Skip to main content
Log in

Biocultural Diversity: Moving Beyond the Realm of ‘Indigenous’ and ‘Local’ People

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

During the past decade the relationship between biodiversity and human diversity has received increased attention, resulting in the identification of what the Declaration of Belém calls an ‘inextricable link’ between biological and cultural diversity. Although the term biocultural diversity, introduced to denote this link, is being used increasingly, there has been little critical reflection on what it precisely refers to. I argue that it is used with particular reference to ‘indigenous traditional’ people, but that there is scope for extending its application within biocultural discourse. I therefore review the concept of culture and discuss what constitutes cultural values of the natural environment. I conclude that the concept of culture must be understood as involving a dynamic process of transcultural exchange and constant re-articulations of tradition resulting in the persistence of certain cultural practices. This approach ultimately reveals that the concept of biocultural diversity is also applicable to non-indigenous traditional communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These values have been converted at exchange rate of $1=R6.07, January 2005.

  2. The term wild plants has been used to distinguish between wild and domesticated species and not to suggest that the landscapes where they occur are virgin land or unaffected by human influence or tenure (Cunningham, 2001, p. 9). The term wild resources includes NTFPs, animals, insects, and marine species as well as vegetation units such as sacred forests, etc.

REFERENCES

  • Bank, L. (2002). Beyond red and school: Gender, tradition and identity in the rural Eastern Cape. Journal of Southern African Studies 28(3): 631–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folk, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10(5): 1251–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2001). Religious traditions and biodiversity. Encyclopaedia of Biodiversity 5: 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. (1990).The Location of Culture, Routledge: London.

  • Campbell, B., Mandondo, A., Nermarundwe, N., Sithole, B., de Jong, W., Luckert, M., and Matose, F. (2001). Challenges to proponents of common property resource systems: despairing voices from social forests in Zimbabwe. World Development 29: 589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. M., and Luckert, M. K. (2002) (eds.). Uncovering the Hidden Harvest. Valuation Methods for Woodland and Forest Resources, Earthscan Publishing Ltd., London.

  • Canclini, G. (1995). Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity, University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis.

  • Cocks, M. L., and Møller, V. (2002). Use of indigenous and indigenised medicines to enhance personal well-being: a South African case study. Social Science and Medicine 54: 387–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cocks, M. L., and Wiersum, K. F. (2003). The significance of biodiversity to rural households in Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 13: 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocks, M. L., and Dold, A. P. (2004). A new broom sweeps clean. The economic and cultural value of grass brooms in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 14(1): 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocks, M. L., and Dold, A. P. (in press). Conservation of biocultural diversity: the role of medicinal plants in Xhosa culture. Journal of Ethnobiology.

  • Cocks, M. L., Dold, A. P., and Grundy, I. (2001). Challenges facing a community structure to implement CBNRM in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. African Studies Quarterly 5(3): http://web.africa.ufl.edu/asq/v5/v5i3a4.htm

  • Cocks, M. L., Dold, A. P., and Bangay, L. J. (in press). The wood for the trees—use of woody plant material in the maintenance of household cultural artefacts in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Environment, Development and Sustainability.

  • Cunningham, A. B. (1991). The herbal medicine trade: Resource depletion and environmental management for a hidden economy. In Preston-Whyte, E., and Rogerson, C. (eds.), South Africa's Informal Economy, Oxford University Press, Cape Town, pp. 196–206.

  • Cunningham, A. B. (2001). Applied Ethnobotany: People, Wild Plant Uses and Conservation, Earthscan, London, U.K.

  • Dold, A. P., and Cocks, M. L. (2002). The trade in medicinal plants in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa. South African Journal of Science 98: 589–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., and Isherwood, B. (1997). The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption, 2nd ed., Routledge, London and New York.

  • Ellen, R. F. (1986). What black elk left unsaid: On the illusory images of green primitivism. Anthropology Today 2(6): 8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F. (1998). Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. Journal of Development Studies 35(1): 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius, C., Koch, E., Turner, S., and Magome, H. (2004) (eds.). Rights, Resources and Rural Development: Community-based Natural Resource Management in Southern Africa, Earthscan, London, U.K.

  • Goebel, A., Campbell, B., Mukamuri, B., and Veeman, M. (2000). People, values, and woodlands: A field report of emergent themes in interdisciplinary research in Zimbabwe. Agriculture and Human Values 17: 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenfeldt, D. (2003). The future of indigenous values: cultural realism in the face of economic development. Futures 35: 917–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infield, M. (2001). Cultural values: a forgotten strategy for building community support for protected areas in Africa. Conservation Biology 15(3): 800–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2002). Introduction to culture. In Ingold, T. (ed.). Encyclopedia of anthropology, Routledge: London, pp. 327–350.

  • Kalland, A. (1999). A Japanese view on whales and whaling. In Posey, D. A. (ed.), Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity, UNEP and Intermediate Technology Publications, London, U.K., pp. 426–431.

  • Kuper, A. (1999). The Invention of Primitive Society: Transformations of an Illusion, Routledge, London, U.K.

  • Kusel, J. (2001). Assessing well-being in forest dependent communities. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 13(1/2): 359–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laird, S. A. (1999). Forests, culture and conservation. In Posey, D. A. (ed.), Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity, UNEP and Intermediate Technology Publications, London, U.K., pp. 345–396.

  • Machlis, G. E. (1992). The contribution of sociology to biodiversity research and management. Biological Conservation 62: 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maffi, L. (2001). Introduction: On the interdependence of biological and cultural diversity. In Maffi, L., and McNeely, J. A. (eds.), On Biocultural Diversity. Linking Language, Knowledge and the Environment, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London.

  • Mander, M. (1998). Marketing of indigenous medicinal plants in South Africa. A case study in KwaZulu-Natal, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, 151 pp.

  • McGregor, D. P. (1999). Hawaiian subsistence, culture and spirituality, and natural biodiversity. In Posey, D. A. (ed.), Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity, UNEP and Intermediate Technology Publications, London, U.K., pp. 114–116.

  • McNeely, J. A. (2000). Cultural factors in conserving biodiversity. In Wilkes, A., Tillman, H., Salas, M., Grinter, T., and Shaoting, Y. (eds.), Links between Cultures and Biodiversity. Proceedings of the Cultures and Biodiversity Congress, Yunnan Science and Technology Press, China, pp. 128–142.

  • Milton, K. (1996). Environmentalism and Cultural Theory. Exploring the Role of Anthropology in Environmental Discourse, Routledge, London and New York.

  • Motte-Florac, E., and Ramos-Elorduy, J. (2002). Is the traditional knowledge of insects important? In Stepp, J. R., Wyndham, F. S., and Zarger, R. K. (eds.), Ethnobiology and Biocultural Diversity. Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Ethnobiology, The International Society of Ethnobiology, Athens, GA, pp. 207–224.

  • Orlove, B. S., and Brush, S. B. (1996). Anthropology and the conservation of biodiversity. Annual Reviews Anthropology 25: 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posey, D. A. (1999). Cultural and spiritual values of biodiversity. A complementary contribution to the global biodiversity assessment. In Posey, D. A. (ed.), Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity, UNEP and Intermediate Technology Publications, London, U.K., pp. 1–19.

  • Prins, F. E. (1996). Prohibitions and pollution at a medicinal plant nursery: customary implications associated with ethnobotanical reserves in a conservative areas of KwaZulu-Natal. Natal Museum Journal of Humanities 8: 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport, N., and Overing, J. (2000). Social and Cultural Anthropology: The key concepts, Routledge, London, U.K.

  • Redford, K. H. (1990). The ecologically noble savage. Orion Nature Quarterly 9(3): 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Perez, M., and Arnold, J. E. M. (1996) (eds.). Current Issues in Non-timber Forest Products Research, Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, 264 pp.

  • Seeland, K. (1997). Indigenous knowledge of trees and forests in non-European societies. In Seeland, K. (ed.), Nature is Culture. Indigenous Knowledge and Sociocultural Aspects of Trees and Forests in Non-European Cultures, Intermediate Technology Publication, London, U.K., pp. 101–113.

  • Shackleton, C. M., Shackleton, S. E., and Cousins, B. (2001). The role of land-based strategies in rural livelihoods: the contribution of arable production, animal husbandry and natural resource harvesting. Development Southern Africa 18: 581–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton, C. M., and Shackleton, S. E. (2004). Use of woodland resources for direct household provisioning. In Lawes, M. J., Eeley, H. A. C., Shackleton, C. M., and Geach, B. S. G. (eds.), Indigenous Forests and Woodlands in South Africa: Policy, People and Practice, University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, Scottsville, South Africa, pp. 195–225.

  • Shengji, P. (1999). The holy hills of the Dai. In Posey, D. A. (ed.), Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity, UNEP and Intermediate Technology Publications, London, U.K., pp. 381–382.

  • Spiegel, A. (1997). Continuities, culture and the commonplace: searching for a new ethnographic approach in South Africa. In McAllister, P. (ed.), Culture and the Commonplace. Anthropological Essays in honour of David Hammond-Tooke, Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg, pp. 9–29.

  • Sunderland, T., and Ndoye, O. (2004) (eds.). Forest Products, Livelihoods and Conservation. Case Studies of Non-Timber Forest Systems. Volume 2—Africa. Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogar, Indonesia.

  • Wiersum, K. F. (2004). Use and conservation of biodiversity in East African forested landscapes. In Zuidema, P. A. (ed.), Tropical Forests in Multi-Functional Landscapes. Proceedings of Seminar Series Issues in International Nature Conservation, Utrecht University Prince Bernard Centre for International Nature Conservation, Utrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 33–39.

  • Wiersum, K. F., Dold, A. P., Husselman, M., and Cocks, M. L. (in press). Cultivation of medicinal plants as a tool for biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation in the Amatola region, South Africa. In Bogers, R. (ed.), Medicinal and aromatic plants, WUR Frontis Series Vol. 17. Springer: Dordrecht.

  • Wiersum, K. F., Singhal, R., and Benneker, C. (2004). Common property and collaborative forest management; rural dynamics and evolution in community forestry regimes. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 14: 281–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum, K. F., and Shackleton, C. (2005). Rural dynamics and biodiversity conservation in southern Africa. In Ros-Tonen, A. F., and Dietz, T. (eds.), Linking Global Conservation Objectives and Local Livelihood Needs: Lessons from Africa, Edwin Mellen Press, U.K., pp. 67–92.

  • Wollenberg, E., and Ingles, A. (1998) (eds.). Incomes from the Forest. Methods for the Development and Conservation of Forest Products for Local Communities, Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.

  • Wood, A., Stedman-Edwards, P., and Mang, J. (2000). The Root Causes of Biodiversity Loss, Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, U.K. and Sterling, U.S.A.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author wishes to acknowledge the invaluable assistance Dr K.F. Wiersum provided on the preparation of this manuscript. Dr G. Persoon, Prof. R.C.G. Palmer, Mr T. Dold, Prof. C. Shackleton, and Mr M. Greenland are also thanked for comments on earlier drafts. Thanks are also extended to three anonymous referees for their useful comments. Funding to carry out this review was provided by the IFS (International Foundation of Science).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Cocks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cocks, M. Biocultural Diversity: Moving Beyond the Realm of ‘Indigenous’ and ‘Local’ People. Hum Ecol 34, 185–200 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9013-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9013-5

Key Words

Navigation