Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0188

Despite its emancipatory ambitions and its rich portraits of agency, the institutional work literature has been criticized for its limited engagement with questions of normative social purpose. Synthesizing the literature on institutional work and on positive organizational scholarship, in this article I define positive institutional work as the creation or maintenance of institutional patterns that express mutually constitutive experiential and social goods. This synthesis expands existing theories of institutional work in three ways. It introduces the concept of experiential legitimacy and suggests that experiential surfacing may be a foundational aspect of positive institutional work. It offers collaborative inquiry as a largely overlooked solution to the paradox of embedded agency and explores such inquiry as a primary mode of positive agency. And it argues that positive institutional stability rests upon work aimed at making group boundaries and material practices more inclusive. Taken together, these three themes suggest new theoretical and practical directions for further inquiry into the relationship between institutional work and social purpose. They also contribute to the positive organizational scholarship literature’s implicit institutional ambitions by articulating a more socially embedded vision of positive organizational practices.

REFERENCES

  • Alderfer C. P., Smith K. K. 1982. Studying intergroup relations embedded in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 35–65. Google Scholar
  • Baker W., Cross R., Wooten M. 2003. Positive organizational network analysis and energizing relationships. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 328–342. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Barley S. R. 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 78–108. Google Scholar
  • Battilana J. 2006. Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13: 653–676. Google Scholar
  • Battilana J., D’Aunno T. 2009. Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations: 31–58. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Battilana J., Dorado S. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1419–1440.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Battilana J., Leca B., Boxenbaum E. 2009. How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3: 65–107.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beckert J. 1999. Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change: The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20: 777–799. Google Scholar
  • Benn S., Baker E. 2009. Advancing sustainability through change and innovation: A co-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Change Management, 9: 383–397. Google Scholar
  • Berger P. L., Luckmann T. 1967. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor. Google Scholar
  • Berlyne D. E. 1966. Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153: 25–33. Google Scholar
  • Bernstein S. D. 2003. Positive organizational scholarship: Meet the movement. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12: 266–271. Google Scholar
  • Bourdieu P. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  • Boxenbaum E., Pedersen J. S. 2009. Scandinavian institutionalism—A case of institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations: 178–204. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Branzei O. 2012. Social change agency under adversity: How relational processes (re)produce hope in hopeless settings. In K. Golden-Biddle & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Using a positive lens to explore social change and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation: 21–47. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Bright D. S., Cameron K. S., Caza A. 2006. The amplifying and buffering effects of virtuousness in downsized organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 64: 249–269. Google Scholar
  • Brockner J., James E. H. 2008. Toward an understanding of when executives see crisis as opportunity. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44: 94–115. Google Scholar
  • Brown A. D., Starkey K. 2000. Organizational identity and learning: A psychodynamic perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25: 102–120.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bushe G. R. 2012. Foundations of appreciative inquiry: History, criticism and potential. AI Practitioner, 14: 8–20. Google Scholar
  • Bushe G. R., Kassam A. F. 2005. When is appreciative inquiry transformational? A meta-case analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41: 161–181. Google Scholar
  • Calas M. B., Smircich L. 1996. From “the woman”s’ point of view: Feminist approaches to organization studies. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies: 218–257. London: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Callahan J. L. 2004. Reversing a conspicuous absence: Mindful inclusion of emotion in structuration theory. Human Relations, 57: 1427–1448. Google Scholar
  • Cameron K. S. 2003. Organizational virtuousness and performance. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 48–65. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Cameron K. S., Bright D., Caza A. 2004. Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance.American Behavioral Scientist, 47: 766–790. Google Scholar
  • Cameron K. S., Caza A. 2002. Organizational and leadership virtues and the role of forgiveness. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9: 33–48. Google Scholar
  • Cameron K. S., Dutton J. E., Quinn R. E., Wrzesniewski A. 2003. Developing a discipline of positive organizational scholarship. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 361–370. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Cameron K. S., Winn B. 2012. Virtuousness in organizations. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 231–243. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Carlsen A. 2008. Positive dramas: Enacting self-adventures in organizations. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3: 55–75. Google Scholar
  • Carlsen A., Hagen A. L., Mortensen T. F. 2012. Imagining hope in organizations: From individual goal-attainment to horizons of relational possibility. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 288–303. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Chafetz J. S. 1997. Feminist theory and sociology: Underutilized contributions for mainstream theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 97–120. Google Scholar
