ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Noncovalent Functionalization of Graphene and Graphene Oxide for Energy Materials, Biosensing, Catalytic, and Biomedical Applications

View Author Information
Material Science Department, University of Patras, 26504 Rio Patras, Greece
Center for Superfunctional Materials, Department of Chemistry, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 689-798, Korea
§ Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Palacky University in Olomouc, 17 Listopadu 1192/12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic
*Tel.: +82-52-217-5410. Fax: +82-52-217-5419. E-mail: [email protected]
*Tel.: +420-58-563-4337. Fax: +420-58-563-4761. E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9, 5464–5519
Publication Date (Web):March 30, 2016
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00620

Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

83616

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (47 MB)

Abstract

This Review focuses on noncovalent functionalization of graphene and graphene oxide with various species involving biomolecules, polymers, drugs, metals and metal oxide-based nanoparticles, quantum dots, magnetic nanostructures, other carbon allotropes (fullerenes, nanodiamonds, and carbon nanotubes), and graphene analogues (MoS2, WS2). A brief description of π–π interactions, van der Waals forces, ionic interactions, and hydrogen bonding allowing noncovalent modification of graphene and graphene oxide is first given. The main part of this Review is devoted to tailored functionalization for applications in drug delivery, energy materials, solar cells, water splitting, biosensing, bioimaging, environmental, catalytic, photocatalytic, and biomedical technologies. A significant part of this Review explores the possibilities of graphene/graphene oxide-based 3D superstructures and their use in lithium-ion batteries. This Review ends with a look at challenges and future prospects of noncovalently modified graphene and graphene oxide.

SPECIAL ISSUE

This article is part of the Noncovalent Interactions special issue.

1 Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Graphene, a recent addition to carbon allotropes, is set to surpass all other allotropes in utility for life and material sciences due to its many intrinsic properties. (1-3) Its abundance in the multilayered form known as graphite can be traced back to antiquity. However, graphite in the form of individual sheets was not technically considered until more recently. It was known in metal workings as Kish and later identified as graphite with impurities existing between the layers. (4) The structure of graphite was deciphered with the advent of single-crystal X-ray crystallography, which revealed the honeycomb nature of individual layers as shown in Figure 1. The single layer called “graphene” is considered as the first two-dimensional (2D) crystal. (5)

Figure 1

Figure 1. A layer of graphene peeled away from the graphite found in a common pencil.

With an early elucidation by Wallace, (6) who took to assuming conduction in the layer and not between van der Waals spaced interlayers, it was then envisioned as a 2D material. Later, individual layers were experimentally observed by Boehm et al. from the reduction of graphite oxide, and they showed that the as-formed porous materials have applications such as in the sorption of gases and small organic molecules. (7, 8) Interestingly, Hoffman and Frenzel (9) described the reduction of graphite oxide using hydrogen sulfide before the demonstration by Boehm et al. (7, 8) that graphite oxide can be exfoliated. These methods of production for single or few layer graphene materials, albeit defective, are still applicable for large-scale production. The ability to make high-quality single layer graphene is credited to Novoselov and Geim who used Scotch tape to pull apart individual layers. (1) This breakthrough made it possible to observe properties that previously were known only in theory. Prior to this mechanical exfoliation, Van Bommel et al. (10) came to the conclusion that a monocrystalline graphite layer is formed over the Si surface, by studying the transformation on the faces of SiC after heating. A model depicting their observations is shown in Figure 2. Upon heating, the silicon is evaporated, allowing the upper carbon atoms to reposition in the next lower layer, and upon longer thermal annealing these atomic carbon layers turn into graphite. (10) A similar phenomenon was noted earlier by Foster et al. (11) during the thermal treatment of Al4C3 to grow graphite crystals. (11) Scanning tunneling microscopy images of single layer graphene were presented in 1992 by Land et al. (12) who decomposed either ethylene or naphthalene on a Pt(111) surface. Forbeaux et al. (13) in their 1998 article also used the word graphene to describe the top layer of carbon formed during the growth of graphitic layers on SiC.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Model of the SiC structure in which three carbon layers of SiC are collapsed under evaporation of Si to form one graphite layer: (− – −) unit mesh of SiC (0001); (- - -) unit mesh of the graphite layer; (○) C atoms from the collapse of three carbon layers of SiC; and (●) C atoms of the monocrystalline graphite top layer. Reprinted with permission from ref 10. Copyright 1975 Elsevier B.V.

When the atoms of carbon participate in robust covalent bonds between sp2 hybridized states forming an extended honeycomb topology, it gives the structure formed a strength to weight ratio that remarkably outperforms metals and metal composites. (3) Even with such strength, it is relatively flexible and thus can form the different allotropes such as carbon nanotubes, nanohorns, and fullerenes. (14-19) Furthermore, the zero band gap of graphene gives it excellent electron mobility; the investigation and modification of this mobility is important as a means to replace current semiconductors in electronic devices. (20, 21) Such changes can come about by altering graphenes structural dimensions. (22-25) Ideally, a few C atoms thick electronic devices could make such devices nearly invisible, as a single sheet of graphene is ∼97.7% transparent to white light, and represents a new means of delivering information. (26)
Prior to the focus on graphene (G), there was extensive research on the preparations and properties of graphite oxide and later graphene oxide (GO). (27-31) The obvious difference between G and GO is the addition of oxygen atoms bound with the carbon scaffold as shown in Figure 3. As a result, G is hydrophobic in nature whereas GO is hydrophilic, that is, easily dispersible in water. In addition, GO contains both aromatic (sp2) and aliphatic (sp3) domains, which further expands the types of interactions that can occur with the surface. GO is easily reduced to reduced GO at high yields; however, the quality of the produced graphenes is not suitable for electronic applications or mechanical reinforcement of polymers due to structural defects created during the synthesis of GO. Still this is a preferable route for large-scale handling of graphenic materials with tailored surface properties by functionalization.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Oxidation of graphene sheet to form graphene oxide.

Both G and GO described above play a central role in materials science thanks to their unique structural and morphological features, relatively easy chemical modification toward task-specific materials, as well as excellent electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties. Some niche applications include low-cost, large-area, flexible and/or lightweight electronics, displays or e-papers, polymer composites, catalysts, energy-related materials, sensors, and bioderivatives. Particularly the moderate reactivity of G at the interface provides a powerful tool in controlling its structure and properties to meet the applications listed above. Last, G/GO provides an excellent platform for the size-controlled deposition of highly dispersed nanoparticles with catalytic activity.
In most cases, functionalization is the best way to achieve the best performance out of G or GO. In this respect, the literature is massive for the growing applications of G and GO modified through both noncovalent interactions and covalent bonds. Generally, covalent functionalization compromises the sp2 structure of G lattices, thus resulting in defects and loss of the electronic properties. In contrast, noncovalent functionalization is largely preferred as it does not alter the structure and electronic properties of G while it simultaneously introduces new chemical groups on the surface. Common examples of noncovalent functionalization include polymer wrapping, π–π interactions, electron donor–acceptor complexes, hydrogen bonding, and van der Waals forces (see examples in Figure 4). In all instances, noncovalent functionalization leads to enhanced dispersibility, biocompatibility, reactivity, binding capacity, or sensing properties.
This Review focuses on noncovalent interactions of G and GO. First, a brief description regarding the nature of noncovalent interactions with G/GO is given in section 2. A detailed survey of various types of interactions and functionalization modes is provided in subsequent sections covering also the interactions of G/GO with polymers, aromatic molecules, biomolecules, drugs, and solvents (section 3). Later, the combination of G/GO with other carbon nanoallotropes and different 2D graphene analogues through noncovalent interactions and 3D superstructures follows (section 4). A significant part of this Review is devoted to the attachment of metal nanoparticles, metal oxide nanoparticles, and semiconducting nanoparticles (quantum dots) onto the surface of G/GO through simple, noninvasive deposition techniques with emphasis on applications in catalysis and lithium-ion batteries. Additionally, specific exploitations of various noncovalently modified G/GO in environmental, biomedical, sensoric, and catalytic applications, as well as in energy materials and nanodevices, are discussed (section 5). This Review ends with a look at current and future prospects of noncovalently modified G/GO (section 6).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Schematic representation of noncovalent interactions of G/GO with selected application-important species involving MoS2, aromatic polymers, proteins, core–shell nanoparticle, nanotube, quantum dot, ellipticine (drug/photoluminescence probe), DNA segment, and fullerenes (clockwise from top).

2 Noncovalent Interactions of Graphene and Graphene Oxide

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Noncovalent or supramolecular interactions are found in all types of materials that experience attractive and/or repulsive forces between them. These interactions are found in many natural and synthetic systems for recognition or detection. (32, 33) For the sake of simplicity, this Review will consider pristine G and avoid defects to the carbon honeycomb scaffold. The allowance of defects or distortions caused by the transformation of sp2 carbon to sp3 carbon, in the case of GO, for its involvement with noncovalent interactions is potentially beneficial for combining multiple interactions and will be discussed later.
To compare the relative strength of noncovalent interactions, we consider (i) the energy range of covalent bonds and (ii) the bond distances of single to multiple carbon bonds. The dissociation energies are ∼350 kJ mol–1 for single, ∼611 kJ mol–1 for double, and ∼835 kJ mol–1 for triple bonds, while the bonding distances range from 1.54, 1.34, and 1.20 Å for ethane, ethene, and ethyne, respectively. (34, 35) The energies of individual noncovalent/supramolecular interactions are normally lower than those mentioned for covalent bonds, but when combined over large surfaces they can rival some covalent bonds. The energy ranges for different interactions have been summarized by Atkins and de Pula, (36) Steed and Atwood, (37) and Skinner and Connor. (38) Dissociation energies for ionic bonds range from 100 to 350 kJ mol–1 and are similar to those of organometallic metal–carbon bonds, which range from 150 to 400 kJ mol–1. The dissociation energy begins to decrease for noncovalent interactions; that is, ion-dipole or coordinate covalent bonds range from 50 to 200 kJ mol–1 for coordination complexes or metals bound in crown ethers. These dissociation energies allow noncovalent/supramolecular systems to be reversible, or kinetically labile, and thus self-correcting. With graphenic materials, the π–π or CH−π interactions are prominent with dissociation energies less than 50 kJ mol–1. The weakest forces, that is, London-dispersion forces or van der Waals interactions, affect all atoms in close proximity. The solvation and hydrophobic effects (caused by different interactions types) are a large component to consider in G and GO systems as they influence not only its dispersibility but recognition interactions that can be used for sensing. (39, 40) The focus on π–π and hydrogen bonds is to target an accessible region at room-temperature conditions, thus making it easier to investigate without specialized laboratory equipment.
Interested readers can find additional detailed information about aromatic interactions in relation to the π–π interactions (i.e., π–π stacking interaction) from the review article by Hunters et al. (41) In G, two types of π–π interactions occur between the electron-rich and electron-poor regions, which influence its interaction with other molecules or nanomaterials. This is commonly seen in the face-to-face and edge-to-face arrangement as shown in Figure 5 for C6R6, where R is hydrogen for benzene and other substituents that alter the ring’s polarity. These interactions are not limited to benzene but are also observed in biologically relevant molecules such as DNA and porphyrins. Similarly, these interactions found in small molecules are carried over to GO and G systems where they can be employed to functionalize them for processing and property modification.

Figure 5

Figure 5. π–π stacking face-to-face (left), slipped (middle), and C–H···π (right) type from benzyl molecules where the gray atoms represent carbon and orange represents hydrogen for benzene or other atoms for different derivatives.

The general representation of π–π interaction types observed in G can be seen in Figure 6. Along with this, there is also a small possibility that CH···π-like interactions occur around the edge of G that may be terminated with a hydrogen atom or from phenyl rings oriented perpendicular to the surface of G. Because G is several magnitudes larger than the participating section of the modifying molecule or polymer, there should be multiple interactions on both sides of the G sheet.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Idealized π–π or C–H···π interactions from benzene, naphthalene, or pyrene molecules above and below the basal plane of graphene.

For GO, or more so for reduced graphene oxide (rGO), the basal plane is relatively similar to G except for defects by epoxides or hydroxides bound to the carbon atoms. For this reason, similar π-interactions will likely occur as shown with G, but there are additions of both hydrogen-bond donors and acceptor moieties from the epoxides, alcohols, ethers, carboxylic, and carboxylate oxygen bearing moieties that can contribute an additional mode for interactions. As shown in Figure 7, the oxygen moieties on GO may predominantly situate near or on the edges and aide in binding. Although it is still unclear the qualitative and quantitative distribution of various oxygen bearing functional groups within the basal plane, the reduction of GO can remove many of these groups, leaving an edge dominant oxygen moiety starting material.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Schematic representation of both hydrogen bonds and/or π–π stacking with GO.

Supramolecular interactions with G and the undisturbed regions of GO impart minimum structural impairment, and as such many of the original properties of the starting materials are retained.
The real time visualization of G, or graphite, with molecules adsorbed on the surface via noncovalent interactions, is evident from several scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) studies. Theoretical studies show that molecules on the G surface at either the solid–liquid, solid–atmosphere, or solid–vacuum interface are possible and can manifest as a property modifier for G. (42-44) Foster and Frommer’s first observation of single to several monolayers of 4-n-octyl-4′-cyanobiphenyl onto the surface of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) showed that the ordering lasted for several days during constant scanning (see Figure 8). (45)

Figure 8

Figure 8. Molecules of 4-n-octyl-4′-cyanobiphenyl aligned on the surface of HOPG. Reprinted with permission from ref 45. Copyright 1988 Nature Publishing Group.

Aromatic bodies with aliphatic chains are utilized well for designing 2D crystals on different flat surfaces including G. The favorable π–π interaction allows the molecules to lie flat on the surface while either hydrogen bonding or hydrophobic interaction guides the molecules to form the 2D supramolecular systems. The classic example of hydrogen bonding, leading to 2D supramolecular systems on graphite, is the organization of trimesic acid, which shows the different honeycomb (see Figure 9a) or flower (see Figure 9b) motifs. Griessel et al. (46) showed that the formation of these motifs is due to the formation of carboxylic acid dimer or trimer hydrogen bonds, respectively. This same group also demonstrated the adsorption of coronene, considered the smallest piece of G, on the cleaved surface of HOPG. (47) These two motifs, formed during trimesic acid organization, have been modeled on G and found to influence its electronic properties; this influence is based on the polymorphism. (48) The honeycomb motifs have also been observed in multilayer G by Zhou et al., (49) who also identified a close packing motif (see Figure 9c) on bilayer G supported on SiC. Shortly afterward, the honeycomb arrangement on single layer G was observed by MacLeod et al., (50) and they pointed out that the different supports under the G affect the 2D network. These authors also reported a lack of bandgap opening, using ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy, resulting from monolayer adsorption of a trimesic acid network, suggesting a lack of charge transfer. (50)

Figure 9

Figure 9. Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) images of trimesic acid on the surface of HOPG in (a) honeycomb, (b) flower, and (c) close packing motifs. Panels (a) and (b) reprinted with permission from ref 46. Copyright 2002 Wiley-VCH. Panel (c) reprinted with permission from ref 49. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Adding tetrafluoro-tetracyanoquinodimethane (F4-TCQN) to 1–3 layered epitaxial graphene (EG) grown on the 6H-SiC(0001) crystal face was observed using low energy electron diffraction (LEED) along with angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (PES). Chen and colleagues demonstrated a p-type doping effect due to electron transfer from EG to the F4-TCNQ adsorbed layer. (51) Interestingly, this layer was not observed on the EG/SiC substrate from STM, but from the STM height data it was considered to stand upright on the surface as shown in Figure 10a. (52) On the other hand, Stradi et al. (53) showed that monolayer coverage of F4-TCNQ or TCNQEG on a Ru(0001) face (see Figure 10b) tailored the magnetic ordering of EG.

Figure 10

Figure 10. (a) Upright arrangement of F4-TCNA on EG/SiC and (b) parallel with the EG/Ru surface. Panel (a) reprinted with permission from ref 52. Copyright 2010 American Physical Society. Panel (b) reprinted with permission from ref 53. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Monolayer adsorption of 3,4,9,10-perylene tetracarboxylicdianhydride (PTCDA) arranging in an herringbone motif on bilayer EG/SiC(0001) has been observed (see Figure 11). (54-57) With scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS), Lauffer et al. (55) observed n-type doping due to charge transfer from PTCDA to EG. In the same way, Huang et al. (54) observed a weak charge transfer from PTCDA to the EG layer using high-resolution PES.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Monolayer of PTCDA adsorbed on EG/SiC(0001). Reprinted with permission from ref 54. Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society.

Similar to PTCDA, perylenetetracarboxylicdiimide (PTCDI) forms monolayers on EG/Rh(111) and EG/SiC(0001). (58, 59) PTCDI monolayers, which adopt a herringbone arrangement, were thermally more stable by around 40 °C than PTCDA on the EG/SiC surface. (59) It was calculated by Kozlov et al. (60) that the bandgap will increase from the physisorption of PTCDI on G. Differences in the 2D arrangement of alkylated and nonalkylated PTCDI on EG/Rh(111) were observed by Pollard and coauthors. The hydrogen-bonding ability between the C═O and N–H in nonalkylated PTCDI allows for linear-like arrangement (see Figure 12a), while the alkylated PTCDI molecules were observed to form hexagonal motifs (see Figure 12b). (58) This type of hydrogen bonding is believed to be one of the reasons behind the stability of the adlayers on EG.

Figure 12

Figure 12. (a) Supramolecular chains of PTCDI and (b) an alkyl PTCDI derivative absorbed on EG/SiC. Reprinted with permission from ref 58. Copyright 2010 Wiley-VCH.

The issue of the interface layer having a profound influence on the G layer was not considered here, but is another challenge for future devices, which needs to be considered. We have briefly shown that many of the aromatic bodied molecules lie parallel with the G basal plane and that there are still challenges to explore in this research area. One of the challenges is to have free floating G, G bridge, or one or both surfaces covered with electron-donating or -withdrawing molecules. Also challenging will be to prepare Janus like G, (61) with two different π–π stacked molecules on either side of G for physical property tailoring. These small molecules that self-assemble onto G and other 2D materials are emerging tools for tailoring the band structure of G.
Before noncovalent interactions can be applied to G, the ability to prepare G dispersed in solution must be considered. A lot of work to make G a viable option for applications has been focused on improving its dispersibility in solvent without altering the honeycomb structure and leaving the material intact. It was revealed by Coleman and others that the surface tension of the solvent should be similar to the surface energy of the material to be exfoliated, that is, a crucial factor for preparing useable quantities of 2D materials. (30, 62-69) It has been found that the surface energy of G of approximately 68 mJ m–2 is similar to results from contact angle measurements by Wang et al. (70) who reported surface free energies of 54.8 and 46.7 mJ m–2 for graphite and G, respectively. This value is not necessarily best at explaining the exfoliation for G from graphite, but the Hansen and Hildebrand solubility parameters can shed insight for the dispersion of nanomaterials. (71-73) The Hansen parameters describe the solvent’s mixing ability of dispersive (δD), polar (δP), and hydrogen-bonding (δH) interactions. With G, it was approximated at δD,G ≈ 18 MPa1/2, δP,G ≈ 10 MPa1/2, and δH,G ≈ 7 MPa1/2. (67) These parameters are found for common organic solvents with a low vapor pressure such as NMP and DMF, and also for solvents like isopropanol. (66) This enhancement in our understanding to prepare good dispersions of G or other 2D nanomaterials has a small drawback with the commonly applied sonication procedure. That is, with longer times in the sonication bath, the size is generally reduced, but the quality remains intact.
Alternatively, π–π interactions can be experimentally studied by single molecule force spectroscopy (see Figure 13a). (74, 75) Single molecule force spectroscopy is considered as a poweful experimental tool providing a direct measurement of intermolecular force precisely at a single molecular level; it has been successfully employed to monitor many intramolecular and intermolecular interactions such as covalent bonding, ligand–receptor pairing, host–guest complexation, hydrogen bonding, coordination bonding, hydrophobic interactions, and charge-transfer interactions. For instance, the π–π interactions were directly observed between pyrene and graphite surface in aqueous solutions, manifested by single molecular ruptures (see Figure 13b). (74) The force curve fitting provided determination of the strength of the π–π interactions amounting to ∼55 pN. Another experimental example involves measurement of the force needed to peel the single-stranded DNA from the surface of single crystal graphite; with single molecule force microscopy, it was feasible to identify two types of force–displacement curves, that is, steady-state peeling or polymer chain stretching, depending on the type of the substrate. (75) Effective binding energy for interaction between polythymine and graphite was then estimated to be 11.5 kBT per nucleotide, in accordance with the theoretically predicted results.

Figure 13

Figure 13. (a) Schematic setup used for measuring the π–π interactions between pyrene and graphite in aqueous medium by single molecule force microscopy. (b) Force curves of pyrene-modified tips desorbed from graphite substrate in aqueous medium under a retraction velocity of 500 nm/s and at room temperature. Reprinted with permission from ref 74. Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society.

3 Driving Forces for Noncovalent Functionalization of Graphene and Graphene Oxide

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The noncovalent functionalization of G and GO is mostly based on van der Waals forces or π–π interactions with organic molecules or polymers that meet some basic criteria. Usually, van der Waals forces are developed between G or GO and organic molecules or polymers with high hydrophobic character, while π–π interactions are common between G or GO and molecules with short to highly extended π system. Because of the regular presence of oxygen groups on the surface and edges of GO, ionic interactions and hydrogen bonds are often involved. This is in contrast to pristine G, which has no oxygens that could contribute to these kinds of interactions.
The noncovalent interactions are very important for most applications because the extended π system of graphenic nanostructures is not interrupted, which means that important properties such as electric conductivity or mechanical strength are not affected. In addition, the mild and nonpermanent character of noncovalent interactions offers high flexibility with regards to the treatment of the afforded products. Taking into account that a comprehensive presentation of the noncovalent interactions of graphenic nanostructures has been presented in 2012, that is, our review on G functionalization, (76) this section is focused on the most recent representative research that deals with the noncovalent interactions of graphenic nanostructures with aromatic species, organic molecules, other carbon nanostructures, and inorganic species.

3.1 π–π Interactions

Depending on the basic properties of the aromatic molecules that are concerned, π–π interactions can be involved with the exfoliation of graphite and the stabilization of graphenic nanostructures in dispersion, the use of G as a platform for drug delivery, and the formation of a great variety of hybrids or composite functional materials with advanced properties. On the other hand, basic properties of the organic-aromatic components such as photoluminescence, light absorption, chemical stability, hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity, and morphological and structural characteristics are often influenced by their interactions with G/GO nanostructures.
The π–π interactions have two prevalent requirements. The first is the existence of π systems, and the second has to do with the geometry of the interacting species. It is necessary that an overlap exists between the two components to have a noticeable interaction, and usually this is strongly favored by the planarity of the two components. A pristine G monolayer has a rich extended aromatic system with almost planar geometry, which prefers to interact strongly with small aromatic molecules. On the other hand, rGO has decreased aromatic character, while GO can be described as a nonaromatic surface with sp3 carbon atoms with isolated small aromatic areas, sp2 domains. Furthermore, the existence of the sp3 carbon atoms (bonded with oxygen groups) introduces extended deviations from the planarity for GO. These two important factors are intended to differentiate the behavior of GO and rGO from that of G as regards the interaction with aromatic species. On the other hand, the behavior of a G nanostructure is not always similar to all aromatic molecules. The π–π interactions are influenced by several factors related to the aromatic molecules, among them the electron-donating or -withdrawing ability, (77, 78) their substituents, size, and planarity. (79)
Su et al. (78) used pyrene and perylenediimide derivatives to study the π–π interactions between electron donor and acceptor aromatic molecules with graphenic nanosheets. Both aromatic derivatives have been shown to interact strongly with rGO (symbolized as ReG in Figure 14), and the resulting hybrids were highly dispersible in water due to the sulfonic groups that, as part of the aromatic molecules, induce repulsive forces between the hybrid nanostructures. The π–π interactions of an electron donor such as pyrene-1-sulfonic acid (PyS) or an electron acceptor such as 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic diimidebisbenzenesulfonic acid (PDI) and rGO are characterized by a remarkable charge-transfer effect that is confirmed by the Raman spectra of the hybrids as a shift of the G-band to lower or to higher frequencies, respectively (see Figure 14).

Figure 14

Figure 14. Aqueous dispersion of (a) rGO, (b) rGO-PDI, and (c) rGO-PyS after centrifugation. (d) G-bands of the Raman spectra of the rGO, rGO-PDI, and rGO-PyS hybrids. Reprinted with permission from ref 78. Copyright 2009 Wiley VCH.

A similar change (upshift and downshift, respectively) was also observed for the C 1s XPS peaks of the hybrids that correspond to sp2 carbon in the basal plane of graphenic sheets. The characterization of the hybrids by atomic force microscopy (AFM) revealed planar nanostructures with 1.7 nm thickness that corresponds to a two-phase functionalized graphenic monolayer or 3.4 nm thickness that corresponds to a tandem sandwich structure (see Figure 15). (78)

Figure 15

Figure 15. AFM images and cross-section analysis of (a) rGO/PyS and (b) rGO/PDI on mica. Reprinted with permission from ref 78. Copyright 2009 Wiley VCH.

Using 1-naphthylamine, 1-naphthol, and naphthalene as model aromatic molecules with different polarity, Li et al. (80) showed that polarity is connected to the adsorption ability on a magnetically modified GO. Zhang et al. (81) have presented a detailed study on the ability of different carbon nanostructures to interact with π–π interactions (see Figure 16). They examined the binding ability of GO, rGO (it is characterized as chemically derived graphene, CDG), and single wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) using sulfonated aluminum phthalocyanine (AlPcS4) as the second aromatic planar component.

Figure 16

Figure 16. UV–vis absorption change of AlPcS4 (15 μm for rGO and 3 μm for GO) by the interaction with increased amount of (a) rGO and (b) GO. Reprinted with permission from ref 81. Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V.

The π–π interactions of rGO with AlPcS4 lead to the formation of a ground-state complex between the two components, which is characterized by a remarkable red shift and decrease of the Q absorption band of phthalocyanine as presented in Figure 16. It is also recorded that when the concentration of rGO reaches 12 mg mL–1, the free AlPcS4 almost disappears, while a similar concentration of GO (16.2 mg mL–1) decreased free AlPcS4 by only 30%. The analogous interaction with respect to SWNTs appeared far weaker. The binding capability as expressed by the formation constant Ks of the complex was estimated to be 21.6 for rGO, 0.31 for GO, and 0.012 g–1 L for SWNT. It was concluded that the binding ability of carbon nanostructures is analogous to the planarity of the structure, and to bind with the planar AlPcS4, rGO is by far more favored while the most curved SWNTs are not. The interaction of carbon nanostructures with the excited state was examined by the photoluminescence spectrum of AlPcS4, in the presence of carbon nanostructures. As presented in Figure 17, the characteristic emission band at 685 nm of AlPcS4 (15 μM) was decreased by the addition of rGO and totally disappeared when the concentration of rGO reached 12 mg L–1. The plot of intensity quenching as presented in Figure 17 showed that rGO (it is referred to as graphene in Figure 17) is much more efficient than GO, which means that rGO is also favored as regards the interaction of the excited state of AlPcS4, with carbon nanostructures, due to the enhanced electron-deficient character in comparison with SWNTs or GO.

Figure 17

Figure 17. (a) PL of AlPcS4 (15 μM) in the presence of rGO with excitation at 610 nm. (b) The plot of the intensity of quenching with the concentration of rGO, GO, and SWNTs. Reprinted with permission from ref 81. Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V.

The adsorption capability of GO and rGO has been also studied by Chen et al. (80) using three simple aromatic hydrocarbons, naphthalene, phenathrene, and pyrene, to compare their affinity to GO and rGO. The authors showed that hydrophobic character and the molecular size of the graphenic material affect the adsorption capability, as GO has far less adsorption capability than rGO.
Although pristine G was not a subject of the work by Zhang et al. (81) or Chen et al. (82) presented in the previous section, it can be easily concluded that G would be much more favored with π–π interactions than rGO or GO. G has a much more extended aromatic system and planarity, which means that the free surface that is offered to the aromatic molecules is much larger and so the interactions are stronger. Because of these advantages, π–π interactions of G with small aromatic molecules such as pyridine and fluorinated benzene derivatives, (83, 84) quinoline, (85) pyrene, (86-93) anthracene, (94, 95) triphenylene, (96) coronene, (97) ionic liquids, (98-102) and polymer ionic liquids (103) or porphyrin derivatives (104) can cause the exfoliation of graphite and/or stabilization of the afforded G nanosheets in organic solvents or water. In other words, π–π interactions can be the driving force for the exfoliation of graphite and stabilization of G derivatives in dispersion. The aromatic molecules act as wedges and penetrate slowly between the graphenic layers usually by the assistant of sonication. By this method, the graphenic layers are gradually dissociated from each other, leading finally to a complete separation. The aromatic core of these molecules is usually decorated by hydrophilic or lipophilic chains or groups providing, and through this the liberated graphenic layers are stabilized in water or organic solvents, respectively. Pynidinium tribromide is, among others, a characteristic aromatic molecule that exfoliates graphite and stabilizes graphenic monolayers or multilayers in water thanks to the electrostatic repulsions between the charged pyridinium species that are attached. (83) Lee et al. (86) used a tetrapyrene derivative (1 in Figure 18) decorated by a oligoetherdendron to exfoliate graphite and stabilize graphenic layers. The tetrapyrene aromatic skeleton interacted with G, while oligoether chains induce a high hydrophilic character to the hybrid. The authors showed also that the same tetrapyrene derivative is unable to disperse SWNTs, indicating that the planarity of the carbon nanostructure is a crucial factor for the formation of an effective π stacking. The π–π interactions are confirmed by the red-shifted absorption band and the quenching of the fluorescence band of pyrene when it interacts with G (product 1-G in Figure 18). (86)

Figure 18

Figure 18. (a) Structure of the tetrapyrene derivative. (b) The resulting hybrid is highly dispersible in water (1.5 mg mL–1). (c) Schematic representation of exfoliation process. (d) Absorption and (e) emission spectra of 1 and 1-G in 0.2 wt % (MeOH/H2O); λex = 340 nm. Reprinted with permission from ref 86. Copyright 2011 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Palermo et al. (92) used a series of sulfonated pyrene derivatives to study graphite exfoliation and G stabilization. The pyrene core is functionalized with one, two, three, or four sulfonic groups, which are electron acceptors, while two of them are also functionalized with two and one hydroxyl groups, which are electron donors as presented in Figure 19. The authors studied the procedure in two steps. The first step was the absorption of the pyrene molecules on graphite surfaces without sonication to avoid changes in the initial free surface. Calculating the amount of the unabsorbed pyrene derivative, it was estimated that their absorption on the graphite surface is inversely proportional to the number of the polar sulfonic groups. The second stage was the exfoliation and dispersion in water of the G/pyrene derivative hybrids. In this stage, the favorite molecule for exfoliation is that which has the highest dipole moment and the most asymmetric functionalization (PS2 in Figure 19). (92)

Figure 19

Figure 19. Four pyrene derivatives with increasing number of sulfonic groups used for the study of graphite exfoliation and G stabilization. Reprinted with permission from ref 92. Copyright 2013 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Imidazolium salts have also been used to interact with rGO monolayers. (98-102) These molecules interact with rGO monolayers by cation−π and π–π interactions, while electrostatic repulsions prevent aggregation between the rGO monolayers. In these studies, the role of these interactions is limited to the stabilization of G derivatives in polar solvents or water, because the oxygen groups of GO strongly favor exfoliation. By derivatization with phenyl vinyl groups, imidazolium ionic liquids that are π stacked on G are then copolymerized with vinyl monomers such as methyl methacrylate leading to a G-based polymer composite with homogeneous dispersion of G sheets and strong interaction between the components. (100)
Geng et al. (104) showed that a negatively charged porphyrin derivative (TPP-SO3Na in Figure 20) is a better dispersant than a positively charged one (TPP-ammonium in Figure 20). Although both derivatives strongly interacted with rGO, only the negatively charged porphyrin can keep the G sheets in dispersion due to the repulsive forces that developed between the negative charges after the noncovalent functionalization.

Figure 20

Figure 20. Porphyrin derivatives with sulfonate and ammonium groups. Reprinted with permission from ref 104. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.

The role of the interaction between the π systems of the G structure and aromatic molecules in the final hybrid is so descisive that in some cases it can induce important changes in the structure of the molecules. For example, the introduction of methylpyridinium groups as substituents to the planar porphyrin causes deviation from planarity because pyridinium groups are aligned almost perpendicular to the porphyrin plane due to steric hindrance (see Figure 21). Xu et al. (105) showed that electrostatic and mainly π–π interactions of this tetrapyridinium porphyrin derivative with G forced pyridinium groups to be aligned in the plane with the porphyrin, resulting in a further increase of the π–π interaction.

Figure 21

Figure 21. Schematic representation of pyridinium-functionalized porphyrin interacting with G by π stacking. Reprinted with permission from ref 105. Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society.

As regards the electronic properties of graphenic structures, Arramel et al. (106) showed that interaction with metallic porphyrins can causes a band gap opening in G, which could be further tuned depending on the metal cation of the porphyrin. For example, π stacking of iron protoporphyrin on G yields a band gap of 0.45 eV, while the zinc analogue gives a smaller band gap of about 0.23 eV.
The π system of organic molecules that interact with graphenic nanostructures is also responsible for the photophysical properties of these compounds, and usually the noncovalent interaction with G nanostructures causes important changes. (107, 108)
Phthalocyanine is a highly active chromophore, and its tetrasulfonated derivative (TSCuPc) is totally soluble in water. As a consequence of its aromaticity, it is easily attached onto G nanosheets by π stacking forming highly hydrophilic hybrids (see Figure 22). (108)

Figure 22

Figure 22. π–π interaction of phthalocyanine TSCuPc with G (GR in the image). Reprinted with permission from ref 108. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

The effective π–π interaction is revealed by the UV–vis spectrum of the hybrid where the characteristic band of the phthalocyanine dimer is not presented because interactions with G prevent the dimerization of phthalocyanine; additionally the Q-band of the monomer, which normally occurs at 663 nm, has been shifted to 705 nm (see Figure 23). (108)

Figure 23

Figure 23. UV–vis spectra of TSCuPc and the hybrid G/TSCuPc. Reprinted with permission from ref 108. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

The use of the G/TSCuPc hybrid as an agent for photothermal and photodynamic therapies has been further examined. As presented in Figure 24, the hybrid irradiated at 650 nm in a water solution can raise the temperature of the solution close to 55 °C after 10 min of irradiation. (108)

Figure 24

Figure 24. Time-dependent photothermal curves of G/TSCuPc and TSCuPc solutions. Reprinted with permission from ref 108. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

In comparison with G, the noncovalent interactions of aromatic chromophores with GO or rGO provide different results. G does not exhibit any photoluminescence activity, and π stacking of aromatic molecules results in the quenching of their fluorescence emission as described above. On the other hand, GO, due to its chemical structure, exhibits a broad fluorescence band with λmax around 600–700 nm (attributed to π–π* transition), and in some cases a second more intense band has been recorded near 450 nm (attributed to n−π* transition). The quantum yield of the photoluminescence of GO is generally small, and during reduction to rGO it is further lowered while the fluorescence bands are tuned to shorter wavelengths. (109-111)
The π–π interactions of rGO with chromophores seem to enhance the fluorescence emission of rGO, while, at the same time, quenching the fluorescence band of the chromophore. A characteristic example of this behavior is recorded by examining the interaction of riboflavin with rGO. Riboflavin (Rb) (vitamin B12) is an amphiphilic organic molecule that consists of a hydrophilic hydroxylated aliphatic chain and a hydrophobic aromatic isoalloxazine part that causes the effective π stacking of Rb on rGO. By excitation at 375 nm, the rGO/Rb hybrid showed a strong emission band at 430 nm remarkably more intense than that of rGO in the same region, while the fluorescence band of Rb, which normally appears near 530 nm, is almost quenched (see Figure 25). (112)

Figure 25

Figure 25. PL spectra of the rGO/Rb hybrid and rGO. Reprinted with permission from ref 112. Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V.

3.2 van der Waals, Ionic Interactions, and Hydrogen Bonding

Apart from the aromaticity that is involved in the π–π interactions, G is also characterized by its hydrophobic character, which promotes interactions of G with hydrophobic or partially hydrophobic organic molecules such as surfactants, ionic liquids, or macromolecules. These interactions are mostly used for the dispersion of G nanosheets in both aqueous and organic media or their incorporation in polymers. These hydrophobic interactions are also found in rGO, which is closer to G as regards aromatic character and hydrophobicity than GO, which has only a few aromatic regions on its surface and is hydrophilic. GO and, to a lesser degree, rGO also have a number of ionic groups, that is, mainly carboxylate and hydroxylate, which can take part in ionic interactions or hydrogen bonds with the analogous ionic parts of molecules or macromolecules.
The hydrophobic interaction of G or rGO with the aliphatic part of surfactants is often used to achieve an enhanced stability of G or rGO in water. The hydrophilic part of the surfactant responsible for this interaction could be an ionic, zwitterionic, or highly polar group. (113) Cellulose derivatives, (114-116) lignin, (114) albumin, (114) sodium cholate, (117) and sodium dodecyl benzenesulfonate (118) are just some of the amphiphilic organic molecules and macromolecules that have been used successfully as G dispersants and stabilizers. (119) Bourlinos et al. (114) have shown the stable dispersion of pristine G nanosheets with albumin or sodium carboxymethyl cellulose in water. Using liquid exfoliation technique, Lotya et al. (117) have achieved the stable dispersion of 0.3 mg mL–1 of pristine G nanosheets, with an average thickness of 4 layers, in water using sodium cholate as surfactant.
Stable aqueous suspensions of rGO have also been produced by the assistance of several lignin and cellulose derivatives. Sodium lignosulfonate (SLS) is an amphiphilic polymer, which is attached on rGO by both hydrophobic and π–π interactions due to the coexistence in the macromolecule of aromatic and aliphatic parts. The sulfonic groups of this polymer are responsible for the dispersion of the composite in water. Similarly, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, a natural polysaccharide, can be attached to G, and stable water dispersions are formed. It should be noted here that π–π stacking is not involved because cellulose is totally aliphatic. Finally, hydroxypropyl cellulose is able to disperse rGO, but the resulting composite is not stable in water unless the cellulose is primarily functionalized with pyrene groups. In this case, the polysaccharide is better attached onto the G surfaces thanks to enhanced π–π interactions, and the resulting composite is stable in water. (120)
On the other hand, when an amphiphilic molecule is attached to the graphenic surface by ionic interactions, the hydrophobic part enhances the stability of G in organic solvents. A representative example is the work of Liang et al. (115) who showed that GO and rGO can be functionalized with quaternary ammonium salts such as tetradecyl-trimethylammonium bromide. The positive “heads” of the surfactants interact with carboxylate and hydroxylate groups on GO or rGO through electrostatic interactions, while the aliphatic chains of the surfactants provide G with the necessary lipophilicity and stability in organic solvents. (115)
Ionic interactions also occur between end functionalized polymers, such as amine terminated polystyrene, and rGO, which lead to the transformation of the hydrophilic rGO into a lipophilic rGO/polymer composite dispersible in organic solvents (see Figure 26). (121)

Figure 26

Figure 26. Transformation of the hydrophilic rGO to an organophilic rGO/polymer composite using an amine terminated polystyrene. Reprinted with permission from ref 121. Copyright 2010 Royal Society of Chemistry.

4 Noncovalently Functionalizing Agents of Graphene and Graphene Oxide

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

4.1 Functionalization with Polymers

G derivatives usually have excellent mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties. A simple way to utilize these properties is their incorporation in polymer composites. A key factor for the ideal incorporation of graphenic nanostructures into polymer matrixes is the covalent or noncovalent interactions, which determine the homogeneity of the composite and the extent of the cooperation between the two components. The existence of π–π interactions between graphenic derivatives and polymers that contain aromatic rings is an excellent example in this case. A repeating aromatic polymer unit can strongly bind graphenic monolayers leading to highly homogeneous polymer composites with enhanced mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties. (122-125) Kevlar is a characteristic polymer with aromatic rings, which can interact strongly with G by π stacking as presented in Figure 27. Lian et al. (122) have used a Kevlar/graphene nanoribbon (GNR) composite to reinforce polyvynil chloride (PVC). The afforded Kevlar/GNR/PVC composite (containing 1 wt % GNR) demonstrated an increase of about 72.3% and 106% in Young’s modulus and yield strength, respectively.

Figure 27

Figure 27. Interaction of Kevlar with graphene nanoribbons. Reprinted with permission from ref 122. Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V.

The sulfonated derivative of polyaniline can also interact with G through π stacking providing a water dispersible composite. (126) Zhang et al. (123) used a series of phenyl or pyrene terminated functionalized polyethylene glycols (f-PEG) to interact with rGO via π stacking (see Figure 28). The pyrene groups were attached onto the G surface, while the flexible ethylene glycol chains allowed interconnection of the nanocomponents, thereby affording a stiff composite with enhanced mechanical properties. The electrical conductivity of these polymer composites is a result of the mixture of a nonconductive component such as the polymer and a conductive part such as G. The authors also studied the role of the aromatic end groups in the electrical conductivity of the final product. As shown in Figure 29, apart from the decrease of the conductivity as the amount of the polymer increased, the aromatic end groups influence the conductivity of the material with the terminal phenyl group giving the most favored conductivity. (123)

Figure 28

Figure 28. (a) Synthetic procedure of adding aromatic end groups to polyethylene glycol and (b) schematic presentation of the f-PEG/rGO composite formation. Reprinted with permission from ref 123. Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.

Figure 29

Figure 29. Electrical conductivity of the PEG/rGO composites with different polymer loadings. Reprinted with permission from ref 123. Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.

Polymers without an aromatic part have been also reinforced with G or rGO nanosheets. For example, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide surfactant (CTAB) has been used to disperse GO or rGO into natural rubber providing a polymer composite with improved electrical, chemical, and mechanical properties. (127) Surfactant-assisted mixing has been also used to disperse surfactant functionalized rGO into water-soluble polyurethane (WPU, polyurethane functionalized by sulfonate groups). The ionic interaction between the sulfonate group of WPU and the tertiary amine group of the surfactant is the driving force for the homogeneous dispersion (see Figure 30). (128)

Figure 30

Figure 30. Preparation of a composite material with waterborn polyurethane and surfactant covered rGO. Reprinted with permission from ref 128. Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V.

4.2 Functionalization with Biomolecules

In a manner similar to polymer composites, G and rGO have been combined successfully with biomolecules. For example, heparin is a biomolecule, which consists of a relatively hydrophobic cellulose backbone that is covered by a dense hydrophilic net of negatively charged carboxylates and sulfonate groups. The interaction of rGO and heparin is favored by the hydrophobic character of the heparin backbone and the rGO surface, while the repulsive forces between the charged surfaces of the composite keep it stable in aqueous biological media dispersion. (129) Hydrophobic interactions are also responsible for the immobilization of horseradish peroxidase on rGO. (130) When GO is used instead of rGO, the immobilization of enzymes such as horseradish peroxidase and lysozyme is dominated by strong electrostatic and hydrogen-bond interactions between oxygen groups of the GO and nitrogen groups of the enzymes (see Figure 31). (131)

Figure 31

Figure 31. Tapping mode AFM images of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) immobilized on GO at (a) small and (b) large enzyme loadings. (c) Schematic model of the GO-bound HRP. (d) Initial reaction rates of GO-bound HRP versus HRP concentration. Reprinted with permission from ref 131. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.

On the other hand, biomolecules with aromatic parts can interact with G through π–π interactions. A characteristic case is the immobilization of glucose oxidase on G. (132) Dopamine is a biological substance with remarkable contributions in the central nervous, renal, and hormonal systems, it acts as a neurotransmitter, and thus its detection and quantitative determination is very important for human health. (133) Usually, its presence is accompanied by the presence of ascorbic acid in much higher concentrations that cause interferences in the detection of dopamine. Electroanalysis has been used to establish effective methods for the determination of biological molecules with electrochemical activity, such as dopamine and ascorbic acid. The role of G here is very important because it has been shown that electrodes covered with G can discriminate between the presence of dopamine from that of ascorbic acid-based, due to the selective π–π interactions of dopamine with the graphenic surface. In this way, G modified electrodes can be used as selective sensors of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid that does not interact with the G surface. (134, 135) The linear range of these electrodes varies from 5–200 μm, (134, 135) and a detection limit of close to 2.64 μm has been reported. (134) G has been further modified to achieve better analytical results with regards to the determination of dopamine in the presence of other biological molecules. (136-140) The role of π–π interactions in these materials is also decisive. As shown in Figure 32, tryptophane can be attached by π stacking onto the G surface, and then this composite material is used to modify the electrode surface. (136) In this way, the linearity for the determination of dopamine ranges between 0.5 and 110 μm, and the detection limit is 0.29 μm. (136) Similar results have been achieved for an electrode coated with G modified with 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic acid (PTCA). (137)

Figure 32

Figure 32. Deposition of tryptophane/G on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) for the determination of dopamine. Reprinted with permission from ref 136. Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V.

In another approach, water-soluble porphyrin and rGO have been examined as an electrochemical detector for the determination of dopamine. The electrode formed in this study displays a detection limit of 9 × 10–9 M and a linear range between 10–6 and 7 × 10–5 M. Importantly, the detection of dopamine was not influenced by the presence of other interfering compounds such as uric and ascorbic acid. (138) Interesting results have also been reported for a hemin modified G electrode. Hemin is an iron-containing protoporphyrin known by its existence in the active site of heme protein. (139)
A great development has been recorded the last years in the area of hybrid nanomaterials based on the interactions of graphenic nanostructures with DNA probes. Single-stranded DNA (ss-DNA) macromolecules are easily immobilized on the surface of graphenic layers through π–π interactions between the hexagonal cells of G or GO and the aromatic bases. (141) Such G or GO/ss-DNA hybrids have been used as biosensors for the detection of DNA sequences that are linked to several diseases and genetic disorders based on the strong interactions that developed between the complementary DNA strands. G or GO/DNA hybrids as biosensors have been presented in detail in several significant review articles. (142-144)
In a characteristic example, Yang et al. showed that the fluorescence quenching of a dye labeled ss-DNA after the interaction with a GO surface was recovered in the presence of the complementary target DNA due to the interaction of complementary DNA strands, as presented in Figure 33. The presence of a noncomplementary ss-DNA has no effect on the situation of the hybrid. (145)

Figure 33

Figure 33. Schematic representation of the target-induced fluorescence change of a dye labeled ssDNA/GO hybrid. FAM is the fluorescein-based fluorescent dye. Reprinted with permission from ref 145. Copyright 2009 Wiley-VCH.

Pumera et al. have also developed G platforms for the detection using as detection techniques the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) (146-149) or the redox properties of GO. (150) Here, a very sensitive detection technique such as EIS and hairpin shaped DNA probes, which offer high selectivity, are combined successfully in the detection of immunoglobulin (IgG) and DNA single nucleotide polymorphism, which is correlated to the development of Alzheimer’s disease.
A very simple electrochemical detection of a DNA sequence is described in Figure 34. The surface of three electrodes was covered by ssDNA through π–π interactions and then was exposed to complementary, one-mismatch target, and noncomplementary target DNA, respectively. The three electrodes then are exposed to a suspension of GO nanoplatelets. The electrode with the complementary DNA strands has significantly different behavior due to the interactions of the complementary DNA strands. In fact, the interaction of the complementary DNA strands favors the formation of double strands on the electrode surface, which have much lower conjugation ability with the free GO nanoplatelets in comparison with the electrode exposed to the noncomplementary target that remains covered by single strands. This different behavior in the electrochemical reduction of GO was recorded by cyclic voltammetry. (150)

Figure 34

Figure 34. Electrochemical behavior of GO nanoplatelets after the interaction with ssDNA modified electrodes exposed to (a) complementary, (b) one-mismatch, and (c) noncomplementary targets. Reprinted with permission from ref 150. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

In a different approach as regards their interaction with biomolecules, GO has been presented to work successfully as modulators against protein misfolding and aggregations known as amyloidosis which, are correlated with Alzheimer’s (151) and other similar diseases. (152, 153) GO has been shown to prevent in vitro the amyloid fibril formation in peptide solution thanks to noncovalent interactions between graphenic nanostructures and peptides that overcome peptide interactions. Furthermore, according to recent work, the modulation effect of GO seems to be size dependent with the large GO nanostructures having a better function on Aβ33–44 aggregation than GO with size of less than 50 nm (see Figure 35). (154)

Figure 35

Figure 35. AFM images showing (a) the formation of fibrils after aggregation in a solution of Aβ33–44 peptide and (b) the absence of fibrils when in the peptide solution with GO nanoplatelets. Reprinted with permission from ref 154. Copyright 2015 Wiley VCH.

4.3 Functionalization with Drugs

An interesting application of graphenic nanostructures is their utility as platforms for the stabilization and the delivery of organic molecules that are used as drugs in therapeutic protocols. This specific role needs two important requirements from the graphenic nanostructures: a covalent or a noncovalent interaction with the organic molecules and the necessary hydrophilicity that promotes the easy dispersion of the hybrid in water or biological fluids. The hydrophilic character of GO is ensured by its carboxylate and hydroxylate groups, while pristine G or rGO has to be functionalized with hydrophilic groups or polymers before their use as drug delivery platforms. As regards the immobilization of the molecules, noncovalent interactions such as π–π stacking are preferable in most cases (i.e., precondition of the aromatic character of the molecule) because the release of the molecules is much easier to manipulate in comparison with that of covalently bonded molecules on the graphenic surface. Ramisol is an example of an aromatic organic molecule with antimicrobial and antioxidant activity that can be attached to G by π–π stacking. (155) The three carboxylates, present at the ends of the molecule, offer the necessary water solubility for the pristine G nanosheets (see Figure 36). (155)

Figure 36

Figure 36. (a) Molecular structure of Ramisol and the hybrid with a G layer. (b) Dispersion of the hybrid in water with different ratios. Reprinted with permission from ref 155. Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.

Hypocrellins are naturally occurring perylenequinonoid pigments that have been intensively studied as photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy. They include two similar molecular structures, hypocrellin A and B, and their major advantage is the very high quantum yield in the production of singlet oxygen. Although hypocrellins are highly active toward many kinds of tumor cells, their use in vivo is almost prohibited by its poor solubility in water. Zhou et al. (156) showed that hypocrellins can be made more water-soluble by interaction with a GO surface mainly by π–π interaction as well as hydrogen bonds between the hydrogen and the oxygen groups of both components (see Figure 37). In vitro experiments showed an effective uptake of GO/HB into the tumor cells and the subsequent damage upon irradiation. (154)

Figure 37

Figure 37. (a) Molecular structure of hypocrellin A and B. (b) Schematic representation of the GO/HB hybrid. Reprinted with permission from ref 156. Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V.

Water dispersible PEGylated graphene nanoribbons have been also used as platforms for the effective delivery of lucanthone (a thioxanthone-based antitumor drug that targets base excision repair enzyme APE-1 (Apurinic endonuclease-1)) into glioblastoma multiformae (GBM) cells. The aromatic character of lucanthone favors the stabilization of large amounts of the drug on the graphenic platform by π stacking (310 μm onto each mg of G material). (157)
Quercetin is a natural product of the family of bioflavonoids found in fruits and vegetables. It is well-known for its antioxidant and anticancer activity as well as for a broad range of health benefits. Even though quercetin has hydroxyl groups, it has low solubility in water and serious instability in the intestinal fluids. Rahmanian et al. (158) showed that quercetin can be immobilized onto a GO surface by π stacking, and the formed hybrid showed the necessary stability in physiological solutions and no toxicity in vitro.
Enhanced hydrophilic character and biocompatibility can be achieved with GO after its covalent functionalization by PEG chains. The PEGylated GO was then modified with an insoluble aromatic molecule SN38 (a captothesin analogue) with anticancer activity, and water solubility was achieved. (159) The anticancer drug CPT has been also immobilized on pristine G nanosheets functionalized by dihydroxy phenyl groups that induce hydrophilicity. (160) Other drugs that have been attached by π–π stacking on G or GO surfaces are doxorubicin (161) and ellipticine. (162)
Koninti et al. (162) have presented the effective loading of ellipticine (an anticancer drug) on GO and its release to intracellular biomolecules like DNA/RNA. Ellipticine (E) is an aromatic alcaloid that is stable in two forms (i.e., neutral and protonated), intercalates DNA, and acts as topoisomerase II inhibitor (see Figure 38). E is characterized by a strong dual photoluminescence while its λmax moves between green and blue or dark blue upon interaction of the molecule with GO, proteins, DNA or RNA, and sugar. As presented schematically in Figure 38, when the green emoting protonated E (λmax = 520 nm) is immobilized on GO in the neutral form by π–π interactions, it is not fully quenched as expected but still emits blue light with λmax at 450 nm. The interaction of DNA or RNA with the GO/E sample resulted in the return of the green fluorescence emission (λmax = 520 nm) in the complex showing the progressive release of E from GO surface and its strong interaction with these biomolecules. The addition of serum albumin protein (HSA) in the GO/E sample strengthened the luminescence of the complex, which is not shifted in the presence of DNA, showing that the protein can protect E from unwanted release (see Figure 38). (162)

Figure 38

Figure 38. (a) Neutral and protonated forms of ellipticine. (b) Photoluminescence of E free and after its π–π interaction with GO and changes in the presence of HSA, DNA, RNA, or HSA and DNA. Reprinted with permission from ref 162. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

4.4 Functionalization toward 3D Superstructures

Noncovalent interactions have been used for a special kind of nanoarchitecture creating superstructures based on G or GO nanosheets. In these structures, several aromatic molecules have been used as bridges, linkers, and spacers between graphenic sheets and other surfaces.
Noncovalent interaction has often been used to promote the use of small aromatic molecules such as pyrene derivatives as linkers for the connection of graphenic layers to other bodies. Chia et al. (163) have presented a pyrene derivative as a linker between G and glucose oxidase in a bioelectrochemical sensor of glucose (see Figure 39).

Figure 39

Figure 39. Pyrene links graphene and glucose oxidase through π–π stacking. Reprinted with permission from ref 163. Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.

In a similar approach, pyrene groups can form a bridge between G layers and a gold electrode (see Figure 40). (164, 165)

Figure 40

Figure 40. Pyrene interconnection between G and gold electrode. Reprinted with permission from ref 164. Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V.

Porphyrin functionalized rGO has also been used as biosensor for glucose in human serum thanks to its excellent electrocatalytic activity toward the reduction of dissolved oxygen. (166) Thanks to their aromatic part, cyclophanes can be entrapped between graphenic layers forming a characteristic host–guest 3D superstructure. The driving force here is the π–π interactions between the aromatic system of cyclophane and that of CBDAP4+/GO. A cyclophane with diazapyrenium and benzene units (see Figure 41) has been shown to interact effectively with GO nanosheets forming a supramolecular organogel. The position of cyclophane between the two GO nanosheets is suggested by the arising distance of 13.3 Å as estimated by the powder X-ray diffraction analysis of the superstructure. (167)

Figure 41

Figure 41. (a) Structure of a cyclophane with diazapyrenium units (CBDAP4+), (b) photo of CBDAP4+/GO gel, and (c) representation of the possible position of cyclophane/CBDAP between GO layers. Reprinted with permission from ref 167. Copyright 2014 Wiley-VCH.

4.5 Functionalization with Carbon Nanoallotropes

Carbon nanotubes have a strong aromatic character that promotes π–π interactions, although their curved shape deteriorates this trend. In general, there is a remarkable noncovalent interaction between carbon nanotubes and G nanostructures that leads to stable superstructures of these carbon hybrids. Several nanoarchitectured aerogels, foams, thin films, membranes, and paper-like sheets constructed by a combination of graphenic nanostructures and carbon nanotubes have been described in a recent review. (168) For example, the presence of dispersed SWNTs in a suspension of GO in water during hydrothermal reduction of the GO to rGO resulted in the formation of an aerogel superstructure after solvent removal by a freeze-drying procedure (see Figure 42). (169)

Figure 42

Figure 42. Schematic representation of aerogel formation toward the rGO/SWNT hybrid. Reprinted with permission from ref 169. Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.

Georgakilas et al. has recently developed a hybrid nanostructure by combining hydroxy functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) with pristine G through π–π interactions; the as-formed material exhibited high dispersibility in water and remarkable electrical conductivity (see Figure 43). (170) The hydrophobic G nanosheets are covered by the hydrophilic MWNTs affording a hydrophilic hybrid. Furthermore, the MWNTs act as conductive interconnectors between the G layers, improving the conductivity of the final hybrid. (170)

Figure 43

Figure 43. (a) Formation of G/MWNTs-f-OH hybrid and (b) its dispersion in water. (c) Graphene precipitate without MWNTs-f-OH following the same procedure and (d) the hybrid in ethylene glycol at high concentration. Reprinted with permission from ref 170. Copyright 2015 Wiley-VCH.

Hydrophilic GO has been also used for the creation of stable dispersions of nonpolar pristine carbon nanotubes in water through π–π interactions. (171) The electron acceptor [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) is the most commonly used fullerene derivative in bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells (BHJ-PSC). (172-175) G could be used in combination with PCBM, offering an excellent road for charge transportation during the solar cell function. Yang et al. (176) used a pyrene derivative of PCBM for its better adhesion onto rGO through π–π stacking, although fullerene derivatives could be also stacked onto the G surface (see Figure 44).

Figure 44

Figure 44. Schematic representation of the two possible conformations of the pyrene-PCBM/rGO hybrid: (a) C60 is attached on the graphenic surface simultaneously with the pyrene stacking, and (b) C60 is kept far from G and pyrene. Reprinted with permission from ref 176. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

From the two possible configurations presented, microscopic and spectroscopic data show that the proposed structure is that where C60 is kept far from the G surface and pyrene is the adhesion medium. The use of the hybrid in BHJ solar cell increases the efficiency 15%, while the use of pyrene-PCBM or rGO separately decreases the efficiency. However, as mentioned above, C60 moieties can be grafted on graphenic surfaces by π-stacking without the use of other aromatic linkers. A simple grinding of a mixture of GO and C60 led to the formation of a GO/C60 hybrid, which is stable in water at significant concentrations due to the high hydrophilicity of GO that dominates over the hydrophobic character of C60. The GO/C60 hybrid has been used as substrate for the immobilization of phosphotungstic acid (PTA); this material is then electrodeposited to form a thin film electrode of the PTA/GO/C60 composite. PTA is a highly active redox catalyst; therefore, the use of the PTA/GO/C60 composite showed enhanced catalytic activity toward the electrochemical redox reactions of several organic compounds such as dopamine, ascorbic acid, uric acid, etc. (177)
Recently, a few-layer G/nanodiamond (FLG/NDs) hybrid has been prepared as a carbon-based catalyst for the steam-free dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene. The enhanced amount of nanodiamonds that are dispersed on FLG surface is promoted by the large number of defects and vacancies of the FLG. The specific surface area of the hybrid is 330 m2 g–1, much larger than that of pure FLG, which is about 30 m2 g–1, because NDs are inserted between the FLG layers and prevent restacking. Acting as catalyst, the hybrid showed 4 times higher dehydrogenation activity as compared to unsupported NDs (see Figure 45). (178)

Figure 45

Figure 45. SEM and TEM micrographs of (a,d) bulk nanodiamonds, (b,e) few-layer graphene (FLG), and (c,f) the FLG/NDs hybrid. Reprinted with permission from ref 178. Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.

