Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T08:24:51.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Chipped Lithic Material in the Contemporary Maya Highlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Brian Hayden
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby 2, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
Margaret Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106

Abstract

Ethnoarchaeological work in the Mayan Highlands has revealed that some individuals continue to make and use chipped stone implements for the manufacture of manos and metates. As a result site formation processes, effects of resource distribution, and stone tool characteristics can still be studied. Chipped tools of industrial glass are also made and used in the area, and provide useful models for some of the prehistoric uses of flaked stone tools, as well as information relating to their storage, curation, discard, and learning contexts.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Binford, Lewis 1972 Model building—paradigms, and the current state of Paleolithic research. In An archaeological perspective, edited by Lewis Binford, pp. 244-294. Seminar Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis 1973 Interassemblage variability—the Mousterian and the ‘functional’ argument. In The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory, edited by Colin Renfrew, pp. 277-294. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis 1977 Forty-seven trips. In Stone tools as cultural markers, edited by Richard Wright, pp. 24-36. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.Google Scholar
Chapman, Richard C. 1977 Analysis of lithic assemblages. In Settlement and subsistence along the lower Chaco River: the CGP survey, edited by Charles Reher, pp. 371-452. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Cook, Scott 1973 Stone tools for steel-age Mexicans? Aspects of production in a Zapotec stone-working industry. American Anthropologist 75:1485-1503.Google Scholar
Culbert, Patrick 1974 The lost civilization: the story of the Classic Maya. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
Feldman, Lawrence 1973 Stones for the archaeologist. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 18.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent, and Marcus, Winter 1976 Analyzing household activities. In The early Mesoamerican village, edited by Kent Flannery, pp. 34-47. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Fowler, William S. 1945 Tool-making at the Westfield steatite quarry. American Antiquity 11:95-101.Google Scholar
Goodyear, Albert C. 1975 Hecla II and III: an interpretive study of archaeological remains from the Lakeshore Project, Papago Reservation, south central Arizona. Arizona State University Anthropological Research Papers 9.Google Scholar
Gould, Richard A. 1977 Ethno-archaeology; or, where do models come from? In Stone tools as cultural markers, edited by Richard, Wright, pp. 162-168. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian 1976a Australian Western Desert lithic technology: an ethno-archaeological study of variability in material culture. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian 1976b Curation: old and new. In Primitive art and technology, edited by Raymond, J. S., et al., pp. 47-59. University of Calgary Archaeological Association, Calgary.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian 1979 Paleolithic re/lections: lithic technology of the Western Desert Aborigines. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.Google Scholar
Heyerdahl, Thor 1958 Aku-aku: the secret of Easter Island. Rand McNally, New York.Google Scholar
Holmes, William H. 1897 Stone implements of the Potomac Chesapeake Tidewater Province. Bureau of American Ethnology, 15th Annual Report.Google Scholar
Holmes, William H. 1919 Handbook of Aboriginal American Antiquities. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 60.Google Scholar
Kramer, Carol (editor) 1979 Ethno-archaeology. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Munday, F. C. 1976 The Mousterian in the Negev: a description and explication of intersite variability. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University.Google Scholar
Parsons, Lee 1969 Bilbao, Guatemala (2 vols.). Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee.Google Scholar
Rathje, William 1972 Praise the gods and pass the metates. In Contemporary archaeology, edited by Mark Leone, pp. 365-392. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Rathje, William 1974 The garbage project. Archaeology 27:236-241.Google Scholar
Rathje, William 1978 Archaeological ethnography … because sometimes it is better to give than to receive. In Explorations in ethno-archaeology, edited by Richard A. Gould, pp. 49-76. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Sanders, William 1956 The Central Mexican symbiotic region: a study in prehistoric settlement patterns. In Prehistoric settlement patterns in the New World, edited by Gordon Willey, pp. 115-127. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 23.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. T., and Barbara, Price 1968 Mesoamerica: the evolution of a civilization. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael 1972 Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity 37:156-165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Muriel 1972 The Aztecs, Maya, and their predecessors. Seminar Press, New York.Google Scholar
Woodbury, Richard 1965 Artifacts of the Guatemalan Highlands. In Handbook of Middle American Indians: Vol. 2, Archaeology of Southern Mesoamerica, Part 1, edited by Robert, Wauchope and Gordon, Willey, pp. 163-179. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar