Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published March 1998

Social Defenses Against Organizational Learning

Abstract

It is argued that for organizational learning to occur maladaptive social defenses within the organization have to be altered. The origins of the concept of social defenses are traced through the work of Jaques and Menzies. A new concept of "system domain," and related concepts of "system domain fabric," and "system domain defenses," are proposed in order to account for the difficulties in sustaining organizational change in organizations that share a similar primary task. "Organizational learning" is defined as occurring when there is co-evolution of "organizational container" and "contained." The article distills variables from three successful consultancy/action research projects which are characteristic of organizations that are learning, and it is hypothesized that the creation of "organizational awareness" is necessary for organizational learning to occur.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

3. This work is increasingly being referred to as "socio-analysis," i.e., the activity of exploration, consultancy, and action research that combines and synthesizes methodologies derived from psychoanalysis, group relations theory, social systems thinking, social dreaming, and organizational behavior.
4. Quoted in Menzies Lyth, I. E. P. Containing anxiety in institutions. London: Free Association Books, 1988, p. 89.
5. Ibid., p. 94.
6. Ibid., p. 107.
7. The social defenses Menzies described were widespread in U.K. hospitals at the time (and indeed still persist in varying forms in Australian hospitals in the 1990s). When people move from one local institution within a system domain to another, in this case from hospital to hospital, they carry with them their "System Domain in the Mind" to the new institution, which is likely to include the current system domain defenses. Unless there are concurrent shifts in significant domain fabric factors, such as authority systems, policies and procedures, professional training, and system domain culture, changes in a local institution are likely to be eroded over time. The more positive aspect of this is that where local change has been successful the people involved become the carriers for these ideas into other institutions. The concept of the "System Domain in the Mind" is a development of Pierre Turquet's original concept of the "Institution in the Mind" (see Lawrence, 1986).
8. See Bain, A., Long, S., & Ross, S., Paper houses: The authority vacuum in a government school. Australian institute of social analysis report, Melbourne: Collins Dove, 1992, p. 6.
9. Besides sharing a similar primary task the school also shared with other Victorian public secondary schools a similar authority system at the level of the school, the same accountabilities to a Council, Region, and Department, the same selection and deselection procedures for staff, curriculum areas (within which there were some choices), teacher training, trade union authority and membership, pay and conditions, funding arrangements, and a "system domain in the mind," i.e., the system domain fabric.
10. See Lawrence, W. G. Understanding organizational life. In G. P. Chattopadhyay, Z. H. Gangjee, M. L. Hunt, and W. G. Lawrence (Eds.), When the twain meet. Allahabad: A. H. Wheeler & Co., Private Limited, p. 59.
11. There is a large literature on organizational learning much of which is concerned with cognitive tearning at the expense of emotional learning. For a recent article that reviews (in the main) the cognitive learning approach to organizational learning see Martin B. Meznar and Davide Nicolini, The social construction of organizational learning: Conceptual and practical issues in the field. Human Relations, 1995, 48(7).
12. The concept of "container" and "contained" was developed by Wilfred Bion. See Bion, W. R. Attention and interpretation. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd., 1970, Chap. 7, pp. 72-82.
13. The long-term success of this project could not be assessed as a decision was made by the Victorian State Government (during the project) to close the prison. The prison is scheduled to finally close its doors in 1997.
14. See Bain, A. The Baric experiment: The design of jobs and organization for the expression and growth of human capacity. Tavistock Institute Occasional Paper. No. 4, 1982. This project that formed part of a 10-year engagement with the computer bureau took place 1974-1976 with reviews of the experiment in 1976, 1977, 1978, 1980, and 1982.
15. See Bain, A., & Barnett, L. The Design of a Day Care System in a Nursery Setting for Children Under Five. Tavistock Institute Occasional Paper, No. 8, 1986. This project, which took place between 1976 and 1979 had the aim of designing and implementing an optimum system of day nursery care for children under five.
16. This 1-year change management program took place in 1993 and 1994 with a review one year later in 1995.
17. Managing Director of Baric, Officer in Charge of the Day Nursery, Governor of Pentridge.
18. For a description of this process, see Bain, A. The Basic experiment, Chapter 7, Work culture analysis.
19. The main threat to this process of evolution focused around the difficulty for the wider management culture (not involved in the experiment) understanding and accepting the principles of the experiment. Even though productivity had risen 34%, labor turnover had been reduced from 110% to 24%, revenue per operator had been increased by 2000 pounds a year, three levels of managerial hierarchy had been removed, and job satisfaction and morale was very high among the operators, given all this there were still attempts by managers to turn back a successful self-managing team structure to a conventional management hierarchy with section supervisors, etc. This was successfully resisted.
20. To manage input, transformation, and output processes.
21. While system domain factors were not significant in the Baric example, nevertheless the CEO's active support of the evolution of the experiment was vital in preventing its erosion through the reassertion of traditional management practices and culture.
22. In the Baric Experiment, for example, there were three major changes to the project organization that came about through learning as it developed.

References

BAIN, A. The Baric Experiment: The Design of Jobs and Organization for the Expression and Growth of Human Capacity. Tavistock Institute Occasional Paper. No. 4, 1982.
BAIN, A., & BARNETT, L. The Design of a Day Care System in a Nursery Setting for Children Under Five. Tavistock Institute Occasional Paper, No. 8, 1986.
BAIN, A., LONG, S., & ROSS, S. Paper Houses: The Authority Vacuum in a Government School. Australian Institute of Social Analysis Report, Collins Dove, Melbourne, 1992, p. 6-6.
BION, W. R. Attention and interpretation. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd., 1970.
FREUD, S. Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In J. Strachey, (Ed.), The standard edition of the works of Sigmund Freud Vol XVIII, London: The Hogarth Press, 1955.
GILMORE, T., & KRANTZ, J. The splitting of leadership and management as a social defence. Human Relations, 1990, 43(2).
JAQUES, E. Social systems as a defence against persecutory and depressive anxiety. In M. Klein, P. Heimann, and R. Money-Kyrle (Eds.), New directions in psycho-analysis. London: Iavistock Publications, 1955.
KLEIN, M. The psychoanalysis of children. London, 1932.
KLEIN, M. Contributions to psychoanalysis. London, 1948.
KLEIN, M. Developments in psychoanalysis. London, 1952.
LAWRENCE, W. G. Understanding organizational life. In G. P. Chattopadhyay, Z. H. Gangjee, M. L. Hunt, and W G. Lawrence (Eds.), When the twain meet. Allahabad: A. H. Wheeler & Co., Private Limited, 1986, p. 59-59.
MEZNAR, M. B., & NICOLINI, D. The social construction of organizational learning: Conceptual and practical issues in the field. Human Relations, 1995, 48(7).
MENZIES, I. E. P. The functioning of social systems against anxiety: A report on a study of the nursing service of a general hospital. London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, 1970.
MENZIES LYTH, I. E. P. Containing anxiety in institutions. London: Free Association Books, 1988, p. 89-89.
SENGE, P. M. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Sydney: Random House Australia Pty. Ltd., 1992.
TRIST, E. The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Action Research Program. Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre Occasional Paper, No. 2, Canada, 1981.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: March 1998
Issue published: March 1998

Keywords

  1. social defenses
  2. organizational learning
  3. system domain
  4. system domain defenses
  5. organizational awareness
  6. action research

Rights and permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alastair Bain
P.O. Box 293, Carlton South, Victoria 3053, Australia.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Human Relations.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 354

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 68 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 47

  1. South African student leaders' role experience through social dream dr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The work is alive! Systems psychodynamics and the pursuit of pluralism...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Leading change in health care: the challenge of anxiety
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Advancing Research on Team Learning by Taking into Account Complexity,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The idealization of ‘compassion’ in trainee nurses’ talk: A psychosoci...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Organizational Learning and Change
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Explaining the Persistence of Gender Inequality: The Work–family Narra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Qualitative Arbeits-, Organisations- und Wirtschaftspsychologie
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Institutional Illogics: The Unconscious and Institutional Analysis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Dilemmas and Conflicts of Various Professional Roles within a Human Se...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. The critical moment of transition: Staying with and acting on newly ga...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Bibliographie
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Organizational Identity: An Ambiguous Concept in Practical Terms
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Collaborative learning processes in the context of a public health pro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. From real life to real life: bringing ‘double awareness’ from Action L...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Work as affective experience: The contribution of Christophe Dejours’ ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Organizational Learning and Change
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Organizational blind spots: Splitting, blame and idealization in the N...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Organizational learning in the P hilippine...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Power, politics & learning: a social enactment of the SME owner/manage...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Parent company benefits from reverse knowledge transfer: The role of t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. That Unwanted Feeling: A Psychodynamic Study of Disappointment in Orga...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. The Contribution of Psychoanalysis to Organization Studies and Managem...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. The systems psychodynamic experiences of first-year master’s students...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. The Psychological Implications of Stakeholder Involvement in Social En...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. The spatial psychodynamics of management learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Latenzschutz und Veränderungswiderstand
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Why do public policies fail so often? Exploring health policy-making a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. SOCIAL DEFENCES AND TWENTY‐FIRST CENTURY ORGANIZATIONS
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Barriers to organizational learning: An integration of theory and rese...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Working with stories: diverse tales of organizational life
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Delinquency in the Mind of an Organization
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Playing tick-box games: Interrelating defences in professional apprais...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Choice is yours: A psychodynamic exploration of health policymaking an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Organization Learning in Non-writing Communities...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Service design, culture and performance: Collusion and co-production i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Introducing the Learning Practice – I. The characteristics of Learning...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Risk Management: the Talking Cure
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. LA ORGANIZACIÓN Y LA ESTRATEGIA: PREFERENCIAS DEL ESTRATEGA O IMPERATI...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Examining the relationships between individual, team and organizationa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Systemic Exchange: Responsibility for Angst
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Organizations, management and psychoanalysis: an overview
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Organisational defences revisited: systems and contexts
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. The Learning Organization: Foucauldian Gloom or Utopian Sunshine?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Adaptation to creation: progress of organizational learning and increa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Organizational learning through the process of enhancing information s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub