Forest
The Forests and biodiversity in UP are important in many ways: as source of fuel and fodder, as source if industrial inputs, habitat for thousands of plant and animal species, as carbon sink, and as a protective cover for its soils. Forests are also important as they provide several ecosystem services. Bifurcation of Uttaranchal State from UP in 2000 has reduced the number of ecological zones in UP to three (Terai, the Gangetic plains, Vindhyan rages) from the earlier six. There are three major forest types in UP viz. tropical moist deciduous, tropical dry deciduous and tropical thorn forests. These forests are spread over in the Northern, Northeastern and Southern parts of the state. While the Terai region has mostly moist tropical forests of sal, Eastern UP has dry deciduous mixed forest, Eastern and Western UP generally have teak or mixed forest, and the Budelkhand region is covered widely with thorny scrub forests.
Miscellaneous Statistics
Comparative Picture of recorded forest area in previous Years in U.P. Economic regionwise geographical area, recored forest area, covered forest area (1998-99) and population (1991) in U.P.
Region |
Geographical area |
Recored forest area |
Covered Forest area |
Population ('000') |
Total |
Under Forest Deptt. |
Total |
Per Sq. Km. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Uttranchal % |
53,343 |
34,985 |
24,312 |
22,658 |
7,051 |
132 |
Uttranchal % |
|
65.58 |
45.58 |
42.58 |
- |
- |
Paschime % |
80,226 |
3,701 |
3,672 |
2,595 |
48,423 |
604 |
Western % |
|
4.61 |
4.58 |
3.23 |
- |
- |
Kendriy % |
45,808 |
2,343 |
2,343 |
1,432 |
24,187 |
528 |
Central % |
|
5.11 |
5.11 |
3.13 |
- |
- |
Poorvi % |
85,586 |
8,803 |
8,773 |
5,714 |
52,722 |
616 |
Eastern % |
|
10.29 |
10.25 |
6.68 |
- |
- |
Bundelkhand % |
29.478 |
2,298 |
2,276 |
1,595 |
6,729 |
228 |
Bundelkhand% |
|
7.79 |
7.72 |
5.41 |
- |
- |
Yog % |
294,441 |
52,129 |
41,376 |
34,050 |
139,112 |
472 |
Total % |
|
17.70 |
14.05 |
11.56 |
- |
- |
Source: http://envfor.nic.in
- Forest > Status
Forest and Tree Cover
According to official statistics, forests in UP occupy 7 percent of geographical area. After the bifurcation of the state into up and Uttarachal, per captia forest and tree cover is 0.01 ha where as the national average is 0.06 ha. Sixteen to the 70 districts in UP account for most (75.7%) of forest area. These sixteen Districts account for only 25.7 percent of states geographical area, but have 71.7 percent of dense forest and 83.2 percent of states scrub land. As these figures suggest, these districts are of high priority concern for forest and biodiversity conservation in the state.
Year |
% age of forest area to total reported area |
|
Uttar Pradesh |
All India |
1950-51 |
10.9 |
14.2 |
1960-61 |
12.9 |
18.1 |
1970-71 |
16.6 |
21.0 |
1980-81 |
17.2 |
22.2 |
1990-91 |
17.3 |
22.3 |
2000-01 |
17.5
(1999-00) |
22.6
(1999-00) |
Source: http://planning.up.nic.in
Legal status, dense and open forests
The latest satellite imagery data (FSI, 2001) shows that UP actually has only 13746 km2 under forest cover which is 5.7 percent of states geographical area. As per legal categorization7, 65.9 percent of the forest area is reserved forest, 14.4 percent is protected forest and 19.7 percent is unclassified forest. The dense forest cover (canopy over over 40%) is estimated at 8965 km2 and the rest is open forest with canopy cover less than 40 percent.
Expenditure and Revenue From Forests
During 1996-97, forests in UP produced 185737 cubic meters of timber, 53483 tons of fuel wood and 166120 tons of tendu leaves (used to wrap bidi, a traditional type of cigarette. Expenditure on forest conservation is higher than the direct economic benefits derived from major forest product. However, it is to be noted that the revenue estimates do not take into account the benefits derived by the poor from forests and also do not capture the ecosystem service benefits provided by them.
Forest Cover and Protected Areas in UP
Geographical area of UP |
240928 km2 |
Recorded forest area |
16986 km2 |
Forest cover (assessed through satellite imagery) |
13746 km2 |
Tree cover in culturable non forest areas |
7545 km2 |
Total forest and tree cover |
21291 km2 |
Percent forest area to geographical area |
7 |
Percent forest cover to geographical area |
5.7 |
Percent forest and tree cover to geographical area |
8.8 |
National Parks |
1 |
Wildlife Sanctuaries |
23 |
Source: Environment Monitor, Uttar Pradesh
District-wise Forest Cover (Uttar Pradesh)
Number of Districts: 70
District |
Geographic Area |
Forest Cover |
Very Dense |
Moderately Dense |
Open Forest |
Total Forest |
Percent |
Change |
Agra |
4,027 |
- |
74 |
199 |
273 |
6.78 |
16 |
Aligarh |
3,650 |
- |
6 |
49 |
55 |
1.51 |
14 |
Allahabad |
5,137 |
- |
28 |
69 |
97 |
1.89 |
-64 |
Ambedkar Nagar |
2,337 |
- |
2 |
32 |
34 |
1.45 |
-185 |
Azamgarh |
4,234 |
`- |
1 |
30 |
31 |
0.73 |
-15 |
Bagpat |
1,321 |
- |
4 |
11 |
15 |
1.14 |
-3 |
Bahraich & Shravasti |
6,878 |
210 |
294 |
347 |
851 |
12.37 |
-58 |
Balrampur |
3,349 |
144 |
253 |
135 |
532 |
15.89 |
35 |
Balia |
2,981 |
- |
- |
23 |
23 |
0.77 |
13 |
Banda |
4,532 |
- |
27 |
76 |
103 |
2.27 |
-80 |
Barabanki |
4,402 |
- |
4 |
82 |
86 |
1.95 |
-4 |
Bareilly |
4,120 |
- |
7 |
36 |
43 |
1.04 |
9 |
Basti |
2,688 |
- |
6 |
12 |
18 |
0.67 |
13 |
Bijnore |
4,561 |
42 |
252 |
129 |
423 |
9.27 |
36 |
Badaun |
5,168 |
- |
16 |
26 |
42 |
0.81 |
12 |
Bulandshahar |
2,910 |
- |
35 |
81 |
116 |
3.99 |
32 |
Chandauli |
2,549 |
- |
190 |
327 |
519 |
20.36 |
44 |
Chitrakoot |
3,092 |
- |
346 |
208 |
554 |
17.92 |
73 |
Deoria |
2,538 |
- |
1 |
16 |
17 |
0.67 |
1 |
Etah |
4,446 |
- |
8 |
81 |
89 |
2.00 |
-9 |
Etawa |
2,311 |
- |
46 |
139 |
185 |
8.01 |
-12 |
Faizabad |
2,174 |
- |
5 |
51 |
56 |
2.58 |
11 |
Farrukhabad |
2,181 |
- |
13 |
32 |
45 |
2.06 |
9 |
Fatehpur |
4,152 |
- |
6 |
36 |
42 |
1.01 |
-12 |
Firozabad |
2,361 |
- |
5 |
39 |
44 |
1.86 |
1 |
Gautam Buddh Nagar |
1,442 |
- |
12 |
23 |
35 |
2.43 |
18 |
Ghaziabad |
2,590 |
- |
17 |
26 |
43 |
1.66 |
-73 |
Ghazipur |
3,377 |
- |
4 |
43 |
47 |
1.39 |
31 |
Gonda |
4,003 |
1 |
59 |
47 |
107 |
2.67 |
-4 |
Gorakhpur |
3,321 |
- |
40 |
25 |
65 |
1.96 |
27 |
Hamirpur |
4,282 |
- |
67 |
111 |
178 |
4.16 |
47 |
Hardoi |
5,986 |
- |
7 |
118 |
125 |
2.09 |
44 |
Hathras |
1,840 |
- |
1 |
24 |
25 |
1.36 |
-5 |
Jyotiba Phule Nagar |
2,249 |
- |
30 |
52 |
82 |
3.65 |
6 |
Jalaun |
4,565 |
- |
68 |
179 |
247 |
5.41 |
11 |
Jaunpur |
4,038 |
- |
13 |
42 |
55 |
1.36 |
19 |
Jhansi |
5,024 |
- |
34 |
168 |
202 |
4.02 |
26 |
Kannauj |
2,093 |
- |
- |
29 |
29 |
1.39 |
19 |
Kanpur Nagar & Dehat |
6,176 |
- |
16 |
97 |
113 |
1.83 |
-105 |
Kaushambi |
2,124 |
- |
9 |
22 |
31 |
1.46 |
28 |
Kheri |
7,680 |
366 |
502 |
446 |
1,314 |
17.11 |
-149 |
Kushinagar |
2,906 |
- |
4 |
30 |
34 |
1.17 |
25 |
Lalitpur |
5,039 |
- |
146 |
426 |
572 |
11.35 |
14 |
Lucknow |
2,528 |
- |
115 |
183 |
298 |
11.79 |
169 |
Maharajganj |
2,952 |
202 |
141 |
118 |
461 |
15.62 |
17 |
Mahoba |
2,884 |
- |
20 |
74 |
94 |
3.26 |
12 |
Mainpuri |
2,760 |
- |
1 |
15 |
16 |
0.58 |
-33 |
Mathura |
3,340 |
- |
7 |
54 |
61 |
1.83 |
8 |
Mau |
1,713 |
- |
1 |
17 |
18 |
1.05 |
15 |
Meerut |
2,590 |
- |
30 |
32 |
62 |
2.39 |
-110 |
Mirzapur |
4,521 |
- |
316 |
466 |
782 |
17.30 |
151 |
Moradabad |
3,718 |
- |
4 |
21 |
25 |
0.67 |
8 |
Muzaffarnagar |
4,008 |
- |
13 |
27 |
40 |
1.00 |
0 |
Oraiya |
2,015 |
- |
10 |
59 |
69 |
3.42 |
-2 |
Piliphit |
3,499 |
290 |
204 |
203 |
697 |
19.92 |
13 |
Pratapgarh |
3,717 |
- |
28 |
67 |
95 |
2.56 |
57 |
Rai Bareli |
4,609 |
- |
6 |
91 |
97 |
2.10 |
34 |
Rampur |
2,367 |
3 |
20 |
49 |
72 |
3.04 |
-13 |
Saharanpur |
3,689 |
- |
147 |
224 |
371 |
10.06 |
82 |
Sant Kabir Nagar |
1,646 |
- |
- |
2 |
2 |
0.12 |
2 |
Sant Ravidas Nagar |
1,015 |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
0.10 |
1 |
Shahjahanpur |
4,575 |
20 |
54 |
44 |
118 |
2.58 |
9 |
Siddharth Nagar |
2,895 |
- |
10 |
29 |
39 |
1.35 |
-35 |
Sitapur |
5,743 |
- |
15 |
201 |
216 |
3.76 |
-132 |
Sonbhadra |
6,788 |
17 |
846 |
1,606 |
2,469 |
36.37 |
-28 |
Sultanpur |
4,436 |
- |
18 |
157 |
175 |
3.94 |
87 |
Unnao |
4,558 |
- |
34 |
197 |
231 |
5.07 |
193 |
Varanasi |
1,528 |
- |
1 |
11 |
12 |
0.79 |
11 |
Total |
240,928 |
1,297 |
4,699 |
8,122 |
14,118 |
5.86 |
372 |
Source: http://envfor.nic.in
Major forested districts of UP in 2001 (area in sq.km)
District 1 |
Geographical Area
2 |
Dense forest
3 |
Open Forest
4 |
Total (3+4) 5 |
As % of 2 6 |
Scrub 7 |
Sonbhadra |
6788 |
1221 |
1276 |
2497 |
36.79 |
51 |
Kheri |
7680 |
1113 |
350 |
1463 |
19.05 |
1 |
Bahraich |
6878 |
642 |
267 |
909 |
13.22 |
15 |
Philibhit |
3499 |
488 |
196 |
684 |
19.55 |
0 |
Mirzapur |
4521 |
198 |
433 |
631 |
13.96 |
33 |
Lalitpur |
5039 |
231 |
327 |
558 |
11.07 |
55 |
Balrampur |
3349 |
437 |
60 |
497 |
14.84 |
2 |
Gorakhpur |
3321 |
385 |
97 |
482 |
14.51 |
0 |
Chitrkoot |
3092 |
301 |
180 |
481 |
15.56 |
39 |
Chandauli |
2549 |
186 |
289 |
475 |
18.63 |
7 |
Bijnor |
4561 |
311 |
76 |
387 |
8.48 |
4 |
Sitapur |
5743 |
332 |
16 |
348 |
6.06 |
2 |
Saharanpur |
3689 |
151 |
138 |
289 |
7.83 |
0 |
Agra |
4027 |
112 |
145 |
257 |
6.38 |
56 |
Jalaun |
4565 |
109 |
127 |
236 |
5.17 |
46 |
Ambedkar Nagar |
2337 |
219 |
0 |
219 |
9.37 |
0 |
Total for 16 districts |
71638 |
6436 |
3977 |
10413 |
|
311 |
Source: Environment Monitor, Uttar Pradesh
Causes For Forest Loss And Degradation:
UP has just over 7 percent of land area under forests, compared to about 23 percent in the country. The stated goal of MoEF is to bring 33 percent of Indias land area under forest and tree cover. UP needs more forests to provide sufficient ecosystem services. Moreover, intensive agricultural practices, increasing demand for fuel wood, fodder, non timber forest product (NTFP) and conversion of forest land for development purposed lead to forest loss and habitat fragmentation and degradation.
Increasing demand for timber
Timber demand in UP has increased by 59 percent (from 3.65 million cu.m in 1988 to 5.81 million cu.m in 2001) and is expected to increase at the same rate during the next decade and a half. However, timber productivity is falling and much more forestland will be required even to maintain the current levels of supply.
Increasing livestock pressure
Land, forests and biological resources are under pressure from increasing livestock. The livestock population in undivided UP rose from 63 million in 1982 to around 75 million by 1993. The estimated livestock population of UP (excluding Uttaranchal) is around 65.2 million in 2001. Table 18 shows that on average there are more than 270 livestock per sq. km in UP and the highest density of livestock population is in the Western region (300) and the lowest in is Bundelkhand region. Table 19 gives a more precise measure of livestock density by focusing on the livestock numbers and the area under pasture/other grazing lands. The Eastern region remains the most pressurised region but the growth of pressure has been highest in Western UP over that last 25 years.
Livestock population trends in undivided UP (million)
Livestock/Poultry |
1982 |
1988 |
% Annual growth |
1993 |
% Annual growth |
Cattle |
26.15 |
26.3 |
0.11 |
25.63 |
-0.51 |
Buffalo |
15.78 |
18.25 |
3.13 |
20.08 |
2.01 |
Sheep |
2.3 |
2.18 |
-1.04 |
2.4 |
2.02 |
Goat |
9.68 |
11.32 |
3.39 |
13.1 |
3.14 |
Poultry Others |
9.13 |
11.8 |
5.85 |
13.68 |
3.19 |
Total |
63.04 |
69.85 |
2.16 |
74.89 |
1.44 |
Source: Environment Monitor, Uttar Pradesh
OBSERVATIONS & INTERVENTIONS:
- Forest cover in U.P. at present is abysmally low, effective dense cover being under 4%. For meeting human and animal needs, sustaining agricultural growth, maintaining ecological balance, preserving soil health and improving water regimes this cover needs to be increased to at least 20% over next two decades.
- The State has nearly 7.4 million ha of various types of degraded lands which include ravines and usar, water-logged, riverine and other soil erosion affected lands. A substantial part of these can and should be recovered for tree cover and grasslands.
- Protecting existing forest cover and increasing its density should be high priority areas of policy and action. Greater efforts are needed for preventing forest fires.
- Social forestry, farm forestry and tree planting on road, river rail and canal banks can substantially increase tree cover.
- Operation Green needs to be more vigorously and intensively implemented.
- While JFM has, in principle been accepted as a strong policy component, its ground level progress is still slow, halting and limited in reach. Similarly Forest Development Agencies have yet to be activised and made effective. A wide-based participative people centred approach, accepted as policy, remains to be operationalised. JFM needs to be strengthened and consolidated through expanding group number networking them for experience sharing and ensuring ad3equated benefit sharing. Womens participation is a must for JFM success.
- Production levels of many types of forest product have been falling while euclyptus, and shisham have recorded increases fall is considerable in teak, khair, sal fuel wood, bamboo and bhaber grass. Productivity is low both in major and minor forest products.
- Protection of wild life must remain an area of high priority.
- Traditional knowledge and skills need to be documented and this information disseminated.
- Grazing must be regulated in terms of capacities and sustained grassland yields.
- R & D inputs need to be organized, improved and consolidated and their effective uses at the field level ensured. Forest administration must shift from revenue and regulation to extension and stake-holder participation orientation.
- Forest data accuracy in time series modes is important for medium and long term forestry planning. Interdepartmental and interagency co-ordination is another must.
- Encroachments have to be firmly removed and such land restored to State or community owned forests.
- Forest > Strategy & Policy
RECENT POLICY AND OTHER INITIATIVES
Uttar Pradesh has enacted various Act and Laws (as different from Central Laws) to conserve the forest and biodiversity resources and to regulate their use. The important among them being UP Tendu Patta Niyamawali 1972; UP Wildlife (Protection) Act 1974; The Panchayat Forest Act 1976; The UP Resin and other Forest Producs (Regulation of Trade Rule) 1976; and UP Tree Protection Act 1976. It is significant to note that the control of reserve forest land, civil land and Van Panchayat land is vested with the UP Forest Department, Revenue Department and Van Panchayats respectively. There is a need to streamline different regulations and approaches to forest management under various categories of land vested with different authorities.
Social forestry, farm forestry and agro forestry
The most viable options of increasing the green cover in the state are social forestry in degraded areas, farm forestry, and agro-forestry. As a part of its afforestation program, the Department of Forests has focused on agro forestry and social forestry as a means of enhancing the green cover in the state.
Operation green
Operation Green, a major programme of UP, involves stakeholder participation at various levels in an effort in increase the green over. The active involvement of different government departments is mandatory. The concerns concerned departments have been requested to earmark part of their departmental budget for increasing the green cover. The state government has increase the allocation of resources for this program in the last two years. However, no evaluation studies have been carried out for Operation Green.
Tree plantations in vacant lands and around buildings
A special Government Order has been released asking various departments to initiate tree plantation efforts in the available vacant lands in their possession and the free spaces around their buildings.
Joint forest management
Programs for joint forest management involving user communities have been evolved and forest laws in this regard have been framed in the form of the Uttar Pradesh Village Forests Joint Management Rules 1997. As on March 1, 2002, 50703 ha of land is under JFM controlled by 540 Forest Protection Committees (JFM Monitoring Cell, MoEF, Delhi).
The National Forest Policy envisages 33% forest cover for the country as a whole (66% in hills and 20% in Plains). It empahsises environmental stability, preservation and restoration of forests, increasing forest cover, social orestry, joint forest management (JFM) and people's participation UP' forest poicy of 1998 has similar objectives, stresses increasing forest density and productivity, retrieving of degraded lands for tree cover, farm-forestry, making fuelwood available to weaker sections in rural areas, protecting floral and faunal biodiversity, looking for alternatives to uses of wood, promoting small wood based crafts and industries within available resource limits. JFM and the taking up of forestry as mass movement. Ecological balance is its essential objective