Finally, π–π and hydrophobic interactions haven been shown to be responsible for the strong attachment on GO of small polyaromatic and oxygenated species, which are coproduced during the oxidative procedure of graphite and usually called oxidative debris. (179) Many researchers have studied the last years the role of the oxidative debris in several properties of the as-prepared GO, revealing a significant contribution such as in water dispersibility, (180) fluorescence, (181) electroactivity, (182) and chemical reactivity. (183) In contrast with the early suggestions about the structure of GO, recent studies have shown that the product of the strong oxidation procedure that was applied on graphite according to the known well-established methods such as Staudenmaier, Hofmann, Hummers, and Tour oxidations consisted mainly of poorly oxidized large G nanosheets and highly oxidized relatively small aromatic species, which are strongly attached on the surface of GO. It is concluded that most of the oxygen functionalities on the product of graphite oxidation are concentrated on these small polyaromatic species. The so-called oxidative debris has a humic- or fulvic-like structure with carboxy, hydroxyl, and epoxy functionalities anchored to the edges. Because of their large number of hydrophilic oxygen groups, they act as surfactant and contribute to the dispersibility of GO in water. Consequently, pure GO nanosheets that arise after removal of debris by ultrasonication are not so poorly dispersible in water and more electrically conductive than before debris removal. (179) In addition, Coluci et al. (183) have shown that pure GO is much more effective in noncovalent interactions.
Pumera et al. (182) showed by using cyclic voltametry that a stepwise decrement in the inherent electroactivity of GO is observed by increasing the ultrasonication time from 2 to 24 h, which is attributed to the analogous removal of oxidative debris, concluding that inherent electroactivity came mostly from the oxidation debris (see Figure 46).

Figure 46

Figure 46. Schematic representation that shows how the removal of oxidative debris is correlated with the reduced electroactivity of GO in cyclic voltametry. Reprinted with permission from ref 182. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

4.6 Functionalization with 2D Graphene Analogues

The tremendous interest in G inspired researchers to develop 2D inorganic monolayers from transition metal oxides and dichalcogenides that have a layered structure. (69, 184, 185) The atomic thin layers are constructed by covalent bonds between transition metals such as Ni, V, W, Mo, Nb, Bi, Ta, and oxygens or nonmetallic elements such as S, Te, and Se. The layers are held together by van der Waals interactions. Although the layered structure and the properties of these inorganic compounds were known several decades ago, it was only recently confirmed that the monolayered structures can be stable. Additionally, these materials exhibit interesting electronic, magnetic, optical, and mechanical properties different from their 3D analogues. For example, bulk molybdenum sulfide (MoS2) is an indirect band gap semiconductor, while a MoS2 monolayered structure has a direct band gap and strong photoluminescence. (186) This observation gave the necessary motivation for the development of inorganic 2D materials for potential application in optoelectronics devices, catalysis, photovoltaics, batteries, etc. A recent review on 2D materials has been presented by Gupta et al. (184) where synthetic methods, characterization techniques, properties, and applications are described.
Supporting the similarity with G, 2D inorganic materials can be produced by methods such as mechanical cleavage, (187-189) liquid phase exfoliation (see Figure 47 and Figure 48), (69, 190, 191) chemical vapor deposition (CVD), (192, 193) and molecular beam epitaxy. (194)

Figure 47

Figure 47. (a–c) Low-resolution TEM images of BN, MoS2, and WS2 layered flakes. (d–f) High-resolution TEM images of BN, MoS2, and WS2 monolayers. The insets show fast Fourier transforms of the images. (g–i) Butterworth-filtered images of sections of the images in panels (d), (e), and (f), respectively. Reprinted with permission from ref 190. Copyright 2011 American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Figure 48

Figure 48. Schematic representation of three similar liquid exfoliation processes based on (a) intercalation, (b) ion exchange, and (c) ultrasonic exfoliation. Reprinted with permission from ref 69. Copyright 2013 American Association for the Advancement of Science.

The next step following the deconstruction of graphite and inorganic layered materials down to G and inorganic monolayers, respectively, was the reorganization of the different monolayers into new 3D or few layered 2D heterostructured hybrids with combined properties. The advantage of this research is that the properties of the final hybrid can be predetermined by a careful selection of the starting components and the way that they are placed in the hybrid. Up to now, the most used methods for the development of layered heterostructures are CVD growth, (195, 196) and the mechanical transfer or deposition of chemically exfoliated 2D crystals layer by layer. (197) One of the simplest ways to make a hybrid heterostructure is illustrated for the G/MoS2 hybrid material, which is produced by bringing in contact a glass slide with micrometer-sized exfoliated G nanosheets and a Si/SiO2 substrate decorated by MoS2 layers mechanically deposited. (198, 199) The G/MoS2 hybrid combines the electrical properties of G with the optical activity of semiconductor. Interestingly, a persisted photoconductivity in G was induced, which can be reverted back to the dark state by a voltage pulse application; this results in an electrically controlled photoinduced memory device (see Figure 49). (198)

Figure 49

Figure 49. Schematic representation of the device with G and MoS2. Reprinted with permission from ref 198. Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V.

On the other hand, the MoS2/G heterostructure where MoS2 is covered by a layer of G has been applied for the ultrasensitive detection of DNA hybridization, (200) as a nanobiosensor, (201) and a p–n junction. (202)
Tungsten sulfide (WS2) has been also deposited as few layered nanosheet supported on rGO through a hydrothermal procedure. The rGO/WS2 hybrid heterostructure showed enhanced electrochemical and rate capability performance as an anode for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). The characterization of the hybrid is based on X-ray diffraction patterns and Raman spectra, while the two components were also indicated by TEM micrographs. X-ray diffraction mostly indicates the hexagonal structure of WS2 monolayer, while the presence of the (002), (100), and (110) reflections are due to the few layered structure of WS2 (see Figure 50). The decreased crystallinity of the hybrid due to the presence of rGO in the hybrid is also observed. The Raman spectrum of the hybrid showed the characteristic G and D bands of graphene at 1585 and 1350 cm–1, respectively, and the characteristic band of WS2 at 350 and 415 cm–1 due to the E2g and A12 modes, respectively. (203)

Figure 50

Figure 50. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns and (b) Raman spectra of bare WS2 and the hybrids WS2/rGO in two different ratios. Reprinted with permission from ref 203. Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V.

The layered structure of these materials offers the opportunity to combine more than two different nanostructures in a 3D assembly. Recently, Roy et al. (204) have shown the construction of a field-effect transistor combining G nanosheets with MoS2 and h-BN monolayers. G has the role of source/drain and the top-gate contacts, h-BN is the top-gate dielectric, and MoS2 is the active channel material (see Figure 51).

Figure 51

Figure 51. Schematic representation of a field-effect transistor constructed by graphene, MoS2, and h-BN layers. Reprinted with permission from ref 204. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

4.7 Functionalization with Nanostructures

It is well-known that the use of nanoparticles in various applications depends on a multitude of factors such as size, number of facets, facet order, shape, surface area, etc. (205) These factors are in turn dependent on a vast number of reaction conditions such as temperature, concentration, time, precursors, and many more. Additionally, in many applications, the use of nanoparticles requires immobilization on a substrate surface. In this regard, G and GO can act as a substrate for nanoparticles in many applications where the inherent properties of G, such as conductivity or anchoring sites, could be beneficial. (206, 207)
Depending on the G substrate used, the nanoparticles can either be deposited directly onto the surface or be grown on the surface. For example, it may be easier to grow nanoparticles directly onto the surface when using GO as a substrate, as it has multiple oxygen functionalities where seeding can take place. (208) On the other hand, it may be easier to deposit already grown nanoparticles onto pristine G as it should lack vast numbers of seeding sites. (209) Obviously, these two examples are broad generalizations, but they demonstrate the uniqueness of G as a substrate for nanoparticle deposition.
It should be pointed out here that in many reports the nanoparticle deposition claimed as noncovalent could in fact be covalent bonding occurring between the G surface and the nanoparticle. However, multiple groups have not offered detailed confirmation of either covalent or noncovalent bonding between the G surface and the nanoparticle. As such, we present here materials that have been reported either as (i) noncovalent interactions or as (ii) interactions that could be noncovalent based on prior studies.

4.7.1 Synthetic Methods toward Graphene/Nanostructure Hybrids

Multiple methods have been developed to deposit nanoparticles onto G ranging from the traditionally applied chemical solution deposition methods (210-212) to electrochemical, (213) ultrasonication, (214) and laser synthesis (215) deposition methods, among many others. In this section, a few of the novel techniques toward G nanoparticle materials are described.
Liu et al. (216) have demonstrated the simultaneous reduction of GO and deposition of Ag nanoparticles onto the rGO surface using an electron beam method. The authors of this study showed that the resistivity of the Ag/rGO material as well as the Ag nanoparticle size decreased with an increase in electron beam radiation dosage (167.96 and 27.52 nm at 70 and 350 kGy, respectively). The benefits of this method are apparent with the short time needed for synthesis as well as the ease of nanoparticle manipulation by dosage variation. In another study, Hui and co-workers (214) have shown that Ag nanoparticles of varying sizes can be uniformly deposited onto a GO substrate using ultrasonication in the presence of Vitamin C as a reducing agent. The authors showed that, in general, the size of the Ag nanoparticles is related to ultrasonication time with longer times resulting in larger nanoparticles. This observation of increasing size with ultrasonication time was attributed to the Ostwald ripening process. However, it should be noted that at sonication times above 20 min, both small and large nanoparticles are obtained, and a decrease in uniformity is also observed. The size of Ag nanoparticles deposited on rGO surfaces has been elaborated on further by Haider et al. (217) who showed that by using very dilute concentrations of AgNO3 in sequential reduction reactions, a nanoparticle size of 4–50 nm can be obtained. This size modification was shown to be critical to the antibacterial properties of the Ag nanoparticle-rGO material against E. coli with an average size of 20 nm proving most efficient.
In another study, Shi et al. (218) have shown that a CuS/rGO composite can be prepared using a sonochemical method where CuCl2 and GO were dispersed in ethylene glycol with the use of thioacetamide as a reducing agent. The as-prepared material exhibited a large surface area of 993.5 m2 g–1 and a much improved methylene blue photocatalytic activity as compared to bare CuS nanoparticles. It should be noted that these sonochemical methods are probably beneficial toward industrial scale synthesis as they can proceed on a large scale and at low synthesis temperatures. GO has also proved to be a suitable substrate for the challenging synthesis of single phase nanoparticles such as Cu2ZnSnS4, as demonstrated by Thangaraju and colleagues. (219) In this study, they showed that Cu2ZnSnS4 nanoparticles can either be deposited on GO by sonication in oleylamine or grown in situ using a hot injection method under a N2atmosphere. The benefit of these growth methods for the Cu2ZnSnS4 material is that it affords a relatively simple approach whereby one is able to tune the absorption nature of the optoelectronic material.
Multiple groups have coated nanoparticles with polymers or other surfactants, which can then be attached to G-based templates. For example, Bera et al. (220) have shown that rGO can be functionalized with 0D, 1D, and 2D CdS nanoparticles; in this method, the nanoparticles are functionalized with 4-aminothiophenol before sonication with GO and subsequent hydrazine reduction. It should be noted that surfactant use is not limited to nanoparticle modification, with Wang and colleagues (221) showing that Pt nanoparticle decorated 3D G assemblies can be obtained when the amphoteric surfactant sodium lauryl aminopropionate (SLA) is used. Initially, the 3D GO structure is formed by sonicating GO with SLA. This formed 3D material was then modified with Pt nanoparticles using a hydrothermal synthesis method, which employs the added sodium lauryl aminopropionate as a reducing agent. On the other hand, it is also possible to modify the G surface with an organic functionality that is then able to attach a nanoparticle through well-known ionic interactions. In this way, Atar and colleagues (222) have shown that a GO modified using 2-aminoethanethiol can be successfully used to attach Fe@Ag core–shell nanoparticles through formation of an Ag–S ionic bond. Through functionalization of GO nanoribbons with cysteamine, it has been shown that Ag nanoparticles can not only be attached to the cysteamine chain through Ag–S bonds, but also on the GO basal surface. (223) These Ag nanoparticle functionalized GO nanoribbons then assemble into cube-like Ag nanoparticles agglomerates, which are believed to form through the initial cubic shape formation of the cysteamine functionalized GO nanoribbons.
The synthesis of CVD G with nanoparticles deposited on one side (asymmetrically) or both sides (symmetrically) has been reported by Toth et al. (224) Remarkably, the authors showed that in the symmetric deposition of nanoparticles, it is possible to deposit either the same metal or different metals. To obtain the single sided deposition, the authors used a redox reaction, which relied on the simultaneous oxidative etching of the Cu foil on which the G was grown and the reductive deposition of the desired nanoparticles. To deposit the second metal on the opposite side, the asymmetrically deposited G is floated on an aqueous solution containing the desired metal salt; after this flotation an organic layer containing a reducing agent is layered over the G sheet. As such, the second deposition occurs at an aqueous–organic liquid/liquid interface (see Figure 52).

Figure 52

Figure 52. Schematic of the synthesis method used to prepare symmetrically deposited CVD graphene sheets with different metals on either side. Reprinted with permission from ref 224. Copyright 2015 Wiley-VCH.

The layer by layer self-assembly of negatively charged CdS quantum dots onto GO modified with poly(allylamine hydrochloride), that is, positively charged, has been reported by Xiao et al. (225) toward forming nanofilms with photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic applications. This self-assembly method affords the electrodes formed with a highly efficient charge separation under photoelectrochemical conditions due to the stacked nature of the material, which results in close interfacial contact between the rGO and the CdS. The improved charge separation was also noted in the photocatalytic reduction of aromatic nitro compounds, with the CdS/rGO layered material showing almost double efficiency as compared to the layered CdS sample. One of the major challenges facing G materials in photoelectrochemical water splitting applications is the creation of uniform films with active sites for the catalytic oxygen and/or hydrogen reactions, and as such this layer-by-layer method holds promise for future applications.
The deposition of nanoparticles onto doped and/or functionalized G is another important and growing field of research in G nanoparticle systems. In this field of study, noble metal nanoparticles have been deposited on various doped G materials. Normally, nitrogen-doped G is used, see section 4.7.2, (213, 226) and this is probably due to the ease with which N-doped G can be synthesized. (227, 228) The deposition of Pt nanoparticles onto thiol functionalized thermally reduced graphene oxide (TrGO) by the thermal decomposition of the organometallic precursor methylcyclopentadienyl-trimethylplatinum(IV) in ionic liquid systems has been demonstrated by Marquardt et al. (229) In this synthesis procedure, thiol functionalized TrGO with varying amounts of thiol functionality can be achieved using various sulfur sources; it should be noted that the sulfur source used determines the thermal stability of the prepared materials during the high temperature Pt deposition process. The authors believe these methods can be applied to produce catalysts toward fuel cell technology, and as the materials display high thermal stability during Pt deposition this seems a reasonable assumption. In another high temperature process, Bi nanoparticle enriched nanoporous carbon has been formed on TrGO through the thermal decomposition of a Zn containing zeolitic imidazolate framework-8/GO hybrid material, followed by infiltration and chemical reduction of Bi(NO3)3. (230) This material was then applied in the fabrication of a selective and sensitive heavy metal electrochemical sensor.
A study by Wei and co-workers (231) has shown that electrochemically exfoliated G can be functionalized with Si, Fe3O4, and Pt nanoparticles by use of the solution-processable polyaniline emeraldine base (PANB), which provides functionalization sites. The use of the PANB is interesting as it leads to uniform coating of nanoparticles on the G surface, while the coating concentration can be determined by adjusting the ratio of PANB used in the synthesis step. An additional use of the PANB is that it provides unique electrical properties to the G by acting as a dopant. Because of these properties, the Si/PANB/G material was successfully applied in LIBs as an anode, and these properties are further discussed in section 4.7.2.
The growth of precisely aligned AuCN nanowires on CVD G has been reported by Lee et al., (232) who used a simple room-temperature solution growth method where the graphene substrate is floated on the surface of a precursor containing solution. The nanowires formed have dimensions of approximately 94 nm × 10 nm × 3 nm, and are aligned along the zigzag lattice directions of the graphene. This result is of interest as the precise control of nanoparticles in G-based materials is essential toward novel applications of nanoparticles, as well as G-nanoparticle systems. Additionally, they showed that the G–AuCN nanowire system can be used to create precise G nanoribbons by oxidizing the unprotected G using O2 plasma and then removing the AuCN. The authors also noted that the grain boundaries of G can be visualized using this nanowire technique, with similar results reported by Yu et al. (233) who showed that the deposition of Au nanoparticles using thermal evaporation can be used to visualize grain boundaries. Importantly, in this study, the authors showed that different types of grain boundaries and wrinkles on the G surface can be differentiated; this is in contrast to previous G boundary visualization studies, which have focused only on defects and not the type of defect present. (234-236)
A novel method to obtain Ni3S2/rGO 3D frameworks using bacteria has been presented by Zhang and colleagues. (237) In this study, Bacillus subtilis was mixed with an aqueous solution of nickel acetate and GO, after which the solution was reduced and spray deposited onto a Ni foam substrate (see Figure 53). This porous Ni3S2/rGO material was then applied as a supercapacitor with a specific capacitance of 1424 F g–1 at a current density of 0.75 A g–1. Additionally, with cycling, that is, 3000 cycles at 15 A g–1, 89.6% of the initial capacitance of 1242 F g–1 was still delivered.

Figure 53

Figure 53. Schematic showing the synthesis of the Ni3S2/rGO 3D framework. Reprinted with permission from ref 237. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

Nanoparticles coated with a carbon layer are of importance to Li-ion batteries as well as other applications. (238-240) Sengar and colleagues (240) have shown that metal (Pd or Cu)/G core/shell materials can be produced using a continuous flow gas-phase synthesis setup. The use of a spark generator using Pd or Cu electrodes was applied in this setup to form the metal core, and as such it is possible that this method could be expanded to multiple other metal/G core/shell materials. An additional benefit of this setup is that it employs an electrostatic precipitator, which allowed the authors to deposit the as-formed composite material on any substrate desired. In a study by Moon and colleagues, (241) it has been shown that Au nanorods coated with rGO, formed using a Xe lamp irradiation process with ammonium hydroxide as a reducing agent, are far more impressive photoacoustic bioimaging agents than uncoated Au nanorods. The authors believe the photoacoustic signal in this material is amplified due to (i) rGO being a very efficient heat transfer layer, and (ii) the Au nanorods’ ability to enhance the light absorbing properties of the rGO.
The use of Pt nanoparticles to combat restacking of G sheets was reported early on by Si and Samulski. (242) These authors showed that the capacitance of this Pt–G material can be increased 19 times as compared to stacked G sheets. In a similar manner, Au nanoparticles deposited on ErGO (243) and Co3O4 nanoparticles deposited on G (244) have been utilized as spacers to prevent G sheet restacking, thereby increasing the capacitance of the as-formed materials. Likewise, a report by Liu et al. (245) has shown that ultrasmall Ni(OH)2 nanoparticles can be used to prevent restacking in rGO sheets when forming a Ni(OH)2–rGO material. Interestingly, in this report the authors showed that the Ni(OH)2 nanoparticles can also be used as a recyclable sacrificial spacer, with the rGO material formed using an acid dissolution process of the Ni(OH)2–rGO material maintaining the nonstacked structure.

4.7.2 Decoration of Graphene and Graphene Oxide with Nanostructures for Catalytic Applications

Besides the novel techniques mentioned in the previous section, traditional solution-based methods are being developed for G/nanoparticle systems, and exciting developments are being obtained when templates are used. For example, it has been shown by Tiwari et al. (246, 247) that ultrasmall Pt nanoclusters (∼1 nm) and Pt nanodendrites can be deposited onto a GO scaffold using ssDNA as a template. In these synthetic methods, the authors showed that the Pt nanostructure formed was determined by the Pt salt used in the synthesis (see Figure 54). Remarkably, these systems prove to be excellent catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), with catalytic activities higher than the 2015 U.S. Department of Energy targets. Importantly, these catalysts also exhibited an impressive stability (∼95% after 10 000 cycles) when compared to commercially available ORR catalysts (∼40% after 10 000 cycles), thereby showing their applicability in commercial systems.

Figure 54

Figure 54. Synthesis of (a) Pt nanodendrites and (b) Pt nanoclusters deposited onto GO using DNA as a template. Panel (a) reprinted with permission from ref 246. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. Panel (b) reprinted with permission from ref 247. Copyright 2013 Nature Publishing Group.

One well-known benefit of using graphene-based materials as a scaffold for nanoparticles in catalytic reactions is the enhanced stability that this affords the nanoparticles. For example, this phenomenon has been noted in the research conducted by Huang et al. (248) who showed that Pd nanoparticles deposited on chemically rGO (CrGO) show enhanced stability in electrocatalytic activity toward the ORR in the presence of ethanol as compared to commercially available catalysts, that is, a current density of 0.055 versus 0.007 A mg–1. This composite material was formed through a citrate catalyzed redox reaction initiated by irradiation using a 500 W mercury lamp, with the authors showing that this synthesis procedure can be extended toward Au–CrGO and Pt–CrGO composites. In another study, Yin and co-workers (249) have shown that Au, Pd, and Pt nanoclusters can be deposited onto CrGO sheets without the use of surfactants by simple sonication of dilute AuCl43–, PdCl42–, and PtCl64– solutions with CrGO dispersions. The Au/CrGO material was tested as an ORR catalyst, and while the performance of this catalyst was not comparable to commercial Pt/C ORR catalysts, it displayed an enhanced tolerance to methanol as well as a higher stability (16% versus 50% activity loss after 40 000 s).
The oxidation of CO over a rGO supported Pd nanoparticle catalyst has been demonstrated by Liu and co-workers. (250) The catalyst was produced using an impregnation and hydrogen reduction method, with the authors showing that the Pd surface is essential to the oxidation even though the catalyst presents with a layer of PdOx. The as-produced catalysts were shown to be very stable for CO oxidation at temperatures of 120 °C with no observable decrease in catalytic activity even after 24 h time on stream; in contrast, at 100 °C a decrease in activity was noted, which was attributed to difficulty in dissociation of adsorbed O2 on the Pd nanoparticles. Similar studies have shown that Pt–rGO (251) and Pt–Ni–rGO (252) can be used in the oxidation of CO, although these studies did not report long-term catalytic stability.
Most high activity ORR catalysts reported make use of precious transition metals; however, high cost of these metals limits their application, and as such the search for cheaper transition metals is highly desired. In this regard, Guo et al. (209) have shown that Co/CoO (8 nm core/1 nm shell) nanoparticles deposited onto a TrGO substrate display an activity equivalent to commercially available Pt/C ORR catalysts in alkaline media. The catalytic activity is determined not only by favorable interactions between the TrGO and the nanoparticles, but also size tuning of the Co/CoO core/shell. Interestingly, the ideal core/shell dimension could be obtained by simple exposure of the as-formed Co nanoparticles to ambient conditions, thereby avoiding costly and time-consuming tuning steps. Last, while these catalysts did degrade with time, their stability was far improved as compared to the commercial Pt/C catalyst and Co/CoO nanoparticles deposited on Ketjen carbon.
The use of doped graphene materials has garnered wide interest due to the intrinsic ORR catalytic activity of N-, S-, and P-doped G. (253-255) Doubt has been cast on this ORR activity being due to the G material, with Wang and colleagues (256, 257) showing that this activity is instead caused by trace metal impurities. Regardless, Zhou and co-workers (226) have shown that Ag nanoparticles can be deposited onto N-doped rGO using a simple solution method, and these materials outperform Ag nanoparticles deposited onto rGO as ORR catalysts. The authors of this study showed for the first time that there is a chemical interaction between the Ag nanoparticles and the N-doped CrGO. As this interaction is not present in the case of Ag/CrGO, Ag nanoparticles, and CrGO, the authors believe this Ag–N interaction is the origin of the ORR activity. This material is interesting as it is cheaper than traditional ORR catalysts and shows methanol tolerance, which is in contrast to commercially available Pt-based ORR catalysts that show negligible activity when methanol is introduced into the test system. In a related study, Jin et al. (213) have shown that Ag nanoclusters (∼2 nm) can be electrochemically deposited onto a N-doped GO surface using ssDNA as a template. These Ag–GO catalysts were then applied as ORR catalysts, and while these systems do not exhibit activities that can rival the Pt–GO-based systems, the authors did show that these Ag-based ORR catalysts are tolerant toward methanol, showing no decrease in catalytic activity.
A recent report by Duan and colleagues (207) has shown that not only is the doped graphene material important, but the catalytic activity can be further tuned by altering the nanoparticle shape. In this study, the authors utilized hydrothermal conditions with the addition of either 1-butanol, ethanol, or 1-pentanol in the presence of NH4OH to deposit sphere, cubic, or ellipsoid Mn3O4 nanoparticles onto N-doped CrGO, respectively. The ellipsoid Mn3O4 nanoparticle N-doped CrGO material exhibited an onset potential of −0.13 V and a current density of 11.69 mA cm–2 at −0.6 V, as compared to the cubic material, which exhibited an onset potential of −0.16 V and a current density of 9.38 mA cm–2. Additionally, as for the other N-doped G materials, the Mn3O4 containing catalyst displayed enhanced tolerance to methanol as compared to a commercial Pt/C ORR catalyst.
The application of G materials as catalysts in the important electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction (EHER) has been reported by various groups. (258-261) The use of Pt metal as the EHER catalyst is widely known; however, the cost of this metal requires innovative methods to either reduce its usage or replace it. In this vain, Bai and colleagues (262) have shown that Pd–Pt core–shell nanocube structures deposited onto rGO can be used as effective EHER catalysts. The authors showed that a 0.8 nm thin layer of Pt deposited onto a Pd nanocube resulted in the largest current density, and as such a large reduction in the Pt metal affords improved activity, which is desirable for industrial applications (see Figure 55). (260) The increased reactivity of this core–shell nanocube design is attributed to the surface polarization that occurs due to differences in the work functions between the Pt and Pd, which then increases the EHER performance of the Pt surface.

Figure 55

Figure 55. Polarization curves obtained for the Pt–Pd–rGO EHER catalysts, with different Pt thickness and equal Pd loading amounts. Pt–Pd–rGO I, Pt–Pd–rGO II, and Pt–Pd–rGO III show Pt layer thicknesses of 0.8, 1.8, and 3.2 nm, respectively. Reprinted with permission from ref 262. Copyright 2014 Wiley-VCH.

In attempts to replace Pt as the catalyst, Youn et al. (261) showed that Mo2C, Mo2N, and MoS2 nanoparticles can be deposited onto a CNT–GO support using a urea or thiourea-glass route. The as-obtained material was dried and calcined at 750 °C to afford Mo2C, Mo2N, or MoS2/CNT–TrGO catalysts, which were applied toward the EHER, with the Mo2C/CNT–TrGO catalysts affording the best activity of the three newly synthesized catalysts. It was further shown that the Mo2C/CNT–TrGO materials’ onset potential (62 mV) was far improved as compared to Mo2C deposited on CNT (120 mV), TrGO (150 mV), and carbon black (135 mV). This improvement in activity is believed to be due to the excellent conductivity of the CNT–TrGO support, as well as the three-dimensional stacking structure of the support. Building on this work, He and Tao (260) showed that MoC (∼2.5 nm) and Mo2C (∼5.0 nm) nanoparticles can be deposited onto TrGO surfaces, and these catalysts were found to be highly stable with a negligible decrease in current density after 20 h of continuous EHER catalysis. Yan et al. (263) have shown that a WN/rGO (3 nm WN nanoparticles) material can be phosphorylized post synthetically using NaH2PO2 as a phosphorus source in a furnace at 800 °C, and this resulting P–WN/rGO (4 nm WN nanoparticles) material can be used as an EHER catalyst. This phosphorylation step is beneficial, as it affords the catalyst enhanced stability upon recycling with only a 34 mV loss as compared to a 111 mV loss for the WN/rGO material after 5000 cycles. Additionally, a lower onset overpotential for the EHER is required for the P–WN/rGO material as compared to the WN/rGO material, that is, 46 versus 114 mV, respectively.
G-based materials have additionally been tested as methanol oxidation catalysts and hydrogen generation catalysts from formic acid, for application in fuel cells. (264, 265) Chen et al. (264) have shown that highly dispersed AgPd nanoparticles can be deposited onto a rGO surface using a Co3(BO3)2 coprecipitation and subsequent etching method. The authors showed that the coprecipitation and etching method prevents aggregation of the AgPd nanoparticles on the rGO surface. The resulting (Co6)Ag0.1Pd0.9/rGO catalyst exhibited an enhanced formic acid dehydrogenation activity as compared to the Ag0.1Pd0.9/rGO catalyst prepared using a direct deposition method. Interestingly, this catalyst exhibited the highest turnover frequency, 2756 h–1, reported for the formic acid dehydrogenation reaction at 323 K as compared to the previous 2623 h–1 reported for Pd/MSC-30. However, it should be noted that this trend is reversed at an operation temperature of 298 K, 453 versus 750 h–1. Yang et al. (265) have shown that preformed Pt nanoparticles can be deposited onto a sulfonated G (sG) support with a far greater density to give Pt/sG. The as-formed Pt/sG material was subsequently adhered to a glassy carbon electrode using poly(vinyl alcohol) and then applied as a methanol oxidation catalyst. The authors showed that the use of this sG support leads to an enhanced catalytic stability (9% activity loss) as compared to the use of an rGO support (∼20% activity loss). Additionally, the Pt/sG catalyst exhibited an enhanced catalytic activity as compared to Pt/C and Pt/rGO with mass activities after 200 cycles of 2156.54, 294.09, and 1162.03 mA mg–1 Pt, respectively. Utilizing a surfactant-less two-step solvothermal and microwave synthetic method, Chen et al. (266) have shown that a Pd@Pt core–shell nanoflower supported on rGO can be synthesized. Remarkably, the nanocrystals produced using this method exhibit an extremely high lattice matching ratio, and as such no grain boundary is observed and the material can be considered as a pseudo Pd–Pt alloy. The as-synthesized material was applied as a methanol oxidation catalyst and exhibited an impressive mass activity of 9.23 A mg–1 Pt with enhanced stability upon recycling as compared to other tested catalysts. The authors believe this enhanced activity is largely due to the surface-clean multimetallic nanocrystals produced in the surfactant free process.
The use of catalysts in organic reactions is very well-known, and as G has been shown to improve catalytic ability due to enhanced stability, there is an expanding field wherein G/nanoparticle systems are being applied in organic catalysis. For example, Moussa and colleagues (215) have shown that Suzuki–Miyaru, Heck, and Sonogashira cross-coupling can be achieved using Pd nanoparticles deposited on partially CrGO. In this study, the nanoparticles were deposited onto the GO surface, which was simultaneously reduced, through a redox reaction that was initiated by irradiation using a 532 nm laser source. It should be noted that, while these catalysts displayed extremely high activity, this activity dramatically decreased upon recycling with an average activity loss of ∼50% after 4 cycles. This loss in activity can be attributed to an increase in average particle size due to agglomeration, which in turn leads to a reduced catalytic surface area. In a related study, Metin and colleagues (267) have shown that Suzuki–Miyaru cross-coupling reactions can be catalyzed using a Ni/Pd core/shell nanoparticle system deposited on GO. These catalysts proved to be not only very stable and effective for the catalysis reactions probed, but they could easily be recycled with an efficiency of 98% conversion in the fifth reaction run. In another study, Putta and co-workers (268) have shown that the Suzuki–Miyaura and Heck–Mizoroki C–C cross-coupling reactions can take place in water under atmospheric conditions, when Pd nanoparticle catalysts are attached to rGO using cyclodextrin. This result is remarkable as previous studies using G-based materials have required the use of Schlenk apparatus and/or elevated pressures for the coupling to proceed. Last, Heck reactions have been catalyzed using catalysts consisting of Pd nanoparticles deposited on G foams manufactured using a gas–liquid interfacial plasma technique. (269) The use of G foam holds the benefit of an increased surface area as compared to Pd/rGO materials synthesized using the traditional solvothermal methods. Importantly, all of these C–C cross-coupling reactions utilizing G-based materials mentioned here do not require the use of phosphines, and as such are more environmentally benign.
The increased catalytic activity of G nanoparticle systems has been applied in sensors where an enhanced catalytic activity can lead to an improved limit of detection and/or sensitivity. (270) Duy-Thach and Chung (210) have shown that Pd nanocubes deposited onto a GO support with subsequent reduction can be utilized as a fast, reproducible, and sensitive hydrogen sensor. The sensor exhibited negligible response to O2, NO2, CO, CO2, and N2, thereby showing a good selectivity for H2 with a limit of detection of 6 ppm at a working temperature of 50 °C. This sensing mechanism is based on the well-known adsorption of H2 molecules on Pd, where this hydrogen adsorption in turn leads to improved electron transfer between the nanoparticle and the G surface. (271) As more electrons flow from the nanocube, there is a change in the rGO charge carrier density, which improves the sensitivity for H2 as the G material used in hydrogen detection is normally p-doped (see Figure 56). In another study, Li et al. (272) have shown that a highly dispersed PtPd nanoparticle rGO system synthesized using an ionic liquid functionalized GO can be used in the enzyme-less detection of glucose. The use of the ionic liquid functionalized GO is critical to the synthesis of the highly dispersed and small bimetallic nanoparticles, 3.4 nm for Pt(50)Pd(50)–IL(100)–rGO as compared to 6.3 nm for Pt(50)Pd(50)–rGO (see Figure 57). (272) At 0 V versus a Ag/AgCl electrode, the Pt(50)Pd(50)–IL(100)–rGO material exhibited a limit of detection of 2 μM for glucose, with negligible response toward the competing analytes ascorbic acid, uric acid, and dopamine.

Figure 56

Figure 56. Charge carrier density in a graphene sensor versus hydrogen concentration. Reprinted with permission from ref 271. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V.

Figure 57

Figure 57. Synthesis of rGO/Pt–Pd supported catalysts. Reprinted with permission from ref 272. Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V.

The use of graphene materials in enhanced photoelectrochemical hydrogen evolution has been demonstrated by multiple groups. (197, 273, 274) One method to improve the hydrogen evolution of p-type MoS2 catalysts is to deposit the MoS2 nanoparticles onto N-doped rGO, as Meng and colleagues (275) have shown. The authors of this study showed that the MoS2/N-doped rGO catalyst exhibited a 3-fold increase in activity as compared to the MoS2/rGO catalyst. As the surface areas of the catalysts are comparable, the authors concluded that this increase in performance must be attributable to the N-doped G. Wang et al. (276) have shown that the Au–P25–rGO complex can be prepared using a simple one-pot microwave assisted hydrothermal synthesis. Interestingly, this material was then applied in visible light hydrogen production, with the Au nanoparticles shifting the visible light response of the TiO2, which is normally only active in the UV region. (277) In the Au–P25–rGO sample, the rGO leads to an impressive improvement in the quantum efficiency, that is, 4.1% as compared to 2.4% for the Au–P25 sample.
An interesting method to simultaneously deposit Pd nanoparticles and dope nitrogen into G has been developed by Vinayan and colleagues. (278) In this synthesis procedure, the authors employed a simple solar exfoliation of a PdCl2/GO–melamine composite material using an ordinary convex lens to obtain Pd/N-doped solar rGO. This produced material was then tested as a hydrogen storage material, governed by the hydrogen spillover mechanism, and exhibited a hydrogen storage capacity of 4.3 wt % at 25 °C and 4 MPa.

4.7.3 Decoration of Graphene and Graphene Oxide with Nanostructures for Application in Lithium-Ion Batteries

Recent reviews by Tuček et al. (279) as well as others (280, 281) have highlighted the importance of G materials in LIBs. As such, this section should be considered as an update and highlight of these excellent reviews.
TiO2 is a cheap and environmentally friendly material with a large cycling ability that can be applied as a cathode material in LIBs, and as such Li and co-workers (208) have developed a sol–gel synthesis method to obtain highly dispersed and controllable 5 nm in size TiO2 (anatase phase) nanoparticles deposited on rGO. (208) This precise nanoparticle size control was obtained by adding tetrabutyl titanate to an ethanol dispersion of GO, which contained a small amount of ammonia as a reducing agent. The synthesized material was then applied in an LIB setup, as an anode, and exhibited a specific capacity of ∼94 mA h g–1 at 59 °C, which is in contrast to a mechanically mixed TiO2/rGO material that exhibited a specific capacity of ∼41 mA h g–1. This improvement in performance as compared to the mechanically mixed sample was attributed to an increase in surface area, G conductivity, smaller nanoparticle size, as well as G layer thickness, which was ≤3 layers. In a similar way, ultrasmall ∼5 nm MoO2 nanoparticles have been deposited onto TrGO to improve the slow lithium insertion kinetics and volume expansion that MoO2 anode materials usually suffer in LIBs. (282) In this study, the authors showed that not only decreasing the size of the MoO2, but the presence of the G support, improves the reversible capacity of the MoO2 material (765.3 mA h g–1 for MoO2/TrGO versus 533.9 mA h g–1 for MoO2). The one problem facing TiO2 use in LIBs is its low capacity; for this reason, Pan et al. have shown that the capacity can be increased when the TiO2 is coupled to a high capacity material such as Fe3O4 through codeposition of the nanoparticles onto exfoliated G sheets (EGS). (283) This TiO2–Fe3O4/EGS material was then applied as an anode in LIBs and delivered a reversible capacitance of 524 mA h g–1 at 1000 mA g–1, which is remarkably larger as compared to the value of 175 mA h g–1 at 100 mA g–1 reported by Li et al. (208) This work showed that the introduction of a high capacitance material with TiO2 is able to improve the overall capacitance while retaining a high cycling ability.
The use of Si in LIBs is of interest due to its high theoretical capacitance; however, this material expands rapidly on lithium ion adsorption, and as such its capacitance drops rapidly on cycling. (284) To prevent this expansion, Zhu and colleagues (285) have deposited 30 nm Si nanoparticles onto rGO using a magnesiothermic reduction reaction of a SiO2/GO composite at 700 °C. The ratio of magnesium to SiO2/GO composite material is critical to obtaining the desired product, with a 1:1 ratio providing the 30 nm Si nanoparticle/rGO material. This material was then applied as an anode in LIBs and showed a minimal decrease in capacitance of 1300 mA h g–1 at 100 mA g–1 after cycling at various current densities (see Figure 58). (285) Another method employed to improve the cycling capacity of Si has been demonstrated by Hassan and colleagues (286) who showed that Si nanowires can be deposited onto a Ni nanoparticle–TrGO support using a novel high temperature thermal shock and deposition method. Importantly, the material was coated with a 2 nm layer of amorphous carbon. When this material was then applied as an anode in LIBs, the material exhibited an improved cycling stability (550 mA h g–1 at 6.8 A g–1 for the 100th cycle), which is attributed to the synergy between the Si nanowires and the Ni–TrGO support. It is interesting to note that in this study the general morphology of the >100 nm long Si nanowires was retained, although significant fragmentation and swelling occurred, with this shape retention being attributed to the amorphous carbon layer coating the surface. To improve the stability of Si nanoparticles on electrochemically exfoliated G, a polyaniline emeraldine base layer has been used as described by Wei et al. (231) This material exhibited a reversible capacity of 1710 mA h g–1 at 0.42 A g–1, and a capacity retention of 86% after 100 cycles. In a study by Zhou et al., (287) it has been shown that G sheets can be bridged and orientated using Si nanoparticles, which act as hinges between the sheets. In this synthesis, the Si nanoparticles coated with bovine serum albumin and GO are dispersed together, and then electrostatic self-assembly takes place during a vacuum filtration process. The benefit of using this material is that it can be applied directly as a self-supporting anode in LIBs with an excellent stability and impressive gravimetric capacity of 1390 mA h g–1 at 2 A g–1.

Figure 58

Figure 58. Capacity of the Si/rGO material at various current densities upon cycling. Reprinted with permission from ref 285. Copyright 2013 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Similar to Si, Ge holds promise as an anode material in LIBs due to its large theoretical capacity, although it suffers cycling drawbacks due to expansion upon Li insertion. A study by Yuan and Tuan (288) has shown that a carbon-coated Ge nanoparticles/rGO material can be applied as an anode material in LIBs with large capacitance retention close to the Ge theoretical capacitance value. The C/Ge/rGO material exhibited a discharge capacity of ∼1100 mA h g–1 at 0.2 C after 360 cycles with discharge rates ranging from 0.2 to 20 C. This material was additionally used to construct aluminum-pouch-type lithium-ion commercial type batteries, which offered a capacity of over 20 mA h; these batteries were then used to power an electric fan, a scrolling LED marquee, and LED arrays.
As the Si and Ge examples have demonstrated, the use of a carbon layer promotes recycling stability, and as such it would be expected that G can also act as a coating layer to improve recycling stability of materials in LIBs. In this vein, Shi and co-workers (238) have shown that hollow Li3VO4 microboxes coated with rGO can be applied as an anode material in LIBs. This material exhibits improved capacitance at larger discharge rates (223 versus 87 mA h g–1 at 20 C), as well as recycling stability (378 versus 345 mA h g–1 after 50 cycles at a current density of 20 mA g–1), as compared to uncoated Li3VO4 microboxes. In another study, Hu and colleagues (239) applied a Kirkendall process to fabricate a γ-Fe2O3/G/amorphous carbon (hollow core–first shell–second shell) material by air oxidation of a Fe core/G/amorphous carbon material. The authors showed that the hollow core and G layer shell are important factors in the stability of the material upon recycling (833 mA h g–1 at 1 C after 100 cycles) when compared to uncoated α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles as well as other reported α-Fe2O3/G and α-Fe2O3/carbon materials. (289, 290)
An alternative to LIBs are the sodium ion batteries (NIBs), which have a lower cost. However, these batteries are plagued with stability and performance issues, which are related to the limited choices of anode materials. (291) For this reason, Yu and colleagues (292) have proposed the use of Sb2S3 nanoparticles coating rGO as an anode material due to its large theoretical capacity of 946 mA h g–1 as well as stability upon recycling. As compared to commercially available Sb2S3, the Sb2S3/rGO material shows negligible capacitance loss upon cycling, that is, 97.2% capacitance retention versus 50% after 50 cycles. From these results, we can see the critical role G can play in the future of NIBs, which can operate with large charge densities at a lower price.
G/nanoparticle materials have also been applied in lithium–sulfur batteries, where Xiao and colleagues (293) have shown that the deposition of a TiO2/G layer on top of the porous CNT/S cathode leads to improved stability. While the TiO2/G layer does not contribute to the charge capacity, it does inhibit the dissolution of the S cathode, which results in very low capacity degradation rates upon cycling. For this reason, the battery made with the TiO2/G is able to supply a specific capacity of 1040 mA h g–1 over 300 cycles at 0.5 C, while the S cathode coated only with G supplied 750 mA h g–1 and the uncoated S cathode supplied 430 mA h g–1.
Lithium–oxygen and lithium–sulfur batteries have been proposed as alternatives to LIBs due to their large specific energy density; however, they suffer due to capacitance decrease on recycling. To improve the capacity fading that occurs in these proposed batteries, due to irreversible reactions, Ryu et al. (294) have developed a Co3O4 nanofiber/G material, which they applied as the O2 cathode in a Li–O2 battery. The Co3O4 nanofibers were produced by an electrospinning process and then deposited onto pristine G (noncovalently functionalized using 1-pyrenebutyric acid) or rGO using sonication. The pristine G material proved to be important for cycling stability of the material with a discharge capacity of 10 500 mA h g–1 after 80 cycles (see Figure 59). (294) This report shows that the use of G materials still holds much promise for batteries, with applicability in next generation energy devices.

Figure 59

Figure 59. Cycling performance of Co3O4 NPs (nanoparticles), Co3O4 NFs (nanofibers), Co3O4 NF/rGO composite, and Co3O4 NFs/GNF (graphene) materials under a specific capacity limit of 1000 mA h g–1 in a voltage window between 4.35 and 2.0 V at a current density of 200 mA g–1. Reprinted with permission from ref 294. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

4.7.4 Decoration of Graphene and Graphene Oxide with Magnetic Nanostructures

A recent review by us has highlighted the importance of magnetic G materials in wastewater treatments, medical research, catalysis, etc., and as such this section should be considered as an update to this literature. (279)
In an early study by Chandra et al., (295) superparamagnetic Fe3O4–rGO hybrids were synthesized via the hydrazine reduction of a Fe3O4–GO precursor. These hybrid materials were subsequently applied in the removal of As(III) and As(V) from contaminated water samples. As the material showed near complete (99.9%) arsenic removal and magnetic separation, these types of material should be applicable in water purification.
The simple autoclave pyrolytic fabrication of Fe3C (iron carbide) nanoparticles encapsulated by G has been reported by Hu et al. (296) An advantage of using G encapsulated nanoparticles is that they are separated from environments, which may decompose them. This was demonstrated for the Fe3C nanoparticles, which exhibited stability in acid solution that normally degrades it. This G Fe3C encapsulated material was subsequently applied as an ORR catalyst in basic media, with an onset potential (1.05 V versus RHE) and half wave potential (0.83 V) comparable to those of a commercially available Pt/C ORR catalyst. Importantly, this material shows negligible response to methanol introduction into the system as compared to the commercial Pt/C catalyst. In another study, Moussa et al. (297) have shown that the Fe-based nanoparticles (Fe15–rGO, Fe15K5–rGO, Fe15Mn5–rGO, and Fe15K5Mn5–rGO) deposited onto a rGO can be used in the highly stable and recyclable Fischer–Tropsch synthesis of liquid hydrocarbons from C2H4 gas. The advantage of using the G-based systems is that most of the systems tested tend to give minor formation of CH4 and CO2 with a large activity toward higher hydrocarbons C8+. Of the G-based catalysts tested, the Fe15–rGO exhibited the lowest CH4 production (1.5%), yet exhibited a large C2–C7 hydrocarbon ratio of 32.0%; in contrast, the Fe15K5–rGO sample exhibited a 2.6% formation of CH4 and the largest formation of C8+ hydrocarbons (86.7%). These G-based materials exhibited an improved performance as compared to similar CNT-based materials, and the authors believe this is due to the accessibility of the iron carbide Fe5C2 active phase on the G support during catalysis.
An interesting study by Xu and co-workers (298) has shown that a 3D conductive Fe3O4/rGO aerogel can be fabricated through an rGO self-assembly and simultaneous Fe3O4 nanoparticle deposition. Interestingly, the as-synthesized lightweight material could be manipulated using an external magnetic field, while still maintaining its inherent conductivity (see Figure 60). (298) As the material maintains its conductivity upon magnetic deformation, the degree of strain along the axial and radial directions can then be determined by measuring the change in conductivity. For these reasons, the authors believe that this material holds promise in self-sensing soft actuators, microsensors, microswitches, as well as oil absorption and recycling.

Figure 60

Figure 60. (a) Magnetic deformation of the magnetic Fe3O4/rGO aerogel, (b) IV curve and thermal conductivity stability of the aerogel, and (c) change in the electrical resistance of the aerogel as a function of the magnetic field-induced deformation. Reprinted with permission from ref 298. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.

Fe3O4/rGO composite materials as electromagnetic shielding/interference materials have been reported by multiple research groups. (299-301) The materials can be produced by either solution precipitation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles onto the rGO surface, (299) or the deposition of already formed Fe3O4 nanoparticles onto the rGO surface. (300) The mechanism of this interference is attributed to the radiation being reflected by the small G sheets compartments (which are kept separated by the Fe3O4 nanoparticles), and subsequently this radiation is then able to interact with the Fe3O4 nanoparticles, which dampens the radiation. As such, a composite material consisting of polystyrene/TrGO/Fe3O4 is able to shield electromagnetic radiation with an efficiency of more than 30 dB in the 9.8–12 GHz frequency range. (299) In contrast, when the polymer support was changed to polyvinyl chloride (PVC), an efficiency of only 13 dB in the 8–12 GHz range was observed. (300) It should be noted however that in the PVC example, the TrGO/Fe3O4 additive greatly decreased the flammability of the PVC as well as afforded the PVC more tensile strength (20.8% increase) and larger Young’s modulus (73.7% increase).
Kumar et al. (302) have shown that glass beads coated with a Fe3O4/rGO material can be used as simple multifunctional micro robots (microbot). The authors showed that by varying the external magnetic field between 40 and 110 mT, the average velocity of the microbot can be varied linearly from 1.8 × 10–4 to 1 × 10–3 m s–1. Interestingly, as these microbots’ velocity can also be varied using chemical reactions and electric fields, the authors believe that the velocity can be increased or decreased even further. Demonstrating the practical applications of this microbot, the authors showed how it can be used to deliver cargo (∼1000 times heavier and ∼13 times larger in size than the microbot) inside a confined environment using a magnetically directed “drop-off” and “pick-up” mechanism.
Jiang et al. have shown that a Fe2O3–rGO composite can be produced using a supercritical CO2 thermal reduction of a Fe(NO3)3·9H2O and GO dispersion. (303) The authors then showed that a vertically or horizontally aligned Fe2O3–rGO paper can be obtained by filtration of a composite dispersion under a controlled magnetic field. The as-formed papers were then applied in H2S gas sensing, with the vertically aligned paper showing more sensitivity than the horizontally aligned material. This report demonstrates that the structural orientation of the graphene sheets in any synthesized material plays a crucial role in maximizing efficiency.

4.7.5 Decoration of Graphene Nanostructures with Quantum Dots

The deposition of various quantum dots (QDs) onto G proceeds (in most cases) via a facile solvothermal process, and the application of these QD–G materials varying from photocatalysis, supercapacitance, LIBs and NIBs, photodetectors, photosensitizers, water purification, etc., has been demonstrated by multiple research groups. (304-311) It should be noted here that similar applications are being realized for materials containing GQDs (graphene quantum dots). (312-317) Other methods toward QD–G materials have been developed by Zhang and colleagues (316) who fabricated a UV photodetector by the atomic layer deposition of ZnO QDs onto G. The authors note that the ZnO nucleates at defect sites in the G, which leads to the formation of QDs instead of thin film layers as is normally found with atomic layer deposition methods.
Perhaps one of the more novel methods that could be employed to deposit QDs onto a G surface was hinted at in a study by Zeng and colleagues (308) who showed that the carcinoembryonic antigen could be detected using a novel CdS QD–GO photoelectochemical biosensor. The mechanism of detection relies on the horseradish peroxidase, which catalyzes the reduction of sodium thiosulfate with H2O2 to give H2S, and this reacts with Cd2+ present in solution to form CdS QDs. As such, this study shows that enzymes could potentially be used in the deposition of QDs with a controllable size on a G substrate.
QD–G materials have been widely applied in the photoelectrochemical and dye-sensitized solar cell fields, with this largely being due to the transparency and conductivity of G materials, which make it a viable replacement for traditionally applied electrode materials. (304, 305, 318) In these studies, the G component of the solar cell is crucial in the separation of charge carriers and as such preventing recombination, which leads to an improved efficiency. Jung and Chu (319) have shown that the binding mechanism between the quantum dot and graphene is critical toward improved charge transfer efficiency between the components. In this study, the authors deposited capped CdSe QDs onto an rGO substrate using either covalent (aryl bond) or noncovalent (π–π interactions) attachment. Thin films of these materials were fabricated electrophoretically, and it was shown that the covalently attached CdSe QDs lead to an improved quantum efficiency as well as photocurrent density. It should be noted, however, that noncovalent attachment is beneficial toward an enhanced phototransfer processes between the CdSe QD and the G surface, as has been demonstrated by Guo and colleagues. (320) Interestingly, Hirose and co-workers (321) have shown that QD blinking can be suppressed in a CdTe QD–G system by spin coating a layer of polyvinylpyrrolidone or polyethylene glycol over the composite material. Photoluminescence blinking can lead to a decrease in efficiency, as it is essentially the random switching between ON and OFF states; as such this spin coating method holds promise toward the development of improved solar cell systems incorporating QD–G systems. Liu and colleagues (322) have demonstrated using fluorescence emission analysis that multiphoton emission in CdTe/ZnS QDs can be greatly enhanced when the QDs are deposited onto single layer CVD G. This enhanced multiphoton emission is believed to be due to a decrease in fluorescence lifetime, and hence fluorescence intensity, which results in a lower single-photon emission probability due to the presence of the G, which acts as a quencher.
The use of QD/G materials in energy materials that do not take advantage of the photocatalytic properties of the QDs has also generated interest. TiO–QD–rGO, Ge–QD–N-doped rGO, Co3O4–QD–rGO, and ZnO–QD–rGO are among the many materials that have been employed in LIBs. (310, 323-325) One of the major reasons to employ QDs in LIBs is that with a decrease in nanoparticle size, the volume expansion associated with lithium insertion and extraction is minimized, and as such the batteries are more stable than counterparts consisting of larger particles. In the synthesis of the Co3O4–QD–rGO material, Zhou et al. (325) showed that a microwave synthetic method can dramatically decrease the reaction time normally required for solvothermal synthetic methods.
Carbon-coated Fe3O4 QDs deposited on rGO have the additional structural stabilization benefit, besides size reduction, of avoiding detachment of the Fe3O4 QDs through an enhanced strong adhesive force between QD and G. (326) As such, a synthesized Fe3O4@C–rGO material exhibited a specific capacity of 940 mA h g–1 at a current density of 150 mA g–1, which is similar to results obtained for Fe3O4–G coated nanoparticles cross-linked into 3D G foams. (327) Xia and colleagues (310) have shown that an Fe2O3–QD–rGO material can be applied as an anode material in an asymmetric supercapacitor, with the cathode material being fabricated from a MnO2 nanoparticle/rGO material. The Fe2O3–QD–rGO anode material exhibited a maximum specific capacitance of 347 F g–1 when cycled between −1 and 0 V versus an Ag/AgCl reference electrode in a 1 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution. Additionally, the authors showed that the fabricated asymmetric supercapacitor can deliver an energy density of 50.7 Wh kg–1 at a power density of 100 W kg–1, with this supercapacitor exhibiting 95% retention of its initial capacitance after 5000 cycles.
A novel method for the deposition of PbS QDs onto GO has been presented by Tayyebi and co-workers (328) who used supercritical ethanol, which acted as a solvent, reducing agent, and surfactant in the reaction. Interestingly, the authors showed that the PbS QDs bind to the G surface through residual oxygen functionalities on the TrGO surface through Pb–O–C bonds; this in turn results in a reduced band gap, which one would expect to translate into an increased recombination rate. This counterintuitive phenomenon is believed to be due to the electron transfer from the conduction band of the PbS QDs into the TrGO, thereby leading to a decrease in charge recombination.
TiO2 QDs deposited onto exfoliated G have been shown to be an effective precursor toward the formation of ultrathin TiO2 films deposited onto glass substrates. (329) These G-containing TiO2 QD materials exhibit improved photocatalytic efficiency when compared to G-containing TiO2 nanoparticle materials, as well as G free TiO2 QD. This is attributed to the larger contact area that occurs between the QD and the G surface as compared to the nanoparticle and G surface. In another study by Cao and colleagues, (330) it has been demonstrated that MnOx QDs can be deposited onto a rGO substrate uniformly coated with TiO2 nanoparticles using a UV and microwave synthesis method. The material synthesized in this method displays an enhanced dye degradation photocatalytic activity, as well as electrochemical and photochemical energy storage. Interestingly, this material can photochemically store energy, which can be utilized in antimicrobial activity in the dark with efficiency similar to penicillin, although UV irradiation leads to a far greater inhibition effect.

5 Applications of Noncovalently Functionalized Graphene and Graphene Oxide

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Noncovalent functionalization through electrostatic, π-effects, van der Waals forces, and hydrophobic effects, etc., is an effective method for changing the physicochemical properties of nanofillers to improve their interfacial interactions in a material matrix. (331) Noncovalent functionalized nanomaterials containing G/GO exist in two forms: (i) nanospecies deposited onto the G surface and (ii) nanospecies encapsulated with G/GO. These materials have been applied in various advanced applications in the fields of energy materials, green chemistry, environmental science, nanodevices, catalysis, photocatalytic, biosensors, bioimaging, and biomedicine. In these subsections, we will give an overview of selected recent advanced applications wherein variously functionalized G/GO nanomaterials have been applied.

5.1 Energy Materials

Monolayer or few-layer G/GO structures are extremely efficient materials for adsorption of or encapsulation of nanoparticles. In fact, these nanoparticles exhibit a beneficial impact on G or GO-based electrochemical energy conversion and storage devices. (332-336) Campbell et al. (337) have evaluated the battery/supercapacitor performance of large surface area G modified with anthraquinone (AQ), where the AQ and G are bonded through π–π interactions. They reported that the gravimetric energy storage capacity of G macro-assemblies (GMAs) can be increased nearly 3 times (∼23 Wh kg–1) by AQ. They also demonstrated that the AQ provides a battery-like redox charge storage capacity (927 C g–1), while the inherent conductivity and capacitance of the GMAs are maintained. Kong et al. (338) have developed a MoS2@G nanocable web composite, which was applied as an advanced high performance electrode materials for LIBs. The binder-free MoS2@G hybrid electrode not only showed a large specific capacity (∼1150 mA h g–1) and remarkable recycling performance (∼100% stability after 160 cycles at 0.5 A g–1), but also exhibited a high-rate capability of 700 mA h g–1 at the sweep rate of 10 A g–1. It is believed that the improvement in the performance of the hybrid is due to the highly dispersed MoS2 sheets, which accelerate the Li-ion transport, and shorten the Li+ ion diffusion paths. The authors believe that this 2D/2D hybrid nanoarchitecture leads to more active sites for Li+ insertion/extraction and as such could be applied as an electrode material in high performance batteries. TiO2 materials are desired as anode materials in LIBs due to safety factors, low price, environmental benignity, and excellent cycle durability. Conversely, TiO2 materials have a poor theoretical capacity and conductivity. To combat this, Yang et al. (339) employed a sandwich-like porous TiO2/rGO hybrid (T-150, T-200, and T-240) as an anode electrode material for LIBs. These hybrid materials with porous structures and high electrical conductivity exhibited good stability (no decrease in capacity of 206 mA h g–1 at a current density of 0.1 A g–1 after 200 charge–discharge cycles) and a remarkably large reversible capacity of ∼128 mA h g–1 at a current rate of 5 A g–1 (see Figure 61). (339) The efficiency of these hybrids is attributed to (i) the porous TiO2 nanocrystals whose small sizes reduced the diffusion length for Li insertion–extraction, as well as (ii) affording good contact with the electrolyte and the RGO sheets, which enhanced the conductivity of the hybrid.

Figure 61

Figure 61. (a) Charge–discharge voltage profiles of the T-200 hybrid cycled at 1.0–3.0 V at a current density of 0.1 A g–1, (b) rate performances of T-200, C1, and C2 at various current densities, and (c) cycling performance of T-150, T-200, T-240, C1, and C2 at a current density of 0.1 A g–1. Reprinted with permission from ref 339. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Ali et al. (340) have developed an iron fluoride hydrate/rGO material as a promising cathode material for NIBs. These materials displayed an impressive discharge capacity of 266 mA h g–1 under a current density of 0.05 C, and a stable cycle performance (∼86% retain after 100 cycles). These properties suggest its applicability as a cathode material for NIBs. It should be noted that due to polarization effects and the large size of the Na+ ion, the rate capability of this iron fluoride hydrate/rGO material was lackluster. As such, further developments in the preparation methods of G or GO nanostructures and nanomaterials are required for G materials to be applicable in NIBs. MoS2/rGO flake hybrids have been recently identified as a promising material for electrodes in NIBs. (341) The hybrids were synthesized in the form of layered free-standing papers, which were found to show a good cycling ability with stable charge capacity of 230 mA h g–1. Moreover, these composite papers possessed a high average strain, thus considering them as ideal cantidates for exploitation in the field of large-area free-standing binder-free flexible electrodes for rechargeable applications. Qu and co-workers (342) have shown that rGO can be assembled into 3D porous networks using a dual substrate-assisted reduction and assembly (DSARA) method, which the authors believe can be applied in energy-related applications such as LIBs, fuel cells, photoelectric conversion devices, etc. In this study, the authors showed that a 3D DSARA-produced rGO porous network coated with NiO/Ni complexes exhibits a remarkable capacity (1524 mA h g–1) with a stable high charge–discharge rate (600 mA h g–1 after 1000 cycles). Additionally, a PdPt alloy deposited onto the 3D DSARA-produced rGO porous network displayed efficient catalytic performance for the ORR in fuel cells. (342) The formation of these 3D G structures can increase the specific capacity of a material through the introduction of porous channels, which facilitate ion transportation, and as such optimized 3D G nanostructures are critically important not only in ORR, but supercapacitor applications. (343) In this sense, Jung et al. (344) have reported that controlled porous aerogel structures can be formed from suspensions of electrochemically exfoliated G, and that this material can be applied as a supercapacitor electrode. Because of the 3D G aerogels’ large specific surface area, low density, and superior electrical conductivity, it showed a large specific capacitance (325 F g–1 at 1 A g–1) and good energy density (45 Wh kg–1 in acid electrolyte) with high electrochemical durability. Jana and co-workers (345) have shown that GO can be noncovalently modified using sulfanilic acid azocromotrop (SAC), which is then reduced in a subsequent step using hydrazine monohydrate to give SAC–rGO (see Figure 62). This synthesized material was then applied as a supercapactitor electrode material, which showed a large capacitance (366 F g–1 at 1.2 A g–1), high energy density (25.86 W h kg–1), and excellent power density (980 W kg–1) with good cycling stability (∼72% retain after 5000 charge–discharge cycles). These impressive electrochemical properties are attributed to the redox reactions between the SAC–rGO materials’ SO3H/OH functionalities and the H+ ions of H2SO4. (345)

Figure 62

Figure 62. Synthetic methods used to produce SAC–rGO (right bottom) and rGO (left bottom). A schematic of the electrochemical device used to measure the supercapacitance of the material is also shown. Reprinted with permission from ref 345. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry.

5.2 Solar Cells

Solar energy is considered a possible alternative to the traditional fossil fuel energy sources due to the fact that the sun is essentially a free and continuous energy supply. Additionally, the cost of solar cells can be dramatically reduced when the efficiency of solar cells is increased; for example, a solar module that exhibited a 1% enhancement in its efficiency led to a 5% reduction in price. (346) G/GO exhibits potential as an optically conductive window as they allow a wide range of light wavelengths to pass through, that is, optical transmittance reaching ∼98%. (346, 347) Additionally, G/GO optical and electrical properties can be modulated through noncovalent interactions with metal complexes, which make it suitable for different types of solar cell applications. (346-350) Wang et al.’s (351) group have developed a solution-based low-temperature deposition procedure to manufacture the electron collection layer using a G/TiO2 nanoparticle material as the electron collection layers in meso-superstructured perovskite solar cells. They found that the solar cells manufactured using this low-temperature process exhibit a significant photovoltaic performance, that is, power conversion efficiency up to 15.6%, which suggests that solar cells no longer need a high-temperature sintering process when TiO2 is employed in the electron collection layer (see Figure 63). This enhancement in efficiency was ascribed to the synergetic effects between G and TiO2 nanoparticles, where (i) G might reduce the formation of energy barriers at the interface between TiO2 and fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) and (ii) the superior charge mobility of G may provide improved electrical conductivity in the electron collection layer. (351) Kim and colleagues (352) have studied the optoelectronic properties of G thin films (thickness between 2–30 nm) prepared using a Langmuir–Blodgett (LB) assembly method. In this method, the G thin films are assembled by dip coating a glass substrate in a N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) and water G dispersion. The authors found that the conductivity of the as-formed films can be tuned by increasing the lateral size and the density of the packing of the G platelets in the LB assembly. Fukuzumi et al. (353) reported a rapid photoinduced charge separation in ordered self-assembled layers of perylenediimide and GO (PDI–GO), where this self-assembly is believed to proceed via π–π and electrostatic interactions between the components in water. The authors believe that the π–π stacking between the components is necessary for efficient charge separation as it promotes a “pull effect”. This in turn leads to slow charge recombination due to holes being able to move easily on the G surface. In contrast, when this hybrid stack material is introduced into a polymer environment, the interlayer charge-hopping mechanism is interrupted due to loss of the self-assembly macrostructure, and this causes rapid back electron transfer from PDI•– to oxidized GO, that is, faster recombination. (353) In another study, Dehsari and co-workers (354) developed a polymer solar cell (PSC) hole transport layer (HTL) by spin coating a thin layer of ultra large GO/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS/GO) material onto an indium–tin–oxide (ITO) anode. They showed that the optimized PSC with a PEDOT:PSS/GO HTL layer exhibits a power conversion efficiency of 3.39%, an enhancement of ∼12%, with respect to a PSC, which contains only a PEDOT:PSS layer. The improved power conversion efficiency is attributed to improved hole mobility and reduced radiative exciton quenching at the interface of the PEDOT:PSS/GO HTLs and the poly(2-methoxy-5(2-ethyl)hexoxy-phenylenevinylene) active layer. (354) Kymakis and co-workers (355) fabricated flexible organic photovoltaic devices (OPD) with in situ nonthermal photoreduction of spin-deposited GO electrodes. The GO films were reduced by the laser system and then were utilized as transparent electrodes in flexible, bulk heterojunction, OPDs, which open the possibility of replacing the traditional ITO substrate. The GO-based OPDs showed a power-conversion efficiency of 1.1% with 70% transparency. (355) Many reports on the good optical transmittance and excellent electrical conductivity of G layers have been published, (346-355) but studies are limited on the transparent conducting property by coating the G layers onto fabricated solar cells. Additionally, difficulties arise in the transfer of a uniform G/GO layer onto highly textured surfaces, and this may limit its possible large-scale production.

Figure 63

Figure 63. G–TiO2 hybrid-based solar cell performance under simulated AM 1.5, 106.5 mW/cm2 solar irradiation (red line), and that in the dark (black line). Reprinted with permission from ref 351. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are attractive as they are environmentally friendly, economical, and exhibit high energy conversion efficiency. (356, 357) In DSSCs, the electrons are injected from photo-oxidized dyes into TiO2 nanoparticles, and the resulting oxidized dyes are regenerated by electrolytes. At a counter electrode (CE), I ions reduce the oxidized dyes, yielding I3, and the resulting I3 ions are finally reduced to I. Thus, the CE plays an important role in enhancing DSSC performance by catalyzing reduction of the electrolyte. The electron transport in disordered TiO2 nanoparticles with a random transit path increased the charge recombination, thereby reducing the photocurrent and the efficiency of the DSSCs. Fabrication of photoanodes with a fast transport pathway is still a challenge for DSSCs. In this sense, Cheng et al. (358) prepared hybrid materials of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles on rGO sheets (TiO2@rGO) for application in DSSCs. These hybrid photoanode materials exhibited a better efficiency (7.68%) in DSSCs than that of the pure TiO2 (4.78%), suggesting that the introduction of G accelerates the electron transfer and decreases the charge recombination. Bi and co-workers (359) developed a quasi core–shell structure of N-doped G/cobalt sulfide (NDG/CoS) as a CE for DSSCs, which exhibited a high short-circuit current density (20.38 mA cm–2) and an energy conversion efficiency of 10.71% (see Figure 64). The remarkable performance of these DSSCs is attributed to the core of CoS nanoparticles coated with a shell of ultrathin NDG layers that act as conductive paths to overcome the problem of low conductivity caused by grain boundaries and defects between the CoS nanoparticles.
Much effort is still required to either replace Pt in DSSCs with less expensive alternative materials or to develop easier low-temperature approaches, which employ reduced amounts of Pt; in this vein, easy, cheap, and room-temperature processes are of vital interest for DSSC commercialization. Additionally, the DSSC energy conversion efficiency with various types of hybrid materials is still lower than ∼11%, which is much smaller than commercial solar cells. Thus, further developments are required to obtain a much larger DSSC efficiency to be compatible with the recent developments of perovskite solar cells, (360, 361) which shows ∼20% efficiency, although these perovskite-based devices are not yet stable enough for practical applications.

Figure 64

Figure 64. DSSCs performance with NDG/CoS, G/CoS, NDG, and Pt as CEs. Reprinted with permission from ref 359. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Noncovalent functionalization at the interface of G/GO by doping, chemical/physical modification, and nanoparticle coating could be one of the best approaches to greatly tune the nanostructure and chemophysical properties toward the development of high performance electrode materials in energy storage applications. Although several reports on noncovalent functionalization of G/GO with different morphologies as energy materials have been published, there is still a long way to go before its wide use in industrial applications.

5.3 Water Splitting

The production of hydrogen from H2O would generate a new era of cheap, clean, and renewable energy such as hydrogen fuel cells and liquid fuels synthesized from syngas and CO2. The electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) from water is a process that has attracted much attention due to its high energy conversion efficiency. More recently, molybdenum (Mo)-based materials as electrocatalysts have been shown as the most effective HER, while their commercialization is obstructed by durability. Recently, MoS2, (362) MoSe2, (363) Mo2C, (364) MoB, (365) MoS2 analogues, (366) NiMoNx, (367) Co0.6Mo1.4N2, (368) Mo2N, (369) and MoO2 (370) have been employed as electrocatalysts for the HER in acidic/basic electrolytes; however, the durability of Mo-based catalysts is still not satisfactory in the presence of acidic or base electrolytes under the long-term or accelerated test. Chang et al. (371) employed the thermolysis of ammonium thiomolybdates in a CVD chamber to grow MoSx on G-coated 3D Ni foams at various temperatures. Subsequently, the MoSx/G/3D Ni foam electrode was used for electrocatalytic HER. According to their results, the G sheets on Ni foam gave the Ni protection against etching and increased the stability of working electrode in strong acid media. Additionally, these electrodes showed a large hydrogen production of ∼302 mL g–1 cm–2 h–1 (13.47 mmol g–1 cm–2 h–1) at an overpotential of V = 0.2 V and an improved current density of ∼45 mA cm–2 at 0.2 V, due to the presence of bridging S22– or apical S2– in amorphous states. (371) Among the various types of Mo-based electrocatalysts, Mo2C/G materials display remarkable HER activities and stability, including small overpotentials, large cathodic current densities, and high exchange current density under acidic and basic conditions. These properties are believed to be due to their unique d-band electronic structures (electronic structure like a noble metal). (372) Pan et al. (373) developed Mo2C nanoparticles on GO sheets, and they found that the Mo2C nanoparticles were stabilized by a carbon layer. The Mo2C–rGO hybrid showed an overpotential voltage of ∼70 mV, and the cathodic current increased rapidly under more negative potentials. Notably, Mo2C–rGO exhibited a large HER performance (mass activity ∼77 mA mg–1 at 150 mV), a low Tafel slope (57.3 mV decade–1), and good stability (stable after 1000 cycles (see Figure 65)). (373) The improved activity and stability were ascribed to the large surface area of the G support and the improved conductivity of the Mo2C–RGO hybrid.

Figure 65

Figure 65. (a) HER polarization curves for catalysts, (b) Tafel plots, (c) stability test of Mo2C–rGO hybrid, and (d) time dependence of current density of Mo2C–rGO hybrid at an applied potential of 140 mV. Reprinted with permission from ref 373. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

In a separate work, Xu et al. (370) employed the MoO2/rGO hybrid as a highly efficient HER. They reported that the presence of oxygen-containing groups limits the growth of MoO2 nanoparticles to a tiny size due to the space confinement effect between GO layers. The MoO2/rGO hybrid display good HER activity with a low onset overpotential of 190 mV, a high cathodic current density, and a low Tafel slope (49 mV decade–1) due to a synergistic effect between metallic MoO2 nanoparticles and G with electronic communication promoted by an interface interaction. More recently, Zhang and co-workers (374) reported an amorphous MoSxCly as a high-performance electrocatalyst for electrochemical hydrogen productions. These electrocatalysts showed large cathodic current densities and small Tafel slopes (50 mV decade–1), which are attributed to the synergistic effects of a remarkable intrinsic activity of the MoSxCly catalyst and a large active surface area. The recent work by Zhou et al. (375) on HER activity using N-doped carbon-wrapped Co nanoparticles with a size of ∼15 nm supported on N-doped G nanosheets (Co@NC/NG) is very interesting. The Co@NC/NG electrode exhibited a small overpotential (−49 mV) and small Tafel slope (79.3 mV decade–1) due to carbon atoms promoted by the entrapped cobalt nanoparticles. It was found that the strong synergetic interaction between the G/GO and nanoparticles enhanced the charge separation and affected the band structure of G/GO. However, the properties of G/GO nanoparticle hybrids are usually ignored when G/GO is used as the electron acceptor and transporter. Furthermore, the defects in G/GO nanoparticles hybrids are essential for their electronic properties, and play a key role in improvement of the HER stability and activity of the supported catalysts. Accordingly, the structure defects of G/GO in G/GO–nanoparticle hybrids should be further researched, because they might be the active sites for hydrogen production. Moreover, the development of nonprecious catalysts with activities better than commercial Pt/C is still a big challenge for researchers who want to apply this technology in large-scale applications.

5.4 Green Chemistry and Environments

Noncovalently functionalized G/GO materials hold promise in the development of sustainable catalysts for green chemistry with low emissions and high selectivity. Therefore, the use of these materials in the growing field of “catalysis and environmental green chemistry” has become important due to their unique chemical properties, high mechanical resistance, and their favorable charge generation and transportation in catalysis and environmental processes. The G, GO, and its reduced oxide are necessary to disperse the materials in water for their application in the field of catalytic reaction and environmental pollution. (376) Achari et al. (377) developed highly aqueous dispersible aminoclay–rGO (AC–rGO) hybrids by the in situ condensation of aminoclay over GO followed by hydrazine reduction (see Figure 66). They found that these amphiphilic hybrid materials with high concentrations of 7.5 mg rGO/mL are stable in water solution and display simultaneous adsorption of Cyt-C via hydrophobic interaction and DNA via electrostatic interaction. In a separate study, McCoy and co-workers (378) employed noncovalent magnetic control to reversibly recover GO using iron oxide (Fe2O3) in the presence of magnetic surfactants. Because the GO is unchanged, there is no loss of its original properties; thus, the GO and magnetic material can be reused (see Figure 67a). Because of large differences in the isoelectric point of GO (pH ≈ 0) and Fe2O3 (pH ≈ 7), a wide gap is present in which the two materials show opposite surface charges (see Figure 67b), and thus the separation could be attributed to Coulombic attraction. The recyclable nature of this assembly and the large adsorption capacity of GO indicate the materials’ potential use in applications for decontamination and water treatment. (379) Zubir and co-workers (380) achieved efficient Acid Orange 7 (AO7) degradation using a GO–Fe3O4 hybrid. These enhancements were attributed to the synergistic effects between both optimized GO amount and Fe3O4 nanoparticles. This can be explained by several factors: First, the large surface area of exfoliated GO provides a uniform dispersion of Fe3O4 nanoparticles onto the surface of GO sheets, which is good for increasing the mass transfer of reactants toward the active (≡Fe2+/≡Fe3+) sites during the decontamination. (380) Second, GO has a large aromatic ring structure on its basal plane that supports AO7 adsorption via π–π interactions, which allows enhanced AO7 concentration within the active sites to be oxidized faster by the generated hydroxyl radicals (OH). (380) Third, the strong interaction between Fe3O4 NPs and GO through Fe–O–C bonds accelerates the electron transfer between the nanoparticles and GO sheets. (380) Finally, the synergistic effect between GO and Fe3O4 nanoparticles promotes the regeneration of ferrous irons to quicken the redox cycle on active sites, consequently enhancing the AO7 degradation and mineralization. (380) Liu et al. (381) synthesized halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) loaded on rGO sheets (abbreviated as HGC) via an electrostatic self-assembly process for removal of dyes from water. The electrostatic force occurred between the negative rGO sheets (van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding) and HNTs positively charged by γ-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES) functionalization. The rhodamine B (RhB) adsorption on HGC was ∼45.4 mg mg–1 after seven cycles due to the big pore volumes, large surface area, the strong π–π stacking interactions, and its abundant functional groups on the surface. Le and co-workers (379) also developed a 3D microhydrogel of nanoparticle/G platelets by reversible self-assembly and aqueous exfoliation. These 3D hydrogels showed excellent methylene blue dye removal (adsorption capacity = 685 mg g–1) and photocatalytic dye degradation due to the presence of large surface area (1677 m2 g–1), low band gap (1.8 eV), and good charge separation and rapid electron transfer. (379) Dong et al. (382) developed bioinspired surface functionalization of GO for dye and heavy metal ion adsorption. The poly dopamine (PD) functionalized GO (PD/GO) had superior Eschenmoser-containing dyes’ adsorption capacity up to 2.1 g g–1. (382) Additionally, PD/GO also showed good adsorption capacity for heavy metal ions (53.6 mg g–1 for Pb2+, 24.4 mg g–1 for Cu2+, 33.3 mg g–1 for Cd2+, and 15.2 mg g–1 for Hg2+), suggesting it is a promising adsorbent for decontaminating wastewater. (382) Mondal and co-workers (383) developed a bifunctionalized G and expanded graphite using n-butyl lithium, and this material was then applied in efficient dye adsorption from dye contaminated water by noncovalent interaction between the dye and the COOH groups of the graphenic plane. In a recent report, Liang and co-workers (384) developed a facile and efficient electrostatic self-assembly strategy for improving the interfacial contact between rGO and MIL-53(Fe) (termed as M53–rGO). The M53–rGO hybrid displayed excellent photocatalytic activity (reduction of Cr(VI) rapidly increased to 100% under visible light illumination), which is attributed to a decrease in the recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs. It is believed that the good interfacial contact between MIL-53(Fe) and rGO facilitates the transfer of photogenerated electrons. These results open potential applications for the M53–rGO hybrid in industrial wastewater treatment.

Figure 66

Figure 66. Synthesis of AC–GO and AC–rGO hybrids. The blue platelets represent aminoclay, while the brown and gray sheets show GO and rGO, respectively. Reprinted with permission from ref 377. Copyright 2013 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 67

Figure 67. (a) Schematic diagram of the basic concept of the experiment: proper pH is used to affect charge attraction/repulsion between the GO sheets and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Fe2O3 nanoparticles separated from solution or dispersion by applied magnetic field. (b) Zeta potentials of GO and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Reprinted with permission from ref 378. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.

G sheets have many advantages such as availability, solubility, high quality, environmentally friendly nature, and inexpensive, large-scale production; these benefits open an opportunity for exploring novel adsorption and degradation by synthesizing noncovalently functionalized G/GO hybrids. The existence of G/GO in the hybrid provides superior applications in different kinds of dyes adsorption/degradation from water due to the presence of large surface area, pore volume, and good active sites for chemical reactions.

5.5 Nano-Devices

Self-assembly and grafting of G/GO onto carbon fibers have been found to enhance the interfacial bonding with a shape memory polymer (SMP) matrix via van der Waals forces and covalent cross-link. (385) This effective approach remarkably improved the electrical properties and recovery performance of SMPs that are used for Joule heating triggered shape recovery at a lower electrical voltage. (386, 387) The electrical conductivity was further upgraded when nanoparticles were introduced into SMP composites because they reduce the gap between G/GO. With these scenarios in mind, it is evident that G/GO holds great promise for application in nanodevices. Basically, two mechanisms are involved in self-assembly of stable monolayers of alkane chain molecules on graphene: (388) (i) bonds between the G/GO and the molecular “anchor” group (many reports have been given on interactions of ammonia molecules with the surface of G/GO by monitoring charge transport in G field-effect devices as a function of gas exposure), (1, 389-392) and (ii) interchain interactions, for instance, van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding. (393) Recently, Wang and co-workers (394) synthesized a polymer-functionalized rGO from a noncovalent functionalized pyrene-terminal polymer in benzoyl alcohol. They reported that these sheets exhibit organo-dispersibility, high grafting density, high electrical conductivity (see Figure 68), and good processability. Georgakilas et al. (170) prepared hydrophilic functionalized MWNTs and stabilized a large amount of pristine G sheets in water without the use of surfactants, ionic liquids, and hydrophilic polymers. The multidimensional (2D/1D) G/MWNTs composite exhibited a stable water dispersion at concentrations up to 15 mg mL–1 and also was dispersible in other polar solvents. (170) Interestingly, these composites exhibited excellent conductivity (sheet resistance up to Rs ≈ 25 Ω □–1 for free hybrid material and Rs ≈ 1300 Ω □–1 for a polyvinilalcohol/hybrid composite film) after coating on paper by drop casting a dispersion of the water-soluble polymers. (170)

Figure 68

Figure 68. Conductivity of various hybrid materials of G/rGO. Reprinted with permission from ref 394. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry.

In a separate study, Song et al. (94) developed epoxy–G hybrids with good thermal conductivity by using nonoxidized G flakes (GFs) through noncovalent functionalization. The noncovalently functionalized GFs, with 1-pyrenebutyric acid, stimulate dispersion of GFs in organic or aqueous solvents with high solubility and stability. The interfacial bonding between GFs and the polymer matrix was found to be responsible for the superior thermal conductivity enhancement. (94) Kozhemyakina and co-workers (395) achieved electronic communication between G and perylene bisimide via titration experiments, when both materials are either coated on a surface or dispersed in a homogeneous solution. This interaction is facilitated by the noncovalent binding of their conjugated π-systems. (395) The electronic properties of G can be tuned by modification with organic molecules; for example, dye molecules containing a conjugated π-system can be utilized to change the electronic structure of G. In this vein, Parvez and co-workers (396) have fabricated organic field-effect transistors on G sheets. The highly conductive (sheet resistance ∼4.8 kΩ □–1) G sheets were achieved in high quality and high yield (>80%) by electrochemical exfoliation of graphite. They also reported that the G had a large sheet size, low oxygen content, and/or high C/O ratio as well as good electronic properties. (396) Noncovalent functionalization of G by van der Waals forces provides another method for fabrication of electronic devices as it does not induce severe changes into G. For example, Woszczyna et al. (397) and Nottbohm et al. (398) developed a simple approach to such functionalization by using mechanical stacking of an amino-terminated carbon nanomembrane (NH2-CNM) and single-layer G (SLG) sheets. The electric transport performances of these bare G and heterostructure (H) electric field devices are displayed in Figure 69. Raman mapping of D, G, and 2D peaks (see Figure 69b) exhibits the materials’ excellent structural quality and homogeneity on a large scale, which is further confirmed by electric transport measurements (see Figure 69c–g). They found that the intrinsic electronic quality of pristine SLG sheets is preserved in the heterostructures, thereby opening many possibilities for the use of G-based electronic in nanodevices. Halik et al. (399) reported a simple approach to fabricate oxo-functionalized graphene/polymer composite for low-voltage operating memory devices.These devices can be operated at 3 V. They also found that the thin film coating (∼5 nm) is mandatory to make the memory device function at low voltage. Additionally, a self-assembled monolayer of an imidazolium derivative further improves the function of the memory device.
Various types of molecules have been connected to G/GO through π–π stacking, and interfacial interactions between molecules and epoxy groups have been increased; this, in turn, has led to improvements in electrical and thermal conductivity. (1, 94, 170, 385-395) However, this approach requires a further investigation and progress because of some serious limitations in industrial level application such as the high costs of organic/inorganic derivatives and time-consuming, tedious synthesis.

Figure 69

Figure 69. Electric transport calibrations of G and heterostructure (H) electric field devices. (a) Optical microscope image of the H-device. (b) Raman mapping of 2D, G, and D peaks. (c) G resistivity at various position contacts (P1–P4) versus back-gate voltage (UBG) at room temperature.(d) Electric charge mobility of G in H- and G-devices versus carrier concentration (n) at room temperature.(e) The electric charge mobility in H- and G-devices at n = −2 × 1012 cm–2. (f) Conductivity of G in H3 and G1 in the vicinity of their charge neutrality points at room temperature. (g) Electrons and holes coexistence represented by Hall coefficient calibrations for devices H3 and G1 at a magnetic field of 1 T and a temperature of 250 mK. Dashed lines showed the single-particle model for holes and electrons. Reprinted with permission from ref 397. Copyright 2014 Wiley-VCH.

5.6 Catalysis and Photocatalysis

Noncovalent functionalization of G/GO with nanoparticles may lead to light harvesting and charge transfer features. In these materials, the lattice structure of G/GO remains intact and exhibits most of its intrinsic electronic properties. Thus, the hybrid materials of G/GO with nanoparticles bear great potential for catalysis and large-scale energy storage conversion applications, particularly when photo- and redox active chromophores, such as porphyrins or phthalocyanines, are involved in the graphite exfoliation and G stabilization. Recent studies on zinc(II) alkylsulfonylphthalocyanine–pyrene conjugate (ZPC) with highly exfoliated graphite and their photophysical properties reported by Roth et al. (400) are intriguing. In their report, the authors showed that ZPC stabilizes single layer G during the ultrasonication of graphite by virtue of strong electronic interactions of the hybrid in both the ground and the excited states. The presence of the pyrene functional group in the conjugate is crucial in respect of noncovalently immobilizing the electron accepting phthalocyanines onto the basal plane of graphite. (400) Wang et al. (401) developed a 3D mesoporous Fe3O4@Cu2O–GO framework as an efficient and recyclable catalyst for the synthesis of quinoxalines by using different substituents, that is, electron-rich and electron-withdrawing groups o-phenylenediamine and terminal alkyne, respectively. This 3D mesoporous framework exhibited good catalytic activity, selectivity (>99%), and recyclability after nine cycles, and this is believed to be due to its large surface area, large pore volume, unique structure, impressive mass transport, and application of an external magnetic field. (401) Further catalytic activity can be enhanced by increasing the active surface area of hybrid catalysts, that is, reducing the nanoparticle size (<2 nm). However, reducing the size of particles to less than 2 nm is limited by the conventional methods that utilize templates such as surfactants or dendrimers, which unfortunately can form barriers that confine the catalytic activity. Ren and co-workers (402) created a new catalyst containing 1–2 nm Au nanoparticles (NPs) anchored to thiophenol functionalized G sheets (Au/TGS). The Au/TGS catalysts exhibited better catalytic activity for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol because of the synergistic effects between the TGS and Au NPs and the high utilization of the metal catalyst. Besides catalytic reactions, many efforts have been made to enhance the photocatalytic activity of G/GO and nanoparticle hybrid materials. (403-406) Joseph and co-workers (407) fabricated a π–π stacked anchored by squaraine dye (VJ-S) sensitized r-NGOT (hybridized r-NGO and TiO2 in a self-assembled core/shell structure (VJ-S/r-NGOT)) material and evaluated its photocatalytic activity and H2 evolution performance. The direct charge transfer and π–π interaction between VJ-S and r-NGOT occurred due to the presence of an electron-deficient center in the VJ-S. The VJ-S/r-NGOT displayed better photocatalytic production of hydrogen (apparent photonic efficiency = 0.91%) under visible light because VJ-S dye absorbs visible and near IR (NIR) wavelengths and gives a direct energy transfer to r-NGOT. (407) Ma and co-workers (408) enhanced the short circuit current and energy conversion of an DSSC by 35.8% and 26.8%, by incorporating activated G nanoplatelets (a-GNPs, 0.02 wt %) into a TiO2 film photoanode (see Figure 70). They also reported that an appropriate a-GNPs amount and a 3D nanostructure act as an efficient pathway for electrolyte ions and electrons, facilitating the rapid electron transfer and charge separation and suppressing the electron recombination and back transport reaction in DSSCs. (408)

Figure 70

Figure 70. Photovoltaic and impedance performances of the DSSCs with different G/TiO2 photoanodes. Reprinted with permission from ref 408. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Xu et al. (409) reported in a theoretical study the effect of O atoms on photocatalytic hydrogen evolution in g-C3N4 and rGO sheets hybrid materials. Interestingly, they showed that the O concentration changes the direct-gap hybrid to an indirect-gap one. Moreover, they showed that the interfaces in g-C3N4/rGO-3 and g-C3N4/rGO-4 hybrids are type-II heterojunction, and negatively charged O atoms in the rGO are active sites, which lead to high-efficiency photocatalytic generation of hydrogen (see Figure 71). (409) Another experiment reported that rGO does not affect the charge separation process but drastically increases the lifetime of photogenerated charge carriers. (410) In a recent study, Feifel and co-workers (411) developed a very simple way to generate a high photocurrent by using the photosystem I (PSI) on artificial interfaces of π-system-modified G electrodes. They concluded that the improved photocatalytic activity of the π-system-modified G electrodes could be attributed to the surface property adaptation and the excellent conductivity of G. The main benefit of coupling PSI to the modified G by covalent binding is reflected by the light-power dependency study, which shows a distinctly good current conversion under the light. (411) Moon et al. (412) systematically explored the interaction of rGO and TiO2 for efficient solar production of H2O2. They reported not only an organic-electron-donor-free, but also a noble-metal-free TiO2-based photocatalytic system for the production of H2O2 up to a millimolar level, and interestingly in situ formation of cobalt phosphate was achieved on the rGO/TiO2 hybrid. Lee et al. (413) developed a 3D monolayer G and TiO2 assembly for high-efficiency electrochemical photovoltaic cells. A 3D nanostructure with high carrier mobility gives a direct pathway for electrons to the current collector electrode for a photoanode in DSSCs. The energy conversion efficiency of DSSC was increased by ∼10% under the optimized 3D hybrid structure, and this is due to improved light harvesting and reduced electron recombination at the photoanode. (413) Despite the excellent progress in higher catalytic and photocatalytic activity, these materials usually exhibit low selectivity to desired products or a high deactivation rate due to the gradual migration and agglomeration of the active phase during the reaction. In addition, most catalysts and/or photocatalysts reported so far are recovered by tedious filtration or centrifugation. Thus, methods toward the design and synthesis of more efficient catalytic or photocatalytic systems remain a challenge.

Figure 71

Figure 71. General mechanism for H2 evolution from photocatalytic water splitting by the g-C3N4/rGO-3 hybrid, in which g-C3N4 acts as an electron sink providing the separation of electron–hole pairs and collects the electrons injected from the photoexcited rGO-3 for subsequent H2 production from reduction of H2O. Reprinted with permission from ref 409. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.

5.7 Biosensors and Bioimaging

Several studies have utilized noncovalently functionalized G/GO in biological applications, ranging from biosensing (human telomerase detection, disease-related diagnostics) to cell-imaging. (414-418) Gu and co-workers (419) developed a superparamagnetic functionalized G/Fe3O4@Au hybrid for a magnetically controlled solid-state electrochemiluminescence biosensing. They found that the hybrid exhibited high sensitivity for HeLa cells with a linear range of 1–20 × 104 cells/mL, long-term stability, high emission intensity, high reproducibility, excellent electron transfer, and superparamagnetic behavior. To directly sense atropine in complex matrixes, Bagheri and co-workers (420) advanced the field by developing Co3O4–G-modified carbon paste electrodes for selective detection of atropine in biological fluids, that is, urine and human serum. They reported that the recovery of spiked atropine in biological samples displayed standard values in the range from 97.6% to 103.2%, indicating the successive applicability of the proposed strategy for real clinical applications. In a recent report, Yoon and co-workers (421) utilized a noncovalently functionalized GO sheet on a patterned Au surface to isolate circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from blood samples of pancreatic, breast, and lung cancer patients. The noncovalently functionalized GO/Au showed excellent sensitivity toward capture of CTC, even at very low concentrations of target cells (see Figure 72); the principle of capture was explained in terms of morphological features of Au surfaces. (421)

Figure 72

Figure 72. Capture of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from breast cancer: (a) patient no. 6 (Br6); (b) patient no. 2 (Br2); and (c) quantification of CTCs. Capture of CTC from pancreatic cancer: (d) patient no. 2 (Pan2); (e) patient no. 9 (Pan9); and (f) quantification of CTCs. Capture of CTC from lung cancer: (g) patient no. 3 (L3); (h) quantification of CTCs; and (i) gene expression of captured CTCs via qRT-PCR. Reprinted with permission from ref 421. Copyright 2013 Nature Publishing Group.

In another study, a novel, all-electronic biosensor for the identification and quantification of opioids was developed by Lerner and co-workers. (422) It consists of an engineered μ-opioid receptor protein, with high binding affinity for opioids, which is chemically bonded to a G field-effect transistor to read out ligand binding. These G-based field-effect transistors are able to sense the opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone at ultralow concentrations (10 pg mL–1). Recently, Singh et al. (423) developed a noncovalently functionalized single layer G for sensitivity enhancement of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) immunosensors. There are two main goals for this approach: (i) amplification of the SPR signal through G, and (ii) control of the immobilization of biotinylated cholera toxin antigen on the copper coordinated nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) functionalized G as a single layer (the NTA was attached on G via pyrene derivatives through π–π interactions). (423) With this experimental setup, they reported the very low detection limit of 4 pg mL–1 for the anticholera toxin specific antibody. (423) Because of the many advantages (i.e., label-free, real-time, and high-throughput) of SPR imaging (SPRi) techniques for immunoassays, it is frequently used in sensors, but this method suffers from unfavorable detection limits. In this regard, Hu et al. (424) developed a dual signal amplification strategy utilizing polydopamine (PDA) functionalization of rGO (PDA–rGO) sheets for detection of biomarkers. The PDA–rGO-based devices exhibited detection limits for model biomarker of 500 pg mL–1 on an ultralow fouling SPRi chip over a wide range of conditions (see Figure 73). (424) Moreover, if HAuCl4 solution was allowed to flow through the chip surface for the second signal amplification, the SPRi signals on sensing spots drastically increased due to the growth of gold nanostructures on the captured PDA–rGO sheets, while on the control spots where no PDA–rGO was captured, the SPRi signal changes remained negligible (see Figure 73e,f). This implies that flowing HAuCl4 solution on the polymer brush-modified SPRi gold chip without precaptured PDA–rGO sheets does not lead to significant SPRi response; it is hypothesized that the densely packed polymer chains are able to efficiently prevent the HAuCl4 from accessing the gold chip and, hence, the deposit does not interfere with the signal amplification. The observed behavior was explained in terms of a high mass-density and dielectric constant of the gold nanostructures and the electromagnetic coupling between the gold nanostructures and the underlying gold thin film. Thus, as the deposition of gold exclusively takes place on PDA–rGO sheets, the SPRi signals stemming from the immunoassay were further efficiently and specifically enhanced by the second signal amplification, and the signal-to-noise ratio for the immunoassay was remarkably increased, securing improved performance. (424)

Figure 73

Figure 73. SPRi sensing profiles, differential images, and line profiles for detection in human serum: (a,b) Direct detection, (c,d) antibody-conjugated PDA–rGO for signal amplification, and (e,f) sequential Au coated. The red color line in panels (a), (c), and (e) displayed the results on the sensing point, and the black lines are collected from the control point. The blue boundaries in (b), (d), and (f) showed the four sensing points on the SPRi chip. Reprinted with permission from ref 424. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

In a separate study, Yi and co-workers (425) employed the advanced aptamer-two-photon dye (TPdye)/GO TPE (two-photon excitation) fluorescent nanosensing conjugate for in vitro or in vivo molecular probing in biological fluids, living cells, and zebrafish. They reported that the GO/aptamer–TPdye approach was a robust, sensitive, and selective sensor for quantitative detection of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) under the complex biological system with fast delivery into live cells or tissues and succeeded as a “signal-on” in vivo sensor for specific detection of target biomolecules. (425) Castrignano and co-workers (426) developed a drug screening based on human flavin-containing monooxygenase 3 (hFMO3 is the isoform present in the adult liver) immobilized on GO. The electrochemical property of hFMO3 was improved by GO in terms of electron transfer rate, current signal-to-noise ratio, and apparent surface coverage. Thus, this electrode showed good drug screening by N-oxidation of two therapeutic drugs, such as benzydamine and tamoxifen. (427) Koninti et al. (162) developed a GO-based molecular switching of ellipticine (E) to monitor the loading of anticancer drug onto GO and its release to DNA/RNA through direct optical detection. Formations of 3D assemblies involving GO and biomolecules by noncovalent interactions are responsible for biomolecule(s)-assisted fluorescence-switching of E. In another study, Xu and co-workers (427) synthesized G/Cu nanoparticle hybrids (G/CuNPs) as a surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrate for adenosine detection by means of chemical vapor deposition in the presence of methane and hydrogen. This hybrid exhibited a remarkable SERS improvement activity for adenosine (detected concentration in serum ∼5 nM). On the basis of the above discussion, they found that the noncovalently functionalized G/GO can be used in the detection and imaging of biomolecules. These results open these materials to future applications in medicine and biotechnology. Another example of sensing application is the use of GO/CDs hybrid for the selective labeling of cell cytoplasm. (428) Here, GO would act as a substrate for immobilization of quaternary ammonium modified carbon dots, thus enabling the preferential labeling of the cell cytoplasm while pristine carbon dots penetrate as fluorescent markers to the cell nucleus (see Figure 74). (428)

Figure 74

Figure 74. Fluorescence images of mouse fibroblast NIH/3T3 cells containing (a) CDs and (b,c) GO/CDs hybrids, demonstrating selective labeling of nuclei and cytoplasm. For pure carbon dots, a fast endocytosis occurred, and carbon dots readily entered cell nuclei (panel (a)). However, if GO/CDs hybrids were employed, penetration into cells was gradually inhibited upon increasing GO concentration (panels (b) and (c)). Reprinted with permission from ref 428. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

5.8 Biotherapeutics

There have been more concerns in medicine about fundamental approaches to deliver small molecule drugs/nucleotides/peptides to specific tissues. (429) In this context, several studies have utilized G/GO in the delivery of chemotherapeutics for the treatment of cancer for a host of medical conditions, NIR phototherapy, and even for the stem cells proliferation and differentiation on G/GO surface. (159, 430-433) In this way, small-size GO (small-GO) sheets show high NIR light absorbance and biocompatibility for potential photothermal therapy. (434) Moreover, GO displays excellent photothermal agent properties due to its nanosize, high photothermal efficiency, and low price as compared to other NIR photothermal agents such as gold particles and carbon nanotubes, etc. Figure 75 shows the effect of transdermal nano GO–hyaluronic acid (NGO–HA) conjugates for photothermal ablation therapy of melanoma skin cancer using a NIR laser. (435) In this hybrid, HA works as a transdermal delivery carrier of chemical drugs and biopharmaceuticals. Jung et al. (435) reported the photothermal ablation therapy of skin cancer by using the NGO and NGO–HA in SKH-1 mice inoculated with B16F1 cells on both dorsal flanks. The treatment NGO–HA showed that tumor tissues were completely ablated by the photothermal therapy with NIR irradiation (see Figure 76c). They also noticed that there was no recurrence of tumorigenesis in comparison to gradual tumor regrowth after photoablation applied to tumor tissues. On the other hand, PBS and NGO displayed no significant tumor ablation effect regardless of NIR irradiation (see Figure 76a,b). (435) The better transdermal delivery was observed for NGO–HA hybrid to tumor tissues in the skin of mice. This may be due to highly expressed HA receptors and relatively leaky structures around tumor tissues, enabling the increased permeation and retention of nanoparticles.

Figure 75

Figure 75. Schematic diagram for the transdermal delivery of nano GO–hyaluronic acid conjugates into melanoma skin cancer cells under a NIR laser. Reprinted with permission from ref 435. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

Figure 76

Figure 76. Pictures showing the effect of photothermal ablation therapy using NIR irradiation on the tumor growth in mice inoculated with B16F1 cells on both dorsal flanks after topical administration of (a) PBS, (b) NGO, and (c) NGO–HA. (d) Day-dependent relative tumor volume. (e) Time-dependent caspase-3 activity in tumor tissues to evaluate the heat-induced apoptosis (***P < 0.0001). Reprinted with permission from ref 435. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

For gene delivery, many reduction-sensitive biodegradable cationic polymers, which contain disulfide linkages, have been designed. (436) These materials degrade inside cells due to high concentrations of glutathione in the cytosol, which may reduce cytotoxicity and enhance transfection efficiency by avoiding accumulation of high-molecular-weight polycations and facilitating rapid release of DNA into cells. (436, 437) Recently, Yang et al. (438) introduced atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) initiation sites containing disulfide bonds onto surfaces of GO. They then modified the GO by ATRP with (2-dimethyl amino) ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) and synthesized a series of organic–inorganic composites (abbreviated as SS–GPDs) for efficient gene delivery (see Figure 77). They also showed that the SS–GPD materials can attach and absorb aromatic, water-insoluble drugs, such as CPT, for effective killing of cancer cells due to the conjugated structure of the GO basal plane. (438) In summary, they were able to design a new class of gene/drug delivery systems by tuning the attached polycation side chains on GO surfaces in the presence of ATRP.

Figure 77

Figure 77. Schematic diagram for fabrication of biocleavable PDMAEMA–GO sheets by ATRP for gene/drug delivery. Reprinted with permission from ref 438. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Noncovalently functionalized G/GO nanomaterials hold potential applications in the field of drug delivery due to their six-membered carbon ring structure, which can allow π–π interactions and hydrophobic interactions with aromatic rings of drugs. (159, 439) Additionally, glutathione (GSH) can also induce drug release caused by the disruption of noncovalent hydrophobic interactions and π–π stacking of GO aromatic rings. (440) In the case of nucleus drug delivery, a drug-loaded GO should be able to escape from the endosome after endocytosis-mediated cellular uptake followed by the discharge of the drug from the carrier during the formation of the drug–proteasome hybrid. (441) The endosomal escape due to photothermally induced heat is possible, and the drug can also be released by GSH in the presence of NIR irradiation. (442) Kim and co-workers (443) developed a nanosized PEG–BPEI–rGO composite consisting of rGO sheets covalently conjugated with branched polyethylenimine (BPEI) and polyethylene glycol (PEG). The water-stable PEG–BPEI–rGO could deposit a larger amount of doxorubicin (DOX) than unreduced PEG–BPEI–GO through π–π and hydrophobic interactions. (443) Subsequently, the PEG–BPEI–rGO/DOX complex was tested for the photothermal effect by NIR irradiation in both test tubes and cells. Interestingly, they found that this hybrid could escape from endosomes after cellular uptake by photothermally induced endosomal disruption and the proton sponge effect, followed by GSH-induced DOX release into the cytosol. (443) Yan et al. (444) developed a smart G hybrid with singlet oxygen for the photodynamic treatment of cancer cells. They reported that GO can act as a singlet oxygen generation (SOG) controller, which can reversibly quench and recover SOG again after introducing a target molecule. This recovery relies on the interaction intensity between GO and a photosensitizer. They also found that this complex worked as a carrier for larger loading and delivery of the photosensitizers to cancer cells. (444) More recently, Dong and co-workers (445) conducted a specific-gene-targeting agent delivery for improved therapeutics by utilizing a multifunctional hybrid of poly(l-lactide) (PLA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-grafted GQDs (f-GQDs). PEG and PLA in noncovalent functionalization of GQDs can enhance the super physiological stability and durable photoluminescence over a wide range of pH values, which is utilized for cell imaging. (445) These hybrids also showed improved biocompatibility and lower cytotoxicity. The targeting miRNA-21 agents were adsorbed on the high surface area of GQDs. Combined conjugation of miRNA-21-targeting and surviving-targeting agents displayed excellent inhibition of cancer cell growth and more apoptosis of cancer cells; this suggests that noncovalent functionalization of GQDs can be utilized in biomedical application of intracellular molecular analysis and clinical gene therapeutics. Although noncovalently functionalized G/GO offers many possible applications in the biomedical field, it demonstrated high toxicity, which is one of the biggest drawbacks that limits its applications in humans. (446) For this reason, further research is required to overcome this limitation.

6 Conclusions and Challenges

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Noncovalent functionalization involving mainly π–π interactions, van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonding, ionic interactions, or electron donor–acceptor complexes represents the strategic way to control the properties and improve the performance of G and GO in various advanced applications. In recent years, huge progress was registered in terms of theoretical description and experimental observation of interaction modes and morphological arrangements of various species onto G/GO surface also due to the unique contributions of ultrahigh vacuum scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). The STM description of the molecule assembly onto the G/GO substrate is still limited by the planarity and size of the studied molecules. From this point of view, the possibility to observe the interactions, conformations, and transformations of various larger molecules and biomolecules onto G/GO is still a big challenge with the possible principal impact in many sensing and biomedical applications. Another challenge is to increase the yield and quality of single-layer G produced by the chemical exfoliation of graphite in various organic solvents where π–π interactions constitute the main driving force.
A challenging issue is also to create Janus-like G composed of two different π–π stacked molecules on either side of the sheet (e.g., electron-donating and -withdrawing molecules) to tailor its electronic properties. Still, the noncovalent approaches possess limited success in the band gap control of G as compared to covalent routes starting from G, GO, or fluorographene and resulting in many new derivatives with variously opened band gaps. Similarly, neither G nor its derivatives exhibit self-sustainable magnetism despite many reported attempts to induce sp-based magnetism at room temperature. With this respect, the noncovalent functionalization of G/GO with magnetic nanoparticles (mainly iron oxides) provides an easy way to create a magnetically controllable system for delivery and separations in biomedicine or environmental applications. The use of suitable molecular species (molecular magnets) would be, in our opinion, another alternative with an advantage of the preservation of a 2D character of the magnetic hybrid.
Among tens of possible functionalization species, polymers play an important role mainly in noncovalent modification of G enhancing its hydrophilicity and biocompatibility. In the case of GO being hydrophilic due to the oxygen-bearing functional groups, the polymer functionalization brings an enhanced colloidal stability and suitable functional groups for further advanced nanoarchitecture for applications, for example, in targeted drug and gene delivery. Another interesting example of noncovalent functionalization is the creation of hybrids combining G/GO with other carbon nanoallotropes or G analogues. For example, the modification of G with OH-functionalized MWCTs resulted in a highly conductive and hydrophilic hybrid with a huge potential in the fields of conductive inks for inkjet printing or highly conductive polymers. The hybrids of G with other 2D analogues (e.g., MoS2 or WS2) create unique nanodevices acting as advanced biosensors, photoinduced memory device, Li-ion batteries, or field-effect transistors.
In the field of energy materials, the hybrids of G/GO with TiO2 also have a strong position with many reported applications in LIBs and mainly in dye-sensitized solar cells. Such hybrid photoanode materials would exhibit higher efficiency as compared to pristine TiO2 as G accelerates the electron transfer and decreases the charge recombination. However, the energy conversion improvement based on these hybrid materials is still a challenge mainly in terms of recent developments of perovskite-based solar cells.
Quantum dots (QD) are another important group of the nanomaterials discussed in this Review and commonly used for noncovalent modification of G/GO. These hybrids exhibit an excellent efficiency in many fields involving photocatalysis, supercapacitance, LIBs and NIBs, photoelectrochemical splitting of water, photosensitizers, water purification, biosensing, cell labeling, and catalysis. For example, QD/G hybrids have been extensively applied in photoelectrochemical solar cells with the added values based on transparency and conductivity of G materials as compared to traditionally applied electrodes. Importantly, noncovalent attachment is beneficial to ensure enhanced phototransfer processes between QD and G surface. Despite many applications of QD/G(GO) hybrids in various fields, there are still just a few reported applications in biomedicine. Here, the hybrids of biocompatible carbon dots with GO would play the principal role in the future as proved by recent application of such a hybrid for selective labeling of cell cytoplasm. Finally, metals and metal oxides noncovalently attached onto G/GO surface are today very promising mainly in the field of catalysis, separable catalysts, and electrochemical applications. In these applications, the G/GO substrate helps to control the homogeneous distribution and size of nanoparticles with improved reaction yields, selectivity, or recyclability of the catalyst. However, the aspects of the nanocatalyst release and leaching into the environments should be carefully addressed.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Kwang S. Kim - Center for Superfunctional Materials, Department of Chemistry, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 689-798, Korea Email: [email protected]
    • Radek Zboril - Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Palacky University in Olomouc, 17 Listopadu 1192/12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Vasilios Georgakilas - Material Science Department, University of Patras, 26504 Rio Patras, Greece
    • Jitendra N. Tiwari - Center for Superfunctional Materials, Department of Chemistry, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 689-798, Korea
    • K. Christian Kemp - Center for Superfunctional Materials, Department of Chemistry, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 689-798, Korea
    • Jason A. Perman - Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Palacky University in Olomouc, 17 Listopadu 1192/12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic
    • Athanasios B. Bourlinos - Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Palacky University in Olomouc, 17 Listopadu 1192/12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Biographies

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Vasilios Georgakilas

Vasilios Georgakilas received his B.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in Chemistry and Organic Chemistry from the University of Ioannina (Greece) in 1989 and 1998, respectively. He then worked in the Institute of Material Science of N.C.S.R. “Demokritos”, Greece, and at the University of Trieste, Italy, as a Postdoctoral Fellow and Research Associate. He currently holds the position of Assistant Professor at the Material Science Department, University of Patras, Greece. His research interests lie in the synthesis and organic functionalization of nanostructured materials, with a particular emphasis on carbon nanomaterials and their applications.

Jitendra N. Tiwari

Jitendra N. Tiwari received his Ph.D. degree in Electrochemistry from the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan, in 2009, working on the synthesis of highly durable catalysts for electrochemical energy devices. He worked as postdoctoral research fellows at the Institute of Nanotechnology, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan, and also at the Department of Chemistry, Pohang University of Science and Technology. Currently, he is a senior research scientist at the Department of Chemistry, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), and his work focuses on the development of graphene-based hybrid materials, and their applications in energy storage and conversion.

K. Christian Kemp

K. Christian Kemp received his Ph.D. in Chemistry at the Department of Chemistry, Pohang University of Science and Technology, under the guidance of Professor Kwang S. Kim. He is currently pursuing postdoctoral research at the Center for Ordered Nanoporous Materials Synthesis at Pohang University of Science and Technology. His interests include nanomaterials, catalysis, and organometallics for environmental applications.

Jason A. Perman

In 2013, Jason A. Perman joined the Research Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials at the Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic, as a Junior Researcher. He was born in Tampa, FL, in 1983 and received his B.Sc. (2006) and Ph.D. (2011) degrees from the University of South Florida under the supervision of Professor Michael J. Zaworotko in the field of supramolecular chemistry. He was a postdoctoral associate with Professor Josef Michl from 2011–2013 at the Institute of Organic and Biochemistry, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic. His current research interests include supramolecular chemistry, green chemistry, Langmuir films, metal–organic materials, and materials based on graphene and graphene oxide.

Athanasios B. Bourlinos

Athanasios B. Bourlinos holds B.Sc. (1991–1995), M.Sc. (1997–1999), and Ph.D. (1999–2002) degrees in Chemistry from Athens University, Greece. He spent 2 years (2002–2004) as a postdoctoral fellow at the Materials Science & Engineering Department, Cornell University (Ithaca, NY), 6 years (2005–2011) as a research associate at the Institute of Materials Science, NCSR “Demokritos” (Athens, Greece), and 1 year (2011–2012) as a research associate at the Physics Department, University of Ioannina (Ioannina, Greece). He currently holds a position as Assistant Professor at the Physics Department, University of Ioannina. His research area focuses on the synthesis or surface modification, characterization, and properties of nanoscale materials with emphasis on carbon nanostructures.

Kwang S. Kim

Kwang S. Kim received his Ph.D. degree from University of California, Berkeley. He was a postdoctoral fellow at IBM and a visiting professor or scientist at Rutgers University, MIT, and Columbia University. He was a professor in the Department of Chemistry, Pohang University of Science and Technology. Currently, he is a distinguished professor in the Department of Chemistry and the director of the Center for Superfunctional Materials at Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST). His research interest includes molecular sensing, nanomaterials, and molecular devices.

Radek Zboril

Radek Zboril received his Ph.D. degree at the Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic. After his doctoral studies, he spent a lot of time at universities around the world in locations such as Tokyo, Delaware, and Johannesburg. Currently, he is a professor at the Department of Physical Chemistry and a General Director of the Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials at the Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic. His research interests focus on nanomaterial research including iron- and iron oxide-based nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles, carbon nanostructures, and magnetic nanoparticles, their synthesis, physicochemical characterization, and applications in catalysis, water treatment, antimicrobial treatment, medicine, and biotechnology.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We acknowledge support from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (LO1305). K.S.K. acknowledges the support from Korean NRF (National Honor Scientist Program: 2010-0020414).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 446 other publications.

  1. 1
    Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K.; Morozov, S. V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S. V.; Grigorieva, I. V.; Firsov, A. A. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films Science 2004, 306, 666 669 DOI: 10.1126/science.1102896
  2. 2
    Balandin, A. A.; Ghosh, S.; Bao, W.; Calizo, I.; Teweldebrhan, D.; Miao, F.; Lau, C. N. Superior Thermal Conductivity of Single-Layer Graphene Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 902 907 DOI: 10.1021/nl0731872
  3. 3
    Lee, C.; Wei, X.; Kysar, J. W.; Hone, J. Measurement of the Elastic Properties and Intrinsic Strength of Monolayer Graphene Science 2008, 321, 385 388 DOI: 10.1126/science.1157996
  4. 4
    Schafhaeutl, C. Ueber die Verbindungen des Kohlenstoffes mit Silicium, Eisen und anderen Metallen, welche die verschiedenen Gallungen von Roheisen, Stahl und Schmiedeeisen bilden J. Prakt. Chem. 1840, 21, 129 157 DOI: 10.1002/prac.18400210117
  5. 5
    Bernal, J. D. The Structure of Graphite Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1924, 106, 749 773 DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1924.0101
  6. 6
    Wallace, P. R. The Band Theory of Graphite Phys. Rev. 1947, 71, 622 634 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.71.622
  7. 7
    Boehm, H. P.; Clauss, A.; Fisher, G. O.; Hofmann, U. Das Adsorptionsverhalten Sehr Dunner Kohlenstoff-Folien Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1962, 316, 119 127 DOI: 10.1002/zaac.19623160303
  8. 8
    Boehm, H. P.; Clauss, A.; Hofmann, U.; Fisher, G. O. Dunnste Kohlenstoff-Folien Z. Naturforsch., B: J. Chem. Sci. 1962, 17, 150 DOI: 10.1515/znb-1962-0302
  9. 9
    Hofmann, U.; Frenzel, A. Die Reduktion von Graphitoxyd mit Schwefelwasserstoff Colloid Polym. Sci. 1934, 68, 149 151 DOI: 10.1007/BF01451376
  10. 10
    Van Bommel, A. J.; Crombeen, J. E.; Vantooren, A. LEED and Auger-Electron Observation of SiC (0001) Surface Surf. Sci. 1975, 48, 463 472 DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(75)90419-7
  11. 11
    Foster, L. M.; Long, G.; Stumpf, H. C. Production of Graphite Single Crystals by the Thermal Decomposition of Aluminium Carbide Am. Mineral. 1958, 43, 285 296
  12. 12
    Land, T. A.; Michely, T.; Behm, R. J.; Hemminger, J. C.; Comsa, G. STM Investigation of Single Layer Graphite Structures Produced on Pt(111) by Hydrocarbon Decomposition Surf. Sci. 1992, 264, 261 270 DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(92)90183-7
  13. 13
    Forbeaux, I.; Themlin, J. M.; Debever, J. M. Heteroepitaxial Graphite on 6H-SiC(0001): Interface Formation Through Conduction-Band Electronic Structure Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1998, 58, 16396 16406 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.16396
  14. 14
    Grima, J. N.; Winczewski, S.; Mizzi, L.; Grech, M. C.; Cauchi, R.; Gatt, R.; Attard, D.; Wojciechowski, K. W.; Rybicki, J. Tailoring Graphene to Achieve Negative Poisson’s Ratio Properties Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 1455 1459 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201404106
  15. 15
    Kroto, H. W.; Heath, J. R.; O’Brien, S. C.; Curl, R. F.; Smalley, R. E. C60 – Buckminsterfullerene Nature 1985, 318, 162 163 DOI: 10.1038/318162a0
  16. 16
    Iijima, S.; Yudasaka, M.; Yamada, R.; Bandow, S.; Suenaga, K.; Kokai, F.; Takahashi, K. Nano-Aggregates of Single-Walled Graphitic Carbon Nano-Horns Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 309, 165 170 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00642-9
  17. 17
    Iijima, S. Helical Microtubules of Graphitic Carbon Nature 1991, 354, 56 58 DOI: 10.1038/354056a0
  18. 18
    Iijima, S.; Ichihashi, T. Single-Shell Carbon Nanotubes of 1-nm Diameter Nature 1993, 363, 603 605 DOI: 10.1038/363603a0
  19. 19
    Bethune, D. S.; Kiang, C. H.; de Vries, M. S.; Gorman, G.; Savoy, R.; Vazquez, J.; Beyers, R. Cobalt-Catalyzed Growth of Carbon Nanotubes with Single-Atomic-Layerwalls Nature 1993, 363, 605 607 DOI: 10.1038/363605a0
  20. 20
    Geim, A. K.; Novoselov, K. S. The Rise of Graphene Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183 191 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1849
  21. 21
    Bolotin, K. I.; Sikes, K. J.; Jiang, Z.; Klima, M.; Fudenberg, G.; Hone, J.; Kim, P.; Stormer, H. L. Ultrahigh Electron Mobility in Suspended Graphene Solid State Commun. 2008, 146, 351 355 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2008.02.024
  22. 22
    Abergel, D. S. L.; Apalkov, V.; Berashevich, J.; Ziegler, K.; Chakraborty, T. Properties of Graphene: a Theoretical Perspective Adv. Phys. 2010, 59, 261 482 DOI: 10.1080/00018732.2010.487978
  23. 23
    Zhang, Z. Z.; Chang, K. Tuning of Energy Levels and Optical Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2008, 77, 235411 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.235411
  24. 24
    Nakada, K.; Fujita, M.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S. Edge State in Graphene Ribbons: Nanometer Size Effect and Edge Shape Dependence Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1996, 54, 17954 17961 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.17954
  25. 25
    Kim, W. Y.; Kim, K. S. Prediction of Very Large Values of Magnetoresistance in a Graphene Nanoribbon Device Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 408 412 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2008.163
  26. 26
    Nair, R. R.; Blake, P.; Grigorenko, A. N.; Novoselov, K. S.; Booth, T. J.; Stauber, T.; Peres, N. M. R.; Geim, A. K. Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene Science 2008, 320, 1308 DOI: 10.1126/science.1156965
  27. 27
    Staudenmaier, L. Verfahren zur Darstellung der Graphitsäure Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1898, 31, 1481 1487 DOI: 10.1002/cber.18980310237
  28. 28
    Hummers, W. S.; Offeman, R. E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339 DOI: 10.1021/ja01539a017
  29. 29
    Marcano, D. C.; Kosynkin, D. V.; Berlin, J. M.; Sinitskii, A.; Sun, Z. Z.; Slesarev, A.; Alemany, L. B.; Lu, W.; Tour, J. M. Improved Synthesis of Graphene Oxide ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4806 4814 DOI: 10.1021/nn1006368
  30. 30
    Dryer, D. R.; Park, S.; Bielawski, C. W.; Ruoff, R. S. The Chemistry of Graphene Oxide Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 229 240 DOI: 10.1039/B917103G
  31. 31
    Hofmann, U.; Konig, E. Untersuchungen über Graphitoxyd Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1937, 234, 311 336 DOI: 10.1002/zaac.19372340405
  32. 32
    Fisher, E. Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1894, 27, 2985 2993 DOI: 10.1002/cber.18940270364
  33. 33
    Lehn, J. M. Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and Perspectives; Wiley: New York, 1995.
  34. 34
    McMurry, J.; Fayl McCarty, R. C. Chemistry; Pearson Education: New York, 2004.
  35. 35
    Lide, D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 85th ed.; Taylor & Francis: New York, 2004.
  36. 36
    Atkins, P.; de Paula, J. Physical Chemistry, 7th ed.; W. H. Freeman: New York, 2002.
  37. 37
    Steed, J. W.; Atwood, J. L. Supramolecular Chemistry, 2nd ed; Wiley: New York, 2013.
  38. 38
    Skinner, H. A.; Connor, J. A. Metal-Ligand Bond-Energies in Organometallic Compounds Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 79 88 DOI: 10.1351/pac198557010079
  39. 39
    Smithrud, D. B.; Sanford, E. M.; Chao, I.; Ferguson, S. B.; Carcanague, D. R.; Evanseck, J. D.; Houk, K. N.; Diederich, F. Solvent Effects in Molecular Recognition Pure Appl. Chem. 1990, 62, 2227 2236 DOI: 10.1351/pac199062122227
  40. 40
    Southall, N. T.; Dill, K. A.; Haymet, A. D. J. A View of the Hydrophobic Effect J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 521 533 DOI: 10.1021/jp015514e
  41. 41
    Hunter, C. A.; Lawson, K. R.; Perkins, C.; Urch, C. J. Aromatic Interactions J. Chem. Soc. Perk. T. 2001, 2, 651 669 DOI: 10.1039/b008495f
  42. 42
    Zhang, Z. X.; Huang, H. L.; Yang, X. M.; Zang, L. Tailoring Electronic Properties of Graphene by pi-pi Stacking with Aromatic Molecules J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 2897 2905 DOI: 10.1021/jz201273r
  43. 43
    Kozlov, S. M.; Vines, F.; Gorling, A. On the Interaction of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds with Graphene Carbon 2012, 50, 2482 2492 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.070
  44. 44
    De Feyter, S.; De Schryver, F. C. Two-Dimensional Supramolecular Self-Assembly Probed by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32, 139 150 DOI: 10.1039/b206566p
  45. 45
    Foster, J. S.; Frommer, J. E. Imaging of Liquid-Crystals Using a Tunnelling Microscope Nature 1988, 333, 542 545 DOI: 10.1038/333542a0
  46. 46
    Griessl, S.; Lackinger, M.; Edelwirth, M.; Hietschold, M.; Heckl, W. M. Self-Assembled Two-Dimensional Molecular Host-Guest Architectures from Trimesic Acid Single Mol. 2002, 3, 25 31 DOI: 10.1002/1438-5171(200204)3:1<25::AID-SIMO25>3.0.CO;2-K
  47. 47
    Lackinger, M.; Griessl, S.; Heckl, W. M.; Hietschold, M. STM and STS of Coronene on HOPG(0001) in UHV – Adsorption of the Smallest Possible Graphite Flakes on Graphite Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002, 374, 685 687 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-002-1458-9
  48. 48
    Shayeganfar, F.; Rochefort, A. Electronic Properties of Self-Assembled Trimesic Acid Monolayer on Graphene Langmuir 2014, 30, 9707 9716 DOI: 10.1021/la501619b
  49. 49
    Zhou, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Fang, Y.; Wang, C. Switchable Supramolecular Assemblies on Graphene Nanoscale 2014, 6, 8387 8391 DOI: 10.1039/c4nr01796j
  50. 50
    MacLeod, J. M.; Lipton-Duffin, J. A.; Cui, D.; De Feyter, S.; Rosei, F. Substrate Effects in the Supramolecular Assembly of 1,3,5-Benzene Tricarboxylic Acid on Graphite and Graphene Langmuir 2015, 31, 7016 7024 DOI: 10.1021/la5048886
  51. 51
    Chen, W.; Chen, S.; Qi, D. C.; Gao, X. Y.; Wee, A. T. S. Surface Transfer p-Type Doping of Epitaxial Graphene J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10418 10422 DOI: 10.1021/ja071658g
  52. 52
    Coletti, C.; Riedl, C.; Lee, D. S.; Krauss, B.; Patthey, L.; von Klitzing, K.; Smet, J. H.; Starke, U. Charge Neutrality and Band-Gap Tuning of Epitaxial Graphene on SiC by Molecular Doping Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 81, 235401 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.235401
  53. 53
    Stradi, D.; Garnica, M.; Diaz, C.; Calleja, F.; Barja, S.; Martin, N.; Alcami, M.; de Parga, A. L. V.; Miranda, R.; Martin, F. Controlling the Spatial Arrangement of Organic Magnetic Anions Adsorbed on Epitaxial Graphene on Ru(0001) Nanoscale 2014, 6, 15271 15279 DOI: 10.1039/C4NR02917H
  54. 54
    Huang, H.; Chen, S.; Gao, X.; Chen, W.; Wee, A. T. S. Structural and Electronic Properties of PTCDA Thin Films on Epitaxial Graphene ACS Nano 2009, 3, 3431 3436 DOI: 10.1021/nn9008615
  55. 55
    Lauffer, P.; Emtsev, K. V.; Graupner, R.; Seyller, T.; Ley, L. Molecular and Electronic Structure of PTCDA on Bilayer Graphene on SiC(0001) Studied with Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Phys. Status Solidi B 2008, 245, 2064 2067 DOI: 10.1002/pssb.200879615
  56. 56
    Wang, Q. H.; Hersam, M. C. Room-Temperature Molecular-Resolution Characterization of Self-Assembled Organic Monolayers on Epitaxial Graphene Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 206 211 DOI: 10.1038/nchem.212
  57. 57
    Emery, J. D.; Wang, Q. H.; Zarrouati, M.; Fenter, P.; Hersam, M. C.; Bedzyk, M. J. Structural Analysis of PTCDA Monolayers on Epitaxial Graphene with Ultra-High Vacuum Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and High-Resolution X-ray Reflectivity Surf. Sci. 2011, 605, 1685 1693 DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2010.11.008
  58. 58
    Pollard, A. J.; Perkins, E. W.; Smith, N. A.; Saywell, A.; Goretzki, G.; Phillips, A. G.; Argent, S. P.; Sachdev, H.; Mueller, F.; Huefner, S. Supramolecular Assemblies Formed on an Epitaxial Graphene Superstructure Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1794 1799 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200905503
  59. 59
    Karmel, H. J.; Garramone, J. J.; Emery, J. D.; Kewalramani, S.; Bedzyk, M. J.; Hersam, M. C. Self-Assembled Organic Monolayers on Epitaxial Graphene with Enhanced Structural and Thermal Stability Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 8852 8855 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC02761B
  60. 60
    Kozlov, S. M.; Vines, F.; Gorling, A. Bandgap Engineering of Graphene by Physisorbed Adsorbates Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2638 2643 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201100171
  61. 61
    Zhang, L. M.; Yu, J. W.; Yang, M. M.; Xie, Q.; Peng, H. L.; Liu, Z. F. Janus Graphene from Asymmetric Two-Dimensional Chemistry Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1443 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2464
  62. 62
    Hernandez, Y.; Nicolosi, V.; Lotya, M.; Blighe, F. M.; Sun, Z.; De, S.; McGovern, I. T.; Holland, B.; Byrne, M.; Gun’Ko, Y. K. High-Yield Production of Graphene by Liquid-Phase Exfoliation of Graphite Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 563 568 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2008.215
  63. 63
    Pykal, M.; Safarova, K.; Siskova, K. M.; Jurecka, P.; Bourlinos, A. B.; Zboril, R.; Otyepka, M. Lipid Enhanced Exfoliation for Production of Graphene Nanosheets J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 11800 11803 DOI: 10.1021/jp401277g
  64. 64
    Hernandez, Y.; Lotya, M.; Rickard, D.; Bergin, S. D.; Coleman, J. N. Measurement of Multicomponent Solubility Parameters for Graphene Facilitates Solvent Discovery Langmuir 2010, 26, 3208 3213 DOI: 10.1021/la903188a
  65. 65
    Khan, U.; O’Neill, A.; Lotya, M.; De, S.; Coleman, J. N. High-Concentration Solvent Exfoliation of Graphene Small 2010, 6, 864 871 DOI: 10.1002/smll.200902066
  66. 66
    O’Neill, A.; Khan, U.; Nirmalraj, P. N.; Boland, J.; Coleman, J. N. Graphene Dispersion and Exfoliation in Low Boiling Point Solvents J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 5422 5428 DOI: 10.1021/jp110942e
  67. 67
    Coleman, J. N. Liquid Exfoliation of Defect-Free Graphene Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 14 22 DOI: 10.1021/ar300009f
  68. 68
    Hughes, J. M.; Ahrene, D.; Coleman, J. N. Generalizing Solubility Parameter Theory to Apply to One- and Two-Dimensional Solutes and to Incorporate Dipolar Interactions J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 127, 4483 4491 DOI: 10.1002/app.38051
  69. 69
    Nicolosi, V.; Chhowalla, M.; Kanatzidis, M. G.; Strano, M. S.; Coleman, J. N. Liquid Exfoliation of Layered Materials Science 2013, 340, 1226419 DOI: 10.1126/science.1226419
  70. 70
    Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Abidi, N.; Cabrales, L. Wettability and Surface Free Energy of Graphene Films Langmuir 2009, 25, 11078 11081 DOI: 10.1021/la901402f
  71. 71
    Hansen, C. M. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User’s Handbook, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: New York, 2007.
  72. 72
    Hansen, C. M. The Three Dimensional Solubility Parameter and Solvent Diffusion Coefficient: Their Importance in Surface Coating Formulation; Danish Technical Press, 1967.
  73. 73
    Hildebrand, J. H.; Prausnitz, J. M.; Scott, R. L. Regular and Related Solutions: the Solubility of Gases, Liquids, and Solids; van Nostrand Reinhold Co.: New York, 1970.
  74. 74
    Zhang, Y. H.; Liu, C. J.; Shi, W. Q.; Wang, Z. Q.; Dai, L. M.; Zhang, X. Direct Measurements of the Interaction between Pyrene and Graphite in Aqueous Media by Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy: Understanding the π-π Interactions Langmuir 2007, 23, 7911 7915 DOI: 10.1021/la700876d
  75. 75
    Manohar, S.; Mantz, A. R.; Bancroft, K. E.; Hui, C. Y.; Jagota, A.; Vezenov, D. V. Peeling Single-Stranded DNA from Graphite Surface to Determine Oligonucleotide Binding Energy by Force Spectroscopy Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 4365 4372 DOI: 10.1021/nl8022143
  76. 76
    Georgakilas, V.; Otyepka, M.; Bourlinos, A. B.; Chandra, V.; Kim, N.; Kemp, K. C.; Hobza, P.; Zboril, R.; Kim, K. S. Functionalization of Graphene: Covalent and Non-Covalent Approaches, Derivatives and Applications Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 6156 6214 DOI: 10.1021/cr3000412
  77. 77
    Lee, E. C.; Kim, D.; Jurečka, P.; Tarakeshwar, P.; Hobza, P.; Kim, K. S. Understanding of Assembly Phenomena by Aromatic-Aromatic Interactions: Benzene Dimer and the Substituted Systems J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 3446 3457 DOI: 10.1021/jp068635t
  78. 78
    Su, Q.; Pang, S.; Alijani, V.; Li, C.; Feng, X.; Muellen, K. Composites of Graphene with Large Aromatic Molecules Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 3191 3195 DOI: 10.1002/adma.200803808
  79. 79
    Zhang, X. F.; Liu, S. P.; Shao, X. N. Noncovalent Binding of Xanthene and Phthalocyanine Dyes with Graphene Sheets: The Effect of the Molecular Structure Revealed by a Photophysical Study Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2013, 113, 92 99 DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2013.04.066
  80. 80
    Yang, X.; Li, J.; Wen, T.; Ren, X.; Huang, Y.; Wang, X. Adsorption of Naphthalene and Its Derivatives on Magnetic Graphene Composites and the Mechanism Investigation Colloids Surf., A 2013, 422, 118 125 DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.11.063
  81. 81
    Zhang, X. F.; Shao, X. Binding Ability of Different Carbon Nano-Materials with Aromatic Phthalocyanine Molecules: Comparison between Graphene and Graphene Oxide J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2014, 278, 69 74 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2014.01.001
  82. 82
    Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Chen, B. Adsorption of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Graphene and Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 4817 4825 DOI: 10.1021/es405227u
  83. 83
    Chen, I. W. P.; Huang, C. Y.; Jhou, S. H. S.; Zhang, Y. W. Exfoliation and Performance Properties of Non-Oxidized Graphene in Water Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3928 DOI: 10.1038/srep03928
  84. 84
    Bourlinos, A. B.; Georgakilas, V.; Zboril, R.; Steriotis, T. A.; Stubos, A. K. Liquid-Phase Exfoliation of Graphite towards Solubilized Graphenes Small 2009, 5, 1841 1845 DOI: 10.1002/smll.200900242
  85. 85
    Kim, J.; Song, S. H.; Im, H. G.; Yoon, G.; Lee, D.; Choi, C.; Kim, J.; Bae, B. S.; Kang, K.; Jeon, S. Moisture Barrier Composites Made of Non-Oxidized Graphene Flakes Small 2015, 11, 3124 3129 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201403647
  86. 86
    Lee, D. W.; Kim, T.; Lee, M. An Amphiphilic Pyrene Sheet for Selective Functionalization of Graphene Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 8259 8261 DOI: 10.1039/c1cc12868j
  87. 87
    Yang, H.; Hernandez, Y.; Schlierf, A.; Felten, A.; Eckmann, A.; Johal, S.; Louette, P.; Pireaux, J. J.; Feng, X.; Muellen, K. A Simple Method for Graphene Production Based on Exfoliation of Graphite in Water Using 1-Pyrenesulfonic Acid Sodium Salt Carbon 2013, 53, 357 365 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.11.022
  88. 88
    Jang, J. H.; Rangappa, D.; Kwon, Y. U.; Honma, I. Direct Preparation of 1-PSA Modified Graphene Nanosheets by Supercritical Fluidic Exfoliation and Its Electrochemical Properties J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 3462 3466 DOI: 10.1039/C0JM02472D
  89. 89
    An, X. H.; Simmons, T. J.; Shah, R.; Wolfe, C.; Lewis, K. M.; Washington, M.; Nayak, S. K.; Talapatra, S.; Kar, S. Stable Aqueous Dispersions of Noncovalently Functionalized Graphene from Graphite and their Multifunctional High-Performance Applications Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 4295 4301 DOI: 10.1021/nl903557p
  90. 90
    Dong, X. C.; Shi, Y. M.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, D. M.; Ye, J.; Yao, Y. G.; Gao, F.; Ni, Z. H.; Yu, T.; Shen, Z. X. Symmetry Breaking of Graphene Monolayers by Molecular Decoration Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 135501 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.135501
  91. 91
    Zhang, M.; Parajuli, R. R.; Mastrogiovanni, D.; Dai, B.; Lo, P.; Cheung, W.; Brukh, R.; Chiu, P. L.; Zhou, T.; Liu, Z. F. Production of Graphene Sheets by Direct Dispersion with Aromatic Healing Agents Small 2010, 6, 1100 1107 DOI: 10.1002/smll.200901978
  92. 92
    Schlierf, A.; Yang, H.; Gebremedhn, E.; Treossi, E.; Ortolani, L.; Chen, L.; Minoia, A.; Morandi, V.; Samori, P.; Casiraghi, C. Nanoscale Insight into the Exfoliation Mechanism of Graphene with Organic Dyes: Effect of Charge, Dipole and Molecular Structure Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4205 4216 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr00258f
  93. 93
    Song, S. H.; Park, K. H.; Kim, B. H.; Choi, Y. W.; Jun, G. H.; Lee, D. J.; Kong, B. S.; Paik, K. W.; Jeon, S. Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of Epoxy–Graphene Composites by Using Non-Oxidized Graphene Flakes with Non-Covalent Functionalization Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 732 737 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201202736
  94. 94
    Khanra, P.; Uddin, M. E.; Kim, N. H.; Kuila, T.; Lee, S. H.; Lee, J. H. Electrochemical Performance of Reduced Graphene Oxide Surface-Modified with 9-Anthracene Carboxylic Acid RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 6443 6451 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA12356E
  95. 95
    Bose, S.; Kuila, T.; Mishra, A. K.; Kim, N. H.; Lee, J. H. Preparation of Non-Covalently Functionalized Graphene Using 9-Anthracene Carboxylic Acid Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 405603 DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/40/405603
  96. 96
    Das, S.; Irin, F.; Ahmed, H. S. T.; Cortinas, A. B.; Wajid, A. S.; Parviz, D.; Jankowski, A. F.; Kato, M.; Green, M. J. Non-Covalent Functionalization of Pristine Few-Layer Graphene Using Triphenylene Derivatives for Conductive Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) Composites Polymer 2012, 53, 2485 2494 DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.03.012
  97. 97
    Ghosh, A.; Rao, K. V.; George, S. J.; Rao, C. N. R. Noncovalent Functionalization, Exfoliation, and Solubilization of Graphene in Water by Employing a Fluorescent Coronene Carboxylate Chem. - Eur. J. 2010, 16, 2700 2704 DOI: 10.1002/chem.200902828
  98. 98
    Ma, W. S.; Wu, L.; Yang, F.; Wang, S. F. Non-Covalently Modified Reduced Graphene Oxide/Polyurethane Nanocomposites with Good Mechanical and Thermal Properties J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 562 571 DOI: 10.1007/s10853-013-7736-4
  99. 99
    Lonkar, S. P.; Bobenrieth, A.; De Winter, J.; Gerbaux, P.; Raquez, J. M.; Dubois, P. A Supramolecular Approach toward Organo-Dispersible Graphene and Its Straightforward Polymer Nanocomposites J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 18124 18126 DOI: 10.1039/c2jm34234k
  100. 100
    Yang, Y. K.; He, C. E.; Peng, R. G.; Baji, A.; Du, X. S.; Huang, Y. L.; Xie, X. L.; Mai, Y. W. Non-Covalently Modified Graphene Sheets by Imidazolium Ionic Liquids for Multifunctional Polymer Nanocomposites J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 5666 5675 DOI: 10.1039/c2jm16006d
  101. 101
    Bari, R.; Tamas, G.; Irin, F.; Aquino, A. J. A.; Green, M. J.; Quitevis, E. L. Direct Exfoliation of Graphene in Ionic Liquids with Aromatic Groups Colloids Surf., A 2014, 463, 63 69 DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.09.024
  102. 102
    Zhang, B.; Ning, W.; Zhang, J.; Qiao, X.; Zhang, J.; He, J.; Liu, C. Y. Stable Dispersions of Reduced Graphene Oxide in Ionic Liquids J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 5401 5403 DOI: 10.1039/c0jm01029d
  103. 103
    Kim, T. Y.; Lee, H. W.; Kim, J. E.; Suh, K. S. Synthesis of Phase Transferable Graphene Sheets Using Ionic Liquid Polymers ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1612 1618 DOI: 10.1021/nn901525e
  104. 104
    Geng, J.; Jung, H. T. Porphyrin Functionalized Graphene Sheets in Aqueous Suspensions: From the Preparation of Graphene Sheets to Highly Conductive Graphene Films J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 8227 8234 DOI: 10.1021/jp1008779
  105. 105
    Xu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Bai, H.; Hong, W.; Li, C.; Shi, G. Chemically Converted Graphene Induced Molecular Flattening of 5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(1-methyl-4-pyridinio)porphyrin and Its Application for Optical Detection of Cadmium(II) Ions J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13490 13497 DOI: 10.1021/ja905032g
  106. 106
    Arramel, A.; Castellanos-Gomez, B.; van Wees, J. Band Gap Opening of Graphene by Noncovalent π-π Interaction with Porphyrins Graphene 2013, 2, 102 108 DOI: 10.4236/graphene.2013.23015
  107. 107
    Bozkurt, E.; Acar, M.; Onganer, Y.; Meral, K. Rhodamine 101-Graphene Oxide Composites in Aqueous Solution: the Fluorescence Quenching Process of Rhodamine 101 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 18276 18281 DOI: 10.1039/C4CP01492H
  108. 108
    Jiang, B. P.; Hu, L. F.; Wang, D. J.; Ji, S. C.; Shen, X. C.; Liang, H. Graphene Loading Water-Soluble Phthalocyanine for Dual-Modality Photothermal/Photodynamic Therapy via a One-Step Method J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 7141 7148 DOI: 10.1039/C4TB01038H
  109. 109
    Chien, C. T.; Li, S. S.; Lai, W. J.; Yeh, Y. C.; Chen, H. A.; Chen, I. S.; Chen, L. C.; Chen, K. H.; Nemoto, T.; Isoda, S. Tunable Photoluminescence from Graphene Oxide Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6662 6666 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201200474
  110. 110
    Zhang, X. F.; Shao, X.; Liu, S. Dual Fluorescence of Graphene Oxide: A Time-Resolved Study J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 7308 7313 DOI: 10.1021/jp301755b
  111. 111
    Loh, K. P.; Bao, Q. L.; Eda, G.; Chhowalla, M. Graphene Oxide as a Chemically Tunable Platform for Optical Applications Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 1015 1024 DOI: 10.1038/nchem.907
  112. 112
    Iliut, M.; Gabudean, A. M.; Leordean, C.; Simon, T.; Teodorescu, C. M.; Astilean, S. Riboflavin Enhanced Fluorescence of Highly Reduced Graphene Oxide Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 586, 127 131 DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.09.032
  113. 113
    Fernandez-Merino, M. J.; Paredes, J. I.; Villar-Rodil, S.; Guardia, L.; Solis-Fernandez, P.; Salinas-Torres, D.; Cazorla-Amoros, D.; Morallon, E.; Martinez-Alonso, A.; Tascon, J. M. D. Investigating the Influence of Surfactants on the Stabilization of Aqueous Reduced Graphene Oxide Dispersions and the Characteristics of Their Composite Films Carbon 2012, 50, 3184 3194 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.10.039
  114. 114
    Bourlinos, A. B.; Georgakilas, V.; Zboril, R.; Steriotis, T. A.; Stubos, A. K.; Trapalis, C. Aqueous-Phase Exfoliation of Graphite in the Presence of Polyvinylpyrrolidone for the Production of Water-Soluble Graphenes Solid State Commun. 2009, 149, 2172 2176 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2009.09.018
  115. 115
    Liang, Y.; Wu, D.; Feng, X.; Mullen, K. Dispersion of Graphene Sheets in Organic Solvent Supported by Ionic Interactions Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1 5 DOI: 10.1002/adma.200803160
  116. 116
    Carrasco, P. M.; Montes, S.; Garcia, I.; Borghei, M.; Jiang, H.; Odriozola, I.; Cabanero, G.; Ruiz, V. High-Concentration Aqueous Dispersions of Graphene Produced by Exfoliation of Graphite Using Cellulose Nanocrystals Carbon 2014, 70, 157 163 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.12.086
  117. 117
    Lotya, M.; King, P. J.; Khan, U.; De, S.; Coleman, J. N. High-Concentration, Surfactant-Stabilized Graphene Dispersions ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3155 3162 DOI: 10.1021/nn1005304
  118. 118
    Lotya, M.; Hernandez, Y.; King, P. J.; Smith, R. J.; Nicolosi, V.; Karlsson, L. S.; Blighe, F. M.; De, S.; Wang, Z.; McGovern, I. T. Liquid Phase Production of Graphene by Exfoliation of Graphite in Surfactant/Water Solutions J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3611 3620 DOI: 10.1021/ja807449u
  119. 119
    Cai, M.; Thorpe, D.; Adamson, D. H.; Schniepp, H. C. Methods of Graphite Exfoliation J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 24992 25002 DOI: 10.1039/c2jm34517j
  120. 120
    Yang, Q.; Pan, X.; Huang, F.; Li, K. Fabrication of High-Concentration and Stable Aqueous Suspensions of Graphene Nanosheets by Noncovalent Functionalization with Lignin and Cellulose Derivatives J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 3811 3816 DOI: 10.1021/jp910232x
  121. 121
    Choi, E. Y.; Han, T. H.; Hong, J.; Kim, J. E.; Lee, S. H.; Kim, H. W.; Kim, S. O. Noncovalent Functionalization of Graphene with End-Functional Polymers J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 1907 1912 DOI: 10.1039/b919074k
  122. 122
    Lian, M.; Fan, J.; Shi, Z.; Li, H.; Yin, J. Kevlar-Functionalized Graphene Nanoribbon for Polymer Reinforcement Polymer 2014, 55, 2578 2587 DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.03.059
  123. 123
    Zhang, J.; Xu, Y.; Cui, L.; Fu, A.; Yang, W.; Barrow, C.; Liu, J. Mechanical Properties of Graphene Films Enhanced by Homo-Telechelic Functionalized Polymer Fillers via p–p Stacking Interactions Composites, Part A 2015, 71, 1 8 DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.013
  124. 124
    Chandra, V.; Kim, K. S. Highly Selective Adsorption of Hg2+ by Polypyrrole-Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 3942 3944 DOI: 10.1039/c1cc00005e
  125. 125
    Stankovich, S.; Piner, R. D.; Chen, X.; Wu, N.; Nguyen, S. T.; Ruoff, R. S. Stable Aqueous Dispersions of Graphitic Nanoplatelets via the Reduction of Exfoliated Graphite Oxide in the Presence of Poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 155 158 DOI: 10.1039/B512799H
  126. 126
    Bai, H.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Li, C.; Shi, G. Non-Covalent Functionalization of Graphene Sheets by Sulfonated Polyaniline Chem. Commun. 2009, 1667 1669 DOI: 10.1039/b821805f
  127. 127
    Matos, C. F.; Galembeck, F.; Zarbin, A. J. G. Multifunctional and Environmentally Friendly Nanocomposites between Natural Rubber and Graphene or Graphene Oxide Carbon 2014, 78, 469 479 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.028
  128. 128
    Hsiao, S. T.; Ma, C. C. M.; Tien, H. W.; Liao, W. H.; Wang, Y. S.; Li, S. M.; Huang, Y. C. Using a Non-Covalent Modification to Prepare a High Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Performance Graphene Nanosheet/Water-Borne Polyurethane Composite Carbon 2013, 60, 57 66 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.056
  129. 129
    Lee, D. Y.; Khatun, Z.; Lee, J. H.; Lee, Y.; In, I. Blood Compatible Graphene/Heparin Conjugate through Noncovalent Chemistry Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 336 341 DOI: 10.1021/bm101031a
  130. 130
    Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Huang, X.; Zhou, X.; Wu, H.; Guo, S. Assembly of Graphene Oxide–Enzyme Conjugates through Hydrophobic Interaction Small 2012, 8, 154 159 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201101695
  131. 131
    Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Yang, H.; Huang, X.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Guo, S. Graphene Oxide as a Matrix for Enzyme Immobilization Langmuir 2010, 26, 6083 6085 DOI: 10.1021/la904014z
  132. 132
    Alwarappan, S.; Boyapalle, S.; Kumar, A.; Li, C. Z.; Mohapatra, S. Comparative Study of Single-, Few-, and Multilayered Graphene toward Enzyme Conjugation and Electrochemical Response J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 6556 6559 DOI: 10.1021/jp211201b
  133. 133
    Heien, M. L. A. V.; Khan, A. S.; Ariansen, J. L.; Cheer, J. F.; Phillips, P. E. M.; Wassum, K. M.; Wightman, R. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102, 10023 10028 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0504657102
  134. 134
    Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Tang, L.; Lu, J.; Li, J. Application of Graphene-Modified Electrode for Selective Detection of Dopamine Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 889 892 DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.02.013
  135. 135
    Kim, Y. R.; Bong, S.; Kang, Y. J.; Yang, Y.; Mahajan, R. K.; Kim, J. S.; Kim, H. Electrochemical Detection of Dopamine in the Presence of Ascorbic Acid Using Graphene Modified Electrodes Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 25, 2366 2369 DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.02.031
  136. 136
    Lian, Q.; He, Z.; He, Q.; Luo, A.; Yan, K.; Zhang, D.; Lu, X.; Zhou, X. Simultaneous Determination of Ascorbic Acid, Dopamine and Uric Acid Based on Tryptophan Functionalized Graphene Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 823, 32 39 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.03.032
  137. 137
    Zhang, W.; Chai, Y.; Yuan, R.; Chen, S.; Han, J.; Yuan, D. Facile Synthesis of Graphene Hybrid Tube-Like Structure for Simultaneous Detection of Ascorbic Acid, Dopamine, Uric Acid and Tryptophan Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 756, 7 12 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.10.044
  138. 138
    Lv, M.; Mei, T.; Zhang, C.; Wang, X. Selective and Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Dopamine Based on Water-Soluble Porphyrin Functionalized Graphene Nanocomposites RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 9261 9270 DOI: 10.1039/c3ra47234e
  139. 139
    Zhang, Y.; Xia, Z.; Liu, H.; Yang, M.; Lin, L.; Li, Q. Hemin Graphene Oxide-Pristine Carbon Nanotubes Complexes with Intrinsic Peroxidase-Like Activity for the Detection of H2O2 and Simultaneous Determination for Trp, AA, DA, and UA Sens. Actuators, B 2013, 188, 496 501 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.07.010
  140. 140
    Pandikumar, A.; Thien Soon How, G.; See, T. P.; Omar, F. S.; Jayabal, S.; Zangeneh Kamali, K.; Yusoff, N.; Jamil, A.; Ramaraj, R.; Abraham John, S. Graphene and Its Nanocomposite Material Based Electrochemical Sensor Platform for Dopamine RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 63296 63323 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA13777A
  141. 141
    Min, S. K.; Kim, W. Y.; Cho, Y.; Kim, K. S. Fast DNA Sequencing with a Graphene-Based Nanochannel Device Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 162 165 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2010.283
  142. 142
    Zhu, C.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. Graphene and Graphene-Like 2D Materials for Optical Biosensing and Bioimaging: A Review 2D Mater. 2015, 2, 032004 DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/2/3/032004
  143. 143
    Liu, Y.; Dong, X.; Chen, P. Biological and Chemical Sensors Based on Graphene Materials Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2283 2307 DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15270J
  144. 144
    Green, N. S.; Norton, M. L. Interactions of DNA with graphene and sensing applications of graphene field-effect transistor devices: A review Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 853, 127 142 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.023
  145. 145
    Lu, C. H.; Yang, H. H.; Zhu, C. L.; Chen, X.; Chen, G. N. A Graphene Platform for Sensing Biomolecules Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4785 4787 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200901479
  146. 146
    Bonanni, A.; Pumera, M. Graphene Platform for Hairpin-DNA Based Impedimetric Genosensing ACS Nano 2011, 5, 2356 2361 DOI: 10.1021/nn200091p
  147. 147
    Loo, A. H.; Bonanni, A.; Pumera, M. An Insight into the Hybridization Mechanism of Hairpin DNA Physically Immobilized on Chemically Modified Graphenes Analyst 2013, 138, 467 471 DOI: 10.1039/C2AN36199J
  148. 148
    Giovanni, M.; Bonanni, A.; Pumera, M. Detection of DNA Hybridization on Chemically Modified Graphene Platforms Analyst 2012, 137, 580 583 DOI: 10.1039/C1AN15910K
  149. 149
    Loo, A. H.; Bonanni, A.; Ambrosi, A.; Poh, H. L.; Pumera, M. Impedimetric Immunoglobulin G Immunosensor Based on Chemically Modified Graphenes Nanoscale 2012, 4, 921 925 DOI: 10.1039/C2NR11492E
  150. 150
    Bonanni, A.; Chua, C. K.; Zhao, G.; Sofer, Z.; Pumera, M. Inherently Electroactive Graphene Oxide Nanoplatelets As Labels for Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Detection ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8546 8551 DOI: 10.1021/nn301359y
  151. 151
    Goedert, M.; Spillantini, M. G. A Century of Alzheimer’s Disease Science 2006, 314, 777 781 DOI: 10.1126/science.1132814
  152. 152
    Li, Q.; Liu, L.; Zhang, S.; Xu, M.; Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Besenbacher, F.; Dong, M. Modulating Aβ33–42 Peptide Assembly by Graphene Oxide Chem. - Eur. J. 2014, 20, 7236 7240 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201402022
  153. 153
    Mahmoudi, M.; Akhavan, O.; Ghavami, M.; Rezaee, F.; Ghiasi, S. M. A. Graphene Oxide Strongly Inhibits Amyloid Beta Fibrillation Nanoscale 2012, 4, 7322 7325 DOI: 10.1039/c2nr31657a
  154. 154
    Wang, J.; Cao, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, L.; Dong, M. Size Effect of Graphene Oxide on Modulating Amyloid Peptide Assembly Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 9632 9637 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201500577
  155. 155
    Wahid, M. H.; Stroeher, U. H.; Eroglu, E.; Chen, X.; Vimalanathan, K.; Raston, C. L.; Boulos, R. A. Aqueous Based Synthesis of Antimicrobial-Decorated Graphene J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 443, 88 96 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.043
  156. 156
    Zhou, L.; Jiang, H.; Wei, S.; Ge, X.; Zhou, J.; Shen, J. High-Efficiency Loading of Hypocrellin B on Graphene Oxide for Photodynamic Therapy Carbon 2012, 50, 5594 5604 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.08.013
  157. 157
    Chowdhury, S. M.; Surhland, C.; Sanchez, Z.; Chaudhary, P.; Kumar, M. A. S.; Lee, S.; Peña, L. A.; Waring, M.; Sitharaman, B.; Naidu, M. Graphene Nanoribbons as a Drug Delivery Agent for Lucanthone Mediated Therapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme Nanomedicine 2015, 11, 109 118 DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2014.08.001
  158. 158
    Rahmanian, N.; Hamishehkar, H.; Dolatabadid, J. E. N.; Arsalani, N. Nano Graphene Oxide: A Novel Carrier for Oral Delivery of Flavonoids Colloids Surf., B 2014, 123, 331 338 DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.09.036
  159. 159
    Liu, Z.; Robinson, J. T.; Sun, X.; Dai, H. PEGylated Nanographene Oxide for Delivery of Water-Insoluble Cancer Drugs J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10876 10877 DOI: 10.1021/ja803688x
  160. 160
    Georgakilas, V.; Kouloumpis, A.; Gournis, D.; Bourlinos, A.; Trapalis, C.; Zboril, R. Tuning the Dispersibility of Carbon Nanostructures from Organophilic to Hydrophilic: Towards the Preparation of New Multipurpose Carbon-Based Hybrids Chem. - Eur. J. 2013, 19, 12884 12891 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201301200
  161. 161
    Balcioglu, M.; Rana, M.; Yigit, M. V. Doxorubicin Loading on Graphene Oxide, Iron Oxide and Gold Nanoparticle Hybrid J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 6187 6193 DOI: 10.1039/c3tb20992j
  162. 162
    Koninti, R. K.; Sengupta, A.; Gavvala, K.; Ballav, N.; Hazra, P. Loading of an Anti-Cancer Drug onto Graphene Oxide and Subsequent Release to DNA/RNA: A Direct Optical Detection Nanoscale 2014, 6, 2937 2944 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr06081k
  163. 163
    Chia, J. S. Y.; Tan, M. T. T.; Khiew, P. S.; Chin, J. K.; Siong, C. W. A Bio-Electrochemical Sensing Platform for Glucose Based on Irreversible, Non-Covalent pi–pi Functionalization of Graphene Produced via a Novel, Green Synthesis Method Sens. Actuators, B 2015, 210, 558 565 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.01.023
  164. 164
    Kong, N.; Liua, J.; Kong, Q.; Wang, R.; Barrow, C. J.; Yang, W. Graphene Modified Gold Electrode via Stacking Interaction for Analysis of Cu2+ and Pb2+ Sens. Actuators, B 2013, 178, 426 433 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.01.009
  165. 165
    Shen, X.; Liu, Y.; Pang, Y.; Yao, W. Conjugation of Graphene on Au Surface by π–π Interaction and Click Chemistry Electrochem. Commun. 2013, 30, 13 16 DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2013.01.025
  166. 166
    Zhang, S.; Tang, S.; Lei, J.; Dong, H.; Ju, H. Functionalization of Graphene Nanoribbons with Porphyrin for Electrocatalysis and Amperometric Biosensing J. Electroanal. Chem. 2011, 656, 285 288 DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.10.005
  167. 167
    Srinivasan, S.; Je, S. H.; Back, S.; Barin, G.; Buyukcakir, O.; Guliyev, R.; Jung, Y.; Coskun, A. Ordered Supramolecular Gels Based on Graphene Oxide and Tetracationic Cyclophanes Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2725 2729 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201304334
  168. 168
    Georgakilas, V.; Perman, J. A.; Tucek, J.; Zboril, R. Broad Family of Carbon Nanoallotropes – Classification, Chemistry and Advanced Architecture of Fullerene, Nanotube, Graphene and their Relatives Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 4744 4822 DOI: 10.1021/cr500304f
  169. 169
    Shao, Q.; Tang, J.; Lin, Y.; Li, J.; Qin, F.; Yuan, J.; Qin, L. C. Carbon Nanotube Spaced Graphene Aerogels with Enhanced Capacitance in Aqueous and Ionic Liquid Electrolytes J. Power Sources 2015, 278, 751 759 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.052
  170. 170
    Georgakilas, V.; Demeslis, A.; Ntararas, E.; Kouloumpis, A.; Dimos, K.; Gournis, D.; Kocman, M.; Otyepka, M.; Zboril, R. Hydrophilic Nanotube Supported Graphene-Water Dispersible Carbon Superstructure with Excellent Conductivity Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 1481 1487 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201403801
  171. 171
    Tang, C.; Long, G.; Hu, X.; Wong, K.; Lau, W. M.; Fan, M.; Mei, J.; Xu, T.; Wang, B.; Huid, D. Conductive Polymer Nanocomposites with Hierarchical Multi-Scale Structures via Self-Assembly of Carbon-Nanotubes on Graphene on Polymer-microspheres Nanoscale 2014, 6, 7877 7888 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr06056j
  172. 172
    Li, G.; Shrotriya, V.; Huang, J. S.; Yao, Y.; Moriarty, T.; Emery, K.; Yang, Y. High-Efficiency Solution Processable Polymer Photovoltaic Cells by Self-Organization of Polymer Blends Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 864 868 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1500
  173. 173
    Kim, J. Y.; Lee, K.; Coates, N. E.; Moses, D.; Nguyen, T. Q.; Dante, M.; Heeger, A. J. Efficient Tandem Polymer Solar Cells Fabricated by All-Solution Processing Science 2007, 317, 222 225 DOI: 10.1126/science.1141711
  174. 174
    Guenes, S.; Neugebauer, H.; Sariciftci, N. S. Conjugated Polymer-Based Organic Solar Cells Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1324 1338 DOI: 10.1021/cr050149z
  175. 175
    Kim, Y.; Cook, S.; Tuladhar, S. M.; Choulis, S. A.; Nelson, J.; Durrant, R. J.; Bradley, D. D. C.; Giles, M.; Mcculloch, I.; Ha, C. S. A Strong Regioregularity Effect in Self-Organizing Conjugated Polymer Films and High-Efficiency Polythiophene: Fullerene Solar Cells Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 197 203 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1574
  176. 176
    Qu, S.; Li, M.; Xie, L.; Huang, X.; Yang, J.; Wang, N.; Yang, S. Noncovalent Functionalization of Graphene Attaching [6,6]-Phenyl-C61-butyric Acid Methyl Ester (PCBM) and Application as Electron Extraction Layer of Polymer Solar Cells ACS Nano 2013, 7, 4070 4081 DOI: 10.1021/nn4001963
  177. 177
    Gan, T.; Hu, C.; Sun, Z.; Hu, S. Facile Synthesis of Water-Soluble Fullerene–Graphene Oxide Composites for Electrodeposition of Phosphotungstic Acid-Based Electrocatalysts Electrochim. Acta 2013, 111, 738 745 DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.059
  178. 178
    Ba, H.; Podila, S.; Liu, Y.; Mua, X.; Nhuta, J. M.; Papaefthimiou, V.; Zafeiratos, S.; Granger, P.; Huu, C. P. Nanodiamond Decorated Few-Layer Graphene Composite as Anefficient Metal-Free Dehydrogenation Catalyst for Styrene Production Catal. Today 2015, 249, 167 175 DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.10.029
  179. 179
    Pastor, I. R.; Fernandez, G. R.; Rizo, H. V.; Terrones, M.; Gullon, I. M. Towards the Understanding of the Graphene Oxide Structure: How to Control the Formation of Humic- and Fulvic-Like Oxidized Debris Carbon 2015, 84, 299 309 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.027
  180. 180
    Rourke, J. P.; Pandey, P. A.; Moore, J. J.; Bates, M.; Kinloch, I. A.; Young, R. J.; Wilson, N. R. The Real Graphene Oxide Revealed: Stripping the Oxidative Debris from the Graphene Like Sheets Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 3173 3177 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201007520
  181. 181
    Thomas, H. R.; Valles, C.; Young, R. J.; Kinloch, I. A.; Wilson, N. R.; Rourke, J. P. Identifying the Fluorescence of Graphene Oxide J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 338 342 DOI: 10.1039/C2TC00234E
  182. 182
    Bonanni, A.; Ambrosi, A.; Chua, C. K.; Pumera, M. Oxidation Debris in Graphene Oxide Is Responsible for Its Inherent Electroactivity ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4197 4204 DOI: 10.1021/nn404255q
  183. 183
    Coluci, V. R.; Martinez, D. S. T.; Honório, J. G.; de Faria, A. F.; Morales, D. A.; Skaf, M. S.; Alves, O. L.; Umbuzeiro, G. A. Noncovalent Interaction with Graphene Oxide: The Crucial Role of Oxidative Debris J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 2187 2193 DOI: 10.1021/jp409501g
  184. 184
    Gupta, A.; Sakthivel, T.; Seal, S. Recent Development in 2D Materials beyond Graphene Prog. Mater. Sci. 2015, 73, 44 126 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.002
  185. 185
    Wang, Q. H.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J. N.; Strano, M. S. Electronics and Optoelectronics of Two Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 699 712 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2012.193
  186. 186
    Splendiani, A.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Kim, J.; Chim, C. Y.; Galli, G.; Wang, F. Emerging Photoluminescence in Monolayer MoS2 Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1271 1275 DOI: 10.1021/nl903868w
  187. 187
    Thripuranthaka, M.; Late, D. J. Temperature Dependent Phonon Shifts in Single-Layer WS2 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 1158 1163 DOI: 10.1021/am404847d
  188. 188
    Miremadi, B. K.; Morrison, S. R. High Activity Catalyst from Exfoliated MoS2 J. Catal. 1987, 103, 334 345 DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(87)90125-4
  189. 189
    Novoselov, K. S.; Jiang, D.; Schedin, F.; Booth, T. J.; Khotkevich, V. V.; Morozov, S. V.; Geim, A. K. Two-Dimensional Atomic Crystals Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102, 10451 10453 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502848102
  190. 190
    Coleman, J. N.; Lotya, M.; O’Neill, A.; Bergin, S. D.; King, P. J.; Khan, U.; Young, K.; Gaucher, A.; De, S.; Smith, R. J. Two-Dimensional Nanosheets Produced by Liquid Exfoliation of Layered Materials Science 2011, 331, 568 571 DOI: 10.1126/science.1194975
  191. 191
    Song, S. H.; Kim, B. H.; Choe, D. H.; Kim, J.; Kim, D. C.; Lee, D. J.; Kim, J. M.; Chang, K. J.; Jeon, S. Bandgap Widening of Phase Quilted, 2D MoS2 by Oxidative Intercalation Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3152 3158 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201500649
  192. 192
    Zhan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Najmaei, S.; Ajayan, P. M.; Lou, J. Large-Area Vapor-Phase Growth and Characterization of MoS2 Atomic Layers on a SiO2 Substrate Small 2012, 8, 966 971 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201102654
  193. 193
    Lee, Y. H.; Zhang, X. Q.; Zhang, W. J.; Chang, M. T.; Lin, C. T.; Chang, K. D.; Yu, Y. C.; Wang, J. T. W.; Chang, C. S.; Li, L. J. Synthesis of Large-Area MoS2 Atomic Layers with Chemical Vapor Deposition Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2320 2325 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201104798
  194. 194
    Zhang, Y.; Chang, T. R.; Zhou, B.; Cui, Y. T.; Yan, H.; Liu, Z.; Schmitt, F.; Lee, J.; Moore, R.; Chen, Y. Direct Observation of the Transition from Indirect to Direct Bandgap in Atomically Thin Epitaxial MoSe2 Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 9, 111 115 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.277
  195. 195
    Liu, Z.; Song, L.; Zhao, S.; Huang, J.; Ma, L.; Zhang, J.; Lou, J.; Ajayan, P. M. Direct Growth of Graphene/Hexagonal Boron Nitride Stacked Layers Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2032 2037 DOI: 10.1021/nl200464j
  196. 196
    Yu, L.; Lee, Y. H.; Ling, X.; Santos, E. J. G.; Shin, Y. C.; Lin, Y.; Dubey, M.; Kaxiras, E.; Kong, J.; Wang, H. Graphene/MoS2 Hybrid Technology for Large-Scale Two-Dimensional Electronics Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 3055 3063 DOI: 10.1021/nl404795z
  197. 197
    Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Xie, L.; Liang, Y.; Hong, G.; Dai, H. MoS2 Nanoparticles Grown on Graphene: An Advanced Catalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7296 7299 DOI: 10.1021/ja201269b
  198. 198
    Roy, K.; Padmanabhan, M.; Goswami, S.; Sai, T. P.; Kaushal, S.; Ghosh, A. Optically Active Heterostructures of Graphene and Ultrathin MoS2 Solid State Commun. 2013, 175, 35 42 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2013.09.021
  199. 199
    Roy, K.; Padmanabhan, M.; Goswami, S.; Sai, T. P.; Ramalingam, G.; Raghavan, S.; Ghosh, A. Graphene–MoS2 Hybrid Structures for Multifunctional Photoresponsive Memory Devices Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 826 830 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.206
  200. 200
    Loan, P. T. K.; Zhang, W.; Lin, C. T.; Wei, K. H.; Li, L. J.; Chen, C. H. Graphene/MoS2 Heterostructures for Ultrasensitive Detection of DNA Hybridisation Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4838 4844 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201401084
  201. 201
    Zeng, S.; Hu, S.; Xia, J.; Anderson, T.; Dinh, X. Q.; Meng, X. M.; Coquet, P.; Yong, K. T. Graphene–MoS2 Hybrid Nanostructures Enhanced Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensors Sens. Actuators, B 2015, 207, 801 810 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.10.124
  202. 202
    Meng, J.; Song, H. D.; Li, C. Z.; Jin, Y.; Tang, L.; Liu, D.; Liao, Z. M.; Xiu, F.; Yu, D. P. Lateral Graphene p-n Junctions Formed by Graphene/MoS2 Hybrid Interface Nanoscale 2015, 7, 11611 11619 DOI: 10.1039/C5NR02552D
  203. 203
    Shiva, K.; Matte, H. S. S. R.; Rajendra, H. B.; Bhattacharyya, A. J.; Rao, C. N. R. Employing Synergistic Interactions Between Few-Layer WS2 and Reduced Graphene Oxide to Improve Lithium Storage, Cyclability and Rate Capability of Li-Ion Batteries Nano Energy 2013, 2, 787 793 DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.02.001
  204. 204
    Roy, T.; Tosun, M.; Kang, J. S.; Sachid, A. B.; Desai, S. B.; Hettick, M.; Hu, C. C.; Javey, A. Field-Effect Transistors Built from All Two-Dimensional Material Components ACS Nano 2014, 8, 6259 6264 DOI: 10.1021/nn501723y
  205. 205
    Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, G.; Zhu, H.; Guo, S.; Su, D.; Lu, G.; Sun, S. Tuning Nanoparticle Structure and Surface Strain for Catalysis Optimization J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7734 7739 DOI: 10.1021/ja5030172
  206. 206
    Liu, X.; Sui, Y. H.; Meng, C. G.; Han, Y. Tuning the Reactivity of Ru Nanoparticles by Defect Engineering of the Reduced Graphene Oxide Support RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 22230 22240 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA02900C
  207. 207
    Duan, J.; Chen, S.; Dai, S.; Qiao, S. Z. Shape Control of Mn3O4 Nanoparticles on Nitrogen-Doped Graphene for Enhanced Oxygen Reduction Activity Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2072 2078 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201302940
  208. 208
    Li, W.; Wang, F.; Feng, S.; Wang, J.; Sun, Z.; Li, B.; Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Elzatahry, A. A.; Xia, Y. Sol-Gel Design Strategy for Ultradispersed TiO2 Nanoparticles on Graphene for High-Performance Lithium Ion Batteries J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18300 18303 DOI: 10.1021/ja4100723
  209. 209
    Guo, S.; Zhang, S.; Wu, L.; Sun, S. Co/CoO Nanoparticles Assembled on Graphene for Electrochemical Reduction of Oxygen Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 11770 11773 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201206152
  210. 210
    Duy-Thach, P.; Chung, G. S. A Novel Pd Nanocube-Graphene Hybrid for Hydrogen Detection Sens. Actuators, B 2014, 199, 354 360 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.04.013
  211. 211
    Jabeen, H.; Kemp, K. C.; Chandra, V. Synthesis of Nano Zerovalent Iron Nanoparticles - Graphene Composite for the Treatment of Lead Contaminated Water J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 130, 429 435 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.022
  212. 212
    Seema, H.; Kemp, K. C.; Chandra, V.; Kim, K. S. Graphene-SnO2 Composites for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue under Sunlight Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 355705 DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/35/355705
  213. 213
    Jin, S.; Chen, M.; Dong, H.; He, B.; Lu, H.; Su, L.; Dai, W.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X. Stable Silver Nanoclusters Electrochemically Deposited on Nitrogen-Doped Graphene as Efficient Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction J. Power Sources 2015, 274, 1173 1179 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.098
  214. 214
    Hui, K. S.; Hui, K. N.; Dinh, D. A.; Tsang, C. H.; Cho, Y. R.; Zhou, W.; Hong, X.; Chun, H. H. Green Synthesis of Dimension-Controlled Silver Nanoparticle-Graphene Oxide with in Situ Ultrasonication Acta Mater. 2014, 64, 326 332 DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.045
  215. 215
    Moussa, S.; Siamaki, A. R.; Gupton, B. F.; El-Shall, M. S. Pd-Partially Reduced Graphene Oxide Catalysts (Pd/PRGO): Laser Synthesis of Pd Nanoparticles Supported on PRGO Nanosheets for Carbon-Carbon Cross Coupling Reactions ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 145 154 DOI: 10.1021/cs200497e
  216. 216
    Liu, G.; Wang, Y.; Pu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Cheng, L.; Jiao, Z. One-Step Synthesis of High Conductivity Silver Nanoparticle-Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite Films by Electron Beam Irradiation Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 349, 570 575 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.044
  217. 217
    Haider, M. S.; Badejo, A. C.; Shao, G. N.; Imran, S. M.; Abbas, N.; Chai, Y. G.; Hussain, M.; Kim, H. T. Sequential Repetitive Chemical Reduction Technique to Study Size-Property Relationships of Graphene Attached Ag Nanoparticle Solid State Sci. 2015, 44, 1 9 DOI: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2015.03.024
  218. 218
    Shi, J.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.; Su, Q.; Zhang, J.; Du, G. Sonochemical Synthesis of CuS/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites with Enhanced Absorption and Photocatalytic Performance Mater. Lett. 2014, 126, 220 223 DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.04.051
  219. 219
    Thangaraju, D.; Karthikeyan, R.; Prakash, N.; Babuc, S. M.; Hayakawa, Y. Growth and Optical Properties of Cu2ZnSnS4 Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 15031 15041 DOI: 10.1039/C5DT01542A
  220. 220
    Bera, R.; Kundu, S.; Patra, A. 2D Hybrid Nanostructure of Reduced Graphene Oxide-CdS Nanosheet for Enhanced Photocatalysis ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 13251 13259 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b03800
  221. 221
    Wang, Z.; Shi, G.; Zhang, F.; Xia, J.; Gui, R.; Yang, M.; Bi, S.; Xia, L.; Li, Y.; Xia, L. Amphoteric Surfactant Promoted Three-Dimensional Assembly of Graphene Micro/Nanoclusters to Accomodate Pt Nanoparticles for Methanol Oxidation Electrochim. Acta 2015, 160, 288 295 DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.009
  222. 222
    Atar, N.; Eren, T.; Yola, M. L.; Gerengi, H.; Wang, S. Fe@Ag Nanoparticles Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide as Ultrahigh Capacity Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Battery Ionics 2015, 21, 3185 3192 DOI: 10.1007/s11581-015-1520-1
  223. 223
    Fonsaca, J. E. S.; Elias, A. L.; Domingues, S. H.; Oliveira, M. M.; Endo, M.; Orth, E. S.; Terrones, M.; Zarbin, A. J. G. Graphene Nanoribbons Inducing Cube-Shaped Ag Nanoparticle Assemblies Carbon 2015, 93, 800 811 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.098
  224. 224
    Toth, P. S.; Velický, M.; Ramasse, Q. M.; Kepaptsoglou, D. M.; Dryfe, R. A. W. Symmetric and Asymmetric Decoration of Graphene: Bimetal-Graphene Sandwiches Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 2899 2909 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201500277
  225. 225
    Xiao, F.-X.; Miao, J.; Liu, B. Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly of CdS Quantum Dots/Graphene Nanosheets Hybrid Films for Photoelectrochemical and Photocatalytic Applications J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1559 1569 DOI: 10.1021/ja411651e
  226. 226
    Zhou, R.; Qiao, S. Z. Silver/Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Interaction and Its Effect on Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 5868 5873 DOI: 10.1021/cm502260m
  227. 227
    Kemp, K. C.; Vimlesh, C.; Muhammad, S.; Kim, K. S. Reversible CO2 Adsorption by an Activated Nitrogen Doped Graphene/Polyaniline Material Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 235703 DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/23/235703
  228. 228
    Park, S.; Hu, Y.; Hwang, J. O.; Lee, E.-S.; Casabianca, L. B.; Cai, W.; Potts, J. R.; Ha, H.-W.; Chen, S.; Oh, J. Chemical Structures of Hydrazine-Treated Graphene Oxide and Generation of Aromatic Nitrogen Doping Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 638 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1643
  229. 229
    Marquardt, D.; Beckert, F.; Pennetreau, F.; Tölle, F.; Mülhaupt, R.; Riant, O.; Hermans, S.; Barthel, J.; Janiak, C. Hybrid Materials of Platinum Nanoparticles and Thiol-Functionalized Graphene Derivatives Carbon 2014, 66, 285 294 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.002
  230. 230
    Cui, L.; Wu, J.; Ju, H. Synthesis of Bismuth-Nanoparticle-Enriched Nanoporous Carbon on Graphene for Efficient Electrochemical Analysis of Heavy-Metal Ions Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 11525 11530 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201500512
  231. 231
    Wei, W.; Wang, G.; Yang, S.; Feng, X. L.; Mullen, K. Efficient Coupling of Nanoparticles to Electrochemically Exfoliated Graphene J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5576 5581 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b02284
  232. 232
    Lee, W. C.; Kim, K.; Park, J.; Koo, J.; Jeong, H. Y.; Lee, H.; Weitz, D. A.; Zettl, A.; Takeuchi, S. Graphene-Templated Directional Growth of an Inorganic Nanowire Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 423 428 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.36
  233. 233
    Yu, S. U.; Park, B.; Cho, Y.; Hyun, S.; Kim, J. K.; Kim, K. S. Simultaneous Visualization of Graphene Grain Boundaries and Wrinkles with Structural Information by Gold Deposition ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8662 8668 DOI: 10.1021/nn503550d
  234. 234
    Duong, D. L.; Han, G. H.; Lee, S. M.; Gunes, F.; Kim, E. S.; Kim, S. T.; Kim, H.; Ta, Q. H.; So, K. P.; Yoon, S. J. Probing Graphene Grain Boundaries with Optical Microscopy Nature 2012, 490, 235 240 DOI: 10.1038/nature11562
  235. 235
    Yu, S. U.; Cho, Y.; Park, B.; Kim, N.; Youn, I. S.; Son, M.; Kim, J. K.; Choi, H. C.; Kim, K. S. Fast benchtop visualization of graphene grain boundaries using adhesive properties of defects Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 5474 5476 DOI: 10.1039/c3cc42464b
  236. 236
    Kim, D. W.; Kim, Y. H.; Jeong, H. S.; Jung, H. T. Direct Visualization of Large-Area Graphene Domains and Boundaries by Optical Birefringency Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 7, 29 34 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.198
  237. 237
    Zhang, H. M.; Yu, X. Z.; Guo, D.; Qu, B. H.; Zhang, M.; Li, Q. H.; Wang, T. H. Synthesis of Bacteria Promoted Reduced Graphene Oxide-Nickel Sulfide Networks for Advanced Supercapacitors ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 7335 7340 DOI: 10.1021/am401680m
  238. 238
    Shi, Y.; Wang, J. Z.; Chou, S. L.; Wexler, D.; Li, H. J.; Ozawa, K.; Liu, H. K.; Wu, Y. P. Hollow Structured Li3VO4 Wrapped with Graphene Nanosheets in Situ Prepared by a One-Pot Template-Free Method as an Anode for Lithium-Ion Batteries Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 4715 4720 DOI: 10.1021/nl402237u
  239. 239
