ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

The Essential Medicinal Chemistry of Curcumin

Miniperspective

View Author Information
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Institute for Therapeutics Discovery and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414, United States
Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
§ Center for Natural Product Technologies, Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
Institute for Tuberculosis Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
*Phone: 612-626-6864. E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 5, 1620–1637
Publication Date (Web):January 11, 2017
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00975

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND.

  • Open Access
  • Editors Choice

Article Views

154419

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (1 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Curcumin is a constituent (up to ∼5%) of the traditional medicine known as turmeric. Interest in the therapeutic use of turmeric and the relative ease of isolation of curcuminoids has led to their extensive investigation. Curcumin has recently been classified as both a PAINS (pan-assay interference compounds) and an IMPS (invalid metabolic panaceas) candidate. The likely false activity of curcumin in vitro and in vivo has resulted in >120 clinical trials of curcuminoids against several diseases. No double-blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial of curcumin has been successful. This manuscript reviews the essential medicinal chemistry of curcumin and provides evidence that curcumin is an unstable, reactive, nonbioavailable compound and, therefore, a highly improbable lead. On the basis of this in-depth evaluation, potential new directions for research on curcuminoids are discussed.

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Natural products (NPs) form the basis for many widely used drugs. This utility was recently recognized on a larger stage, as the discoverer of artemisinin shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2015 with the discoverers of the anthelmintic avermectin family of NPs. Artemisinin, a NP discovered from a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), Artemisia annua, was developed into an effective therapy for Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Some researchers viewed this award as a validation of the general utility of TCMs. (1, 2) In marked contradistinction to this claimed vindication of the role of certain ethnic and traditional medicines (TxMs) in medical practice are recent reports labeling curcumin, a constituent of the spice turmeric and part of the mixture of compounds referred to as curcuminoids, as both a PAINS (pan assay interference compounds) (3) and an IMPS (invalid metabolic panaceas) compound. (4) Additionally, many researchers have described the potential “dark side of curcumin”: (5-9) the drawbacks noted for curcumin include its poor pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties, low efficacy in several disease models, and toxic effects under certain testing conditions. (5) These cautionary reports appear to have been swept away in the torrent of papers, reviews, patents, and Web sites touting the use of curcumin (and its primary commercial source, turmeric) as an anticancer agent, (10, 11) a therapeutic for Alzheimer’s disease, (12) a treatment for hangovers, (13, 14) erectile dysfunction, (15, 16) baldness, (17, 18) hirsutism, (19) a fertility-boosting, (20) and contraceptive (21) extract, collectively establishing the properties expected of a panacea. (22, 23)
Scientific manuscripts are still published regularly that are based solely on the foundational premise of the reported activity and therapeutic utility of curcumin. In 2015, this plethora of data motivated the compilation of a Curcumin Resource Database (CRDB) that seeks to support the preclinical development of curcuminoids by putting over 1000 analogues and their alleged molecular target (24) at the fingertips of researchers via a Web interface. The CRDB coverage of over 9000 publications and 500 patents demonstrates the magnitude of both the scientific interest and vast amount of dormant information that is awaiting a more global, medicinal chemistry interpretation. It is the goal of this manuscript to primarily review curcumin (1; Figure 1) and related curcuminoids, which are the species extracted from turmeric, and largely what is sold or tested in clinical trials.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Structural comparison of curcumin and artemisinin. Curcumin has been the focus of heavy research for new drug development. Artemisinin is an FDA approved antimalarial.

A simple analogy will help us set the stage for this Miniperspective. Artemisinin (2; Figure 1) has been shown to function like an effective long-range and targeted missile that homes in on heme-loving parasites and destroys them in a spectacular burst of nonselective reactivity. (25) The peroxide-containing structure of artemisinin suggests that it would be unstable in a biological setting. However, its in vivo stability (T1/2 = 2.5 h; F = 30%) (26) provides evidence that it is sufficiently stable, from a pharmacokinetic perspective, to be an effective therapeutic. Curcumin, on the other hand, is more like a missile that has shown excellent promise in early testing (in vitro), even though this testing may have been bedeviled by design problems that led to several misfires. The structure of 1 suggests that it might be unstable in a biological setting, and in fact, it is: both its in vitro and in vivo stabilities are abysmal (T1/2 < 5 min; F < 1%) (27, 28) relative to commercial drugs.
To our knowledge, compound 1 has never been shown to be conclusively effective in a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial for any indication. (29) Curcumin is best typified, therefore, as a missile that continually blows up on the launch pad, never reaching the atmosphere or its intended target(s). These results have given curcumin the label of pharmacodynamically fierce (hits many targets) yet pharmacokinetically feeble (does not get to its targets). (9) While these failures would normally end further research on its use as a therapeutic, they apparently have not deterred researchers interested in its development. Accordingly, major resources have been expended on research enterprises that involve curcumin as a key study agent. From 1995 to the present, according to the NIH RePORTER database (query of the term “curcumin” in keywords, titles, and abstracts), (30) federal funds exceeding $150 million have been awarded for projects that are linked, directly or indirectly, to the biomedical exploration of curcumin. This result gives an approximate estimate of the order of magnitude of resources (not scientific significance) that are used directly or indirectly for experiments with curcumin and its analogues. Consequently, projects involving, for example, method development work where curcuminoids serve as model compounds are likely included in this estimation. However, this continued interest has resulted in the generation of manuscripts reporting biological studies of curcumin at a rate that far outpaces those published on artemisinin (Figure 2). This suggests that while artemisinin research has matured, curcumin research may have entered the steep section of the hyperbolic black hole of natural products (NPs) (4) where effort rapidly exceeds utility, a common occurrence for IMPS. Furthermore, most NPs that have been successfully developed as drugs were discovered in phenotypic assays showing activity at or near a therapeutically relevant level. This allowed for the rapid development of the parent natural product or relatively straightforward analogue development to achieve a desired therapeutic effect. (6) Such was the story for artemisinin, but careful analysis of the literature leads to a much different conclusion where curcumin is concerned.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Comparison of publication frequency for biological studies of curcumin and artemisinin. The numbers of manuscripts per year were retrieved from SciFinder by searching for the substances curcumin (CAS no. 458-37-7) or artemisinin (CAS no. 63968-64-9) and then filtering by “biological study” and “document type” = journal. (Data accessed May 3, 2016.)

In this Miniperspective, we hope to address these questions regarding curcumin: PAINS, IMPS, or promise? Solid gold or just pyrite? Valuable lead for therapeutic development or still a tough challenge for NP and medicinal chemists? These are important questions, and they cannot be fully addressed even in this platform, as there are greater than 15 000 manuscripts published related to the biological interactions of curcumin, with ∼50 more manuscripts published each week. However, it is our goal to offer guidance and orthogonal perspectives to scientists and reviewers who may not have the time or resources to trek through the forest of curcumin literature. This is especially pertinent as articles relating to curcumin bioactivity appear in such a broad range of journals as to limit the ability of one to evaluate them all, due to both time and subscription limitations. By outlining the essential medicinal chemistry of curcumin, we aspire to improve the significance of science performed in the area of turmeric (and general NP) research and ensure that ever-precious research resources are spent most effectively. First, we will present evidence that curcumin is most probably an invalid lead compound, as can be shown by a critical evaluation of its PAINS and IMPS characteristics. Second, we will critically evaluate the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of curcumin responsible for its behavior in vitro and in vivo and tie these properties to the reported activity of curcumin against a variety of biological targets. Third, we will offer a critical look at a sampling of curcumin/curcuminoids clinical trials to put its therapeutic utility in context. The final section will compile the key points from the three discussion areas and seeks to identify new aspects that could potentially guide future research on this important traditional medicine.

Overview: Allure of the “Golden Spice”

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Turmeric, the powdered rhizome of Curcuma longa, is extensively used as a spice in curries and mustards, is often responsible for their distinct color, and contributes much to their flavor due to the presence of its oleoresins and essential oil. Turmeric is a member of the ginger family (Zingiberaceae) and is prescribed abundantly for ailments in both traditional Chinese and Indian medicine. (31) For example, turmeric preparations are applied to fresh wounds and bruises and as counterirritants for insect bites. Turmeric paste is used to facilitate scabbing in chicken pox and small pox. It is used in urologic diseases, hepatobiliary diseases and as an anthelminthic. Turmeric has also been described as a cancer remedy in Indian natural medical literature.
Major phytoconstituents of turmeric are diarylheptanoids, which occur in a mixture termed curcuminoids that generally make up approximately 1–6% of turmeric by dry weight. (32) Most crude extracts prepared from turmeric, and even some refined “curcumin” materials, contain three major compounds (Figure 3): curcumin [1, (1E,6E)-1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-1,6-heptadiene-3,5-dione, typically 60–70% of a crude extract], demethoxycurcumin (3, 20–27%), and bisdemethoxycurcumin (4, 10–15%), along with numerous and less abundant secondary metabolites. (33)
Although the multicomponent nature of “curcumin” is well documented, that fact and/or the unambiguous assignment of specific structures in a particular preparation is not always clear. Herein, the term “curcumin” will be used interchangeably with “curcuminoids” unless a more explicit description (e.g., of a single chemical structure) is deemed necessary. On the basis of our literature review, many in vitro studies use pure, synthetic 1, while most in vivo studies and clinical trials use a curcuminoid mixture. The dynamic nature of solubilized 1 makes it challenging to consider it a single compound in vitro or in vivo. However, regardless of the source material used in most studies, the structure of 1 is usually cited, perhaps by default, as designated active constituent that should be pursued for therapeutic benefit and is the compound used as a proposed “lead” structure for medicinal chemistry investigations. This Miniperspective will not attempt to address the potential therapeutic effects of even more complex turmeric extracts or preparations thereof but instead focuses on the reported utility of the chemical structure of the major constituent of these extracts: curcumin.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Major phytoconstituents of extracts of Curcuma longa. Compounds 1, 3, and 4, often grouped together as “curcuminoids”, generally make up approximately 1–6% of turmeric by weight. (33) Of a curcuminoid extract, 1 makes up 60–70% by weight, while 3 (20–27%) and 4 (10–15%) are more minor components. The major constituent of a curcuminoid extract, 1, and the properties important for its consideration as a lead compound for therapeutic development are the focus of this review.

From a drug discovery standpoint, 1 appears to have several attractive qualities. There is a plethora of publications reporting a wide variety of biological activities for the compound(s), which is/are “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) by the FDA as a food additive at levels up to 20 mg per serving, (34) a designation that could conceivably help developers bypass some regulatory requirements for its approval as a therapeutic. This designation, along with the long historical and cultural use of turmeric as a medication, has contributed to its popularity as a dietary supplement marketed for many common ailments. Sales of curcumin supplements in the United States were reported to exceed $20 million in 2014, though a precise number is difficult to estimate. (35) In concert with this boom in nutraceutical applications of curcumin, DSHEA (Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act) legislation establishing the legalities of dietary supplements in the United States (1994) and advents in in vitro testing likely contributed significantly to a sharp upturn in the publication of manuscripts regarding the use of curcumin in biological studies in the late 1990s (Figure 2). Since that time, curcumin has been reported to have activity for the following indications: anti-inflammatory, anti-HIV, antibacterial, antifungal, nematocidal, antiparasitic, antimutagenic, antidiabetic, antifibrinogenic, radioprotective, wound healing, lipid lowering, antispasmodic, (36) antioxidant, (37) immunomodulating, anticarcinogenic, (38) and Alzheimer’s disease, (39) among others. In many scientific and medicinal circles, these reported effects of curcumin have marked it as a source of future breakthrough therapeutics for complex diseases that are thought to require potent but nonselective therapeutics. In this uncritical enthusiasm for curcumin’s potential utility, its “dark side” (5) is often disregarded. It is important, therefore, that any manuscript or research proposal that is based on the bioactivity (experimentally tested or computationally predicted) of curcumin or its analogues addresses additional characteristics of this natural product: its chemical instability, poor ADME properties, potential toxicological effects, and its lack of success to date in the clinic. These challenges will be addressed in further detail in subsequent sections.

Curcumin Is a PAINS, IMPS, and Poor Lead Compound

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Curcumin Is a PAINS

PAINS, or pan-assay interference compounds, are compounds that have been observed to show activity in multiple types of assays by interfering with the assay readout rather than through specific compound/target interactions. Many compound classes have been codified and identified as PAINS or potential PAINS. (40) Compound 1 exhibits all known PAINS-type behaviors: covalent labeling of proteins, (41-43) metal chelation, (44) redox reactivity, (45) aggregation, (46) membrane disruption, (47) fluorescence interference, (48) and structural decomposition. (45, 49) This suggests that any report of its activity in an assay that does not either exclude or account for these potential modes of assay interference should be treated with caution. This is a very important consideration for reviewers, for example, of U.S. federal proposals that rely on published data regarding the bioactivity of curcumin. The most recent guidelines for the review of U.S. NIH proposals require four new considerations to establish reproducibility: premise, design, variables, and authentication. Consequently, any proposal based on apparent curcumin bioactivity should ensure that the “scientific premise forming the basis of the proposed research” is sound (that is, published activity is not simply a result of assay interference) and that the “chemical resources” are “authenticated”; i.e., analytical and target engagement methods are employed to provide convincing evidence that curcumin is the causative agent of activity.

Curcumin Is an IMP

From a collective point of view, IMPS are invalid metabolic panaceas located inside the center of the black hole of natural products (4) that tend to exhaust research resources. As singular elements, IMPS are prototypes of improbable metabolic panaceas that exhibit feeble performance as drug leads. The reported bioactive properties of IMPS are highly complicated by several factors that may be in addition to PAINS characteristics but often are separate from them. (4) After evaluating bioactivity profiles of curcumin reported in the global literature, two broad observations raise red flags: (1) the high rate at which this compound, or mixture, is reported as being bioactive and especially (2) the relatively high ratio of positive activities seen in proportion to the total number of distinct bioactivities reported: just over 300 as assessed using the NAPRALERT database. (4) NAPRALERT (www.napralert.org) is a relational database on the chemistry, biological activity, and folkloric use of natural products housed since 1975 at the Program for Collaborative Research in the Pharmaceutical Sciences at the College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago. Founded by the late Professor Norman R. Farnsworth, NAPRALERT has since compiled data from more than 190 000 literature references, with records of over 200 000 distinct chemical compounds from more than 60 000 species of organisms. As a result, NAPRALERT covers hundreds of thousands of reports of biological activity tests (including in vitro, in vivo, and clinical results) for both natural product extracts (400 000+) and chemical isolates (300 000+).
Further IMPS considerations include the PAINS characteristics of 1, chiefly chemical aggregation, (46) the presence of a reactive Michael acceptor, (50) and fluorescence activity. This last attribute is particularly important as the main categories of reported activities in NAPRALERT (see also, Supporting Information Tables 1 and 2) emerge from cellular assays, which typically involve fluorescence and quenching for end point detection. A more detailed analysis of the distribution of positive activities reported in NAPRALERT shows that 28 distinct pharmacological activities, equivalent to less than 10% of all those captured, represent approximately 50% of the total reported activities for 1. In contrast, in cases of successful NP-based drug leads such as artemisinin, ivermectin, and paclitaxel, this ratio is only between 1% and 2%. This distinctive “broad bioactivity profile” associates 1 closely with the top 100 compounds with the most promiscuous bioactivity reported. Of these top 100, the ginsenosides Rb-1 and Rg-1, genistein, quercetin, apigenin, nordihydroguaiaretic acid, resveratrol, kaempferol, and fisetin are the only compounds with even more distinct reported activities than 1. While this means that these nine compounds have a wide range of positive results in bioassays, it does not automatically mean that their pharmacological effects cover such a wide range in practice. It is equally notable that, just like 1, none of these nine compounds, or any of their derivatives, have reached maturity as a drug lead to date.
One of the most plausible explanations regarding the observed polypharmacology of curcumin, besides its apparent PAINS/IMPS character, promiscuous bioassay profile, and chemical instability (vide infra), is the variable purity status and widespread lack of characterization of “curcumin” materials. This unknown mixture represents what is termed static residual complexity (static RC; see also https://go.uic.edu/residualcomplexity): (51, 52) the assumed bioactive material and any impurities are present and constant throughout the bioassay. The high variability of curcumin preparations and sources makes static RC an important factor of variability and can lead to unpredictable or potentially irreproducible results. In contrast, dynamic residual complexity (dynamic RC) (52) is related to metabolic instability, a property that applies particularly to 1. The typical time frame for the biological experiments reported in NAPRALERT allows for significant degradation of 1 (vide infra). The degradation products will very likely have distinctly different in vitro and/or in vivo biological activities from the parent compound. In addition, biogenic metabolites are often different from the degradation products present in buffers or laboratory storage conditions, and the extended incubation times of many cellular assays make it difficult to know which degradation products are present and at what concentrations. (52) For example, a recently identified degradation product of 1 is a spiroepoxide, which is highly sensitive to acids and reacts readily with thiols. (53) This report indirectly emphasizes the relevance of dynamic RC by hypothesizing that the polypharmacology of 1 may in part, or even largely, be due to the sum of its degradation products.
Both the static and dynamic RC issues, as well as promiscuous reactivity, make the study of 1 a true challenge for both biologists and chemists, even when performed in close collaboration. Complex chemical characterization procedures need to be established and undertaken before starting biological experiments to control the initial material and characterize the remaining components at the end of the experiment (allowing the assessment of any degradation of the studied material). From the pharmacologist’s or biologist’s point of view, controlling chemical aggregation, target specificity (especially when using proteins), and photochemical conditions (absorbance, fluorescence, quenching, etc.) is paramount for achieving interpretable assay readouts and meaningful biological outcomes.

Curcumin Is a Poor Lead Compound

Compound 1 is completely out of balance as a lead compound when its PK and PD properties are weighed. While there are exceptions and some discrepancies about what makes a “good” lead, a prototypical lead compound for therapeutic discovery and development generally has less than 1 μM potency at its desired target(s), evidence of selectivity and tractable mechanism(s) of action, good bioavailability, chemical stability, and ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicology) qualities that can be optimized in a reasonable number of synthetic cycles. (54) Compound 1 has none of these features. Moreover, attempts to improve its ADMET qualities (typically the most difficult properties of a compound to optimize) and increase its specificity via chemical optimization and various formulations have thus far been unsuccessful. Optimization of the PK/PD of 1 may be impossible given the multiple structural features presumably responsible for its “desirable” activity. For example, one property often marked for optimization is indiscriminate thiol reactivity (particularly with proteins), though this is most likely a chief explanation for much of its polypharmacology. Of course, covalent reactivity can be useful in the development of therapeutics. (55-62) However, this mode of action is either purposefully designed into the drug as part of the discovery process or installed after optimization of potency and ADMET properties. For example, α,β-unsaturated reactive groups are often purposefully introduced into optimized, stable compounds to increase their potency and selectivity. Optimization to improve the feeble PK of 1 will most likely lead to concomitant dulling of its PD ferocity.

Chemical (In)Stability (45, 49)

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The structure of 1 contains a β-diketone moiety that readily undergoes keto–enol tautomerization (Figure 4). NMR studies using a variety of solvents at pH 3–9 have confirmed that the enol tautomer (1b), rather than the diketone (1a), is the only form of the molecule present at any detectable level in solution. (63) This preference for 1b leads to a planar, intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded structure both in solution and in powder form. (64) The calculated log P of 1 has been reported between 2.3 and 3.2, and it is practically insoluble in water at room temperature and neutral pH. (9, 65) At alkaline pH, the phenols are transformed to the phenolates, enabling the dissolution of 1 in water. A range of pKa values, 8.5–10.4 for the first and 9.5–10.7 for the second, have been reported for the phenolic protons depending on the solvent and method of measurement. (48) However, at both neutral and alkaline pH, 1 degrades rapidly. Compound 1 is more structurally stable in an acidic environment, but the equilibrium shifts toward the neutral form (low/no solubility) of the molecule in parallel with decreasing pH. (27, 64) Therefore, studies in buffered solvents typically involve first dissolving 1 in a polar protic organic solvent, like methanol, then diluting it in an excess of the aqueous solution.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Tautomerization of compound 1. NMR studies show that compound 1 is not present in solution as the diketone (1a) but only as a mixture of the equally present (due to symmetry) enol structures (1b). (63)

The conjugated system of 1 absorbs in the visible range (408–500 nm), (48) and this property has been used to study its degradation in various buffers through spectroscopic and HPLC methods (see also Supporting Information Table 2). At neutral pH (7.5) and rt in aqueous buffer, the t1/2 for loss of 1 as the parent compound is approximately 20 min. (66) When the temperature is increased to 37 °C, the reported t1/2 at pH 7.2 is less than 10 min. (27) This report of rapid degradation upon heating led to a more thorough investigation of the degradation products of 1. It is known that 1 is photoreactive, as a 5% reduction in parent material is observed simply when preparing samples in clear versus amber glass. (27) Compound 1 degrades by two main pathways: solvolysis and oxidative degradation. The solvolysis (nucleophilic substitution or elimination by solvent molecules) of the heptadienedione chain in aqueous alkaline buffer results in 90% compound degradation within 30 min. The major identified products are vanillin (5), ferulic acid (6), and feruloylmethane (7, Figure 5A). While the relative abundance of these degradation products differs at different incubation pH or temperature, they are also observed upon incubation of 1 in cell culture medium (RPMI 1640, Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium) and human blood. (27) Recent spectroscopic analysis has revealed that solvolysis is only a minor pathway, and the major chemical degradation product is a bicyclopentadione (8) that is produced by autoxidation (Figure 5B). (66) The spontaneous, free-radical-driven incorporation of O2 leads to oxygenation and double cyclization of the heptadienedione chain connecting the two methoxyphenol rings. (67) Further study of the kinetics of radiolabeled compound decomposition has also identified several additional degradation products that likely appear on the pathway to compound 8 formation. (45) This oxidative reaction occurs without photochemical initiation and may account, in part, for the reported antioxidant properties observed for compound 1. These degradation pathways suggest that dynamic RC (vide supra) should be considered when interpreting the outcome of bioassays involving 1.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Major chemical degradation pathways of compound 1. (A) Solvolysis under alkaline pH in buffered aqueous solution rapidly leads to multiple fragmentation byproducts. (27) (B) Autoxidation in buffered medium creates a bicyclopentadione (8) that is the major degradation product in aqueous conditions. (66) (C) Photodegradation of 1 can occur when in crystalline form and dissolved in organic solvent. (68) (D) When dissolved in certain organic solvents (like isopropanol), photodegradation can include reaction with the solvent as a substrate. (69)

While oxidative degradation does not require photochemical initiation, photochemical degradation of 1 does occur in both the crystalline and solubilized forms. Crystalline 1 is degraded by exposure to sunlight to give primarily 5, 6, ferulic aldehyde (9), and vanillic acid (10, Figure 5C). (68) The same degradation pattern is observed for 1 in organic solvents when it is exposed to light. Several solvent-dependent products are also formed. In methanol, isopropanol, and chloroform, an internal cyclization product is formed. Isopropanol can also behave as a reactive substrate, leading to the formation of a guaiacol derivative (11, Figure 5D). (69) The mechanism of photochemical degradation is caused mostly by type I and type II reactions with molecular oxygen, which has been described in detail elsewhere. (9)
The chemical stability of 1 can be improved by encapsulation with lipids or nanoparticles. (70, 71) Other attempts at improving stability have included synthetic manipulations to remove or protect the oxidation sites (phenolic and enolic hydroxyls) (72) and derivatization of the β-diketone to reduce the activity of the enolate Michael acceptor. (73, 74) While analogues of 1 may be a more viable route to the development of a stable molecule for in vitro or in vivo evaluation, they will need to be evaluated as entirely new chemical entities and are largely outside the scope of this discussion.
The rapid degradation of 1 brings many additional requirements for its investigation in an in vitro or in vivo setting. Stability of 1 under the assay conditions should always be demonstrated. This analysis has not been reported in the vast majority of the publications reviewed here. Additionally, several publications have used computational methods to predict the activity of 1 or to explain the bioactivity observed experimentally. (75, 76) Because 1 is likely not present in situ, or at least its bioactivity is confounded by the presence of multiple reactive and/or bioactive degradation products, these models are less relevant to the targets of interest. Even when computational studies have accounted for the binding characteristics of the degradation products, other probable mechanisms of interference have not been considered. (77)
A primary requirement for most pharmaceuticals is stability under physiological conditions (a surrogate for in vivo conditions) and stability under storage conditions or in formulations. Physiological conditions here are considered an aqueous environment at pH 7.4 and 37 °C. Compound 1 has none of these characteristics and displays prominent chemical instability. Below, we highlight several other concerns regarding the physicochemical properties of 1 that could explain its promiscuous reactivity; these also need to be addressed when studying this molecule in vitro or in vivo.