  • Christensen L. J. 2012. Navigating change in the company of (dissimilar) others: Co-developing relational capabilities with microcredit clients. In K. Golden-Biddle & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Using a positive lens to explore social change and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation: 401–429. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Clemens E. S., Cook J. M. 1999. Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 441–466. Google Scholar
  • Cloutier C., Langley A. 2013. The logic of institutional logics: Insights from French pragmatist sociology. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22: 360–380. Google Scholar
  • Colomy P. 1998. Neofunctionalism and neoinstitutionalism: Human agency and interest in institutional change. Sociological Forum, 13: 265–300. Google Scholar
  • Cooperrider D. L., Godwin L. N. 2012. Innovation-inspired change in an economy and ecology of strengths. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 737–750. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Cooperrider D. L., Sekerka L. E. 2003. Toward a theory of positive organizational change. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 225–240. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Creed W. E. D., DeJordy R., Lok J. 2010. Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1336–1364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Currie G., Lockett A., Finn R., Martin G., Waring J. 2012. Institutional work to maintain professional power: Recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organization Studies, 33: 937–962. Google Scholar
  • Davidson M. N., James E. H. 2007. The engines of positive relationships across difference: Conflict and learning. In J. E. Dutton & B. R. Ragins (Eds.), Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation: 137–158. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: 3–22. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. 1991. Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Dobbin F., Sutton J. R., Meyer J. W., Scott W. R. 1993. Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. American Journal of Sociology, 99: 396–427. Google Scholar
  • Dorado S. 2005. Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organization Studies, 26: 385–414. Google Scholar
  • Dover G., Lawrence T. B. 2010. A gap year for institutional theory: Integrating the study of institutional work and participatory action research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19: 305–316. Google Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Heaphy E. D. 2003. The power of high-quality connections. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 263–278. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Roberts L. M., Bednar J. 2010. Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35: 265–293.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Roberts L. M., Bednar J. 2011. Using a positive lens to complicate the positive in identity research: Response to Learmonth and Humphreys. Academy of Management Review, 36: 427–431.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Worline M. C., Frost P. J., Lilius J. 2006. Explaining compassion organizing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51: 59–96. Google Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D. 1994. Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 57–88. Google Scholar
  • Emirbayer M., Mische A. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103: 962–1023. Google Scholar
  • Feldman M., Khademian A. M. 2003. Empowerment and cascading vitality. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 343–358. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Fineman S. 2006a. Emotion and organizingClegg S. R.Hardy C.Lawrence T. B.Nord W. R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed.): 675–700. London: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Fineman S. 2006b. On being positive: Concerns and counterpoints. Academy of Management Review, 31: 270–291.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fligstein N. 1997. Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40: 397–405. Google Scholar
  • Foucault M. 1999. Space, power, and knowledge. In S. During (Ed.) & C. Hubert (Trans.), The cultural studies reader: 134–141. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Frederickson B. L. 2003. Positive emotions and upward spirals in organizations. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 163–175. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Freeman R. E., Harrison J. S., Wicks A. C., Parmar B. L., de Colle S. 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Garud R., Hardy C., Maguire S. 2007. Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28: 957–969. Google Scholar
  • Garud R., Karnøe P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32: 277–300. Google Scholar
  • George J. M. 2004. Book review of “Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 325–330. Google Scholar
  • Gherardi S., Perrotta M. 2011. Egg dates sperm: A tale of a practice change and its stabilization. Organization, 18: 595–614. Google Scholar
  • Ghoshal S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4: 75–91.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A. 1984. The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
  • Gittell J. H. 2003. A theory of relational coordination. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 279–295. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Golden-Biddle K., Dutton J. E. (Eds.) 2012. Using a positive lens to explore social change and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Golden-Biddle K., GermAnn K. 2007. Creating and sustaining positive organizational relationships: A cultural perspective. In J. E. Dutton & B. R. Ragins (Eds.), Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation: 289–305. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
  • Green S. E. J., Li Y., Nohria N. 2009. Suspended in self-spun webs of significance: A rhetorical model of institutionalization and institutionally embedded agency. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 11–36.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Hinings C. R. 1996. Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21: 1022–1054.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Suddaby R. 2006. Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The Big Five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 27–48.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gutierrez B., Howard-Grenville J., Scully M. A. 2010. The faithful rise up: Split identification and an unlikely change effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 673–699.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman J. R. 2009. The perils of positivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30: 309–319. Google Scholar