    Hu, J. T.; Zheng, J. X.; Tian, L. L.; Duan, Y. D.; Lin, L. P.; Cui, S. H.; Peng, H.; Liu, T. C.; Guo, H.; Wang, X. W. A Core-Shell Nanohollow-γ-Fe2O3@Graphene Hybrid Prepared through the Kirkendall Process as a High Performance Anode Material for Lithium Ion Batteries Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 7855 7858 DOI: 10.1039/C5CC01195G
  240. 240
    Sengar, S. K.; Mehta, B. R.; Kumar, R.; Singh, V. In-Flight Gas Phase Growth of Metal/Multilayer Graphene Core Shell Nanoparticles with Controllable Sizes Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2814 DOI: 10.1038/srep02814
  241. 241
    Moon, H.; Kumar, D.; Kim, H.; Sim, C.; Chang, J. H.; Kim, J. M.; Kim, H.; Lim, D. K. Amplified Photoacoustic Performance and Enhanced Photothermal Stability of Reduced Graphene Oxide Coated Gold Nanorods for Sensitive Photo acoustic Imaging ACS Nano 2015, 9, 2711 2719 DOI: 10.1021/nn506516p
  242. 242
    Si, Y.; Samulski, E. T. Exfoliated Graphene Separated by Platinum Nanoparticles Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 6792 6797 DOI: 10.1021/cm801356a
  243. 243
    Buglione, L.; Bonanni, A.; Ambrosi, A.; Pumera, M. Gold Nanospacers Greatly Enhance the Capacitance of Electrochemically Reduced Graphene ChemPlusChem 2012, 77, 71 73 DOI: 10.1002/cplu.201100016
  244. 244
    Wu, Z.-S.; Ren, W.; Wen, L.; Gao, L.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, G.; Li, F.; Cheng, H.-M. Graphene Anchored with Co3O4 Nanoparticles as Anode of Lithium IonBatteries with Enhanced Reversible Capacity and Cyclic Performance ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3187 3194 DOI: 10.1021/nn100740x
  245. 245
    Liu, Y.; Wang, R.; Yan, X. Synergistic Effect between Ultra-Small Nickel Hydroxide Nanoparticles and Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets for the Application in High-Performance Asymmetric Supercapacitor Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11095 DOI: 10.1038/srep11095
  246. 246
    Tiwari, J. N.; Kemp, K. C.; Nath, K.; Tiwari, R. N.; Nam, H.-G.; Kim, K. S. Interconnected Pt-Nanodendrite/DNA/Reduced-Graphene-Oxide Hybrid Showing Remarkable Oxygen Reduction Activity and Stability ACS Nano 2013, 7, 9223 9231 DOI: 10.1021/nn4038404
  247. 247
    Tiwari, J. N.; Nath, K.; Kumar, S.; Tiwari, R. N.; Kemp, K. C.; Le, N. H.; Youn, D. H.; Lee, J. S.; Kim, K. S. Stable Platinum Nanoclusters on Genomic DNA-Graphene Oxide with a High Oxygen Reduction Reaction Activity Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2221 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3221
  248. 248
    Huang, Y. X.; Xie, J. F.; Zhang, X.; Xiong, L.; Yu, H. Q. Reduced Graphene Oxide Supported Palladium Nanoparticles via Photoassisted Citrate Reduction for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activities ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 15795 15801 DOI: 10.1021/am504664r
  249. 249
    Yin, H. J.; Tang, H. J.; Wang, D.; Gao, Y.; Tang, Z. Y. Facile Synthesis of Surfactant-Free Au Cluster/Graphene Hybrids for High-Performance Oxygen Reduction Reaction ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8288 8297 DOI: 10.1021/nn302984x
  250. 250
    Li, Y.; Yu, Y.; Wang, J.-G.; Song, J.; Li, Q.; Dong, M.; Liu, C.-J. CO Oxidation over Graphene Supported Palladium Catalyst Appl. Catal., B 2012, 125, 189 196 DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.023
  251. 251
    Grayfer, E. D.; Kibis, L. S.; Stadnichenko, A. I.; Vilkov, O. Y.; Boronin, A. I.; Slavinskaya, E. M.; Stonkus, O. A.; Fedorov, V. E. Ultradisperse Pt Nanoparticles Anchored on Defect Sites in Oxygen-Free Few-Layer Graphene and Their Catalytic Properties in CO Oxidation Carbon 2015, 89, 290 299 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.050
  252. 252
    Zhang, C.; Lv, W.; Yang, Q.; Liu, Y. Graphene Supported Nanoparticles of Pt–Ni for CO Oxidation Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 7795 7800 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.03.131
  253. 253
    Qu, L. T.; Liu, Y.; Baek, J. B.; Dai, L. M. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene as Efficient Metal-Free Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction in Fuel Cells ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1321 1326 DOI: 10.1021/nn901850u
  254. 254
    Yang, Z.; Yao, Z.; Li, G. F.; Fang, G. Y.; Nie, H. G.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, X. M.; Chen, X.; Huang, S. M. Sulfur-Doped Graphene as an Efficient Metal-free Cathode Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction ACS Nano 2012, 6, 205 211 DOI: 10.1021/nn203393d
  255. 255
    Zhang, C. Z.; Mahmood, N.; Yin, H.; Liu, F.; Hou, Y. L. Synthesis of Phosphorus-Doped Graphene and its Multifunctional Applications for Oxygen Reduction Reaction and Lithium Ion Batteries Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4932 4937 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201301870
  256. 256
    Wang, L.; Ambrosi, A.; Pumera, M. ″Metal-Free″ Catalytic Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Heteroatom-Doped Graphene is Caused by Trace Metal Impurities Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 13818 13821 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201309171
  257. 257
    Wang, L.; Ambrosi, A.; Pumera, M. Could Carbonaceous Impurities in Reduced Graphenes be Responsible for Some of Their Extraordinary Electrocatalytic Activities? Chem. - Asian J. 2013, 8, 1200 1204 DOI: 10.1002/asia.201300122
  258. 258
    Yang, J.; Voiry, D.; Ahn, S. J.; Kang, D.; Kim, A. Y.; Chhowalla, M.; Shin, H. S. Two-Dimensional Hybrid Nanosheets of Tungsten Disulfide and Reduced Graphene Oxide as Catalysts for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 13751 13754 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201307475
  259. 259
    Peng, S. J.; Li, L. L.; Han, X. P.; Sun, W. P.; Srinivasan, M.; Mhaisalkar, S. G.; Cheng, F. Y.; Yan, Q. Y.; Chen, J.; Ramakrishna, S. Cobalt Sulfide Nanosheet/Graphene/Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites as Flexible Electrodes for Hydrogen Evolution Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 12594 12599 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201408876
  260. 260
    He, C. Y.; Tao, J. Z. Synthesis of Nanostructured Clean Surface Molybdenum Carbides on Graphene Sheets as Efficient and Stable Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Catalysts Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 8323 8325 DOI: 10.1039/C5CC01240F
  261. 261
    Youn, D. H.; Han, S.; Kim, J. Y.; Kim, J. Y.; Park, H.; Choi, S. H.; Lee, J. S. Highly Active and Stable Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysts Based on Molybdenum Compounds on Carbon Nanotube-Graphene Hybrid Support ACS Nano 2014, 8, 5164 5173 DOI: 10.1021/nn5012144
  262. 262
    Bai, S.; Wang, C. M.; Deng, M. S.; Gong, M.; Bai, Y.; Jiang, J.; Xiong, Y. J. Surface Polarization Matters: Enhancing the Hydrogen-Evolution Reaction by Shrinking Pt Shells in Pt-Pd-Graphene Stack Structures Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 12120 12124 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201406468
  263. 263
    Yan, H. J.; Tian, C. G.; Wang, L.; Wu, A. P.; Meng, M. C.; Zhao, L.; Fu, H. G. Phosphorus-Modified Tungsten Nitride/Reduced Graphene Oxide as a High-Performance, Non-Noble-Metal Electrocatalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6325 6329 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201501419
  264. 264
    Chen, Y.; Zhu, Q. L.; Tsumori, N.; Xu, Q. Immobilizing Highly Catalytically Active Noble Metal Nanoparticles on Reduced Graphene Oxide: A Non-Noble Metal Sacrificial Approach J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 106 109 DOI: 10.1021/ja511511q
  265. 265
    Yang, J. M.; Wang, S. A.; Sun, C. L.; Ger, M. D. Synthesis of size-selected Pt Nanoparticles Supported on Sulfonated Graphene with Polyvinyl Alcohol for Methanol Oxidation in Alkaline Solutions J. Power Sources 2014, 254, 298 305 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.120
  266. 266
    Chen, Y.; Yang, J.; Yang, Y.; Peng, Z.; Li, J.; Mei, T.; Wang, J.; Hao, M.; Chen, Y.; Xiong, W. A Facile Strategy to Synthesize Three-Dimensional Pd@Pt Core-Shell Nanoflowers Supported on Graphene Nanosheets as Enhanced Nanoelectrocatalysts for Methanol Oxidation Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 10490 10493 DOI: 10.1039/C5CC01803J
  267. 267
    Metin, O.; Ho, S. F.; Alp, C.; Can, H.; Mankin, M. N.; Gultekin, M. S.; Chi, M. F.; Sun, S. H. Ni/Pd Core/Shell Nanoparticles Supported on Graphene as a Highly Active and Reusable Catalyst for Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reaction Nano Res. 2013, 6, 10 18 DOI: 10.1007/s12274-012-0276-4
  268. 268
    Putta, C.; Sharavath, V.; Sarkar, S.; Ghosh, S. Palladium Nanoparticles on Beta-Cyclodextrin Functionalised Graphene Nanosheets: A Supramolecular Based Heterogeneous Catalyst for C-C Coupling Reactions under Green Reaction Conditions RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 6652 6660 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA14323J
  269. 269
    Ren, L.; Yang, F.; Wang, C. X.; Li, Y. F.; Liu, H. L.; Tu, Z. Q.; Zhang, L. Q.; Liu, Z. C.; Gao, J. S.; Xu, C. M. Plasma Synthesis of Oxidized Graphene Foam Supporting Pd Nanoparticles as a New Catalyst for One-Pot Synthesis of Dibenzyls RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 63048 63054 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA11060A
  270. 270
    Fang, Y. X.; Wang, E. K. Electrochemical Biosensors on Platforms of Graphene Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9526 9539 DOI: 10.1039/c3cc44735a
  271. 271
    Wu, W.; Liu, Z. H.; Jauregui, L. A.; Yu, Q. K.; Pillai, R.; Cao, H. L.; Bao, J. M.; Chen, Y. P.; Pei, S. S. Wafer-Scale Synthesis of Graphene by Chemical Vapor Deposition and Its Application in Hydrogen Sensing Sens. Actuators, B 2010, 150, 296 300 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2010.06.070
  272. 272
    Li, M.; Bo, X. J.; Zhang, Y. F.; Han, C.; Guo, L. P. One-Pot Ionic Liquid-Assisted Synthesis of Highly Dispersed PtPd Nanoparticles/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites for Nonenzymatic Glucose Detection Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 56, 223 230 DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.01.030
  273. 273
    Mukherji, A.; Seger, B.; Lu, G. Q.; Wang, L. Z. Nitrogen Doped Sr2Ta2O7 Coupled with Graphene Sheets as Photocatalysts for Increased Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production ACS Nano 2011, 5, 3483 3492 DOI: 10.1021/nn102469e
  274. 274
    Li, Q.; Guo, B. D.; Yu, J. G.; Ran, J. R.; Zhang, B. H.; Yan, H. J.; Gong, J. R. Highly Efficient Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production of CdS-Cluster-Decorated Graphene Nanosheets J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10878 10884 DOI: 10.1021/ja2025454
  275. 275
    Meng, F. K.; Li, J. T.; Cushing, S. K.; Zhi, M. J.; Wu, N. Q. Solar Hydrogen Generation by Nanoscale p-n Junction of p-type Molybdenum Disulfide/n-type Nitrogen-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10286 10289 DOI: 10.1021/ja404851s
  276. 276
    Wang, Y.; Yu, J. G.; Xiao, W.; Li, Q. Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Synthesis of Graphene Based Au-TiO2 Photocatalysts for Efficient Visible-Light Hydrogen Production J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 3847 3855 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta14908k
  277. 277
    Martin, S. T.; Lee, A. T.; Hoffmann, M. R. Chemical Mechanism of Inorganic Oxidants in the Process – Increased Rates of Degradation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 2567 2573 DOI: 10.1021/es00010a017
  278. 278
    Vinayan, B. P.; Nagar, R.; Ramaprabhu, S. Solar Light Assisted Green Synthesis of Palladium Nanoparticle Decorated Nitrogen Doped Graphene for Hydrogen Storage Application J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 11192 11199 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta12016c
  279. 279
    Tuček, J.; Kemp, K. C.; Kim, K. S.; Zbořil, R. Iron-Oxide-Supported Nanocarbon in Lithium-Ion Batteries, Medical, Catalytic, and Environmental Applications ACS Nano 2014, 8, 7571 7612 DOI: 10.1021/nn501836x
  280. 280
    Kucinskis, G.; Bajars, G.; Kleperis, J. Graphene in Lithium Ion Battery Cathode Materials: A Review J. Power Sources 2013, 240, 66 79 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.160
  281. 281
    Sun, W. W.; Wang, Y. Graphene-Based Nanocomposite Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries Nanoscale 2014, 6, 11528 11552 DOI: 10.1039/C4NR02999B
  282. 282
    Yang, Q.; Liang, Q.; Liu, J.; Liang, S. Q.; Tang, S. S.; Lu, P. J.; Lu, Y. K. Ultrafine MoO2 Nanoparticles Grown on Graphene Sheets as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries Mater. Lett. 2014, 127, 32 35 DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.03.055
  283. 283
    Pan, L.; Zhu, X.-D.; Xie, X.-M.; Liu, Y.-T. Smart Hybridization of TiO2 Nanorods and Fe3O4 Nanoparticles with Pristine Graphene Nanosheets: Hierarchically Nanoengineered Ternary Heterostructures for High-Rate Lithium Storage Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 3341 3350 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201404348
  284. 284
    Kasavajjula, U.; Wang, C. S.; Appleby, A. J. Nano- and Bulk-Silicon-Based Insertion Anodes for Lithium-Ion Secondary Cells J. Power Sources 2007, 163, 1003 1039 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.084
  285. 285
    Zhu, S. M.; Zhu, C. L.; Ma, J.; Meng, Q.; Guo, Z. P.; Yu, Z. Y.; Lu, T.; Li, Y.; Zhang, D.; Lau, W. M. Controlled Fabrication of Si Nanoparticles on Graphene Sheets for Li-Ion Batteries RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 6141 6146 DOI: 10.1039/c3ra22989k
  286. 286
    Hassan, F. M.; Elsayed, A. R.; Chabot, V.; Batmaz, R.; Xiao, X. C.; Chen, Z. W. Subeutectic Growth of Single-Crystal Silicon Nanowires Grown on and Wrapped with Graphene Nanosheets: High-Performance Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Battery ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 13757 13764 DOI: 10.1021/am5032067
  287. 287
    Zhou, M.; Li, X.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Ning, J.; Xiao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Chang, Y.; Zhi, L. High-Performance Silicon Battery Anodes Enabled by Engineering Graphene Assemblies Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 6222 6228 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02697
  288. 288
    Yuan, F. W.; Tuan, H. Y. Scalable Solution-Grown High-Germanium-Nanoparticle-Loading Graphene Nanocomposites as High-Performance Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes: An Example of a Graphene-Based Platform toward Practical Full-Cell Applications Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 2172 2179 DOI: 10.1021/cm5002016
  289. 289
    Zhang, H. W.; Zhou, L.; Noonan, O.; Martin, D. J.; Whittaker, A. K.; Yu, C. Z. Tailoring the Void Size of Iron Oxide@Carbon Yolk-Shell Structure for Optimized Lithium Storage Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4337 4342 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201400178
  290. 290
    Li, Y.; Zhu, C. L.; Lu, T.; Guo, Z. P.; Zhang, D.; Ma, J.; Zhu, S. M. Simple Fabrication of a Fe2O3/Carbon Composite for Use in a High-Performance Lithium Ion Battery Carbon 2013, 52, 565 573 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.015
  291. 291
    Slater, M. D.; Kim, D.; Lee, E.; Johnson, C. S. Sodium-Ion Batteries Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 947 958 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201200691
  292. 292
    Yu, D. Y. W.; Prikhodchenko, P. V.; Mason, C. W.; Batabyal, S. K.; Gun, J.; Sladkevich, S.; Medvedev, A. G.; Lev, O. High-Capacity Antimony Sulphide Nanoparticle-Decorated Graphene Composite as Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2922 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3922
  293. 293
    Xiao, Z. B.; Yang, Z.; Wang, L.; Nie, H. G.; Zhong, M. E.; Lai, Q. Q.; Xu, X. J.; Zhang, L. J.; Huang, S. M. A Lightweight TiO2/Graphene Interlayer, Applied as a Highly Effective Polysulfide Absorbent for Fast, Long-Life Lithium-Sulfur Batteries Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2891 2898 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201405637
  294. 294
    Ryu, W. H.; Yoon, T. H.; Song, S. H.; Jeon, S.; Park, Y. J.; Kim, I. D. Bifunctional Composite Catalysts Using Co3O4 Nanofibers Immobilized on Nonoxidized Graphene Nanoflakes for High-Capacity and Long-Cycle Li-O2 Batteries Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 4190 4197 DOI: 10.1021/nl401868q
  295. 295
    Chandra, V.; Park, J.; Chun, Y.; Lee, J. W.; Hwang, I.-C.; Kim, K. S. Water Dispersible Magnetite-Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites for Arsenic Removal ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3979 3986 DOI: 10.1021/nn1008897
  296. 296
    Hu, Y.; Jensen, J. O.; Zhang, W.; Huang, Y. J.; Cleemann, L. N.; Xing, W.; Bjerrum, N. J.; Li, Q. F. Direct Synthesis of Fe3C-Functionalized Graphene by High Temperature Autoclave Pyrolysis for Oxygen Reduction ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 2099 2103 DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201402183
  297. 297
    Moussa, S. O.; Panchakarla, L. S.; Ho, M. Q.; El-Shall, M. S. Graphene-Supported, Iron-Based Nanoparticles for Catalytic Production of Liquid Hydrocarbons from Synthesis Gas: The Role of the Graphene Support in Comparison with Carbon Nanotubes ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 535 545 DOI: 10.1021/cs4010198
  298. 298
    Xu, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, H.; Zhao, Z.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Qiao, Y.; Gogotsi, Y. Self-Sensing, Ultra light, and Conductive 3D Graphene/Iron Oxide Aerogel Elastomer Deformable in a Magnetic Field ACS Nano 2015, 9, 3969 3977 DOI: 10.1021/nn507426u
  299. 299
    Chen, Y.; Wang, Y. L.; Zhang, H. B.; Li, X. F.; Gui, C. X.; Yu, Z. Z. Enhanced Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Efficiency of Polystyrene/Graphene Composites with Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Carbon 2015, 82, 67 76 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.031
  300. 300
    Yao, K.; Gong, J.; Tian, N. N.; Lin, Y. C.; Wen, X.; Jiang, Z. W.; Na, H.; Tang, T. Flammability Properties and Electromagnetic Interference Shielding of PVC/Graphene Composites Containing Fe3O4 nanoparticles RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 31910 31919 DOI: 10.1039/C5RA01046B
  301. 301
    Singh, A. P.; Mishra, M.; Hashim, D. P.; Narayanan, T. N.; Hahm, M. G.; Kumar, P.; Dwfuedi, J.; Kedawat, G.; Gupta, A.; Singh, B. P. Probing the Engineered Sandwich Network of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube-Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites for High Performance Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Applications Carbon 2015, 85, 79 88 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.065
  302. 302
    Kumar, S.; Singh, A. K.; Dasmahapatra, A. K.; Mandal, T. K.; Bandyopadhyay, D. Graphene Based Multifunctional Superbots Carbon 2015, 89, 31 40 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.012
  303. 303
    Jiang, Z.; Li, J.; Aslan, H.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Chen, M.; Huang, Y.; Froning, J. P.; Otyepka, M.; Zboril, R. A High Efficiency H2S Gas Sensor Material: Paper Like Fe2O3/graphene Nanosheets and Structural Alignment Dependency of Device Efficiency J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 6714 6717 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta15180h
  304. 304
    Wang, K.; Wan, S.; Liu, Q.; Yang, N.; Zhai, J. CdS Quantum Dot-Decorated Titania/Graphene Nanosheets Stacking Structures for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Solar Cells RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 23755 23761 DOI: 10.1039/c3ra43770a
  305. 305
    Bi, E.; Su, Y.; Chen, H.; Yang, X.; Yin, M.; Ye, F.; Li, Z.; Han, L. A Hybrid Catalyst Composed of Reduced Graphene Oxide/Cu2S Quantum Dots as a Transparent Counter Electrode for Dye Sensitized Solar Cells RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 9075 9078 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA14029J
  306. 306
    Fu, M.; Jiao, Q.; Zhao, Y. One-Step Vapor Diffusion Synthesis of Uniform CdS Quantum Dots/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites as Efficient Visible-Light Photocatalysts RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 23242 23250 DOI: 10.1039/c4ra02000f
  307. 307
    Mo, R.; Lei, Z.; Sun, K.; Rooney, D. Facile Synthesis of Anatase TiO2 Quantum- Dot/Graphene Nanosheet Composites with Enhanced Electrochemical Performance for Lithium-Ion Batteries Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2084 2088 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201304338
  308. 308
    Zeng, X.; Tu, W.; Li, J.; Bao, J.; Dai, Z. Photoelectrochemical Biosensor Using Enzyme-Catalyzed in Situ Propagation of CdS Quantum Dots on Graphene Oxide ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 16197 16203 DOI: 10.1021/am5043164
  309. 309
    Jiang, S.-D.; Tang, G.; Ma, Y.-F.; Hu, Y.; Song, L. Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene-ZnS Quantum Dots Composites with Highly Efficient Visible Light Photodegradation Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 151, 34 42 DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.11.019
  310. 310
    Xia, H.; Hong, C.; Li, B.; Zhao, B.; Lin, Z.; Zheng, M.; Savilov, S. V.; Aldoshin, S. M. Facile Synthesis of Hematite Quantum-Dot/Functionalized Graphene-Sheet Composites as Advanced Anode Materials for Asymmetric Supercapacitors Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 627 635 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201403554
  311. 311
    Chao, D.; Zhu, C.; Xia, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Liang, P.; Lin, J.; Zhang, H.; Shen, Z. X. Graphene Quantum Dots Coated VO2 Arrays for Highly Durable Electrodes for Li and Na Ion Batteries Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 565 573 DOI: 10.1021/nl504038s
  312. 312
    Yeh, T. F.; Teng, C. Y.; Chen, S. J.; Teng, H. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots as Photocatalysts for Overall Water-Splitting under Visible Light Illumination Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3297 3303 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201305299
  313. 313
    Chao, D.; Zhu, C.; Xia, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Liang, P.; Lin, J.; Zhang, H.; Shen, Z. X. Graphene Quantum Dots Coated VO2 Arrays for Highly Durable Electrodes for Li and Na Ion Batteries Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 565 573 DOI: 10.1021/nl504038s
  314. 314
    He, P.; Sun, J.; Tian, S.; Yang, S.; Ding, S.; Ding, G.; Xie, X.; Jiang, M. Processable Aqueous Dispersions of Graphene Stabilized by Graphene Quantum Dots Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 218 226 DOI: 10.1021/cm503782p
  315. 315
    Lin, Y.; Chapman, R.; Stevens, M. M. Integrative Self-Assembly of Graphene Quantum Dots and Biopolymers into a Versatile Biosensing Toolkit Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 3183 3192 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201500624
  316. 316
    Zhang, Q.; Jie, J.; Diao, S.; Shao, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, L.; Deng, W.; Hu, W.; Xia, H.; Yuan, X. Solution-Processed Graphene Quantum Dot Deep-UV Photodetectors ACS Nano 2015, 9, 1561 1570 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b00437
  317. 317
    Song, S. H.; Jang, M. H.; Chung, J.; Jin, S. H.; Kim, B. H.; Hur, S. H.; Yoo, S. H.; Cho, Y. H.; Jeon, S. W. Highly Efficient Light-Emitting Diode of Graphene Quantum Dots Fabricated from Graphite Intercalation Compounds Adv. Opt. Mater. 2014, 2, 1016 1023 DOI: 10.1002/adom.201400184
  318. 318
    Kumar, P. N.; Mandal, S.; Deepa, M.; Srivastava, A. K.; Joshi, A. G. Functionalized Graphite Platelets and Lead Sulfide Quantum Dots Enhance Solar Conversion Capability of a Titanium Dioxide/Cadmium Sulfide Assembly J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 18924 18937 DOI: 10.1021/jp5052408
  319. 319
    Jung, M. H.; Chu, M. J. Comparative Experiments of Graphene Covalently and Physically Binding CdSe Quantum Dots to Enhance the Electron Transport in Flexible Photovoltaic Devices Nanoscale 2014, 6, 9241 9249 DOI: 10.1039/C4NR02254H
  320. 320
    Guo, S.; Bao, D.; Upadhyayula, S.; Wang, W.; Guvenc, A. B.; Kyle, J. R.; Hosseinibay, H.; Bozhilov, K. N.; Vullev, V. I.; Ozkan, C. S. Photoinduced Electron Transfer Between Pyridine Coated Cadmium Selenide Quantum Dots and Single Sheet Graphene Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 5199 5211 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201203652
  321. 321
    Hirose, T.; Kutsuma, Y.; Kurita, A.; Kaneko, T.; Tamai, N. Blinking Suppression of CdTe Quantum Dots on Epitaxial Graphene and the Analysis with Marcus Electron Transfer Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 083102 DOI: 10.1063/1.4893667
  322. 322
    Liu, J.; Kumar, P.; Hu, Y.; Cheng, G. J.; Irudayaraj, J. Enhanced Multiphoton Emission from CdTe/ZnS Quantum Dots Decorated on Single-Layer Graphene J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 6331 6336 DOI: 10.1021/jp5123147
  323. 323
    Qin, J.; Wang, X.; Cao, M.; Hu, C. Germanium Quantum Dots Embedded in N-Doping Graphene Matrix with Sponge-Like Architecture for Enhanced Performance in Lithium-Ion Batteries Chem. - Eur. J. 2014, 20, 9675 9682 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201402151
  324. 324
    Sun, X.; Zhou, C.; Xie, M.; Sun, H.; Hu, T.; Lu, F.; Scott, S. M.; George, S. M.; Lian, J. Synthesis of ZnO Quantum Dot/Graphene Nanocomposites by Atomic Layer Deposition with High Lithium Storage Capacity J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 7319 7326 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA00589A
  325. 325
    Zhou, X.; Shi, J.; Liu, Y.; Su, Q.; Zhang, J.; Du, G. Microwave Irradiation Synthesis of Co3O4 Quantum Dots/Graphene Composite as Anode Materials for Li-Ion Battery Electrochim. Acta 2014, 143, 175 179 DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.023
  326. 326
    Zhao, S.; Xie, D.; Yu, X.; Su, Q.; Zhang, J.; Du, G. Facile Synthesis of Fe3O4@C Quantum Dots/Graphene Nanocomposite with Enhanced Lithium-Storage Performance Mater. Lett. 2015, 142, 287 290 DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.12.051
  327. 327
    Wei, W.; Yang, S.; Zhou, H.; Lieberwirth, I.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K. 3D Graphene Foams Cross-linked with Pre-encapsulated Fe3O4 Nanospheres for Enhanced Lithium Storage Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2909 2914 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201300445
  328. 328
    Tayyebi, A.; Tavakoli, M. M.; Outokesh, M.; Shafiekhani, A.; Simchi, A. Supercritical Synthesis and Characterization of Graphene-PbS Quantum Dots Composite with Enhanced Photovoltaic Properties Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 7382 7392 DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b00008
  329. 329
    Gao, H.; Shangguan, W.; Hu, G.; Zhu, K. Preparation and Photocatalytic Performance of Transparent Titania Film from Monolayer Titania Quantum Dots Appl. Catal., B 2016, 180, 416 423 DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.06.049
  330. 330
    Cao, S.; Chen, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Yu, W.; Liang, B.; Tsang, Y. MnOx Quantum Dots Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide/TiO2 Nanohybrids for Enhanced Activity by a UV Pre-Catalytic Microwave Method Appl. Catal., B 2015, 176–177, 500 512 DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.041
  331. 331
    Kaur, P.; Shin, M. S.; Sharma, N.; Kaur, N.; Joshi, A.; Chae, S. R.; Park, J. S.; Kang, M. S.; Sekhon, S. S. Non-Covalent Functionalization of Graphene with Poly(diallyl dimethylammonium) Chloride: Effect of a Non-Ionic Surfactant Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 1541 1547 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.068
  332. 332
    Tiwari, J. N.; Tiwari, R. N.; Kim, K. S. Zero-Dimensional, One-Dimensional, Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Nanostructured Materials for Advanced Electrochemical Energy Devices Prog. Mater. Sci. 2012, 57, 724 803 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.08.003
  333. 333
    Tiwari, J. N.; Tiwari, R. N.; Singh, G.; Kim, K. S. Recent Progress in the Development of Anode and Cathode Catalysts for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells Nano Energy 2013, 2, 553 578 DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.06.009
  334. 334
    Tiwari, J. N.; Tiwari, R. N.; Chang, Y.-M.; Lin, K.-L. A Promising Approach to the Synthesis of 3D Nanoporous Graphitic Carbon as a Unique Electrocatalyst Support for Methanol Oxidation ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 460 466 DOI: 10.1002/cssc.200900223
  335. 335
    Tiwari, J. N.; Tiwari, R. N.; Singh, G.; Lin, K.-L. Direct Synthesis of Vertically Interconnected 3-D Graphitic Nanosheets on Hemispherical Carbon Particles by Microwave Plasma CVD Plasmonics 2011, 6, 67 73 DOI: 10.1007/s11468-010-9170-7
  336. 336
    Dubey, P.; Kumar, A.; Prakash, R. Non-Covalent Functionalization of Graphene Oxide by Polyindole and Subsequent Incorporation of Ag Nanoparticles for Electrochemical Applications Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 355, 262 267 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.079
  337. 337
    Campbell, P. G.; Merrill, M. D.; Wood, B. C.; Montalvo, E.; Worsley, M. A.; Baumann, T. F.; Biener, J. Battery/Supercapacitor Hybrid via Non-Covalent Functionalization of Graphene Macro-Assemblies J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 17764 17770 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA03605K
  338. 338
    Kong, D.; He, H.; Song, Q.; Wang, B.; Lv, W.; Yang, Q.-H.; Zhi, L. Rational Design of MoS2@Graphene Nanocables: Towards High Performance Electrode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 3320 3325 DOI: 10.1039/C4EE02211D
  339. 339
    Yang, S.; Cao, C.; Huang, P.; Peng, L.; Sun, Y.; Wei, F.; Song, W. Sandwich-Like Porous TiO2/Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8701 8705 DOI: 10.1039/C5TA01744K
  340. 340
    Ali, G.; Oh, S. H.; Kim, S. Y.; Kim, J. Y.; Cho, B. W.; Chung, K. Y. An Open-Framework Iron Fluoride and Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite as a High-Capacity Cathode Material for Na-Ion Batteries J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 10258 10266 DOI: 10.1039/C5TA00643K
  341. 341
    David, L.; Bhandavat, R.; Singh, G. MoS2/Graphene Composite Paper for Sodium-Ion Battery Electrodes ACS Nano 2014, 8, 1759 1770 DOI: 10.1021/nn406156b
  342. 342
    Hu, C.; Zheng, G.; Zhao, F.; Shao, H.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, N.; Jiang, L.; Qu, L. A Powerful Approach to Functional Graphene Hybrids for High Performance Energy-Related Applications Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 3699 3708 DOI: 10.1039/C4EE01876A
  343. 343
    Ren, X.; Hu, Z.; Hu, H.; Qiang, R.; Li, L.; Li, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, H. Noncovalently-Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets by Water-Soluble Methyl Green for Supercapacitor Application Mater. Res. Bull. 2015, 70, 215 221 DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.04.045
  344. 344
    Jung, S. M.; Mafra, D. L.; Lin, C.-T.; Jung, H. Y.; Kong, J. Controlled Porous Structures of Graphene Aerogels and Their Effect on Supercapacitor Performance Nanoscale 2015, 7, 4386 4393 DOI: 10.1039/C4NR07564A
  345. 345
    Jana, M.; Saha, S.; Khanra, P.; Samanta, P.; Koo, H.; Murmu, N. C.; Kuila, T. Non-Covalent Functionalization of Reduced Graphene Oxide Using Sulfanilic Acid Azocromotrop and Its Application as a Supercapacitor Electrode Material J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 7323 7331 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA07009G
  346. 346
    Hsu, W.-T.; Tsai, Z.-S.; Chen, L.-C.; Chen, G.-Y.; Lin, C.-C.; Chen, M.-H.; Song, J.-M.; Lin, C.-H. Passivation Ability of Graphene Oxide Demonstrated by Two-Different-Metal Solar Cells Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 696 DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-696
  347. 347
    Kim, K. S.; Zhao, Y.; Jang, H.; Lee, S. Y.; Kim, J. M.; Kim, K. S.; Ahn, J.-H.; Kim, P.; Choi, J.-Y.; Hong, B. H. Large-Scale Pattern Growth of Graphene Films for Stretchable Transparent Electrodes Nature 2009, 457, 706 710 DOI: 10.1038/nature07719
  348. 348
    Yin, Z.; Zhu, J.; He, Q.; Cao, X.; Tan, C.; Chen, H.; Yan, Q.; Zhang, H. Graphene-Based Materials for Solar Cell Applications Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 1300574 DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201300574
  349. 349
    Liu, J.; Xue, Y.; Dai, L. Sulfated Graphene Oxide as a Hole-Extraction Layer in High-Performance Polymer Solar Cells J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 1928 1933 DOI: 10.1021/jz300723h
  350. 350
    Shi, E.; Li, H.; Yang, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Li, P.; Shang, Y.; Wu, S.; Li, X.; Wei, J. Colloidal Antireflection Coating Improves Graphene-Silicon Solar Cells Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1776 1781
  351. 351
    Wang, J. T.-W.; Ball, J. M.; Barea, E. M.; Abate, A.; Alexander-Webber, J. A.; Huang, J.; Saliba, M.; Mora-Sero, I.; Bisquert, J.; Snaith, H. J. Low-Temperature Processed Electron Collection Layers of Graphene/TiO2 Nanocomposites in Thin Film Perovskite Solar Cells Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 724 730 DOI: 10.1021/nl403997a
  352. 352
    Kim, H.; Mattevi, C.; Kim, H. J.; Mittal, A.; Mkhoyan, K. A.; Riman, R. E.; Chhowalla, M. Optoelectronic Properties of Graphene Thin Films Deposited by a Langmuir-Blodgett Assembly Nanoscale 2013, 5, 12365 12374 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr02907g
  353. 353
    Supur, M.; Ohkubo, K.; Fukuzumi, S. Photoinduced Charge Separation in Ordered Self-Assemblies of Perylenediimide-Graphene Oxide Hybrid Layers Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 13359 13361 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC05694A
  354. 354
    Dehsari, H. S.; Shalamzari, E. K.; Gavgani, J. N.; Taromi, F. A.; Ghanbary, S. Efficient Preparation of Ultralarge Graphene Oxide Using a PEDOT:PSS/GO Composite Layer as Hole Transport Layer in Polymer-Based Optoelectronic Devices RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 55067 55076 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA09474C
  355. 355
    Kymakis, E.; Savva, K.; Stylianakis, M. M.; Fotakis, C.; Stratakis, E. Flexible Organic Photovoltaic Cells with In Situ Nonthermal Photoreduction of Spin-Coated Graphene Oxide Electrodes Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 2742 2749 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201202713
  356. 356
    Oregan, B.; Gratzel, M. A Low-Cost, High-Efficiency Solar Cell Based on Dye-Sensitized Colloidal TiO2 Films Nature 1991, 353, 737 740 DOI: 10.1038/353737a0
  357. 357
    Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L.; Kloo, L.; Pettersson, H. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6595 6663 DOI: 10.1021/cr900356p
  358. 358
    Cheng, G.; Akhtar, M. S.; Yang, O. B.; Stadler, F. J. Novel Preparation of Anatase TiO2@Reduced Graphene Oxide Hybrids for High-Performance Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 6635 6642 DOI: 10.1021/am4013374
  359. 359
    Bi, E.; Chen, H.; Yang, X.; Peng, W.; Graetzel, M.; Han, L. A Quasi Core-Shell Nitrogen-Doped Graphene/Cobalt Sulfide Conductive Catalyst for Highly Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2637 2641 DOI: 10.1039/C4EE01339E
  360. 360
    Yang, W. S.; Noh, J. H.; Jeon, N. J.; Kim, Y. C.; Ryu, S.; Seo, J.; Seok, S. I. High-Performance Photovoltaic Perovskite Layers Fabricated through Intramolecular Exchange Science 2015, 348, 1234 1237 DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa9272
  361. 361
    Jeon, N. J.; Noh, J. H.; Yang, W. S.; Kim, Y. C.; Ryu, S.; Seo, J.; Seok, S. I. Compositional Engineering of Perovskite Materials for High-Performance Solar Cells Nature 2015, 517, 476 480 DOI: 10.1038/nature14133
  362. 362
    Kong, D.; Wang, H.; Cha, J. J.; Pasta, M.; Koski, K. J.; Yao, J.; Cui, Y. Synthesis of MoS2 and MoSe2 Films with Vertically Aligned Layers Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1341 1347 DOI: 10.1021/nl400258t
  363. 363
    Wang, H.; Kong, D.; Johanes, P.; Cha, J. J.; Zheng, G.; Yan, K.; Liu, N.; Cui, Y. MoSe2 and WSe2 Nanofilms with Vertically Aligned Molecular Layers on Curved and Rough Surfaces Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3426 3433 DOI: 10.1021/nl401944f
  364. 364
    Chen, W. F.; Wang, C. H.; Sasaki, K.; Marinkovic, N.; Xu, W.; Muckerman, J. T.; Zhu, Y.; Adzic, R. R. Highly Active and Durable Nanostructured Molybdenum Carbide Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Production Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 943 951 DOI: 10.1039/c2ee23891h
  365. 365
    Vrubel, H.; Hu, X. Molybdenum Boride and Carbide Catalyze Hydrogen Evolution in both Acidic and Basic Solutions Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 12703 12706 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201207111
  366. 366
    Karunadasa, H. I.; Montalvo, E.; Sun, Y.; Majda, M.; Long, J. R.; Chang, C. J. A Molecular MoS2 Edge Site Mimic for Catalytic Hydrogen Generation Science 2012, 335, 698 702 DOI: 10.1126/science.1215868
  367. 367
    Chen, W.-F.; Sasaki, K.; Ma, C.; Frenkel, A. I.; Marinkovic, N.; Muckerman, J. T.; Zhu, Y.; Adzic, R. R. Hydrogen-Evolution Catalysts Based on Non-Noble Metal Nickel-Molybdenum Nitride Nanosheets Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6131 6135 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201200699
  368. 368
    Cao, B.; Veith, G. M.; Neuefeind, J. C.; Adzic, R. R.; Khalifah, P. G. Mixed Close-Packed Cobalt Molybdenum Nitrides as Non-noble Metal Electrocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 19186 19192 DOI: 10.1021/ja4081056
  369. 369
    Chen, W.-F.; Iyer, S.; Iyer, S.; Sasaki, K.; Wang, C.-H.; Zhu, Y.; Muckerman, J. T.; Fujita, E. Biomass-Derived Electrocatalytic Composites for Hydrogen Evolution Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1818 1826 DOI: 10.1039/c3ee40596f
  370. 370
    Xie, X.; Lin, L.; Liu, R.-Y.; Jiang, Y.-F.; Zhu, Q.; Xu, A.-W. The Synergistic Effect of Metallic Molybdenum Dioxide Nanoparticle Decorated Graphene as an Active Electrocatalyst for an Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Reaction J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8055 8061 DOI: 10.1039/C5TA00622H
  371. 371
    Chang, Y.-H.; Lin, C.-T.; Chen, T.-Y.; Hsu, C.-L.; Lee, Y.-H.; Zhang, W.; Wei, K.-H.; Li, L.-J. Highly Efficient Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Production by MoSx Grown on Graphene-Protected 3D Ni Foams Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 756 760 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201202920
  372. 372
    Levy, R. B.; Boudart, M. Platinum-Like Behavior of Tungsten Carbide in Surface Catalysis Science 1973, 181, 547 549 DOI: 10.1126/science.181.4099.547
  373. 373
    Pan, L. F.; Li, Y. H.; Yang, S.; Liu, P. F.; Yu, M. Q.; Yang, H. G. Molybdenum Carbide Stabilized on Graphene with High Electrocatalytic Activity for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 13135 13137 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC05698A
  374. 374
    Zhang, X.; Meng, F.; Mao, S.; Ding, Q.; Shearer, M. J.; Faber, M. S.; Chen, J.; Hamers, R. J.; Jin, S. Amorphous MoSxCly Electrocatalyst Supported by Vertical Graphene for Efficient Electrochemical and Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Generation Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 862 868 DOI: 10.1039/C4EE03240C
  375. 375
    Zhou, W.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, Y.; Lu, J.; Zhou, K.; Yang, L.; Tang, Z.; Li, L.; Chen, S. N-Doped Carbon-Wrapped Cobalt Nanoparticles on N-Doped Graphene Nanosheets for High-Efficiency Hydrogen Production Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 2026 2032 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00331
  376. 376
    Chowdhury, I.; Duch, M. C.; Mansukhani, N. D.; Hersam, M. C.; Bouchard, D. Colloidal Properties and Stability of Graphene Oxide Nanomaterials in the Aquatic Environment Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 6288 6296 DOI: 10.1021/es400483k
  377. 377
    Achari, A.; Datta, K. K. R.; De, M.; Dravid, V. P.; Eswaramoorthy, M. Amphiphilic Aminoclay-RGO Hybrids: ASimple Strategy to Disperse a High Concentration of RGO in Water Nanoscale 2013, 5, 5316 5320 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr01108a
  378. 378
    McCoy, T. M.; Brown, P.; Eastoe, J.; Tabor, R. F. Noncovalent Magnetic Control and Reversible Recovery of Graphene Oxide Using Iron Oxide and Magnetic Surfactants ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 2124 2133 DOI: 10.1021/am508565d
  379. 379
    Le, N. H.; Seema, H.; Kemp, K. C.; Ahmed, N.; Tiwari, J. N.; Park, S.; Kim, K. S. Solution-Processable Conductive Micro-Hydrogels of Nanoparticle/Graphene Platelets Produced by Reversible Self-Assembly and Aqueous Exfoliation J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 12900 12908 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta12735d
  380. 380
    Zubir, N. A.; Yacou, C.; Motuzas, J.; Zhang, X.; da Costa, J. C. D. Structural and Functional Investigation of Graphene Oxide-Fe3O4 Nanocomposites for the Heterogeneous Fenton-Like Reaction Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4594 DOI: 10.1038/srep04594
  381. 381
    Liu, Y.; Jiang, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, X.; Liu, T.; Yan, X.; Ding, J.; Cai, Q.; Zhang, J. Halloysite Nanotubes@Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite for Removal of Dyes from Water and as Supercapacitors J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 4264 4269 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta14594h
  382. 382
    Dong, Z.; Wang, D.; Liu, X.; Pei, X.; Chen, L.; Jin, J. Bio-Inspired Surface-Functionalization of Graphene Oxide for the Adsorption of Organic Dyes and Heavy Metal Ions with a Superhigh Capacity J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 5034 5040 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta14751g
  383. 383
    Mondal, T.; Bhowmick, A. K.; Krishnamoorti, R. Synthesis and Characterization of Bi-Functionalized Graphene and Expanded Graphite Using n-butyl Lithium and Their Use for Efficient Water Soluble Dye Adsorption J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 8144 8153 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta11212h
  384. 384
    Liang, R.; Shen, L.; Jing, F.; Qin, N.; Wu, L. Preparation of MIL-53(Fe)-Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites by a Simple Self-Assembly Strategy for Increasing Interfacial Contact: Efficient Visible-Light Photocatalysts ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 9507 9515 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b00682
  385. 385
    Qi, X.; Tan, C.; Wei, J.; Zhang, H. Synthesis of Graphene-Conjugated Polymer Nanocomposites for Electronic Device Applications Nanoscale 2013, 5, 1440 1451 DOI: 10.1039/c2nr33145d
  386. 386
    Lu, H.; Yao, Y.; Huang, W. M.; Hui, D. Noncovalently Functionalized Carbon Fiber by Grafted Self-Assembled Graphene Oxide and the Synergistic Effect on Polymeric Shape Memory Nanocomposites Composites, Part B 2014, 67, 290 295 DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.022
  387. 387
    Lu, H.; Liang, F.; Gou, J.; Leng, J.; Du, S. Synergistic Effect of Ag Nanoparticle-Decorated Graphene Oxide and Carbon Fiber on Electrical Actuation of Polymeric Shape Memory Nanocomposites Smart Mater. Struct. 2014, 23, 085034 DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/23/8/085034
  388. 388
    Love, J. C.; Estroff, L. A.; Kriebel, J. K.; Nuzzo, R. G.; Whitesides, G. M. Self-Assembled Monolayers of Thiolates on Metals as a Form of Nanotechnology Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1103 1169 DOI: 10.1021/cr0300789
  389. 389
    Schedin, F.; Geim, A. K.; Morozov, S. V.; Hill, E. W.; Blake, P.; Katsnelson, M. I.; Novoselov, K. S. Detection of Individual Gas Molecules Adsorbed on Graphene Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 652 655 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1967
  390. 390
    Wang, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Yoon, Y.; Weber, P. K.; Wang, H.; Guo, J.; Dai, H. N-Doping of Graphene Through Electrothermal Reactions with Ammonia Science 2009, 324, 768 771 DOI: 10.1126/science.1170335
  391. 391
    Joo, P.; Kim, B. J.; Jeon, E. K.; Cho, J. H.; Kim, B.-S. Optical Switching of the Dirac Point in Graphene Multilayer Field-Effect Transistors Functionalized with Spiropyran Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 10978 10980 DOI: 10.1039/c2cc35933b
  392. 392
    Li, B.; Klekachev, A. V.; Cantoro, M.; Huyghebaert, C.; Stesmans, A.; Asselberghs, I.; De Gendt, S.; De Feyter, S. Toward Tunable Doping in Graphene FETs by Molecular Self-Assembled Monolayers Nanoscale 2013, 5, 9640 9644 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr01255g
  393. 393
    Long, B.; Manning, M.; Burke, M.; Szafranek, B. N.; Visimberga, G.; Thompson, D.; Greer, J. C.; Povey, I. M.; MacHale, J.; Lejosne, G. Non-Covalent Functionalization of Graphene Using Self-Assembly of Alkane-Amines Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 717 725 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201101956
  394. 394
    Wang, H.; Bi, S.-G.; Ye, Y.-S.; Xue, Y.; Xie, X.-L.; Mai, Y.-W. An Effective Non-Covalent Grafting Approach to Functionalize Individually Dispersed Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets with High Grafting Density, Solubility and Electrical Conductivity Nanoscale 2015, 7, 3548 3557 DOI: 10.1039/C4NR06710J
  395. 395
    Kozhemyakina, N. V.; Englert, J. M.; Yang, G.; Spiecker, E.; Schmidt, C. D.; Hauke, F.; Hirsch, A. Non-Covalent Chemistry of Graphene: Electronic Communication with Dendronized Perylene Bisimides Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 5483 5487 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201003206
  396. 396
    Parvez, K.; Li, R.; Puniredd, S. R.; Hernandez, Y.; Hinkel, F.; Wang, S.; Feng, X.; Muellen, K. Electrochemically Exfoliated Graphene as Solution-Processable, Highly Conductive Electrodes for Organic Electronics ACS Nano 2013, 7, 3598 3606 DOI: 10.1021/nn400576v
  397. 397
    Woszczyna, M.; Winter, A.; Grothe, M.; Willunat, A.; Wundrack, S.; Stosch, R.; Weimann, T.; Ahlers, F.; Turchanin, A. All-Carbon Vertical van der Waals Heterostructures: Non-destructive Functionalization of Graphene for Electronic Applications Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4831 4837 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201400948
  398. 398
    Nottbohm, C. T.; Turchanin, A.; Beyer, A.; Stosch, R.; Goelzhaeuser, A. Mechanically Stacked 1-nm-Thick Carbon Nanosheets: Ultrathin Layered Materials with Tunable Optical, Chemical, and Electrical Properties Small 2011, 7, 874 883 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201001993
  399. 399
    Wang, Z. X.; Eigler, S.; Ishii, Y.; Hu, Y. C.; Papp, C.; Lytken, O.; Steinruck, H. P.; Halik, M. A Facile Approach to Synthesize an Oxo-Functionalized Graphene/Polymer Composite for Low-Voltage Operating Memory Devices J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 8595 8604 DOI: 10.1039/C5TC01861G
  400. 400
    Roth, A.; Ragoussi, M.-E.; Wibmer, L.; Katsukis, G.; de la Torre, G.; Torres, T.; Guldi, D. M. Electron-Accepting Phthalocyanine Pyrene Conjugates: Towards Liquid Phase Exfoliation of Graphite and Photoactive Nanohybrid Formation with Graphene Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 3432 3438 DOI: 10.1039/C4SC00709C
  401. 401
    Wang, Z.; Hu, G.; Liu, J.; Liu, W.; Zhang, H.; Wang, B. Coordinated Assembly of a New 3D Mesoporous Fe3O4@Cu2O-Graphene Oxide Framework as a Highly Efficient and Reusable Catalyst for the Synthesis of Quinoxalines Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 5069 5072 DOI: 10.1039/C5CC00250H
  402. 402
    Ren, R.; Li, S.; Li, J.; Ma, J.; Liu, H.; Ma, J. Enhanced Catalytic Activity of Au Nanoparticles Self-Assembled on Thiophenol Functionalized Graphene Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 2149 2156 DOI: 10.1039/C4CY01620C
  403. 403
    Pathak, P.; Gupta, S.; Grosulak, K.; Imahori, H.; Subramanian, V. Nature-Inspired Tree-Like TiO2 Architecture: A 3D Platform for the Assembly of CdS and Reduced Graphene Oxide for Photoelectrochemical Processes J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 7543 7553 DOI: 10.1021/jp512160h
  404. 404
    Padhi, D. K.; Parida, K.; Singh, S. K. Facile Fabrication Of RGO/N-GZ Mixed Oxide Nanocomposite For Efficient Hydrogen Production Under Visible Light J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 6634 6646 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00311
  405. 405
    Ullah, K.; Ye, S.; Lei, Z.; Cho, K.-Y.; Oh, W.-C. Synergistic Effect of PtSe2 and Graphene Sheets Supported by TiO2 as Cocatalysts Synthesized via Microwave Techniques for Improved Photocatalytic Activity Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 184 198 DOI: 10.1039/C4CY00886C
  406. 406
    Jiang, D.; Du, X.; Liu, Q.; Hao, N.; Qian, J.; Dai, L.; Mao, H.; Wang, K. Anchoring AgBr Nanoparticles on Nitrogen-Doped Graphene for Enhancement of Electrochemiluminescence and Radical Stability Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 4451 4454 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC09926E
  407. 407
    Joseph, K. L. V.; Lim, J.; Anthonysamy, A.; Kim, H.-I.; Choi, W.; Kim, J. K. Squaraine-Sensitized Composite of a Reduced Graphene Oxide/TiO2Photocatalyst: pi-pi Stacking as a New Method of Dye Anchoring J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 232 239 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA04313H
  408. 408
    Ma, H.; Tian, J.; Cui, L.; Liu, Y.; Bai, S.; Chen, H.; Shan, Z. Porous Activated Graphene Nanoplatelets Incorporated in TiO2 Photoanodes for High-Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8890 8895 DOI: 10.1039/C5TA00527B
  409. 409
    Xu, L.; Huang, W.-Q.; Wang, L.-L.; Tian, Z.-A.; Hu, W.; Ma, Y.; Wang, X.; Pan, A.; Huang, G.-F. Insights into Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution of g-C3N4 and Highly Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite: The Role of Oxygen Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 1612 1621 DOI: 10.1021/cm504265w
  410. 410
    Meng, F.; Cushing, S. K.; Li, J.; Hao, S.; Wu, N. Enhancement of Solar Hydrogen Generation by Synergistic Interaction of La2Ti2O7 Photocatalyst with Plasmonic Gold Nanoparticles and Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanosheets ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1949 1955 DOI: 10.1021/cs5016194
  411. 411
    Feifel, S. C.; Stieger, K. R.; Lokstein, H.; Lux, H.; Lisdat, F. High Photocurrent Generation by Photosystem I on Artificial Interfaces Composed of pi-System-Modified Graphene J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 12188 12196 DOI: 10.1039/C5TA00656B
  412. 412
    Moon, G.-H.; Kim, W.; Bokare, A. D.; Sung, N.-E.; Choi, W. Solar Production of H2O2 on Reduced Graphene Oxide-TiO2 Hybrid Photocatalysts Consisting of Earth-Abundant Elements Only Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 4023 4028 DOI: 10.1039/C4EE02757D
  413. 413
    Lee, D. H.; Song, D.; Kang, Y. S.; Park, W. I. Three-Dimensional Monolayer Graphene and TiO2 Hybrid Architectures for High-Efficiency Electrochemical Photovoltaic Cells J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 6880 6885 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00178
  414. 414
    Shah, S.; Yin, P. T.; Uehara, T. M.; Chueng, S. D.; Yang, L.; Lee, K. B. Guiding Stem Cell Differentiation into Oligodendrocytes Using Graphene-Nanofiber Hybrid Scaffolds Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3673 3680 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201400523
  415. 415
    Kim, T. H.; Shah, S.; Yang, L.; Yin, P. T.; Hossain, M. K.; Conley, B.; Choi, J. W.; Lee, K. B. Controlling Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Using Combinatorial Graphene Hybrid-Pattern Arrays ACS Nano 2015, 9, 3780 3790 DOI: 10.1021/nn5066028
  416. 416
    Park, J.; Kim, B.; Han, J.; Oh, J.; Park, S.; Ryu, S.; Jung, S.; Shin, J.; Lee, B. S.; Hong, B. H. Graphene Oxide Flakes as a Cellular Adhesive: Prevention of Reactive Oxygen Species Mediated Death of Implanted Cells for Cardiac Repair ACS Nano 2015, 9, 4987 4999 DOI: 10.1021/nn507149w
  417. 417
    Kang, S.; Park, J. B.; Lee, T. J.; Ryu, S.; Bhang, S. H.; La, W. G.; Noh, M. K.; Hong, B. H.; Kim, B. S. Covalent Conjugation of Mechanically Stiff Graphene Oxide Flakes to Three-Dimensional Collagen Scaffolds for Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Carbon 2015, 83, 162 172 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.11.029
  418. 418
    Tiwari, J. N.; Vij, V.; Kemp, K. C.; Kim, K. S. Engineered Carbon-Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Sensors for Biomolecules ACS Nano 2016, 10, 46 80 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b05690
  419. 419
    Gu, W.; Deng, X.; Gu, X.; Jia, X.; Lou, B.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Wang, E. Stabilized, Superparamagnetic Functionalized Graphene/Fe3O4@Au Nanocomposites for a Magnetically-Controlled Solid-State Electrochemiluminescence Biosensing Application Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 1876 1881 DOI: 10.1021/ac503966u
  420. 420
    Bagheri, H.; Arab, S. M.; Khoshsafar, H.; Afkhami, A. A Novel Sensor for Sensitive Determination of Atropine Based on a Co3O4-Reduced Graphene Oxide Modified Carbon Paste Electrode New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 3875 3881 DOI: 10.1039/C5NJ00133A
  421. 421
    Yoon, H. J.; Kim, T. H.; Zhang, Z.; Azizi, E.; Pham, T. M.; Paoletti, C.; Lin, J.; Ramnath, N.; Wicha, M. S.; Hayes, D. F. Sensitive Capture of Circulating Tumour Cells by Functionalized Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 735 741 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.194
  422. 422
    Lerner, M. B.; Matsunaga, F.; Han, G. H.; Hong, S. J.; Xi, J.; Crook, A.; Perez-Aguilar, J. M.; Park, Y. W.; Saven, J. G.; Liu, R. Scalable Production of Highly Sensitive Nanosensors Based on Graphene Functionalized with a Designed G Protein-Coupled Receptor Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2709 2714 DOI: 10.1021/nl5006349
  423. 423
    Singh, M.; Holzinger, M.; Tabrizian, M.; Winters, S.; Berner, N. C.; Cosnier, S.; Duesberg, G. S. Noncovalently Functionalized Monolayer Graphene for Sensitivity Enhancement of Surface Plasmon Resonance Immunosensors J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 2800 2803 DOI: 10.1021/ja511512m
  424. 424
    Hu, W.; He, G.; Zhang, H.; Wu, X.; Li, J.; Zhao, Z.; Qiao, Y.; Lu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, C. M. Polydopamine-Functionalization of Graphene Oxide to Enable Dual Signal Amplification for Sensitive Surface Plasmon Resonance Imaging Detection of Biomarker Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 4488 4493 DOI: 10.1021/ac5003905
  425. 425
    Yi, M.; Yang, S.; Peng, Z.; Liu, C.; Li, J.; Zhong, W.; Yang, R.; Tan, W. Two-Photon Graphene Oxide/Aptamer Nanosensing Conjugate for In Vitro or In Vivo Molecular Probing Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 3548 3554 DOI: 10.1021/ac5000015
  426. 426
    Castrignano, S.; Gilardi, G.; Sadeghi, S. J. Human Flavin-Containing Monooxygenase 3 on Graphene Oxide for Drug Metabolism Screening Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 2974 2980 DOI: 10.1021/ac504535y
  427. 427
    Xu, S.; Man, B.; Jiang, S.; Wang, J.; Wei, J.; Xu, S.; Liu, H.; Gao, S.; Liu, H.; Li, Z. Graphene/Cu Nanoparticle Hybrids Fabricated by Chemical Vapor Deposition As Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Substrate for Label-Free Detection of Adenosine ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 10977 10987 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b02303
  428. 428
    Datta, K. K. R.; Kozak, O.; Ranc, V.; Havrdova, M.; Bourlinos, A. B.; Safarova, K.; Hola, K.; Tomankova, K.; Zoppellaro, G.; Otyepka, M. Quaternized Carbon Dot-Modified Graphene Oxide for Selective Cell Labelling – Controlled Nucleus and Cytoplasm Imaging Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 10782 10785 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC02637C
  429. 429
    Yin, P. T.; Shah, S.; Chhowalla, M.; Lee, K.-B. Design, Synthesis, and Characterization of Graphene-Nanoparticle Hybrid Materials for Bioapplications Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 2483 2531 DOI: 10.1021/cr500537t
  430. 430
    Dikin, D. A.; Stankovich, S.; Zimney, E. J.; Piner, R. D.; Dommett, G. H. B.; Evmenenko, G.; Nguyen, S. T.; Ruoff, R. S. Preparation and Characterization of Graphene Oxide Paper Nature 2007, 448, 457 460 DOI: 10.1038/nature06016
  431. 431
    Markovic, Z. M.; Harhaji-Trajkovic, L. M.; Todorovic-Markovic, B. M.; Kepic, D. P.; Arsikin, K. M.; Jovanovic, S. P.; Pantovic, A. C.; Dramicanin, M. D.; Trajkovic, V. S. In Vitro Comparison of the Photothermal Anticancer Activity of Graphene Nanoparticles and Carbon Nanotubes Biomaterials 2011, 32, 1121 1129 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.030
  432. 432
    Bitounis, D.; Ali-Boucetta, H.; Hong, B. H.; Min, D.-H.; Kostarelos, K. Prospects and Challenges of Graphene in Biomedical Applications Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2258 2268 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201203700
  433. 433
    Feng, L.; Wu, L.; Qu, X. New Horizons for Diagnostics and Therapeutic Applications of Graphene and Graphene Oxide Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 168 186 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201203229
  434. 434
    Robinson, J. T.; Tabakman, S. M.; Liang, Y.; Wang, H.; Casalongue, H. S.; Daniel, V.; Dai, H. Ultrasmall Reduced Graphene Oxide with High Near-Infrared Absorbance for Photothermal Therapy J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6825 6831 DOI: 10.1021/ja2010175
  435. 435
    Jung, H. S.; Kong, W. H.; Sung, D. K.; Lee, M.-Y.; Beack, S. E.; Keum, D. H.; Kim, K. S.; Yun, S. H.; Hahn, S. K. Nanographene Oxide-Hyaluronic Acid Conjugate for Photothermal Ablation Therapy of Skin Cancer ACS Nano 2014, 8, 260 268 DOI: 10.1021/nn405383a
  436. 436
    Liu, J.; Jiang, X.; Xu, L.; Wang, X.; Hennink, W. E.; Zhuo, R. Novel Reduction-Responsive Cross-Linked Polyethylenimine Derivatives by Click Chemistry for Nonviral Gene Delivery Bioconjugate Chem. 2010, 21, 1827 1835 DOI: 10.1021/bc100191r
  437. 437
    Ma, N.; Li, Y.; Xu, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X. Dual Redox Responsive Assemblies Formed from Diselenide Block Copolymers J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 442 443 DOI: 10.1021/ja908124g
  438. 438
    Yang, X.; Zhao, N.; Xu, F.-J. Biocleavable Graphene Oxide Based-Nanohybrids Synthesized via ATRP for Gene/Drug Delivery Nanoscale 2014, 6, 6141 6150 DOI: 10.1039/c4nr00907j
  439. 439
    Sherlock, S. P.; Tabakman, S. M.; Xie, L.; Dai, H. Photothermally Enhanced Drug Delivery by Ultrasmall Multifunctional FeCo/Graphitic Shell Nanocrystals ACS Nano 2011, 5, 1505 1512 DOI: 10.1021/nn103415x
  440. 440
    Dembereldorj, U.; Kim, M.; Kim, S.; Ganbold, E.-O.; Lee, S. Y.; Joe, S.-W. A Spatiotemporal Anticancer Drug Release Platform of PEGylated Graphene Oxide Triggered by Glutathione InVitro and In Vivo J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 23845 23851 DOI: 10.1039/c2jm34853e
  441. 441
    Kiyomiya, K.; Matsuo, S.; Kurebe, M. Mechanism of Specific Nuclear Transport of Adriamycin: The Mode of Nuclear Translocation of Adriamycin-Proteasome Complex Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 2467 2471
  442. 442
    Ochs, M.; Carregal-Romero, S.; Rejman, J.; Braeckmans, K.; De Smedt, S. C.; Parak, W. J. Light-Addressable Capsules as Caged Compound Matrix for Controlled Triggering of Cytosolic Reactions Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 695 699 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201206696
  443. 443
    Kim, H.; Lee, D.; Kim, J.; Kim, T.-I.; Kim, W. J. Photothermally Triggered Cytosolic Drug Delivery via Endosome Disruption Using a Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide ACS Nano 2013, 7, 6735 6746 DOI: 10.1021/nn403096s
  444. 444
    Yan, L.; Chang, Y.-N.; Yin, W.; Tian, G.; Zhou, G. L.; Liu, X.; Xing, G.; Zhao, L.; Gu, Z.; Zhao, Y. On-Demand Generation of Singlet Oxygen from a Smart Graphene Complex for the Photodynamic Treatment of Cancer Cells Biomater. Sci. 2014, 2, 1412 1418 DOI: 10.1039/C4BM00143E
  445. 445
    Dong, H.; Dai, W.; Ju, H.; Lu, H.; Wang, S.; Xu, L.; Zhou, S.-F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X. Multifunctional Poly(L-lactide)-Polyethylene Glycol-Grafted Graphene Quantum Dots for Intracellular MicroRNA Imaging and Combined Specific-Gene-Targeting Agents Delivery for Improved Therapeutics ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 11015 11023 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b02803
  446. 446
    Bianco, A. Graphene: Safe or Toxic? The Two Faces of the Medal Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4986 4997 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201209099

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 1901 publications.

  1. Neda Khedri, Ali Reza Mahjoub, Amir Hossein Cheshme Khavar, Rubén Rizo, Juan M. Feliu. Selectivity-Enhanced Electroreduction of CO2 to CO at Novel Ru-Linked-GO Nanohybrids: the Role of Nanoarchitecture. Inorganic Chemistry 2024, 63 (17) , 7571-7588. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c03733
  2. Carlos Martín-Fernández, M. Merced Montero-Campillo, Ibon Alkorta. Hydrogen Bonds Are Never of an “Anti-electrostatic” Nature: A Brief Tour of a Misleading Nomenclature. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2024, 15 (15) , 4105-4110. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c00779
  3. Jianjiang He, Xiaodong Li, Ze Yang, Deyi Zhang, Tiantian Lu, Wenjing Liu, Qin Liu, Kun Wang, Changshui Huang. HsGDY 3D Framework-Encapsulated Cu2O Quantum Dots for High-Efficiency Energy Storage. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (14) , 18008-18018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c16588
  4. Andrew T. Krasley, Eugene Li, Jesus M. Galeana, Chandima Bulumulla, Abraham G. Beyene, Gozde S. Demirer. Carbon Nanomaterial Fluorescent Probes and Their Biological Applications. Chemical Reviews 2024, 124 (6) , 3085-3185. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00581
  5. Yohei Ishida. Atomic-Scale Imaging of Clay Mineral Nanosheets and Their Supramolecular Complexes through Electron Microscopy: A Supramolecular Chemist’s Perspective. Langmuir 2024, 40 (12) , 6065-6076. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c03779
  6. Recep Isci, Koray Bahadir Donmez, Nilgun Karatepe, Turan Ozturk. High-Performance Thienothiophene and Single Wall Carbon Nanotube-Based Supercapacitor as a Free-Standing and Flexible Hybrid Energy Storage Material. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2024, 7 (4) , 1488-1494. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.3c02737
  7. Nyssa S. S. Capman, V. R. Saran Kumar Chaganti, Laura E. Simms, Christopher J. Hogan, Jr., Steven J. Koester. Using Machine Learning to Overcome Interfering Oxygen Effects in a Graphene Volatile Organic Compound Sensor. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (6) , 7554-7564. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c16157
  8. Tom Kasputis, Yawen He, Qiaoqiao Ci, Juhong Chen. On-Site Fluorescent Detection of Sepsis-Inducing Bacteria using a Graphene-Oxide CRISPR-Cas12a (GO-CRISPR) System. Analytical Chemistry 2024, 96 (6) , 2676-2683. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c05459
  9. Yong Li, Jianyun Cao, Guoliang Chen, Lijun He, Xincheng Du, Jiyang Xie, Yaming Wang, Wanbiao Hu. Scalable Production of Highly Conductive 2D NbSe2 Monolayers with Superior Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Performance. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (5) , 6250-6260. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c15817
  10. Zheng Li, Zhen Xu, Chao Gao. Selective Proximate Antarafacial Distribution of Oxidized Functional Groups on Graphene Oxide. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2024, 128 (3) , 1323-1331. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c06315
  11. K.A. Shiral Fernando, Rajendr Thakuri, Amanda L. Barry Schroeder, Oscar N. Ruiz. Chemical Method for Recovery and Regeneration of Graphene Oxide. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2024, 7 (1) , 315-324. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.3c00911
  12. Syrine Affès, Akrivi-Maria Stamatelou, Xavier Fontrodona, Ahlem Kabadou, Clara Viñas, Francesc Teixidor, Isabel Romero. Enhancing Photoredox Catalysis in Aqueous Environments: Ruthenium Aqua Complex Derivatization of Graphene Oxide and Graphite Rods for Efficient Visible-Light-Driven Hybrid Catalysts. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (1) , 507-519. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c13156
  13. Priya Mandal, Sajal K. Ghosh. Graphene-Based Nanomaterials and Their Interactions with Lipid Membranes. Langmuir 2023, 39 (51) , 18713-18729. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02805
  14. Bei Ran, Lei Ran, Zuokai Wang, Jinfeng Liao, Dandan Li, Keda Chen, Wenlin Cai, Jungang Hou, Xiaojun Peng. Photocatalytic Antimicrobials: Principles, Design Strategies, and Applications. Chemical Reviews 2023, 123 (22) , 12371-12430. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00326
  15. Shi-Jie Yuan, Jing-Jing Wang, Bin Dong, Xiao-Hu Dai. Biomass-Derived Carbonaceous Materials with Graphene/Graphene-Like Structures: Definition, Classification, and Environmental Applications. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (45) , 17169-17177. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c04203
  16. Wenyuan Hu, Hongbo Li, Guoqing Zhong, Dingming Yang, Qiying Jiang, Huan Zhang, Qiulin Deng. Sensitive Detection of Trace Vitamin C via Enzyme-like Catalysis of S Defect-Rich Ultrathin 2D MoS2: Comprehensive Innovative Experiments on Two-Dimensional Materials for Undergraduates. Journal of Chemical Education 2023, 100 (10) , 4025-4030. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00465
  17. Osama R. M. Metawea, Miyuki Nara, Takeharu Murakami, Hirotaka Okabe, Naoki Matsuda, Satoshi Wada, Katsushi Fujii, Yoshihiro Ito, Masuki Kawamoto. Aqueous Suspensions of Carbon Nanomaterials with Platinum Nanoparticles for Solution-Processed Hydrogen-Producing Electrocatalysts. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2023, 6 (17) , 15521-15529. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c02190
  18. Cheng Xu, Xiang Yu, Yang Liu, Xiongzhi Zhang, Simin Liu. Versatile Graphene Oxide Hybrid Supramolecular Hydrogel Driven by Host–Guest Interaction Showing Excellent Mechanical and Sensing Properties and Photothermal Responsiveness. ACS Applied Polymer Materials 2023, 5 (9) , 7375-7389. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.3c01281
  19. Duwage C. Perera, Jayendran C. Rasaiah. Computational Study of H2O Adsorption, Hydrolysis, and Water Splitting on (ZnO)3 Nanoclusters Deposited on Graphene and Graphene Oxides. ACS Omega 2023, 8 (35) , 32185-32203. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c04882
  20. Guojun Zhang, Yipin Lv, Xinru Wei, Yuan Yuan, Fangfang Wang, Jin Yong Lee, Baotao Kang. Band-Gap Behaviors of Graphyne-/Graphdiyne-Derived Chiral Nanotubes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2023, 127 (30) , 14982-14990. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c03182
  21. Neeraj Sohal, Sonali Singla, Shweta J. Malode, Soumen Basu, Banibrata Maity, Nagaraj P. Shetti. Bioresource-Based Graphene Quantum Dots and Their Applications: A Review. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2023, 6 (13) , 10925-10943. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c02185
  22. Dayong Li, Yuling Shao, Haibo Ke, Shengquan Chang, Yong Kou, Lei Xiao, Gazi Hao. Synthesis of Covalently Modified Energetic Graphene Oxide/CuO Composites with Enhanced Catalytic Performance for Thermal Decomposition of Ammonium Perchlorate. ACS Omega 2023, 8 (25) , 22876-22886. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c01865
  23. Priyadarshi Roy Chowdhury Himani Medhi Krishna G. Bhattacharyya Chaudhery Mustansar Hussain . Future of Carbon Materials in Environmental Analysis. , 195-231. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2023-1441.ch009
  24. Yujie Zhu, Quguang Li, Chunjie Wang, Yu Hao, Nailin Yang, Minjiang Chen, Jiansong Ji, Liangzhu Feng, Zhuang Liu. Rational Design of Biomaterials to Potentiate Cancer Thermal Therapy. Chemical Reviews 2023, 123 (11) , 7326-7378. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00822
  25. Shubhalaxmi Choudhury, Samarjit Pattnayak, Ugrabadi Sahoo, Pragnyashree Aparajita, Garudadhwaj Hota. S-Doped rGO-Enwrapped Magnetically Porous NiFe2O4/CuS Heterojunction: An Efficient Z-Scheme Nano-Photocatalyst for Visible-Light-Driven Tetracycline Degradation and 4-Nitrophenol Reduction. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2023, 62 (21) , 8191-8209. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c00213
  26. Jianqi Ye, Jinhua Lu, Tuotuo Ma, Dan Wen. Untangling the Effects of Doping Carbon with Diverse Heteroatoms on the Bioelectrochemistry of Glucose Oxidase. Analytical Chemistry 2023, 95 (19) , 7685-7692. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00758
  27. Alok Tripathi, José Bonilla-Cruz. Review on Healthcare Biosensing Nanomaterials. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2023, 6 (7) , 5042-5074. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c00941
  28. Lopamudra Bishwal, Subhajit Kar, Santanu Bhattacharyya. Role of Noncovalent Interactions in N,P-Functionalized Luminescent Carbon Dots for Ultrasensitive Detection of Moisture in D2O: Boosting Visible-NIR Light Sensitivity. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (12) , 15907-15916. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c01620
  29. Natalia Alzate-Carvajal, Jaewoo Park, Ilhem Bargaoui, Ranjana Rautela, Zachary J. Comeau, Lukas Scarfe, Jean-Michel Ménard, Seth B. Darling, Benoît H. Lessard, Adina Luican-Mayer. Arrays of Functionalized Graphene Chemiresistors for Selective Sensing of Volatile Organic Compounds. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2023, 5 (3) , 1514-1520. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.2c01544
  30. Lei Zhao, Giulio Rosati, Andrew Piper, Cecilia de Carvalho Castro e Silva, Liming Hu, Qiuyue Yang, Flavio Della Pelle, Ruslán R. Alvarez-Diduk, Arben Merkoçi. Laser Reduced Graphene Oxide Electrode for Pathogenic Escherichia coli Detection. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (7) , 9024-9033. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c20859
  31. Ziyi Meng, Yuxi Zou, Ningning Li, Bei Wang, Xudong Fu, Rong Zhang, Shengfei Hu, Xujin Bao, Xiao Li, Feng Zhao, Qingting Liu. Graphene Oxide-Intercalated Microbial Montmorillonite to Moderate the Dependence of Nafion-Based PEMFCs in High-Humidity Environments. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2023, 6 (3) , 1771-1780. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c03666
  32. Amir Khajavinia, Anas El-Aneed. Carbon-Based Nanoparticles and Their Surface-Modified Counterparts as MALDI Matrices. Analytical Chemistry 2023, 95 (1) , 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04537
  33. Liangzhikun Xiao, Zhongai Hu, Yuanyuan He, Long Jiao, Liwen Lv, Qing Yin, Qiaoqiao Wei, Zhimin Li, Yuying Yang. Aqueous Electrolyte Asymmetric Supercapacitors Based on the 5-Hydroxyindole Molecule Electrode and MXene with Efficient Energy Storage. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2023, 6 (1) , 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c02098
  34. Kolleboyina Jayaramulu, Soumya Mukherjee, Dulce M. Morales, Deepak P. Dubal, Ashok Kumar Nanjundan, Andreas Schneemann, Justus Masa, Stepan Kment, Wolfgang Schuhmann, Michal Otyepka, Radek Zbořil, Roland A. Fischer. Graphene-Based Metal–Organic Framework Hybrids for Applications in Catalysis, Environmental, and Energy Technologies. Chemical Reviews 2022, 122 (24) , 17241-17338. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00270
  35. Juan Casanova-Chafer, Rocio Garcia-Aboal, Pedro Atienzar, Marta Feliz, Eduard Llobet. Octahedral Molybdenum Iodide Clusters Supported on Graphene for Resistive and Optical Gas Sensing. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (51) , 57122-57132. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c15716
  36. Yucong Wang, Huabo Huang, Jian Luo, Liang Li, Juan Huang, Peng Yu, Chuanxi Xiong. Achieving Enhanced Interfacial Interaction and High Dielectric Properties in PVDF Composite Film Containing Polyaniline-Derived N-Doped Carbon. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2022, 4 (12) , 5825-5837. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.2c01011
  37. Nyssa S. S. Capman, Xue V. Zhen, Justin T. Nelson, V. R. Saran Kumar Chaganti, Raia C. Finc, Michael J. Lyden, Thomas L. Williams, Mike Freking, Gregory J. Sherwood, Philippe Bühlmann, Christopher J. Hogan, Steven J. Koester. Machine Learning-Based Rapid Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in a Graphene Electronic Nose. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (11) , 19567-19583. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c10240
  38. . Nanostructured Materials for Sustainable Energy: Design, Evaluation, and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2022-1421
  39. Jeanne N’Diaye Raunaq Bagchi Jingbo Liu Keryn Lian . Organic-Carbon Composites for Next Generation Capacitive Electrodes. , 83-115. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2022-1421.ch003
  40. Pooja Ratre, Bulbul Jain, Roshani Kumari, Suresh Thareja, Rajnarayan Tiwari, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, Irina Yu Goryacheva, Pradyumna Kumar Mishra. Bioanalytical Applications of Graphene Quantum Dots for Circulating Cell-Free Nucleic Acids: A Review. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (44) , 39586-39602. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c05414
  41. Krushnamurty Killi, Yuval Madmon, Ronen Verker, Roie Yerushalmi. Combined Atomic and Molecular Layer Deposition Surface Modification of Carbon Nanotubes for CNT–Epoxy Polymer Composites. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2022, 5 (10) , 15429-15440. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c03471
  42. Long Zhao, Farid Ahmed, Yating Zeng, Weiqing Xu, Hai Xiong. Recent Developments in G-Quadruplex Binding Ligands and Specific Beacons on Smart Fluorescent Sensor for Targeting Metal Ions and Biological Analytes. ACS Sensors 2022, 7 (10) , 2833-2856. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.2c00992
  43. Apostolos Koutsioukis, Georgios Florakis, Elias Sakellis, Vasilios Georgakilas. Stable Dispersion of Graphene in Water, Promoted by High-Yield, Scalable Exfoliation of Graphite in Natural Aqueous Extracts: The Role of Hydrophobic Organic Molecules. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2022, 10 (38) , 12552-12558. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c02326
  44. Yitayal Admassu Workie, Cheng-Yu Kuo, Juwita Herlina Riskawati, Nattinee Krathumkhet, Toyoko Imae, Masaki Ujihara, Marie Pierre Krafft. Hierarchical Composite Nanoarchitectonics with a Graphitic Core, Dendrimer and Fluorocarbon Domains, and a Poly(ethylene glycol) Shell as O2 Reservoirs for Reactive Oxygen Species Production. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (30) , 35027-35039. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c09812
  45. Lulin Hu, Yi Yang, Jingcheng Hao, Lu Xu. Dual-Driven Mechanically and Tribologically Adaptive Hydrogels Solely Constituted of Graphene Oxide and Water. Nano Letters 2022, 22 (14) , 6004-6009. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01489
  46. Chaochao Gao, Wen Yu, Minghao Du, Bingxuan Zhu, Wanbao Wu, Yihong Liang, Dong Wu, Baoyu Wang, Mi Wang, Jiaheng Zhang. Facile Synthesis of Ag/Carbon Quantum Dots/Graphene Composites for Highly Conductive Water-Based Inks. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (29) , 33694-33702. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c06298
  47. Qixuan Xiang, Boan Zhong, Huijun Tan, Rahul Navik, Zhiyuan Liu, Yaping Zhao. Improved Dispersibility of Graphene in an Aqueous Solution by Reduced Graphene Oxide Surfactant: Experimental Verification and Density Functional Theory Calculation. Langmuir 2022, 38 (27) , 8222-8231. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00552
  48. Jinwu Hu, Caihong Fang, Xiaomin Jiang, Deliang Zhang, Zhiqing Cui. Ultrathin and Porous 2D PtPdCu Nanoalloys as High-Performance Multifunctional Electrocatalysts for Various Alcohol Oxidation Reactions. Inorganic Chemistry 2022, 61 (24) , 9352-9363. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c01257
  49. Marziya Rizvi Husnu Gerengi Preeti Gupta . Functionalization of Nanomaterials: Synthesis and Characterization. , 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2022-1418.ch001
  50. Sarita Rai Mridula Guin Anindita De N. B. Singh . Functionalized Nanomaterials: Basics, Properties and Applications. , 27-66. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2022-1418.ch002
  51. Ja-Jung Koo, Zee Hwan Kim. Radical-Mediated C–C Coupling of Alcohols Induced by Plasmonic Hot Carriers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2022, 13 (16) , 3740-3747. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00798
  52. Yungen Wu, Daizong Ji, Changhao Dai, Derong Kong, Yiheng Chen, Liqian Wang, Mingquan Guo, Yunqi Liu, Dacheng Wei. Triple-Probe DNA Framework-Based Transistor for SARS-CoV-2 10-in-1 Pooled Testing. Nano Letters 2022, 22 (8) , 3307-3316. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00415
  53. Ilhem Bargaoui, Nabila Bitri, Jean-Michel Ménard. A Comparative Investigation of Chemically Reduced Graphene Oxide Thin Films Deposited via Spray Pyrolysis. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (14) , 11973-11979. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c00108
  54. Fa-Yuan Ge, Qi Yan, Shuai Liang, Xin-De Duan, He-Gen Zheng. From Hydrogen Bond to van der Waals Force: Molecular Scalpel Strategy to Exfoliate a Two-Dimensional Metal–Organic Nanosheet. Inorganic Chemistry 2022, 61 (14) , 5465-5468. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03755
  55. Xifeng Liu, Linli Li, Bipin Gaihre, Sungjo Park, Yong Li, Andre Terzic, Benjamin D. Elder, Lichun Lu. Scaffold-Free Spheroids with Two-Dimensional Heteronano-Layers (2DHNL) Enabling Stem Cell and Osteogenic Factor Codelivery for Bone Repair. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (2) , 2741-2755. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c09688
  56. Hao Wang, Mingqi Chen, Yimin Sun, Lian Xu, Fei Li, Jinsong Han. Machine Learning-Assisted Pattern Recognition of Amyloid Beta Aggregates with Fluorescent Conjugated Polymers and Graphite Oxide Electrostatic Complexes. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (6) , 2757-2763. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03623
  57. Lili Xu, Renmin Liu, Zhaofang Li, Moju Li, Min Zhao, Yingjie Li, Guiyue Hou, Aifeng Li, Hongbo Suo. Ionic Liquid Modification Optimizes the Interface between Lipase and Magnetic GO for Enhancing Biocatalysis. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2022, 61 (3) , 1277-1284. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04396
  58. Francisco Hidalgo, Alberto Rubio-Ponce, Cecilia Noguez. Cysteine Adsorption on Twisted-Bilayer Graphene. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (49) , 27314-27322. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08649
  59. Qingfang Han, Jinbo Pang, Yufen Li, Baojun Sun, Bergoi Ibarlucea, Xiaoyan Liu, Thomas Gemming, Qilin Cheng, Shu Zhang, Hong Liu, Jingang Wang, Weijia Zhou, Gianaurelio Cuniberti, Mark H. Rümmeli. Graphene Biodevices for Early Disease Diagnosis Based on Biomarker Detection. ACS Sensors 2021, 6 (11) , 3841-3881. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c01172
  60. Zhuquan Huang, Jiaqi Wang, Suwei Lu, Hun Xue, Qinghua Chen, Min-Quan Yang, Qingrong Qian. Insight into the Real Efficacy of Graphene for Enhancing Photocatalytic Efficiency: A Case Study on CVD Graphene-TiO2 Composites. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2021, 4 (9) , 8755-8764. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c00731
  61. Daniela K. Jacquelín, Federico A. Soria, Patricia A. Paredes-Olivera, Eduardo M. Patrito. Reactive Force Field-Based Molecular Dynamics Simulations on the Thermal Stability of Trimesic Acid on Graphene: Implications for the Design of Supramolecular Networks. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2021, 4 (9) , 9241-9253. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c01759
  62. Shamim Ahmed Hira, Mohammad Yusuf, Dicky Annas, Saravanan Nagappan, Sehwan Song, Sungkyun Park, Kang Hyun Park. Recent Advances on Conducting Polymer-Supported Nanocomposites for Nonenzymatic Electrochemical Sensing. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2021, 60 (37) , 13425-13437. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02043
  63. Kang-Qiang Lu, Yue-Hua Li, Zi-Rong Tang, Yi-Jun Xu. Roles of Graphene Oxide in Heterogeneous Photocatalysis. ACS Materials Au 2021, 1 (1) , 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialsau.1c00022
  64. Long Jiao, Fuquan Ma, Xiaotong Wang, Zhimin Li, Zhongai Hu, Qing Yin. Quinolinediol Molecule Electrode and MXene for Asymmetric Supercapacitors with Efficient Energy Storage. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2021, 4 (8) , 7811-7820. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c01169
  65. Yang Gang, Erik Sarnello, John Pellessier, Siyuan Fang, Manuel Suarez, Fuping Pan, Zichen Du, Peng Zhang, Lingzhe Fang, Yuzi Liu, Tao Li, Hong-Cai Zhou, Yun Hang Hu, Ying Li. One-Step Chemical Vapor Deposition Synthesis of Hierarchical Ni and N Co-Doped Carbon Nanosheet/Nanotube Hybrids for Efficient Electrochemical CO2 Reduction at Commercially Viable Current Densities. ACS Catalysis 2021, 11 (16) , 10333-10344. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c01864
  66. Muserref A Ocsoy, Sadi Yusufbeyoglu, Nilay Ildiz, Ahmet Ulgen, Ismail Ocsoy. DNA Aptamer-Conjugated Magnetic Graphene Oxide for Pathogenic Bacteria Aggregation: Selective and Enhanced Photothermal Therapy for Effective and Rapid Killing. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (31) , 20637-20643. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c02832
  67. Duan-Chao Wang, Hou-Yong Yu, Dongming Qi, Yuhang Wu, Lumin Chen, Ziheng Li. Confined Chemical Transitions for Direct Extraction of Conductive Cellulose Nanofibers with Graphitized Carbon Shell at Low Temperature and Pressure. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (30) , 11620-11630. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c04710
  68. Mawin J. Martinez Jimenez, Alba Avila, Anerise de Barros, Elvis Oswaldo Lopez, Fernando Alvarez, Antonio Riul, Jr, Jaime Andres Perez-Taborda. Polyethyleneimine-Functionalized Carbon Nanotube/Graphene Oxide Composite: A Novel Sensing Platform for Pb(II) Acetate in Aqueous Solution. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (28) , 18190-18199. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c02085
  69. Adam R. Brill, Alonit Kafri, Pranab K. Mohapatra, Ariel Ismach, Graham de Ruiter, Elad Koren. Modulating the Optoelectronic Properties of MoS2 by Highly Oriented Dipole-Generating Monolayers. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (27) , 32590-32597. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c09035
  70. Shao-Xiong Lennon Luo, Richard Y. Liu, Sungsik Lee, Timothy M. Swager. Electrocatalytic Isoxazoline–Nanocarbon Metal Complexes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (27) , 10441-10453. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c05439
  71. Takahiro Tsukamoto, Nobumitsu Hirose, Akifumi Kasamatsu, Toshiaki Matsui, Yoshiyuki Suda. Direct Growth of Patterned Ge on Insulators Using Graphene. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (25) , 14117-14121. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03567
  72. Tomokazu Umeyama, Han Xu, Tomoya Ohara, Yusuke Tsutsui, Shu Seki, Hiroshi Imahori. Photodynamic and Photoelectrochemical Properties of Few-Layered Bismuthene Film on SnO2 Electrode and Its Hybridization with C60. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (25) , 13954-13962. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03574
  73. Fuquan Ma, Zhongai Hu, Long Jiao, Xiaotong Wang, Yuanyuan He, Yuying Yang, Zhimin Li. Organic Molecule-Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide for All-Carbon Asymmetric Supercapacitor Applications. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2021, 4 (6) , 5493-5503. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c00150
  74. Tutku Beduk, Duygu Beduk, José Ilton de Oliveira Filho, Figen Zihnioglu, Candan Cicek, Ruchan Sertoz, Bilgin Arda, Tuncay Goksel, Kutsal Turhan, Khaled N. Salama, Suna Timur. Rapid Point-of-Care COVID-19 Diagnosis with a Gold-Nanoarchitecture-Assisted Laser-Scribed Graphene Biosensor. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (24) , 8585-8594. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01444
  75. Cho Rok Jin, Jee Young Kim, Da Hee Kim, Min Seo Jeon, Yoon-E Choi. In Vivo Monitoring of Intracellular Metabolite in a Microalgal Cell Using an Aptamer/Graphene Oxide Nanosheet Complex. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2021, 4 (6) , 5080-5089. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c00322
  76. Yuxin Chen, Po Hu, Zhiyun Huang, Jinyu Wang, Haiyang Song, Xi Chen, Xiao Lin, Tianmin Wu, Xiaodi Tan. Significant Enhancement of the Polarization Holographic Performance of Photopolymeric Materials by Introducing Graphene Oxide. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (23) , 27500-27512. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c07390
  77. Syed Farooq Adil, Mohammed Rafi Shaik, Fahd A. Nasr, Ali S. Alqahtani, Mohammad Z. Ahmed, Wajhul Qamar, Mufsir Kuniyil, Adibah Almutairi, Abdulrahman Alwarthan, Mohammed Rafiq H. Siddiqui, Mohammad Rafe Hatshan, Mujeeb Khan. Enhanced Apoptosis by Functionalized Highly Reduced Graphene Oxide and Gold Nanocomposites in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (23) , 15147-15155. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c01377
  78. Lin Mei, Yanmei Shi, Fengyi Cao, Xuan Liu, Xiu-Min Li, Zhenlong Xu, Zhiqiang Miao. PEGylated Phthalocyanine-Functionalized Graphene Oxide with Ultrahigh-Efficient Photothermal Performance for Triple-Mode Antibacterial Therapy. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 2021, 7 (6) , 2638-2648. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00178
  79. Daniel González-Muñoz, Ana Martín-Somer, Klara Strobl, Silvia Cabrera, Pedro J. De Pablo, Sergio Díaz-Tendero, Matías Blanco, José Alemán. Enhancing Visible-Light Photocatalysis via Endohedral Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with Organic Dyes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (21) , 24877-24886. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c04679
  80. Yaqi Cao, Junshi Zhang, Lan Wang, Mingjun Cen, Wenchao Peng, Yang Li, Fengbao Zhang, Juan Tan, Xiaobin Fan. Dual-Functionalized Covalent Triazine Framework Nanosheets as Hierarchical Nonviral Vectors for Intracellular Gene Delivery. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2021, 4 (5) , 4948-4955. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c00477
  81. Gunwoo Kim, Jeongjae Lee, Tao Liu, Clare P. Grey. Characterizing Nitrogen Sites in Nitrogen-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide: A Combined Solid-State 15N NMR, XPS, and DFT Approach. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (19) , 10558-10564. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02669
  82. Aloke Bapli, Aninda Chatterjee, Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Rabindranath Jana, Debabrata Seth. Modulation of the Protein–Ligand Interaction in the Presence of Graphene Oxide: a Detailed Spectroscopic Study. Langmuir 2021, 37 (16) , 5034-5048. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00534
  83. Ruicong Wang, Kun Lan, Runfeng Lin, Xinxin Jing, Chin-Te Hung, Xingmiao Zhang, Liangliang Liu, Yi Yang, Gang Chen, Xiaoguo Liu, Chunhai Fan, Ahmed Mohamed El-Toni, Aslam Khan, Yun Tang, Dongyuan Zhao. Precisely Controlled Vertical Alignment in Mesostructured Carbon Thin Films for Efficient Electrochemical Sensing. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (4) , 7713-7721. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c01367
  84. Andreas Tsiamis, Francisco Diaz Sanchez, Niklas Hartikainen, Michael Chung, Srinjoy Mitra, Ying Chin Lim, Huey Ling Tan, Norbert Radacsi. Graphene Wrapping of Electrospun Nanofibers for Enhanced Electrochemical Sensing. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (16) , 10568-10577. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c05823
  85. Ali Motaee, Soheila Javadian, Mahnaz Khosravian. Influence of Adsorption Energy in Graphene Production via Surfactant-Assisted Exfoliation of Graphite: A Graphene-Dispersant Design. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2021, 4 (4) , 3545-3556. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c00043
  86. Bowen Zheng, Grace X. Gu. Prediction of Graphene Oxide Functionalization Using Gradient Boosting: Implications for Material Chemical Composition Identification. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2021, 4 (3) , 3167-3174. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c00384
  87. Yanxiao Li, Zhekun Peng, Natalie J. Holl, Md. Rifat Hassan, John M. Pappas, Congjie Wei, Omid Hoseini Izadi, Yang Wang, Xiangyang Dong, Cheng Wang, Yue-Wern Huang, DongHyun Kim, Chenglin Wu. MXene–Graphene Field-Effect Transistor Sensing of Influenza Virus and SARS-CoV-2. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (10) , 6643-6653. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c05421
  88. Hyungjun Park, Dong Jun Shin, Junhua Yu. Categorization of Quantum Dots, Clusters, Nanoclusters, and Nanodots. Journal of Chemical Education 2021, 98 (3) , 703-709. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01403
  89. Ikumi Akita, Yohei Ishida, Tetsu Yonezawa. Direct Imaging of Individual Organic Molecules in Supramolecular Assembly Strongly Fixed via Multivalent Electrostatic Interactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (8) , 4917-4923. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c00738
  90. Margarita Vázquez-González, Itamar Willner. Aptamer-Functionalized Micro- and Nanocarriers for Controlled Release. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (8) , 9520-9541. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c17121
  91. Adam R. Brill, Santu Biswas, Maytal Caspary Toroker, Graham de Ruiter, Elad Koren. Dipole-Induced Raman Enhancement Using Noncovalent Azobenzene-Functionalized Self-Assembled Monolayers on Graphene Terraces. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (8) , 10271-10278. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c20454
  92. Mohit Saraf, Mohammad Tavakkoli Yaraki, Prateek, Yen Nee Tan, Raju Kumar Gupta. Insights and Perspectives Regarding Nanostructured Fluorescent Materials toward Tackling COVID-19 and Future Pandemics. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2021, 4 (2) , 911-948. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c02945
  93. Kishan Thodkar, Pierre-Andre Cazade, Frank Bergmann, Eloisa Lopez-Calle, Damien Thompson, Dieter Heindl. Self-Assembled Pyrene Stacks and Peptide Monolayers Tune the Electronic Properties of Functionalized Electrolyte-Gated Graphene Field-Effect Transistors. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (7) , 9134-9142. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c18485
  94. Andrew D. Pendergast, Christophe Renault, Jeffrey E. Dick. Correlated Optical–Electrochemical Measurements Reveal Bidirectional Current Steps for Graphene Nanoplatelet Collisions at Ultramicroelectrodes. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (5) , 2898-2906. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04409
  95. Yawen Miao, Kai Chen, Xu Zhang, Zhijun Xu, Xiaoning Yang. Water-Mediated Attractive Interaction between Negatively Charged GO Nanosheets at the Air–Water Interface. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (1) , 845-853. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07429
  96. Qun Su, Xue V. Zhen, Justin T. Nelson, Ruixue Li, Philippe Bühlmann, Gregory Sherwood, Steven J. Koester. Ultraclean Graphene Transfer Using a Sacrificial Fluoropolymer Nanolayer: Implications for Sensor and Electronic Applications. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2020, 3 (12) , 11998-12007. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c02482
  97. Yong Li, Jialin Lu, Jing Zhang, Xiaohui Zhu, Jinliang Liu, Yong Zhang. Phase-Change Nanotherapeutic Agents Based on Mesoporous Carbon for Multimodal Imaging and Tumor Therapy. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2020, 3 (12) , 8705-8713. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c01102
  98. Won Chang Lee, Seok Min Kang, Byung Chul Lee, Sang Eun Kim, Dong Wook Kim. Multifunctional Crown-5-calix[4]arene-based Phase-Transfer Catalysts for Aromatic 18F-Fluorination. Organic Letters 2020, 22 (24) , 9551-9555. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03604
  99. Piramon Hampitak, Thomas A. Jowitt, Daniel Melendrez, Maryline Fresquet, Patrick Hamilton, Maria Iliut, Kaiwen Nie, Ben Spencer, Rachel Lennon, Aravind Vijayaraghavan. A Point-of-Care Immunosensor Based on a Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Graphene Biointerface for Antibody Assay. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 (11) , 3520-3532. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c01641
  100. Kuang Liang, Ewa M. Spiesz, Dominik T. Schmieden, An-Wu Xu, Anne S. Meyer, Marie-Eve Aubin-Tam. Bioproduced Polymers Self-Assemble with Graphene Oxide into Nanocomposite Films with Enhanced Mechanical Performance. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (11) , 14731-14739. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c00913
Load more citations
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. A layer of graphene peeled away from the graphite found in a common pencil.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Model of the SiC structure in which three carbon layers of SiC are collapsed under evaporation of Si to form one graphite layer: (− – −) unit mesh of SiC (0001); (- - -) unit mesh of the graphite layer; (○) C atoms from the collapse of three carbon layers of SiC; and (●) C atoms of the monocrystalline graphite top layer. Reprinted with permission from ref 10. Copyright 1975 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Oxidation of graphene sheet to form graphene oxide.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Schematic representation of noncovalent interactions of G/GO with selected application-important species involving MoS2, aromatic polymers, proteins, core–shell nanoparticle, nanotube, quantum dot, ellipticine (drug/photoluminescence probe), DNA segment, and fullerenes (clockwise from top).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. π–π stacking face-to-face (left), slipped (middle), and C–H···π (right) type from benzyl molecules where the gray atoms represent carbon and orange represents hydrogen for benzene or other atoms for different derivatives.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Idealized π–π or C–H···π interactions from benzene, naphthalene, or pyrene molecules above and below the basal plane of graphene.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Schematic representation of both hydrogen bonds and/or π–π stacking with GO.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. Molecules of 4-n-octyl-4′-cyanobiphenyl aligned on the surface of HOPG. Reprinted with permission from ref 45. Copyright 1988 Nature Publishing Group.

    Figure 9

    Figure 9. Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) images of trimesic acid on the surface of HOPG in (a) honeycomb, (b) flower, and (c) close packing motifs. Panels (a) and (b) reprinted with permission from ref 46. Copyright 2002 Wiley-VCH. Panel (c) reprinted with permission from ref 49. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 10

    Figure 10. (a) Upright arrangement of F4-TCNA on EG/SiC and (b) parallel with the EG/Ru surface. Panel (a) reprinted with permission from ref 52. Copyright 2010 American Physical Society. Panel (b) reprinted with permission from ref 53. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 11

    Figure 11. Monolayer of PTCDA adsorbed on EG/SiC(0001). Reprinted with permission from ref 54. Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 12

    Figure 12. (a) Supramolecular chains of PTCDI and (b) an alkyl PTCDI derivative absorbed on EG/SiC. Reprinted with permission from ref 58. Copyright 2010 Wiley-VCH.

    Figure 13

    Figure 13. (a) Schematic setup used for measuring the π–π interactions between pyrene and graphite in aqueous medium by single molecule force microscopy. (b) Force curves of pyrene-modified tips desorbed from graphite substrate in aqueous medium under a retraction velocity of 500 nm/s and at room temperature. Reprinted with permission from ref 74. Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 14

    Figure 14. Aqueous dispersion of (a) rGO, (b) rGO-PDI, and (c) rGO-PyS after centrifugation. (d) G-bands of the Raman spectra of the rGO, rGO-PDI, and rGO-PyS hybrids. Reprinted with permission from ref 78. Copyright 2009 Wiley VCH.

    Figure 15

    Figure 15. AFM images and cross-section analysis of (a) rGO/PyS and (b) rGO/PDI on mica. Reprinted with permission from ref 78. Copyright 2009 Wiley VCH.

    Figure 16

    Figure 16. UV–vis absorption change of AlPcS4 (15 μm for rGO and 3 μm for GO) by the interaction with increased amount of (a) rGO and (b) GO. Reprinted with permission from ref 81. Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 17

    Figure 17. (a) PL of AlPcS4 (15 μM) in the presence of rGO with excitation at 610 nm. (b) The plot of the intensity of quenching with the concentration of rGO, GO, and SWNTs. Reprinted with permission from ref 81. Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 18

    Figure 18. (a) Structure of the tetrapyrene derivative. (b) The resulting hybrid is highly dispersible in water (1.5 mg mL–1). (c) Schematic representation of exfoliation process. (d) Absorption and (e) emission spectra of 1 and 1-G in 0.2 wt % (MeOH/H2O); λex = 340 nm. Reprinted with permission from ref 86. Copyright 2011 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 19

    Figure 19. Four pyrene derivatives with increasing number of sulfonic groups used for the study of graphite exfoliation and G stabilization. Reprinted with permission from ref 92. Copyright 2013 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 20

    Figure 20. Porphyrin derivatives with sulfonate and ammonium groups. Reprinted with permission from ref 104. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 21

    Figure 21. Schematic representation of pyridinium-functionalized porphyrin interacting with G by π stacking. Reprinted with permission from ref 105. Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 22

    Figure 22. π–π interaction of phthalocyanine TSCuPc with G (GR in the image). Reprinted with permission from ref 108. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 23

    Figure 23. UV–vis spectra of TSCuPc and the hybrid G/TSCuPc. Reprinted with permission from ref 108. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 24

    Figure 24. Time-dependent photothermal curves of G/TSCuPc and TSCuPc solutions. Reprinted with permission from ref 108. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 25

    Figure 25. PL spectra of the rGO/Rb hybrid and rGO. Reprinted with permission from ref 112. Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 26

    Figure 26. Transformation of the hydrophilic rGO to an organophilic rGO/polymer composite using an amine terminated polystyrene. Reprinted with permission from ref 121. Copyright 2010 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 27

    Figure 27. Interaction of Kevlar with graphene nanoribbons. Reprinted with permission from ref 122. Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 28

    Figure 28. (a) Synthetic procedure of adding aromatic end groups to polyethylene glycol and (b) schematic presentation of the f-PEG/rGO composite formation. Reprinted with permission from ref 123. Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 29

    Figure 29. Electrical conductivity of the PEG/rGO composites with different polymer loadings. Reprinted with permission from ref 123. Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 30

    Figure 30. Preparation of a composite material with waterborn polyurethane and surfactant covered rGO. Reprinted with permission from ref 128. Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 31

    Figure 31. Tapping mode AFM images of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) immobilized on GO at (a) small and (b) large enzyme loadings. (c) Schematic model of the GO-bound HRP. (d) Initial reaction rates of GO-bound HRP versus HRP concentration. Reprinted with permission from ref 131. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 32

    Figure 32. Deposition of tryptophane/G on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) for the determination of dopamine. Reprinted with permission from ref 136. Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 33

    Figure 33. Schematic representation of the target-induced fluorescence change of a dye labeled ssDNA/GO hybrid. FAM is the fluorescein-based fluorescent dye. Reprinted with permission from ref 145. Copyright 2009 Wiley-VCH.

    Figure 34

    Figure 34. Electrochemical behavior of GO nanoplatelets after the interaction with ssDNA modified electrodes exposed to (a) complementary, (b) one-mismatch, and (c) noncomplementary targets. Reprinted with permission from ref 150. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 35

    Figure 35. AFM images showing (a) the formation of fibrils after aggregation in a solution of Aβ33–44 peptide and (b) the absence of fibrils when in the peptide solution with GO nanoplatelets. Reprinted with permission from ref 154. Copyright 2015 Wiley VCH.

    Figure 36

    Figure 36. (a) Molecular structure of Ramisol and the hybrid with a G layer. (b) Dispersion of the hybrid in water with different ratios. Reprinted with permission from ref 155. Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 37

    Figure 37. (a) Molecular structure of hypocrellin A and B. (b) Schematic representation of the GO/HB hybrid. Reprinted with permission from ref 156. Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 38

    Figure 38. (a) Neutral and protonated forms of ellipticine. (b) Photoluminescence of E free and after its π–π interaction with GO and changes in the presence of HSA, DNA, RNA, or HSA and DNA. Reprinted with permission from ref 162. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 39

    Figure 39. Pyrene links graphene and glucose oxidase through π–π stacking. Reprinted with permission from ref 163. Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 40

    Figure 40. Pyrene interconnection between G and gold electrode. Reprinted with permission from ref 164. Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 41

    Figure 41. (a) Structure of a cyclophane with diazapyrenium units (CBDAP4+), (b) photo of CBDAP4+/GO gel, and (c) representation of the possible position of cyclophane/CBDAP between GO layers. Reprinted with permission from ref 167. Copyright 2014 Wiley-VCH.

    Figure 42

    Figure 42. Schematic representation of aerogel formation toward the rGO/SWNT hybrid. Reprinted with permission from ref 169. Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 43

    Figure 43. (a) Formation of G/MWNTs-f-OH hybrid and (b) its dispersion in water. (c) Graphene precipitate without MWNTs-f-OH following the same procedure and (d) the hybrid in ethylene glycol at high concentration. Reprinted with permission from ref 170. Copyright 2015 Wiley-VCH.

    Figure 44

    Figure 44. Schematic representation of the two possible conformations of the pyrene-PCBM/rGO hybrid: (a) C60 is attached on the graphenic surface simultaneously with the pyrene stacking, and (b) C60 is kept far from G and pyrene. Reprinted with permission from ref 176. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 45

    Figure 45. SEM and TEM micrographs of (a,d) bulk nanodiamonds, (b,e) few-layer graphene (FLG), and (c,f) the FLG/NDs hybrid. Reprinted with permission from ref 178. Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 46

    Figure 46. Schematic representation that shows how the removal of oxidative debris is correlated with the reduced electroactivity of GO in cyclic voltametry. Reprinted with permission from ref 182. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 47

    Figure 47. (a–c) Low-resolution TEM images of BN, MoS2, and WS2 layered flakes. (d–f) High-resolution TEM images of BN, MoS2, and WS2 monolayers. The insets show fast Fourier transforms of the images. (g–i) Butterworth-filtered images of sections of the images in panels (d), (e), and (f), respectively. Reprinted with permission from ref 190. Copyright 2011 American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Figure 48

    Figure 48. Schematic representation of three similar liquid exfoliation processes based on (a) intercalation, (b) ion exchange, and (c) ultrasonic exfoliation. Reprinted with permission from ref 69. Copyright 2013 American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Figure 49

    Figure 49. Schematic representation of the device with G and MoS2. Reprinted with permission from ref 198. Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 50

    Figure 50. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns and (b) Raman spectra of bare WS2 and the hybrids WS2/rGO in two different ratios. Reprinted with permission from ref 203. Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 51

    Figure 51. Schematic representation of a field-effect transistor constructed by graphene, MoS2, and h-BN layers. Reprinted with permission from ref 204. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 52

    Figure 52. Schematic of the synthesis method used to prepare symmetrically deposited CVD graphene sheets with different metals on either side. Reprinted with permission from ref 224. Copyright 2015 Wiley-VCH.

    Figure 53

    Figure 53. Schematic showing the synthesis of the Ni3S2/rGO 3D framework. Reprinted with permission from ref 237. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 54

    Figure 54. Synthesis of (a) Pt nanodendrites and (b) Pt nanoclusters deposited onto GO using DNA as a template. Panel (a) reprinted with permission from ref 246. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. Panel (b) reprinted with permission from ref 247. Copyright 2013 Nature Publishing Group.

    Figure 55

    Figure 55. Polarization curves obtained for the Pt–Pd–rGO EHER catalysts, with different Pt thickness and equal Pd loading amounts. Pt–Pd–rGO I, Pt–Pd–rGO II, and Pt–Pd–rGO III show Pt layer thicknesses of 0.8, 1.8, and 3.2 nm, respectively. Reprinted with permission from ref 262. Copyright 2014 Wiley-VCH.

    Figure 56

    Figure 56. Charge carrier density in a graphene sensor versus hydrogen concentration. Reprinted with permission from ref 271. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 57

    Figure 57. Synthesis of rGO/Pt–Pd supported catalysts. Reprinted with permission from ref 272. Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V.

    Figure 58

    Figure 58. Capacity of the Si/rGO material at various current densities upon cycling. Reprinted with permission from ref 285. Copyright 2013 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 59

    Figure 59. Cycling performance of Co3O4 NPs (nanoparticles), Co3O4 NFs (nanofibers), Co3O4 NF/rGO composite, and Co3O4 NFs/GNF (graphene) materials under a specific capacity limit of 1000 mA h g–1 in a voltage window between 4.35 and 2.0 V at a current density of 200 mA g–1. Reprinted with permission from ref 294. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 60

    Figure 60. (a) Magnetic deformation of the magnetic Fe3O4/rGO aerogel, (b) IV curve and thermal conductivity stability of the aerogel, and (c) change in the electrical resistance of the aerogel as a function of the magnetic field-induced deformation. Reprinted with permission from ref 298. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 61

    Figure 61. (a) Charge–discharge voltage profiles of the T-200 hybrid cycled at 1.0–3.0 V at a current density of 0.1 A g–1, (b) rate performances of T-200, C1, and C2 at various current densities, and (c) cycling performance of T-150, T-200, T-240, C1, and C2 at a current density of 0.1 A g–1. Reprinted with permission from ref 339. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 62

    Figure 62. Synthetic methods used to produce SAC–rGO (right bottom) and rGO (left bottom). A schematic of the electrochemical device used to measure the supercapacitance of the material is also shown. Reprinted with permission from ref 345. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 63

    Figure 63. G–TiO2 hybrid-based solar cell performance under simulated AM 1.5, 106.5 mW/cm2 solar irradiation (red line), and that in the dark (black line). Reprinted with permission from ref 351. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 64

    Figure 64. DSSCs performance with NDG/CoS, G/CoS, NDG, and Pt as CEs. Reprinted with permission from ref 359. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 65

    Figure 65. (a) HER polarization curves for catalysts, (b) Tafel plots, (c) stability test of Mo2C–rGO hybrid, and (d) time dependence of current density of Mo2C–rGO hybrid at an applied potential of 140 mV. Reprinted with permission from ref 373. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 66

    Figure 66. Synthesis of AC–GO and AC–rGO hybrids. The blue platelets represent aminoclay, while the brown and gray sheets show GO and rGO, respectively. Reprinted with permission from ref 377. Copyright 2013 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 67

    Figure 67. (a) Schematic diagram of the basic concept of the experiment: proper pH is used to affect charge attraction/repulsion between the GO sheets and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Fe2O3 nanoparticles separated from solution or dispersion by applied magnetic field. (b) Zeta potentials of GO and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Reprinted with permission from ref 378. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 68

    Figure 68. Conductivity of various hybrid materials of G/rGO. Reprinted with permission from ref 394. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 69

    Figure 69. Electric transport calibrations of G and heterostructure (H) electric field devices. (a) Optical microscope image of the H-device. (b) Raman mapping of 2D, G, and D peaks. (c) G resistivity at various position contacts (P1–P4) versus back-gate voltage (UBG) at room temperature.(d) Electric charge mobility of G in H- and G-devices versus carrier concentration (n) at room temperature.(e) The electric charge mobility in H- and G-devices at n = −2 × 1012 cm–2. (f) Conductivity of G in H3 and G1 in the vicinity of their charge neutrality points at room temperature. (g) Electrons and holes coexistence represented by Hall coefficient calibrations for devices H3 and G1 at a magnetic field of 1 T and a temperature of 250 mK. Dashed lines showed the single-particle model for holes and electrons. Reprinted with permission from ref 397. Copyright 2014 Wiley-VCH.

    Figure 70

    Figure 70. Photovoltaic and impedance performances of the DSSCs with different G/TiO2 photoanodes. Reprinted with permission from ref 408. Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 71

    Figure 71. General mechanism for H2 evolution from photocatalytic water splitting by the g-C3N4/rGO-3 hybrid, in which g-C3N4 acts as an electron sink providing the separation of electron–hole pairs and collects the electrons injected from the photoexcited rGO-3 for subsequent H2 production from reduction of H2O. Reprinted with permission from ref 409. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 72

    Figure 72. Capture of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from breast cancer: (a) patient no. 6 (Br6); (b) patient no. 2 (Br2); and (c) quantification of CTCs. Capture of CTC from pancreatic cancer: (d) patient no. 2 (Pan2); (e) patient no. 9 (Pan9); and (f) quantification of CTCs. Capture of CTC from lung cancer: (g) patient no. 3 (L3); (h) quantification of CTCs; and (i) gene expression of captured CTCs via qRT-PCR. Reprinted with permission from ref 421. Copyright 2013 Nature Publishing Group.

    Figure 73

    Figure 73. SPRi sensing profiles, differential images, and line profiles for detection in human serum: (a,b) Direct detection, (c,d) antibody-conjugated PDA–rGO for signal amplification, and (e,f) sequential Au coated. The red color line in panels (a), (c), and (e) displayed the results on the sensing point, and the black lines are collected from the control point. The blue boundaries in (b), (d), and (f) showed the four sensing points on the SPRi chip. Reprinted with permission from ref 424. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 74

    Figure 74. Fluorescence images of mouse fibroblast NIH/3T3 cells containing (a) CDs and (b,c) GO/CDs hybrids, demonstrating selective labeling of nuclei and cytoplasm. For pure carbon dots, a fast endocytosis occurred, and carbon dots readily entered cell nuclei (panel (a)). However, if GO/CDs hybrids were employed, penetration into cells was gradually inhibited upon increasing GO concentration (panels (b) and (c)). Reprinted with permission from ref 428. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 75

    Figure 75. Schematic diagram for the transdermal delivery of nano GO–hyaluronic acid conjugates into melanoma skin cancer cells under a NIR laser. Reprinted with permission from ref 435. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 76

    Figure 76. Pictures showing the effect of photothermal ablation therapy using NIR irradiation on the tumor growth in mice inoculated with B16F1 cells on both dorsal flanks after topical administration of (a) PBS, (b) NGO, and (c) NGO–HA. (d) Day-dependent relative tumor volume. (e) Time-dependent caspase-3 activity in tumor tissues to evaluate the heat-induced apoptosis (***P < 0.0001). Reprinted with permission from ref 435. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 77

    Figure 77. Schematic diagram for fabrication of biocleavable PDMAEMA–GO sheets by ATRP for gene/drug delivery. Reprinted with permission from ref 438. Copyright 2014 Royal Society of Chemistry.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 446 other publications.

    1. 1
      Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K.; Morozov, S. V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S. V.; Grigorieva, I. V.; Firsov, A. A. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films Science 2004, 306, 666 669 DOI: 10.1126/science.1102896
    2. 2
      Balandin, A. A.; Ghosh, S.; Bao, W.; Calizo, I.; Teweldebrhan, D.; Miao, F.; Lau, C. N. Superior Thermal Conductivity of Single-Layer Graphene Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 902 907 DOI: 10.1021/nl0731872
    3. 3
      Lee, C.; Wei, X.; Kysar, J. W.; Hone, J. Measurement of the Elastic Properties and Intrinsic Strength of Monolayer Graphene Science 2008, 321, 385 388 DOI: 10.1126/science.1157996
    4. 4
      Schafhaeutl, C. Ueber die Verbindungen des Kohlenstoffes mit Silicium, Eisen und anderen Metallen, welche die verschiedenen Gallungen von Roheisen, Stahl und Schmiedeeisen bilden J. Prakt. Chem. 1840, 21, 129 157 DOI: 10.1002/prac.18400210117
    5. 5
      Bernal, J. D. The Structure of Graphite Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1924, 106, 749 773 DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1924.0101
    6. 6
      Wallace, P. R. The Band Theory of Graphite Phys. Rev. 1947, 71, 622 634 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.71.622
    7. 7
      Boehm, H. P.; Clauss, A.; Fisher, G. O.; Hofmann, U. Das Adsorptionsverhalten Sehr Dunner Kohlenstoff-Folien Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1962, 316, 119 127 DOI: 10.1002/zaac.19623160303
    8. 8
      Boehm, H. P.; Clauss, A.; Hofmann, U.; Fisher, G. O. Dunnste Kohlenstoff-Folien Z. Naturforsch., B: J. Chem. Sci. 1962, 17, 150 DOI: 10.1515/znb-1962-0302
    9. 9
      Hofmann, U.; Frenzel, A. Die Reduktion von Graphitoxyd mit Schwefelwasserstoff Colloid Polym. Sci. 1934, 68, 149 151 DOI: 10.1007/BF01451376
    10. 10
      Van Bommel, A. J.; Crombeen, J. E.; Vantooren, A. LEED and Auger-Electron Observation of SiC (0001) Surface Surf. Sci. 1975, 48, 463 472 DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(75)90419-7
    11. 11
      Foster, L. M.; Long, G.; Stumpf, H. C. Production of Graphite Single Crystals by the Thermal Decomposition of Aluminium Carbide Am. Mineral. 1958, 43, 285 296
    12. 12
      Land, T. A.; Michely, T.; Behm, R. J.; Hemminger, J. C.; Comsa, G. STM Investigation of Single Layer Graphite Structures Produced on Pt(111) by Hydrocarbon Decomposition Surf. Sci. 1992, 264, 261 270 DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(92)90183-7
    13. 13
      Forbeaux, I.; Themlin, J. M.; Debever, J. M. Heteroepitaxial Graphite on 6H-SiC(0001): Interface Formation Through Conduction-Band Electronic Structure Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1998, 58, 16396 16406 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.16396
    14. 14
      Grima, J. N.; Winczewski, S.; Mizzi, L.; Grech, M. C.; Cauchi, R.; Gatt, R.; Attard, D.; Wojciechowski, K. W.; Rybicki, J. Tailoring Graphene to Achieve Negative Poisson’s Ratio Properties Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 1455 1459 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201404106
    15. 15
      Kroto, H. W.; Heath, J. R.; O’Brien, S. C.; Curl, R. F.; Smalley, R. E. C60 – Buckminsterfullerene Nature 1985, 318, 162 163 DOI: 10.1038/318162a0
    16. 16
      Iijima, S.; Yudasaka, M.; Yamada, R.; Bandow, S.; Suenaga, K.; Kokai, F.; Takahashi, K. Nano-Aggregates of Single-Walled Graphitic Carbon Nano-Horns Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 309, 165 170 DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00642-9
    17. 17
      Iijima, S. Helical Microtubules of Graphitic Carbon Nature 1991, 354, 56 58 DOI: 10.1038/354056a0
    18. 18
      Iijima, S.; Ichihashi, T. Single-Shell Carbon Nanotubes of 1-nm Diameter Nature 1993, 363, 603 605 DOI: 10.1038/363603a0
    19. 19
      Bethune, D. S.; Kiang, C. H.; de Vries, M. S.; Gorman, G.; Savoy, R.; Vazquez, J.; Beyers, R. Cobalt-Catalyzed Growth of Carbon Nanotubes with Single-Atomic-Layerwalls Nature 1993, 363, 605 607 DOI: 10.1038/363605a0
    20. 20
      Geim, A. K.; Novoselov, K. S. The Rise of Graphene Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183 191 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1849
    21. 21
      Bolotin, K. I.; Sikes, K. J.; Jiang, Z.; Klima, M.; Fudenberg, G.; Hone, J.; Kim, P.; Stormer, H. L. Ultrahigh Electron Mobility in Suspended Graphene Solid State Commun. 2008, 146, 351 355 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2008.02.024
    22. 22
      Abergel, D. S. L.; Apalkov, V.; Berashevich, J.; Ziegler, K.; Chakraborty, T. Properties of Graphene: a Theoretical Perspective Adv. Phys. 2010, 59, 261 482 DOI: 10.1080/00018732.2010.487978
    23. 23
      Zhang, Z. Z.; Chang, K. Tuning of Energy Levels and Optical Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2008, 77, 235411 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.235411
    24. 24
      Nakada, K.; Fujita, M.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S. Edge State in Graphene Ribbons: Nanometer Size Effect and Edge Shape Dependence Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1996, 54, 17954 17961 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.17954
    25. 25
      Kim, W. Y.; Kim, K. S. Prediction of Very Large Values of Magnetoresistance in a Graphene Nanoribbon Device Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 408 412 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2008.163
    26. 26
      Nair, R. R.; Blake, P.; Grigorenko, A. N.; Novoselov, K. S.; Booth, T. J.; Stauber, T.; Peres, N. M. R.; Geim, A. K. Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene Science 2008, 320, 1308 DOI: 10.1126/science.1156965
    27. 27
      Staudenmaier, L. Verfahren zur Darstellung der Graphitsäure Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1898, 31, 1481 1487 DOI: 10.1002/cber.18980310237
    28. 28
      Hummers, W. S.; Offeman, R. E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339 DOI: 10.1021/ja01539a017
    29. 29
      Marcano, D. C.; Kosynkin, D. V.; Berlin, J. M.; Sinitskii, A.; Sun, Z. Z.; Slesarev, A.; Alemany, L. B.; Lu, W.; Tour, J. M. Improved Synthesis of Graphene Oxide ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4806 4814 DOI: 10.1021/nn1006368
    30. 30
      Dryer, D. R.; Park, S.; Bielawski, C. W.; Ruoff, R. S. The Chemistry of Graphene Oxide Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 229 240 DOI: 10.1039/B917103G
    31. 31
      Hofmann, U.; Konig, E. Untersuchungen über Graphitoxyd Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1937, 234, 311 336 DOI: 10.1002/zaac.19372340405
    32. 32
      Fisher, E. Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1894, 27, 2985 2993 DOI: 10.1002/cber.18940270364
    33. 33
      Lehn, J. M. Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and Perspectives; Wiley: New York, 1995.
    34. 34
      McMurry, J.; Fayl McCarty, R. C. Chemistry; Pearson Education: New York, 2004.
    35. 35
      Lide, D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 85th ed.; Taylor & Francis: New York, 2004.
    36. 36
      Atkins, P.; de Paula, J. Physical Chemistry, 7th ed.; W. H. Freeman: New York, 2002.
    37. 37
      Steed, J. W.; Atwood, J. L. Supramolecular Chemistry, 2nd ed; Wiley: New York, 2013.
    38. 38
      Skinner, H. A.; Connor, J. A. Metal-Ligand Bond-Energies in Organometallic Compounds Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 79 88 DOI: 10.1351/pac198557010079
    39. 39
      Smithrud, D. B.; Sanford, E. M.; Chao, I.; Ferguson, S. B.; Carcanague, D. R.; Evanseck, J. D.; Houk, K. N.; Diederich, F. Solvent Effects in Molecular Recognition Pure Appl. Chem. 1990, 62, 2227 2236 DOI: 10.1351/pac199062122227
    40. 40
      Southall, N. T.; Dill, K. A.; Haymet, A. D. J. A View of the Hydrophobic Effect J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 521 533 DOI: 10.1021/jp015514e
    41. 41
      Hunter, C. A.; Lawson, K. R.; Perkins, C.; Urch, C. J. Aromatic Interactions J. Chem. Soc. Perk. T. 2001, 2, 651 669 DOI: 10.1039/b008495f
    42. 42
      Zhang, Z. X.; Huang, H. L.; Yang, X. M.; Zang, L. Tailoring Electronic Properties of Graphene by pi-pi Stacking with Aromatic Molecules J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 2897 2905 DOI: 10.1021/jz201273r
    43. 43
      Kozlov, S. M.; Vines, F.; Gorling, A. On the Interaction of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds with Graphene Carbon 2012, 50, 2482 2492 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.070
    44. 44
      De Feyter, S.; De Schryver, F. C. Two-Dimensional Supramolecular Self-Assembly Probed by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32, 139 150 DOI: 10.1039/b206566p
    45. 45
      Foster, J. S.; Frommer, J. E. Imaging of Liquid-Crystals Using a Tunnelling Microscope Nature 1988, 333, 542 545 DOI: 10.1038/333542a0
    46. 46
      Griessl, S.; Lackinger, M.; Edelwirth, M.; Hietschold, M.; Heckl, W. M. Self-Assembled Two-Dimensional Molecular Host-Guest Architectures from Trimesic Acid Single Mol. 2002, 3, 25 31 DOI: 10.1002/1438-5171(200204)3:1<25::AID-SIMO25>3.0.CO;2-K
    47. 47
      Lackinger, M.; Griessl, S.; Heckl, W. M.; Hietschold, M. STM and STS of Coronene on HOPG(0001) in UHV – Adsorption of the Smallest Possible Graphite Flakes on Graphite Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002, 374, 685 687 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-002-1458-9
    48. 48
      Shayeganfar, F.; Rochefort, A. Electronic Properties of Self-Assembled Trimesic Acid Monolayer on Graphene Langmuir 2014, 30, 9707 9716 DOI: 10.1021/la501619b
    49. 49
      Zhou, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Fang, Y.; Wang, C. Switchable Supramolecular Assemblies on Graphene Nanoscale 2014, 6, 8387 8391 DOI: 10.1039/c4nr01796j
    50. 50
      MacLeod, J. M.; Lipton-Duffin, J. A.; Cui, D.; De Feyter, S.; Rosei, F. Substrate Effects in the Supramolecular Assembly of 1,3,5-Benzene Tricarboxylic Acid on Graphite and Graphene Langmuir 2015, 31, 7016 7024 DOI: 10.1021/la5048886
    51. 51
      Chen, W.; Chen, S.; Qi, D. C.; Gao, X. Y.; Wee, A. T. S. Surface Transfer p-Type Doping of Epitaxial Graphene J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10418 10422 DOI: 10.1021/ja071658g
    52. 52
      Coletti, C.; Riedl, C.; Lee, D. S.; Krauss, B.; Patthey, L.; von Klitzing, K.; Smet, J. H.; Starke, U. Charge Neutrality and Band-Gap Tuning of Epitaxial Graphene on SiC by Molecular Doping Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 81, 235401 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.235401
    53. 53
      Stradi, D.; Garnica, M.; Diaz, C.; Calleja, F.; Barja, S.; Martin, N.; Alcami, M.; de Parga, A. L. V.; Miranda, R.; Martin, F. Controlling the Spatial Arrangement of Organic Magnetic Anions Adsorbed on Epitaxial Graphene on Ru(0001) Nanoscale 2014, 6, 15271 15279 DOI: 10.1039/C4NR02917H
    54. 54
      Huang, H.; Chen, S.; Gao, X.; Chen, W.; Wee, A. T. S. Structural and Electronic Properties of PTCDA Thin Films on Epitaxial Graphene ACS Nano 2009, 3, 3431 3436 DOI: 10.1021/nn9008615
    55. 55
      Lauffer, P.; Emtsev, K. V.; Graupner, R.; Seyller, T.; Ley, L. Molecular and Electronic Structure of PTCDA on Bilayer Graphene on SiC(0001) Studied with Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Phys. Status Solidi B 2008, 245, 2064 2067 DOI: 10.1002/pssb.200879615
    56. 56
      Wang, Q. H.; Hersam, M. C. Room-Temperature Molecular-Resolution Characterization of Self-Assembled Organic Monolayers on Epitaxial Graphene Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 206 211 DOI: 10.1038/nchem.212
    57. 57
      Emery, J. D.; Wang, Q. H.; Zarrouati, M.; Fenter, P.; Hersam, M. C.; Bedzyk, M. J. Structural Analysis of PTCDA Monolayers on Epitaxial Graphene with Ultra-High Vacuum Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and High-Resolution X-ray Reflectivity Surf. Sci. 2011, 605, 1685 1693 DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2010.11.008
    58. 58
      Pollard, A. J.; Perkins, E. W.; Smith, N. A.; Saywell, A.; Goretzki, G.; Phillips, A. G.; Argent, S. P.; Sachdev, H.; Mueller, F.; Huefner, S. Supramolecular Assemblies Formed on an Epitaxial Graphene Superstructure Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1794 1799 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200905503
    59. 59
      Karmel, H. J.; Garramone, J. J.; Emery, J. D.; Kewalramani, S.; Bedzyk, M. J.; Hersam, M. C. Self-Assembled Organic Monolayers on Epitaxial Graphene with Enhanced Structural and Thermal Stability Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 8852 8855 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC02761B
    60. 60
      Kozlov, S. M.; Vines, F.; Gorling, A. Bandgap Engineering of Graphene by Physisorbed Adsorbates Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2638 2643 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201100171
    61. 61
      Zhang, L. M.; Yu, J. W.; Yang, M. M.; Xie, Q.; Peng, H. L.; Liu, Z. F. Janus Graphene from Asymmetric Two-Dimensional Chemistry Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1443 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2464
    62. 62
      Hernandez, Y.; Nicolosi, V.; Lotya, M.; Blighe, F. M.; Sun, Z.; De, S.; McGovern, I. T.; Holland, B.; Byrne, M.; Gun’Ko, Y. K. High-Yield Production of Graphene by Liquid-Phase Exfoliation of Graphite Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 563 568 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2008.215
    63. 63
      Pykal, M.; Safarova, K.; Siskova, K. M.; Jurecka, P.; Bourlinos, A. B.; Zboril, R.; Otyepka, M. Lipid Enhanced Exfoliation for Production of Graphene Nanosheets J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 11800 11803 DOI: 10.1021/jp401277g
    64. 64
      Hernandez, Y.; Lotya, M.; Rickard, D.; Bergin, S. D.; Coleman, J. N. Measurement of Multicomponent Solubility Parameters for Graphene Facilitates Solvent Discovery Langmuir 2010, 26, 3208 3213 DOI: 10.1021/la903188a
    65. 65
      Khan, U.; O’Neill, A.; Lotya, M.; De, S.; Coleman, J. N. High-Concentration Solvent Exfoliation of Graphene Small 2010, 6, 864 871 DOI: 10.1002/smll.200902066
    66. 66
      O’Neill, A.; Khan, U.; Nirmalraj, P. N.; Boland, J.; Coleman, J. N. Graphene Dispersion and Exfoliation in Low Boiling Point Solvents J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 5422 5428 DOI: 10.1021/jp110942e
    67. 67
      Coleman, J. N. Liquid Exfoliation of Defect-Free Graphene Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 14 22 DOI: 10.1021/ar300009f
    68. 68
      Hughes, J. M.; Ahrene, D.; Coleman, J. N. Generalizing Solubility Parameter Theory to Apply to One- and Two-Dimensional Solutes and to Incorporate Dipolar Interactions J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 127, 4483 4491 DOI: 10.1002/app.38051
    69. 69
      Nicolosi, V.; Chhowalla, M.; Kanatzidis, M. G.; Strano, M. S.; Coleman, J. N. Liquid Exfoliation of Layered Materials Science 2013, 340, 1226419 DOI: 10.1126/science.1226419
    70. 70
      Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Abidi, N.; Cabrales, L. Wettability and Surface Free Energy of Graphene Films Langmuir 2009, 25, 11078 11081 DOI: 10.1021/la901402f
    71. 71
      Hansen, C. M. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User’s Handbook, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: New York, 2007.
    72. 72
      Hansen, C. M. The Three Dimensional Solubility Parameter and Solvent Diffusion Coefficient: Their Importance in Surface Coating Formulation; Danish Technical Press, 1967.
    73. 73
      Hildebrand, J. H.; Prausnitz, J. M.; Scott, R. L. Regular and Related Solutions: the Solubility of Gases, Liquids, and Solids; van Nostrand Reinhold Co.: New York, 1970.
    74. 74
      Zhang, Y. H.; Liu, C. J.; Shi, W. Q.; Wang, Z. Q.; Dai, L. M.; Zhang, X. Direct Measurements of the Interaction between Pyrene and Graphite in Aqueous Media by Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy: Understanding the π-π Interactions Langmuir 2007, 23, 7911 7915 DOI: 10.1021/la700876d
    75. 75
      Manohar, S.; Mantz, A. R.; Bancroft, K. E.; Hui, C. Y.; Jagota, A.; Vezenov, D. V. Peeling Single-Stranded DNA from Graphite Surface to Determine Oligonucleotide Binding Energy by Force Spectroscopy Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 4365 4372 DOI: 10.1021/nl8022143
    76. 76
      Georgakilas, V.; Otyepka, M.; Bourlinos, A. B.; Chandra, V.; Kim, N.; Kemp, K. C.; Hobza, P.; Zboril, R.; Kim, K. S. Functionalization of Graphene: Covalent and Non-Covalent Approaches, Derivatives and Applications Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 6156 6214 DOI: 10.1021/cr3000412
    77. 77
      Lee, E. C.; Kim, D.; Jurečka, P.; Tarakeshwar, P.; Hobza, P.; Kim, K. S. Understanding of Assembly Phenomena by Aromatic-Aromatic Interactions: Benzene Dimer and the Substituted Systems J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 3446 3457 DOI: 10.1021/jp068635t
    78. 78
      Su, Q.; Pang, S.; Alijani, V.; Li, C.; Feng, X.; Muellen, K. Composites of Graphene with Large Aromatic Molecules Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 3191 3195 DOI: 10.1002/adma.200803808
    79. 79
      Zhang, X. F.; Liu, S. P.; Shao, X. N. Noncovalent Binding of Xanthene and Phthalocyanine Dyes with Graphene Sheets: The Effect of the Molecular Structure Revealed by a Photophysical Study Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2013, 113, 92 99 DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2013.04.066
    80. 80
      Yang, X.; Li, J.; Wen, T.; Ren, X.; Huang, Y.; Wang, X. Adsorption of Naphthalene and Its Derivatives on Magnetic Graphene Composites and the Mechanism Investigation Colloids Surf., A 2013, 422, 118 125 DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.11.063
    81. 81
      Zhang, X. F.; Shao, X. Binding Ability of Different Carbon Nano-Materials with Aromatic Phthalocyanine Molecules: Comparison between Graphene and Graphene Oxide J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2014, 278, 69 74 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2014.01.001
    82. 82
      Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Chen, B. Adsorption of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Graphene and Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 4817 4825 DOI: 10.1021/es405227u
    83. 83
      Chen, I. W. P.; Huang, C. Y.; Jhou, S. H. S.; Zhang, Y. W. Exfoliation and Performance Properties of Non-Oxidized Graphene in Water Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3928 DOI: 10.1038/srep03928
    84. 84
      Bourlinos, A. B.; Georgakilas, V.; Zboril, R.; Steriotis, T. A.; Stubos, A. K. Liquid-Phase Exfoliation of Graphite towards Solubilized Graphenes Small 2009, 5, 1841 1845 DOI: 10.1002/smll.200900242
    85. 85
      Kim, J.; Song, S. H.; Im, H. G.; Yoon, G.; Lee, D.; Choi, C.; Kim, J.; Bae, B. S.; Kang, K.; Jeon, S. Moisture Barrier Composites Made of Non-Oxidized Graphene Flakes Small 2015, 11, 3124 3129 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201403647
    86. 86
      Lee, D. W.; Kim, T.; Lee, M. An Amphiphilic Pyrene Sheet for Selective Functionalization of Graphene Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 8259 8261 DOI: 10.1039/c1cc12868j
    87. 87
      Yang, H.; Hernandez, Y.; Schlierf, A.; Felten, A.; Eckmann, A.; Johal, S.; Louette, P.; Pireaux, J. J.; Feng, X.; Muellen, K. A Simple Method for Graphene Production Based on Exfoliation of Graphite in Water Using 1-Pyrenesulfonic Acid Sodium Salt Carbon 2013, 53, 357 365 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.11.022
    88. 88
      Jang, J. H.; Rangappa, D.; Kwon, Y. U.; Honma, I. Direct Preparation of 1-PSA Modified Graphene Nanosheets by Supercritical Fluidic Exfoliation and Its Electrochemical Properties J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 3462 3466 DOI: 10.1039/C0JM02472D
    89. 89
      An, X. H.; Simmons, T. J.; Shah, R.; Wolfe, C.; Lewis, K. M.; Washington, M.; Nayak, S. K.; Talapatra, S.; Kar, S. Stable Aqueous Dispersions of Noncovalently Functionalized Graphene from Graphite and their Multifunctional High-Performance Applications Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 4295 4301 DOI: 10.1021/nl903557p
    90. 90
      Dong, X. C.; Shi, Y. M.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, D. M.; Ye, J.; Yao, Y. G.; Gao, F.; Ni, Z. H.; Yu, T.; Shen, Z. X. Symmetry Breaking of Graphene Monolayers by Molecular Decoration Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 135501 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.135501
    91. 91
      Zhang, M.; Parajuli, R. R.; Mastrogiovanni, D.; Dai, B.; Lo, P.; Cheung, W.; Brukh, R.; Chiu, P. L.; Zhou, T.; Liu, Z. F. Production of Graphene Sheets by Direct Dispersion with Aromatic Healing Agents Small 2010, 6, 1100 1107 DOI: 10.1002/smll.200901978
    92. 92
      Schlierf, A.; Yang, H.; Gebremedhn, E.; Treossi, E.; Ortolani, L.; Chen, L.; Minoia, A.; Morandi, V.; Samori, P.; Casiraghi, C. Nanoscale Insight into the Exfoliation Mechanism of Graphene with Organic Dyes: Effect of Charge, Dipole and Molecular Structure Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4205 4216 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr00258f
    93. 93
      Song, S. H.; Park, K. H.; Kim, B. H.; Choi, Y. W.; Jun, G. H.; Lee, D. J.; Kong, B. S.; Paik, K. W.; Jeon, S. Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of Epoxy–Graphene Composites by Using Non-Oxidized Graphene Flakes with Non-Covalent Functionalization Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 732 737 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201202736
    94. 94
      Khanra, P.; Uddin, M. E.; Kim, N. H.; Kuila, T.; Lee, S. H.; Lee, J. H. Electrochemical Performance of Reduced Graphene Oxide Surface-Modified with 9-Anthracene Carboxylic Acid RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 6443 6451 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA12356E
    95. 95
      Bose, S.; Kuila, T.; Mishra, A. K.; Kim, N. H.; Lee, J. H. Preparation of Non-Covalently Functionalized Graphene Using 9-Anthracene Carboxylic Acid Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 405603 DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/40/405603
    96. 96
      Das, S.; Irin, F.; Ahmed, H. S. T.; Cortinas, A. B.; Wajid, A. S.; Parviz, D.; Jankowski, A. F.; Kato, M.; Green, M. J. Non-Covalent Functionalization of Pristine Few-Layer Graphene Using Triphenylene Derivatives for Conductive Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) Composites Polymer 2012, 53, 2485 2494 DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.03.012
    97. 97
      Ghosh, A.; Rao, K. V.; George, S. J.; Rao, C. N. R. Noncovalent Functionalization, Exfoliation, and Solubilization of Graphene in Water by Employing a Fluorescent Coronene Carboxylate Chem. - Eur. J. 2010, 16, 2700 2704 DOI: 10.1002/chem.200902828
    98. 98
      Ma, W. S.; Wu, L.; Yang, F.; Wang, S. F. Non-Covalently Modified Reduced Graphene Oxide/Polyurethane Nanocomposites with Good Mechanical and Thermal Properties J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 562 571 DOI: 10.1007/s10853-013-7736-4
    99. 99
      Lonkar, S. P.; Bobenrieth, A.; De Winter, J.; Gerbaux, P.; Raquez, J. M.; Dubois, P. A Supramolecular Approach toward Organo-Dispersible Graphene and Its Straightforward Polymer Nanocomposites J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 18124 18126 DOI: 10.1039/c2jm34234k
    100. 100
      Yang, Y. K.; He, C. E.; Peng, R. G.; Baji, A.; Du, X. S.; Huang, Y. L.; Xie, X. L.; Mai, Y. W. Non-Covalently Modified Graphene Sheets by Imidazolium Ionic Liquids for Multifunctional Polymer Nanocomposites J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 5666 5675 DOI: 10.1039/c2jm16006d
    101. 101
      Bari, R.; Tamas, G.; Irin, F.; Aquino, A. J. A.; Green, M. J.; Quitevis, E. L. Direct Exfoliation of Graphene in Ionic Liquids with Aromatic Groups Colloids Surf., A 2014, 463, 63 69 DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.09.024
    102. 102
      Zhang, B.; Ning, W.; Zhang, J.; Qiao, X.; Zhang, J.; He, J.; Liu, C. Y. Stable Dispersions of Reduced Graphene Oxide in Ionic Liquids J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 5401 5403 DOI: 10.1039/c0jm01029d
    103. 103
      Kim, T. Y.; Lee, H. W.; Kim, J. E.; Suh, K. S. Synthesis of Phase Transferable Graphene Sheets Using Ionic Liquid Polymers ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1612 1618 DOI: 10.1021/nn901525e
    104. 104
      Geng, J.; Jung, H. T. Porphyrin Functionalized Graphene Sheets in Aqueous Suspensions: From the Preparation of Graphene Sheets to Highly Conductive Graphene Films J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 8227 8234 DOI: 10.1021/jp1008779
    105. 105
      Xu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Bai, H.; Hong, W.; Li, C.; Shi, G. Chemically Converted Graphene Induced Molecular Flattening of 5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(1-methyl-4-pyridinio)porphyrin and Its Application for Optical Detection of Cadmium(II) Ions J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13490 13497 DOI: 10.1021/ja905032g
    106. 106
      Arramel, A.; Castellanos-Gomez, B.; van Wees, J. Band Gap Opening of Graphene by Noncovalent π-π Interaction with Porphyrins Graphene 2013, 2, 102 108 DOI: 10.4236/graphene.2013.23015
    107. 107
      Bozkurt, E.; Acar, M.; Onganer, Y.; Meral, K. Rhodamine 101-Graphene Oxide Composites in Aqueous Solution: the Fluorescence Quenching Process of Rhodamine 101 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 18276 18281 DOI: 10.1039/C4CP01492H
    108. 108
      Jiang, B. P.; Hu, L. F.; Wang, D. J.; Ji, S. C.; Shen, X. C.; Liang, H. Graphene Loading Water-Soluble Phthalocyanine for Dual-Modality Photothermal/Photodynamic Therapy via a One-Step Method J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 7141 7148 DOI: 10.1039/C4TB01038H
    109. 109
      Chien, C. T.; Li, S. S.; Lai, W. J.; Yeh, Y. C.; Chen, H. A.; Chen, I. S.; Chen, L. C.; Chen, K. H.; Nemoto, T.; Isoda, S. Tunable Photoluminescence from Graphene Oxide Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6662 6666 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201200474
    110. 110
      Zhang, X. F.; Shao, X.; Liu, S. Dual Fluorescence of Graphene Oxide: A Time-Resolved Study J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 7308 7313 DOI: 10.1021/jp301755b
    111. 111
      Loh, K. P.; Bao, Q. L.; Eda, G.; Chhowalla, M. Graphene Oxide as a Chemically Tunable Platform for Optical Applications Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 1015 1024 DOI: 10.1038/nchem.907
    112. 112
      Iliut, M.; Gabudean, A. M.; Leordean, C.; Simon, T.; Teodorescu, C. M.; Astilean, S. Riboflavin Enhanced Fluorescence of Highly Reduced Graphene Oxide Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 586, 127 131 DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.09.032
    113. 113
      Fernandez-Merino, M. J.; Paredes, J. I.; Villar-Rodil, S.; Guardia, L.; Solis-Fernandez, P.; Salinas-Torres, D.; Cazorla-Amoros, D.; Morallon, E.; Martinez-Alonso, A.; Tascon, J. M. D. Investigating the Influence of Surfactants on the Stabilization of Aqueous Reduced Graphene Oxide Dispersions and the Characteristics of Their Composite Films Carbon 2012, 50, 3184 3194 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.10.039
    114. 114
      Bourlinos, A. B.; Georgakilas, V.; Zboril, R.; Steriotis, T. A.; Stubos, A. K.; Trapalis, C. Aqueous-Phase Exfoliation of Graphite in the Presence of Polyvinylpyrrolidone for the Production of Water-Soluble Graphenes Solid State Commun. 2009, 149, 2172 2176 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2009.09.018
    115. 115
      Liang, Y.; Wu, D.; Feng, X.; Mullen, K. Dispersion of Graphene Sheets in Organic Solvent Supported by Ionic Interactions Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1 5 DOI: 10.1002/adma.200803160
    116. 116
      Carrasco, P. M.; Montes, S.; Garcia, I.; Borghei, M.; Jiang, H.; Odriozola, I.; Cabanero, G.; Ruiz, V. High-Concentration Aqueous Dispersions of Graphene Produced by Exfoliation of Graphite Using Cellulose Nanocrystals Carbon 2014, 70, 157 163 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.12.086
    117. 117
      Lotya, M.; King, P. J.; Khan, U.; De, S.; Coleman, J. N. High-Concentration, Surfactant-Stabilized Graphene Dispersions ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3155 3162 DOI: 10.1021/nn1005304
    118. 118
      Lotya, M.; Hernandez, Y.; King, P. J.; Smith, R. J.; Nicolosi, V.; Karlsson, L. S.; Blighe, F. M.; De, S.; Wang, Z.; McGovern, I. T. Liquid Phase Production of Graphene by Exfoliation of Graphite in Surfactant/Water Solutions J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3611 3620 DOI: 10.1021/ja807449u
    119. 119
      Cai, M.; Thorpe, D.; Adamson, D. H.; Schniepp, H. C. Methods of Graphite Exfoliation J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 24992 25002 DOI: 10.1039/c2jm34517j
    120. 120
      Yang, Q.; Pan, X.; Huang, F.; Li, K. Fabrication of High-Concentration and Stable Aqueous Suspensions of Graphene Nanosheets by Noncovalent Functionalization with Lignin and Cellulose Derivatives J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 3811 3816 DOI: 10.1021/jp910232x
    121. 121
      Choi, E. Y.; Han, T. H.; Hong, J.; Kim, J. E.; Lee, S. H.; Kim, H. W.; Kim, S. O. Noncovalent Functionalization of Graphene with End-Functional Polymers J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 1907 1912 DOI: 10.1039/b919074k
    122. 122
      Lian, M.; Fan, J.; Shi, Z.; Li, H.; Yin, J. Kevlar-Functionalized Graphene Nanoribbon for Polymer Reinforcement Polymer 2014, 55, 2578 2587 DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.03.059
    123. 123
      Zhang, J.; Xu, Y.; Cui, L.; Fu, A.; Yang, W.; Barrow, C.; Liu, J. Mechanical Properties of Graphene Films Enhanced by Homo-Telechelic Functionalized Polymer Fillers via p–p Stacking Interactions Composites, Part A 2015, 71, 1 8 DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.013
    124. 124
      Chandra, V.; Kim, K. S. Highly Selective Adsorption of Hg2+ by Polypyrrole-Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 3942 3944 DOI: 10.1039/c1cc00005e
    125. 125
      Stankovich, S.; Piner, R. D.; Chen, X.; Wu, N.; Nguyen, S. T.; Ruoff, R. S. Stable Aqueous Dispersions of Graphitic Nanoplatelets via the Reduction of Exfoliated Graphite Oxide in the Presence of Poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 155 158 DOI: 10.1039/B512799H
    126. 126
      Bai, H.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Li, C.; Shi, G. Non-Covalent Functionalization of Graphene Sheets by Sulfonated Polyaniline Chem. Commun. 2009, 1667 1669 DOI: 10.1039/b821805f
    127. 127
      Matos, C. F.; Galembeck, F.; Zarbin, A. J. G. Multifunctional and Environmentally Friendly Nanocomposites between Natural Rubber and Graphene or Graphene Oxide Carbon 2014, 78, 469 479 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.028
    128. 128
      Hsiao, S. T.; Ma, C. C. M.; Tien, H. W.; Liao, W. H.; Wang, Y. S.; Li, S. M.; Huang, Y. C. Using a Non-Covalent Modification to Prepare a High Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Performance Graphene Nanosheet/Water-Borne Polyurethane Composite Carbon 2013, 60, 57 66 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.056
    129. 129
      Lee, D. Y.; Khatun, Z.; Lee, J. H.; Lee, Y.; In, I. Blood Compatible Graphene/Heparin Conjugate through Noncovalent Chemistry Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 336 341 DOI: 10.1021/bm101031a
    130. 130
      Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Huang, X.; Zhou, X.; Wu, H.; Guo, S. Assembly of Graphene Oxide–Enzyme Conjugates through Hydrophobic Interaction Small 2012, 8, 154 159 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201101695
    131. 131
      Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Yang, H.; Huang, X.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Guo, S. Graphene Oxide as a Matrix for Enzyme Immobilization Langmuir 2010, 26, 6083 6085 DOI: 10.1021/la904014z
    132. 132
      Alwarappan, S.; Boyapalle, S.; Kumar, A.; Li, C. Z.; Mohapatra, S. Comparative Study of Single-, Few-, and Multilayered Graphene toward Enzyme Conjugation and Electrochemical Response J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 6556 6559 DOI: 10.1021/jp211201b
    133. 133
      Heien, M. L. A. V.; Khan, A. S.; Ariansen, J. L.; Cheer, J. F.; Phillips, P. E. M.; Wassum, K. M.; Wightman, R. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102, 10023 10028 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0504657102
    134. 134
      Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Tang, L.; Lu, J.; Li, J. Application of Graphene-Modified Electrode for Selective Detection of Dopamine Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 889 892 DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.02.013
    135. 135
      Kim, Y. R.; Bong, S.; Kang, Y. J.; Yang, Y.; Mahajan, R. K.; Kim, J. S.; Kim, H. Electrochemical Detection of Dopamine in the Presence of Ascorbic Acid Using Graphene Modified Electrodes Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 25, 2366 2369 DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.02.031
    136. 136
      Lian, Q.; He, Z.; He, Q.; Luo, A.; Yan, K.; Zhang, D.; Lu, X.; Zhou, X. Simultaneous Determination of Ascorbic Acid, Dopamine and Uric Acid Based on Tryptophan Functionalized Graphene Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 823, 32 39 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.03.032
    137. 137
      Zhang, W.; Chai, Y.; Yuan, R.; Chen, S.; Han, J.; Yuan, D. Facile Synthesis of Graphene Hybrid Tube-Like Structure for Simultaneous Detection of Ascorbic Acid, Dopamine, Uric Acid and Tryptophan Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 756, 7 12 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.10.044
    138. 138
      Lv, M.; Mei, T.; Zhang, C.; Wang, X. Selective and Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Dopamine Based on Water-Soluble Porphyrin Functionalized Graphene Nanocomposites RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 9261 9270 DOI: 10.1039/c3ra47234e
    139. 139
      Zhang, Y.; Xia, Z.; Liu, H.; Yang, M.; Lin, L.; Li, Q. Hemin Graphene Oxide-Pristine Carbon Nanotubes Complexes with Intrinsic Peroxidase-Like Activity for the Detection of H2O2 and Simultaneous Determination for Trp, AA, DA, and UA Sens. Actuators, B 2013, 188, 496 501 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.07.010
    140. 140
      Pandikumar, A.; Thien Soon How, G.; See, T. P.; Omar, F. S.; Jayabal, S.; Zangeneh Kamali, K.; Yusoff, N.; Jamil, A.; Ramaraj, R.; Abraham John, S. Graphene and Its Nanocomposite Material Based Electrochemical Sensor Platform for Dopamine RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 63296 63323 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA13777A
    141. 141
      Min, S. K.; Kim, W. Y.; Cho, Y.; Kim, K. S. Fast DNA Sequencing with a Graphene-Based Nanochannel Device Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 162 165 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2010.283
    142. 142
      Zhu, C.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. Graphene and Graphene-Like 2D Materials for Optical Biosensing and Bioimaging: A Review 2D Mater. 2015, 2, 032004 DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/2/3/032004
    143. 143
      Liu, Y.; Dong, X.; Chen, P. Biological and Chemical Sensors Based on Graphene Materials Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2283 2307 DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15270J
    144. 144
      Green, N. S.; Norton, M. L. Interactions of DNA with graphene and sensing applications of graphene field-effect transistor devices: A review Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 853, 127 142 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.023
    145. 145
      Lu, C. H.; Yang, H. H.; Zhu, C. L.; Chen, X.; Chen, G. N. A Graphene Platform for Sensing Biomolecules Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4785 4787 DOI: 10.1002/anie.200901479
    146. 146
      Bonanni, A.; Pumera, M. Graphene Platform for Hairpin-DNA Based Impedimetric Genosensing ACS Nano 2011, 5, 2356 2361 DOI: 10.1021/nn200091p
    147. 147
      Loo, A. H.; Bonanni, A.; Pumera, M. An Insight into the Hybridization Mechanism of Hairpin DNA Physically Immobilized on Chemically Modified Graphenes Analyst 2013, 138, 467 471 DOI: 10.1039/C2AN36199J
    148. 148
      Giovanni, M.; Bonanni, A.; Pumera, M. Detection of DNA Hybridization on Chemically Modified Graphene Platforms Analyst 2012, 137, 580 583 DOI: 10.1039/C1AN15910K
    149. 149
      Loo, A. H.; Bonanni, A.; Ambrosi, A.; Poh, H. L.; Pumera, M. Impedimetric Immunoglobulin G Immunosensor Based on Chemically Modified Graphenes Nanoscale 2012, 4, 921 925 DOI: 10.1039/C2NR11492E
    150. 150
      Bonanni, A.; Chua, C. K.; Zhao, G.; Sofer, Z.; Pumera, M. Inherently Electroactive Graphene Oxide Nanoplatelets As Labels for Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Detection ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8546 8551 DOI: 10.1021/nn301359y
    151. 151
      Goedert, M.; Spillantini, M. G. A Century of Alzheimer’s Disease Science 2006, 314, 777 781 DOI: 10.1126/science.1132814
    152. 152
      Li, Q.; Liu, L.; Zhang, S.; Xu, M.; Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Besenbacher, F.; Dong, M. Modulating Aβ33–42 Peptide Assembly by Graphene Oxide Chem. - Eur. J. 2014, 20, 7236 7240 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201402022
    153. 153
      Mahmoudi, M.; Akhavan, O.; Ghavami, M.; Rezaee, F.; Ghiasi, S. M. A. Graphene Oxide Strongly Inhibits Amyloid Beta Fibrillation Nanoscale 2012, 4, 7322 7325 DOI: 10.1039/c2nr31657a
    154. 154
      Wang, J.; Cao, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, L.; Dong, M. Size Effect of Graphene Oxide on Modulating Amyloid Peptide Assembly Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 9632 9637 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201500577
    155. 155
      Wahid, M. H.; Stroeher, U. H.; Eroglu, E.; Chen, X.; Vimalanathan, K.; Raston, C. L.; Boulos, R. A. Aqueous Based Synthesis of Antimicrobial-Decorated Graphene J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 443, 88 96 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.043
    156. 156
      Zhou, L.; Jiang, H.; Wei, S.; Ge, X.; Zhou, J.; Shen, J. High-Efficiency Loading of Hypocrellin B on Graphene Oxide for Photodynamic Therapy Carbon 2012, 50, 5594 5604 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.08.013
    157. 157
      Chowdhury, S. M.; Surhland, C.; Sanchez, Z.; Chaudhary, P.; Kumar, M. A. S.; Lee, S.; Peña, L. A.; Waring, M.; Sitharaman, B.; Naidu, M. Graphene Nanoribbons as a Drug Delivery Agent for Lucanthone Mediated Therapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme Nanomedicine 2015, 11, 109 118 DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2014.08.001
    158. 158
      Rahmanian, N.; Hamishehkar, H.; Dolatabadid, J. E. N.; Arsalani, N. Nano Graphene Oxide: A Novel Carrier for Oral Delivery of Flavonoids Colloids Surf., B 2014, 123, 331 338 DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.09.036
    159. 159
      Liu, Z.; Robinson, J. T.; Sun, X.; Dai, H. PEGylated Nanographene Oxide for Delivery of Water-Insoluble Cancer Drugs J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10876 10877 DOI: 10.1021/ja803688x
    160. 160
      Georgakilas, V.; Kouloumpis, A.; Gournis, D.; Bourlinos, A.; Trapalis, C.; Zboril, R. Tuning the Dispersibility of Carbon Nanostructures from Organophilic to Hydrophilic: Towards the Preparation of New Multipurpose Carbon-Based Hybrids Chem. - Eur. J. 2013, 19, 12884 12891 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201301200
    161. 161
      Balcioglu, M.; Rana, M.; Yigit, M. V. Doxorubicin Loading on Graphene Oxide, Iron Oxide and Gold Nanoparticle Hybrid J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 6187 6193 DOI: 10.1039/c3tb20992j
    162. 162
      Koninti, R. K.; Sengupta, A.; Gavvala, K.; Ballav, N.; Hazra, P. Loading of an Anti-Cancer Drug onto Graphene Oxide and Subsequent Release to DNA/RNA: A Direct Optical Detection Nanoscale 2014, 6, 2937 2944 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr06081k
    163. 163
      Chia, J. S. Y.; Tan, M. T. T.; Khiew, P. S.; Chin, J. K.; Siong, C. W. A Bio-Electrochemical Sensing Platform for Glucose Based on Irreversible, Non-Covalent pi–pi Functionalization of Graphene Produced via a Novel, Green Synthesis Method Sens. Actuators, B 2015, 210, 558 565 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.01.023
    164. 164
      Kong, N.; Liua, J.; Kong, Q.; Wang, R.; Barrow, C. J.; Yang, W. Graphene Modified Gold Electrode via Stacking Interaction for Analysis of Cu2+ and Pb2+ Sens. Actuators, B 2013, 178, 426 433 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.01.009
    165. 165
      Shen, X.; Liu, Y.; Pang, Y.; Yao, W. Conjugation of Graphene on Au Surface by π–π Interaction and Click Chemistry Electrochem. Commun. 2013, 30, 13 16 DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2013.01.025
    166. 166
      Zhang, S.; Tang, S.; Lei, J.; Dong, H.; Ju, H. Functionalization of Graphene Nanoribbons with Porphyrin for Electrocatalysis and Amperometric Biosensing J. Electroanal. Chem. 2011, 656, 285 288 DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.10.005
    167. 167
      Srinivasan, S.; Je, S. H.; Back, S.; Barin, G.; Buyukcakir, O.; Guliyev, R.; Jung, Y.; Coskun, A. Ordered Supramolecular Gels Based on Graphene Oxide and Tetracationic Cyclophanes Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2725 2729 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201304334
    168. 168
      Georgakilas, V.; Perman, J. A.; Tucek, J.; Zboril, R. Broad Family of Carbon Nanoallotropes – Classification, Chemistry and Advanced Architecture of Fullerene, Nanotube, Graphene and their Relatives Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 4744 4822 DOI: 10.1021/cr500304f
    169. 169
      Shao, Q.; Tang, J.; Lin, Y.; Li, J.; Qin, F.; Yuan, J.; Qin, L. C. Carbon Nanotube Spaced Graphene Aerogels with Enhanced Capacitance in Aqueous and Ionic Liquid Electrolytes J. Power Sources 2015, 278, 751 759 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.052
    170. 170
      Georgakilas, V.; Demeslis, A.; Ntararas, E.; Kouloumpis, A.; Dimos, K.; Gournis, D.; Kocman, M.; Otyepka, M.; Zboril, R. Hydrophilic Nanotube Supported Graphene-Water Dispersible Carbon Superstructure with Excellent Conductivity Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 1481 1487 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201403801
    171. 171
      Tang, C.; Long, G.; Hu, X.; Wong, K.; Lau, W. M.; Fan, M.; Mei, J.; Xu, T.; Wang, B.; Huid, D. Conductive Polymer Nanocomposites with Hierarchical Multi-Scale Structures via Self-Assembly of Carbon-Nanotubes on Graphene on Polymer-microspheres Nanoscale 2014, 6, 7877 7888 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr06056j
    172. 172
      Li, G.; Shrotriya, V.; Huang, J. S.; Yao, Y.; Moriarty, T.; Emery, K.; Yang, Y. High-Efficiency Solution Processable Polymer Photovoltaic Cells by Self-Organization of Polymer Blends Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 864 868 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1500
    173. 173
      Kim, J. Y.; Lee, K.; Coates, N. E.; Moses, D.; Nguyen, T. Q.; Dante, M.; Heeger, A. J. Efficient Tandem Polymer Solar Cells Fabricated by All-Solution Processing Science 2007, 317, 222 225 DOI: 10.1126/science.1141711
    174. 174
      Guenes, S.; Neugebauer, H.; Sariciftci, N. S. Conjugated Polymer-Based Organic Solar Cells Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1324 1338 DOI: 10.1021/cr050149z
    175. 175
      Kim, Y.; Cook, S.; Tuladhar, S. M.; Choulis, S. A.; Nelson, J.; Durrant, R. J.; Bradley, D. D. C.; Giles, M.; Mcculloch, I.; Ha, C. S. A Strong Regioregularity Effect in Self-Organizing Conjugated Polymer Films and High-Efficiency Polythiophene: Fullerene Solar Cells Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 197 203 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1574
    176. 176
      Qu, S.; Li, M.; Xie, L.; Huang, X.; Yang, J.; Wang, N.; Yang, S. Noncovalent Functionalization of Graphene Attaching [6,6]-Phenyl-C61-butyric Acid Methyl Ester (PCBM) and Application as Electron Extraction Layer of Polymer Solar Cells ACS Nano 2013, 7, 4070 4081 DOI: 10.1021/nn4001963
    177. 177
      Gan, T.; Hu, C.; Sun, Z.; Hu, S. Facile Synthesis of Water-Soluble Fullerene–Graphene Oxide Composites for Electrodeposition of Phosphotungstic Acid-Based Electrocatalysts Electrochim. Acta 2013, 111, 738 745 DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.059
    178. 178
      Ba, H.; Podila, S.; Liu, Y.; Mua, X.; Nhuta, J. M.; Papaefthimiou, V.; Zafeiratos, S.; Granger, P.; Huu, C. P. Nanodiamond Decorated Few-Layer Graphene Composite as Anefficient Metal-Free Dehydrogenation Catalyst for Styrene Production Catal. Today 2015, 249, 167 175 DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.10.029
    179. 179
      Pastor, I. R.; Fernandez, G. R.; Rizo, H. V.; Terrones, M.; Gullon, I. M. Towards the Understanding of the Graphene Oxide Structure: How to Control the Formation of Humic- and Fulvic-Like Oxidized Debris Carbon 2015, 84, 299 309 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.027
    180. 180
      Rourke, J. P.; Pandey, P. A.; Moore, J. J.; Bates, M.; Kinloch, I. A.; Young, R. J.; Wilson, N. R. The Real Graphene Oxide Revealed: Stripping the Oxidative Debris from the Graphene Like Sheets Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 3173 3177 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201007520
    181. 181
      Thomas, H. R.; Valles, C.; Young, R. J.; Kinloch, I. A.; Wilson, N. R.; Rourke, J. P. Identifying the Fluorescence of Graphene Oxide J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 338 342 DOI: 10.1039/C2TC00234E
    182. 182
      Bonanni, A.; Ambrosi, A.; Chua, C. K.; Pumera, M. Oxidation Debris in Graphene Oxide Is Responsible for Its Inherent Electroactivity ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4197 4204 DOI: 10.1021/nn404255q
    183. 183
      Coluci, V. R.; Martinez, D. S. T.; Honório, J. G.; de Faria, A. F.; Morales, D. A.; Skaf, M. S.; Alves, O. L.; Umbuzeiro, G. A. Noncovalent Interaction with Graphene Oxide: The Crucial Role of Oxidative Debris J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 2187 2193 DOI: 10.1021/jp409501g
    184. 184
      Gupta, A.; Sakthivel, T.; Seal, S. Recent Development in 2D Materials beyond Graphene Prog. Mater. Sci. 2015, 73, 44 126 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.002
    185. 185
      Wang, Q. H.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J. N.; Strano, M. S. Electronics and Optoelectronics of Two Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 699 712 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2012.193
    186. 186
      Splendiani, A.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Kim, J.; Chim, C. Y.; Galli, G.; Wang, F. Emerging Photoluminescence in Monolayer MoS2 Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1271 1275 DOI: 10.1021/nl903868w
    187. 187
      Thripuranthaka, M.; Late, D. J. Temperature Dependent Phonon Shifts in Single-Layer WS2 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 1158 1163 DOI: 10.1021/am404847d
    188. 188
      Miremadi, B. K.; Morrison, S. R. High Activity Catalyst from Exfoliated MoS2 J. Catal. 1987, 103, 334 345 DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(87)90125-4
    189. 189
      Novoselov, K. S.; Jiang, D.; Schedin, F.; Booth, T. J.; Khotkevich, V. V.; Morozov, S. V.; Geim, A. K. Two-Dimensional Atomic Crystals Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102, 10451 10453 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502848102
    190. 190
      Coleman, J. N.; Lotya, M.; O’Neill, A.; Bergin, S. D.; King, P. J.; Khan, U.; Young, K.; Gaucher, A.; De, S.; Smith, R. J. Two-Dimensional Nanosheets Produced by Liquid Exfoliation of Layered Materials Science 2011, 331, 568 571 DOI: 10.1126/science.1194975
    191. 191
      Song, S. H.; Kim, B. H.; Choe, D. H.; Kim, J.; Kim, D. C.; Lee, D. J.; Kim, J. M.; Chang, K. J.; Jeon, S. Bandgap Widening of Phase Quilted, 2D MoS2 by Oxidative Intercalation Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3152 3158 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201500649
    192. 192
      Zhan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Najmaei, S.; Ajayan, P. M.; Lou, J. Large-Area Vapor-Phase Growth and Characterization of MoS2 Atomic Layers on a SiO2 Substrate Small 2012, 8, 966 971 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201102654
    193. 193
      Lee, Y. H.; Zhang, X. Q.; Zhang, W. J.; Chang, M. T.; Lin, C. T.; Chang, K. D.; Yu, Y. C.; Wang, J. T. W.; Chang, C. S.; Li, L. J. Synthesis of Large-Area MoS2 Atomic Layers with Chemical Vapor Deposition Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2320 2325 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201104798
    194. 194
      Zhang, Y.; Chang, T. R.; Zhou, B.; Cui, Y. T.; Yan, H.; Liu, Z.; Schmitt, F.; Lee, J.; Moore, R.; Chen, Y. Direct Observation of the Transition from Indirect to Direct Bandgap in Atomically Thin Epitaxial MoSe2 Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 9, 111 115 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.277
    195. 195
      Liu, Z.; Song, L.; Zhao, S.; Huang, J.; Ma, L.; Zhang, J.; Lou, J.; Ajayan, P. M. Direct Growth of Graphene/Hexagonal Boron Nitride Stacked Layers Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2032 2037 DOI: 10.1021/nl200464j
    196. 196
      Yu, L.; Lee, Y. H.; Ling, X.; Santos, E. J. G.; Shin, Y. C.; Lin, Y.; Dubey, M.; Kaxiras, E.; Kong, J.; Wang, H. Graphene/MoS2 Hybrid Technology for Large-Scale Two-Dimensional Electronics Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 3055 3063 DOI: 10.1021/nl404795z
    197. 197
      Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Xie, L.; Liang, Y.; Hong, G.; Dai, H. MoS2 Nanoparticles Grown on Graphene: An Advanced Catalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7296 7299 DOI: 10.1021/ja201269b
    198. 198
      Roy, K.; Padmanabhan, M.; Goswami, S.; Sai, T. P.; Kaushal, S.; Ghosh, A. Optically Active Heterostructures of Graphene and Ultrathin MoS2 Solid State Commun. 2013, 175, 35 42 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2013.09.021
    199. 199
      Roy, K.; Padmanabhan, M.; Goswami, S.; Sai, T. P.; Ramalingam, G.; Raghavan, S.; Ghosh, A. Graphene–MoS2 Hybrid Structures for Multifunctional Photoresponsive Memory Devices Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 826 830 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.206
    200. 200
      Loan, P. T. K.; Zhang, W.; Lin, C. T.; Wei, K. H.; Li, L. J.; Chen, C. H. Graphene/MoS2 Heterostructures for Ultrasensitive Detection of DNA Hybridisation Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4838 4844 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201401084
    201. 201
      Zeng, S.; Hu, S.; Xia, J.; Anderson, T.; Dinh, X. Q.; Meng, X. M.; Coquet, P.; Yong, K. T. Graphene–MoS2 Hybrid Nanostructures Enhanced Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensors Sens. Actuators, B 2015, 207, 801 810 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.10.124
    202. 202
      Meng, J.; Song, H. D.; Li, C. Z.; Jin, Y.; Tang, L.; Liu, D.; Liao, Z. M.; Xiu, F.; Yu, D. P. Lateral Graphene p-n Junctions Formed by Graphene/MoS2 Hybrid Interface Nanoscale 2015, 7, 11611 11619 DOI: 10.1039/C5NR02552D
    203. 203
      Shiva, K.; Matte, H. S. S. R.; Rajendra, H. B.; Bhattacharyya, A. J.; Rao, C. N. R. Employing Synergistic Interactions Between Few-Layer WS2 and Reduced Graphene Oxide to Improve Lithium Storage, Cyclability and Rate Capability of Li-Ion Batteries Nano Energy 2013, 2, 787 793 DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.02.001
    204. 204
      Roy, T.; Tosun, M.; Kang, J. S.; Sachid, A. B.; Desai, S. B.; Hettick, M.; Hu, C. C.; Javey, A. Field-Effect Transistors Built from All Two-Dimensional Material Components ACS Nano 2014, 8, 6259 6264 DOI: 10.1021/nn501723y
    205. 205
      Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, G.; Zhu, H.; Guo, S.; Su, D.; Lu, G.; Sun, S. Tuning Nanoparticle Structure and Surface Strain for Catalysis Optimization J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7734 7739 DOI: 10.1021/ja5030172
    206. 206
      Liu, X.; Sui, Y. H.; Meng, C. G.; Han, Y. Tuning the Reactivity of Ru Nanoparticles by Defect Engineering of the Reduced Graphene Oxide Support RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 22230 22240 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA02900C
    207. 207
      Duan, J.; Chen, S.; Dai, S.; Qiao, S. Z. Shape Control of Mn3O4 Nanoparticles on Nitrogen-Doped Graphene for Enhanced Oxygen Reduction Activity Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2072 2078 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201302940
    208. 208
      Li, W.; Wang, F.; Feng, S.; Wang, J.; Sun, Z.; Li, B.; Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Elzatahry, A. A.; Xia, Y. Sol-Gel Design Strategy for Ultradispersed TiO2 Nanoparticles on Graphene for High-Performance Lithium Ion Batteries J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18300 18303 DOI: 10.1021/ja4100723
    209. 209
      Guo, S.; Zhang, S.; Wu, L.; Sun, S. Co/CoO Nanoparticles Assembled on Graphene for Electrochemical Reduction of Oxygen Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 11770 11773 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201206152
    210. 210
      Duy-Thach, P.; Chung, G. S. A Novel Pd Nanocube-Graphene Hybrid for Hydrogen Detection Sens. Actuators, B 2014, 199, 354 360 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.04.013
    211. 211
      Jabeen, H.; Kemp, K. C.; Chandra, V. Synthesis of Nano Zerovalent Iron Nanoparticles - Graphene Composite for the Treatment of Lead Contaminated Water J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 130, 429 435 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.022
    212. 212
      Seema, H.; Kemp, K. C.; Chandra, V.; Kim, K. S. Graphene-SnO2 Composites for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue under Sunlight Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 355705 DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/35/355705
    213. 213
      Jin, S.; Chen, M.; Dong, H.; He, B.; Lu, H.; Su, L.; Dai, W.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X. Stable Silver Nanoclusters Electrochemically Deposited on Nitrogen-Doped Graphene as Efficient Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction J. Power Sources 2015, 274, 1173 1179 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.098
    214. 214
      Hui, K. S.; Hui, K. N.; Dinh, D. A.; Tsang, C. H.; Cho, Y. R.; Zhou, W.; Hong, X.; Chun, H. H. Green Synthesis of Dimension-Controlled Silver Nanoparticle-Graphene Oxide with in Situ Ultrasonication Acta Mater. 2014, 64, 326 332 DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.045
    215. 215
      Moussa, S.; Siamaki, A. R.; Gupton, B. F.; El-Shall, M. S. Pd-Partially Reduced Graphene Oxide Catalysts (Pd/PRGO): Laser Synthesis of Pd Nanoparticles Supported on PRGO Nanosheets for Carbon-Carbon Cross Coupling Reactions ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 145 154 DOI: 10.1021/cs200497e
    216. 216
      Liu, G.; Wang, Y.; Pu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Cheng, L.; Jiao, Z. One-Step Synthesis of High Conductivity Silver Nanoparticle-Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite Films by Electron Beam Irradiation Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 349, 570 575 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.044
    217. 217
      Haider, M. S.; Badejo, A. C.; Shao, G. N.; Imran, S. M.; Abbas, N.; Chai, Y. G.; Hussain, M.; Kim, H. T. Sequential Repetitive Chemical Reduction Technique to Study Size-Property Relationships of Graphene Attached Ag Nanoparticle Solid State Sci. 2015, 44, 1 9 DOI: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2015.03.024
    218. 218
      Shi, J.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.; Su, Q.; Zhang, J.; Du, G. Sonochemical Synthesis of CuS/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites with Enhanced Absorption and Photocatalytic Performance Mater. Lett. 2014, 126, 220 223 DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.04.051
    219. 219
      Thangaraju, D.; Karthikeyan, R.; Prakash, N.; Babuc, S. M.; Hayakawa, Y. Growth and Optical Properties of Cu2ZnSnS4 Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 15031 15041 DOI: 10.1039/C5DT01542A
    220. 220
      Bera, R.; Kundu, S.; Patra, A. 2D Hybrid Nanostructure of Reduced Graphene Oxide-CdS Nanosheet for Enhanced Photocatalysis ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 13251 13259 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b03800
    221. 221
      Wang, Z.; Shi, G.; Zhang, F.; Xia, J.; Gui, R.; Yang, M.; Bi, S.; Xia, L.; Li, Y.; Xia, L. Amphoteric Surfactant Promoted Three-Dimensional Assembly of Graphene Micro/Nanoclusters to Accomodate Pt Nanoparticles for Methanol Oxidation Electrochim. Acta 2015, 160, 288 295 DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.009
    222. 222
      Atar, N.; Eren, T.; Yola, M. L.; Gerengi, H.; Wang, S. Fe@Ag Nanoparticles Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide as Ultrahigh Capacity Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Battery Ionics 2015, 21, 3185 3192 DOI: 10.1007/s11581-015-1520-1
    223. 223
      Fonsaca, J. E. S.; Elias, A. L.; Domingues, S. H.; Oliveira, M. M.; Endo, M.; Orth, E. S.; Terrones, M.; Zarbin, A. J. G. Graphene Nanoribbons Inducing Cube-Shaped Ag Nanoparticle Assemblies Carbon 2015, 93, 800 811 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.098
    224. 224
      Toth, P. S.; Velický, M.; Ramasse, Q. M.; Kepaptsoglou, D. M.; Dryfe, R. A. W. Symmetric and Asymmetric Decoration of Graphene: Bimetal-Graphene Sandwiches Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 2899 2909 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201500277
    225. 225
      Xiao, F.-X.; Miao, J.; Liu, B. Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly of CdS Quantum Dots/Graphene Nanosheets Hybrid Films for Photoelectrochemical and Photocatalytic Applications J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1559 1569 DOI: 10.1021/ja411651e
    226. 226
      Zhou, R.; Qiao, S. Z. Silver/Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Interaction and Its Effect on Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 5868 5873 DOI: 10.1021/cm502260m
    227. 227
      Kemp, K. C.; Vimlesh, C.; Muhammad, S.; Kim, K. S. Reversible CO2 Adsorption by an Activated Nitrogen Doped Graphene/Polyaniline Material Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 235703 DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/23/235703
    228. 228
      Park, S.; Hu, Y.; Hwang, J. O.; Lee, E.-S.; Casabianca, L. B.; Cai, W.; Potts, J. R.; Ha, H.-W.; Chen, S.; Oh, J. Chemical Structures of Hydrazine-Treated Graphene Oxide and Generation of Aromatic Nitrogen Doping Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 638 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1643
    229. 229
      Marquardt, D.; Beckert, F.; Pennetreau, F.; Tölle, F.; Mülhaupt, R.; Riant, O.; Hermans, S.; Barthel, J.; Janiak, C. Hybrid Materials of Platinum Nanoparticles and Thiol-Functionalized Graphene Derivatives Carbon 2014, 66, 285 294 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.002
    230. 230
      Cui, L.; Wu, J.; Ju, H. Synthesis of Bismuth-Nanoparticle-Enriched Nanoporous Carbon on Graphene for Efficient Electrochemical Analysis of Heavy-Metal Ions Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 11525 11530 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201500512
    231. 231
      Wei, W.; Wang, G.; Yang, S.; Feng, X. L.; Mullen, K. Efficient Coupling of Nanoparticles to Electrochemically Exfoliated Graphene J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5576 5581 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b02284
    232. 232
      Lee, W. C.; Kim, K.; Park, J.; Koo, J.; Jeong, H. Y.; Lee, H.; Weitz, D. A.; Zettl, A.; Takeuchi, S. Graphene-Templated Directional Growth of an Inorganic Nanowire Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 423 428 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.36
    233. 233
      Yu, S. U.; Park, B.; Cho, Y.; Hyun, S.; Kim, J. K.; Kim, K. S. Simultaneous Visualization of Graphene Grain Boundaries and Wrinkles with Structural Information by Gold Deposition ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8662 8668 DOI: 10.1021/nn503550d
    234. 234
      Duong, D. L.; Han, G. H.; Lee, S. M.; Gunes, F.; Kim, E. S.; Kim, S. T.; Kim, H.; Ta, Q. H.; So, K. P.; Yoon, S. J. Probing Graphene Grain Boundaries with Optical Microscopy Nature 2012, 490, 235 240 DOI: 10.1038/nature11562
    235. 235
      Yu, S. U.; Cho, Y.; Park, B.; Kim, N.; Youn, I. S.; Son, M.; Kim, J. K.; Choi, H. C.; Kim, K. S. Fast benchtop visualization of graphene grain boundaries using adhesive properties of defects Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 5474 5476 DOI: 10.1039/c3cc42464b
    236. 236
      Kim, D. W.; Kim, Y. H.; Jeong, H. S.; Jung, H. T. Direct Visualization of Large-Area Graphene Domains and Boundaries by Optical Birefringency Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 7, 29 34 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.198
    237. 237
      Zhang, H. M.; Yu, X. Z.; Guo, D.; Qu, B. H.; Zhang, M.; Li, Q. H.; Wang, T. H. Synthesis of Bacteria Promoted Reduced Graphene Oxide-Nickel Sulfide Networks for Advanced Supercapacitors ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 7335 7340 DOI: 10.1021/am401680m
    238. 238
      Shi, Y.; Wang, J. Z.; Chou, S. L.; Wexler, D.; Li, H. J.; Ozawa, K.; Liu, H. K.; Wu, Y. P. Hollow Structured Li3VO4 Wrapped with Graphene Nanosheets in Situ Prepared by a One-Pot Template-Free Method as an Anode for Lithium-Ion Batteries Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 4715 4720 DOI: 10.1021/nl402237u
