Construction of owner–manager identity in corporate social responsibility discourse
Merja Lähdesmäki
Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki, Seinäjoki, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorMerja Lähdesmäki
Ruralia Institute, University of Helsinki, Seinäjoki, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This article examines the different discursive resources on which small business owner–managers draw when understanding their sense of self in relation to corporate social responsibility. In the small business context, identity provides a justifiable framework to study corporate social responsibility, as decisions regarding socially responsible activities are mainly taken by managers and stem from their sense of who they are in the world. On the basis of 25 thematic interviews with owner–managers, two broad discursive resources were found that describe how they actively seek to create and legitimise their sense of self within the discussion on corporate social responsibility. These discursive resources are called being altruistic and being instrumental. The findings emphasise that the essential and also the most challenging feature in small business owner–managers' identity work is the process of reconciling economic values with the social and ethical aspects of business life.
References
- Abimbola, T. and Vallaster, C. 2007. ‘Brand, organisational identity and reputation in SMEs: an overview’. Qualitative Market Research, 10:4, 341–348.
10.1108/13522750710819685 Google Scholar
- Albert, S. and Whetten, D.A. 1985. ‘ Organizational identity’. In L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7: 263–295. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Alvesson, M. 2003. ‘Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: a reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research’. Academy of Management Review, 28:1, 13–33.
- Alvesson, M. and Kärreman, D. 2000. ‘Varieties of discourse: on the study of organizations through discourse analysis’. Human Relations, 53:9, 1125–1148.
- Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. 2002. ‘Identity regulation as organizational control: producing the appropriate individual’. Journal of Management Studies, 39:5, 619–644.
- Alvesson, M., Ashcraft, K.L. and Thomas, R. 2008. ‘Identity matters: reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies’. Organization, 15:1, 5–28.
- Arregle, J.-L., Hitt, M.A., Sirmon, D.G. and Very, P. 2007. ‘The development of organizational social capital: attributes of family firms’. Journal of Management Studies, 44:1, 73–95.
- Basu, K. and Palazzo, G. 2008. ‘Corporate social responsibility: a process model of sense-making’. Academy of Management Review, 33:1, 122–136.
- Beech, N. 2008. ‘On the nature of dialogic identity work’. Organization, 15:1, 51–74.
- Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. 1966. Social Construction of Knowledge: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday.
- Besser, T.L. 1999. ‘Community involvement and the perception of success among small business operators in small towns’. Journal of Small Business Management, 37:4, 16–30.
- Besser, T.L. and Miller, N.J. 2004. ‘The risks of enlightened self-interest: small businesses and support for community’. Business & Society, 43:4, 398–425.
10.1177/0007650304271140 Google Scholar
- Burton, B.K. and Dunn, C.P. 1996. ‘Feminist ethics as moral grounding for stakeholder theory’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6:2, 133–147.
10.2307/3857619 Google Scholar
- Cohen, L. and Musson, G. 2000. ‘Entrepreneurial identities: reflections from two case studies’. Organization, 7:1, 31–48.
- Coupland, C. and Brown, A.D. 2004. ‘Constructing organizational identities on the Web: a case study of Royal Dutch/Shell’. Journal of Management Studies, 41:8, 1325–1347.
- Cragg, W. 2002. ‘Business ethics and stakeholder theory’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12:2, 113–142.
- Crane, A. and Matten, D. 2004. Business Ethics: A European Perspective: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Deetz, S. 1996. ‘Describing differences in approaches to organization studies: rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy’. Organization Science, 7:2, 191–207.
- Dentchev, N.A. and Heene, A. 2004. ‘ Toward stakeholder responsibility and stakeholder motivation: systemic and holistic perspectives on corporate sustainability’. In S. Sharma and M. Starik (Eds.), Stakeholder, the Environment and Society. New Perspectives in Research on Corporate Sustainability: 117–139. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. 1995. ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications’. Academy of Management Review, 20:1, 65–91.
- Down, S. and Reveley, J. 2004. ‘Generational encounters and the social formation of entrepreneurial identity: “young guns” and “old farts” ’. Organization, 11:2, 233–250.
- European Commission. 2003. ‘ Recommendation 2003/361/EC’. Available at http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/enterprise/business_environment/n26026_en.htm (accessed 10 January 2011).
- Fournier, V. and Lightfoot, G. 1997. ‘ Identity work and family business’. In M. Ram, D. Deakins and D. Smallbone (Eds.), Small Firms. Enterprising Futures: 22–32. London: Paul Chapman.
- Friedman, M. 1970. ‘The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’. New York Times Magazine , 13 September: 122–126.
- Garriga, E. and Melé, D. 2004. ‘Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory’. Journal of Business Ethics, 53:1–2, 51–71.
- Goodpaster, K.E. 1991. ‘Business ethics and stakeholder analysis’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1:1, 53–73.
10.2307/3857592 Google Scholar
- Haigh, M. and Jones, M.T. 2006. ‘The drivers of corporate social responsibility: a critical review’. Business Review, 5:2, 245–251.
- Hardy, C. 2001. ‘Researching organizational discourse’. International Studies of Management and Organization, 31:3, 25–47.
10.1080/00208825.2001.11656819 Google Scholar
- Humphreys, M. and Brown, A.D. 2002. ‘Narratives of organizational identity and identification: a case study of hegemony and resistance’. Organization Studies, 23:3, 421–447.
- Hytti, U. 2003. ‘ Stories of entrepreneurs: narrative constructions of identities’. PhD Thesis, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Small Business Institute, Turku.
- Jenkins, H. 2006. ‘Small business champions for corporate social responsibility’. Journal of Business Ethics, 67:3, 241–256.
- Kärreman, D. and Alvesson, M. 2001. ‘Making newsmakers: conversational identity at work’. Organization Studies, 22:1, 59–89.
- Lepoutre, J. and Heene, A. 2006. ‘Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: a critical review’. Journal of Business Ethics, 67:3, 257–273.
- Moore, G. and Spence, L. 2006. ‘Editorial: responsibility and small business’. Journal of Business Ethics, 67:3, 219–226.
- Murillo, D. and Lozano, J.M. 2006. ‘SMEs and CSR: an approach to CSR in their own words’. Journal of Business Ethics, 67:3, 227–240.
- Oktar, L. 2001. ‘The ideological organization of representational processes in the presentation of us and them’. Discourse & Society, 12:3, 313–346.
- Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Perrini, F. 2006. ‘SMEs and CSR theory: evidence and implications from an Italian perspective’. Journal of Business Ethics, 67:3, 305–316.
- Peterson, R.A., Albaum, G. and Kozmetsky, G. 1986. ‘The public's definition of small business’. Journal of Small Business Management, 24:3, 63–68.
- Phillips, N. and Hardy, C. 1997. ‘Managing multiple identities: discourse, legitimacy, and resources in the UK refugee system’. Organization, 4:2, 159–186.
- Quinn, J.J. 1997. ‘Personal ethics and business ethics: the ethical attitudes of owner/managers of small business’. Journal of Business Ethics, 16:2, 119–127.
- Rapley, T.J. 2001. ‘The art(fullness) of open-ended interviewing: some considerations on analysing interviews’. Qualitative Research, 1:3, 303–323.
10.1177/146879410100100303 Google Scholar
- Rhodes, C. 2000. ‘ “Doing” knowledge at work, dialogue, monologue and power in organizational learning’. In J. Garrick and C. Rhodes (Eds.), Research and Knowledge at Work: 217–231. London: Routledge.
- Rose, N. 1989. Governing the Soul, the Shaping of Private Self. London: Routledge.
- Scott, S.G. and Lane, V.R. 2000. ‘A stakeholder approach to organizational identity’. Academy of Management Review, 25:1, 43–62.
- Spence, L.J. 1999. ‘Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics’. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8:3, 163–174.
10.1111/1467-8608.00144 Google Scholar
- Spence, L.J. 2004. ‘ Small firm accountability and integrity’. In G.G. Brenkert (Ed.), Corporate Integrity & Accountability: 115–128. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.4135/9781452225685.n10 Google Scholar
- Spence, L.J. 2007. ‘CSR and small business in a European policy context: the five “C”s of CSR and small business research agenda’. Business and Society Review, 112:4, 533–552.
10.1111/j.1467-8594.2007.00308.x Google Scholar
- Spence, L.J. and Rutherfoord, R. 2001. ‘Social responsibility, profit maximisation and the small firm owner–manager’. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 8:2, 126–139.
10.1108/EUM0000000006818 Google Scholar
- Stanworth, M.J.K. and Curran, J. 1976. ‘Growth and the small firm – an alternative view’. Journal of Management Studies, 13:2, 95–110.
- Sveningsson, S. and Alvesson, M. 2003. ‘Managing managerial identities: organizational fragmentation, discourse and identity struggle’. Human Relations, 56:10, 1163–1193.
- Talja, S. 1999. ‘Analyzing qualitative interview data: the discourse analytic method’. Library and Information Science Research, 21:4, 459–477.
- Thomas, R. and Davies, A. 2005. ‘Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: new public management and managerial identities in the UK public services’. Organization Studies, 26:5, 683–706.
- Thomas, R. and Linstead, A. 2002. ‘Losing the plot? Middle managers and identity’. Organization, 9:1, 71–93.
- Van Gelderen, M. and Jansen, P. 2006. ‘Autonomy as a start-up motive’. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13:1, 23–32.
10.1108/14626000610645289 Google Scholar
- Velasquez, M.G. 1982. Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Vesper, K. 1990. New Venture Strategies, revised edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Vyakarnam, S., Bailey, A., Myers, A. and Burnett, D. 1997. ‘Towards understanding of ethical behaviour in small firms’. Journal of Business Ethics, 16:15, 1625–1636.
- Watson, T.J. 1994. In Search of Management. London: Routledge.
- Werner, A. and Spence, L.J. 2004. ‘ Literature review: social capital and SMEs’. In L.J. Spence, A. Habisch and R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Responsibility and Social Capital: The World of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: 7–24. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Wetherell, M. and Potter, J. 1992. Mapping the Language of Racism. Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
- Windsor, D. 2006. ‘Corporate social responsibility: three key approaches’. Journal of Management Studies, 43:1, 93–114.
- Worthington, I., Ram, M. and Jones, T. 2006. ‘ “Giving something back”: a study of corporate social responsibility in UK South Asian small enterprises’. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15:1, 95–108.
10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00432.x Google Scholar