  • Hargrave T. J., Van de Ven A. H. 2006. A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31: 864–888.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hargrave T. J., Van de Ven A. H. 2009. Institutional work as the creative embrace of contradiction. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations: 120–140. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Harrison S. 2012. Organizing the cat? Generative aspects of curiosity in organizational life. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 110–124. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Heaphy E. D. 2013. Repairing breaches with rules: Maintaining institutions in the face of everyday disruptions. Organization Science, 24: 1291–1315. Google Scholar
  • Heclo H. 2002. The statesman: Revisiting leadership in administration. In R. A. Kagan, M. Krygier, & K. Winston (Eds.), Legality and community: On the intellectual legacy of Philip Selznick: 295–310. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar
  • Helfen M., Sydow J. 2013. Negotiating as institutional work: The case of labour standards and international framework agreements. Organization Studies, 34: 1073–1098. Google Scholar
  • Hensmans M. 2003. Social movement organizations: A metaphor for strategic actors in institutional fields. Organization Studies, 24: 355–381. Google Scholar
  • Hochschild A. R. 1983. The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
  • Hogg M. A., Terry D. J. 2000. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25: 121–140.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg M. A., Terry D. J., White K. M. 1995. A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58: 255–269. Google Scholar
  • Hwang H., Colyvas J. A. 2010. Problematizing actors and institutions in institutional work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20: 62–66. Google Scholar
  • Isaacs W. 1999. Dialogue: The art of thinking together. New York: Doubleday. Google Scholar
  • Jarzabkowski P., Matthiesen J., Van de Ven A. H. 2009. Doing which work: A practice approach to institutional pluralism. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations: 284–316. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Jost J. T., Burgess D., Mosso C. O. 2001. Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of systems justification theory. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations: 363–388. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Jost J. T., Major B. 2001. Emerging perspectives on the psychology of legitimacy. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations: 3–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Kaghan W., Lounsbury M. 2010. Institutions and work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20: 73–81. Google Scholar
  • Kanov J. M., Maitlis S., Worline M. C., Dutton J. E. 2004. Compassion in organizational life. American Behavioral Scientist, 47: 808–827. Google Scholar
  • Kark R. 2012. Workplace intimacy in leader-follower relationships. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 423–438. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Khan F. R., Munir K. A., Willmott H. 2007. A dark side of institutional entrepreneurship: Soccer balls, child labour and postcolonial impoverishment. Organization Studies, 28: 1055–1077. Google Scholar
  • Kraatz M. S. 2009. Leadership as institutional work: A bridge to the other side. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations: 59–91. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Kraatz M. S. 2011. Two cheers for institutional work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20: 59–61. Google Scholar
  • Krygier M. 2002. Selznick’s subjects. In R. A. Kagan, M. Krygier, & K. Winston (Eds.), Legality and community: On the intellectual legacy of Philip Selznick: 3–16. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar
  • Lamont M., Molnar V. 2002. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 167–195. Google Scholar
  • Lawrence T. B. 1999. Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25: 161–187. Google Scholar
  • Lawrence T. B. 2008. Power, institutions, and organizations. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 170–197. London: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Lawrence T. B., Hardy C., Phillips N. 2002. Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 281–290.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence T. B., Suddaby R. 2006. Institutions and institutional work. In Clegg S. R.Hardy C.Lawrence T. B.Nord W. R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed.): 215–254. London: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Lawrence T. B., Suddaby R., Leca B. 2009. Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organization: 1–28. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Lawrence T. B., Suddaby R., Leca B. 2011. Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20: 52–58. Google Scholar
  • Learmonth M., Humphreys M. 2011. Blind spots in Dutton, Roberts, and Bednar’s “Pathways for positive identity construction at work”: “You’ve got to accentuate the positive, eliminate the negative.” Academy of Management Review, 36: 424–427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee F., Caza A., Edmondson A., Thomke S. 2003. New knowledge creation in organizations. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 194–206. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Lilius J. M., Kanov J., Dutton J. E., Worline M. C., Maitlis S. 2012. Compassion revealed: What we know about compassion at work (and where we need to know more). In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 273–287. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Losada M., Heaphy E. D. 2004. The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams: A nonlinear dynamics model. American Behavioral Scientist, 47: 740–765. Google Scholar
  • Luthans F., Avolio B. 2003. Authentic leadership development. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 241–258. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Maguire S., Hardy C. 2006. The emergence of new global institutions: A discursive perspective. Organization Studies, 27: 7–29. Google Scholar
  • Maguire S., Hardy C. 2009. Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 148–178.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maguire S., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B. 2004. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 657–679.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mair J., Marti I., Ventresca M. J. 2012. Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 819–850.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Malsch B., Gendron Y. 2013. Re-theorizing change: Institutional experimentation and the struggle for domination in the field of public accounting. Journal of Management Studies, 50: 870–899. Google Scholar
  • Marti I., Fernandez P. 2013. The institutional work of oppression and resistance: Learning from the holocaust. Organization Studies, 34: 1195–1223. Google Scholar
  • Marti I., Mair J. 2009. Bringing change into the lives of the poor: Entrepreneurship outside traditional boundaries. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organization: 92–119. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Martin P. Y. 1990. Rethinking feminist organizations. Gender & Society, 4: 182–206. Google Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–363. Google Scholar
  • Micelotta E. R., Washington M. 2013. Institutions and maintenance: The repair work of Italian professions. Organization Studies, 34: 1137–1170. Google Scholar
  • Moore G., Beadle R. 2006. In search of organizational virtue in business: Agents, goods, practices, institutions and environments. Organization Studies, 27: 369–389. Google Scholar
  • Owens B. P., Hekman D. R. 2012. Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 787–818.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Owens B. P., Rowatt W. C., Wilkins A. L. 2012. Exploring the relevance and implications of humility in organizations. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 260–272. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Pacheco D. F., York J. G., Dean T. J., Sarasvathy S. D. 2010. The coevolution of institutional entrepreneurship: A tale of two theories. Journal of Management, 36: 974–1010. Google Scholar
  • Park N., Peterson C. 2003. Virtues and organizations. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 33–47. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Perkmann M., Spicer A. 2007. “Healing the scars of history”: Projects, skills and field strategies in institutional entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28: 1101–1122. Google Scholar
  • Perkmann M., Spicer A. 2008. How are management fashions institutionalized? The role of institutional work. Human Relations, 61: 811–844. Google Scholar
  • Polletta F. 2002. Freedom is an endless meeting: Democracy in American social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Powley E. H., Piderit S. K. 2008. Tending wounds: Elements of the organizational healing process. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44: 134–149. Google Scholar
  • Pratt M. G., Ashforth B. E. 2003. Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 309–327. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Pratt M. G., Pradies C. 2012. Just a good place to visit? Exploring positive responses to psychological ambivalence. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 924–937. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Quinn R. E., Wellman N. 2012. Seeing and acting differently: Positive change in organizations. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 751–762. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Quinn R. W. 2002. Flow in organizations and flow as organizing: The optimal experience of energy and tension at work. Working paper, University of Michigan School of Business, Ann Arbor. Google Scholar
  • Rathunde K. 2001. Toward a psychology of optimal human functioning: What positive psychology can learn from the “experiential turns” of James, Dewey, and Maslow. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41: 135–153. Google Scholar
  • Reason P. 2006. Choice and quality in action research practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15: 187–203. Google Scholar
  • Rhee S.-Y., Yoon H. J. 2012. Shared positive affect in workgroups. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 215–227. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Roberts L. M., Creary S. J. 2012. Positive identity construction: Insights from classical and contemporary theoretical perspectives. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 70–83. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Roberts L. M., Creary S. J., Hoffman A. J., Haigh N. 2012. Positive deviance for a sustainable world: Linking sustainability and positive organizational scholarship. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 953–964. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Rojas F. 2010. Power through institutional work: Acquiring academic authority in the 1968 Third World strike. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1263–1280.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rorty R. 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Rothbard N. P., Patil S. V. 2012. Being there: Work engagement and positive organizational scholarship. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 56–69. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Schildt H. A., Mantere S., Vaara E. 2010. Reasonability and the linguistic division of labor in institutional work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20: 82–86. Google Scholar
  • Schutz A. 1967. The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Google Scholar
  • Scott W. R. 2001. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
  • Selznick P. 1984a. TVA and the grass roots: A study of politics and organization. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
  • Selznick P. 1984b. Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
  • Selznick P. 1992. The moral commonwealth: Social theory and the promise of community. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
  • Selznick P. 1996. Institutionalism “old” and “new.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 270–277. Google Scholar
  • Seo M. G., Creed W. E. D. 2002. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27: 222–247.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seo M. G., Putnam L., Bartunek J. M. 2004. Dualities and tensions of planned organizational change. In S. M. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation: 73–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Sherer P. D., Lee K. 2002. Institutional change in large law firms: A resource dependency and institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 102–119.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J., Jayanti R. K. 2013. When institutional work backfires: Organizational control of professional work in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Management Studies, 50: 900–929. Google Scholar
  • Smets M., Jarzabkowski P. 2013. Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations, 66: 1279–1309. Google Scholar