Physicochemical Properties

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The chemical instability of 1 is most likely the key property responsible for confounding the results of in vitro and in vivo measurements of its bioactivity and for undermining computational predictions of its potential binding and activity in biological assays. Compound 1 also displays undesirable physicochemical properties relative to known drugs. In addition to being unstable, it forms chemical aggregates (colloids) under common biochemical assay conditions. (46) Adding the nonionic detergent Triton X-100 attenuates the activity of 1 versus AmpC β-lactamase (IC50 from 12 μM to >30 μM), malate dehydrogenase (IC50 from 9 μM to >30 μM), and HIV-2 protease (IC50 from 9 μM to >100 μM). This pattern is consistent with chemical aggregation and has been further confirmed by DLS (dynamic light scattering). (46, 78) These studies describe a critical aggregation concentration between 10 and 20 μM for compound 1. This is highly relevant because it corresponds to common compound testing concentrations in many of the investigational assays we encountered. Enzymatic inhibition by colloidal aggregates is stoichiometric, meaning that at a given compound concentration, the real concentration of enzyme is much lower. Once a chemical colloid is saturated with protein (be it enzyme or carrier protein), any unbound enzyme is free to react in the assay system. (79, 80) Consequently, apparent in vitro selectivity can be influenced by the relative protein concentrations in selectivity counterscreens (i.e., all proteins present: enzyme, carrier, and substrate proteins) and does not always reflect selectivity via traditional compound–ligand interactions. This also means that counterscreens with excess enzyme may appear less susceptible to aggregating compounds, helping to identify this circumstance. These phenomena deserve special consideration when designing experiments that include detergent-free assays.
In the event that the observed activity is not found to be due to assay interference, the instability of compound 1 calls into question the identity of the “active” compound. (45) It is important to consider the cellular location of the target protein, as 1 has been shown to perturb cell membranes. This can lead to membrane perturbation being mistaken for specific binding to membrane-associated proteins. (47) This could have significant ramifications for many reported activities, including those for ion channels, transporters, and growth factors. Beyond these factors, the fluorescence properties of 1 must also be taken into account in many biological experiments. The absorbance (∼408–500 nm) and emission (∼450–600 nm) of 1 varies greatly depending on solvent, but largely falls within the range of wavelengths common for many fluorescence-based bioassays. (48, 81)
Other physicochemical properties of 1 are important considerations when developing assays or evaluating druglike properties. Notably, 1 is nearly insoluble in water at room temperature and neutral pH, estimated at 1–10 μg/mL. This can only be viewed as an estimate, however, as the true solubility is confounded by the high propensity for aggregation. (64) Both the estimated ClogP (2.3–3.2) and topological polar surface area (93.1 A2) fall in the range of known chemical aggregators. (78) X-ray crystallography studies with compound 1 also confirm its rapid degradation in aqueous media. Crystallization of 1 with transthyretin revealed both the parent compound and compound 6 (a known degradation product) associated with the protein. (77) When considering molecular modeling, studies based on both the diketone (1a) and enol (1b) forms have been reported but fail to recognize the complete lack of solubility of one form (1a, diketone) and the complete instability of the other (1b, enol).
Beyond the concerns of chemical and physicochemical stability, compounds taken in vivo require appropriate PK/PD properties. Next, we highlight several concerns that should be addressed when using compound 1 in vivo.

ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicology)

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

In addition to the poor chemical stability and multiple modes of assay interference displayed by compound 1, it is generally accepted that its pharmacokinetic properties are poor. (7, 82)

Absorption

The absorption of any potential therapeutic is a critical consideration, especially for oral dosing. Several studies, including clinical trials, have been performed using curcumin in a variety of oral dosing formulations. An oral dose of up to 12 g/day has been given with no adverse effects. (83) While this high dose was relatively well tolerated, the absorption of the compound is negligible. All clinical studies reviewed here reported that 1 could not be detected in the serum of the majority of test subjects (including those dosed at 12 g/day). This is not surprising, as the reported oral bioavailability of synthetic 1 in rats is less than 1%. (28) Moreover, compound 1 has displayed poor permeability in the standard Caco-2 model system (Papp = 3.18 × 10–6 ± 1.08 × 10–6 cm/s), (84) which is a widely accepted predictor of cell permeability (poorly permeable compounds have Papp < 5.0 × 10–6 cm/s). (85) Several groups have attempted to improve the absorption and bioavailability of 1 through various formulations. We note that lipid dispersions and nanoparticle systems have been developed for 1, with modest improvement in the absorption and bioavailability of the compound. (82)

Distribution

The extent to which a compound distributes through the body has a large impact on its therapeutic utility. While the distribution of compound 1 has been extensively studied in rats, it has only been sparingly evaluated in humans. Several studies in rodent models have reported variable distribution across tissue types. (9, 82, 86) This high degree of variability is likely due to (1) differences in the preparation of the dose used in the study, (2) differences in extraction, preparation, and detection methods of 1, and (3) lack of specificity in the detection assay. Many assays we analyzed in the literature utilized HPLC-based detection without the added specificity of confirmation of identity by MS. These methods inherently have larger amounts of error as biological impurities, and degraded or transformed compounds could have similar retention times and absorbance properties as the parent compound. In fact, a study comparing the distribution of [3H]-1 to unlabeled 1 found substantially more radioactivity in tissues compared to the amount of unlabeled 1. This result supports the observation that 1 is degraded and/or transformed before and/or after absorption. (87, 88) Together, these studies suggest that the parent compound does not distribute to any specific organs in appreciable levels.

Metabolism

In part due to its reactive structure, any 1 that is absorbed by the body has a high potential to be metabolized. Extensive studies have been done on 1 in human liver microsomes. Phase I metabolism primarily results in reduction of the double bonds in the heptadienedione system, mainly through the action of alcohol dehydrogenase. (82) Phase II metabolic processes rapidly conjugate 1 and its reduced metabolites. The most abundant conjugates are glucuronides and sulfates at the phenolic positions. Unsurprisingly, 1 also interacts readily with glutathione in a nonenzymatic manner, presumably through a Michael-type addition. (89) Some of the formulations investigated to improve the oral bioavailability of 1 also hope to slow down the observed high rate of metabolism upon absorption. Unfortunately, it appears that once 1 is released in vivo, it has a high potential for modification by both first and second phase metabolism.

Excretion

The majority of 1 ingested by oral dosing is excreted in the feces, as determined in multiple studies in rats. Very little is detected in rodent urine; however glucuronide and sulfate metabolites have been identified in rat plasma. (88, 90) There are conflicting reports regarding the excretion of 1 and its metabolites in human subjects. In one study, neither the parent compound nor its metabolites were detected in blood or urine of human subjects after oral dosing, but 1 was recovered from feces. (91) In two other studies, 1 (92) or one of its metabolites (93) was detected in serum of one or three patients from each cohort of 12 or 15 patients, respectively. In a fourth study, 1 was detected in serum of only one subject, but the glucuronide and sulfate conjugates were detected in all subjects. (94) Similar to the reports of absorption, some of this variability in reporting likely comes from variability in the source material and methods of dosing and sample collection, preparation, and detection. Small amounts of compound 1 may be absorbed and excreted unchanged or, if we consider other physicochemical properties (vide supra), may not be absorbed but simply pass directly to the feces. Metabolized 1 is generally excreted in urine as the glucuronide and sulfate conjugates. The remainder of any dose, whether absorbed or not, is likely degraded beyond detection by the time it is excreted.

Toxicology. (7, 95-98)

In addition to the therapeutic targets discussed below, 1 (and its degradation products) shows broad reactivity against a number of human enzymes that are linked to compound toxicity, namely, hERG channels, cytochrome P450s, and glutathione S-transferase (see also Supporting Information Table 3). The reactivity of each of these classes has important implications for potential toxic side effects: hERG channel inhibition is related to cardiotoxicity; (99-101) cytochrome P450 (CYP450) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) inhibition can lead to impaired detoxification and potential toxic drug–drug contraindications. (102) Beyond specific enzyme toxicity, compound 1 has recently been shown to be an active iron chelator in vivo, inducing a state of overt iron deficiency in mice fed diets poor in iron. (44) This suggests that 1 has the potential to affect systemic iron metabolism, particularly in people with a preexisting suboptimal iron status. In studies of therapeutic utility, 1 has been reported as cytotoxic against a number of important cancer cell lines. What is infrequently noted, however, is that it also shows cytotoxicity against normal human lymphocytes. (31) Surprisingly, data on the cytotoxicity of 1 against normal (noncancerous) cell lines are sparse. A recent report demonstrated cytotoxicity of 1 against a murine macrophage cell line and human kidney cells at IC50 values of 31 and 15.2 μM, respectively. (8) These values are at or below those reported for several therapeutic targets or cell lines (see also Supporting Information Tables 1 and 3), suggesting that 1 might be generally cytotoxic and does not show a preference for normal versus cancerous cells.

ADMET Summary

The observed ADMET properties of 1 are not surprising given its chemical structure and physicochemical properties. The numerous papers that suggest 1 has utility as a therapeutic agent have led to a large field of study focusing on the improvement of its PK properties. We would emphasize caution, however, as such improvement in PK may actually lead to exacerbation of the toxicological side effects of 1, given its cytotoxic effects. (8) Fundamental medicinal chemistry principles, and available ADMET evidence, incline us to hypothesize that the observed high tolerance in humans and low rate of adverse events is likely due to its poor absorption and low bioavailability. As an alternative approach, it may be possible for compound 1 to have an effect on human health without being absorbed. Emerging research suggests that 1 could affect the gut microbiota, which has been linked to several chronic diseases. (7) A recent study using a mouse model of colitis-associated colorectal cancer suggests that compound 1 may have a chemopreventive effect that is correlated to changes in the microbiota of these animals. (103) This hypothesis has yet to be fully validated but may ultimately provide focus for studies on the use of 1 as a therapeutic.

Critical Analysis of Some Reported Activities of Curcumin (Real and Virtual) (104, 105)

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Compound 1 is reported to be active at multiple biological targets. What is not typically acknowledged in these focused studies is that it is nonselective for what could be considered “good” versus “bad” targets (vide supra). A comprehensive discussion of the structure–activity (and reactivity) of 1 has been published. (106) In summary, every functional group in 1 probably contributes to its reactivity and its apparent activity. For example, it is not surprising that compound 1 covalently modifies a number of biological proteins given that its two α,β-unsaturated systems are potent Michael acceptors for −SH groups with low pKa values. Additionally, the two phenolic groups are susceptible to redox transformations, and the 1,3-dicarbonyl is an excellent chelator of metal ions. It is important to consider the reported activities of 1 in light of these reactive functional groups in addition to the other properties detailed above. Examples of this critical consideration are presented below as case studies (see also Supporting Information Table 1). One common theme in these reports is particularly disturbing: published bioactivity data of 1 are typically not evaluated critically before it is used to justify further research in an area. This is especially troubling when the original activity reports have been retracted. (107-112)

Activity Case Studies

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

p300

Compound 1 is reported to inhibit the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) p300 at low micromolar concentrations in vitro. (11, 113) In one of these original studies, counterscreens failed to show any activity versus the HAT PCAF, the histone methyltransferase G9a, or the histone deacetylase HDAC1. (113) Since the original publication of this bioactivity, there have been dozens of reports that have used 1 as a tool compound to modulate HATs in cell-based and organism-based experiments across many biological systems: (114) mouse neuroblastoma cells, (115) parasites, (116) viruses, (117) and a variety of human cell lines. (118-121) Several points should be made about the original data. (113) First, in vitro testing was performed without detergent and often at compound concentrations above the threshold for colloid formation (vide supra). It is reasonable that aggregates of 1 could have contributed to the in vitro assay readouts and perhaps the apparent selectivity (e.g., enzymatic modulation by chemical aggregation can be mitigated by increased levels of proteins). Second, 1 was allowed to preincubate with the targets in most of the assays. (113) Given its reported instability in aqueous solutions, it is difficult to draw conclusions about the nature of compound–target interactions without additional stability data under these specific testing conditions. Third, another report showed that radiolabeled 1 binds covalently to p300 in a manner consistent with Michael addition, yet failed to inhibit the HATs PCAF or Gcn5 in vitro. (11) The apparent selectivity of 1 for p300 reported nearly a decade ago may be a function of the intrinsic susceptibility of each HAT to thiol-reactive compounds. Selectivity in such a case would be a function of the thiol solvent accessibility, the number of thiols in the target protein (also the overall assay), and the protein conformational changes induced by any thiol modification. As an example, during an investigation of thiol-reactive PAINS, the highly thiol-reactive probe CPM consistently showed less potent inhibition of yeast GCN5 compared to yeast Rtt109 and human p300. (122) Fourth, several kinetic experiments were performed that suggest 1 does not bind to the p300 active site. (113) These experiments appear to be performed without ruling out reversibility or time dependence, and it is possible these kinetic results may be confounded by chemical reactivity as well as compound stability and chemical aggregation. Without question, compound 1 can inhibit p300 HAT activity in vitro based on the published data. Whether or not this inhibition is therapeutically useful, especially in a cellular context, is considerably more controversial. When phenotypes or changes in histone acetylation are observed in cells or whole organisms, these downstream effects are often attributed carte blanche to the inhibition of p300 while downplaying or outright disregarding other potential mediators of cellular histone acetylation such as HDACs or other HATs. This logic is overly simplistic and often flawed when used as supporting evidence for studying specific pathways.

HDAC8

In one report primarily driven by molecular modeling studies, compound 1 was reported to inhibit HDAC8 at midmicromolar compound concentrations (IC50 = 115 μM). (123) On the basis of the title (“potent histone deacetylase inhibitors”), one may be led into thinking 1 could serve as a tool compound for epigenetic studies. As in the p300 example, the relevant in vitro assays omit detergent to mitigate chemical aggregate formation, a potential confounder that is highly likely in this system given the relatively high compound concentrations tested. In addition, the enzyme source from which the IC50 value was derived, HeLa nuclear extracts, should contain multiple HDACs, making it impossible to confidently gauge HDAC8-specific inhibition. No controls were performed to account for readout interference, such as fluorescence quenching or autofluorescence. Orthogonal counterscreens are absent, and there is no evidence presented for direct target engagement (e.g., ITC, X-ray crystallography, or SPR). The heavy reliance on molecular modeling is problematic, including the reporting of theoretical binding constants. Despite these liabilities, subsequent reports cite curcumin for its ability to specifically modulate HDACs. (124-126)

GSK-3β

Compound 1 is reported to be a potent inhibitor of GSK-3β (IC50 = 66 nM). (127) However, detailed analysis of the in vitro testing conditions may help rationalize this level of potency. First, the reported concentration of GSK-3β protein present in the assay was in the femtomolar range, meaning several orders of magnitude stoichiometric excess of compound 1 are still needed to appreciably inhibit GSK-3β activity. Second, the biochemical assay was performed in the absence of thiol-scavenging agents like DTT, meaning 1, or any potential degradation products, could still react with the assay target or substrate. Third, as with previous examples, the assays were performed with incubation times sufficient for compound degradation (30–90 min), (127) without meaningful counterscreens for selectivity and without mechanistic studies to demonstrate therapeutically useful target engagement. In retrospect, the heavy reliance on molecular modeling is problematic without confirmation of compound stability in the assay conditions. Nevertheless, curcumin is still the subject of numerous studies involving GSK-3β. (128-131)

Tau and Amyloid Fibril Formation

Compound 1 was tested as an inhibitor of tau fibril formation as part of the NIH MLPCN (Molecular Libraries Probe Centers Network) campaign. The tested substance showed promising activity in the primary thioflavin T (ThT) fluorescence-based qHTS (IC50 = 3.5 μM). However, it was inactive in a fluorescence polarization (FP) based secondary screen. Compound 1 was still active in a counterscreen for total fluorescence (IC50 = 13 μM), suggesting its activity was due in large part to compound-mediated fluorescence interference. For these reasons, it was not selected for additional follow-up based on these data. This example demonstrates the utility of a well-designed screening tree, complete with secondary assays and assay-specific counterscreens. (132)
Additionally, 1 has been reported as an inhibitor of amyloid-β (Aβ) fibril formation and mediator of Aβ cytotoxicity, also using the ThT assay as a primary readout (IC50 = 1–64 μM). (7, 133) Subsequent publications have shown that 1 is highly absorptive in the same spectral range as ThT. (134) Most recently, transmission electron microscopy has shown that compound 1 does not affect the aggregation of Aβ in vitro. (135) This report attempts to explain the observed cellular protective effects by showing that the oligomers formed by Aβ in the presence of 1 are nontoxic; i.e., the polyclonal antibody A11, which is reported to specifically detect toxic Aβ oligomers, does not detect these oligomers. (136) However, the extremely long incubation times reported here would require follow-up to exclude the likely possibility of aggregation or degradation in the assay conditions. (137)

CFTR (Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator)

In 2004, compound 1 was reported as a calcium-adenosine triphosphatase pump inhibitor for the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF). (138) The compound was tested in a mouse model based on previously reported in vitro activity (5–15 μM) in a related SERCA (sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium) pump assay. The assay readout required the release of ΔF508-CFTR protein from the endoplasmic reticulum, which would increase calcium ion flux, a process that is known to be deficient in CF patients. These studies were followed by an investigation using a mouse model that expresses mutant CFTR, which showed that a dose of 45 mg kg–1 day–1 oral administration of 1 ameliorated phenotypic deficits in these mice. However, no orthogonal assay was used to confirm target engagement, and there was no confirmation of 1 in the blood of these animals. The improvement of ion channel conductance in these studies could be largely due to the disruption of cellular membranes by 1 (vide supra), thereby increasing ion release. Follow-up studies by an independent lab were unable to reproduce these in vitro and in vivo results. (139) The measured concentration of 1 in vivo peaked at 60 nM, 30 min after oral dosing at 100 mg/kg, but was not detectable below this dosing level. While publications continue to point to compound 1 as a CFTR modulator as a potential CF treatment, (140) no confirmation of CFTR activity has been published.

CB1

In 2009, compound 1 was reported as a potent, selective inhibitor of human and mouse cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1). (141) The initial report should raise some concern as the assay had a 90 min incubation time of 1 with the receptor at room temperature, conditions known to result in rapid compound degradation (vide supra). These results are, therefore, confounded minimally by the formation of degradation products. In addition, there is no orthogonal evidence presented of direct target engagement. Approximately six months after the publication of these results, the manuscript was retracted. (142) According to the letter of retraction, both the authors and three external labs were unable to reproduce the original results. In repeated experiments, compound 1 was a low micromolar inhibitor of both CB1 and CB2 and showed no selectivity. The original authors hypothesized that their results were due to sample contamination by their CB1 control compound. Unfortunately, articles are still published that cite the originally reported activity and selectivity of 1 for CB1, without acknowledgment of the subsequent retraction. (143)

Overview of Literature Reports of Curcumin Activity

A critical review of the literature reveals several major themes whenever novel bioactivity has been attributed to 1: (1) bioactivity was often observed at low micromolar to midmicromolar compound concentrations, typically above the critical aggregation concentration threshold for 1; (2) appropriate counterscreens for assay interference were frequently not performed, and target engagement was not confirmed nor was target selectivity; (3) nearly all the manuscripts reviewed failed to consider the stability of the compound; (4) finally, weak yet desired phenotypes, often observed at relatively high compound concentrations, were taken to “validate” specific target engagement but without sufficient evidence to rule out off-target effects. Such critical review of any reported activity requires a thorough understanding of the medicinal chemistry properties of 1 (vide supra).

Critical Evaluation of Clinical Trials

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Most researchers currently consider compound 1 as a dietary supplement, and the FDA does not support claims regarding its therapeutic utility. For it to achieve a level of documented therapeutic utility in the United States, researchers will need to show that it is safe and effective for its intended use. While the essential oils and oleoresins of turmeric are recognized as GRAS substances, (144)1 is not on any readily accessible FDA GRAS list. When one company requested GRAS designation for a proprietary preparation of a mixture of curcuminoids, the FDA responded that it “has no questions at this time regarding (the company’s) conclusion that curcuminoids is [sic] GRAS under the intended conditions” (inclusion in baked goods; soups; snack foods; imitation dairy products; and seasoning and flavors at use levels up to 20 mg curcumin/serving) but that the agency “has not, however, made its own determination regarding the GRAS status of the subject use of curcuminoids”. (34)
Adverse events are rarely observed when curcuminoid preparations are dosed orally in humans, though some adverse reactions have occurred when large doses (8–12 g/day) necessary to provide “adequate systemic exposure” were administered orally. For example, a phase I dose-escalation study was carried out where three subjects in each of eight cohorts were treated with a single dose of a commercial milled curcumin mixture (95% curcuminoids with 70–80% 1, 15–25% 3, and 2.5–6.5% 4), (145) over a range escalating from 500 mg to 12 g. Compound 1 was only detected in the serum of 2/6 subjects taking the single doses of 10 or 12 g. (83) A peak serum level of 57.6 ng/mL (156 nmol/L) was measured at 2 h in the one individual who received the single 12 g dose. (For comparison, the Cmax for a 10 mg dose of atorvastatin is 2.81 ng/mL.) (146) Adverse events in this study were diarrhea, rash, or headache. These events occurred in 30% of the trial participants, but did not appear to be dose related. In a longitudinal Phase I study of curcumin dosing, 15 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were administered 0.45 to 3.6 g daily of the same commercial mixture of curcuminoids described above for up to four months. (147) In this case, 1 was found in the blood of 3/6 of the patients receiving the highest dose (11.1 ± 0.22 ng/mL, converted from the reported 0.6 nmol/L, at the 1 h time point on days 1, 2, 8, and 29), but not in the other nine subjects who received lower doses. Sulfate (8.9 ± 0.7 nmol/L) and glucuronide (15.8 ± 0.9 nmol/L) conjugates were found in all six of the subjects taking the 3.6 g daily dose, though there was no obvious difference in metabolite levels between those high-dose subjects in which 1 was found and in those in which it was not present. Notably “decreases in tumor markers or serum cholesterol were not observed as a result of treatment in any of the patients”, and “three significant changes in quality of life scores were reported: one patient noticed a significant improvement after one month of treatment, and two patients deteriorated after two months of treatment, both of whom were found to have radiologic progressive disease.” Mild diarrhea was the only sign of toxicity observed. In the present discussion, the significance of these phase I studies is two-fold. First, large amounts of 1 appear to be fairly well tolerated, suggesting that the use of curcuminoids or turmeric as an herbal supplement at lower doses is probably benign. Second, even at what might be considered the maximum-tolerated dose from the standpoint of pill consumption, (148) we note that 1 has a variable and extremely low systemic bioavailability when dosed orally.
Beyond these primarily PK in vivo studies, 1 has a long history of being the subject of human PD clinical trials. The first article to report its use as a human therapeutic was in 1937. (149-152) None of these studies have yet led to the approval of 1, curcuminoids, or turmeric as a therapeutic for any disease. According to the United States NIH, (153) currently (from 2001 to the present) there are 135 registered clinical trials that have evaluated or will evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of curcuminoids in the treatment of a broad spectrum of diseases. Of the 135 trials, eight have reported study results. Forty-nine studies are listed as “recruiting” or “not yet recruiting”. It is beyond the scope of this work to compile, categorize, or analyze the results of all of these trials. We will, however, review the results of four archetypical clinical trials that illustrate the lack of significant success in this area. These trials were selected because data were reported on clinicaltrials.gov, and the therapeutic utility of 1 for these diseases is often referenced in manuscripts as validating its continued study.

Radiation Dermatitis

A recent example (2011–2014, NCT01246973) advanced to phase II/III and evaluated the administration of oral curcuminoids for the treatment of radiation-induced dermatitis in 686 women undergoing radiotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer. The objective “was to study the efficacy of curcumin in preventing and/or reducing the severity of dermatitis in radiation treatment site in breast cancer patients”. The treatment group took four commercially produced 500 mg curcuminoid mixture capsules (2.0 g) orally three times daily (6.0 g/day) throughout the course of radiation treatment plus one adjuvant week, while a placebo group received placebo capsules. To summarize, the study results appear inconclusive. The radiation dermatitis score (RDS, 0–4 with higher numbers indicating worse outcome) was used as a measure of the severity of the dermatitis. The RDS for the 283 patients who completed the curcumin arm of the study was 2.02 ± 0.05, while that of the placebo group was 1.99 ± 0.06. This result is perhaps not surprising, given the low oral bioavailability of compound 1. To our knowledge these data have not yet been published.

Colon Cancer

A phase IIa study evaluated the efficacy of curcumin in preventing colon cancer in smokers with aberrant crypt foci (NCT00365209). In stage 1 of this trial, 23 enrolled patients (21 completed the trial) received 2 g/day of a curcumin preparation. In stage 2, 21 additional subjects (19 completed) received 4 g/day of the curcumin preparation. In both cases the trial was continued for 30 days in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. One important outcome measure was post-treatment concentration of compound 1 in rectal mucosa. In the stage 1 cohort, 5/21 subjects had detectable levels of 1 (8.2 ± 2.9 μg/g of protein), and in the stage 2 group, 3/18 subjects had detectable levels of 1 (3.8 ± 0.6 μg/g of protein). Additionally, compound 1 was observed in 2/19 subjects in stage 2 (3.8 ± 1.3 μg/mL). One key outcome measure was the change in total aberrant crypt foci number. The median change in stage 1 was 0.0 (range, −18 to 15) and was 6.0 in stage 2 (range, −1 to 14). While no statistical analysis was reported, there was no overall change in the stage 1 group (0.0) and very modest change in the stage 2 group (6.0). For clinical context, a change of 6.0 may move a patient from “normal” to “precancerous” or from “precancerous” to “cancerous”, but this will often result in no change in patient designation. (3, 154) To our knowledge, these data have not yet been published.

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)

The results of a phase II 24-week, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial (2004–2008) studying the tolerability and efficacy of oral curcumin were reported in 2012. (145) This trial was based on extensive preclinical experiments demonstrating that 1 reduced Aβ-induced toxicity in vitro and reduced markers of central nervous system oxidative stress in Tg2576 APPsw mice. In this study, human subjects (average age 74 years) received placebo, 2 g, or 4 g of a commercial curcuminoid mixture in two daily oral doses. PK sampling was performed using HPLC (lower limit of detection (LLOD), 200 ng/mL of 1) at baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h postdose at 24 weeks and by LC/MS/MS (LLOD 1 ng/mL compound 1; 3 ng/mL, tetrahydrocurcumin) at baseline and 3 h postdose at 24 weeks. As might be expected based on our previous ADMET discussion, 1 was not found by HPLC analysis in any patient plasma sample, save one sample taken 4 h after a 4 g dose (6 ng/mL, below the assay LLOD). With more sensitive LC/MS/MS methods, the mean baseline level of 1 at 24 weeks was 2.67 ± 1.69 ng/mL, while that of tetrahydrocurcumin was 6.86 ± 1.69 ng/mL. Three hours post-treatment, the mean plasma levels were as follows: compound 1 (7.76 ± 3.23 ng/mL), tetrahydrocurcumin (3.73 ± 2.0 ng/mL), glucuronidated 1 (96.05 ± 26 ng/mL), and glucuronidated tetrahydrocurcumin (298.2 ± 140.0 ng/mL). After 24 weeks of treatment, there was no observed difference in mental status between the placebo and treated groups based on several measurements of cognitive status such as ADAS-Cog or mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores. While no serious adverse events were reported, almost all (>90%) of the control and experimental subjects reported adverse events such as diarrhea, joint pain, and complaints attributed to endocrine system effects. The plasma glucose levels in the treated subjects were statistically higher than those of the placebo subjects, though not outside a normal range. The potential of compound 1 as a neurotherapeutic has been extensively reviewed, and it was concluded (our notes italicized):
“It seems debatable to further pursue the supplementation of high concentrations of curcumin in humans. Instead, in line with the concepts of promising alternative mechanisms such as neurohormesis (Note: a mechanism by which the therapeutic effects of low doses of substances are amplified by stimulation of endogenous, beneficial biochemical pathways (155)) and the gut microbiota as primary targets of curcumin to mediate neuroprotection, low doses of curcumin should be considered in future in clinical trial design.” (7)
Another more recent review (156) stated that there is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of curcumin in dementia patients and that its low bioavailability and poor study design could explain the apparent discrepancies between in vitro and human clinical trial results.
The results of an epidemiological study comparing the low incidence of AD in Ballabgarh, a rural community in northern India, to a cohort of subjects in the rural mid-Monongahela Valley of Pennsylvania is often cited as evidence that a diet containing turmeric (of which 1 is a minor component) is beneficial. (157) However, even the authors of the oft-cited study cautioned against overinterpretation of their results given the relatively short duration of the study, the small number of incident cases, and the wide confidence intervals. Diet was not considered as part of the study, and the frequency of the APOE4 allele, a risk factor for AD, was noted as being lower in the Ballabgarh group (0.073) as compared to the Monongahela Valley group (0.11). Another frequently cited study (158) used to support the impact of curcumin on AD measured the cognitive function of 1010 nondemented, elderly subjects (Singapore National Mental Health Survey) compared to their self-reported ingestion of curry (containing turmeric spice; 1–6% curcuminoids). (159) Various ethnic versions of the MMSE were used to compare the cognitive status of those who consumed curry “never or rarely”, “occasionally”, or “often” (Table 1).
Table 1. Data Relating Cognitive Function of Nondemented Elderly Subjects and Their Self-Reported Curry Consumption (158),a
    unadjusted (MMSE)b adjusted (MMSE)c
curry consumption no. subjects mean 95% CI mean 95% CI
never or rarely 163 24.9 24.2, 25.7 23.3 21.2, 25.4
occasionally 411 26.2 25.8, 26.6 24.8 22.9, 26.7
often 436 25.0 25.6, 26.4 24.8 22.9, 26.6
ANOVA   p = 0.004 p = 0.023
a

Cognitive function was evaluated using various ethnic versions of the MMSE scores for each group.

b

Unweighted sample estimates.

c

Weighted least-squares regression estimates adjusted for age, education, gender, ethnicity, etc. (20 variables total).

According to the study authors, “although the results are suggestive of a biological therapeutic effect, we emphasize that they do not establish a clear and direct causal effect of curry consumption on improving cognitive function.” The difference in MMSE between those who rarely use turmeric and those that often use it is not significant. (160)

Pancreatic Cancer

A phase II study of the use of curcuminoids in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer was reported in 2008. (148) This study used encapsulated curcuminoids in a form that contained 90% compound 1, 8% of 3, and 2% of 4. Patients started at a dose of 8 g/day and took oral curcuminoids daily for at least 8 weeks. The dosing regimen was then continued if their disease had stabilized. Twenty-one of the 25 subjects initially enrolled were evaluable for response at the end of the study. At the time of publication, one patient had remained stable for more than 18 months and another single patient had a brief but marked 73% reduction in tumor size that lasted one month. One other patient remained enrolled in the study for approximately eight months with “stable weight and a feeling of well-being, albeit with progression in non-target lesions”. Only low levels of 1 were detectable in plasma (∼22–41 ng/mL at steady state on day 3). No treatment-related toxic effects were reported.

Clinical Trials Review Summary

The aforementioned clinical trials were discussed because they are representative of many other studies for which outcome data are not (yet) available. Given its low systemic bioavailability, we remain highly skeptical that an oral dose of 1 can ever be effective in human clinical trials that are translated from reports of in vitro activity. Disagreements regarding the importance of alternative therapeutic mechanisms like neurohormesis notwithstanding, it is hard to formulate reasonable justification for studying lower oral doses of curcuminoids given that even at high doses compound 1 is not found in the serum of test subjects. The transformation of 1 to potentially active metabolites in the gut and the related influence on the gut microbiota (vide supra) (103) seems to be reasonable areas of study as no absorption of the parent compound is necessary. Still, the lack of any observed efficacy of oral curcuminoids in clinical trials where it was given in high doses does not bode well for these alternative hypotheses of therapeutic efficacy.

Conclusions: Future Curcumin Research

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The vast number of manuscripts published on the biological activity of curcumin makes it all but impossible for researchers to keep up with the state-of-the-art in the field. Herein, an attempt has been made to present an overview of the medicinal chemistry research that will be helpful for researchers and reviewers to consider in their respective roles. At first, curcumin appeared to offer great potential for the development of a therapeutic from a NP (turmeric) that is classified as a GRAS material. (144) Unfortunately, no form of curcumin, or its closely related analogues, appears to possess the properties required for a good drug candidate (chemical stability, high water solubility, potent and selective target activity, high bioavailability, broad tissue distribution, stable metabolism, and low toxicity). The in vitro interference properties of curcumin do, however, offer many traps that can trick unprepared researchers into misinterpreting the results of their investigations.
The observations of this Miniperspective offer several key points that can help identify potentially problematic research approaches and/or interpretation of outcomes in publications or preliminary data involving curcumin bioactivity. Notably, many of these strategies have been articulated previously: (122, 161)
1.

Look for evidence of compound stability in assay buffer/media, including when molecular models are invoked as supporting evidence of target engagement.

2.

Look for the presence of detergent and thiol-scavenging reagents in biochemical assays to mitigate the impact of chemical aggregation and nonspecific thiol reactivity. Are/were any additional counterscreens performed to rule out these phenomena?

3.

Examine the selectivity data. What are the magnitudes of any observed selectivity? Are these significant? Can any selectivity be explained by differential target susceptibilities to nonspecific interference modalities like thiol reactivity? Can any apparent selectivity be explained by the assay conditions, such as target or total protein concentration?

4.

Examine the potency of the compound. At those concentrations, would there be any expected aggregation or off-target effects? And if so, can one make meaningful conclusions about specific pathways and target engagement? Does the stoichiometry make sense?

5.

Evaluate the methods to confirm target engagement. Look for biophysical orthogonal methods for support of target engagement (e.g., SPR, ITC, CETSA), not solely phenotypic assays.

6.

Carefully examine the detection method for determining the concentration of 1 present in an assay. What biophysical method is/was used for detection? Can likely degradation products or metabolites have a similar response and/or explain the data/hypothesis?

With respect to curcumin/curcuminoids and in vivo studies and clinical trials, we believe there is rather “much ado about nothing”. Certainly, the low systemic exposure levels reported in clinical trials do not support its further investigation as a therapeutic. Circumventing the requirement for systemic circulation, curcumin might provide benefit by acting on gut microbiota. Thus far, there is limited evidence to support this hypothesis, which will also limit the utility of this delivery method. Delivery systems such as lipid vesicles, nanoparticles, and nanofibers might be able to boost the bioavailability of 1, but this could also conceivably narrow its therapeutic window and lead to off-target toxicity by aforementioned processes. Available evidence demonstrates curcumin will ultimately degrade upon release into physiologic media, no matter the delivery mechanism. Analogues of 1 might address some of the delivery challenges but would be new chemical entities and would have to proceed through expensive preclinical work to be approved for clinical trials. In our opinion, analogues of curcumin are based on a fairly weak foundation.
Of course, we do not rule out the possibility that an extract of crude turmeric might have beneficial effects on human health. The large RC of NP extracts, and even of refined NP preparations, makes the identification of the active constituent(s) and evaluation of their efficacy in humans very difficult. (51, 162) Considering the overwhelming evidence showing the weakness of isolated curcumin (almost always a mixture of curcuminoids) as a viable therapeutic, consideration of holistic approaches that take into account the chemical and PD/PK complexity of turmeric and its broad TxM/nutritional foundation appears to be superior directions for future research in the turmeric domain. While the concepts of static and dynamic RC apply equally to synthetically prepared compounds, the development of leads sourced from metabolomic (natural) sources is intrinsically more prone to the impact of purity (and unknown impurities). In some ways, the oversimplification of this complexity has led to complicatedness that makes it difficult to interpret results of curcumin-based studies. (142, 143) In addition, there is increasing evidence that TxM agents cannot be adequately described with reductionist pharmacology models but require consideration of polypharmacology and synergy. (163) The recent recognition of IMPS (4) adds to the uniqueness of natural products by identifying panacea-type substances that establish a new dimension of biological signatures generated by bioactive molecules. Curcumin is not the only potential IMP that has received much attention by the scientific community as a drug lead. Development projects with numerous other prominent plant natural products (e.g., polyphenolics) have experienced similar drawbacks despite major efforts. As shown here for curcumin, the essential medicinal chemistry of natural products that were developed into drugs successfully, and as almost unaltered structures (e.g., artemisinin, camptothecin, taxol, ivermectin, etc.), differs significantly from those of potential IMPS. This orthogonal perspective on the druggability of NPs is further supported by the metabolic feedback hypothesis, (164) which states that bioactivity, especially of many food-borne phytochemicals, can act via weak negative biological feedback mechanisms, escaping in vitro detection and blurring our understanding of mechanisms of action. Collectively, recognition of these factors may remove complicatedness from ongoing research while inspiring the development of out-of-the-box approaches to unraveling the complexity and potential health benefits of turmeric and other NPs.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00975.

  • Supplemental Tables 1, 2, and 3 of assays, half-lives, and activities, along with a discussion of covalent protein modification by 1 (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • Michael A. Walters - Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Institute for Therapeutics Discovery and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414, United States Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Kathryn M. Nelson - Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Institute for Therapeutics Discovery and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-2064
    • Jayme L. Dahlin - Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
    • Jonathan Bisson - Center for Natural Product Technologies, Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
    • James Graham - Center for Natural Product Technologies, Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
    • Guido F. Pauli - Center for Natural Product Technologies, Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United StatesInstitute for Tuberculosis Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-1022-4326
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Biographies

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Kathryn M. Nelson

Kathryn M. Nelson is a Research Associate at the Institute for Therapeutics Discovery and Development at the University of Minnesota (UMN) in Minneapolis, MN. She graduated from the UMN College of Pharmacy in 2013, where she received her Ph.D. in Medicinal Chemistry. Her doctoral thesis work focused on the development of novel antitubercular agents and chemical tools for biological target identification. Her current research interests include development of new Alzheimer’s therapeutics, assay development and triage, and the development of new chemical tools for target interrogation.

Jayme L. Dahlin

Jayme L. Dahlin is a Resident Physician in Clinical Pathology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, MA. He graduated from the Mayo Clinic Medical Scientist Training Program in 2016, where he received his Ph.D. in Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics from Mayo Graduate School and his M.D. from Mayo Medical School. His doctoral thesis work focused on chemical mechanisms of assay interference in high-throughput screening (HTS) and early drug discovery. His current research interests include HTS and triage, bioassay promiscuity, and assay development.

Jonathan Bisson

Jonathan Bisson obtained an M.S. degree in Structural Biochemistry and started his phytochemistry journey under the mentorship of Dr. Vincent Dumontet at the Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. He then obtained a Ph.D. in Science, Technology and Health from the University of Bordeaux, France under the mentorship of Dr. Pierre Waffo-Téguo, specializing in methodology at the chemistry–biology interface. In 2013, he joined the University of Illinois at Chicago, where he is currently a Postdoctoral Research Associate, developing new methods and tools for natural products research in interdisciplinary programs, mainly through data analysis, NMR, and chromatographic approaches related to promiscuous natural products (IMPS). Recently, he has been involved in the redesign of the NAPRALERT database.

James Graham

James Graham received a B.S. in Chemistry in 1994 from the University of Pittsburgh, followed by a Ph.D. in Pharmacognosy in 2001, as a protégé of Norman R. Farnsworth at the University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy (UIC-COP). Following an NIH postdoctoral fellowship in Miami and a stint as Technical Officer at the World Health Organization in Geneva, he returned to UIC-COP in 2007, where he is currently editor of the NAPRALERT database and Research Associate Professor in the Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy.

Guido F. Pauli

Guido F. Pauli is a pharmacist with a doctoral degree in Natural Products Chemistry and Pharmacognosy. As Professor and University Scholar at UIC, Chicago (IL), he is PI and collaborator in various interdisciplinary natural-product-centered research projects and Director of the Center for Natural Product Technologies. His research involves metabolome analysis of complex natural products, analytical methodology for bioactive principles, herbal dietary supplements, anti-TB drug discovery, and dental applications of natural agents. His scholarly activities involve the education of the next generation of pharmacognosist, service on pharmacopoeial expert and federal agency panels, and guest professorships. His dissemination portfolio comprises 170+ peer-reviewed journal articles as well as journal coeditorial and board functions.

Michael A. Walters

Michael A. Walters is a Research Associate Professor of Medicinal Chemistry at the University of Minnesota (UMN). He began his academic career in the Department of Chemistry at Dartmouth College and then worked at Parke-Davis and Pfizer. He is currently the Director of the Lead and Probe Discovery Group in the Institute for Therapeutics Discovery and Development at the UMN. This institute serves as a minibiotech for the development of the ideas of biomedical researchers at the UMN and Mayo Clinic. His research interests currently focus on the investigation of compound reactivity as it applies to assay interference mechanisms, the development of Alzheimer’s disease therapeutics, and new compounds to treat heart valve calcification.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

J.L.D., J.B., J.G., and G.F.P. acknowledge Dr. Brian Shoichet for helpful discussions. J.B. and G.F.P. acknowledge funding from NCCIH and ODS/NIH through Grant U41AT008706. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The opinions or assertions contained herein belong to the authors and are not necessarily the official views of the funders.

Abbreviations Used

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

AD

Alzheimer’s disease

ADMET

absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicology

AID

assay identifier

CETSA

cellular thermal shift assay

CPM

N-[4-(7-diethylamino-4-methylcoumarin-3-yl)phenyl]maleimide

DLS

dynamic light scattering

DTT

dithiolthreitol

FDA

Federal Drug Administration

FP

fluorescence polarization

GRAS

generally recognized as safe

HAT

histone acetyltransferase

HDAC

histone deacetylase

HPLC

high-performance liquid chromatography

HTS

high-throughput screening

IC50

half-maximal inhibitory concentration

IMPS

invalid (or improbable) metabolic panaceas

ITC

isothermal titration calorimetry

LLOD

lower limit of detection

ClogP

calculated partition coefficient

MLPCN

Molecular Libraries Probe Centers Network

MMSE

mini-mental state examination

NAPRALERT

natural products alert

NP

natural product

PAINS

pan assay interference compounds

NMR

nuclear magnetic resonance

PD

pharmacodynamics

PK

pharmacokinetics

RDS

radiation dermatitis score

RPMI 1640

Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium

RC

residual complexity

SPR

surface plasmon resonance

ThT

thioflavin T

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 164 other publications.

  1. 1
    Yuan, D.; Yang, X.; Guo, J. C. A great honor and a huge challenge for China: You-you tu getting the nobel prize in physiology or medicine J. Zhejiang Univ., Sci., B 2016, 17, 405 408 DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1600094
  2. 2
    Hanson, M. Is the 2015 Nobel Prize a turning point for traditional Chinese medicine? https://theconversation.com/is-the-2015-nobel-prize-a-turning-point-for-traditional-chinese-medicine-48643 (accessed June 6, 2016) .
  3. 3
    Baell, J.; Walters, M. A. Chemistry: Chemical con artists foil drug discovery Nature (London, U. K.) 2014, 513, 481 483 DOI: 10.1038/513481a
  4. 4
    Bisson, J.; McAlpine, J. B.; Friesen, J. B.; Chen, S.-N.; Graham, J.; Pauli, G. F. Can invalid bioactives undermine natural product-based drug discovery? J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 1671 1690 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01009
  5. 5
    Burgos-Moron, E.; Calderon-Montano, J. M.; Salvador, J.; Robles, A.; Lopez-Lazaro, M. The dark side of curcumin Int. J. Cancer 2010, 126, 1771 1775 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24967
  6. 6
    Baell, J. B. Feeling nature’s PAINS: Natural products, natural product drugs, and pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 616 628 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00947
  7. 7
    Chin, D.; Huebbe, P.; Pallauf, K.; Rimbach, G. Neuroprotective properties of curcumin in Alzheimer’s disease - merits and limitations Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 3955 3985 DOI: 10.2174/09298673113209990210
  8. 8
    Glaser, J.; Holzgrabe, U. Focus on PAINS: False friends in the quest for selective anti-protozoal lead structures from nature? MedChemComm 2016, 7, 214 223 DOI: 10.1039/C5MD00481K
  9. 9
    Heger, M.; van Golen, R. F.; Broekgaarden, M.; Michel, M. C. The molecular basis for the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of curcumin and its metabolites in relation to cancers Pharmacol. Rev. 2014, 66, 222 307 DOI: 10.1124/pr.110.004044
  10. 10
    Elias, G.; Jacob, P. J.; Hareeshbabu, E.; Mathew, V. B.; Krishnan, B.; Krishnakumar, K. Curcumin: Transforming the spice to a wonder drug Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2015, 6, 2671 2680 DOI: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6(7).2671-80
  11. 11
    Neckers, L.; Trepel, J.; Lee, S.; Chung, E.-J.; Lee, M.-J.; Jung, Y.-J.; Marcu, M. G. Curcumin is an inhibitor of p300 histone acetyltransferase Med. Chem. (Sharjah, United Arab Emirates) 2006, 2, 169 174 DOI: 10.2174/157340606776056133
  12. 12
    Rainey-Smith, S. R.; Brown, B. M.; Sohrabi, H. R.; Shah, T.; Goozee, K. G.; Gupta, V. B.; Martins, R. N. Curcumin and cognition: A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of community-dwelling older adults Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 115, 2106 2113 DOI: 10.1017/S0007114516001203
  13. 13
    Okamura, T.; Kubo, K. Turmeric pigment-containing chocolate with excellent flavor, texture, and hangover prevention/treatment properties. JP2009183206A, 2009.
  14. 14
    Kwon, H. N. Functional noodles for relieving hangover and its manufacturing method. KR1314917B1, 2013.
  15. 15
    Rezq, E.-S. A. M.; Mansour, M. T. A.-A.; Kumosani, T. A. Long acting conserved natural functional groups curcumin. WO2010057503A2, 2010.
  16. 16
    Wang, A.; An, X.; Zhou, Y. Application of curcumin to medicinal preparations for treating erectile dysfunction. CN101822656A, 2010.
  17. 17
    Isaacs, E.; Cobbledick, T. Complete supplement formulae for maintenance of hair growth and condition. GB2484812A, 2012.
  18. 18
    Huh, S.; Lee, J.; Jung, E.; Kim, S.-C.; Kang, J.-I.; Lee, J.; Kim, Y.-W.; Sung, Y. K.; Kang, H.-K.; Park, D. A cell-based system for screening hair growth-promoting agents Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2009, 301, 381 385 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-009-0931-0
  19. 19
    Ahluwalia, G. S.; Shander, D.; Styczynski, P. Inhibition of hair growth with protein kinase C inhibitors. WO9609806A2, 1996.
  20. 20
    Jana, S.; Paul, S.; Swarnakar, S. Curcumin as anti-endometriotic agent: Implication of MMP-3 and intrinsic apoptotic pathway Biochem. Pharmacol. (Amsterdam, Neth.) 2012, 83, 797 804 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.12.030
  21. 21
    Naz, R. K.; Lough, M. L. Curcumin as a potential non-steroidal contraceptive with spermicidal and microbicidal properties Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2014, 176, 142 148 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.01.024
  22. 22
    Data pertaining to these claims are easily accessible by any Internet search engine, e.g., https://www.google.com/#q=curcumin+AND+health+benefits
  23. 23
    Goel, A.; Kunnumakkara, A. B.; Aggarwal, B. B. Curcumin as "curecumin": From kitchen to clinic Biochem. Pharmacol. (Amsterdam, Neth.) 2008, 75, 787 809 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.08.016
  24. 24
    Kumar, A.; Chetia, H.; Sharma, S.; Kabiraj, D.; Talukdar, N. C.; Bora, U. Curcumin resource database Database 2015, 2015, bav070 DOI: 10.1093/database/bav070
  25. 25
    Wang, J.; Zhang, C.-J.; Chia, W. N.; Loh, C. C. Y.; Li, Z.; Lee, Y. M.; He, Y.; Yuan, L.-X.; Lim, T. K.; Liu, M.; Liew, C. X.; Lee, Y. Q.; Zhang, J.; Lu, N.; Lim, C. T.; Hua, Z.-C.; Liu, B.; Shen, H.-M.; Tan, K. S. W.; Lin, Q. Haem-activated promiscuous targeting of artemisinin in Plasmodium falciparum Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 10111 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10111
  26. 26
    Medhi, B.; Patyar, S.; Rao, R. S.; Byrav, D. S. P.; Prakash, A. Pharmacokinetic and toxicological profile of artemisinin compounds: An update Pharmacology 2009, 84, 323 332 DOI: 10.1159/000252658
  27. 27
    Wang, Y.-J.; Pan, M.-H.; Cheng, A.-L.; Lin, L.-I.; Ho, Y.-S.; Hsieh, C.-Y.; Lin, J.-K. Stability of curcumin in buffer solutions and characterization of its degradation products J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1997, 15, 1867 1876 DOI: 10.1016/S0731-7085(96)02024-9
  28. 28
    Yang, K. Y.; Lin, L. C.; Tseng, T. Y.; Wang, S. C.; Tsai, T. H. Oral bioavailability of curcumin in rat and the herbal analysis from Curcuma longa by LC-MS/MS J. Chromatogr. B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2007, 853, 183 189 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.03.010
  29. 29
    Chow, S.-C.; Chiu, S.-T. A note on design and analysis of clinical trials Drug Des.: Open Access 2013, 2, 102 DOI: 10.4172/2169-0138.1000102
  30. 30
    National Institutes of Health. NIH RePORTER. Research portfolio online reporting tools. Reports, data, and analysis of NIH research activities. http://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm (accessed October 6, 2016) .
  31. 31
    Kuttan, R.; Bhanumathy, P.; Nirmala, K.; George, M. C. Potential anticancer activity of turmeric (Curcuma longa) Cancer Lett. (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 1985, 29, 197 202 DOI: 10.1016/0304-3835(85)90159-4
  32. 32
    Niranjan, A.; Singh, S.; Dhiman, M.; Tewari, S. K. Biochemical composition of Curcuma longa l. Accessions Anal. Lett. 2013, 46, 1069 1083 DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2012.751541
  33. 33
    Priyadarsini, K. I. The chemistry of curcumin: From extraction to therapeutic agent Molecules 2014, 19, 20091 20112 DOI: 10.3390/molecules191220091
  34. 34
    Food and Drug Administration Office of Food Additive Safety. Agency Response Letter GRAS Notice No. Grn 000460. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2013.
  35. 35
    Majeed, S. The state of the curcumin market. Natural Products Insider; Informa Exhibitions, 2015; http://www.naturalproductsinsider.com/articles/2015/12/the-state-of-the-curcumin-market.aspx.
  36. 36
    Niranjan, A.; Prakash, D. Chemical constituents and biological activities of turmeric (Curcuma longa l.) - a review J. Food Sci. Technol. (New Delhi, India) 2008, 45, 109 116
  37. 37
    Panahi, Y.; Hosseini, M. S.; Khalili, N.; Naimi, E.; Majeed, M.; Sahebkar, A. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of curcuminoid-piperine combination in subjects with metabolic syndrome: A randomized controlled trial and an updated meta-analysis Clin. Nutr. 2015, 34, 1101 1108 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.12.019
  38. 38
    Yue, G. G.; Chan, B. C.; Hon, P. M.; Lee, M. Y.; Fung, K. P.; Leung, P. C.; Lau, C. B. Evaluation of in vitro anti-proliferative and immunomodulatory activities of compounds isolated from Curcuma longa Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 2011 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.039
  39. 39
    Hu, S.; Maiti, P.; Ma, Q.; Zuo, X.; Jones, M. R.; Cole, G. M.; Frautschy, S. A. Clinical development of curcumin in neurodegenerative disease Expert Rev. Neurother. 2015, 15, 629 637 DOI: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1044981
  40. 40
    Baell, J. B.; Holloway, G. A. New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 2719 2740 DOI: 10.1021/jm901137j
  41. 41
    Fang, J.; Lu, J.; Holmgren, A. Thioredoxin reductase is irreversibly modified by curcumin: A novel molecular mechanism for its anticancer activity J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 25284 25290 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M414645200
  42. 42
    Jurrmann, N.; Birgelius-Flohe, R.; Boel, G.-F. Curcumin blocks interleukin-1 (IL-1) signaling by inhibiting the recruitment of the IL-1 receptor-associated kinase IRAK in murine thymoma EL-4 cells J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 1859 1864
  43. 43
    Jung, Y.; Xu, W.; Kim, H.; Ha, N.; Neckers, L. Curcumin-induced degradation of ErbB2: A role for the E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP and the Michael reaction acceptor activity of curcumin Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Res. 2007, 1773, 383 390 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.11.004
  44. 44
    Chin, D.; Huebbe, P.; Frank, J.; Rimbach, G.; Pallauf, K. Curcumin may impair iron status when fed to mice for six months Redox Biol. 2014, 2, 563 569 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2014.01.018
  45. 45
    Schneider, C.; Gordon, O. N.; Edwards, R. L.; Luis, P. B. Degradation of curcumin: From mechanism to biological implications J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 7606 7614 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b00244
  46. 46
    Duan, D.; Doak, A. K.; Nedyalkova, L.; Shoichet, B. K. Colloidal aggregation and the in vitro activity of traditional Chinese medicines ACS Chem. Biol. 2015, 10, 978 988 DOI: 10.1021/cb5009487
  47. 47
    Ingolfsson, H. I.; Thakur, P.; Herold, K. F.; Hobart, E. A.; Ramsey, N. B.; Periole, X.; de Jong, D. H.; Zwama, M.; Yilmaz, D.; Hall, K.; Maretzky, T.; Hemmings, H. C., Jr.; Blobel, C.; Marrink, S. J.; Kocer, A.; Sack, J. T.; Andersen, O. S. Phytochemicals perturb membranes and promiscuously alter protein function ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 1788 1798 DOI: 10.1021/cb500086e
  48. 48
    Priyadarsini, K. I. Photophysics, photochemistry and photobiology of curcumin: Studies from organic solutions, bio-mimetics and living cells J. Photochem. Photobiol., C 2009, 10, 81 95 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2009.05.001
  49. 49
    Esatbeyoglu, T.; Ulbrich, K.; Rehberg, C.; Rohn, S.; Rimbach, G. Thermal stability, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin and its degradation product 4-vinyl guaiacol Food Funct. 2015, 6, 887 893 DOI: 10.1039/C4FO00790E
  50. 50
    Avonto, C.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O.; Pollastro, F.; Minassi, A.; Di Marzo, V.; De Petrocellis, L.; Appendino, G. An NMR spectroscopic method to identify and classify thiol-trapping agents: Revival of Michael acceptors for drug discovery? Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 467 471 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201005959
  51. 51
    Pauli, G. F.; Chen, S. N.; Friesen, J. B.; McAlpine, J. B.; Jaki, B. U. Analysis and purification of bioactive natural products: The AnaPurNa study J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 1243 1255 DOI: 10.1021/np300066q
  52. 52
    Simmler, C.; Hajirahimkhan, A.; Lankin, D. C.; Bolton, J. L.; Jones, T.; Soejarto, D. D.; Chen, S. N.; Pauli, G. F. Dynamic residual complexity of the isoliquiritigenin-liquiritigenin interconversion during bioassay J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 2146 2157 DOI: 10.1021/jf304445p
  53. 53
    Gordon, O. N.; Luis, P. B.; Sintim, H. O.; Schneider, C. Unraveling curcumin degradation: Autoxidation proceeds through spiroepoxide and vinylether intermediates en route to the main bicyclopentadione J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 4817 4828 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.618785
  54. 54
    Workman, P.; Collins, I. Probing the probes: Fitness factors for small molecule tools Chem. Biol. (Oxford, U. K.) 2010, 17, 561 577 DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.05.013
  55. 55
    Singh, J.; Petter, R. C.; Baillie, T. A.; Whitty, A. The resurgence of covalent drugs Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2011, 10, 307 317 DOI: 10.1038/nrd3410
  56. 56
    Kalgutkar, A. S.; Dalvie, D. K. Drug discovery for a new generation of covalent drugs Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2012, 7, 561 581 DOI: 10.1517/17460441.2012.688744
  57. 57
    Schröder, J.; Klinger, A.; Oellien, F.; Marhoefer, R. J.; Duszenko, M.; Selzer, P. M. Docking-based virtual screening of covalently binding ligands: An orthogonal lead discovery approach J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 1478 1490 DOI: 10.1021/jm3013932
  58. 58
    Davids, M. S.; Brown, J. R. Ibrutinib: A first in class covalent inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase Future Oncol. 2014, 10, 957 967 DOI: 10.2217/fon.14.51
  59. 59
    Flanagan, M. E.; Abramite, J. A.; Anderson, D. P.; Aulabaugh, A.; Dahal, U. P.; Gilbert, A. M.; Li, C.; Montgomery, J.; Oppenheimer, S. R.; Ryder, T.; Schuff, B. P.; Uccello, D. P.; Walker, G. S.; Wu, Y.; Brown, M. F.; Chen, J. M.; Hayward, M. M.; Noe, M. C.; Obach, R. S.; Philippe, L.; Shanmugasundaram, V.; Shapiro, M. J.; Starr, J.; Stroh, J.; Che, Y. Chemical and computational methods for the characterization of covalent reactive groups for the prospective design of irreversible inhibitors J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 10072 10079 DOI: 10.1021/jm501412a
  60. 60
    Jost, C.; Nitsche, C.; Scholz, T.; Roux, L.; Klein, C. D. Promiscuity and selectivity in covalent enzyme inhibition: A systematic study of electrophilic fragments J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 7590 7599 DOI: 10.1021/jm5006918
  61. 61
    Mah, R.; Thomas, J. R.; Shafer, C. M. Drug discovery considerations in the development of covalent inhibitors Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 33 39 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.10.003
  62. 62
    Moghaddam, M. F.; Tang, Y.; O’Brien, Z.; Richardson, S. J.; Bacolod, M.; Chaturedi, P.; Apuy, J.; Kulkarni, A. A proposed screening paradigm for discovery of covalent inhibitor drugs Drug Metab. Lett. 2014, 8, 19 30 DOI: 10.2174/1872312808666140317151735
  63. 63
    Payton, F.; Sandusky, P.; Alworth, W. L. NMR study of the solution structure of curcumin J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 143 146 DOI: 10.1021/np060263s
  64. 64
    Jagannathan, R.; Abraham, P. M.; Poddar, P. Temperature-dependent spectroscopic evidences of curcumin in aqueous medium: A mechanistic study of its solubility and stability J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 14533 14540 DOI: 10.1021/jp3050516
  65. 65
    Takagi, T.; Ramachandran, C.; Bermejo, M.; Yamashita, S.; Yu, L. X.; Amidon, G. L. A provisional biopharmaceutical classification of the top 200 oral drug products in the United States, Great Britain, Spain, and Japan Mol. Pharmaceutics 2006, 3, 631 643 DOI: 10.1021/mp0600182
  66. 66
    Griesser, M.; Pistis, V.; Suzuki, T.; Tejera, N.; Pratt, D. A.; Schneider, C. Autoxidative and cyclooxygenase-2 catalyzed transformation of the dietary chemopreventive agent curcumin J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 1114 1124 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.178806
  67. 67
    Gordon, O. N.; Schneider, C. Vanillin and ferulic acid: Not the major degradation products of curcumin Trends Mol. Med. 2012, 18, 361 363

    (author reply, pp 363–364)

     DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.04.011
  68. 68
    Khurana, A.; Ho, C. T. High-performance liquid-chromatographic analysis of curcuminoids and their photo-oxidative decomposition compounds in Curcuma longa l J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1988, 11, 2295 2304 DOI: 10.1080/01483918808067200
  69. 69
    Tønnesen, H. H.; Karlsen, J.; van Henegouwen, G. B. Studies on curcumin and curcuminoids. VIII. Photochemical stability of curcumin Z. Lebensm.-Unters. Forsch. 1986, 183, 116 122 DOI: 10.1007/BF01041928
  70. 70
    Ghosh, M.; Singh, A. T.; Xu, W.; Sulchek, T.; Gordon, L. I.; Ryan, R. O. Curcumin nanodisks: Formulation and characterization Nanomedicine 2011, 7, 162 167 DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2010.08.002
  71. 71
    Sun, M.; Su, X.; Ding, B.; He, X.; Liu, X.; Yu, A.; Lou, H.; Zhai, G. Advances in nantoechnology-based delivery systems for curcumin Nanomedicine (London, U. K.) 2012, 7, 1085 1100 DOI: 10.2217/nnm.12.80
  72. 72
    Tamvakopoulos, C.; Dimas, K.; Sofianos, Z. D.; Hatziantoniou, S.; Han, Z.; Liu, Z. L.; Wyche, J. H.; Pantazis, P. Metabolism and anticancer activity of the curcumin analogue, dimethoxycurcumin Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 1269 1277 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1839
  73. 73
    Robinson, T. P.; Hubbard, R. B. t.; Ehlers, T. J.; Arbiser, J. L.; Goldsmith, D. J.; Bowen, J. P. Synthesis and biological evaluation of aromatic enones related to curcumin Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 4007 4013 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.03.054
  74. 74
    Liang, G.; Shao, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Chu, Y.; Xiao, J.; Zhao, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, S. Exploration and synthesis of curcumin analogues with improved structural stability both in vitro and in vivo as cytotoxic agents Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 2623 2631 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.10.044
  75. 75
    Lim, T.-G.; Lee, S.-Y.; Huang, Z.; Lim, D. Y.; Chen, H.; Jung, S. K.; Bode, A. M.; Lee, K. W.; Dong, Z. Curcumin suppresses proliferation of colon cancer cells by targeting CDK2 Cancer Prev. Res. 2014, 7, 466 474 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0387
  76. 76
    Balasubramanian, K. Molecular orbital basis for yellow curry spice curcumin’s prevention of Alzheimer’s disease J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 3512 3520 DOI: 10.1021/jf0603533
  77. 77
    Ciccone, L.; Tepshi, L.; Nencetti, S.; Stura, E. A. Transthyretin complexes with curcumin and bromo-estradiol: Evaluation of solubilizing multicomponent mixtures New Biotechnol. 2015, 32, 54 64 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2014.09.002
  78. 78
    Irwin, J. J.; Duan, D.; Torosyan, H.; Doak, A. K.; Ziebart, K. T.; Sterling, T.; Tumanian, G.; Shoichet, B. K. An aggregation advisor for ligand discovery J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 7076 7087 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01105
  79. 79
    Coan, K. E.; Shoichet, B. K. Stoichiometry and physical chemistry of promiscuous aggregate-based inhibitors J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9606 9612 DOI: 10.1021/ja802977h
  80. 80
    Coan, K. E. D.; Maltby, D. A.; Burlingame, A. L.; Shoichet, B. K. Promiscuous aggregate-based inhibitors promote enzyme unfolding J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 2067 2075 DOI: 10.1021/jm801605r
  81. 81
    Winter, S.; Tortik, N.; Kubin, A.; Krammer, B.; Plaetzer, K. Back to the roots: Photodynamic inactivation of bacteria based on water-soluble curcumin bound to polyvinylpyrrolidone as a photosensitizer Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2013, 12, 1795 1802 DOI: 10.1039/c3pp50095k
  82. 82
    Siviero, A.; Gallo, E.; Maggini, V.; Gori, L.; Mugelli, A.; Firenzuoli, F.; Vannacci, A. Curcumin, a golden spice with a low bioavailability Journal of Herbal Medicine 2015, 5, 57 70 DOI: 10.1016/j.hermed.2015.03.001
  83. 83
    Lao, C. D.; Ruffin, M. T. I. V.; Normolle, D.; Heath, D. D.; Murray, S. I.; Bailey, J. M.; Boggs, M. E.; Crowell, J.; Rock, C. L.; Brenner, D. E. Dose escalation of a curcuminoid formulation BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2006, 6, 10 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-6-10
  84. 84
    Wahlang, B.; Pawar, Y. B.; Bansal, A. K. Identification of permeability-related hurdles in oral delivery of curcumin using the Caco-2 cell model Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2011, 77, 275 282 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.12.006
  85. 85
    Volpe, D. A.; Faustino, P. J.; Ciavarella, A. B.; Asafu-Adjaye, E. B.; Ellison, C. D.; Yu, L. X.; Hussain, A. S. Classification of drug permeability with a Caco-2 cell monolayer assay Clin. Res. Regul. Aff. 2007, 24, 39 47 DOI: 10.1080/10601330701273669
  86. 86
    Suresh, D.; Srinivasan, K. Tissue distribution & elimination of capsaicin, piperine & curcumin following oral intake in rats Indian J. Med. Res. 2010, 131, 682 691
  87. 87
    Ravindranath, V.; Chandrasekhara, N. Absorption and tissue distribution of curcumin in rats Toxicology 1980, 16, 259 265 DOI: 10.1016/0300-483X(80)90122-5
  88. 88
    Ravindranath, V.; Chandrasekhara, N. Metabolism of curcumin - studies with [3H]curcumin Toxicology 1982, 22, 337 344 DOI: 10.1016/0300-483X(81)90027-5
  89. 89
    Mathews, S.; Rao, M. N. A. Interaction of curcumin with glutathione Int. J. Pharm. (Amsterdam, Neth.) 1991, 76, 257 259 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5173(91)90278-V
  90. 90
    Asai, A.; Miyazawa, T. Occurrence of orally administered curcuminoid as glucuronide and glucuronide/sulfate conjugates in rat plasma Life Sci. 2000, 67, 2785 2793 DOI: 10.1016/S0024-3205(00)00868-7
  91. 91
    Sharma, R. A.; McLelland, H. R.; Hill, K. A.; Ireson, C. R.; Euden, S. A.; Manson, M. M.; Pirmohamed, M.; Marnett, L. J.; Gescher, A. J.; Steward, W. P. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic study of oral Curcuma extract in patients with colorectal cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 2001, 7, 1894 1900
  92. 92
    Garcea, G.; Berry, D. P.; Jones, D. J. L.; Singh, R.; Dennison, A. R.; Farmer, P. B.; Sharma, R. A.; Steward, W. P.; Gescher, A. J. Consumption of the putative chemopreventative agent curcumin by cancer patients: Assessment of curcumin levels in the colorectum and their pharmacodynamic consequences Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers Prev. 2005, 14, 120 125
  93. 93
    Johnson, J. J.; Mukhtar, H. Curcumin for chemoprevention of colon cancer Cancer Lett. (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 2007, 255, 170 181 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.03.005
  94. 94
    Vareed, S. K.; Kakarala, M.; Ruffin, M. T.; Crowell, J. A.; Normolle, D. P.; Djuric, Z.; Brenner, D. E. Pharmacokinetics of curcumin conjugate metabolites in healthy human subjects Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers Prev. 2008, 17, 1411 1417 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2693
  95. 95
    Chan, E.; Tan, M.; Xin, J.; Sudarsanam, S.; Johnson, D. E. Interactions between traditional Chinese medicines and western therapeutics Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2010, 13, 50 65
  96. 96
    Hong, D. H.; Son, Y. K.; Choi, I.-W.; Park, W. S. The inhibitory effect of curcumin on voltage-dependent K+ channels in rabbit coronary arterial smooth muscle cells Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 430, 307 312 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.10.132
  97. 97
    Bamba, Y.; Yun, Y. S.; Kunugi, A.; Inoue, H. Compounds isolated from Curcuma aromatica Salisb. inhibit human P450 enzymes J. Nat. Med. 2011, 65, 583 587 DOI: 10.1007/s11418-011-0507-0
  98. 98
    Gupta, S. C.; Kismali, G.; Aggarwal, B. B. Curcumin, a component of turmeric: From farm to pharmacy BioFactors 2013, 39, 2 13 DOI: 10.1002/biof.1079
  99. 99
    Schramm, A.; Jahne, E. A.; Baburin, I.; Hering, S.; Hamburger, M. Natural products as potential human ether-a-go-go-related gene channel inhibitors - outcomes from a screening of widely used herbal medicines and edible plants Planta Med. 2014, 80, 1045 1050 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1382907
  100. 100
    Xia, M.; Shahane, S. A.; Huang, R.; Titus, S. A.; Shum, E.; Zhao, Y.; Southall, N.; Zheng, W.; Witt, K. L.; Tice, R. R.; Austin, C. P. Identification of quaternary ammonium compounds as potent inhibitors of hERG potassium channels Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2011, 252, 250 258 DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.02.016
  101. 101
    Hu, C.-W.; Sheng, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, H.-B.; Xie, X.; Ma, W.-C.; Huo, R.; Dong, D.-L. Curcumin inhibits hERG potassium channels in vitro Toxicol. Lett. 2012, 208, 192 196 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.11.005
  102. 102
    Zhang, G.; Nitteranon, V.; Chan, L. Y.; Parkin, K. L. Glutathione conjugation attenuates biological activities of 6-dehydroshogaol from ginger Food Chem. 2013, 140, 1 8 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.02.073
  103. 103
    McFadden, R.-M. T.; Larmonier, C. B.; Shehab, K. W.; Midura-Kiela, M.; Ramalingam, R.; Harrison, C. A.; Besselsen, D. G.; Chase, J. H.; Caporaso, J. G.; Jobin, C.; Ghishan, F. K.; Kiela, P. R. The role of curcumin in modulating colonic microbiota during colitis and colon cancer prevention Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 2483 2494 DOI: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000522
  104. 104
    Gupta, S. C.; Prasad, S.; Kim, J. H.; Patchva, S.; Webb, L. J.; Priyadarsini, I. K.; Aggarwal, B. B. Multitargeting by curcumin as revealed by molecular interaction studies Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011, 28, 1937 1955 DOI: 10.1039/c1np00051a
  105. 105
    Ghosh, S.; Banerjee, S.; Sil, P. C. The beneficial role of curcumin on inflammation, diabetes and neurodegenerative disease: A recent update Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 83, 111 124 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.05.022
  106. 106
    Oliveira, A. S.; Sousa, E.; Vasconcelos, M. H.; Pinto, M. Curcumin: A natural lead for potential new drug candidates Curr. Med. Chem. 2015, 22, 4196 4232 DOI: 10.2174/0929867322666151029104611
  107. 107
    Kundu, P.; Mohanty, C.; Sahoo, S. K. Antiglioma activity of curcumin-loaded lipid nanoparticles and its enhanced bioavailability in brain tissue for effective glioblastoma therapy Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 2670 2687 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.048
  108. 108
    Dilnawaz, F.; Singh, A.; Sahoo, S. K. Transferrin-conjugated curcumin-loaded superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles induce augmented cellular uptake and apoptosis in K562 cells Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 704 719 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.10.022
  109. 109
    Ni, Z.; Xing, F.; Wang, P.; Cao, G. Retracted: Synthesis, characterization and release of curcumin-intercalated Mg–Al-layered double hydroxides Appl. Clay Sci. 2008, 40, 72 80 DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2007.07.008
  110. 110
    Tomita, M.; Kawakami, H.; Uchihara, J. N.; Okudaira, T.; Masuda, M.; Takasu, N.; Matsuda, T.; Ohta, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Mori, N. Curcumin suppresses constitutive activation of AP-1 by downregulation of Jund protein in HTLV-1-infected T-cell lines Leuk. Res. 2006, 30, 313 321 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.08.004
  111. 111
    Mishra, A.; Kumar, R.; Tyagi, A.; Kohaar, I.; Hedau, S.; Bharti, A. C.; Sarker, S.; Dey, D.; Saluja, D.; Das, B. Curcumin modulates cellular AP-1, NF-kB, and HPV16 E6 proteins in oral cancer ecancer 2015, 9, 525 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2015.525
  112. 112
    Tomita, M. Retraction: Curcumin targets Akt cell survival signaling pathway in HTLV-I-infected T-cell lines Cancer Sci. 2011, 102, 499 DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01831.x
  113. 113
    Balasubramanyam, K.; Varier, R. A.; Altaf, M.; Swaminathan, V.; Siddappa, N. B.; Ranga, U.; Kundu, T. K. Curcumin, a novel p300/CREB-binding protein-specific inhibitor of acetyltransferase, represses the acetylation of histone/nonhistone proteins and histone acetyltransferase-dependent chromatin transcription J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 51163 51171 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M409024200
  114. 114
    Simon, R. P.; Robaa, D.; Alhalabi, Z.; Sippl, W.; Jung, M. Katching-up on small molecule modulators of lysine acetyltransferases J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 1249 1270 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01502
  115. 115
    Lu, X.; Deng, Y.; Yu, D.; Cao, H.; Wang, L.; Liu, L.; Yu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, X.; Yu, G. Histone acetyltransferase p300 mediates histone acetylation of PS1 and BACE1 in a cellular model of Alzheimer’s disease PLoS One 2014, 9, e103067 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103067
  116. 116
    Cui, L.; Miao, J.; Cui, L. Cytotoxic effect of curcumin on malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum: Inhibition of histone acetylation and generation of reactive oxygen species Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 488 494 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01238-06
  117. 117
    Kutluay, S. B.; Doroghazi, J.; Roemer, M. E.; Triezenberg, S. J. Curcumin inhibits herpes simplex virus immediate-early gene expression by a mechanism independent of p300/CBP histone acetyltransferase activity Virology 2008, 373, 239 247 DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.11.028
  118. 118
    Kang, S.-K.; Cha, S.-H.; Jeon, H.-G. Curcumin-induced histone hypoacetylation enhances caspase-3-dependent glioma cell death and neurogenesis of neural progenitor cells Stem Cells Dev. 2006, 15, 165 174 DOI: 10.1089/scd.2006.15.165
  119. 119
    Chen, W.; Bacanamwo, M.; Harrison, D. G. Activation of p300 histone acetyltransferase activity is an early endothelial response to laminar shear stress and is essential for stimulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase mRNA transcription J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 16293 16298 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M801803200
  120. 120
    Chiu, J.; Khan, Z. A.; Farhangkhoee, H.; Chakrabarti, S. Curcumin prevents diabetes-associated abnormalities in the kidneys by inhibiting p300 and nuclear factor-kappaB Nutrition 2009, 25, 964 972 DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.12.007
  121. 121
    Collins, H. M.; Abdelghany, M. K.; Messmer, M.; Yue, B.; Deeves, S. E.; Kindle, K. B.; Mantelingu, K.; Aslam, A.; Winkler, G. S.; Kundu, T. K.; Heery, D. M. Differential effects of garcinol and curcumin on histone and p53 modifications in tumour cells BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 37 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-37
  122. 122
    Dahlin, J. L.; Nissink, J. W. M.; Strasser, J. M.; Francis, S.; Higgins, L.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Z.; Walters, M. A. PAINS in the assay: Chemical mechanisms of assay interference and promiscuous enzymatic inhibition observed during a sulfhydryl-scavenging HTS J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 2091 2113 DOI: 10.1021/jm5019093
  123. 123
    Bora-Tatar, G.; Dayangac-Erden, D.; Demir, A. S.; Dalkara, S.; Yelekci, K.; Erdem-Yurter, H. Molecular modifications on carboxylic acid derivatives as potent histone deacetylase inhibitors: Activity and docking studies Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 5219 5228 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.05.042
  124. 124
    Wang, S.-H.; Lin, P.-Y.; Chiu, Y.-C.; Huang, J.-S.; Kuo, Y.-T.; Wu, J.-C.; Chen, C.-C. Curcumin-mediated HDAC inhibition suppresses the DNA damage response and contributes to increased DNA damage sensitivity PLoS One 2015, 10, e0134110/0134111 e0134110/0134119 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134110
  125. 125
    Link, A.; Balaguer, F.; Goel, A. Cancer chemoprevention by dietary polyphenols: Promising role for epigenetics Biochem. Pharmacol. (Amsterdam, Neth.) 2010, 80, 1771 1792 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.06.036
  126. 126
    Rajendran, P.; Ho, E.; Williams, D. E.; Dashwood, R. H. Dietary phytochemicals, HDAC inhibition, and DNA damage/repair defects in cancer cells Clin. Epigenet. 2011, 3, 4 DOI: 10.1186/1868-7083-3-4
  127. 127
    Bustanji, Y.; Taha, M. O.; Almasri, I. M.; Al-Ghussein, M. A. S.; Mohammad, M. K.; Alkhatib, H. S. Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase by curcumin: Investigation by simulated molecular docking and subsequent in vitro/in vivo evaluation J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2009, 24, 771 778 DOI: 10.1080/14756360802364377
  128. 128
    Di Martino, R. M.; De Simone, A.; Andrisano, V.; Bisignano, P.; Bisi, A.; Gobbi, S.; Rampa, A.; Fato, R.; Bergamini, C.; Perez, D. I.; Martinez, A.; Bottegoni, G.; Cavalli, A.; Belluti, F. Versatility of the curcumin scaffold: Discovery of potent and balanced dual BACE-1 and GSK-3beta inhibitors J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 531 544 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00894
  129. 129
    Zhang, X.; Yin, W. K.; Shi, X. D.; Li, Y. Curcumin activates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway through inhibiting the activity of GSK-3beta in APPswe transfected SY5Y cells Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 42, 540 546 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.02.009
  130. 130
    Yun, J. H.; Park, Y. G.; Lee, K. M.; Kim, J.; Nho, C. W. Curcumin induces apoptotic cell death via Oct4 inhibition and GSK-3beta activation in NCCIT cells Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 1053 1062 DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201400739
  131. 131
    Xiong, Z.; Hongmei, Z.; Lu, S.; Yu, L. Curcumin mediates presenilin-1 activity to reduce β-amyloid production in a model of Alzheimer’s disease Pharmacol. Rep. 2011, 63, 1101 1108 DOI: 10.1016/S1734-1140(11)70629-6
  132. 132
    Dahlin, J. L.; Inglese, J.; Walters, M. A. Mitigating risk in academic preclinical drug discovery Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2015, 14, 279 294 DOI: 10.1038/nrd4578
  133. 133
    Yang, F.; Lim, G. P.; Begum, A. N.; Ubeda, O. J.; Simmons, M. R.; Ambegaokar, S. S.; Chen, P. P.; Kayed, R.; Glabe, C. G.; Frautschy, S. A.; Cole, G. M. Curcumin inhibits formation of amyloid beta oligomers and fibrils, binds plaques, and reduces amyloid in vivo J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 5892 5901 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M404751200
  134. 134
    Hudson, S. A.; Ecroyd, H.; Kee, T. W.; Carver, J. A. The thioflavin T fluorescence assay for amyloid fibril detection can be biased by the presence of exogenous compounds FEBS J. 2009, 276, 5960 5972 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07307.x
  135. 135
    Thapa, A.; Jett, S. D.; Chi, E. Y. Curcumin attenuates amyloid-β aggregate toxicity and modulates amyloid-β aggregation pathway ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2016, 7, 56 68 DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00214
  136. 136
    Kayed, R.; Head, E.; Thompson, J. L.; McIntire, T. M.; Milton, S. C.; Cotman, C. W.; Glabe, C. G. Common structure of soluble amyloid oligomers implies common mechanism of pathogenesis Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 2003, 300, 486 489 DOI: 10.1126/science.1079469
  137. 137
    Feng, B. Y.; Shoichet, B. K. A detergent-based assay for the detection of promiscuous inhibitors Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 550 553 DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2006.77
  138. 138
    Egan, M. E.; Pearson, M.; Weiner, S. A.; Rajendran, V.; Rubin, D.; Gloeckner-Pagel, J.; Canny, S.; Du, K.; Lukacs, G. L.; Caplan, M. J. Curcumin, a major constituent of turmeric, corrects cystic fibrosis defects Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 2004, 304, 600 602 DOI: 10.1126/science.1093941
  139. 139
    Song, Y.; Sonawane, N. D.; Salinas, D.; Qian, L.; Pedemonte, N.; Galietta, L. J. V.; Verkman, A. S. Evidence against the rescue of defective ΔF508-CFTR cellular processing by curcumin in cell culture and mouse models J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 40629 40633 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M407308200
  140. 140
    Dey, I.; Shah, K.; Bradbury, N. A. Natural compounds as therapeutic agents in the treatment cystic fibrosis J. Genet. Syndr. Gene Ther. 2016, 7, 284 DOI: 10.4172/2157-7412.1000284
  141. 141
    Seely, K. A.; Levi, M. S.; Prather, P. L. The dietary polyphenols trans-resveratrol and curcumin selectively bind human CB1 cannabinoid receptors with nanomolar affinities and function as antagonists/inverse agonists J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009, 330, 31 39 DOI: 10.1124/jpet.109.151654
  142. 142
    Prather, P. L.; Seely, K. A.; Levi, M. S. Notice of retraction J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009, 331, 1147
  143. 143
    Sharma, C.; Sadek, B.; Goyal, S. N.; Sinha, S.; Kamal, M. A.; Ojha, S. Small molecules from nature targeting G-protein coupled cannabinoid receptors: Potential leads for drug discovery and development Evidence-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 238482 DOI: 10.1155/2015/238482
  144. 144
    Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Part 182: Substances Generally Recognized as Safe. Section 182.20 Essential oils, oleoresins (solvent-free), and natural extractives (including distillates). U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2016.
  145. 145
    Ringman, J. M.; Bardens, J.; Apostolova, L. G.; Frautschy, S. A.; Teng, E.; Cole, G. M.; Begum, A. N.; Beigi, M.; Gylys, K. H.; Badmaev, V.; Heath, D. D.; Porter, V.; Vanek, Z.; Marshall, G. A.; Hellemann, G.; Sugar, C.; Masterman, D. L.; Montine, T. J.; Cummings, J. L. Oral curcumin for Alzheimer’s disease: Tolerability and efficacy in a 24-week randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study Alzheimer's Res. Ther. 2012, 4, 43 DOI: 10.1186/alzrt146
  146. 146
    Pfizer. Bioequivalence study comparing a new 10 mg atorvastatin tablet to a 10 mg atorvastatin commercial tablet. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00917579, 2009
  147. 147
    Sharma, R. A.; Euden, S. A.; Platton, S. L.; Cooke, D. N.; Shafayat, A.; Hewitt, H. R.; Marczylo, T. H.; Morgan, B.; Hemingway, D.; Plummer, S. M.; Pirmohamed, M.; Gescher, A. J.; Steward, W. P. Phase I clinical trial of oral curcumin: Biomarkers of systemic activity and compliance Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 6847 6854 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0744
  148. 148
    Dhillon, N.; Aggarwal, B. B.; Newman, R. A.; Wolff, R. A.; Kunnumakkara, A. B.; Abbruzzese, J. L.; Ng, C. S.; Badmaev, V.; Kurzrock, R. Phase II trial of curcumin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 4491 4499 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0024
  149. 149
    Asher, G. N.; Spelman, K. Clinical utility of curcumin extract Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2013, 19, 20 22
  150. 150
    Gupta, S. C.; Patchva, S.; Aggarwal, B. B. Therapeutic roles of curcumin: Lessons learned from clinical trials AAPS J. 2013, 15, 195 218 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-012-9432-8
  151. 151
    Hsu, C.-H.; Cheng, A.-L. Clinical studies with curcumin Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2007, 595, 471 480 DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-46401-5_21
  152. 152
    Oppenheimer, A. Turmeric (curcumin) in biliary diseases Lancet 1937, 229, 619 621 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)98193-5
  153. 153
    National Institutes of Health. "ClinicalTrials.gov." Registry and results database of clinical studies of human participants. http://clinicaltrials.gov (accessed October 6, 2016) .
  154. 154
    Hurlstone, D. P.; Karajeh, M.; Sanders, D. S.; Drew, S. K.; Cross, S. S. Rectal aberrant crypt foci identified using high-magnification-chromoscopic colonoscopy: Biomarkers for flat and depressed neoplasia Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2005, 100, 1283 1289 DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40891.x
  155. 155
    Mattson, M. P.; Cheng, A. Neurohormetic phytochemicals: Low-dose toxins that induce adaptive neuronal stress responses Trends Neurosci. 2006, 29, 632 639 DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2006.09.001
  156. 156
    Brondino, N.; Re, S.; Boldrini, A.; Cuccomarino, A.; Lanati, N.; Barale, F.; Politi, P. Curcumin as a therapeutic agent in dementia: A mini systematic review of human studies Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 174282 DOI: 10.1155/2014/174282
  157. 157
    Chandra, V.; Pandav, R.; Dodge, H. H.; Johnston, J. M.; Belle, S. H.; DeKosky, S. T.; Ganguli, M. Incidence of Alzheimer’s disease in a rural community in India: The Indo-US study Neurology 2001, 57, 985 989 DOI: 10.1212/WNL.57.6.985
  158. 158
    Ng, T.-P.; Chiam, P.-C.; Lee, T.; Chua, H.-C.; Lim, L.; Kua, E.-H. Curry consumption and cognitive function in the elderly Am. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 164, 898 906 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj267
  159. 159
    Li, S.; Yuan, W.; Deng, G.; Wang, P.; Yang, P.; Aggarwal, B. B. Chemical composition and product quality control of turmeric (Curcuma longa l.) Pharm. Crops 2011, 2, 28 54 DOI: 10.2174/2210290601102010028
  160. 160
    Clark, C. M.; Sheppard, L.; Fillinbaum, G. G.; Galasko, D.; Morris, J. C.; Koss, E.; Mohs, R.; Heyman, A. Variability in annual mini-mental state examination score in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease Arch. Neurol. (Chicago) 1999, 56, 857 862 DOI: 10.1001/archneur.56.7.857
  161. 161
    Dahlin, J. L.; Walters, M. A. The essential roles of chemistry in high-throughput screening triage Future Med. Chem. 2014, 6, 1265 1290 DOI: 10.4155/fmc.14.60
  162. 162
    Atanasov, A. G.; Waltenberger, B.; Pferschy-Wenzig, E. M.; Linder, T.; Wawrosch, C.; Uhrin, P.; Temml, V.; Wang, L.; Schwaiger, S.; Heiss, E. H.; Rollinger, J. M.; Schuster, D.; Breuss, J. M.; Bochkov, V.; Mihovilovic, M. D.; Kopp, B.; Bauer, R.; Dirsch, V. M.; Stuppner, H. Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: A review Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1582 1614 DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.08.001
  163. 163
    Wagner, H. Synergy research: Approaching a new generation of phytopharmaceuticals Fitoterapia 2011, 82, 34 37 DOI: 10.1016/j.fitote.2010.11.016
  164. 164
    Gertsch, J. The metabolic plant feedback hypothesis: How plant secondary metabolites nonspecifically impact human health Planta Med. 2016, 82, 920 929 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-108340

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 1241 publications.

  1. Mohammad Abdul Sattar. Curcuma Longa-Based Green and Sustainable Antioxidants for Biopolymers. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2024, Article ASAP.
  2. Jamie Gudyka, Jasmin Ceja-Vega, Katherine Ivanchenko, Zachary Morocho, Micaela Panella, Alondra Gamez Hernandez, Colleen Clarke, Escarlin Perez, Shakinah Silverberg, Sunghee Lee. Concentration-Dependent Effects of Curcumin on Membrane Permeability and Structure. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science 2024, Article ASAP.
  3. Toshiyuki Murai, Yoshikazu Masaki, Kazuma Yasuhara. Curcumin Modulates the Membrane Raft Integrity via Phase Separation and Induces CD44 Shedding in Tumor Cells. Biochemistry 2024, 63 (4) , 441-451. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.3c00645
  4. Alberto Boretti. Curcumin-Based Fixed Dose Combination Products for Cholesterol Management: A Narrative Review. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science 2024, 7 (2) , 300-308. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.3c00234
  5. Piyali Chatterjee, Subhra Sankar Dutta, Megha Agarwal, Supriyo Dey, Tapas Chakraborty. UV-A-Induced Photoisomerization and Photodimerization of Curcumin: An Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2024, 128 (3) , 548-562. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c05933
  6. Linh Pham, Rui Jiang, Zijing Liu, Mai Nguyen, Yen Nguyen, Yue Gong, Yanran Bi, Hong-Rae Kim, Young Ran Kim, Gyudong Kim. Synthesis of 9-Cinnamyl-9H-purine Derivatives as Novel TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB Pathway Inhibitors for Anti-inflammatory Effects. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2023, 14 (12) , 1839-1847. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.3c00437
  7. Boris Cvek. The Promiscuity of Disulfiram in Medicinal Research. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2023, 14 (12) , 1610-1614. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.3c00450
  8. Rezwan Siddiquee, Victor Lo, Caitlin L. Johnston, Aston W. Buffier, Sarah R. Ball, Jonathan L. Ciofani, Yi Cheng Zeng, Mahiar Mahjoub, Wojciech Chrzanowski, Shahrzad Rezvani-Baboli, Louise Brown, Chi L. L. Pham, Margaret Sunde, Ann H. Kwan. Surface-Induced Hydrophobin Assemblies with Versatile Properties and Distinct Underlying Structures. Biomacromolecules 2023, 24 (11) , 4783-4797. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.3c00542
  9. Ali Samie, Hoda Alavian, Zeinab Vafaei-Pour, Amir Hooshang Mohammadpour, Amir Hossein Jafarian, Noor Mohammad Danesh, Khalil Abnous, Seyed Mohammad Taghdisi. Accelerated Wound Healing with a Diminutive Scar through Cocrystal Engineered Curcumin. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2023, 20 (10) , 5090-5107. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00398
  10. James B. McAlpine, Daneel Ferreira, Neil E. Pauli, Stefan Gafner, Guido F. Pauli. The Ethics of Publishing Biomedical and Natural Products Research. Journal of Natural Products 2023, 86 (9) , 2228-2237. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.3c00165
  11. Chen Hang, Zhou Wei, Xiang Jieyu, Li Man, Yiru Ye, Zhou Ling, Wang Min, Chen Danyang, Guo Liang. ZIF-8/Curcumin-Loaded Electrospun Nanofiber Membrane for Wound Healing. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2023, 6 (17) , 15620-15631. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c02443
  12. Xinyi Wu, Haritha Krishna Sudhakar, Lisa J. Alcock, Yu Heng Lau. Mannich Base PIP-199 Is a Chemically Unstable Pan-Assay Interference Compound. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (16) , 11271-11281. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00674
  13. Nur Aininie Yusoh, Paul R. Tiley, Steffan D. James, Siti Norain Harun, Jim A. Thomas, Norazalina Saad, Ling-Wei Hii, Suet Lin Chia, Martin R. Gill, Haslina Ahmad. Discovery of Ruthenium(II) Metallocompound and Olaparib Synergy for Cancer Combination Therapy. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (10) , 6922-6937. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00322
  14. Xiangyu Chen, Qian Ren, Guangcan Chen, Zeng Yi, Qiulan Tong, Yaqin Ran, Lei Ma, Ping Fu, Liang Ma, Xudong Li. Self-Assembled Phytochemical Nanomedicines with Enhanced Bioactivities for Effective Acute Kidney Injury Therapy. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2023, 11 (19) , 7288-7300. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05786
  15. Ajaikumar B. Kunnumakkara, Mangala Hegde, Dey Parama, Sosmitha Girisa, Aviral Kumar, Uzini Devi Daimary, Prachi Garodia, Sarat Chandra Yenisetti, Oommen V. Oommen, Bharat B. Aggarwal. Role of Turmeric and Curcumin in Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Diseases: Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science 2023, 6 (4) , 447-518. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.2c00012
  16. Mattias F. Lindberg, Emmanuel Deau, Jonas Arfwedson, Nicolas George, Pascal George, Patricia Alfonso, Ana Corrionero, Laurent Meijer. Comparative Efficacy and Selectivity of Pharmacological Inhibitors of DYRK and CLK Protein Kinases. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2023, 66 (6) , 4106-4130. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c02068
  17. Subhrajit Mohanty, Binita Tirkey, Soumya Ranjan Jena, Luna Samanta, Usharani Subuddhi. Exploring Steroidal Surfactants as Potential Drug Carriers for an Anticancer Drug Curcumin: An Insight into the Effect of Surfactants’ Structure on the Photophysical Properties, Stability, and Activity of Curcumin. Langmuir 2023, 39 (5) , 1852-1869. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c02797
  18. Die Yang, Shilong Yang, Mingze Mu, Xueping Liu, Lei Zhao, Zhilang Xu, Changdao Mu, Defu Li, Liming Ge. Multifunctional β-Cyclodextrin–Poly(ethylene glycol)–Cholesterol Nanomicelle for Anticancer Drug Delivery. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2022, 5 (11) , 5418-5431. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.2c00773
  19. Danushika. C. Manatunga, J. Asanka Bandara Jayasinghe, Chanaka Sandaruwan, Rohini M. De Silva, K. M. Nalin De Silva. Enhancement of Release and Solubility of Curcumin from Electrospun PEO–EC–PVP Tripolymer-Based Nanofibers: A Study on the Effect of Hydrogenated Castor Oil. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (42) , 37264-37278. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03495
  20. Hasriadi, Peththa Wadu Dasuni Wasana, Piyapan Suwattananuruk, Somphob Thompho, Worathat Thitikornpong, Opa Vajragupta, Pornchai Rojsitthisak, Pasarapa Towiwat. Curcumin Diethyl γ-Aminobutyrate, a Prodrug of Curcumin, for Enhanced Treatment of Inflammatory Pain. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science 2022, 5 (9) , 774-790. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.2c00062
  21. Mahsa Bagheri, Cornelus F. van Nostrum, Robbert Jan Kok, Gert Storm, Wim E. Hennink, Michal Heger. Utility of Intravenous Curcumin Nanodelivery Systems for Improving In Vivo Pharmacokinetics and Anticancer Pharmacodynamics. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2022, 19 (9) , 3057-3074. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00455
  22. Annalaura Brai, Claudia Immacolata Trivisani, Federica Poggialini, Claudia Pasqualini, Chiara Vagaggini, Elena Dreassi. DEAD-Box Helicase DDX3X as a Host Target against Emerging Viruses: New Insights for Medicinal Chemical Approaches. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (15) , 10195-10216. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00755
  23. Attilio Marino, Matteo Battaglini, Nadia Moles, Gianni Ciofani. Natural Antioxidant Compounds as Potential Pharmaceutical Tools against Neurodegenerative Diseases. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (30) , 25974-25990. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03291
  24. Roland Böttger, Po-Han Chao, Nojoud AL Fayez, Griffin Pauli, Anne Nguyen, Lukas Hohenwarter, Nida Bilal, Gubran Khalil Mohammed, Daniel Knappe, Ralf Hoffmann, Shyh-Dar Li. Simultaneous Chromatographic Quantitation of Drug Substance and Excipients in Nanoformulations Using a Combination of Evaporative Light Scattering and Absorbance Detectors. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2022, 19 (6) , 1882-1891. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00021
  25. Piyali Chatterjee, Subhra Sankar Dutta, Tapas Chakraborty. Tautomers and Rotamers of Curcumin: A Combined UV Spectroscopy, High-Performance Liquid Chromatography, Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry, and Electronic Structure Theory Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2022, 126 (10) , 1591-1604. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.1c08612
  26. Yan Tian, Dongmei Jia, Mahmut Dirican, Meng Cui, Dongjun Fang, Chaoyi Yan, Jingyi Xie, Yi Liu, Chunxing Li, Junjun Fu, Hao Liu, Gang Chen, Xiangwu Zhang, Jinsong Tao. Highly Soluble and Stable, High Release Rate Nanocellulose Codrug Delivery System of Curcumin and AuNPs for Dual Chemo-Photothermal Therapy. Biomacromolecules 2022, 23 (3) , 960-971. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01367
  27. Valeria A. Stepanova, Andres Guerrero, Cullen Schull, Joshua Christensen, Claire Trudeau, Joshua Cook, Kyle Wolmutt, Jordan Blochwitz, Abdelrahman Ismail, Joseph K. West, Amelia M. Wheaton, Ilia A. Guzei, Bin Yao, Alena Kubatova. Hybrid Synthetic and Computational Study of an Optimized, Solvent-Free Approach to Curcuminoids. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (8) , 7257-7277. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c07006
  28. Aarti Upadhyay, Paramita Kundu, Vanitha Ramu, Paturu Kondaiah, Akhil R. Chakravarty. BODIPY-Tagged Platinum(II) Curcumin Complexes for Endoplasmic Reticulum-Targeted Red Light PDT. Inorganic Chemistry 2022, 61 (3) , 1335-1348. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c02745
  29. Chun-Hung Chou, Hao-Kuang Wang, Ying-Chao Lin, Dai-Hua Tsai, Meng-Tien Lu, Chi-Tang Ho, You-Cheng Hseu, Hsin-Ling Yang, Tzong-Der Way. Bisdemethoxycurcumin Promotes Apoptosis and Inhibits the Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition through the Inhibition of the G-Protein-Coupled Receptor 161/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Signaling Pathway in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2021, 69 (48) , 14557-14567. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c05585
  30. Akanksha Dohare, Swathi Sudhakar, Björn Brodbeck, Ashutosh Mukherjee, Marc Brecht, Andreas Kandelbauer, Erik Schäffer, Hermann A. Mayer. Anisotropic and Amphiphilic Mesoporous Core–Shell Silica Microparticles Provide Chemically Selective Environments for Simultaneous Delivery of Curcumin and Quercetin. Langmuir 2021, 37 (45) , 13460-13470. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02210
  31. Zihnil A. I. Mazrad, Baptiste Schelle, Joseph A. Nicolazzo, Meike N. Leiske, Kristian Kempe. Nitrile-Functionalized Poly(2-oxazoline)s as a Versatile Platform for the Development of Polymer Therapeutics. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22 (11) , 4618-4632. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00923
  32. Ronald Hong Xiang Teo, Jeannie Xue Ting Lee, Wei Ren Tan, Wen Qian Shum, Yongxin Li, Sumod A. Pullarkat, Nguan Soon Tan, Pak-Hing Leung. Catalytic Asymmetric Hydrophosphination as a Valuable Tool to Access Dihydrophosphinated Curcumin and Its Derivatives. Organometallics 2021, 40 (20) , 3454-3461. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00466
  33. Ji Hyeon Kim, Peter Verwilst, Miae Won, Junhyoung Lee, Jonathan L. Sessler, Jiyou Han, Jong Seung Kim. A Small Molecule Strategy for Targeting Cancer Stem Cells in Hypoxic Microenvironments and Preventing Tumorigenesis. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (35) , 14115-14124. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c03875
  34. Lalita Subedi, Bhakta Prasad Gaire. Neuroprotective Effects of Curcumin in Cerebral Ischemia: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 2021, 12 (14) , 2562-2572. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00153
  35. Seon Beom Kim, Jonathan Bisson, J. Brent Friesen, Luca Bucchini, Stefan Gafner, David C. Lankin, Shao-Nong Chen, Guido F. Pauli, James B. McAlpine. The Untargeted Capability of NMR Helps Recognizing Nefarious Adulteration in Natural Products. Journal of Natural Products 2021, 84 (3) , 846-856. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c01196
  36. Jiejian Kou, Minghui Wang, Junzhuo Shi, Haiyu Zhang, Xiaohui Pu, Shiyong Song, Cuiling Yang, Yi Yan, Yvonne Döring, Xinmei Xie, Xiaobin Pang. Curcumin Reduces Cognitive Deficits by Inhibiting Neuroinflammation through the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Pathway in Apolipoprotein E4 Transgenic Mice. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (10) , 6654-6662. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04810
  37. V. H. Giang Phan, Huu Thuy Trang Duong, Phu-Tri Tran, Thavasyappan Thambi, Duy-Khiet Ho, Xabier Murgia. Self-Assembled Amphiphilic Starch Based Drug Delivery Platform: Synthesis, Preparation, and Interactions with Biological Barriers. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22 (2) , 572-585. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c01430
  38. Qiu-Hong Zhu, Guo-Hao Zhang, Ling He, Song Qin, Jia-He Tian, Lijian Ma, Guo-Hong Tao. Enhanced Solubility and Antitumor Activity of Curcumin via Breaking and Rebuilding of the Hydrogen Bond. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2021, 4 (1) , 918-927. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c01398
  39. Tina Naghdi, Shadab Faham, Tohid Mahmoudi, Nahid Pourreza, Raouf Ghavami, Hamed Golmohammadi. Phytochemicals toward Green (Bio)sensing. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 (12) , 3770-3805. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c02101
  40. Kathryn M. Nelson, Jonathan Bisson, Gurpreet Singh, James G. Graham, Shao-Nong Chen, J. Brent Friesen, Jayme L. Dahlin, Matthias Niemitz, Michael A. Walters, Guido F. Pauli. The Essential Medicinal Chemistry of Cannabidiol (CBD). Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (21) , 12137-12155. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00724
  41. Yizhe Dai, Victor Terskikh, Andreas Brinmkmann, Gang Wu. Solid-State 1H, 13C, and 17O NMR Characterization of the Two Uncommon Polymorphs of Curcumin. Crystal Growth & Design 2020, 20 (11) , 7484-7491. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.0c01164
  42. Jakob C. Green, Yuqi Jiang, Liu He, Yiming Xu, Dong Sun, Timothy Keoprasert, Christopher Nelson, Unsong Oh, Edward J. Lesnefsky, Glen E. Kellogg, Qun Chen, Shijun Zhang. Characterization and Discovery of a Selective Small-Molecule Modulator of Mitochondrial Complex I Targeting a Unique Binding Site. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (20) , 11819-11830. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01021
  43. Saed Abbasi, Yusuke Sato, Kazuaki Kajimoto, Hideyoshi Harashima. New Design Strategies for Controlling the Rate of Hydrophobic Drug Release from Nanoemulsions in Blood Circulation. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2020, 17 (10) , 3773-3782. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00542
  44. Rita Maria Concetta Di Martino, Letizia Pruccoli, Alessandra Bisi, Silvia Gobbi, Angela Rampa, Ana Martinez, Concepción Pérez, Loreto Martinez-Gonzalez, Maria Paglione, Elia Di Schiavi, Francesca Seghetti, Andrea Tarozzi, Federica Belluti. Novel Curcumin-Diethyl Fumarate Hybrid as a Dualistic GSK-3β Inhibitor/Nrf2 Inducer for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 2020, 11 (17) , 2728-2740. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00363
  45. Zolaikha Rasouli, Raouf Ghavami. Facile Approach to Fabricate a Chemical Sensor Array Based on Nanocurcumin–Metal Ions Aggregates: Detection and Identification of DNA Nucleobases. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (31) , 19331-19341. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c00593
  46. Wenjie Liu, Xiaochun Hu, Lulu Zhou, Ying Tu, Shuo Shi, Tianming Yao. Orientation-Inspired Perspective on Molecular Inhibitor of Tau Aggregation by Curcumin Conjugated with Ruthenium(II) Complex Scaffold. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2020, 124 (12) , 2343-2353. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b11705
  47. Lucie Peterková, Eva Kmoníčková, Tomáš Ruml, Silvie Rimpelová. Sarco/Endoplasmic Reticulum Calcium ATPase Inhibitors: Beyond Anticancer Perspective. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (5) , 1937-1963. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01509
  48. Kathryn M. Nelson. A Curiously Linear Path to Academic Drug Discovery. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2020, 11 (3) , 217-220. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00459
  49. Kemal Duric, Yang Liu, Shao-Nong Chen, David C. Lankin, Dejan Nikolic, James B. McAlpine, J. Brent Friesen, Guido F. Pauli. Studying Mass Balance and the Stability of (Z)-Ligustilide from Angelica sinensis Helps to Bridge a Botanical Instability–Bioactivity Chasm. Journal of Natural Products 2019, 82 (9) , 2400-2408. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.8b00962
  50. Eliška Procházková, Cheng Cao, Aditya Rawal, Martin Dračínský, Saroj Bhattacharyya, Ivana Císařová, James M. Hook, Martina H. Stenzel. Polymorphic Transformation of Drugs Induced by Glycopolymeric Vesicles Designed for Anticancer Therapy Probed by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (31) , 28278-28288. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b05514
  51. Katarina Kores, Samo Lešnik, Urban Bren, Dušanka Janežič, Janez Konc. Discovery of Novel Potential Human Targets of Resveratrol by Inverse Molecular Docking. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2019, 59 (5) , 2467-2478. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00981
  52. Naboneeta Sarkar, Susmita Bose. Liposome-Encapsulated Curcumin-Loaded 3D Printed Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (19) , 17184-17192. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b01218
  53. J. Brent Friesen, Yang Liu, Shao-Nong Chen, James B. McAlpine, Guido F. Pauli. Selective Depletion and Enrichment of Constituents in “Curcumin” and Other Curcuma longa Preparations. Journal of Natural Products 2019, 82 (3) , 621-630. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b00020
  54. Federica Bisceglia, Francesca Seghetti, Massimo Serra, Morena Zusso, Silvia Gervasoni, Laura Verga, Giulio Vistoli, Cristina Lanni, Michele Catanzaro, Ersilia De Lorenzi, Federica Belluti. Prenylated Curcumin Analogues as Multipotent Tools To Tackle Alzheimer’s Disease. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 2019, 10 (3) , 1420-1433. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00463
  55. Erik Gilberg, Jürgen Bajorath. Recent Progress in Structure-Based Evaluation of Compound Promiscuity. ACS Omega 2019, 4 (2) , 2758-2765. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03639
  56. Swarit Jasial, Erik Gilberg, Thomas Blaschke, Jürgen Bajorath. Machine Learning Distinguishes with High Accuracy between Pan-Assay Interference Compounds That Are Promiscuous or Represent Dark Chemical Matter. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (22) , 10255-10264. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01404
  57. Rajpreet Kaur, Poonam Khullar, Aabroo Mahal, Anita Gupta, Narpinder Singh, Gurinder Kaur Ahluwalia, Mandeep Singh Bakshi. Keto–Enol Tautomerism of Temperature and pH Sensitive Hydrated Curcumin Nanoparticles: Their Role as Nanoreactors and Compatibility with Blood Cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2018, 66 (45) , 11974-11980. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03893
  58. Wei Hu, Xu-Sheng Huang, Ji-Feng Wu, Liang Yang, Yong-Tang Zheng, Yue-Mao Shen, Zhi-Yu Li, Xun Li. Discovery of Novel Topoisomerase II Inhibitors by Medicinal Chemistry Approaches. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (20) , 8947-8980. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01202
  59. Jakub Stefaniak, Andrew M. Lewis, Daniel Conole, Sébastien R. G. Galan, Carole J. R. Bataille, Graham M. Wynne, M. Paola Castaldi, Thomas Lundbäck, Angela J. Russell, Kilian V. M. Huber. Chemical Instability and Promiscuity of Arylmethylidenepyrazolinone-Based MDMX Inhibitors. ACS Chemical Biology 2018, 13 (10) , 2849-2854. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.8b00665
  60. Ruyao Chen, Jeremy E. Wulff, Matthew G. Moffitt. Microfluidic Processing Approach to Controlling Drug Delivery Properties of Curcumin-Loaded Block Copolymer Nanoparticles. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2018, 15 (10) , 4517-4528. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00529
  61. Wen Cao, Faheem Muhammad, Yuan Cheng, Min Zhou, Qian Wang, Zhangping Lou, Zhe Li, Hui Wei. Acid Susceptible Ultrathin Mesoporous Silica Coated on Layered Double Hydroxide Nanoplates for pH Responsive Cancer Therapy. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2018, 1 (3) , 928-935. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.8b00343
  62. Palash Sanphui, Geetha Bolla. Curcumin, a Biological Wonder Molecule: A Crystal Engineering Point of View. Crystal Growth & Design 2018, 18 (9) , 5690-5711. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.8b00646
  63. Si Nga Wong, Shenye Hu, Wai Wing Ng, Xiaoyan Xu, Ka Lun Lai, Wai Yip Thomas Lee, Albert Hee Lum Chow, Changquan Calvin Sun, Shing Fung Chow. Cocrystallization of Curcumin with Benzenediols and Benzenetriols via Rapid Solvent Removal. Crystal Growth & Design 2018, 18 (9) , 5534-5546. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.8b00849
  64. Maria A. Matlinska, Roderick E. Wasylishen, Guy M. Bernard, Victor V. Terskikh, Andreas Brinkmann, Vladimir K. Michaelis. Capturing Elusive Polymorphs of Curcumin: A Structural Characterization and Computational Study. Crystal Growth & Design 2018, 18 (9) , 5556-5563. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.8b00859
  65. Matthew K. Matlock, Tyler B. Hughes, Jayme L. Dahlin, S. Joshua Swamidass. Modeling Small-Molecule Reactivity Identifies Promiscuous Bioactive Compounds. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2018, 58 (8) , 1483-1500. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00104
  66. Abhijit Nag, Papri Chakraborty, Ganapati Natarajan, Ananya Baksi, Sathish Kumar Mudedla, Venkatesan Subramanian, Thalappil Pradeep. Bent Keto Form of Curcumin, Preferential Stabilization of Enol by Piperine, and Isomers of Curcumin∩Cyclodextrin Complexes: Insights from Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 2018, 90 (15) , 8776-8784. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05231
  67. Shubhashis Datta, Annamária Jutková, Petra Šrámková, Lenka Lenkavská, Veronika Huntošová, Dušan Chorvát, Pavol Miškovský, Daniel Jancura, Juraj Kronek. Unravelling the Excellent Chemical Stability and Bioavailability of Solvent Responsive Curcumin-Loaded 2-Ethyl-2-oxazoline-grad-2-(4-dodecyloxyphenyl)-2-oxazoline Copolymer Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19 (7) , 2459-2471. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00057
  68. Jianping He, Jianzhuang Chen, Shaoliang Lin, Dechao Niu, Jina Hao, Xiaobo Jia, Nan Li, Jinlou Gu, Yongsheng Li, Jianlin Shi. Synthesis of a Pillar[5]arene-Based Polyrotaxane for Enhancing the Drug Loading Capacity of PCL-Based Supramolecular Amphiphile as an Excellent Drug Delivery Platform. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19 (7) , 2923-2930. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00488
  69. Aaron D. Lammer, Grégory Thiabaud, James T. Brewster II, Julie Alaniz, Jon A. Bender, Jonathan L. Sessler. Lanthanide Texaphyrins as Photocatalysts. Inorganic Chemistry 2018, 57 (6) , 3458-3464. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00248
  70. Federica Prati, Giovanni Bottegoni, Maria Laura Bolognesi, and Andrea Cavalli . BACE-1 Inhibitors: From Recent Single-Target Molecules to Multitarget Compounds for Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (3) , 619-637. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00393
  71. Liu He, Yuqi Jiang, Kai Liu, Victoria Gomez-Murcia, Xiaopin Ma, Alejandro Torrecillas, Qun Chen, Xiongwei Zhu, Edward Lesnefsky, Juan C. Gomez-Fernandez, Bin Xu, and Shijun Zhang . Insights into the Impact of a Membrane-Anchoring Moiety on the Biological Activities of Bivalent Compounds As Potential Neuroprotectants for Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (3) , 777-790. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01284
  72. Erik Gilberg, Michael Gütschow, and Jürgen Bajorath . X-ray Structures of Target–Ligand Complexes Containing Compounds with Assay Interference Potential. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (3) , 1276-1284. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01780
  73. Takanori Tsuda . Curcumin: An Effective or Deceptive Dietary Factor? Challenges for Functional Food Scientists. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2018, 66 (5) , 1059-1060. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05878
  74. John J. Irwin, Garrett Gaskins, Teague Sterling, Michael M. Mysinger, and Michael J. Keiser . Predicted Biological Activity of Purchasable Chemical Space. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2018, 58 (1) , 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00316
  75. Peter W. Kenny . Comment on The Ecstasy and Agony of Assay Interference Compounds. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2017, 57 (11) , 2640-2645. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00313
  76. Ian Diner, Jeromy Dooyema, Marla Gearing, Lary C. Walker, and Nicholas T. Seyfried . Generation of Clickable Pittsburgh Compound B for the Detection and Capture of β-Amyloid in Alzheimer’s Disease Brain. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2017, 28 (10) , 2627-2637. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00500
  77. Utso Bhattacharyya, Brijesh Kumar, Aditya Garai, Arnab Bhattacharyya, Arun Kumar, Samya Banerjee, Paturu Kondaiah, and Akhil R. Chakravarty . Curcumin “Drug” Stabilized in Oxidovanadium(IV)-BODIPY Conjugates for Mitochondria-Targeted Photocytotoxicity. Inorganic Chemistry 2017, 56 (20) , 12457-12468. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01924
  78. Laura Pandolfi, Michela Bellini, Renzo Vanna, Carlo Morasso, Andrea Zago, Sofia Carcano, Svetlana Avvakumova, Jessica Armida Bertolini, Maria Antonietta Rizzuto, Miriam Colombo, and Davide Prosperi . H-Ferritin Enriches the Curcumin Uptake and Improves the Therapeutic Efficacy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18 (10) , 3318-3330. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00974
  79. Fatemeh Bahadori and Mutlu Demiray . A Realistic View on “The Essential Medicinal Chemistry of Curcumin”. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2017, 8 (9) , 893-896. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.7b00284
  80. Swarit Jasial, Ye Hu, and Jürgen Bajorath . How Frequently Are Pan-Assay Interference Compounds Active? Large-Scale Analysis of Screening Data Reveals Diverse Activity Profiles, Low Global Hit Frequency, and Many Consistently Inactive Compounds. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2017, 60 (9) , 3879-3886. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00154
  81. Kathryn M. Nelson, Jayme L. Dahlin, Jonathan Bisson, James Graham, Guido F. Pauli, and Michael A. Walters . Curcumin May (Not) Defy Science. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2017, 8 (5) , 467-470. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.7b00139
  82. Anna Vuorinen, Roger T. Engeli, Susanne Leugger, Fabio Bachmann, Muhammad Akram, Atanas G. Atanasov, Birgit Waltenberger, Veronika Temml, Hermann Stuppner, Liselotte Krenn, Sylvin B. Ateba, Dieudonné Njamen, Rohan A. Davis, Alex Odermatt, and Daniela Schuster . Potential Antiosteoporotic Natural Product Lead Compounds That Inhibit 17β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2. Journal of Natural Products 2017, 80 (4) , 965-974. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00950
  83. Govindarajan Padmanaban and Viswanathan A. Nagaraj . Curcumin May Defy Medicinal Chemists. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2017, 8 (3) , 274-274. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.7b00051
  84. Shunzheng Fang, Bin Zhang, Wei Xiang, Liujie Zheng, Xiaodong Wang, Song Li, Tongyi Zhang, Daibo Feng, Yunquan Gong, Jinhui Wu, Jing Yuan, Yaran Wu, Yizhen Zhu, Enli Liu, Zhenhong Ni. Natural products in osteoarthritis treatment: bridging basic research to clinical applications. Chinese Medicine 2024, 19 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-024-00899-w
  85. Mina Sadeghi Ganjeh, Ali Mazlomifar, Ashraf Sadat Shahvelayti, Shiva Khalili Moghaddam. Coumarin linked to 2-phenylbenzimidazole derivatives as potent α-glucosidase inhibitors. Scientific Reports 2024, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57673-z
  86. Sinan Ai, Yake Li, Huijuan Zheng, Meiling Zhang, Jiayin Tao, Weijing Liu, Liang Peng, Zhen Wang, Yaoxian Wang. Collision of herbal medicine and nanotechnology: a bibliometric analysis of herbal nanoparticles from 2004 to 2023. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2024, 22 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-024-02426-3
  87. Ruge Lin, Yi Wang, Huan Cheng, Xingqian Ye, Shiguo Chen, Haibo Pan. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate stabilizes aqueous curcumin by generating nanoparticles and its application in beverages. Food Chemistry 2024, 444 , 138655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.138655
  88. Hao Li, Shuai Wang, Zhengqiang Yang, Xianwei Meng, Meng Niu. Nanomaterials modulate tumor-associated macrophages for the treatment of digestive system tumors. Bioactive Materials 2024, 36 , 376-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.03.003
  89. Mehran Izadi, Nariman Sadri, Amirhossein Abdi, Mohammad Mahdi Raeis Zadeh, Dorsa jalaei, Mohammad Mahdi Ghazimoradi, Sara Shouri, Safa Tahmasebi. Longevity and anti-aging effects of curcumin supplementation. GeroScience 2024, 46 (3) , 2933-2950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-024-01092-5
  90. Shirin Ghotboddin Mohammadi, Marzieh Kafeshani, Mohammad Bagherniya, Prashant Kesharwani, Amirhossein Sahebkar. Exploring Curcumin's healing properties in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Food Bioscience 2024, 59 , 104144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2024.104144
  91. Yaqi Lu, Xiang Cai, Wenxin Lv, Cuicui Duan, Xiaolei Li, Fumin Ma, Dan Li. Multispectral analysis and molecular docking to predict the mechanism of molecular interactions of curcumin, zein and fucoidan complexes. Journal of Food Engineering 2024, 369 , 111953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2024.111953
  92. Xiaxia Jin, Wendi Dong, Kaile Chang, Yongmei Yan. Research on the signaling pathways related to the intervention of traditional Chinese medicine in Parkinson's disease:A literature review. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2024, 326 , 117850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2024.117850
  93. Xiaoxia Zhou, Xufang Ying, Linjie Wu, Liqin Liu, Ying Wang, Ying He, Min Han. Research Progress of Natural Product Photosensitizers in Photodynamic Therapy. Planta Medica 2024, 90 (05) , 368-379. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2257-9194
  94. Meng-Hsuan Cheng, Hsuan-Fu Kuo, Chia-Yuan Chang, Jui-Chi Chang, I.-Fan Liu, Chong-Chao Hsieh, Chih-Hsin Hsu, Chia-Yang Li, Shu-Chi Wang, Yung-Hsiang Chen, Chuang-Rung Chang, Tsung-Ying Lee, Yu-Ru Liu, Chi-Yuan Huang, Szu-Hui Wu, Wei-Lun Liu, Po-Len Liu. Curcumin regulates pulmonary extracellular matrix remodeling and mitochondrial function to attenuate pulmonary fibrosis by regulating the miR-29a-3p/DNMT3A axis. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2024, 174 , 116572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116572
  95. Cyriac Abby Philips, Arif Hussain Theruvath. A comprehensive review on the hepatotoxicity of herbs used in the Indian (Ayush) systems of alternative medicine. Medicine 2024, 103 (16) , e37903. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000037903
  96. Mansur Aliyu, Fatema Tuz Zohora, Ayca Ceylan, Fariha Hossain, Reza Yazdani, Gholamreza Azizi. Immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis: molecular and cellular mechanisms and new immunotherapeutic approaches. Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology 2024, 25 , 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923973.2024.2330642
  97. Elena Azzini, Sheila I. Peña‐Corona, Héctor Hernández‐Parra, Deepak Chandran, Lejaniya Abdul Kalam Saleena, Yousef Sawikr, Ilaria Peluso, Sangram Dhumal, Manoj Kumar, Gerardo Leyva‐Gómez, Miquel Martorell, Javad Sharifi‐Rad, Daniela Calina. Neuroprotective and anti‐inflammatory effects of curcumin in Alzheimer's disease: Targeting neuroinflammation strategies. Phytotherapy Research 2024, 34 https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.8200
  98. Nishi Gandha Gogoi, Aziza Rahman, Pankaj Dutta, Jiban Saikia, Anupaul Baruah, Jyotirekha G. Handique. Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and in Silico Studies of Curcumin Pyrrole Conjugates. Chemistry & Biodiversity 2024, 50 https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202301605
  99. Zhongxin Duan, Wenjie Zhou, Shi He, Wanyu Wang, Hongyi Huang, Linbin Yi, Rui Zhang, Junli Chen, Xin Zan, Chao You, Xiang Gao. Intranasal Delivery of Curcumin Nanoparticles Improves Neuroinflammation and Neurological Deficits in Mice with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Small Methods 2024, https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202400304
  100. Prerna Sharma, Nidhi Rani, Anjali Sharma, Vikas Sharma, Madhukar Garg. An Overview of the Pharmacological Potential of Curcuma longa. Current Traditional Medicine 2024, 10 (2) https://doi.org/10.2174/2215083810666230329222554
Load more citations
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Structural comparison of curcumin and artemisinin. Curcumin has been the focus of heavy research for new drug development. Artemisinin is an FDA approved antimalarial.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Comparison of publication frequency for biological studies of curcumin and artemisinin. The numbers of manuscripts per year were retrieved from SciFinder by searching for the substances curcumin (CAS no. 458-37-7) or artemisinin (CAS no. 63968-64-9) and then filtering by “biological study” and “document type” = journal. (Data accessed May 3, 2016.)

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Major phytoconstituents of extracts of Curcuma longa. Compounds 1, 3, and 4, often grouped together as “curcuminoids”, generally make up approximately 1–6% of turmeric by weight. (33) Of a curcuminoid extract, 1 makes up 60–70% by weight, while 3 (20–27%) and 4 (10–15%) are more minor components. The major constituent of a curcuminoid extract, 1, and the properties important for its consideration as a lead compound for therapeutic development are the focus of this review.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Tautomerization of compound 1. NMR studies show that compound 1 is not present in solution as the diketone (1a) but only as a mixture of the equally present (due to symmetry) enol structures (1b). (63)

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Major chemical degradation pathways of compound 1. (A) Solvolysis under alkaline pH in buffered aqueous solution rapidly leads to multiple fragmentation byproducts. (27) (B) Autoxidation in buffered medium creates a bicyclopentadione (8) that is the major degradation product in aqueous conditions. (66) (C) Photodegradation of 1 can occur when in crystalline form and dissolved in organic solvent. (68) (D) When dissolved in certain organic solvents (like isopropanol), photodegradation can include reaction with the solvent as a substrate. (69)

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 164 other publications.

    1. 1
      Yuan, D.; Yang, X.; Guo, J. C. A great honor and a huge challenge for China: You-you tu getting the nobel prize in physiology or medicine J. Zhejiang Univ., Sci., B 2016, 17, 405 408 DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1600094
    2. 2
      Hanson, M. Is the 2015 Nobel Prize a turning point for traditional Chinese medicine? https://theconversation.com/is-the-2015-nobel-prize-a-turning-point-for-traditional-chinese-medicine-48643 (accessed June 6, 2016) .
    3. 3
      Baell, J.; Walters, M. A. Chemistry: Chemical con artists foil drug discovery Nature (London, U. K.) 2014, 513, 481 483 DOI: 10.1038/513481a
    4. 4
      Bisson, J.; McAlpine, J. B.; Friesen, J. B.; Chen, S.-N.; Graham, J.; Pauli, G. F. Can invalid bioactives undermine natural product-based drug discovery? J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 1671 1690 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01009
    5. 5
      Burgos-Moron, E.; Calderon-Montano, J. M.; Salvador, J.; Robles, A.; Lopez-Lazaro, M. The dark side of curcumin Int. J. Cancer 2010, 126, 1771 1775 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24967
    6. 6
      Baell, J. B. Feeling nature’s PAINS: Natural products, natural product drugs, and pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 616 628 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00947
    7. 7
      Chin, D.; Huebbe, P.; Pallauf, K.; Rimbach, G. Neuroprotective properties of curcumin in Alzheimer’s disease - merits and limitations Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 3955 3985 DOI: 10.2174/09298673113209990210
    8. 8
      Glaser, J.; Holzgrabe, U. Focus on PAINS: False friends in the quest for selective anti-protozoal lead structures from nature? MedChemComm 2016, 7, 214 223 DOI: 10.1039/C5MD00481K
    9. 9
      Heger, M.; van Golen, R. F.; Broekgaarden, M.; Michel, M. C. The molecular basis for the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of curcumin and its metabolites in relation to cancers Pharmacol. Rev. 2014, 66, 222 307 DOI: 10.1124/pr.110.004044
    10. 10
      Elias, G.; Jacob, P. J.; Hareeshbabu, E.; Mathew, V. B.; Krishnan, B.; Krishnakumar, K. Curcumin: Transforming the spice to a wonder drug Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2015, 6, 2671 2680 DOI: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6(7).2671-80
    11. 11
      Neckers, L.; Trepel, J.; Lee, S.; Chung, E.-J.; Lee, M.-J.; Jung, Y.-J.; Marcu, M. G. Curcumin is an inhibitor of p300 histone acetyltransferase Med. Chem. (Sharjah, United Arab Emirates) 2006, 2, 169 174 DOI: 10.2174/157340606776056133
    12. 12
      Rainey-Smith, S. R.; Brown, B. M.; Sohrabi, H. R.; Shah, T.; Goozee, K. G.; Gupta, V. B.; Martins, R. N. Curcumin and cognition: A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of community-dwelling older adults Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 115, 2106 2113 DOI: 10.1017/S0007114516001203
    13. 13
      Okamura, T.; Kubo, K. Turmeric pigment-containing chocolate with excellent flavor, texture, and hangover prevention/treatment properties. JP2009183206A, 2009.
    14. 14
      Kwon, H. N. Functional noodles for relieving hangover and its manufacturing method. KR1314917B1, 2013.
    15. 15
      Rezq, E.-S. A. M.; Mansour, M. T. A.-A.; Kumosani, T. A. Long acting conserved natural functional groups curcumin. WO2010057503A2, 2010.
    16. 16
      Wang, A.; An, X.; Zhou, Y. Application of curcumin to medicinal preparations for treating erectile dysfunction. CN101822656A, 2010.
    17. 17
      Isaacs, E.; Cobbledick, T. Complete supplement formulae for maintenance of hair growth and condition. GB2484812A, 2012.
    18. 18
      Huh, S.; Lee, J.; Jung, E.; Kim, S.-C.; Kang, J.-I.; Lee, J.; Kim, Y.-W.; Sung, Y. K.; Kang, H.-K.; Park, D. A cell-based system for screening hair growth-promoting agents Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2009, 301, 381 385 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-009-0931-0
    19. 19
      Ahluwalia, G. S.; Shander, D.; Styczynski, P. Inhibition of hair growth with protein kinase C inhibitors. WO9609806A2, 1996.
    20. 20
      Jana, S.; Paul, S.; Swarnakar, S. Curcumin as anti-endometriotic agent: Implication of MMP-3 and intrinsic apoptotic pathway Biochem. Pharmacol. (Amsterdam, Neth.) 2012, 83, 797 804 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.12.030
    21. 21
      Naz, R. K.; Lough, M. L. Curcumin as a potential non-steroidal contraceptive with spermicidal and microbicidal properties Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2014, 176, 142 148 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.01.024
    22. 22
      Data pertaining to these claims are easily accessible by any Internet search engine, e.g., https://www.google.com/#q=curcumin+AND+health+benefits
    23. 23
      Goel, A.; Kunnumakkara, A. B.; Aggarwal, B. B. Curcumin as "curecumin": From kitchen to clinic Biochem. Pharmacol. (Amsterdam, Neth.) 2008, 75, 787 809 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.08.016
    24. 24
      Kumar, A.; Chetia, H.; Sharma, S.; Kabiraj, D.; Talukdar, N. C.; Bora, U. Curcumin resource database Database 2015, 2015, bav070 DOI: 10.1093/database/bav070
    25. 25
      Wang, J.; Zhang, C.-J.; Chia, W. N.; Loh, C. C. Y.; Li, Z.; Lee, Y. M.; He, Y.; Yuan, L.-X.; Lim, T. K.; Liu, M.; Liew, C. X.; Lee, Y. Q.; Zhang, J.; Lu, N.; Lim, C. T.; Hua, Z.-C.; Liu, B.; Shen, H.-M.; Tan, K. S. W.; Lin, Q. Haem-activated promiscuous targeting of artemisinin in Plasmodium falciparum Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 10111 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10111
    26. 26
      Medhi, B.; Patyar, S.; Rao, R. S.; Byrav, D. S. P.; Prakash, A. Pharmacokinetic and toxicological profile of artemisinin compounds: An update Pharmacology 2009, 84, 323 332 DOI: 10.1159/000252658
    27. 27
      Wang, Y.-J.; Pan, M.-H.; Cheng, A.-L.; Lin, L.-I.; Ho, Y.-S.; Hsieh, C.-Y.; Lin, J.-K. Stability of curcumin in buffer solutions and characterization of its degradation products J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1997, 15, 1867 1876 DOI: 10.1016/S0731-7085(96)02024-9
    28. 28
      Yang, K. Y.; Lin, L. C.; Tseng, T. Y.; Wang, S. C.; Tsai, T. H. Oral bioavailability of curcumin in rat and the herbal analysis from Curcuma longa by LC-MS/MS J. Chromatogr. B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2007, 853, 183 189 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.03.010
    29. 29
      Chow, S.-C.; Chiu, S.-T. A note on design and analysis of clinical trials Drug Des.: Open Access 2013, 2, 102 DOI: 10.4172/2169-0138.1000102
    30. 30
      National Institutes of Health. NIH RePORTER. Research portfolio online reporting tools. Reports, data, and analysis of NIH research activities. http://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm (accessed October 6, 2016) .
    31. 31
      Kuttan, R.; Bhanumathy, P.; Nirmala, K.; George, M. C. Potential anticancer activity of turmeric (Curcuma longa) Cancer Lett. (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 1985, 29, 197 202 DOI: 10.1016/0304-3835(85)90159-4
    32. 32
      Niranjan, A.; Singh, S.; Dhiman, M.; Tewari, S. K. Biochemical composition of Curcuma longa l. Accessions Anal. Lett. 2013, 46, 1069 1083 DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2012.751541
    33. 33
      Priyadarsini, K. I. The chemistry of curcumin: From extraction to therapeutic agent Molecules 2014, 19, 20091 20112 DOI: 10.3390/molecules191220091
    34. 34
      Food and Drug Administration Office of Food Additive Safety. Agency Response Letter GRAS Notice No. Grn 000460. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2013.
    35. 35
      Majeed, S. The state of the curcumin market. Natural Products Insider; Informa Exhibitions, 2015; http://www.naturalproductsinsider.com/articles/2015/12/the-state-of-the-curcumin-market.aspx.
    36. 36
      Niranjan, A.; Prakash, D. Chemical constituents and biological activities of turmeric (Curcuma longa l.) - a review J. Food Sci. Technol. (New Delhi, India) 2008, 45, 109 116
    37. 37
      Panahi, Y.; Hosseini, M. S.; Khalili, N.; Naimi, E.; Majeed, M.; Sahebkar, A. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of curcuminoid-piperine combination in subjects with metabolic syndrome: A randomized controlled trial and an updated meta-analysis Clin. Nutr. 2015, 34, 1101 1108 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.12.019
    38. 38
      Yue, G. G.; Chan, B. C.; Hon, P. M.; Lee, M. Y.; Fung, K. P.; Leung, P. C.; Lau, C. B. Evaluation of in vitro anti-proliferative and immunomodulatory activities of compounds isolated from Curcuma longa Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 2011 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.039
    39. 39
      Hu, S.; Maiti, P.; Ma, Q.; Zuo, X.; Jones, M. R.; Cole, G. M.; Frautschy, S. A. Clinical development of curcumin in neurodegenerative disease Expert Rev. Neurother. 2015, 15, 629 637 DOI: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1044981
    40. 40
      Baell, J. B.; Holloway, G. A. New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 2719 2740 DOI: 10.1021/jm901137j
    41. 41
      Fang, J.; Lu, J.; Holmgren, A. Thioredoxin reductase is irreversibly modified by curcumin: A novel molecular mechanism for its anticancer activity J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 25284 25290 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M414645200
    42. 42
      Jurrmann, N.; Birgelius-Flohe, R.; Boel, G.-F. Curcumin blocks interleukin-1 (IL-1) signaling by inhibiting the recruitment of the IL-1 receptor-associated kinase IRAK in murine thymoma EL-4 cells J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 1859 1864
    43. 43
      Jung, Y.; Xu, W.; Kim, H.; Ha, N.; Neckers, L. Curcumin-induced degradation of ErbB2: A role for the E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP and the Michael reaction acceptor activity of curcumin Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Res. 2007, 1773, 383 390 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.11.004
    44. 44
      Chin, D.; Huebbe, P.; Frank, J.; Rimbach, G.; Pallauf, K. Curcumin may impair iron status when fed to mice for six months Redox Biol. 2014, 2, 563 569 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2014.01.018
    45. 45
      Schneider, C.; Gordon, O. N.; Edwards, R. L.; Luis, P. B. Degradation of curcumin: From mechanism to biological implications J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 7606 7614 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b00244
    46. 46
      Duan, D.; Doak, A. K.; Nedyalkova, L.; Shoichet, B. K. Colloidal aggregation and the in vitro activity of traditional Chinese medicines ACS Chem. Biol. 2015, 10, 978 988 DOI: 10.1021/cb5009487
    47. 47
      Ingolfsson, H. I.; Thakur, P.; Herold, K. F.; Hobart, E. A.; Ramsey, N. B.; Periole, X.; de Jong, D. H.; Zwama, M.; Yilmaz, D.; Hall, K.; Maretzky, T.; Hemmings, H. C., Jr.; Blobel, C.; Marrink, S. J.; Kocer, A.; Sack, J. T.; Andersen, O. S. Phytochemicals perturb membranes and promiscuously alter protein function ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 1788 1798 DOI: 10.1021/cb500086e
    48. 48
      Priyadarsini, K. I. Photophysics, photochemistry and photobiology of curcumin: Studies from organic solutions, bio-mimetics and living cells J. Photochem. Photobiol., C 2009, 10, 81 95 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2009.05.001
    49. 49
      Esatbeyoglu, T.; Ulbrich, K.; Rehberg, C.; Rohn, S.; Rimbach, G. Thermal stability, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin and its degradation product 4-vinyl guaiacol Food Funct. 2015, 6, 887 893 DOI: 10.1039/C4FO00790E
    50. 50
      Avonto, C.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O.; Pollastro, F.; Minassi, A.; Di Marzo, V.; De Petrocellis, L.; Appendino, G. An NMR spectroscopic method to identify and classify thiol-trapping agents: Revival of Michael acceptors for drug discovery? Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 467 471 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201005959
    51. 51
      Pauli, G. F.; Chen, S. N.; Friesen, J. B.; McAlpine, J. B.; Jaki, B. U. Analysis and purification of bioactive natural products: The AnaPurNa study J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 1243 1255 DOI: 10.1021/np300066q
    52. 52
      Simmler, C.; Hajirahimkhan, A.; Lankin, D. C.; Bolton, J. L.; Jones, T.; Soejarto, D. D.; Chen, S. N.; Pauli, G. F. Dynamic residual complexity of the isoliquiritigenin-liquiritigenin interconversion during bioassay J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 2146 2157 DOI: 10.1021/jf304445p
    53. 53
      Gordon, O. N.; Luis, P. B.; Sintim, H. O.; Schneider, C. Unraveling curcumin degradation: Autoxidation proceeds through spiroepoxide and vinylether intermediates en route to the main bicyclopentadione J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 4817 4828 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.618785
    54. 54
      Workman, P.; Collins, I. Probing the probes: Fitness factors for small molecule tools Chem. Biol. (Oxford, U. K.) 2010, 17, 561 577 DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.05.013
    55. 55
      Singh, J.; Petter, R. C.; Baillie, T. A.; Whitty, A. The resurgence of covalent drugs Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2011, 10, 307 317 DOI: 10.1038/nrd3410
    56. 56
      Kalgutkar, A. S.; Dalvie, D. K. Drug discovery for a new generation of covalent drugs Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2012, 7, 561 581 DOI: 10.1517/17460441.2012.688744
    57. 57
      Schröder, J.; Klinger, A.; Oellien, F.; Marhoefer, R. J.; Duszenko, M.; Selzer, P. M. Docking-based virtual screening of covalently binding ligands: An orthogonal lead discovery approach J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 1478 1490 DOI: 10.1021/jm3013932
    58. 58
      Davids, M. S.; Brown, J. R. Ibrutinib: A first in class covalent inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase Future Oncol. 2014, 10, 957 967 DOI: 10.2217/fon.14.51
    59. 59
      Flanagan, M. E.; Abramite, J. A.; Anderson, D. P.; Aulabaugh, A.; Dahal, U. P.; Gilbert, A. M.; Li, C.; Montgomery, J.; Oppenheimer, S. R.; Ryder, T.; Schuff, B. P.; Uccello, D. P.; Walker, G. S.; Wu, Y.; Brown, M. F.; Chen, J. M.; Hayward, M. M.; Noe, M. C.; Obach, R. S.; Philippe, L.; Shanmugasundaram, V.; Shapiro, M. J.; Starr, J.; Stroh, J.; Che, Y. Chemical and computational methods for the characterization of covalent reactive groups for the prospective design of irreversible inhibitors J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 10072 10079 DOI: 10.1021/jm501412a
    60. 60
      Jost, C.; Nitsche, C.; Scholz, T.; Roux, L.; Klein, C. D. Promiscuity and selectivity in covalent enzyme inhibition: A systematic study of electrophilic fragments J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 7590 7599 DOI: 10.1021/jm5006918
    61. 61
      Mah, R.; Thomas, J. R.; Shafer, C. M. Drug discovery considerations in the development of covalent inhibitors Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 33 39 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.10.003
    62. 62
      Moghaddam, M. F.; Tang, Y.; O’Brien, Z.; Richardson, S. J.; Bacolod, M.; Chaturedi, P.; Apuy, J.; Kulkarni, A. A proposed screening paradigm for discovery of covalent inhibitor drugs Drug Metab. Lett. 2014, 8, 19 30 DOI: 10.2174/1872312808666140317151735
    63. 63
      Payton, F.; Sandusky, P.; Alworth, W. L. NMR study of the solution structure of curcumin J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 143 146 DOI: 10.1021/np060263s
    64. 64
      Jagannathan, R.; Abraham, P. M.; Poddar, P. Temperature-dependent spectroscopic evidences of curcumin in aqueous medium: A mechanistic study of its solubility and stability J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 14533 14540 DOI: 10.1021/jp3050516
    65. 65
      Takagi, T.; Ramachandran, C.; Bermejo, M.; Yamashita, S.; Yu, L. X.; Amidon, G. L. A provisional biopharmaceutical classification of the top 200 oral drug products in the United States, Great Britain, Spain, and Japan Mol. Pharmaceutics 2006, 3, 631 643 DOI: 10.1021/mp0600182
    66. 66
      Griesser, M.; Pistis, V.; Suzuki, T.; Tejera, N.; Pratt, D. A.; Schneider, C. Autoxidative and cyclooxygenase-2 catalyzed transformation of the dietary chemopreventive agent curcumin J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 1114 1124 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.178806
    67. 67
      Gordon, O. N.; Schneider, C. Vanillin and ferulic acid: Not the major degradation products of curcumin Trends Mol. Med. 2012, 18, 361 363

      (author reply, pp 363–364)

       DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.04.011
    68. 68
      Khurana, A.; Ho, C. T. High-performance liquid-chromatographic analysis of curcuminoids and their photo-oxidative decomposition compounds in Curcuma longa l J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1988, 11, 2295 2304 DOI: 10.1080/01483918808067200
    69. 69
      Tønnesen, H. H.; Karlsen, J.; van Henegouwen, G. B. Studies on curcumin and curcuminoids. VIII. Photochemical stability of curcumin Z. Lebensm.-Unters. Forsch. 1986, 183, 116 122 DOI: 10.1007/BF01041928
    70. 70
      Ghosh, M.; Singh, A. T.; Xu, W.; Sulchek, T.; Gordon, L. I.; Ryan, R. O. Curcumin nanodisks: Formulation and characterization Nanomedicine 2011, 7, 162 167 DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2010.08.002
    71. 71
      Sun, M.; Su, X.; Ding, B.; He, X.; Liu, X.; Yu, A.; Lou, H.; Zhai, G. Advances in nantoechnology-based delivery systems for curcumin Nanomedicine (London, U. K.) 2012, 7, 1085 1100 DOI: 10.2217/nnm.12.80
    72. 72
      Tamvakopoulos, C.; Dimas, K.; Sofianos, Z. D.; Hatziantoniou, S.; Han, Z.; Liu, Z. L.; Wyche, J. H.; Pantazis, P. Metabolism and anticancer activity of the curcumin analogue, dimethoxycurcumin Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 1269 1277 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1839
    73. 73
      Robinson, T. P.; Hubbard, R. B. t.; Ehlers, T. J.; Arbiser, J. L.; Goldsmith, D. J.; Bowen, J. P. Synthesis and biological evaluation of aromatic enones related to curcumin Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 4007 4013 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.03.054
    74. 74
      Liang, G.; Shao, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Chu, Y.; Xiao, J.; Zhao, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, S. Exploration and synthesis of curcumin analogues with improved structural stability both in vitro and in vivo as cytotoxic agents Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 2623 2631 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.10.044
    75. 75
      Lim, T.-G.; Lee, S.-Y.; Huang, Z.; Lim, D. Y.; Chen, H.; Jung, S. K.; Bode, A. M.; Lee, K. W.; Dong, Z. Curcumin suppresses proliferation of colon cancer cells by targeting CDK2 Cancer Prev. Res. 2014, 7, 466 474 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0387
    76. 76
      Balasubramanian, K. Molecular orbital basis for yellow curry spice curcumin’s prevention of Alzheimer’s disease J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 3512 3520 DOI: 10.1021/jf0603533
    77. 77
      Ciccone, L.; Tepshi, L.; Nencetti, S.; Stura, E. A. Transthyretin complexes with curcumin and bromo-estradiol: Evaluation of solubilizing multicomponent mixtures New Biotechnol. 2015, 32, 54 64 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2014.09.002
    78. 78
      Irwin, J. J.; Duan, D.; Torosyan, H.; Doak, A. K.; Ziebart, K. T.; Sterling, T.; Tumanian, G.; Shoichet, B. K. An aggregation advisor for ligand discovery J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 7076 7087 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01105
    79. 79
      Coan, K. E.; Shoichet, B. K. Stoichiometry and physical chemistry of promiscuous aggregate-based inhibitors J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9606 9612 DOI: 10.1021/ja802977h
    80. 80
      Coan, K. E. D.; Maltby, D. A.; Burlingame, A. L.; Shoichet, B. K. Promiscuous aggregate-based inhibitors promote enzyme unfolding J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 2067 2075 DOI: 10.1021/jm801605r
    81. 81
      Winter, S.; Tortik, N.; Kubin, A.; Krammer, B.; Plaetzer, K. Back to the roots: Photodynamic inactivation of bacteria based on water-soluble curcumin bound to polyvinylpyrrolidone as a photosensitizer Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2013, 12, 1795 1802 DOI: 10.1039/c3pp50095k
    82. 82
      Siviero, A.; Gallo, E.; Maggini, V.; Gori, L.; Mugelli, A.; Firenzuoli, F.; Vannacci, A. Curcumin, a golden spice with a low bioavailability Journal of Herbal Medicine 2015, 5, 57 70 DOI: 10.1016/j.hermed.2015.03.001
    83. 83
      Lao, C. D.; Ruffin, M. T. I. V.; Normolle, D.; Heath, D. D.; Murray, S. I.; Bailey, J. M.; Boggs, M. E.; Crowell, J.; Rock, C. L.; Brenner, D. E. Dose escalation of a curcuminoid formulation BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2006, 6, 10 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-6-10
    84. 84
      Wahlang, B.; Pawar, Y. B.; Bansal, A. K. Identification of permeability-related hurdles in oral delivery of curcumin using the Caco-2 cell model Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2011, 77, 275 282 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.12.006
    85. 85
      Volpe, D. A.; Faustino, P. J.; Ciavarella, A. B.; Asafu-Adjaye, E. B.; Ellison, C. D.; Yu, L. X.; Hussain, A. S. Classification of drug permeability with a Caco-2 cell monolayer assay Clin. Res. Regul. Aff. 2007, 24, 39 47 DOI: 10.1080/10601330701273669
    86. 86
      Suresh, D.; Srinivasan, K. Tissue distribution & elimination of capsaicin, piperine & curcumin following oral intake in rats Indian J. Med. Res. 2010, 131, 682 691
    87. 87
      Ravindranath, V.; Chandrasekhara, N. Absorption and tissue distribution of curcumin in rats Toxicology 1980, 16, 259 265 DOI: 10.1016/0300-483X(80)90122-5
    88. 88
      Ravindranath, V.; Chandrasekhara, N. Metabolism of curcumin - studies with [3H]curcumin Toxicology 1982, 22, 337 344 DOI: 10.1016/0300-483X(81)90027-5
    89. 89
      Mathews, S.; Rao, M. N. A. Interaction of curcumin with glutathione Int. J. Pharm. (Amsterdam, Neth.) 1991, 76, 257 259 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5173(91)90278-V
    90. 90
      Asai, A.; Miyazawa, T. Occurrence of orally administered curcuminoid as glucuronide and glucuronide/sulfate conjugates in rat plasma Life Sci. 2000, 67, 2785 2793 DOI: 10.1016/S0024-3205(00)00868-7
    91. 91
      Sharma, R. A.; McLelland, H. R.; Hill, K. A.; Ireson, C. R.; Euden, S. A.; Manson, M. M.; Pirmohamed, M.; Marnett, L. J.; Gescher, A. J.; Steward, W. P. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic study of oral Curcuma extract in patients with colorectal cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 2001, 7, 1894 1900
    92. 92
      Garcea, G.; Berry, D. P.; Jones, D. J. L.; Singh, R.; Dennison, A. R.; Farmer, P. B.; Sharma, R. A.; Steward, W. P.; Gescher, A. J. Consumption of the putative chemopreventative agent curcumin by cancer patients: Assessment of curcumin levels in the colorectum and their pharmacodynamic consequences Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers Prev. 2005, 14, 120 125
    93. 93
      Johnson, J. J.; Mukhtar, H. Curcumin for chemoprevention of colon cancer Cancer Lett. (N. Y., NY, U. S.) 2007, 255, 170 181 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.03.005
    94. 94
      Vareed, S. K.; Kakarala, M.; Ruffin, M. T.; Crowell, J. A.; Normolle, D. P.; Djuric, Z.; Brenner, D. E. Pharmacokinetics of curcumin conjugate metabolites in healthy human subjects Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers Prev. 2008, 17, 1411 1417 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2693
    95. 95
      Chan, E.; Tan, M.; Xin, J.; Sudarsanam, S.; Johnson, D. E. Interactions between traditional Chinese medicines and western therapeutics Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2010, 13, 50 65
    96. 96
      Hong, D. H.; Son, Y. K.; Choi, I.-W.; Park, W. S. The inhibitory effect of curcumin on voltage-dependent K+ channels in rabbit coronary arterial smooth muscle cells Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 430, 307 312 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.10.132
    97. 97
      Bamba, Y.; Yun, Y. S.; Kunugi, A.; Inoue, H. Compounds isolated from Curcuma aromatica Salisb. inhibit human P450 enzymes J. Nat. Med. 2011, 65, 583 587 DOI: 10.1007/s11418-011-0507-0
    98. 98
      Gupta, S. C.; Kismali, G.; Aggarwal, B. B. Curcumin, a component of turmeric: From farm to pharmacy BioFactors 2013, 39, 2 13 DOI: 10.1002/biof.1079
    99. 99
      Schramm, A.; Jahne, E. A.; Baburin, I.; Hering, S.; Hamburger, M. Natural products as potential human ether-a-go-go-related gene channel inhibitors - outcomes from a screening of widely used herbal medicines and edible plants Planta Med. 2014, 80, 1045 1050 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1382907
    100. 100
      Xia, M.; Shahane, S. A.; Huang, R.; Titus, S. A.; Shum, E.; Zhao, Y.; Southall, N.; Zheng, W.; Witt, K. L.; Tice, R. R.; Austin, C. P. Identification of quaternary ammonium compounds as potent inhibitors of hERG potassium channels Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2011, 252, 250 258 DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.02.016
    101. 101
      Hu, C.-W.; Sheng, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, H.-B.; Xie, X.; Ma, W.-C.; Huo, R.; Dong, D.-L. Curcumin inhibits hERG potassium channels in vitro Toxicol. Lett. 2012, 208, 192 196 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.11.005
    102. 102
      Zhang, G.; Nitteranon, V.; Chan, L. Y.; Parkin, K. L. Glutathione conjugation attenuates biological activities of 6-dehydroshogaol from ginger Food Chem. 2013, 140, 1 8 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.02.073
    103. 103
      McFadden, R.-M. T.; Larmonier, C. B.; Shehab, K. W.; Midura-Kiela, M.; Ramalingam, R.; Harrison, C. A.; Besselsen, D. G.; Chase, J. H.; Caporaso, J. G.; Jobin, C.; Ghishan, F. K.; Kiela, P. R. The role of curcumin in modulating colonic microbiota during colitis and colon cancer prevention Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 2483 2494 DOI: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000522
    104. 104
      Gupta, S. C.; Prasad, S.; Kim, J. H.; Patchva, S.; Webb, L. J.; Priyadarsini, I. K.; Aggarwal, B. B. Multitargeting by curcumin as revealed by molecular interaction studies Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011, 28, 1937 1955 DOI: 10.1039/c1np00051a
    105. 105
      Ghosh, S.; Banerjee, S.; Sil, P. C. The beneficial role of curcumin on inflammation, diabetes and neurodegenerative disease: A recent update Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 83, 111 124 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.05.022
    106. 106
      Oliveira, A. S.; Sousa, E.; Vasconcelos, M. H.; Pinto, M. Curcumin: A natural lead for potential new drug candidates Curr. Med. Chem. 2015, 22, 4196 4232 DOI: 10.2174/0929867322666151029104611
    107. 107
      Kundu, P.; Mohanty, C.; Sahoo, S. K. Antiglioma activity of curcumin-loaded lipid nanoparticles and its enhanced bioavailability in brain tissue for effective glioblastoma therapy Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 2670 2687 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.048
    108. 108
      Dilnawaz, F.; Singh, A.; Sahoo, S. K. Transferrin-conjugated curcumin-loaded superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles induce augmented cellular uptake and apoptosis in K562 cells Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 704 719 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.10.022
    109. 109
      Ni, Z.; Xing, F.; Wang, P.; Cao, G. Retracted: Synthesis, characterization and release of curcumin-intercalated Mg–Al-layered double hydroxides Appl. Clay Sci. 2008, 40, 72 80 DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2007.07.008
    110. 110
      Tomita, M.; Kawakami, H.; Uchihara, J. N.; Okudaira, T.; Masuda, M.; Takasu, N.; Matsuda, T.; Ohta, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Mori, N. Curcumin suppresses constitutive activation of AP-1 by downregulation of Jund protein in HTLV-1-infected T-cell lines Leuk. Res. 2006, 30, 313 321 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.08.004
    111. 111
      Mishra, A.; Kumar, R.; Tyagi, A.; Kohaar, I.; Hedau, S.; Bharti, A. C.; Sarker, S.; Dey, D.; Saluja, D.; Das, B. Curcumin modulates cellular AP-1, NF-kB, and HPV16 E6 proteins in oral cancer ecancer 2015, 9, 525 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2015.525
    112. 112
      Tomita, M. Retraction: Curcumin targets Akt cell survival signaling pathway in HTLV-I-infected T-cell lines Cancer Sci. 2011, 102, 499 DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01831.x
    113. 113
      Balasubramanyam, K.; Varier, R. A.; Altaf, M.; Swaminathan, V.; Siddappa, N. B.; Ranga, U.; Kundu, T. K. Curcumin, a novel p300/CREB-binding protein-specific inhibitor of acetyltransferase, represses the acetylation of histone/nonhistone proteins and histone acetyltransferase-dependent chromatin transcription J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 51163 51171 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M409024200
    114. 114
      Simon, R. P.; Robaa, D.; Alhalabi, Z.; Sippl, W.; Jung, M. Katching-up on small molecule modulators of lysine acetyltransferases J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 1249 1270 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01502
    115. 115
      Lu, X.; Deng, Y.; Yu, D.; Cao, H.; Wang, L.; Liu, L.; Yu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, X.; Yu, G. Histone acetyltransferase p300 mediates histone acetylation of PS1 and BACE1 in a cellular model of Alzheimer’s disease PLoS One 2014, 9, e103067 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103067
    116. 116
      Cui, L.; Miao, J.; Cui, L. Cytotoxic effect of curcumin on malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum: Inhibition of histone acetylation and generation of reactive oxygen species Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 488 494 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01238-06
    117. 117
      Kutluay, S. B.; Doroghazi, J.; Roemer, M. E.; Triezenberg, S. J. Curcumin inhibits herpes simplex virus immediate-early gene expression by a mechanism independent of p300/CBP histone acetyltransferase activity Virology 2008, 373, 239 247 DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.11.028
    118. 118
      Kang, S.-K.; Cha, S.-H.; Jeon, H.-G. Curcumin-induced histone hypoacetylation enhances caspase-3-dependent glioma cell death and neurogenesis of neural progenitor cells Stem Cells Dev. 2006, 15, 165 174 DOI: 10.1089/scd.2006.15.165
    119. 119
      Chen, W.; Bacanamwo, M.; Harrison, D. G. Activation of p300 histone acetyltransferase activity is an early endothelial response to laminar shear stress and is essential for stimulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase mRNA transcription J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 16293 16298 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M801803200
    120. 120
      Chiu, J.; Khan, Z. A.; Farhangkhoee, H.; Chakrabarti, S. Curcumin prevents diabetes-associated abnormalities in the kidneys by inhibiting p300 and nuclear factor-kappaB Nutrition 2009, 25, 964 972 DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.12.007
    121. 121
      Collins, H. M.; Abdelghany, M. K.; Messmer, M.; Yue, B.; Deeves, S. E.; Kindle, K. B.; Mantelingu, K.; Aslam, A.; Winkler, G. S.; Kundu, T. K.; Heery, D. M. Differential effects of garcinol and curcumin on histone and p53 modifications in tumour cells BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 37 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-37
    122. 122
      Dahlin, J. L.; Nissink, J. W. M.; Strasser, J. M.; Francis, S.; Higgins, L.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Z.; Walters, M. A. PAINS in the assay: Chemical mechanisms of assay interference and promiscuous enzymatic inhibition observed during a sulfhydryl-scavenging HTS J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 2091 2113 DOI: 10.1021/jm5019093
    123. 123
      Bora-Tatar, G.; Dayangac-Erden, D.; Demir, A. S.; Dalkara, S.; Yelekci, K.; Erdem-Yurter, H. Molecular modifications on carboxylic acid derivatives as potent histone deacetylase inhibitors: Activity and docking studies Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 5219 5228 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.05.042
    124. 124
      Wang, S.-H.; Lin, P.-Y.; Chiu, Y.-C.; Huang, J.-S.; Kuo, Y.-T.; Wu, J.-C.; Chen, C.-C. Curcumin-mediated HDAC inhibition suppresses the DNA damage response and contributes to increased DNA damage sensitivity PLoS One 2015, 10, e0134110/0134111 e0134110/0134119 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134110
    125. 125
      Link, A.; Balaguer, F.; Goel, A. Cancer chemoprevention by dietary polyphenols: Promising role for epigenetics Biochem. Pharmacol. (Amsterdam, Neth.) 2010, 80, 1771 1792 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.06.036
    126. 126
      Rajendran, P.; Ho, E.; Williams, D. E.; Dashwood, R. H. Dietary phytochemicals, HDAC inhibition, and DNA damage/repair defects in cancer cells Clin. Epigenet. 2011, 3, 4 DOI: 10.1186/1868-7083-3-4
    127. 127
      Bustanji, Y.; Taha, M. O.; Almasri, I. M.; Al-Ghussein, M. A. S.; Mohammad, M. K.; Alkhatib, H. S. Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase by curcumin: Investigation by simulated molecular docking and subsequent in vitro/in vivo evaluation J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2009, 24, 771 778 DOI: 10.1080/14756360802364377
    128. 128
      Di Martino, R. M.; De Simone, A.; Andrisano, V.; Bisignano, P.; Bisi, A.; Gobbi, S.; Rampa, A.; Fato, R.; Bergamini, C.; Perez, D. I.; Martinez, A.; Bottegoni, G.; Cavalli, A.; Belluti, F. Versatility of the curcumin scaffold: Discovery of potent and balanced dual BACE-1 and GSK-3beta inhibitors J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 531 544 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00894
    129. 129
      Zhang, X.; Yin, W. K.; Shi, X. D.; Li, Y. Curcumin activates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway through inhibiting the activity of GSK-3beta in APPswe transfected SY5Y cells Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 42, 540 546 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.02.009
    130. 130
      Yun, J. H.; Park, Y. G.; Lee, K. M.; Kim, J.; Nho, C. W. Curcumin induces apoptotic cell death via Oct4 inhibition and GSK-3beta activation in NCCIT cells Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 1053 1062 DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201400739
    131. 131
      Xiong, Z.; Hongmei, Z.; Lu, S.; Yu, L. Curcumin mediates presenilin-1 activity to reduce β-amyloid production in a model of Alzheimer’s disease Pharmacol. Rep. 2011, 63, 1101 1108 DOI: 10.1016/S1734-1140(11)70629-6
    132. 132
      Dahlin, J. L.; Inglese, J.; Walters, M. A. Mitigating risk in academic preclinical drug discovery Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2015, 14, 279 294 DOI: 10.1038/nrd4578
    133. 133
      Yang, F.; Lim, G. P.; Begum, A. N.; Ubeda, O. J.; Simmons, M. R.; Ambegaokar, S. S.; Chen, P. P.; Kayed, R.; Glabe, C. G.; Frautschy, S. A.; Cole, G. M. Curcumin inhibits formation of amyloid beta oligomers and fibrils, binds plaques, and reduces amyloid in vivo J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 5892 5901 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M404751200
    134. 134
      Hudson, S. A.; Ecroyd, H.; Kee, T. W.; Carver, J. A. The thioflavin T fluorescence assay for amyloid fibril detection can be biased by the presence of exogenous compounds FEBS J. 2009, 276, 5960 5972 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07307.x
    135. 135
      Thapa, A.; Jett, S. D.; Chi, E. Y. Curcumin attenuates amyloid-β aggregate toxicity and modulates amyloid-β aggregation pathway ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2016, 7, 56 68 DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00214
    136. 136
      Kayed, R.; Head, E.; Thompson, J. L.; McIntire, T. M.; Milton, S. C.; Cotman, C. W.; Glabe, C. G. Common structure of soluble amyloid oligomers implies common mechanism of pathogenesis Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 2003, 300, 486 489 DOI: 10.1126/science.1079469
    137. 137
      Feng, B. Y.; Shoichet, B. K. A detergent-based assay for the detection of promiscuous inhibitors Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 550 553 DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2006.77
    138. 138
      Egan, M. E.; Pearson, M.; Weiner, S. A.; Rajendran, V.; Rubin, D.; Gloeckner-Pagel, J.; Canny, S.; Du, K.; Lukacs, G. L.; Caplan, M. J. Curcumin, a major constituent of turmeric, corrects cystic fibrosis defects Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 2004, 304, 600 602 DOI: 10.1126/science.1093941
    139. 139
      Song, Y.; Sonawane, N. D.; Salinas, D.; Qian, L.; Pedemonte, N.; Galietta, L. J. V.; Verkman, A. S. Evidence against the rescue of defective ΔF508-CFTR cellular processing by curcumin in cell culture and mouse models J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 40629 40633 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M407308200
    140. 140
      Dey, I.; Shah, K.; Bradbury, N. A. Natural compounds as therapeutic agents in the treatment cystic fibrosis J. Genet. Syndr. Gene Ther. 2016, 7, 284 DOI: 10.4172/2157-7412.1000284
    141. 141
      Seely, K. A.; Levi, M. S.; Prather, P. L. The dietary polyphenols trans-resveratrol and curcumin selectively bind human CB1 cannabinoid receptors with nanomolar affinities and function as antagonists/inverse agonists J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009, 330, 31 39 DOI: 10.1124/jpet.109.151654
    142. 142
      Prather, P. L.; Seely, K. A.; Levi, M. S. Notice of retraction J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009, 331, 1147
    143. 143
      Sharma, C.; Sadek, B.; Goyal, S. N.; Sinha, S.; Kamal, M. A.; Ojha, S. Small molecules from nature targeting G-protein coupled cannabinoid receptors: Potential leads for drug discovery and development Evidence-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 238482 DOI: 10.1155/2015/238482
    144. 144
      Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Part 182: Substances Generally Recognized as Safe. Section 182.20 Essential oils, oleoresins (solvent-free), and natural extractives (including distillates). U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2016.
    145. 145
      Ringman, J. M.; Bardens, J.; Apostolova, L. G.; Frautschy, S. A.; Teng, E.; Cole, G. M.; Begum, A. N.; Beigi, M.; Gylys, K. H.; Badmaev, V.; Heath, D. D.; Porter, V.; Vanek, Z.; Marshall, G. A.; Hellemann, G.; Sugar, C.; Masterman, D. L.; Montine, T. J.; Cummings, J. L. Oral curcumin for Alzheimer’s disease: Tolerability and efficacy in a 24-week randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study Alzheimer's Res. Ther. 2012, 4, 43 DOI: 10.1186/alzrt146
    146. 146
      Pfizer. Bioequivalence study comparing a new 10 mg atorvastatin tablet to a 10 mg atorvastatin commercial tablet. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00917579, 2009
    147. 147
      Sharma, R. A.; Euden, S. A.; Platton, S. L.; Cooke, D. N.; Shafayat, A.; Hewitt, H. R.; Marczylo, T. H.; Morgan, B.; Hemingway, D.; Plummer, S. M.; Pirmohamed, M.; Gescher, A. J.; Steward, W. P. Phase I clinical trial of oral curcumin: Biomarkers of systemic activity and compliance Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 6847 6854 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0744
    148. 148
      Dhillon, N.; Aggarwal, B. B.; Newman, R. A.; Wolff, R. A.; Kunnumakkara, A. B.; Abbruzzese, J. L.; Ng, C. S.; Badmaev, V.; Kurzrock, R. Phase II trial of curcumin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 4491 4499 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0024
    149. 149
      Asher, G. N.; Spelman, K. Clinical utility of curcumin extract Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2013, 19, 20 22
    150. 150
      Gupta, S. C.; Patchva, S.; Aggarwal, B. B. Therapeutic roles of curcumin: Lessons learned from clinical trials AAPS J. 2013, 15, 195 218 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-012-9432-8
    151. 151
      Hsu, C.-H.; Cheng, A.-L. Clinical studies with curcumin Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2007, 595, 471 480 DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-46401-5_21
    152. 152
      Oppenheimer, A. Turmeric (curcumin) in biliary diseases Lancet 1937, 229, 619 621 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)98193-5
    153. 153
      National Institutes of Health. "ClinicalTrials.gov." Registry and results database of clinical studies of human participants. http://clinicaltrials.gov (accessed October 6, 2016) .
    154. 154
      Hurlstone, D. P.; Karajeh, M.; Sanders, D. S.; Drew, S. K.; Cross, S. S. Rectal aberrant crypt foci identified using high-magnification-chromoscopic colonoscopy: Biomarkers for flat and depressed neoplasia Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2005, 100, 1283 1289 DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40891.x
    155. 155
      Mattson, M. P.; Cheng, A. Neurohormetic phytochemicals: Low-dose toxins that induce adaptive neuronal stress responses Trends Neurosci. 2006, 29, 632 639 DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2006.09.001
    156. 156
      Brondino, N.; Re, S.; Boldrini, A.; Cuccomarino, A.; Lanati, N.; Barale, F.; Politi, P. Curcumin as a therapeutic agent in dementia: A mini systematic review of human studies Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 174282 DOI: 10.1155/2014/174282
    157. 157
      Chandra, V.; Pandav, R.; Dodge, H. H.; Johnston, J. M.; Belle, S. H.; DeKosky, S. T.; Ganguli, M. Incidence of Alzheimer’s disease in a rural community in India: The Indo-US study Neurology 2001, 57, 985 989 DOI: 10.1212/WNL.57.6.985
    158. 158
      Ng, T.-P.; Chiam, P.-C.; Lee, T.; Chua, H.-C.; Lim, L.; Kua, E.-H. Curry consumption and cognitive function in the elderly Am. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 164, 898 906 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj267
    159. 159
      Li, S.; Yuan, W.; Deng, G.; Wang, P.; Yang, P.; Aggarwal, B. B. Chemical composition and product quality control of turmeric (Curcuma longa l.) Pharm. Crops 2011, 2, 28 54 DOI: 10.2174/2210290601102010028
    160. 160
      Clark, C. M.; Sheppard, L.; Fillinbaum, G. G.; Galasko, D.; Morris, J. C.; Koss, E.; Mohs, R.; Heyman, A. Variability in annual mini-mental state examination score in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease Arch. Neurol. (Chicago) 1999, 56, 857 862 DOI: 10.1001/archneur.56.7.857
    161. 161
      Dahlin, J. L.; Walters, M. A. The essential roles of chemistry in high-throughput screening triage Future Med. Chem. 2014, 6, 1265 1290 DOI: 10.4155/fmc.14.60
    162. 162
      Atanasov, A. G.; Waltenberger, B.; Pferschy-Wenzig, E. M.; Linder, T.; Wawrosch, C.; Uhrin, P.; Temml, V.; Wang, L.; Schwaiger, S.; Heiss, E. H.; Rollinger, J. M.; Schuster, D.; Breuss, J. M.; Bochkov, V.; Mihovilovic, M. D.; Kopp, B.; Bauer, R.; Dirsch, V. M.; Stuppner, H. Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: A review Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1582 1614 DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.08.001
    163. 163
      Wagner, H. Synergy research: Approaching a new generation of phytopharmaceuticals Fitoterapia 2011, 82, 34 37 DOI: 10.1016/j.fitote.2010.11.016
    164. 164
      Gertsch, J. The metabolic plant feedback hypothesis: How plant secondary metabolites nonspecifically impact human health Planta Med. 2016, 82, 920 929 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-108340
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00975.

    • Supplemental Tables 1, 2, and 3 of assays, half-lives, and activities, along with a discussion of covalent protein modification by 1 (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect