Review article
The public health impacts of surface coal mining

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.08.006 Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Surface coal mining causes local air and water pollution.

  • Epidemiological data demonstrate that populations in mining communities have poor health.

  • Environmental and public health impacts are pronounced in mountaintop removal mining areas.

  • Additional studies of exposure, dose, and biological impact are needed.

  • The preponderance of evidence indicates that mountaintop removal mining should be discontinued.

Abstract

The current paper reviews published evidence on the public health impacts of surface coal mining. Particular attention is paid to recent evidence for a form of surface mining practiced in the United States, namely mountaintop removal mining. Studies from other parts of the world are also briefly described. Evidence is presented that documents epidemiological disease patterns for populations living in proximity to surface mining. Environmental evidence has shown that surface waters and biota are harmed by mountaintop removal, while other environmental studies have shown water and air pollution exist in residential areas close to mining. Studies that are able to directly link environmental exposure, dose, and biological impact are urgently needed. Although direct mechanistic links are not well understood, the weight of the evidence reinforces previous science-based calls to discontinue mountaintop removal mining due to its environmental and public health risks.

Introduction

“Dr. Diane Shafer, a busy orthopedic surgeon in Williamson, the Mingo County [WV] seat, noticed that a surprising number of her patients in their fifties were afflicted with early-onset dementia. In addition, she was hearing more and more complaints about kidney stones, thyroid problems, and gastrointestinal problems such as bellyaches and diarrhea. Incidents of cancer and birth defects seemed to be rising, too. She had no formal studies to back her up, but … she knew that many people who lived in the hills beyond the reach of the municipal water supply had problems with their water.” Jeff Goodell, Big Coal, pp. 40–41.

Jeff Goodell, a highly regarded journalist, published the book Big Coal in 2006 (Goodell, 2006). The book details the environmental and economic costs of America’s reliance on coal as an energy source. He also describes the public health harm caused by burning coal in power plants, for which there is considerable research evidence. Scattered here and there in the book’s pages are impressions of local mining community residents, such as Dr. Shafer, that the mining of coal, not just its burning, causes public health problems as well. But research evidence that could support or refute these impressions was lacking.

At that time the research evidence that was available on coal mining’s health impacts seemed to be limited to studies on occupational exposure, and to a few studies conducted in Great Britain on mining’s possible larger public health impacts. Regarding occupational exposures, underground coal mining is known to increase risk of pneumoconiosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer and perhaps other illnesses (Castranova and Vallyathan, 2000, Coggon and Taylor, 1998, Graber et al., 2014, Laney et al., 2012, Scott et al., 2004). These occupational diseases are related to inhalation of coal and rock dust and other mining related chemicals, that is, to air quality problems. The studies in Great Britain also focused on air quality, and examined possible respiratory problems for people, usually children, who lived near open-cast or surface coal mining sites (Brabin et al., 1994, Temple and Sykes, 1992). Yet, as suggested above by Dr. Shafer’s concern, the original focus in examining possible public health consequences of surface mining in the United States emphasized water quality issues.

The issue is complicated by the fact that mining populations, especially in Appalachia in the eastern United States, experience high levels of poverty, and often engage in poor health behavior reflected by high smoking and obesity rates. It is relatively easy to show that mining populations have poor public health outcomes, but more challenging to identify whether or not environmental conditions caused by mining contribute to those outcomes over and above socioeconomic and behavioral risks. The current paper reviews the literature on the public health consequences of coal mining, focusing especially but not exclusively on evidence since 2006 and evidence from mining in Appalachia. Appalachia is a focus because of the advent of mountaintop removal mining, a form of large scale surface coal mining that has major environmental impacts, occurs in close connection to human settlements and has been most clearly identified as a public health concern by local residents. The paper will review the evidence base and present questions that direct the next research and policy steps that should be undertaken to understand, and where indicated to reduce, the negative environmental impacts of coal mining on public health. Before beginning to review the health literature, the paper provides a brief description of mountaintop removal mining and its ecological impacts.

Section snippets

Mountaintop removal mining

Mountaintop removal mining (MTR) is an aggressive form of surface coal mining that occurs on ridges and mountaintops in steep terrain. The depth and size of the coal seams and the topography of the land sometimes make other forms of mining impractical. It occurs in areas of four states in Central Appalachia including Kentucky, West Virginia, Virginia, and Tennessee, and is distributed over an area approximately equal in size to the states of Vermont and New Hampshire combined. About three

Early health studies

Research conducted prior to Mr. Goodell’s publication includes a large body of evidence on the occupational health risks of coal mining. A few of those studies were cited above. The current review will not attempt to summarize that literature, but rather points to it only to illustrate that harmful consequences of exposure to mining activity have long been known. Miners are exposed to diesel particulates, dust, chemicals, fuels and elemental toxicants (Scott et al., 2004). Of course, exposures

Epidemiological evidence of public health disparities in Appalachian mining communities

As a consequence of the anecdotal and other early evidence, a series of epidemiological studies were conducted in Appalachia beginning with a study that showed significantly higher hospitalization rates for hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a function of tons of coal mined (Hendryx et al., 2007). This was followed by a study of self-reported health indicators in a large representative telephone survey of over 16,000 people in West Virginia (Hendryx and Ahern, 2008).

Environmental conditions in mining communities

We know that MTR has detrimental impacts on surface waters (e.g. Palmer et al., 2010), but whether those impacts affect human health through drinking water is more difficult to ascertain. Community residents have expressed concerns about water quality in proximity to mining activity in a Kentucky study (Blakeney and Marshall, 2009). In addition to the mining itself, there is concern that contamination of private wells may occur through chemicals used in the coal cleaning process. After coal is

Biological links between MTR exposures and health

There is strong epidemiological evidence for poor health conditions in mining communities, especially in relationship to MTR. There is increasing evidence for air, and to a lesser extent, water quality problems in relationship to human exposures in these mining communities. Connecting these two lines of evidence would be studies that link environmental exposure, dose, and biological impact. Research in this vein has only started to emerge. The first study in this area was based on particulate

Conclusions and next steps

A summary of the evidence for the public health impacts of coal mining includes the following observations and recommendations. First, the epidemiological evidence for poor health status in mining communities is strong. Any single epidemiological paper reported here has limitations. Covariates were measured and used as statistical controls but some degree of residual confounding is possible. Some studies were based on county-level ecological data. Some report mining exposure at the county level

References (67)

  • A.B. Blakeney et al.

    Water quality, health, and human occupations

    Am. J. Occup. Ther.

    (2009)
  • B. Brabin et al.

    Respiratory morbidity in Meyerside schoolchildren exposed to coal dust and air pollution

    Arch. Dis. Child.

    (1994)
  • L. Cain et al.

    Learning outcomes among students in relation to West Virginia coal mining: an environmental riskscape approach

    Environ. Justice

    (2010)
  • V. Castranova et al.

    Silicosis and coal workers’ pneumoconiosis

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (2000)
  • W.J. Christian et al.

    Exploring geographic variation in lung cancer incidence in Kentucky using a spatial scan statistic: elevated risk in the Appalachian coal-mining region

    Public Health Rep.

    (2011)
  • D. Coggon et al.

    Coal mining and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review of the evidence

    Thorax

    (1998)
  • R.J. Delfino et al.

    Potential role of ultrafine particles in associations between airborne particle mass and cardiovascular health

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (2005)
  • A. Ducatman et al.

    Coal slurry waste underground injection assessment

    Final Report: Phase II. Prepared for the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

    (2010)
  • L. Esch et al.

    Chronic cardiovascular disease mortality in mountaintop mining areas of central Appalachian states

    J. Rural Health

    (2011)
  • P. Galuszka

    Strip mining on steroids

    Bloomberg Business

    (1997)
  • M.K. Ghose et al.

    Status of air pollution caused by coal washery projects in India

    Environ. Monit. Assess.

    (1995)
  • M.K. Ghose et al.

    Assessment of dust generation due to opencast coal mining - an Indian case study

    Environ. Monit. Assess.

    (2000)
  • M.K. Ghose et al.

    Characteristics of hazardous airborne dust around an Indian surface coal mining area

    Environ. Monit. Assess.

    (2007)
  • M.K. Ghose

    Generation and quantification of hazardous dusts from coal mining in the Indian context

    Environ. Monit. Assess.

    (2007)
  • J. Goodell

    Big Coal

    (2006)
  • J.M. Graber et al.

    Respiratory disease mortality among US coal miners: results after 37 years of follow-up

    Occup. Environ. Med.

    (2014)
  • M. Hendryx et al.

    Relations between health indicators and residential proximity to coal mining in West Virginia

    Am. J. Public Health

    (2008)
  • M. Hendryx et al.

    Mortality in Appalachian coal mining regions: the value of statistical life lost

    Public Health Rep.

    (2009)
  • M. Hendryx et al.

    Increased risk of depression for persons living in coal mining areas of Central Appalachia

    Ecopsychology

    (2013)
  • M. Hendryx et al.

    An examination of the effects of mountaintop removal coal mining on respiratory symptoms and COPD using propensity scores

    Int. J. Environ. Health Res.

    (2014)
  • M. Hendryx et al.

    Hospitalization patterns associated with Appalachian coal mining

    J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A

    (2007)
  • M. Hendryx et al.

    A geographical information system-based analysis of cancer mortality and population exposure to coal mining activities in West Virginia, United States of America

    Geospat. Health

    (2010)
  • M. Hendryx et al.

    Public drinking water violations in mountaintop coal mining areas of West Virginia, USA

    Water Qual. Exp. Health

    (2012)
  • Cited by (61)

    • IoT enabled HELMET to safeguard the health of mine workers

      2022, Computer Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      The workplace is filled with various known and unknown hazards that may even cause death [5,6] (refer Fig. 1). These human resources work in underpasses with rapid temperature variation, deficiency of oxygen, hazardous gases, variations in humidity, and other undesirable and unanticipated risks [7–11]. The workers are oblivious of all the risks; as a result, they are inhaling a lot of contaminated particles, which can harm their internal organs cause severe illnesses and even death [12–16].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text