MIT Reviews
87% would recommend to a friend
(3621 total reviews)
L. Rafael Reif
93% approve of CEO
MIT has an employee rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars, based on 3,621 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The MIT employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).
What people are saying about MIT
Got a burning question about MIT? Just ask!
On Glassdoor, you can share insights and advice anonymously with MIT employees and get real answers from people on the inside.
Ratings by Demographics
This rating reflects the overall rating of MIT and is not affected by filters.
Filter Reviews by Topic
Found 3,621 of over 4K reviews
Updated Apr 16, 2024
-
5.0Current EmployeeCambridge, MA
Pros
good on- campus daycare provider
Cons
the salary is a bit low, hard to rent a studio in the kendall square
-
5.0Current Employee, more than 5 yearsCambridge, MA
Pros
Open academic environment, great opportunities to learn.
Cons
Tight reseach schedule, average compensation.
-
5.0Current Employee, more than 5 yearsCambridge, MA
Pros
Good health care coverage, support for children/aging parents situations, pension, generous vacation.
Cons
Not much turnover so career advancement can be limited in some cases.
-
4.0Former EmployeeCambridge, MA
Pros
You learn a great deal.
Cons
Can be overwhelming at times.
-
5.0Former EmployeeCambridge, MA
Pros
The most talented community in AI
Cons
Can move slowly compared to industry
-
1.0Former Employee, less than 1 yearBoston, MA
Pros
I had the privilege of collaborating with an outstanding group of colleagues during my time at the company. My co-workers were not only amazing but also incredibly supportive, creating a positive and inclusive work environment. Central HR proved to be a standout department, consistently providing exceptional support and professionalism. Their dedication to employee well-being significantly contributed to a positive workplace culture. Within my specific team, I had the pleasure of working under the leadership of Jackie and Jane, both of whom were exceptional managers and individuals. Their leadership style fostered a positive atmosphere that encouraged collaboration and productivity. While my experience with my co-workers, Central HR, Jackie, and Jane was exceptionally positive, I must note that my interactions with other aspects of management and HR were less than satisfactory. However, I am immensely grateful for the positive impact that my immediate team and these mentioned individuals had on my overall professional experience
Cons
In my experience at CSAIL, I observed challenges within the Management and HR departments. Specifically, individuals such as Gretchen Jones, who held a managerial position, and Stephan from internal HR, contributed to a less-than-ideal work environment. Gretchen Jones, in particular, exhibited a reluctance to engage in effective management practices. She demonstrated impatience when faced with inquiries, preferring to provide information once and then disengage from any ongoing support or guidance. Over the course of my seven months with the organization, I noted four instances of team members departing from her team, indicative of a management approach that prioritizes avoidance over active leadership. While maintaining a pleasant demeanor in personal interactions, Gretchen's conduct in meetings revealed a harsh and backstabbing disposition. Similarly, Stephan, the HR representative present in many of our meetings, appeared disengaged and unhelpful. His consistent refrain of not understanding the specifics of my role, coupled with a passive stance of mere observation, suggested a lack of substantive support. It became evident that Stephan functioned more as a conduit for Gretchen's perspectives, rather than an advocate for employee well-being. In my attempt to address these concerns, I found myself standing alone, as others remained silent, perhaps due to a culture of secrecy surrounding such matters. Even other managers appeared aware of Gretchen's management style but chose not to intervene. In conclusion, my experience with management and HR at CSAIL has been unsatisfactory, and I hope for a more proactive approach to addressing these issues to create a healthier work environment.
1 -
5.0Current Employee
Pros
There are amazing undergraduates at MIT.
Cons
MIT's challenges can feel quite contrived
-
5.0Current EmployeeCambridge, MA
Pros
Independence, students, resources, community, reputation
Cons
Salary, compute, students leave for industry
-
4.0Current Employee
Pros
Respectful work environment, flexible schedule, lots of networking opportunities, high quality resources, collaborative spirit
Cons
Lack of representation/voice at the institute level. Pay is a little low for housing options close to mbta, but there's not enough parking for most people to commute via car.
-
4.0Current Employee, more than 1 yearBoston, MA
Pros
Part time. Moderate workload (at least under my PI) and a good supplement to MIT expenses –especially good if you're not paying tuition.
Cons
Usually, there is little room to grow; challenges depend on the project and particular PI. Once the milestones of a project have been reached, the work can get boring, and low-level tasks start to come up.
MIT Reviews FAQs
-
MIT has an overall rating of 4.4 out of 5, based on over 4,076 reviews left anonymously by employees. 87% of employees would recommend working at MIT to a friend and 80% have a positive outlook for the business. This rating has improved by 1% over the last 12 months.
-
87% of MIT employees would recommend working there to a friend based on Glassdoor reviews. Employees also rated MIT 3.7 out of 5 for work life balance, 4.0 for culture and values and 4.2 for career opportunities.
-
According to reviews on Glassdoor, employees commonly mention the pros of working at MIT to be culture, career development, benefits and the cons to be compensation .