Abstract
Hybridization is common and important to the adaptive evolution of plants. Hybridization has resulted in the formation of new species and the introgression of traits between species. This paper discusses the advantages of using hybrid systems to explore the evolution of tolerance to herbivore damage (i.e., the ability to diminish the negative effects of damage on fitness). The major consequence of hybridization likely to make it influential for tolerance evolution is that hybridization generates broad variation in traits that can be selected for or against. In addition to generating greater variation in tolerance to damage and its putative traits (e.g., traits associated with allocation patterns and meristem production), hybridization can generate greater independence among tolerance traits and between tolerance and defense traits. Greater independence may provide a greater ability to discern mechanisms of tolerance, give a greater probability of detecting allocation costs of tolerance, and provide an effective means to evaluate tradeoffs between tolerance and defense. Interspecific hybrid systems can also be used to evaluate the importance of co-adaptation of tolerance traits. Moreover, recombinant hybrids can be used in selection studies focusing on tolerance to damage to discern whether parental combinations of tolerance traits are favored over novel combinations. Research in hybrid systems that investigate the selective importance of tolerance, the patterns of inheritance of tolerance traits, and the genetic architecture of plant species involved can be vital to our evaluation of the adaptive role of tolerance to damage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, E. (1939) Recombination in species crosses. Genetics 24, 668-698.
Arendt, J.D. (1997) Adaptive intrinsic growth rates: an integration across taxa. Quart. Rev. Biol. 72, 149-177.
Arnold, M.L. (1997) Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
Arnold, M.L. and Hodges, S.A. (1995) Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends in Ecol. Evol. 10, 67-71.
Barber, L.D., Joern, B.C., Volenec, J.J. and Cunningham, S.M. (1996) Supplemental nitrogen effects on alfalfa regrowth and nitrogen mobilization from roots. Crop Sci. 36, 1217-1223.
Barton, N.H. and Hewitt, G.M. (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 113-148.
Berenbaum, M.R. and Zangerl, A.R. (1992) Quantification of chemical coevolution. In R.S. Fritz and E.L. Simms (eds) Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 69-90.
Brainerd, E. (1924) Some natural violet hybrids of North America. Vermont Agricultural Experimental Station, Bulletin No. 239.
Burdon, R.S. (1990a) Hybrid breakdown in physiological response: a mechanistic approach. Evolution 44, 1806-1813.
Burdon, R.S. (1990b) Hybrid breakdown in developmental time in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 44, 1814-1822.
Burke, J.M., Carney, S.E. and Arnold, M.L. (1998) Hybrid fitness in the Louisiana irises: analysis of parental and F1 performance. Evolution 52, 37-43.
Edmands, S. (1999) Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 53, 1757-1768.
Emms, S.K. and Arnold, M.L. (1997) The effect of habitat on parental and hybrid fitness: transplant experiments with Louisiana irises. Evolution 51, 1112-1119.
Endler, J.A. (1977) Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Fineblum, W.L. and Rausher, M.D. (1995) Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory. Nature 377, 517-520.
Fritz, R.S., Nichols-Orians, C.M. and Brunsfeld, S.J. (1994) Interspecific hybridization of plants and resistance to herbivores: hypotheses, genetics, and variable responses in a diverse herbivore community. Oecologia 97, 106-117.
Fritz, R.S., Roche, B.M. and Brunsfeld, S.J. (1998) Genetic variation in resistance of hybrid willows to herbivores. Oikos 83, 117-128.
Fritz, R.S., Roche, B.M., Brunsfeld, S.J. and Orians, C.M. (1996) Interspecific and temporal variation in herbivore responses to hybrid willows. Oecologia 108, 121-129.
Graham, J.H., Freeman, D.C. and McArthur, E.D. (1995) Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush, Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae). II. Selection gradients and hybrid fitness. Am. J. Bot. 82, 709-716.
Grant, V. (1981) Plant Speciation. Colombia University Press, New York.
Grant, P.R. and Grant, B.R. (1992) Hybridization of bird species. Science 256, 193-197.
Harrison, R.G. (ed.) (1993) Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process. Oxford University Press, New York.
Herms, D.A. and Mattson, W.J. (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quart. Rev. Biol. 67, 283-335.
Hewitt, G.M. (1988) Hybrid zones — natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends in Ecol. Evol. 3, 158-167.
Heywood, J.S. (1986) Clinal variation associated with edaphic ecotones in hybrid populations of Gaillardia pulchella. Evolution 40, 1132-1140.
Hochwender, C., Marquis, R. and Stowe, K. (2000) The potential for and constraints on the evolution of compensatory ability in Asclepias syriaca. Oecologia 122, 361-370.
Keim, P., Paige, K.N., Whitham, T.G. and Lark, K.G. (1989) Genetic analysis of an interspecific swarm of Populus: occurrence of unidirectional introgression. Genetics 123, 557-565.
Lewontin, R.C. and Birch, L.C. (1966) Hybridization as a source of variation for adaptation to new environments. Evolution 20, 315-336.
Louahlia, S., MacDuff, J.H., Ourry, A., Humphreys, M. and Boucaud, J. (1999) Nitrogen reserve status affects the dynamics of nitrogen remobilization and mineral nitrogen uptake during recovery of contrasting cultivars of Lolium perenne from defoliation. New Phytologist 142, 451-462.
Lynch, M. (1991) The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45, 622-629.
Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. (1998) Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
Manley, S.A.M. and Fowler, D.P. (1969) Spruce budworm defoliation in relation to introgression in red and black spruce. Forest Sci. 15, 365-366.
Marquis, R.J. (1992) The selective impact of herbivores. In R.S. Fritz and E.L. Simms (eds) Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 301-325.
Marquis, R.J., Newell, E.A. and Villegas, A.C. (1997) Non-structural carbohydrate accumulation and use in an understorey rain-forest shrub and relevance for the impact of leaf herbivory. Func. Ecol. 11, 636-643.
Mather, K. and Jinks, J.L. (1982) Introduction to Biometrical Genetics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
Mauricio, R. (2000) Natural selection and the joint evolution of tolerance and resistance as plant defenses. Evol. Ecol. 14, 491-507 (this issue).
Mauricio, R., Rausher M.D. and Burdick, D.S. (1997) Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78, 1301-1311.
Messina, F.J., Richards, J.H. and McArthur, E.D. (1996) Variable responses of insects to hybrid versus parental sagebrush in common gardens. Oecologia 107, 513-521.
Millar, C.V. (1983) A steep cline in Pinus muricata. Evolution 37, 311-319.
Orians, C.M. (2000) The effects of hybridization in plants on secondary chemistry: implications for the ecology and evolution of plants and herbivores. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1749-1756.
Orians, C.M. and Fritz, R.S. (1995) Secondary chemistry of hybrid and parental willows: phenolic glycosides and condensed tannins in Salix sericea, S. eriocephala, and their hybrids. J. Chem. Ecol. 21, 1245-1253.
Orians, C.M., Griffiths, M.E., Roche, B.M. and Fritz, R.S. (2000) Phenolic glycosides and condensed tannins in Salix sericea, S. eriocephala and their F1 hybrids: not all hybrids are created equal. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 28, 619-632.
Painter, R.H. (1968) Insect Resistance in Crop Plants. Macmillan, New York.
Philippi, T.E. (1993) Multiple regression: herbivory. In S.M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch (eds) Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 183-210.
Rieseberg, L.H. (1995) The role of hybridization in evolution: old wine in new skins. Am. J. Bot. 82, 944-953.
Rieseberg, L.H. and Carney, S.E. (1998) Plant hybridization. New Phytologist 140, 599-624.
Rieseberg, L.H. and Ellstrand, N.C. (1993) What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12, 213-241.
Rieseberg, L.H., Sinervo, B., Linder, C.R., Ungerer, M.C. and Arias, D.M. (1996) Role of gene interactions in hybrid speciation: evidence from ancient and experimental hybrids. Science 272, 741-745.
Rieseberg, L.H. and Wendel, J.F. (1993) Introgression and its consequences in plants. In R. Harrison (ed.) Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 70-109.
Roy, B.A. and Kirchner, J.W. (2000) Evolutionary dynamics of pathogen resistance and tolerance. Evolution 54, 51-63.
Scarascia-Mugnozza, G.E., Ceulemans, R., Heilman, P.E., Isebrands, J.G., Stettler, R.F. and Hinckley, T.M. (1997) Production physiology and morphology of Populus species and their hybrids grown under short rotation. II. Biomass components and harvest index of hybrid and parental species clones. Can. J. Forest Res. 27, 285-294.
Scarascia-Mugnozza, G.E., Hinckley, T.M., Stettler, R.F., Heilman, P.E. and Isebrands, J.G. (1999) Production physiology and morphology of Populus species and their hybrids grown under short rotation. III. Seasonal carbon allocation patterns from branches. Can. J. Forest Res. 27, 285-294.
Simms, E.L. (1992) Costs of plant resistance to herbivory. In R.S. Fritz and E.L. Simms (eds) Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 392-425.
Simms, E.L. and Triplett, J. (1994) Costs and benefits of plant responses to disease: resistance and tolerance. Evolution 48, 1973-1985.
Smith, C.M. (1989) Plant Resistance to Insects: A Fundamental Approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Stace, C.A. (1987) Hybridization and the plant species. In K.M. Urbanska (ed.) Differentiation Patterns in Higher Plants. Academic Press, New York, pp. 115-127.
Stebbins, G.L. (1959) The role of hybridization in evolution. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 103, 231-251.
Stebbins, G.L. (1973) Flowering Plants: Evolution above the Species Level. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Stowe, K.A. (1998) Experimental evolution of resistance in Brassica rapa: correlated response of tolerance in lines selected for glucosinolate content. Evolution 52, 703-712.
Stowe, K.A., Marquis, R.J., Hochwender, C.G. and Simms, E.L. (2000) The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 565-595.
Stutz, H.C. and Thomas, L.K. (1964) Hybridization and introgression in Cowania and Purshia. Evolution 18, 183-195.
Tiffin, P. (2000) Are tolerance, avoidance, and antibiosis evolutionarily and ecologically equivalent responses of plants to herbivores? Am. Nat. 155, 128-138.
Tiffin, P. and Rausher, M.D. (1999) Genetic constraints and selection acting on tolerance to herbivory in the common morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. Am. Nat. 154, 700-716.
Wang, H., McArthur, E.D., Sanderson, S.C., Graham, J.H. and Freeman, D.C. (1997) Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata: Asteraceae). IV. Reciprocal transplant experiments. Evolution 51, 95-102.
Wu, H.X., Ying, C.C. and Muir, J.A. (1996) Effect of geographic variation and jack pine introgression on disease and insect resistance in lodgepole pine. Can. J. Forest Res. 26, 711-726.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hochwender, C.G., Fritz, R.S. & Orians, C.M. Using hybrid systems to explore the evolution of tolerance to damage. Evolutionary Ecology 14, 509–521 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010846514418
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010846514418