  • Smets M., Morris T., Greenwood R. 2012. From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 877–904.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith W. K., Lewis M. W., Tushman M. L. 2012. Organizational sustainability: Organization design and senior leadership to enable strategic paradox. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 798–810. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Sonenshein S. 2012. Being a positive social change agent through issue selling. In K. Golden-Biddle & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Using a positive lens to explore social change and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation: 49–69. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Spreitzer G. M., Cameron K. S. 2012. A path forward: Assessing progress and exploring core questions for the future of positive organizational scholarship. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 1034–1048. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Spreitzer G. M., Lam C. F., Quinn R. W. 2012. Human energy in organizations: Implications for POS from six interdisciplinary streams. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 155–167. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Spreitzer G. M., Sonenshein S. 2003. Positive deviance and extraordinary organizing. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 207–224. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Spreitzer G. M., Sutcliffe K. M., Dutton J. E., Sonenshein S., Grant A. M. 2005. A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16: 537–549. Google Scholar
  • Stephens J. P., Heaphy E. D., Dutton J. E. 2012. High-quality connections. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 385–399. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Stets J. E., Burke P. 2000. Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63: 224–237. Google Scholar
  • Suchman M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571–610.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Suddaby R., Viale T. 2011. Professionals and field-level change: Institutional work and the professional project. Current Sociology, 59: 423–442. Google Scholar
  • Taylor C. 1989. Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  • Thornton P. H., Ocasio W., Lounsbury M. 2012. The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Tost L. P. 2011. An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36: 686–710.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Townley B. 2002. The role of competing rationalities in institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 163–179.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tracey P., Phillips N., Jarvis O. 2011. Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22: 60–80. Google Scholar
  • Trank C. Q., Washington M. 2009. Maintaining an institution in a contested organizational field: The work of the AACSB and its constituents. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations: 236–261. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Turner J. C. 1999. Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content: 6–34. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  • van Dijk S., Berends H., Jelinek M., Romme A. G. L., Weggeman M. 2011. Micro-institutional affordances and strategies of radical innovation. Organization Studies, 32: 1485–1513. Google Scholar
  • Verbos A. K., Gerard J. A., Forshey P. R., Harding C. S., Miller J. S. 2007. The positive ethical organization: Enacting a living code of ethics and ethical organizational identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 76: 17–33. Google Scholar
  • Voronov M., Vince R. 2012. Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, 37: 58–81.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walter F., Bruch H. 2008. The positive group affect spiral: A dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in workgroups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29: 239–261. Google Scholar
  • Weber K., Heniz K. L., DeSoucey M. 2008. Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 529–567. Google Scholar
  • Westley F., Antadze N. 2010. Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. Innovation Journal, 15(2): http://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/westley2antadze2make_difference_final.pdf. Google Scholar
  • Wijen F., Ansari S. 2007. Overcoming inaction through collective institutional entrepreneurship: Insights from regime theory. Organization Studies, 28: 1079–1100. Google Scholar
  • Williams M. 2012. Perspective taking: Building positive interpersonal connections and trustworthiness one interaction at a time. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 462–473. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Willmott H. 2010. “Institutional work” for what? Problems and prospects of institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20: 67–72. Google Scholar
  • Wooten L. P., Crane P. 2004. Generating dynamic capabilities through a humanistic work ideology. American Behavioral Scientist, 47: 848–866. Google Scholar
  • Worline M. C., Quinn R. W. 2003. Courageous principled action. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 138–158. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Wrzesniewski A. 2003. Finding positive meaning in work. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 296–308. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
  • Zietsma C., Lawrence T. B. 2010. Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 189–221. Google Scholar
  • Zietsma C., McKnight B. 2009. Building the iron cage: Institutional creation work in the context of competing proto-institutions. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organization: 143–177. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Zilber T. B. 2002. Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 234–254.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zilber T. B. 2006. The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: Translation of rational myths in Israeli hi-tech. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 281–303.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Zilber T. B. 2007. Stories and the discursive dynamics of institutional entrepreneurship: The case of Israeli high-tech after the bubble. Organization Studies, 28: 1035–1054. Google Scholar
  • Zilber T. B. 2009. Institutional maintenance as narrative acts. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organization: 205–235. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
  Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900