral plasmid DNA, and bacterial genomic and plasmid DNA, which remained steady below the threshold (Supplementary Material Figure S2A). This suggested that there was no cross-reaction to yield false-positive results with the other eight strains of viruses and eight strains of bacteria, as listed in Table 2. In addition, the specificity of the assay in the presence of interfering materials was evaluated. Reactions containing ZIKV RNA with or without spiking into various types of viral and bacterial plasmid and other nucleic acids as interfering materials were performed. ZIKV RNA could be amplified to the same extent with and without the presence of interfering materials (Supplementary Material Figure S2B). This suggested that the specificity of the assay was not affected by the co-presence of other infections, such as viral or bacterial infections, along with the ZIKV infection.
Validation of the detection accuracy of the dirRT-qPCR
The amplification curve and repeatability parameters of the dirRT-qPCR assay on ZIKV detection in simulated saliva, urine, and whole blood samples are shown in Supplementary Material Figure S3 and Table 5, respectively. The CV% of the Ct values, with repeated measurement six times at two different concentrations in these three samples, were 1.33% and 1.54%, 1.03% and 1.80%, and 1.07% and 1.63%, respectively. Since good repeatability was shown, with all CV% below 5%, this suggested that the ZIKV dirRT-qPCR detection method established and optimized in this study could ensure the reliability and accuracy of test results using different biological samples.
Table 5Repeatability parameters of the Zika virus dirRT-qPCR assay.
Sample | Concentration | Repeats | Mean | SD | CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Saliva | 106 | 6 | 18.53 | 0.2 | 1.07% |
104 | 6 | 24.14 | 0.39 | 1.07% | |
Urine | 105 | 6 | 20.27 | 0.3 | 1.33% |
102 | 6 | 30.11 | 0.51 | 1.54% | |
Whole blood | 106 | 6 | 18.88 | 0.2 | 1.54% |
104 | 6 | 25.78 | 0.46 | 1.80% |
SD, standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variation.
Evaluation of the dirRT-qPCR assay on clinical samples
Clinical validation of the specificity of the established dirRT-qPCR assay was performed using a total of 83 clinical samples (nine ZIKV-positive samples, four CHIKV-positive whole blood samples and four CHIKV-positive serum samples, 27 DENV-positive serum samples (15 DENV-1, nine DENV-2, one DENV-3, and two DENV-4), 27 DENV-positive whole blood samples (15 DENV-1, nine DENV-2, one DENV-3, and two DENV-4), and 12 normal samples. Five microliters of each sample was added directly to the dirRT-qPCR assay. All experiments included a negative control (NTC).
Clinical validation of the established dirRT-qPCR assay was performed with a total of 83 clinical samples. To support a high specificity of detection using clinical samples as well as simulated samples prior to detecting ZIKV clinical infection, the detection of clinical specimens of non-ZIKV infection, including different arbovirus infections and non-arbovirus infection samples, and 12 normal clinical specimens from healthy individuals were first evaluated. The absence of fluorescence signal in the total 40 cycles for the other arbovirus infection samples (DENV and CHIKV), YFV cell culture supernatant (Supplementary Material Figure S4A), and normal clinical specimens (Supplementary Material Figure S4B) when compared to the positive control suggested a low probability of false-positive results.
Clinical validation of the capacity of the dirRT-qPCR for ZIKV detection in multiple clinical ZIKV-infected specimens was performed (Table 1; Supplementary Material Figure S5). All ZIKV infection samples were detected as expected, with Ct values ranging between 15 and 30. There were slight differences in the Ct for the different samples from the same individual, suggesting that the viral concentration differs in different regions of the body. Table 6 shows a summary of viral concentrations measured in multiple clinical samples, as shown in Supplementary Material Figure S5A–C, with the corresponding standard curves shown in Supplementary Material Figure S1G. The similar viral concentrations measured in serum with and without nucleic acid validate the same efficiency of the dirRT-qPCR for clinical ZIKV diagnosis in comparison to the reference standard RT-PCR.
Table 6Summary of the s, sensitivity, Ct and the corresponding viral concentrations of the dirRT-qPCR assay in different samples and patients.
Patient | Sample | Ct | Log(viral concentration) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Saliva | 23.59 | 3.3 |
Serum | 18.75 | 2.9 | |
Serum (RNA extract) | 17.38 | 3.1 | |
Urine | 27.09 | 0.9 | |
2 | Saliva | 23.51 | 3.3 |
Serum | 19.19 | 2.8 | |
Serum (RNA extract) | 17.29 | 3.1 | |
3 | Saliva | 24.75 | 3.0 |
Urine | 26.47 | 1.1 | |
Throat swab | 26.14 | 3.1 | |
Whole blood | 25.62 | 1.5 |
Ct, cycle threshold.
The clinical positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated using a real-time RT-PCR (the current standard ZIKV detection assay for sample evaluation) as the reference test. Table 7 shows a summary of the dirRT-qPCR assay for ZIKV detection. In reference to the reference RT-PCR assay, the reported assay has 100% positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity for ZIKV diagnosis.
Table 7Summary of the positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity of the dirRT-qPCR assay.
dirRT-qPCR | Standard qPCR | ||
---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | ||
Positive | 9 | 0 | Positive predictive value = 9/9 = 1.00 |
Negative | 0 | 74 | Negative predictive value = 74/74 = 1.00 |
Sensitivity = 9/9 = 1.00 | Specificity = 74/74 = 1.00 |
Discussion
The dirRT-qPCR assay developed here offers a simple operating process to improve the time and efficiency of detecting clinical ZIKV infection. Serum and blood are currently the most common samples acquired from patients. However, whole blood reduced the sensitivity of dirRT-qPCR in all optimized conditions due to its intrinsic high concentration of complex inhibitors in comparison to other samples. The highest viral concentration was found in saliva or throat swab, then serum, while the lowest was found in urine. In this context, non-invasive saliva collection could be an alternative to replace invasive venipuncture for ZIKV diagnosis. In fact, it was observed that positive detection of viral genetic markers in the blood was only possible within 2 days after the onset of the disease, while detection in saliva was possible for at least 4 days on average. On the other hand, the calculated viral concentrations in saliva and serum samples from patients 1 and 2, which were similar to one another, matches with the fact that the samples were obtained from members of the same family. The range of the RNA viral load in blood (7.28 × 103 to 9.3 × 105 copies/μl) and urine (2.5 × 101 to 8 × 103 copies/μl) in patients in another study supports the measured viral concentrations in this study (
Atif et al., 2016
).
To eliminate the RT-PCR inhibition in clinical samples, the dirRT-qPCR assay was first optimized with the mutant of Taq polymerase, where its variants have also been reported with a higher tolerance in as high as 20% blood (
Kermekchiev et al., 2009
). Thermally activated DNA polymerase is favorable, as reverse transcription is necessary prior to PCR for RNA detection, while non-specific amplification during reverse transcription at a relatively low temperature could be prevented with thermally activated DNA polymerase. Efficient release of viral RNA in this dirRT-qPCR assay is another factor in effective diagnosis. With conventional RT-PCR, lysis reagents such as TRIzol and a high temperature (85–95 °C) can promote the release of viral RNA (
Bachofen et al., 2013
,
Nishimura et al., 2010
). For example, HP-PRRSV RNA was effectively released at 55 °C in 30 min 22. However, pretreatment at high temperatures will lead to the degradation of RNA. A non-ionic detergent, such as Triton X-100, and ingredients such as NP-40 in the PEC-2 additionally facilitate the denaturation of viral capsid protein and release of the RNA 20.
The dirRT-qPCR for clinical samples simplifies the operation, supporting point-of-care diagnosis for on-site screening. Indeed, the uncontrolled spread of ZIKV in high population areas is an emerging issue, as the transmission of ZIKV by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus vectors in heavy traffic environments such as borders has already been observed in Asia (
Dasti, 2016
,
Wu et al., 2011
). This dirRT-qPCR method supports the high-throughput detection of ZIKV and other viral infectious diseases, as the primer–probe combination could also be extended. It ultimately realizes the goal of large-scale on-site screening of viral infection for early diagnosis and the prevention and control of epidemic viral outbreaks.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgement
This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFC0809200, No. 2016YFF0203203), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. K16026), Guangdong Science and Technology Foundation (No. 2017B020210006, No. 2016A020219005, No. 20160223), and Shenzhen Science and Technology Foundation (No. CKCY20170720100145297, No. JCYJ20160427151920801, No. JCYJ20170307104024209) and Open project of Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Control of Ministry of Enducation (Sun Yat-sen University) (No. 2019kfkt06).
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following are Supplementary data to this article:
References
-
Capacity of nine thermostable DNA polymerases to mediate DNA amplification in the presence of PCR-Inhibiting samples.Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998; 64: 3748-3753
-
Effects of amplification facilitators on diagnostic PCR in the presence of blood, feces, and meat.J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38: 4463-4470
-
Purification and characterization of PCR-inhibitory components in blood cells.J Clin Microbiol. 2001; 39: 485-493
-
Identification and characterization of immunoglobulin G in blood as a major inhibitor of diagnostic PCR.J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38: 345-350
-
Zika virus disease: a current review of the literature.Infection. 2016; 44: 695-705
-
Direct RT-qPCR from serum enables fast and cost-effective phylogenetic analysis of bovine viral diarrhoea virus.J Virol Methods. 2013; 190: 1-3
-
Isolation of Infective Zika Virus from Urine and Saliva of Patients in Brazil.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016; 10e0004816
-
Zika Virus Infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro.N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 2321-2334
-
Direct polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from human whole blood and filter-paper-dried blood by using a PCR buffer with a higher pH.Anal Biochem. 2008; 375: 370-372
-
de Meid of fetuses with microcephaly in Brazil: a case study.Lancet Infect Dis. 2016; 1: 653-660
-
Zika Virus Outbreak, Bahia, Brazil.Emerg Infectious Dis. 2015; 21: 1885
-
Guillain-Barré Syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: a case-control study.The Lancet. 2016; 387: 1531-1539
-
Zika virus infections: An o verview of current scenario.Asian Pac J Tropical Med. 2016; 9: 601-605
-
Zika virus. I. Isolations and serological specificity.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1952; 46: 509-520
-
Direct DNA and RNA detection from large volumes of whole human blood.Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 1
-
Genetic Characterization of Zika Virus Strains: geographic expansion of the Asian lineage.Plos Neglected Tropical Dis. 2012; 6: e1477
-
Zika virus, french polynesia, South Pacific, 2013.Emerg Infect Dis. 2014; : 1960
-
Molecular biology of flaviviruses.Novartis Found Symp. 2006; 277: 23-39
-
High specificity of a novel Zika virus ELISA in European patients after exposure to different flaviviruses.Euro Surveill. 2016; 21
-
Whole-blood polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism: a simplified method by microwave irradiation.Med Princ Pract. 2009; 18: 280
-
A direct real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid high-throughput detection of highly pathogenic North American porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in China without RNA purification.J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2015; 5: 45
-
Mutants of Taq DNA polymerase resistant to PCR inhibitors allow DNA amplification from whole blood and crude soil samples.Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37: e40
-
Inhibitory effects of urine on the polymerase chain reaction for cytomegalovirus DNA.J Clin Pathol. 1991; 44: 360
-
Direct polymerase chain reaction from whole blood without DNA isolation.Ann Clin Biochem. 2000; 37: 674-680
-
Detection of noroviruses in fecal specimens by direct RT-qPCR without RNA purification.J Virol Methods. 2010; 163: 282
-
Direct PCR from solid tissue without DNA extraction.Nucleic Acids Res. 1993; 21: 4656
-
PCR inhibitors-occurrence, properties and removal.J Appl Microbiol. 2012; 113: 1014-1026
-
Isothermal single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping and direct PCR from whole blood using a novel whole-blood lysis buffer.Mol Diagn Ther. 2009; 13: 383-387
-
Effects of anticoagulants and storage of blood-samples on efficacy of the polymerase chain-reaction assay for hepatitis-C virus.J. Clin. Microbiol. 1992; 30: 750-753
-
Rapid and sensitive detection of Zika virus by reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification.J Virological Methods. 2016; 238: 86-93
-
Early prediction of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection relapse in nonresponders to primary interferon therapy by means of HCV RNA whole-blood analysis.Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39: 1754-1760
-
Distribution of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in northwestern China.Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011; 11: 1181
-
A novel buffer system, AnyDirect, can improve polymerase chain reaction from whole blood without DNA isolation.Clin Chim Acta. 2007; 380: 112-117
-
First report of autochthonous transmission of Zika virus inBrazil.Memã³rias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2015; 110: 569
-
Direct DNA amplification from crude clinical samples using a PCR enhancer cocktail and novel mutants of Taq.J Mol Diagn. 2010; 12: 152-161
Article info
Publication history
Published online: June 13, 2019
Accepted: June 9, 2019
Received in revised form: May 28, 2019
Received: January 30, 2019
Corresponding Editor: Eskild Petersen, Aarhus, Denmark.
Identification
Copyright
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |How you can reuse
Elsevier's open access license policy
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy