Advertisement
Review| Volume 17, ISSUE 12, e420-e428, December 2017

Download started.

Ok

The basic reproduction number (R0) of measles: a systematic review

      Summary

      The basic reproduction number, R nought (R0), is defined as the average number of secondary cases of an infectious disease arising from a typical case in a totally susceptible population, and can be estimated in populations if pre-existing immunity can be accounted for in the calculation. R0 determines the herd immunity threshold and therefore the immunisation coverage required to achieve elimination of an infectious disease. As R0 increases, higher immunisation coverage is required to achieve herd immunity. In July, 2010, a panel of experts convened by WHO concluded that measles can and should be eradicated. Despite the existence of an effective vaccine, regions have had varying success in measles control, in part because measles is one of the most contagious infections. For measles, R0 is often cited to be 12–18, which means that each person with measles would, on average, infect 12–18 other people in a totally susceptible population. We did a systematic review to find studies reporting rigorous estimates and determinants of measles R0. Studies were included if they were a primary source of R0, addressed pre-existing immunity, and accounted for pre-existing immunity in their calculation of R0. A search of key databases was done in January, 2015, and repeated in November, 2016, and yielded 10 883 unique citations. After screening for relevancy and quality, 18 studies met inclusion criteria, providing 58 R0 estimates. We calculated median measles R0 values stratified by key covariates. We found that R0 estimates vary more than the often cited range of 12–18. Our results highlight the importance of countries calculating R0 using locally derived data or, if this is not possible, using parameter estimates from similar settings. Additional data and agreed review methods are needed to strengthen the evidence base for measles elimination modelling.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
      Or purchase The Lancet Choice
      Access any 5 articles from the Lancet Family of journals

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Lancet Infectious Diseases
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. 1.
        • Bentley J
        • Rouse J
        • Pinfield J
        Measles: pathology, management and public health issues.
        Nurs Stand. 2014; 28: 51-58
      2. 2.
        • Hajj Hussein I
        • Chams N
        • Chams S
        • et al.
        Vaccines through centuries: major cornerstones of global health.
        Front Public Health. 2015; 3: 269
      3. 3.
        • Cutts FT
        • Lessler J
        • Metcalf CJ
        Measles elimination: progress, challenges and implications for rubella control.
        Expert Rev Vaccines. 2013; 12: 917-932
      4. 4.
        • WHO
        Proceedings of the Global Technical Consultation to assess the feasibility of measles eradication, 28–30 July 2010.
        J Infect Dis. 2011; 204: S4-13
      5. 5.
        • Anderson R
        • May R
        Infectious disease of humans. Oxford University Press, Oxford1991: 768
      6. 6.
        • Vynnycky E
        • White R
        An introduction to infectious disease modelling. Oxford University Press, Oxford2010
      7. 7.
        • Anderson RM
        • May RM
        Directly transmitted infections diseases: control by vaccination.
        Science. 1982; 215: 1053-1060
      8. 8.
        • Anderson RM
        • May RM
        Age-related changes in the rate of disease transmission: implications for the design of vaccination programmes.
        J Hyg (Lond). 1985; 94: 365-436
      9. 9.
        • Rosella L
        • Bowman C
        • Pach B
        • Morgan S
        • Fitzpatrick T
        • Goel V
        The development and validation of a meta-tool for quality appraisal of public health evidence: Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT).
        Public Health. 2016; 136: 57-65
      10. 10.
        • Paterson BJ
        • Kirk MD
        • Cameron AS
        • D'Este C
        • Durrheim DN
        Historical data and modern methods reveal insights in measles epidemiology: a retrospective closed cohort study.
        BMJ Open. 2013; 3: e002033
      11. 11.
        • Becker NG
        • Hasofer AM
        Estimating the transmission rate for a highly infectious disease.
        Biometrics. 1998; 54: 730-738
      12. 12.
        • Merler S
        • Ajelli M
        Deciphering the relative weights of demographic transition and vaccination in the decrease of measles incidence in Italy.
        Proc Biol Sci. 2014; 281: 20132676
      13. 13.
        • Metcalf CJ
        • Bjornstad ON
        • Grenfell BT
        • Andreasen V
        Seasonality and comparative dynamics of six childhood infections in pre-vaccination Copenhagen.
        Proc Biol Sci. 2009; 276: 4111-4118
      14. 14.
        • Dietz K
        Transmission and control of arboviruses.
        in: Ludwig D Cooke KL Proceedings of the SIMS conference on epidemiology. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA1975: 104-121
      15. 15.
        • Olsen LF
        • Truty GL
        • Schaffer WM
        Oscillations and chaos in epidemics: a nonlinear dynamic study of six childhood diseases in Copenhagen, Denmark.
        Theor Popul Biol. 1988; 33: 344-370
      16. 16.
        • Hooker G
        • Ellner SP
        • Roditi Lde V
        • Earn DJ
        Parameterizing state-space models for infectious disease dynamics by generalized profiling: measles in Ontario.
        J R Soc Interface. 2011; 8: 961-974
      17. 17.
        • Edmunds WJ
        • Gay NJ
        • Kretzschmar M
        • Pebody RG
        • Wachmann H
        • ESEN Project
        • European Sero-epidemiology Network
        The pre-vaccination epidemiology of measles, mumps and rubella in Europe: implications for modelling studies.
        Epidemiol Infect. 2000; 125: 635-650
      18. 18.
        • Wallinga J
        • Levy-Bruhl D
        • Gay NJ
        • Wachmann CH
        Estimation of measles reproduction ratios and prospects for elimination of measles by vaccination in some western European countries.
        Epidemiol Infect. 2001; 127: 281-295
      19. 19.
        • He D
        • Ionides EL
        • King AA
        Plug-and-play inference for disease dynamics: measles in large and small populations as a case study.
        J R Soc Interface. 2010; 7: 271-283
      20. 20.
        • Szusz EK
        • Garrison LP
        • Bauch CT
        A review of data needed to parameterize a dynamic model of measles in developing countries.
        BMC Res Notes. 2010; 3 (75-0500-3-75.)
      21. 21.
        • Broutin H
        • Mantilla-Beniers NB
        • Simondon F
        • et al.
        Epidemiological impact of vaccination on the dynamics of two childhood diseases in rural Senegal.
        Microbes Infect. 2005; 7: 593-599
      22. 22.
        • Mossong J
        • Muller CP
        Estimation of the basic reproduction number of measles during an outbreak in a partially vaccinated population.
        Epidemiol Infect. 2000; 124: 273-278
      23. 23.
        • Wallinga J
        • Teunis P
        • Kretzschmar M
        Reconstruction of measles dynamics in a vaccinated population.
        Vaccine. 2003; 21: 2643-2650
      24. 24.
        • Grais RF
        • Ferrari MJ
        • Dubray C
        • et al.
        Estimating transmission intensity for a measles epidemic in Niamey, Niger: lessons for intervention.
        Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006; 100: 867-873
      25. 25.
        • van Boven M
        • Kretzschmar M
        • Wallinga J
        • O'Neill PD
        • Wichmann O
        • Hahne S
        Estimation of measles vaccine efficacy and critical vaccination coverage in a highly vaccinated population.
        J R Soc Interface. 2010; 7: 1537-1544
      26. 26.
        • Glasser JW
        • Feng Z
        • Omer SB
        • Smith PJ
        • Rodewald LE
        The effect of heterogeneity in uptake of the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine on the potential for outbreaks of measles: a modelling study.
        Lancet Infect Dis. 2016; 16: 599-605
      27. 27.
        • Plans Rubio P
        Is the basic reproductive number (R0) for measles viruses observed in recent outbreaks lower than in the pre-vaccination era?.
        Euro Surveill. 2012; 17: 22
      28. 28.
        • Vivancos R
        • Keenan A
        • Farmer S
        • et al.
        An ongoing large outbreak of measles in Merseyside, England, January to June 2012.
        Euro Surveill. 2012; 17: 20226
      29. 29.
        • Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat (DESA)
        2015 country snapshots.
        (accessed June 25, 2017).
      30. 30.
        • Ridenhour B
        • Kowalik JM
        • Shay DK
        Unraveling R0: considerations for public health applications.
        Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015; 38: 167-176
      31. 31.
        • Biggerstaff M
        • Cauchemez S
        • Reed C
        • Gambhir M
        • Finelli L
        Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature.
        BMC Infect Dis. 2014; 14 (1471-2334-14-480.)
      32. 32.
        • Johansson MA
        • Hombach J
        • Cummings DA
        Models of the impact of dengue vaccines: a review of current research and potential approaches.
        Vaccine. 2011; 29: 5860-5868
      33. 33.
        • Yoshikura H
        Impact of population size on incidence of rubella and measles in comparison with that of other infectious diseases.
        Jpn J Infect Dis. 2015; 68: 80
      34. 34.
        • McLean AR
        • Anderson RM
        Measles in developing countries. Part I. Epidemiological parameters and patterns.
        Epidemiol Infect. 1988; 100: 111-133
      35. 35.
        • Breban R
        • Vardavas R
        • Blower S
        Theory versus data: how to calculate R0?.
        PLoS One. 2007; 2: e282
      36. 36.
        • Heffernan JM
        • Smith RJ
        • Wahl LM
        Perspectives on the basic reproductive ratio.
        J R Soc Interface. 2005; 2: 281-293
      37. 37.
        • Li J
        • Blakeley D
        • Smith RJ
        The failure of R0.
        Comput Math Methods Med. 2011; 2011: 527610
      38. 38.
        • Thompson KM
        Evolution and use of dynamic transmission models for measles and rubella risk and policy analysis.
        Risk Anal. 2016; 36: 1383-1403
      39. 39.
        • Holme P
        • Masuda N
        The basic reproduction number as a predictor for epidemic outbreaks in temporal networks.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0120567
      40. 40.
        • Cori A
        • Ferguson NM
        • Fraser C
        • Cauchemez S
        A new framework and software to estimate time-varying reproduction numbers during epidemics.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2013; 178: 1505-1512
      41. 41.
        • Stevens GA
        • Alkema L
        • Black RE
        • et al.
        Guidelines for accurate and transparent health estimates reporting: the GATHER statement.
        Lancet. 2016; 388: e19-e23
      42. 42.
        • Guyatt GH
        • Oxman AD
        • Schunemann HJ
        • Tugwell P
        • Knottnerus A
        GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 380-382
      43. 43.
        • Pitman R
        • Fisman D
        • Zaric GS
        • et al.
        Dynamic transmission modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force Working Group-5.
        Med Decis Making. 2012; 32: 712-721
      44. 44.
        • Obadia T
        • Haneef R
        • Boelle PY
        The R0 package: a toolbox to estimate reproduction numbers for epidemic outbreaks.
        BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12 (1472-6947-12-147.)
      45. 45.
        • Heesterbeek H
        • Anderson RM
        • Andreasen V
        • et al.
        Modeling infectious disease dynamics in the complex landscape of global health.
        Science. 2015; 347: aaa4339
      46. 46.
        • Hyman JM
        • Li J
        An intuitive formulation for the reproductive number for the spread of diseases in heterogeneous populations.
        Math Biosci. 2000; 167: 65-86
      47. 47.
        • Fisman DN
        • Hauck TS
        • Tuite AR
        • Greer AL
        An IDEA for short term outbreak projection: nearcasting using the basic reproduction number.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8: e83622
      48. 48.
        • Louz D
        • Bergmans HE
        • Loos BP
        • Hoeben RC
        Emergence of viral diseases: mathematical modeling as a tool for infection control, policy and decision making.
        Crit Rev Microbiol. 2010; 36: 195-211
      49. 49.
        Framework for verifying elimination of measles and rubella.
        Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2013; 88: 89-99
      50. 50.
        • Gidding HF
        • Martin NV
        • Stambos V
        • et al.
        Verification of measles elimination in Australia: Application of World Health Organization regional guidelines.
        J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2016; 6: 197-209
      51. 51.
        • De Serres G
        • Gay NJ
        • Farrington CP
        Epidemiology of transmissible diseases after elimination.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 151: 1039-1052
      View full text