Advertisement
Articles| Volume 387, ISSUE 10031, P1937-1946, May 07, 2016

Download started.

Ok

Global and regional health effects of future food production under climate change: a modelling study

Published:March 02, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01156-3

      Summary

      Background

      One of the most important consequences of climate change could be its effects on agriculture. Although much research has focused on questions of food security, less has been devoted to assessing the wider health impacts of future changes in agricultural production. In this modelling study, we estimate excess mortality attributable to agriculturally mediated changes in dietary and weight-related risk factors by cause of death for 155 world regions in the year 2050.

      Methods

      For this modelling study, we linked a detailed agricultural modelling framework, the International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT), to a comparative risk assessment of changes in fruit and vegetable consumption, red meat consumption, and bodyweight for deaths from coronary heart disease, stroke, cancer, and an aggregate of other causes. We calculated the change in the number of deaths attributable to climate-related changes in weight and diets for the combination of four emissions pathways (a high emissions pathway, two medium emissions pathways, and a low emissions pathway) and three socioeconomic pathways (sustainable development, middle of the road, and more fragmented development), which each included six scenarios with variable climatic inputs.

      Findings

      The model projects that by 2050, climate change will lead to per-person reductions of 3·2% (SD 0·4%) in global food availability, 4·0% (0·7%) in fruit and vegetable consumption, and 0·7% (0·1%) in red meat consumption. These changes will be associated with 529 000 climate-related deaths worldwide (95% CI 314 000–736 000), representing a 28% (95% CI 26–33) reduction in the number of deaths that would be avoided because of changes in dietary and weight-related risk factors between 2010 and 2050. Twice as many climate-related deaths were associated with reductions in fruit and vegetable consumption than with climate-related increases in the prevalence of underweight, and most climate-related deaths were projected to occur in south and east Asia. Adoption of climate-stabilisation pathways would reduce the number of climate-related deaths by 29–71%, depending on their stringency.

      Interpretation

      The health effects of climate change from changes in dietary and weight-related risk factors could be substantial, and exceed other climate-related health impacts that have been estimated. Climate change mitigation could prevent many climate-related deaths. Strengthening of public health programmes aimed at preventing and treating diet and weight-related risk factors could be a suitable climate change adaptation strategy.

      Funding

      Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food.
      This article is available free of charge.
      Simply log in to access the full article, or register for free if you do not yet have a username and password.
      Already registered?
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
      Not yet registered?
      Register for free

      References

      1. 1.
        • Costello A
        • Abbas M
        • Allen A
        • et al.
        Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission.
        Lancet. 2009; 373: 1693-1733
      2. 2.
        • Smith KR
        • Woodward A
        • Campbell-Lendrum D
        • et al.
        Human health: impacts, adaptation and co-benefits.
        in: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Interngovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA2014: 709-754
      3. 3.
        • Porter JR
        • Xie L
        • Challinor A
        • et al.
        Food security and food production systems.
        in: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA2014: 485-533
      4. 4.
        • Confalonieri U
        • Menne B
        • Akhtar R
        • et al.
        Human health.
        in: Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK2007: 391-431
      5. 5.
        • Rosenzweig C
        • Elliott J
        • Deryng D
        • et al.
        Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; 111: 3268-3273
      6. 6.
        • Nelson GC
        • Valin H
        • Sands RD
        • et al.
        Climate change effects on agriculture: economic responses to biophysical shocks.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014; 111: 3274-3279
      7. 7.
        • Nelson GC
        • Rosegrant MW
        • Palazzo A
        • et al.
        Food security, farming, and climate change to 2050: scenarios, results, policy options. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC2010
      8. 8.
        • Wheeler T
        • von Braun J
        Climate change impacts on global food security.
        Science. 2013; 341: 508-513
      9. 9.
        • Dangour AD
        • Green R
        • Häsler B
        • Rushton J
        • Shankar B
        • Waage J
        Linking agriculture and health in low-and middle-income countries: an interdisciplinary research agenda.
        Proc Nutr Soc. 2012; 71: 222-228
      10. 10.
        • Hawkesworth S
        • Dangour AD
        • Johnston D
        • et al.
        Feeding the world healthily: the challenge of measuring the effects of agriculture on health.
        Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010; 365: 3083-3097
      11. 11.
        • Nugent R
        Bringing agriculture to the table: how agriculture and food can play a role in preventing chronic disease. The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Chicago2011
      12. 12.
        • WHO
        Diet, nutrition, and the prevention of chronic diseases: report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organization, Geneva1990
      13. 13.
        • Lim SS
        • Vos T
        • Flaxman AD
        • et al.
        A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
        Lancet. 2012; 380: 2224-2260
      14. 14.
        • Lozano R
        • Naghavi M
        • Foreman K
        • et al.
        Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
        Lancet. 2012; 380: 2095-2128
      15. 15.
        • Valin H
        • Sands RD
        • van der Mensbrugghe D
        • et al.
        The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models.
        Agric Econ. 2014; 45: 51-67
      16. 16.
        • Kearney J
        Food consumption trends and drivers.
        Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010; 365: 2793-2807
      17. 17.
        • Müller C
        • Robertson RD
        Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling.
        Agric Econ. 2014; 45: 37-50
      18. 18.
        • Dauchet L
        • Amouyel P
        • Dallongeville J
        Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
        Neurology. 2005; 65: 1193-1197
      19. 19.
        • Dauchet L
        • Amouyel P
        • Hercberg S
        • Dallongeville J
        Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
        J Nutr. 2006; 136: 2588-2593
      20. 20.
        • World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research
        Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. American Institute for Cancer Research, Washington, DC2007
      21. 21.
        • Micha R
        • Wallace SK
        • Mozaffarian D
        Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Circulation. 2010; 121: 2271-2283
      22. 22.
        • Chen G-C
        • Lv D-B
        • Pang Z
        • Liu Q-F
        Red and processed meat consumption and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
        Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013; 67: 91-95
      23. 23.
        • Berrington de Gonzalez A
        • Hartge P
        • Cerhan JR
        • et al.
        Body-mass index and mortality among 1.46 million white adults.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 2211-2219
      24. 24.
        • Whitlock G
        • Lewington S
        • et al.
        • Prospective Studies Collaboration
        Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies.
        Lancet. 2009; 373: 1083-1096
      25. 25.
        • Rosengrant MW
        • Ringler C
        • Msangi
        • et al.
        International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT): model description. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington2012
      26. 26.
        • Robinson S
        • Mason D'Croz D
        • Islam S
        • et al.
        The International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT): model description for version 3. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1483. 2015. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
        (accessed Jan 18, 2016).
      27. 27.
        • Ebi KL
        • Hallegatte S
        • Kram T
        • et al.
        A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions.
        Clim Change. 2013; 122: 363-372
      28. 28.
        • van Vuuren DP
        • Kriegler E
        • O'Neill BC
        • et al.
        A new scenario framework for climate change research: scenario matrix architecture.
        Clim Change. 2013; 122: 373-386
      29. 29.
        • Chateau J
        • Dellink R
        • Lanzi E
        • Magne B
        Long-term economic growth and environmental pressure: reference scenarios for future global projections. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
        (accessed Jan 18, 2015).
      30. 30.
        • KC S
        • Lutz W
        The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: population scenarios by age, sex, and level of education for all countries to 2100.
        Glob Environ Change. 2014; (published online July 4.)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004
      31. 31.
        • O'Neill BC
        • Carter T
        • Ebi KL
        • et al.
        Meeting report of the workshop on the nature and use of new socioeconomic pathways for climate change research.
        (accessed Jan 17, 2015).
      32. 32.
        • Collins M
        • Knutti R
        • Arblaster JM
        • et al.
        Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility.
        in: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA2013
      33. 33.
        • Van Vuuren DP
        • Edmonds J
        • Kainuma M
        • et al.
        The representative concentration pathways: an overview.
        Clim Change. 2011; 109: 5-31
      34. 34.
        • Jones CD
        • Hughes JK
        • Bellouin N
        • et al.
        The HadGEM2-ES implementation of CMIP5 centennial simulations.
        Geosci Model Dev. 2011; 4: 543-570
      35. 35.
        • Dufresne J-L
        • Foujols M-A
        • Denvil S
        • et al.
        Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5.
        Clim Dyn. 2013; 40: 2123-2165
      36. 36.
        • Watanabe S
        • Hajima T
        • Sudo K
        • et al.
        MIROC-ESM 2010: model description and basic results of CMIP5-20c3m experiments.
        Geosci Model Dev. 2011; 4: 845-872
      37. 37.
        • Jones JW
        • Hoogenboom G
        • Porter CH
        • et al.
        The DSSAT cropping system model.
        Eur J Agron. 2003; 18: 235-265
      38. 38.
        • Bondeau A
        • Smith PC
        • Zaehle S
        • et al.
        Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance.
        Glob Change Biol. 2007; 13: 679-706
      39. 39.
        • Gustavsson J
        • Cederberg C
        • Sonesson U
        • Van Otterdijk R
        • Meybeck A
        Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention. FAO, Rome2011 (accessed Oct 31, 2014).
      40. 40.
        • Cover TM
        • Thomas JA
        Elements of information theory. 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ2006
      41. 41.
        • Murray CJ
        • Ezzati M
        • Lopez AD
        • Rodgers A
        • Vander Hoorn S
        Comparative quantification of health risks: conceptual framework and methodological issues.
        Popul Health Metr. 2003; 1: 1
      42. 42.
        • Scarborough P
        • Nnoaham KE
        • Clarke D
        • Capewell S
        • Rayner M
        Modelling the impact of a healthy diet on cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality.
        J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012; 66: 420-426
      43. 43.
        • Ezzati M
        • Vander Hoorn S
        • Rodgers A
        • Lopez AD
        • Mathers CD
        • Murray CJ
        Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors.
        Lancet. 2003; 362: 271-280
      44. 44.
        • WHO
        Quantitative risk assessment of the effects of climate change on selected causes of death, 2030s and 2050s. World Health Organization, Geneva2014
      45. 45.
        • Hall KD
        • Guo J
        • Dore M
        • Chow CC
        The progressive increase of food waste in America and its environmental impact.
        PLoS One. 2009; 4: e7940
      46. 46.
        • Parfitt J
        • Barthel M
        • Macnaughton S
        Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050.
        Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010; 365: 3065-3081

      Linked Articles

      • Food, hunger, health, and climate change
        • According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the effects of climate change on food security could be some of the most serious in the near-to-medium term, especially if global mean temperature increases by 3–4°C or more.1,2 In The Lancet, Marco Springmann and colleagues3 dig deeper, and report the most advanced projections so far of the effects of climate change on food and health for 155 regions in the year 2050. The researchers drew on a rich mixture of emission trajectories, socioeconomic pathways, and possible climate responses to model effects on global production, trade, and consumption.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF
      View full text