    239. 239
      Hu, J. T.; Zheng, J. X.; Tian, L. L.; Duan, Y. D.; Lin, L. P.; Cui, S. H.; Peng, H.; Liu, T. C.; Guo, H.; Wang, X. W. A Core-Shell Nanohollow-γ-Fe2O3@Graphene Hybrid Prepared through the Kirkendall Process as a High Performance Anode Material for Lithium Ion Batteries Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 7855 7858 DOI: 10.1039/C5CC01195G
    240. 240
      Sengar, S. K.; Mehta, B. R.; Kumar, R.; Singh, V. In-Flight Gas Phase Growth of Metal/Multilayer Graphene Core Shell Nanoparticles with Controllable Sizes Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2814 DOI: 10.1038/srep02814
    241. 241
      Moon, H.; Kumar, D.; Kim, H.; Sim, C.; Chang, J. H.; Kim, J. M.; Kim, H.; Lim, D. K. Amplified Photoacoustic Performance and Enhanced Photothermal Stability of Reduced Graphene Oxide Coated Gold Nanorods for Sensitive Photo acoustic Imaging ACS Nano 2015, 9, 2711 2719 DOI: 10.1021/nn506516p
    242. 242
      Si, Y.; Samulski, E. T. Exfoliated Graphene Separated by Platinum Nanoparticles Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 6792 6797 DOI: 10.1021/cm801356a
    243. 243
      Buglione, L.; Bonanni, A.; Ambrosi, A.; Pumera, M. Gold Nanospacers Greatly Enhance the Capacitance of Electrochemically Reduced Graphene ChemPlusChem 2012, 77, 71 73 DOI: 10.1002/cplu.201100016
    244. 244
      Wu, Z.-S.; Ren, W.; Wen, L.; Gao, L.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, G.; Li, F.; Cheng, H.-M. Graphene Anchored with Co3O4 Nanoparticles as Anode of Lithium IonBatteries with Enhanced Reversible Capacity and Cyclic Performance ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3187 3194 DOI: 10.1021/nn100740x
    245. 245
      Liu, Y.; Wang, R.; Yan, X. Synergistic Effect between Ultra-Small Nickel Hydroxide Nanoparticles and Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets for the Application in High-Performance Asymmetric Supercapacitor Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11095 DOI: 10.1038/srep11095
    246. 246
      Tiwari, J. N.; Kemp, K. C.; Nath, K.; Tiwari, R. N.; Nam, H.-G.; Kim, K. S. Interconnected Pt-Nanodendrite/DNA/Reduced-Graphene-Oxide Hybrid Showing Remarkable Oxygen Reduction Activity and Stability ACS Nano 2013, 7, 9223 9231 DOI: 10.1021/nn4038404
    247. 247
      Tiwari, J. N.; Nath, K.; Kumar, S.; Tiwari, R. N.; Kemp, K. C.; Le, N. H.; Youn, D. H.; Lee, J. S.; Kim, K. S. Stable Platinum Nanoclusters on Genomic DNA-Graphene Oxide with a High Oxygen Reduction Reaction Activity Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2221 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3221
    248. 248
      Huang, Y. X.; Xie, J. F.; Zhang, X.; Xiong, L.; Yu, H. Q. Reduced Graphene Oxide Supported Palladium Nanoparticles via Photoassisted Citrate Reduction for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activities ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 15795 15801 DOI: 10.1021/am504664r
    249. 249
      Yin, H. J.; Tang, H. J.; Wang, D.; Gao, Y.; Tang, Z. Y. Facile Synthesis of Surfactant-Free Au Cluster/Graphene Hybrids for High-Performance Oxygen Reduction Reaction ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8288 8297 DOI: 10.1021/nn302984x
    250. 250
      Li, Y.; Yu, Y.; Wang, J.-G.; Song, J.; Li, Q.; Dong, M.; Liu, C.-J. CO Oxidation over Graphene Supported Palladium Catalyst Appl. Catal., B 2012, 125, 189 196 DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.023
    251. 251
      Grayfer, E. D.; Kibis, L. S.; Stadnichenko, A. I.; Vilkov, O. Y.; Boronin, A. I.; Slavinskaya, E. M.; Stonkus, O. A.; Fedorov, V. E. Ultradisperse Pt Nanoparticles Anchored on Defect Sites in Oxygen-Free Few-Layer Graphene and Their Catalytic Properties in CO Oxidation Carbon 2015, 89, 290 299 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.050
    252. 252
      Zhang, C.; Lv, W.; Yang, Q.; Liu, Y. Graphene Supported Nanoparticles of Pt–Ni for CO Oxidation Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 7795 7800 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.03.131
    253. 253
      Qu, L. T.; Liu, Y.; Baek, J. B.; Dai, L. M. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene as Efficient Metal-Free Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction in Fuel Cells ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1321 1326 DOI: 10.1021/nn901850u
    254. 254
      Yang, Z.; Yao, Z.; Li, G. F.; Fang, G. Y.; Nie, H. G.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, X. M.; Chen, X.; Huang, S. M. Sulfur-Doped Graphene as an Efficient Metal-free Cathode Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction ACS Nano 2012, 6, 205 211 DOI: 10.1021/nn203393d
    255. 255
      Zhang, C. Z.; Mahmood, N.; Yin, H.; Liu, F.; Hou, Y. L. Synthesis of Phosphorus-Doped Graphene and its Multifunctional Applications for Oxygen Reduction Reaction and Lithium Ion Batteries Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4932 4937 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201301870
    256. 256
      Wang, L.; Ambrosi, A.; Pumera, M. ″Metal-Free″ Catalytic Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Heteroatom-Doped Graphene is Caused by Trace Metal Impurities Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 13818 13821 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201309171
    257. 257
      Wang, L.; Ambrosi, A.; Pumera, M. Could Carbonaceous Impurities in Reduced Graphenes be Responsible for Some of Their Extraordinary Electrocatalytic Activities? Chem. - Asian J. 2013, 8, 1200 1204 DOI: 10.1002/asia.201300122
    258. 258
      Yang, J.; Voiry, D.; Ahn, S. J.; Kang, D.; Kim, A. Y.; Chhowalla, M.; Shin, H. S. Two-Dimensional Hybrid Nanosheets of Tungsten Disulfide and Reduced Graphene Oxide as Catalysts for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 13751 13754 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201307475
    259. 259
      Peng, S. J.; Li, L. L.; Han, X. P.; Sun, W. P.; Srinivasan, M.; Mhaisalkar, S. G.; Cheng, F. Y.; Yan, Q. Y.; Chen, J.; Ramakrishna, S. Cobalt Sulfide Nanosheet/Graphene/Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites as Flexible Electrodes for Hydrogen Evolution Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 12594 12599 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201408876
    260. 260
      He, C. Y.; Tao, J. Z. Synthesis of Nanostructured Clean Surface Molybdenum Carbides on Graphene Sheets as Efficient and Stable Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Catalysts Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 8323 8325 DOI: 10.1039/C5CC01240F
    261. 261
      Youn, D. H.; Han, S.; Kim, J. Y.; Kim, J. Y.; Park, H.; Choi, S. H.; Lee, J. S. Highly Active and Stable Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysts Based on Molybdenum Compounds on Carbon Nanotube-Graphene Hybrid Support ACS Nano 2014, 8, 5164 5173 DOI: 10.1021/nn5012144
    262. 262
      Bai, S.; Wang, C. M.; Deng, M. S.; Gong, M.; Bai, Y.; Jiang, J.; Xiong, Y. J. Surface Polarization Matters: Enhancing the Hydrogen-Evolution Reaction by Shrinking Pt Shells in Pt-Pd-Graphene Stack Structures Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 12120 12124 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201406468
    263. 263
      Yan, H. J.; Tian, C. G.; Wang, L.; Wu, A. P.; Meng, M. C.; Zhao, L.; Fu, H. G. Phosphorus-Modified Tungsten Nitride/Reduced Graphene Oxide as a High-Performance, Non-Noble-Metal Electrocatalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6325 6329 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201501419
    264. 264
      Chen, Y.; Zhu, Q. L.; Tsumori, N.; Xu, Q. Immobilizing Highly Catalytically Active Noble Metal Nanoparticles on Reduced Graphene Oxide: A Non-Noble Metal Sacrificial Approach J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 106 109 DOI: 10.1021/ja511511q
    265. 265
      Yang, J. M.; Wang, S. A.; Sun, C. L.; Ger, M. D. Synthesis of size-selected Pt Nanoparticles Supported on Sulfonated Graphene with Polyvinyl Alcohol for Methanol Oxidation in Alkaline Solutions J. Power Sources 2014, 254, 298 305 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.120
    266. 266
      Chen, Y.; Yang, J.; Yang, Y.; Peng, Z.; Li, J.; Mei, T.; Wang, J.; Hao, M.; Chen, Y.; Xiong, W. A Facile Strategy to Synthesize Three-Dimensional Pd@Pt Core-Shell Nanoflowers Supported on Graphene Nanosheets as Enhanced Nanoelectrocatalysts for Methanol Oxidation Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 10490 10493 DOI: 10.1039/C5CC01803J
    267. 267
      Metin, O.; Ho, S. F.; Alp, C.; Can, H.; Mankin, M. N.; Gultekin, M. S.; Chi, M. F.; Sun, S. H. Ni/Pd Core/Shell Nanoparticles Supported on Graphene as a Highly Active and Reusable Catalyst for Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reaction Nano Res. 2013, 6, 10 18 DOI: 10.1007/s12274-012-0276-4
    268. 268
      Putta, C.; Sharavath, V.; Sarkar, S.; Ghosh, S. Palladium Nanoparticles on Beta-Cyclodextrin Functionalised Graphene Nanosheets: A Supramolecular Based Heterogeneous Catalyst for C-C Coupling Reactions under Green Reaction Conditions RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 6652 6660 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA14323J
    269. 269
      Ren, L.; Yang, F.; Wang, C. X.; Li, Y. F.; Liu, H. L.; Tu, Z. Q.; Zhang, L. Q.; Liu, Z. C.; Gao, J. S.; Xu, C. M. Plasma Synthesis of Oxidized Graphene Foam Supporting Pd Nanoparticles as a New Catalyst for One-Pot Synthesis of Dibenzyls RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 63048 63054 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA11060A
    270. 270
      Fang, Y. X.; Wang, E. K. Electrochemical Biosensors on Platforms of Graphene Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9526 9539 DOI: 10.1039/c3cc44735a
    271. 271
      Wu, W.; Liu, Z. H.; Jauregui, L. A.; Yu, Q. K.; Pillai, R.; Cao, H. L.; Bao, J. M.; Chen, Y. P.; Pei, S. S. Wafer-Scale Synthesis of Graphene by Chemical Vapor Deposition and Its Application in Hydrogen Sensing Sens. Actuators, B 2010, 150, 296 300 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2010.06.070
    272. 272
      Li, M.; Bo, X. J.; Zhang, Y. F.; Han, C.; Guo, L. P. One-Pot Ionic Liquid-Assisted Synthesis of Highly Dispersed PtPd Nanoparticles/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites for Nonenzymatic Glucose Detection Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 56, 223 230 DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.01.030
    273. 273
      Mukherji, A.; Seger, B.; Lu, G. Q.; Wang, L. Z. Nitrogen Doped Sr2Ta2O7 Coupled with Graphene Sheets as Photocatalysts for Increased Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production ACS Nano 2011, 5, 3483 3492 DOI: 10.1021/nn102469e
    274. 274
      Li, Q.; Guo, B. D.; Yu, J. G.; Ran, J. R.; Zhang, B. H.; Yan, H. J.; Gong, J. R. Highly Efficient Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production of CdS-Cluster-Decorated Graphene Nanosheets J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10878 10884 DOI: 10.1021/ja2025454
    275. 275
      Meng, F. K.; Li, J. T.; Cushing, S. K.; Zhi, M. J.; Wu, N. Q. Solar Hydrogen Generation by Nanoscale p-n Junction of p-type Molybdenum Disulfide/n-type Nitrogen-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10286 10289 DOI: 10.1021/ja404851s
    276. 276
      Wang, Y.; Yu, J. G.; Xiao, W.; Li, Q. Microwave-Assisted Hydrothermal Synthesis of Graphene Based Au-TiO2 Photocatalysts for Efficient Visible-Light Hydrogen Production J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 3847 3855 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta14908k
    277. 277
      Martin, S. T.; Lee, A. T.; Hoffmann, M. R. Chemical Mechanism of Inorganic Oxidants in the Process – Increased Rates of Degradation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 2567 2573 DOI: 10.1021/es00010a017
    278. 278
      Vinayan, B. P.; Nagar, R.; Ramaprabhu, S. Solar Light Assisted Green Synthesis of Palladium Nanoparticle Decorated Nitrogen Doped Graphene for Hydrogen Storage Application J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 11192 11199 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta12016c
    279. 279
      Tuček, J.; Kemp, K. C.; Kim, K. S.; Zbořil, R. Iron-Oxide-Supported Nanocarbon in Lithium-Ion Batteries, Medical, Catalytic, and Environmental Applications ACS Nano 2014, 8, 7571 7612 DOI: 10.1021/nn501836x
    280. 280
      Kucinskis, G.; Bajars, G.; Kleperis, J. Graphene in Lithium Ion Battery Cathode Materials: A Review J. Power Sources 2013, 240, 66 79 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.160
    281. 281
      Sun, W. W.; Wang, Y. Graphene-Based Nanocomposite Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries Nanoscale 2014, 6, 11528 11552 DOI: 10.1039/C4NR02999B
    282. 282
      Yang, Q.; Liang, Q.; Liu, J.; Liang, S. Q.; Tang, S. S.; Lu, P. J.; Lu, Y. K. Ultrafine MoO2 Nanoparticles Grown on Graphene Sheets as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries Mater. Lett. 2014, 127, 32 35 DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.03.055
    283. 283
      Pan, L.; Zhu, X.-D.; Xie, X.-M.; Liu, Y.-T. Smart Hybridization of TiO2 Nanorods and Fe3O4 Nanoparticles with Pristine Graphene Nanosheets: Hierarchically Nanoengineered Ternary Heterostructures for High-Rate Lithium Storage Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 3341 3350 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201404348
    284. 284
      Kasavajjula, U.; Wang, C. S.; Appleby, A. J. Nano- and Bulk-Silicon-Based Insertion Anodes for Lithium-Ion Secondary Cells J. Power Sources 2007, 163, 1003 1039 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.084
    285. 285
      Zhu, S. M.; Zhu, C. L.; Ma, J.; Meng, Q.; Guo, Z. P.; Yu, Z. Y.; Lu, T.; Li, Y.; Zhang, D.; Lau, W. M. Controlled Fabrication of Si Nanoparticles on Graphene Sheets for Li-Ion Batteries RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 6141 6146 DOI: 10.1039/c3ra22989k
    286. 286
      Hassan, F. M.; Elsayed, A. R.; Chabot, V.; Batmaz, R.; Xiao, X. C.; Chen, Z. W. Subeutectic Growth of Single-Crystal Silicon Nanowires Grown on and Wrapped with Graphene Nanosheets: High-Performance Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Battery ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 13757 13764 DOI: 10.1021/am5032067
    287. 287
      Zhou, M.; Li, X.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Ning, J.; Xiao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Chang, Y.; Zhi, L. High-Performance Silicon Battery Anodes Enabled by Engineering Graphene Assemblies Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 6222 6228 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02697
    288. 288
      Yuan, F. W.; Tuan, H. Y. Scalable Solution-Grown High-Germanium-Nanoparticle-Loading Graphene Nanocomposites as High-Performance Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes: An Example of a Graphene-Based Platform toward Practical Full-Cell Applications Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 2172 2179 DOI: 10.1021/cm5002016
    289. 289
      Zhang, H. W.; Zhou, L.; Noonan, O.; Martin, D. J.; Whittaker, A. K.; Yu, C. Z. Tailoring the Void Size of Iron Oxide@Carbon Yolk-Shell Structure for Optimized Lithium Storage Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4337 4342 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201400178
    290. 290
      Li, Y.; Zhu, C. L.; Lu, T.; Guo, Z. P.; Zhang, D.; Ma, J.; Zhu, S. M. Simple Fabrication of a Fe2O3/Carbon Composite for Use in a High-Performance Lithium Ion Battery Carbon 2013, 52, 565 573 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.015
    291. 291
      Slater, M. D.; Kim, D.; Lee, E.; Johnson, C. S. Sodium-Ion Batteries Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 947 958 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201200691
    292. 292
      Yu, D. Y. W.; Prikhodchenko, P. V.; Mason, C. W.; Batabyal, S. K.; Gun, J.; Sladkevich, S.; Medvedev, A. G.; Lev, O. High-Capacity Antimony Sulphide Nanoparticle-Decorated Graphene Composite as Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2922 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3922
    293. 293
      Xiao, Z. B.; Yang, Z.; Wang, L.; Nie, H. G.; Zhong, M. E.; Lai, Q. Q.; Xu, X. J.; Zhang, L. J.; Huang, S. M. A Lightweight TiO2/Graphene Interlayer, Applied as a Highly Effective Polysulfide Absorbent for Fast, Long-Life Lithium-Sulfur Batteries Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2891 2898 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201405637
    294. 294
      Ryu, W. H.; Yoon, T. H.; Song, S. H.; Jeon, S.; Park, Y. J.; Kim, I. D. Bifunctional Composite Catalysts Using Co3O4 Nanofibers Immobilized on Nonoxidized Graphene Nanoflakes for High-Capacity and Long-Cycle Li-O2 Batteries Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 4190 4197 DOI: 10.1021/nl401868q
    295. 295
      Chandra, V.; Park, J.; Chun, Y.; Lee, J. W.; Hwang, I.-C.; Kim, K. S. Water Dispersible Magnetite-Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites for Arsenic Removal ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3979 3986 DOI: 10.1021/nn1008897
    296. 296
      Hu, Y.; Jensen, J. O.; Zhang, W.; Huang, Y. J.; Cleemann, L. N.; Xing, W.; Bjerrum, N. J.; Li, Q. F. Direct Synthesis of Fe3C-Functionalized Graphene by High Temperature Autoclave Pyrolysis for Oxygen Reduction ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 2099 2103 DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201402183
    297. 297
      Moussa, S. O.; Panchakarla, L. S.; Ho, M. Q.; El-Shall, M. S. Graphene-Supported, Iron-Based Nanoparticles for Catalytic Production of Liquid Hydrocarbons from Synthesis Gas: The Role of the Graphene Support in Comparison with Carbon Nanotubes ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 535 545 DOI: 10.1021/cs4010198
    298. 298
      Xu, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, H.; Zhao, Z.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Qiao, Y.; Gogotsi, Y. Self-Sensing, Ultra light, and Conductive 3D Graphene/Iron Oxide Aerogel Elastomer Deformable in a Magnetic Field ACS Nano 2015, 9, 3969 3977 DOI: 10.1021/nn507426u
    299. 299
      Chen, Y.; Wang, Y. L.; Zhang, H. B.; Li, X. F.; Gui, C. X.; Yu, Z. Z. Enhanced Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Efficiency of Polystyrene/Graphene Composites with Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Carbon 2015, 82, 67 76 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.031
    300. 300
      Yao, K.; Gong, J.; Tian, N. N.; Lin, Y. C.; Wen, X.; Jiang, Z. W.; Na, H.; Tang, T. Flammability Properties and Electromagnetic Interference Shielding of PVC/Graphene Composites Containing Fe3O4 nanoparticles RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 31910 31919 DOI: 10.1039/C5RA01046B
    301. 301
      Singh, A. P.; Mishra, M.; Hashim, D. P.; Narayanan, T. N.; Hahm, M. G.; Kumar, P.; Dwfuedi, J.; Kedawat, G.; Gupta, A.; Singh, B. P. Probing the Engineered Sandwich Network of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube-Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites for High Performance Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Applications Carbon 2015, 85, 79 88 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.065
    302. 302
      Kumar, S.; Singh, A. K.; Dasmahapatra, A. K.; Mandal, T. K.; Bandyopadhyay, D. Graphene Based Multifunctional Superbots Carbon 2015, 89, 31 40 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.012
    303. 303
      Jiang, Z.; Li, J.; Aslan, H.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Chen, M.; Huang, Y.; Froning, J. P.; Otyepka, M.; Zboril, R. A High Efficiency H2S Gas Sensor Material: Paper Like Fe2O3/graphene Nanosheets and Structural Alignment Dependency of Device Efficiency J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 6714 6717 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta15180h
    304. 304
      Wang, K.; Wan, S.; Liu, Q.; Yang, N.; Zhai, J. CdS Quantum Dot-Decorated Titania/Graphene Nanosheets Stacking Structures for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Solar Cells RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 23755 23761 DOI: 10.1039/c3ra43770a
    305. 305
      Bi, E.; Su, Y.; Chen, H.; Yang, X.; Yin, M.; Ye, F.; Li, Z.; Han, L. A Hybrid Catalyst Composed of Reduced Graphene Oxide/Cu2S Quantum Dots as a Transparent Counter Electrode for Dye Sensitized Solar Cells RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 9075 9078 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA14029J
    306. 306
      Fu, M.; Jiao, Q.; Zhao, Y. One-Step Vapor Diffusion Synthesis of Uniform CdS Quantum Dots/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites as Efficient Visible-Light Photocatalysts RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 23242 23250 DOI: 10.1039/c4ra02000f
    307. 307
      Mo, R.; Lei, Z.; Sun, K.; Rooney, D. Facile Synthesis of Anatase TiO2 Quantum- Dot/Graphene Nanosheet Composites with Enhanced Electrochemical Performance for Lithium-Ion Batteries Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2084 2088 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201304338
    308. 308
      Zeng, X.; Tu, W.; Li, J.; Bao, J.; Dai, Z. Photoelectrochemical Biosensor Using Enzyme-Catalyzed in Situ Propagation of CdS Quantum Dots on Graphene Oxide ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 16197 16203 DOI: 10.1021/am5043164
    309. 309
      Jiang, S.-D.; Tang, G.; Ma, Y.-F.; Hu, Y.; Song, L. Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene-ZnS Quantum Dots Composites with Highly Efficient Visible Light Photodegradation Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 151, 34 42 DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.11.019
    310. 310
      Xia, H.; Hong, C.; Li, B.; Zhao, B.; Lin, Z.; Zheng, M.; Savilov, S. V.; Aldoshin, S. M. Facile Synthesis of Hematite Quantum-Dot/Functionalized Graphene-Sheet Composites as Advanced Anode Materials for Asymmetric Supercapacitors Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 627 635 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201403554
    311. 311
      Chao, D.; Zhu, C.; Xia, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Liang, P.; Lin, J.; Zhang, H.; Shen, Z. X. Graphene Quantum Dots Coated VO2 Arrays for Highly Durable Electrodes for Li and Na Ion Batteries Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 565 573 DOI: 10.1021/nl504038s
    312. 312
      Yeh, T. F.; Teng, C. Y.; Chen, S. J.; Teng, H. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots as Photocatalysts for Overall Water-Splitting under Visible Light Illumination Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3297 3303 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201305299
    313. 313
      Chao, D.; Zhu, C.; Xia, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Liang, P.; Lin, J.; Zhang, H.; Shen, Z. X. Graphene Quantum Dots Coated VO2 Arrays for Highly Durable Electrodes for Li and Na Ion Batteries Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 565 573 DOI: 10.1021/nl504038s
    314. 314
      He, P.; Sun, J.; Tian, S.; Yang, S.; Ding, S.; Ding, G.; Xie, X.; Jiang, M. Processable Aqueous Dispersions of Graphene Stabilized by Graphene Quantum Dots Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 218 226 DOI: 10.1021/cm503782p
    315. 315
      Lin, Y.; Chapman, R.; Stevens, M. M. Integrative Self-Assembly of Graphene Quantum Dots and Biopolymers into a Versatile Biosensing Toolkit Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 3183 3192 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201500624
    316. 316
      Zhang, Q.; Jie, J.; Diao, S.; Shao, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, L.; Deng, W.; Hu, W.; Xia, H.; Yuan, X. Solution-Processed Graphene Quantum Dot Deep-UV Photodetectors ACS Nano 2015, 9, 1561 1570 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b00437
    317. 317
      Song, S. H.; Jang, M. H.; Chung, J.; Jin, S. H.; Kim, B. H.; Hur, S. H.; Yoo, S. H.; Cho, Y. H.; Jeon, S. W. Highly Efficient Light-Emitting Diode of Graphene Quantum Dots Fabricated from Graphite Intercalation Compounds Adv. Opt. Mater. 2014, 2, 1016 1023 DOI: 10.1002/adom.201400184
    318. 318
      Kumar, P. N.; Mandal, S.; Deepa, M.; Srivastava, A. K.; Joshi, A. G. Functionalized Graphite Platelets and Lead Sulfide Quantum Dots Enhance Solar Conversion Capability of a Titanium Dioxide/Cadmium Sulfide Assembly J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 18924 18937 DOI: 10.1021/jp5052408
    319. 319
      Jung, M. H.; Chu, M. J. Comparative Experiments of Graphene Covalently and Physically Binding CdSe Quantum Dots to Enhance the Electron Transport in Flexible Photovoltaic Devices Nanoscale 2014, 6, 9241 9249 DOI: 10.1039/C4NR02254H
    320. 320
      Guo, S.; Bao, D.; Upadhyayula, S.; Wang, W.; Guvenc, A. B.; Kyle, J. R.; Hosseinibay, H.; Bozhilov, K. N.; Vullev, V. I.; Ozkan, C. S. Photoinduced Electron Transfer Between Pyridine Coated Cadmium Selenide Quantum Dots and Single Sheet Graphene Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 5199 5211 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201203652
    321. 321
      Hirose, T.; Kutsuma, Y.; Kurita, A.; Kaneko, T.; Tamai, N. Blinking Suppression of CdTe Quantum Dots on Epitaxial Graphene and the Analysis with Marcus Electron Transfer Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 083102 DOI: 10.1063/1.4893667
    322. 322
      Liu, J.; Kumar, P.; Hu, Y.; Cheng, G. J.; Irudayaraj, J. Enhanced Multiphoton Emission from CdTe/ZnS Quantum Dots Decorated on Single-Layer Graphene J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 6331 6336 DOI: 10.1021/jp5123147
    323. 323
      Qin, J.; Wang, X.; Cao, M.; Hu, C. Germanium Quantum Dots Embedded in N-Doping Graphene Matrix with Sponge-Like Architecture for Enhanced Performance in Lithium-Ion Batteries Chem. - Eur. J. 2014, 20, 9675 9682 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201402151
    324. 324
      Sun, X.; Zhou, C.; Xie, M.; Sun, H.; Hu, T.; Lu, F.; Scott, S. M.; George, S. M.; Lian, J. Synthesis of ZnO Quantum Dot/Graphene Nanocomposites by Atomic Layer Deposition with High Lithium Storage Capacity J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 7319 7326 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA00589A
    325. 325
      Zhou, X.; Shi, J.; Liu, Y.; Su, Q.; Zhang, J.; Du, G. Microwave Irradiation Synthesis of Co3O4 Quantum Dots/Graphene Composite as Anode Materials for Li-Ion Battery Electrochim. Acta 2014, 143, 175 179 DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.023
    326. 326
      Zhao, S.; Xie, D.; Yu, X.; Su, Q.; Zhang, J.; Du, G. Facile Synthesis of Fe3O4@C Quantum Dots/Graphene Nanocomposite with Enhanced Lithium-Storage Performance Mater. Lett. 2015, 142, 287 290 DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.12.051
    327. 327
      Wei, W.; Yang, S.; Zhou, H.; Lieberwirth, I.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K. 3D Graphene Foams Cross-linked with Pre-encapsulated Fe3O4 Nanospheres for Enhanced Lithium Storage Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2909 2914 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201300445
    328. 328
      Tayyebi, A.; Tavakoli, M. M.; Outokesh, M.; Shafiekhani, A.; Simchi, A. Supercritical Synthesis and Characterization of Graphene-PbS Quantum Dots Composite with Enhanced Photovoltaic Properties Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 7382 7392 DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b00008
    329. 329
      Gao, H.; Shangguan, W.; Hu, G.; Zhu, K. Preparation and Photocatalytic Performance of Transparent Titania Film from Monolayer Titania Quantum Dots Appl. Catal., B 2016, 180, 416 423 DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.06.049
    330. 330
      Cao, S.; Chen, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Yu, W.; Liang, B.; Tsang, Y. MnOx Quantum Dots Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide/TiO2 Nanohybrids for Enhanced Activity by a UV Pre-Catalytic Microwave Method Appl. Catal., B 2015, 176–177, 500 512 DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.041
    331. 331
      Kaur, P.; Shin, M. S.; Sharma, N.; Kaur, N.; Joshi, A.; Chae, S. R.; Park, J. S.; Kang, M. S.; Sekhon, S. S. Non-Covalent Functionalization of Graphene with Poly(diallyl dimethylammonium) Chloride: Effect of a Non-Ionic Surfactant Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 1541 1547 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.068
    332. 332
      Tiwari, J. N.; Tiwari, R. N.; Kim, K. S. Zero-Dimensional, One-Dimensional, Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Nanostructured Materials for Advanced Electrochemical Energy Devices Prog. Mater. Sci. 2012, 57, 724 803 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.08.003
    333. 333
      Tiwari, J. N.; Tiwari, R. N.; Singh, G.; Kim, K. S. Recent Progress in the Development of Anode and Cathode Catalysts for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells Nano Energy 2013, 2, 553 578 DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.06.009
    334. 334
      Tiwari, J. N.; Tiwari, R. N.; Chang, Y.-M.; Lin, K.-L. A Promising Approach to the Synthesis of 3D Nanoporous Graphitic Carbon as a Unique Electrocatalyst Support for Methanol Oxidation ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 460 466 DOI: 10.1002/cssc.200900223
    335. 335
      Tiwari, J. N.; Tiwari, R. N.; Singh, G.; Lin, K.-L. Direct Synthesis of Vertically Interconnected 3-D Graphitic Nanosheets on Hemispherical Carbon Particles by Microwave Plasma CVD Plasmonics 2011, 6, 67 73 DOI: 10.1007/s11468-010-9170-7
    336. 336
      Dubey, P.; Kumar, A.; Prakash, R. Non-Covalent Functionalization of Graphene Oxide by Polyindole and Subsequent Incorporation of Ag Nanoparticles for Electrochemical Applications Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 355, 262 267 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.079
    337. 337
      Campbell, P. G.; Merrill, M. D.; Wood, B. C.; Montalvo, E.; Worsley, M. A.; Baumann, T. F.; Biener, J. Battery/Supercapacitor Hybrid via Non-Covalent Functionalization of Graphene Macro-Assemblies J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 17764 17770 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA03605K
    338. 338
      Kong, D.; He, H.; Song, Q.; Wang, B.; Lv, W.; Yang, Q.-H.; Zhi, L. Rational Design of MoS2@Graphene Nanocables: Towards High Performance Electrode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 3320 3325 DOI: 10.1039/C4EE02211D
    339. 339
      Yang, S.; Cao, C.; Huang, P.; Peng, L.; Sun, Y.; Wei, F.; Song, W. Sandwich-Like Porous TiO2/Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8701 8705 DOI: 10.1039/C5TA01744K
    340. 340
      Ali, G.; Oh, S. H.; Kim, S. Y.; Kim, J. Y.; Cho, B. W.; Chung, K. Y. An Open-Framework Iron Fluoride and Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite as a High-Capacity Cathode Material for Na-Ion Batteries J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 10258 10266 DOI: 10.1039/C5TA00643K
    341. 341
      David, L.; Bhandavat, R.; Singh, G. MoS2/Graphene Composite Paper for Sodium-Ion Battery Electrodes ACS Nano 2014, 8, 1759 1770 DOI: 10.1021/nn406156b
    342. 342
      Hu, C.; Zheng, G.; Zhao, F.; Shao, H.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, N.; Jiang, L.; Qu, L. A Powerful Approach to Functional Graphene Hybrids for High Performance Energy-Related Applications Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 3699 3708 DOI: 10.1039/C4EE01876A
    343. 343
      Ren, X.; Hu, Z.; Hu, H.; Qiang, R.; Li, L.; Li, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, H. Noncovalently-Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets by Water-Soluble Methyl Green for Supercapacitor Application Mater. Res. Bull. 2015, 70, 215 221 DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.04.045
    344. 344
      Jung, S. M.; Mafra, D. L.; Lin, C.-T.; Jung, H. Y.; Kong, J. Controlled Porous Structures of Graphene Aerogels and Their Effect on Supercapacitor Performance Nanoscale 2015, 7, 4386 4393 DOI: 10.1039/C4NR07564A
    345. 345
      Jana, M.; Saha, S.; Khanra, P.; Samanta, P.; Koo, H.; Murmu, N. C.; Kuila, T. Non-Covalent Functionalization of Reduced Graphene Oxide Using Sulfanilic Acid Azocromotrop and Its Application as a Supercapacitor Electrode Material J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 7323 7331 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA07009G
    346. 346
      Hsu, W.-T.; Tsai, Z.-S.; Chen, L.-C.; Chen, G.-Y.; Lin, C.-C.; Chen, M.-H.; Song, J.-M.; Lin, C.-H. Passivation Ability of Graphene Oxide Demonstrated by Two-Different-Metal Solar Cells Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 696 DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-696
    347. 347
      Kim, K. S.; Zhao, Y.; Jang, H.; Lee, S. Y.; Kim, J. M.; Kim, K. S.; Ahn, J.-H.; Kim, P.; Choi, J.-Y.; Hong, B. H. Large-Scale Pattern Growth of Graphene Films for Stretchable Transparent Electrodes Nature 2009, 457, 706 710 DOI: 10.1038/nature07719
    348. 348
      Yin, Z.; Zhu, J.; He, Q.; Cao, X.; Tan, C.; Chen, H.; Yan, Q.; Zhang, H. Graphene-Based Materials for Solar Cell Applications Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 1300574 DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201300574
    349. 349
      Liu, J.; Xue, Y.; Dai, L. Sulfated Graphene Oxide as a Hole-Extraction Layer in High-Performance Polymer Solar Cells J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 1928 1933 DOI: 10.1021/jz300723h
    350. 350
      Shi, E.; Li, H.; Yang, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Li, P.; Shang, Y.; Wu, S.; Li, X.; Wei, J. Colloidal Antireflection Coating Improves Graphene-Silicon Solar Cells Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1776 1781
    351. 351
      Wang, J. T.-W.; Ball, J. M.; Barea, E. M.; Abate, A.; Alexander-Webber, J. A.; Huang, J.; Saliba, M.; Mora-Sero, I.; Bisquert, J.; Snaith, H. J. Low-Temperature Processed Electron Collection Layers of Graphene/TiO2 Nanocomposites in Thin Film Perovskite Solar Cells Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 724 730 DOI: 10.1021/nl403997a
    352. 352
      Kim, H.; Mattevi, C.; Kim, H. J.; Mittal, A.; Mkhoyan, K. A.; Riman, R. E.; Chhowalla, M. Optoelectronic Properties of Graphene Thin Films Deposited by a Langmuir-Blodgett Assembly Nanoscale 2013, 5, 12365 12374 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr02907g
    353. 353
      Supur, M.; Ohkubo, K.; Fukuzumi, S. Photoinduced Charge Separation in Ordered Self-Assemblies of Perylenediimide-Graphene Oxide Hybrid Layers Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 13359 13361 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC05694A
    354. 354
      Dehsari, H. S.; Shalamzari, E. K.; Gavgani, J. N.; Taromi, F. A.; Ghanbary, S. Efficient Preparation of Ultralarge Graphene Oxide Using a PEDOT:PSS/GO Composite Layer as Hole Transport Layer in Polymer-Based Optoelectronic Devices RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 55067 55076 DOI: 10.1039/C4RA09474C
    355. 355
      Kymakis, E.; Savva, K.; Stylianakis, M. M.; Fotakis, C.; Stratakis, E. Flexible Organic Photovoltaic Cells with In Situ Nonthermal Photoreduction of Spin-Coated Graphene Oxide Electrodes Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 2742 2749 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201202713
    356. 356
      Oregan, B.; Gratzel, M. A Low-Cost, High-Efficiency Solar Cell Based on Dye-Sensitized Colloidal TiO2 Films Nature 1991, 353, 737 740 DOI: 10.1038/353737a0
    357. 357
      Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L.; Kloo, L.; Pettersson, H. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6595 6663 DOI: 10.1021/cr900356p
    358. 358
      Cheng, G.; Akhtar, M. S.; Yang, O. B.; Stadler, F. J. Novel Preparation of Anatase TiO2@Reduced Graphene Oxide Hybrids for High-Performance Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 6635 6642 DOI: 10.1021/am4013374
    359. 359
      Bi, E.; Chen, H.; Yang, X.; Peng, W.; Graetzel, M.; Han, L. A Quasi Core-Shell Nitrogen-Doped Graphene/Cobalt Sulfide Conductive Catalyst for Highly Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2637 2641 DOI: 10.1039/C4EE01339E
    360. 360
      Yang, W. S.; Noh, J. H.; Jeon, N. J.; Kim, Y. C.; Ryu, S.; Seo, J.; Seok, S. I. High-Performance Photovoltaic Perovskite Layers Fabricated through Intramolecular Exchange Science 2015, 348, 1234 1237 DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa9272
    361. 361
      Jeon, N. J.; Noh, J. H.; Yang, W. S.; Kim, Y. C.; Ryu, S.; Seo, J.; Seok, S. I. Compositional Engineering of Perovskite Materials for High-Performance Solar Cells Nature 2015, 517, 476 480 DOI: 10.1038/nature14133
    362. 362
      Kong, D.; Wang, H.; Cha, J. J.; Pasta, M.; Koski, K. J.; Yao, J.; Cui, Y. Synthesis of MoS2 and MoSe2 Films with Vertically Aligned Layers Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1341 1347 DOI: 10.1021/nl400258t
    363. 363
      Wang, H.; Kong, D.; Johanes, P.; Cha, J. J.; Zheng, G.; Yan, K.; Liu, N.; Cui, Y. MoSe2 and WSe2 Nanofilms with Vertically Aligned Molecular Layers on Curved and Rough Surfaces Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3426 3433 DOI: 10.1021/nl401944f
    364. 364
      Chen, W. F.; Wang, C. H.; Sasaki, K.; Marinkovic, N.; Xu, W.; Muckerman, J. T.; Zhu, Y.; Adzic, R. R. Highly Active and Durable Nanostructured Molybdenum Carbide Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Production Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 943 951 DOI: 10.1039/c2ee23891h
    365. 365
      Vrubel, H.; Hu, X. Molybdenum Boride and Carbide Catalyze Hydrogen Evolution in both Acidic and Basic Solutions Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 12703 12706 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201207111
    366. 366
      Karunadasa, H. I.; Montalvo, E.; Sun, Y.; Majda, M.; Long, J. R.; Chang, C. J. A Molecular MoS2 Edge Site Mimic for Catalytic Hydrogen Generation Science 2012, 335, 698 702 DOI: 10.1126/science.1215868
    367. 367
      Chen, W.-F.; Sasaki, K.; Ma, C.; Frenkel, A. I.; Marinkovic, N.; Muckerman, J. T.; Zhu, Y.; Adzic, R. R. Hydrogen-Evolution Catalysts Based on Non-Noble Metal Nickel-Molybdenum Nitride Nanosheets Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6131 6135 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201200699
    368. 368
      Cao, B.; Veith, G. M.; Neuefeind, J. C.; Adzic, R. R.; Khalifah, P. G. Mixed Close-Packed Cobalt Molybdenum Nitrides as Non-noble Metal Electrocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 19186 19192 DOI: 10.1021/ja4081056
    369. 369
      Chen, W.-F.; Iyer, S.; Iyer, S.; Sasaki, K.; Wang, C.-H.; Zhu, Y.; Muckerman, J. T.; Fujita, E. Biomass-Derived Electrocatalytic Composites for Hydrogen Evolution Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1818 1826 DOI: 10.1039/c3ee40596f
    370. 370
      Xie, X.; Lin, L.; Liu, R.-Y.; Jiang, Y.-F.; Zhu, Q.; Xu, A.-W. The Synergistic Effect of Metallic Molybdenum Dioxide Nanoparticle Decorated Graphene as an Active Electrocatalyst for an Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Reaction J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8055 8061 DOI: 10.1039/C5TA00622H
    371. 371
      Chang, Y.-H.; Lin, C.-T.; Chen, T.-Y.; Hsu, C.-L.; Lee, Y.-H.; Zhang, W.; Wei, K.-H.; Li, L.-J. Highly Efficient Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Production by MoSx Grown on Graphene-Protected 3D Ni Foams Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 756 760 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201202920
    372. 372
      Levy, R. B.; Boudart, M. Platinum-Like Behavior of Tungsten Carbide in Surface Catalysis Science 1973, 181, 547 549 DOI: 10.1126/science.181.4099.547
    373. 373
      Pan, L. F.; Li, Y. H.; Yang, S.; Liu, P. F.; Yu, M. Q.; Yang, H. G. Molybdenum Carbide Stabilized on Graphene with High Electrocatalytic Activity for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 13135 13137 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC05698A
    374. 374
      Zhang, X.; Meng, F.; Mao, S.; Ding, Q.; Shearer, M. J.; Faber, M. S.; Chen, J.; Hamers, R. J.; Jin, S. Amorphous MoSxCly Electrocatalyst Supported by Vertical Graphene for Efficient Electrochemical and Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Generation Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 862 868 DOI: 10.1039/C4EE03240C
    375. 375
      Zhou, W.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, Y.; Lu, J.; Zhou, K.; Yang, L.; Tang, Z.; Li, L.; Chen, S. N-Doped Carbon-Wrapped Cobalt Nanoparticles on N-Doped Graphene Nanosheets for High-Efficiency Hydrogen Production Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 2026 2032 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00331
    376. 376
      Chowdhury, I.; Duch, M. C.; Mansukhani, N. D.; Hersam, M. C.; Bouchard, D. Colloidal Properties and Stability of Graphene Oxide Nanomaterials in the Aquatic Environment Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 6288 6296 DOI: 10.1021/es400483k
    377. 377
      Achari, A.; Datta, K. K. R.; De, M.; Dravid, V. P.; Eswaramoorthy, M. Amphiphilic Aminoclay-RGO Hybrids: ASimple Strategy to Disperse a High Concentration of RGO in Water Nanoscale 2013, 5, 5316 5320 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr01108a
    378. 378
      McCoy, T. M.; Brown, P.; Eastoe, J.; Tabor, R. F. Noncovalent Magnetic Control and Reversible Recovery of Graphene Oxide Using Iron Oxide and Magnetic Surfactants ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 2124 2133 DOI: 10.1021/am508565d
    379. 379
      Le, N. H.; Seema, H.; Kemp, K. C.; Ahmed, N.; Tiwari, J. N.; Park, S.; Kim, K. S. Solution-Processable Conductive Micro-Hydrogels of Nanoparticle/Graphene Platelets Produced by Reversible Self-Assembly and Aqueous Exfoliation J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 12900 12908 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta12735d
    380. 380
      Zubir, N. A.; Yacou, C.; Motuzas, J.; Zhang, X.; da Costa, J. C. D. Structural and Functional Investigation of Graphene Oxide-Fe3O4 Nanocomposites for the Heterogeneous Fenton-Like Reaction Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4594 DOI: 10.1038/srep04594
    381. 381
      Liu, Y.; Jiang, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, X.; Liu, T.; Yan, X.; Ding, J.; Cai, Q.; Zhang, J. Halloysite Nanotubes@Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite for Removal of Dyes from Water and as Supercapacitors J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 4264 4269 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta14594h
    382. 382
      Dong, Z.; Wang, D.; Liu, X.; Pei, X.; Chen, L.; Jin, J. Bio-Inspired Surface-Functionalization of Graphene Oxide for the Adsorption of Organic Dyes and Heavy Metal Ions with a Superhigh Capacity J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 5034 5040 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta14751g
    383. 383
      Mondal, T.; Bhowmick, A. K.; Krishnamoorti, R. Synthesis and Characterization of Bi-Functionalized Graphene and Expanded Graphite Using n-butyl Lithium and Their Use for Efficient Water Soluble Dye Adsorption J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 8144 8153 DOI: 10.1039/c3ta11212h
    384. 384
      Liang, R.; Shen, L.; Jing, F.; Qin, N.; Wu, L. Preparation of MIL-53(Fe)-Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites by a Simple Self-Assembly Strategy for Increasing Interfacial Contact: Efficient Visible-Light Photocatalysts ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 9507 9515 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b00682
    385. 385
      Qi, X.; Tan, C.; Wei, J.; Zhang, H. Synthesis of Graphene-Conjugated Polymer Nanocomposites for Electronic Device Applications Nanoscale 2013, 5, 1440 1451 DOI: 10.1039/c2nr33145d
    386. 386
      Lu, H.; Yao, Y.; Huang, W. M.; Hui, D. Noncovalently Functionalized Carbon Fiber by Grafted Self-Assembled Graphene Oxide and the Synergistic Effect on Polymeric Shape Memory Nanocomposites Composites, Part B 2014, 67, 290 295 DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.022
    387. 387
      Lu, H.; Liang, F.; Gou, J.; Leng, J.; Du, S. Synergistic Effect of Ag Nanoparticle-Decorated Graphene Oxide and Carbon Fiber on Electrical Actuation of Polymeric Shape Memory Nanocomposites Smart Mater. Struct. 2014, 23, 085034 DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/23/8/085034
    388. 388
      Love, J. C.; Estroff, L. A.; Kriebel, J. K.; Nuzzo, R. G.; Whitesides, G. M. Self-Assembled Monolayers of Thiolates on Metals as a Form of Nanotechnology Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1103 1169 DOI: 10.1021/cr0300789
    389. 389
      Schedin, F.; Geim, A. K.; Morozov, S. V.; Hill, E. W.; Blake, P.; Katsnelson, M. I.; Novoselov, K. S. Detection of Individual Gas Molecules Adsorbed on Graphene Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 652 655 DOI: 10.1038/nmat1967
    390. 390
      Wang, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Yoon, Y.; Weber, P. K.; Wang, H.; Guo, J.; Dai, H. N-Doping of Graphene Through Electrothermal Reactions with Ammonia Science 2009, 324, 768 771 DOI: 10.1126/science.1170335
    391. 391
      Joo, P.; Kim, B. J.; Jeon, E. K.; Cho, J. H.; Kim, B.-S. Optical Switching of the Dirac Point in Graphene Multilayer Field-Effect Transistors Functionalized with Spiropyran Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 10978 10980 DOI: 10.1039/c2cc35933b
    392. 392
      Li, B.; Klekachev, A. V.; Cantoro, M.; Huyghebaert, C.; Stesmans, A.; Asselberghs, I.; De Gendt, S.; De Feyter, S. Toward Tunable Doping in Graphene FETs by Molecular Self-Assembled Monolayers Nanoscale 2013, 5, 9640 9644 DOI: 10.1039/c3nr01255g
    393. 393
      Long, B.; Manning, M.; Burke, M.; Szafranek, B. N.; Visimberga, G.; Thompson, D.; Greer, J. C.; Povey, I. M.; MacHale, J.; Lejosne, G. Non-Covalent Functionalization of Graphene Using Self-Assembly of Alkane-Amines Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 717 725 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201101956
    394. 394
      Wang, H.; Bi, S.-G.; Ye, Y.-S.; Xue, Y.; Xie, X.-L.; Mai, Y.-W. An Effective Non-Covalent Grafting Approach to Functionalize Individually Dispersed Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets with High Grafting Density, Solubility and Electrical Conductivity Nanoscale 2015, 7, 3548 3557 DOI: 10.1039/C4NR06710J
    395. 395
      Kozhemyakina, N. V.; Englert, J. M.; Yang, G.; Spiecker, E.; Schmidt, C. D.; Hauke, F.; Hirsch, A. Non-Covalent Chemistry of Graphene: Electronic Communication with Dendronized Perylene Bisimides Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 5483 5487 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201003206
    396. 396
      Parvez, K.; Li, R.; Puniredd, S. R.; Hernandez, Y.; Hinkel, F.; Wang, S.; Feng, X.; Muellen, K. Electrochemically Exfoliated Graphene as Solution-Processable, Highly Conductive Electrodes for Organic Electronics ACS Nano 2013, 7, 3598 3606 DOI: 10.1021/nn400576v
    397. 397
      Woszczyna, M.; Winter, A.; Grothe, M.; Willunat, A.; Wundrack, S.; Stosch, R.; Weimann, T.; Ahlers, F.; Turchanin, A. All-Carbon Vertical van der Waals Heterostructures: Non-destructive Functionalization of Graphene for Electronic Applications Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4831 4837 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201400948
    398. 398
      Nottbohm, C. T.; Turchanin, A.; Beyer, A.; Stosch, R.; Goelzhaeuser, A. Mechanically Stacked 1-nm-Thick Carbon Nanosheets: Ultrathin Layered Materials with Tunable Optical, Chemical, and Electrical Properties Small 2011, 7, 874 883 DOI: 10.1002/smll.201001993
    399. 399
      Wang, Z. X.; Eigler, S.; Ishii, Y.; Hu, Y. C.; Papp, C.; Lytken, O.; Steinruck, H. P.; Halik, M. A Facile Approach to Synthesize an Oxo-Functionalized Graphene/Polymer Composite for Low-Voltage Operating Memory Devices J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 8595 8604 DOI: 10.1039/C5TC01861G
    400. 400
      Roth, A.; Ragoussi, M.-E.; Wibmer, L.; Katsukis, G.; de la Torre, G.; Torres, T.; Guldi, D. M. Electron-Accepting Phthalocyanine Pyrene Conjugates: Towards Liquid Phase Exfoliation of Graphite and Photoactive Nanohybrid Formation with Graphene Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 3432 3438 DOI: 10.1039/C4SC00709C
    401. 401
      Wang, Z.; Hu, G.; Liu, J.; Liu, W.; Zhang, H.; Wang, B. Coordinated Assembly of a New 3D Mesoporous Fe3O4@Cu2O-Graphene Oxide Framework as a Highly Efficient and Reusable Catalyst for the Synthesis of Quinoxalines Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 5069 5072 DOI: 10.1039/C5CC00250H
    402. 402
      Ren, R.; Li, S.; Li, J.; Ma, J.; Liu, H.; Ma, J. Enhanced Catalytic Activity of Au Nanoparticles Self-Assembled on Thiophenol Functionalized Graphene Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 2149 2156 DOI: 10.1039/C4CY01620C
    403. 403
      Pathak, P.; Gupta, S.; Grosulak, K.; Imahori, H.; Subramanian, V. Nature-Inspired Tree-Like TiO2 Architecture: A 3D Platform for the Assembly of CdS and Reduced Graphene Oxide for Photoelectrochemical Processes J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 7543 7553 DOI: 10.1021/jp512160h
    404. 404
      Padhi, D. K.; Parida, K.; Singh, S. K. Facile Fabrication Of RGO/N-GZ Mixed Oxide Nanocomposite For Efficient Hydrogen Production Under Visible Light J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 6634 6646 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00311
    405. 405
      Ullah, K.; Ye, S.; Lei, Z.; Cho, K.-Y.; Oh, W.-C. Synergistic Effect of PtSe2 and Graphene Sheets Supported by TiO2 as Cocatalysts Synthesized via Microwave Techniques for Improved Photocatalytic Activity Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 184 198 DOI: 10.1039/C4CY00886C
    406. 406
      Jiang, D.; Du, X.; Liu, Q.; Hao, N.; Qian, J.; Dai, L.; Mao, H.; Wang, K. Anchoring AgBr Nanoparticles on Nitrogen-Doped Graphene for Enhancement of Electrochemiluminescence and Radical Stability Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 4451 4454 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC09926E
    407. 407
      Joseph, K. L. V.; Lim, J.; Anthonysamy, A.; Kim, H.-I.; Choi, W.; Kim, J. K. Squaraine-Sensitized Composite of a Reduced Graphene Oxide/TiO2Photocatalyst: pi-pi Stacking as a New Method of Dye Anchoring J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 232 239 DOI: 10.1039/C4TA04313H
    408. 408
      Ma, H.; Tian, J.; Cui, L.; Liu, Y.; Bai, S.; Chen, H.; Shan, Z. Porous Activated Graphene Nanoplatelets Incorporated in TiO2 Photoanodes for High-Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8890 8895 DOI: 10.1039/C5TA00527B
    409. 409
      Xu, L.; Huang, W.-Q.; Wang, L.-L.; Tian, Z.-A.; Hu, W.; Ma, Y.; Wang, X.; Pan, A.; Huang, G.-F. Insights into Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution of g-C3N4 and Highly Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite: The Role of Oxygen Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 1612 1621 DOI: 10.1021/cm504265w
    410. 410
      Meng, F.; Cushing, S. K.; Li, J.; Hao, S.; Wu, N. Enhancement of Solar Hydrogen Generation by Synergistic Interaction of La2Ti2O7 Photocatalyst with Plasmonic Gold Nanoparticles and Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanosheets ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1949 1955 DOI: 10.1021/cs5016194
    411. 411
      Feifel, S. C.; Stieger, K. R.; Lokstein, H.; Lux, H.; Lisdat, F. High Photocurrent Generation by Photosystem I on Artificial Interfaces Composed of pi-System-Modified Graphene J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 12188 12196 DOI: 10.1039/C5TA00656B
    412. 412
      Moon, G.-H.; Kim, W.; Bokare, A. D.; Sung, N.-E.; Choi, W. Solar Production of H2O2 on Reduced Graphene Oxide-TiO2 Hybrid Photocatalysts Consisting of Earth-Abundant Elements Only Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 4023 4028 DOI: 10.1039/C4EE02757D
    413. 413
      Lee, D. H.; Song, D.; Kang, Y. S.; Park, W. I. Three-Dimensional Monolayer Graphene and TiO2 Hybrid Architectures for High-Efficiency Electrochemical Photovoltaic Cells J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 6880 6885 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00178
    414. 414
      Shah, S.; Yin, P. T.; Uehara, T. M.; Chueng, S. D.; Yang, L.; Lee, K. B. Guiding Stem Cell Differentiation into Oligodendrocytes Using Graphene-Nanofiber Hybrid Scaffolds Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3673 3680 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201400523
    415. 415
      Kim, T. H.; Shah, S.; Yang, L.; Yin, P. T.; Hossain, M. K.; Conley, B.; Choi, J. W.; Lee, K. B. Controlling Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Using Combinatorial Graphene Hybrid-Pattern Arrays ACS Nano 2015, 9, 3780 3790 DOI: 10.1021/nn5066028
    416. 416
      Park, J.; Kim, B.; Han, J.; Oh, J.; Park, S.; Ryu, S.; Jung, S.; Shin, J.; Lee, B. S.; Hong, B. H. Graphene Oxide Flakes as a Cellular Adhesive: Prevention of Reactive Oxygen Species Mediated Death of Implanted Cells for Cardiac Repair ACS Nano 2015, 9, 4987 4999 DOI: 10.1021/nn507149w
    417. 417
      Kang, S.; Park, J. B.; Lee, T. J.; Ryu, S.; Bhang, S. H.; La, W. G.; Noh, M. K.; Hong, B. H.; Kim, B. S. Covalent Conjugation of Mechanically Stiff Graphene Oxide Flakes to Three-Dimensional Collagen Scaffolds for Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Carbon 2015, 83, 162 172 DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.11.029
    418. 418
      Tiwari, J. N.; Vij, V.; Kemp, K. C.; Kim, K. S. Engineered Carbon-Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Sensors for Biomolecules ACS Nano 2016, 10, 46 80 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b05690
    419. 419
      Gu, W.; Deng, X.; Gu, X.; Jia, X.; Lou, B.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Wang, E. Stabilized, Superparamagnetic Functionalized Graphene/Fe3O4@Au Nanocomposites for a Magnetically-Controlled Solid-State Electrochemiluminescence Biosensing Application Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 1876 1881 DOI: 10.1021/ac503966u
    420. 420
      Bagheri, H.; Arab, S. M.; Khoshsafar, H.; Afkhami, A. A Novel Sensor for Sensitive Determination of Atropine Based on a Co3O4-Reduced Graphene Oxide Modified Carbon Paste Electrode New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 3875 3881 DOI: 10.1039/C5NJ00133A
    421. 421
      Yoon, H. J.; Kim, T. H.; Zhang, Z.; Azizi, E.; Pham, T. M.; Paoletti, C.; Lin, J.; Ramnath, N.; Wicha, M. S.; Hayes, D. F. Sensitive Capture of Circulating Tumour Cells by Functionalized Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 735 741 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.194
    422. 422
      Lerner, M. B.; Matsunaga, F.; Han, G. H.; Hong, S. J.; Xi, J.; Crook, A.; Perez-Aguilar, J. M.; Park, Y. W.; Saven, J. G.; Liu, R. Scalable Production of Highly Sensitive Nanosensors Based on Graphene Functionalized with a Designed G Protein-Coupled Receptor Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2709 2714 DOI: 10.1021/nl5006349
    423. 423
      Singh, M.; Holzinger, M.; Tabrizian, M.; Winters, S.; Berner, N. C.; Cosnier, S.; Duesberg, G. S. Noncovalently Functionalized Monolayer Graphene for Sensitivity Enhancement of Surface Plasmon Resonance Immunosensors J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 2800 2803 DOI: 10.1021/ja511512m
    424. 424
      Hu, W.; He, G.; Zhang, H.; Wu, X.; Li, J.; Zhao, Z.; Qiao, Y.; Lu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, C. M. Polydopamine-Functionalization of Graphene Oxide to Enable Dual Signal Amplification for Sensitive Surface Plasmon Resonance Imaging Detection of Biomarker Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 4488 4493 DOI: 10.1021/ac5003905
    425. 425
      Yi, M.; Yang, S.; Peng, Z.; Liu, C.; Li, J.; Zhong, W.; Yang, R.; Tan, W. Two-Photon Graphene Oxide/Aptamer Nanosensing Conjugate for In Vitro or In Vivo Molecular Probing Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 3548 3554 DOI: 10.1021/ac5000015
    426. 426
      Castrignano, S.; Gilardi, G.; Sadeghi, S. J. Human Flavin-Containing Monooxygenase 3 on Graphene Oxide for Drug Metabolism Screening Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 2974 2980 DOI: 10.1021/ac504535y
    427. 427
      Xu, S.; Man, B.; Jiang, S.; Wang, J.; Wei, J.; Xu, S.; Liu, H.; Gao, S.; Liu, H.; Li, Z. Graphene/Cu Nanoparticle Hybrids Fabricated by Chemical Vapor Deposition As Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Substrate for Label-Free Detection of Adenosine ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 10977 10987 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b02303
    428. 428
      Datta, K. K. R.; Kozak, O.; Ranc, V.; Havrdova, M.; Bourlinos, A. B.; Safarova, K.; Hola, K.; Tomankova, K.; Zoppellaro, G.; Otyepka, M. Quaternized Carbon Dot-Modified Graphene Oxide for Selective Cell Labelling – Controlled Nucleus and Cytoplasm Imaging Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 10782 10785 DOI: 10.1039/C4CC02637C
    429. 429
      Yin, P. T.; Shah, S.; Chhowalla, M.; Lee, K.-B. Design, Synthesis, and Characterization of Graphene-Nanoparticle Hybrid Materials for Bioapplications Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 2483 2531 DOI: 10.1021/cr500537t
    430. 430
      Dikin, D. A.; Stankovich, S.; Zimney, E. J.; Piner, R. D.; Dommett, G. H. B.; Evmenenko, G.; Nguyen, S. T.; Ruoff, R. S. Preparation and Characterization of Graphene Oxide Paper Nature 2007, 448, 457 460 DOI: 10.1038/nature06016
    431. 431
      Markovic, Z. M.; Harhaji-Trajkovic, L. M.; Todorovic-Markovic, B. M.; Kepic, D. P.; Arsikin, K. M.; Jovanovic, S. P.; Pantovic, A. C.; Dramicanin, M. D.; Trajkovic, V. S. In Vitro Comparison of the Photothermal Anticancer Activity of Graphene Nanoparticles and Carbon Nanotubes Biomaterials 2011, 32, 1121 1129 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.030
    432. 432
      Bitounis, D.; Ali-Boucetta, H.; Hong, B. H.; Min, D.-H.; Kostarelos, K. Prospects and Challenges of Graphene in Biomedical Applications Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2258 2268 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201203700
    433. 433
      Feng, L.; Wu, L.; Qu, X. New Horizons for Diagnostics and Therapeutic Applications of Graphene and Graphene Oxide Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 168 186 DOI: 10.1002/adma.201203229
    434. 434
      Robinson, J. T.; Tabakman, S. M.; Liang, Y.; Wang, H.; Casalongue, H. S.; Daniel, V.; Dai, H. Ultrasmall Reduced Graphene Oxide with High Near-Infrared Absorbance for Photothermal Therapy J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6825 6831 DOI: 10.1021/ja2010175
    435. 435
      Jung, H. S.; Kong, W. H.; Sung, D. K.; Lee, M.-Y.; Beack, S. E.; Keum, D. H.; Kim, K. S.; Yun, S. H.; Hahn, S. K. Nanographene Oxide-Hyaluronic Acid Conjugate for Photothermal Ablation Therapy of Skin Cancer ACS Nano 2014, 8, 260 268 DOI: 10.1021/nn405383a
    436. 436
      Liu, J.; Jiang, X.; Xu, L.; Wang, X.; Hennink, W. E.; Zhuo, R. Novel Reduction-Responsive Cross-Linked Polyethylenimine Derivatives by Click Chemistry for Nonviral Gene Delivery Bioconjugate Chem. 2010, 21, 1827 1835 DOI: 10.1021/bc100191r
    437. 437
      Ma, N.; Li, Y.; Xu, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X. Dual Redox Responsive Assemblies Formed from Diselenide Block Copolymers J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 442 443 DOI: 10.1021/ja908124g
    438. 438
      Yang, X.; Zhao, N.; Xu, F.-J. Biocleavable Graphene Oxide Based-Nanohybrids Synthesized via ATRP for Gene/Drug Delivery Nanoscale 2014, 6, 6141 6150 DOI: 10.1039/c4nr00907j
    439. 439
      Sherlock, S. P.; Tabakman, S. M.; Xie, L.; Dai, H. Photothermally Enhanced Drug Delivery by Ultrasmall Multifunctional FeCo/Graphitic Shell Nanocrystals ACS Nano 2011, 5, 1505 1512 DOI: 10.1021/nn103415x
    440. 440
      Dembereldorj, U.; Kim, M.; Kim, S.; Ganbold, E.-O.; Lee, S. Y.; Joe, S.-W. A Spatiotemporal Anticancer Drug Release Platform of PEGylated Graphene Oxide Triggered by Glutathione InVitro and In Vivo J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 23845 23851 DOI: 10.1039/c2jm34853e
    441. 441
      Kiyomiya, K.; Matsuo, S.; Kurebe, M. Mechanism of Specific Nuclear Transport of Adriamycin: The Mode of Nuclear Translocation of Adriamycin-Proteasome Complex Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 2467 2471
    442. 442
      Ochs, M.; Carregal-Romero, S.; Rejman, J.; Braeckmans, K.; De Smedt, S. C.; Parak, W. J. Light-Addressable Capsules as Caged Compound Matrix for Controlled Triggering of Cytosolic Reactions Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 695 699 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201206696
    443. 443
      Kim, H.; Lee, D.; Kim, J.; Kim, T.-I.; Kim, W. J. Photothermally Triggered Cytosolic Drug Delivery via Endosome Disruption Using a Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide ACS Nano 2013, 7, 6735 6746 DOI: 10.1021/nn403096s
    444. 444
      Yan, L.; Chang, Y.-N.; Yin, W.; Tian, G.; Zhou, G. L.; Liu, X.; Xing, G.; Zhao, L.; Gu, Z.; Zhao, Y. On-Demand Generation of Singlet Oxygen from a Smart Graphene Complex for the Photodynamic Treatment of Cancer Cells Biomater. Sci. 2014, 2, 1412 1418 DOI: 10.1039/C4BM00143E
    445. 445
      Dong, H.; Dai, W.; Ju, H.; Lu, H.; Wang, S.; Xu, L.; Zhou, S.-F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X. Multifunctional Poly(L-lactide)-Polyethylene Glycol-Grafted Graphene Quantum Dots for Intracellular MicroRNA Imaging and Combined Specific-Gene-Targeting Agents Delivery for Improved Therapeutics ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 11015 11023 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b02803
    446. 446
      Bianco, A. Graphene: Safe or Toxic? The Two Faces of the Medal Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4986 4997 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201209099

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect