Hey guys, here’s some more of your great music. Here, admire this:

https://mobile.twitter.com/UltraDane/status/1609601702390530048/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1609601702390530048&currentTweetUser=UltraDane

Well i got kicked off twitter already. That’s ok, i think i’m kicked off here, too.

Trump was a mirage.

Jews have controlled him his entire life.

He was created by them, to serve their purposes.

Spent a day with the clown before he was president… narcissistic and delusional from the go.

Ye is a bigger clown.

Uses words he doesn’t even know, to try and sound other-worldly wise.

He’s a zero going backwards now.

DeSantis is a complete puppet of the Jooz.

Last chances this country had were Pat Buchanan and Ross Perot.

Satan wins. Jooz are his people. The control the Show.

Watching Anglin’s head explode is about as funny as watching Trump suck off all the jews that own him.

I suppose we all remember that picture of Klaus Schwab at the beach in a cock sock, garter, truss and hat?

Well, at this rate we’ll soon see Trump at the beach in the same outfit. Two more weeks.

Trump is controlled opposition. They are ALL IN ON IT! Crooks and liars the whole lot of them, or they would not be allowed to play!

Trump did appoint three of the judges who voted to overturn Roe, so pro-lifers have to give him that. And his administration was the one that prevented the state department from flying the rainbow flag. He’s not a conservative, he’s not a nationalist, but he scares the deep state and he’s better than every democrat out there. He’s too old to run, but if he gets the nomination, it’s either vote for him or vote for an openly anti-White dem.

Lol you lived under a rock for your entire life if you didn’t know Trump isn’t a fundie

Yeah, I’d never vote for DeSantis. So I guess Ye is my candidate for ‘24 as well.

Trump was a huge waste of money and energy. What we need is a collapse. It is the only way forward.

Well hell, Lincoln was a huge fairy.

How about Senator Rand Paul for the nomination?

Trump is right on abortion. The Supreme Court decision cost the Republicans its expected Red Wave and control of both Houses. I hope that the anti-abortion community, a minority in the country as shown by its loss of every state referendum that was on the ballot, is happy. For the demonic democrats the Court decision is the gift that will keep on giving in future elections.

Ewwww! Yuck! That’s not photoshopped?

I’m perfectly willing to believe it isn’t. And it wouldn’t surprise me one bit.
But, well, Ewww! and Yuck! just the same.

The only reason I can’t suggest or recommend UNZ.com. Andrew Anglin. Beyond profane. Beyond bizarre.

Put him behind a wall of some sort. Occasionally he is a worthwhile read. BUT…

…change his name to Zanglin, or Z Anglin at least he would be further down..

Well his campaign theme song was YMCA by The Village People.

Anglin is a transcendent artistic and intellectual genius. The only valid criterion for criticism of his work is aesthetic. Mortal, he occasionally overdoes it, but not here and not in his essay on the rabbi leaving Russia. His work at the daily stormer recently on gay and trans issues is on par with Moliere, Voltaire, Swift or Titus Petronius. I sincerely hope Ron continues to give Andrew his voice. You do have to understand one fundamental thing at the minimum to appreciate Andrew though – we are living in Clown World version X.0. I don’t know what X equals at the moment. Possibly Andrew does to a good approximation. He certainly knows it’s Clown World though.

Fuck that vile jew-loving self-pitying pile of filth. While his dimwitted redneck followers rot in Biden’s gulag for him, he’s giving trannies rim jobs and endorsing child-murder.
Abortion is not just an issue for religious believers. Support for legalized abortion is support for the slutocracy and the transhumanist depop agenda. Yeah I get it, it’s mostly ghetto baby mamas killing their spawn, but there are solutions to the black problem (racial separatism, for starters) that don’t involve giving women the freedom to fuck like hyenas and then bludgeon their fetuses. Anyone who thinks such barbaric degeneracy can be confined to the blacks is shockingly naive. Fifty years of legalized abortion didn’t do much for the virtue of white women, did it?
Anyway, fuck Trump, he can go sell his ass to the IDF. I’d vote for a dead dog over him.

the photo tells you alot about the hidden meaning of “transhumanism”.

I finally understand why Anglin supports Ye for the office of President of The United States of America. And I can’t think of another human being nearly, remotely as qualified. Maybe if brain transplantation is perfected, but not till then.

After watching Ron Paul get bushwacked in the republican primaries of 07, I realized there was no political way this duopolistic apple cart was getting turned over.
Now any voting I do is either a protest vote or a local/referendum issue. But I would consider a vote for trump to be sort of a protest vote.
But honestly there’s no voting our way out of this mess, economic collapse is the most likely scenario.

I appreciate that people argue the abortion issue on its merits but unfortunately it misses entirely what’s going on to do that. The abortion thing was overturned for one reason only – the military wants more warm bodies.

It isn’t, in my opinion, even up for discussion though of course it should be. The USA is a financial-capital dominated oligarchy and praetorian military dictatorship and has been for decades.

the photo gives you a glimpse of what the fourth industrial revolution is all about.

‘The man is totally rudderless. He is flopping around. He has no plan at all, and he’s abandoned his strategy of following his instincts. He’s being advised by the Jews. It’s a disaster. This nigga is truly stumped.’

Enough said.

Trump, who was never anti-abortion until he decided to run as a Republican, is hoist on his own petard. Prior to the overturning of Roe v Wade, abortion wasn’t a concrete issue for the one-issue pro-abortion voter — abortion was legal. With the change, it became clear that one-issue pro-abortion voters outnumber one-issue anti-abortion voters.

Trump is right about the politics of it all, not that it will help him get anywhere.

The Log Cabin Republicans are known to be a rather stodgy, not flaming, group. This is a fairly typical event photo.

I am sure that with effort, a tiny number of outlier pictures could be found. However, the idea that a “gay sex party” occurred at Mar-a-Lago is absurd. Everyone has a smart phone these days. Where are the videos?

I am not sure why Anglin is shilling for a stance that aligns with DoD Lawyer DeSantis’s campaign. Does the country need a DeNeocon President? Sane people say “NO!” to that idea.

If Anglin does not want Trump or DeNeocon, what serious candidate does he think can win? President Yeezy & VP Fuentes is an impossible aspiration.

PEACE 😇

It will come out soon that Trump has been living a dual life for years, will come out of the closet, leave Melania, and move in with Lindsay, Lindsay Graham that is. Don’t they make a cute couple?

He’s too old to run

I think Trump is unique. He is 70 something with the energy,
stamina, mental clarity of a healthy 40 yr old.

Yep, it’s either Trump or the Sh*t State.
It’s either totalitarianism or a chance at freedom.

On first observation, it looks kind of like Trump.

So, there’s a chance

Anglin’s style is pure hyperbole, and even his extensive detractors always seem to magically find time to check in. I’m sure there’s an erudite, 5000 word treatment of our current demise hy some Thomas Fleming type (replete with untranslated Latin quotes from Aeschylus) gathering dust in some Internet mothball metaphor out there somewhere, but who cares? Anyway, I can’t find much to disagree with in this article here. For decades I’ve watched the United States circle the cultural drain and to watch these “conservatives” shuck and jive about “LGBTQ+ rights” or whatever is beyond nauseating. It has crossed the line from realpolitik to pure evil.

Like most Americans, you may be under the impression that the supreme court decision imposed some sort of federal ban on abortion; it did not.

The decision rightly returns the issue to the States, where it always should have been under the Tenth Amendment. Both pro-life and pro-choice people who want to impose their view through federal law are trying to short-circuit the 50-plus debates over abortion policy that should be taking place only at the state and territorial level.

Here in the real world, the states of California, New York, Illinois, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Washington, Oregon, Colorado, Maryland, New Hampshire, Montana, and others have or are passing statutes further cementing the “right” of a mother to hire a “doctor” to chop up and murder her own helpless innocent child.

Having said all that, if the supreme court “justices” in the (pro-Tenth Amendment) majority were concerned about Republicans doing well on election night, they might have taken care to hold the decision until after that date. This rests on the sad but likely true premise that most Americans, and most registered voters, believe that they should have a right to kill innocent human beings before they’re born, and that some of them will fervently oppose candidates who do not “recognize” that “right.”

damn, i clicked that “losangelesblade.com” link thinking it was going to be some cool new right thought site out in the cultural siberia of amerika………..NOPE

got me thinking: why are nazi sites banned but faggot sites revered. i’m all about equality so it’s just odd. i knew a guy who got banished to nigeria for posting nazi memes. nazi memes never harmed children, but lgbtq pedos did. faggot websites should be banned.

Kanye West would not be a serious candidate.

As for DeSantis, who cares whether he’s going to criticize Trump for slavish support of the homosexual agenda. I don’t intend to vote DeSantis in next year’s Repub primary, and his opinion doesn’t affect mine.

We should hold it against Trump or any other candidate or “officeholder” who normalizes and pushes the agenda of those privileged deviants.

I’ll be voting for someone other than Trump and DeSantis in the primary. The general election then will present the usual “choice” between two elite-preselected shitty alternatives that actually don’t much differ from one another on many vital federal issues (and I do NOT mean abortion). What does it matter anyway: It appears that the permanent state / bank / military / corporate complex will not “allow” the victory of whichever candidate they deem to pose the higher risk of effecting meaningful change for the American people.

They have a repulsive lifestyle which cannot be wished away.

A long time ago somebody told LBJ that such and such identity group maybe wasn’t a good fit in his proto rainbow coalition.

LBJ: well would you rather have them inside the tent pissing out or outside the tent pissing in?

Update 202*: would you rather have them inside pissing out or outside pissing in?

Donald the Fat: I want them in my house pissing all over everything. Make America golden showered for the first time evah!

Demoralized by the continued humiliation of Trump, conservative (self proclaimed) white man urges negro rapper as his political leader.

Because, ‘he drop troof boms on dem Joos.’

Sounds like the script writers nailed this one. We’ve descended well below Civic Nationalism.

Pull your head out of your ass. Actors all around.

http://mileswmathis.com/trump.pdf

It’s marketed and sold to Boobus Americanus as “Women’s Health” or “Right to control our health choices”, or “Our bodies, our choice”.

It is my impression that most Western women fall for this vacuous and illogical proposition. What about the human life, growing inside? That is removed out of conscious thought by thought suppression and repression, i.e., denial.

I believe in most cases that most fetuses can live outside the womb after about 7 1/2 months. If that is true, then that “thing” is a viable human being wholly constituted. So from this one must ask, how can anyone advocate abortion up to the full gestation period, 9 months, based solely on subjective preferences?

Importantly (I always look to analogy, parallels, and comparison to add meaning), how does a dog or cat have more rights (through Anti-cruelty Laws), than a fetus who has a hole drilled in his head and his body ripped apart so that he can be taken out in pieces? Of course the fetus feels pain and terror. He is being tortured in a way that a medieval torturer or executioner can admire.

To rationalize this for personal acceptance and absolving of inhumanity, homicide, murder, the assertion has to be made that the fetus is not a human being, which is illogical and casuistry.

I don’t vote but I do have preferences. These decisions for me are strictly and completely practical. Think of a loaf of something. Who is going to give you the biggest percentage of a whole loaf?

That would be an easy decision for me: Ron de Santis. He is completely competent, a unified personality, chooses excellent people, intelligent, has great integrity, and NEVER backs down.

Ideological purity is permanently on bypass with me. It either works or it doesn’t.

“We are fighting hard.”

No pun intended.

In my mind, I have given up on democracy, except for “weighted voting”, where defined criteria assign number of votes per person, from 1 to 5.

I have written about this in detail. To simplify, an idiot, criminal, scofflaw, bum, mentally ill (there are various degrees and a threshold), will not have the same number allotted as a hard working, positive contributor, and lawful and productive member of the society. Further, a test of general knowledge will be given to all prospective voters. Depending on the grade, the number of votes will correspondingly be allowed.

This will work 100% because the criteria mentioned can be changed and evolved at a given time.

I do NOT think the abortion issue lost elections for Republicans. It was the RINOs who left patriots dangling (especially here in Arizona) and widespread cheating by Dems (ditto.) That said, I favor a very restrictive, very early right to abortion, first 6 weeks only, entirely because of the possibility of rape and incest. There’s no way to restrict it to just those two conditions, because evil twats will accuse innocent men, likely getting pregnant on purpose to make a point.

Why the Hell does Trump capitalize Random Words in his Tweets?

Trump endorses abortion. Trump endorses the death-vax. Both are tiresome, but neither are important.

The good news is that his dingbat daughter and his malignant son-in-law have promised not to interfere in his second term.

I’ll support Trump in 2024 because should he be reelected 1) he will decapitate the Intelligence Community, 2) he will end US support for the war in Ukraine and 3) he will build the wall on the Southern border.

That’s enough for me. Kanye is a joke and is ignored by serious people. DeSantis will do neither 1 nor 2 nor 3.

I have waded through a good deal of nonsense to support the former president. If he is To have a second term, if the aurate, I will have to abstain from supporting him further.

No abortion was not the reason republicans had a poor showing. My guess is that a good part of the country breathed a sigh of relief that the country (even if secretly) has started to turn its back on murdering children in the womb.

Biut if he is to embrace the notion that same relational conduct has some key role in US life — and the country’s future — i don’t buy it. In an age in which the country needs to foster its own . . key in that is having children — a party celebrating a nonfamily producing ethos and practice is backwards.

And it hardly seems a practical way forward.

depressing . . . and probably a bridge too far for me.

Really depressing news.

I agree with all the essentials of your fine comment, and I hope that the new guy reads and learns something from it.

I differ only with respect to two points in your last paragraph. (1) The wisdom of the timing of the Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade. In brief, I was happy that the Court acted sooner rather than later. With the Biden administration having declared anal sex and child mutilation to be “values” that (((this country))) will go to war to enforce upon the world, it was encouraging that at least five or six highly placed men and women in Washington were prepared to put politics to one side and take an over-my-dead-body stance when it came to the moral and legal abomination that was the Roe decision. Besides, as no one can say with certainty that he will wake up tomorrow—that goes double for Supreme Court justices—I am glad that they struck while the iron was hot. (2) As I am fully persuaded that the vote counts in both 2020 and 2022 were totally dishonest, I think that nothing short of the summary execution of perhaps twenty thousand high- and mid-level Democratic Party officials would have changed the results. In other words, I don’t think that the Court’s action made a difference. The fix was in.

They have a repulsive lifestyle which cannot be wished away.

Yes, this is the bottom line. All the moral temporizing with sexual degeneracy simply must stop. A century’s worth of men and women succumbing to Jewish persuasion to be ever more “reasonable” and “tolerant” has led to this country’s becoming a police state run by depraved Jews.

In this matter, I favor extremism, and I favor expecting it—no, demanding it—from those who wish to get enough votes to rule us.*
_____
*Unfortunately, this begs the question of whether a nonfraudulent election will be possible in the foreseeable future.

Prior to the overturning of Roe v. Wade, abortion wasn’t a concrete issue for the one-issue pro-abortion voter — abortion was legal.

The entire comment is rubbish, but the quoted sentence is the silliest part of it.

Abortion is illegal in a maximum of 13 of the 50 states in this Jew-run excuse for a country. Anyone who says otherwise is a liar. The spread of infanticide—which I recently heard called “abortion’s logical extension” by someone who favors it—might, however, be briefly slowed by the Court’s decision. I certainly hope it will.

The SCOTUS decision DID NOT ban abortion. It simply gave it to the states to decide. The left lied during the campaign about it, and apparently the majority of the American people were too stupid to realize it, including Trump.

Nearly half of fertilized eggs fail to implant in the womb and are ejected from the body. Is this mass murder by God?

Further, an unfertilized egg can be brought to term by the process of parthenogenesis, resulting in a genetic clone of the mother. Therefore whenever a woman has her period she is aborting a potential person.

Perhaps with future technology women will be required to catch such aborted eggs, both fertilized and unfertilized, and deliver them to labs where the civil rights of all these eggs can be protected.

So, Andrew and Ye have entered the Alps through Venezia Airport? Good place to hide!

The reason DeSantis is a good candidate, and much better than Trump, is that he is a very good manager and governor and actually gets things done, plus he is bold and willing to take a stand on issues like when he went against the jewjab death vaxx agenda. He was the one governor who took pharma on and won, and saved the people of his state. So, of course, such rare wits and ability led to his sweeping win for gov again. People know he is on their side.

(((Note: yes I know DeSantis supports Israel, but no non-Zionist can win)))

Trump, on the other hand, is some kind of dunce bragging about warp speed of and untested thing, that ended up being of great harm, yet still brags about it. What an idiot and his base boos him at his rallies, and he still says it. Trump was a failure, and he let Fauci destroy his presidency, he let pharma harma the nation. Trump is a big showman and a failure as a manager, don’t forget all the neocons he appointed and how they turned on him.

Trump is still a danger to the republic because he may run on a third party ticket and spoil a sure win for DeSantis, Stossel’s election betting odds website has DeSantis way in the lead over all other potentials including Trump. The republicans alts are a big sack of losers like Neocon whores Haley and Pence and that gay Buttegg and the CIA nutball Pompeo who wants to drone Putin. DeSantis is the least of the neocohen warmongers, which is one big reason he is so liked.

Primaries DeSantis 50 over Trump 27
https://www.electionbettingodds.com/GOPPrimary2024.html

2024 final winner, DeSantis way in the lead
https://electionbettingodds.com/President2024.html

What Trump needs to do is go away and not be a sore loser. But Trump may not, because he is an actor in a Jew play, and he will destroy everything because his ego is out of control and he lacks the brains and integrity to actually make Amerika great. When Trump was on the throne he made Israel great and then Netanyahu stabbed him in the back. That shows great intelligence, lol.

Now with all of that said, Amerika is completely fucked regardless of who wins. Only some major collapse and internal revolution can lead to a Hitleresque personality who fingers the Jews and removes them from power. Trump is not that person, Trump is a big fat Jew lover, and thus is a big fat piece of shit wasting everyone’s time, like his latest ploy of trading cards and hosting gay fudge packing parties.

The real reason Amerika is 100% screwed is shown in this chart:
When Jewish population peaked in Russia, the Jews murdered the czar then went on a killing spree. But now most of the Jews in Russia are gone. Putin’s conscription sent many more fleeing for Israhell. I think there are less than 100,000 Jews in Russia, lucky for them.

The Jewish Agency for Israel, an international nonprofit organization, told The Media Line that since the conflict began on February 24, Israel has already welcomed 23,000 new immigrants from Russia and 13,000 from Ukraine.

Russia is free at last. And that makes them a tempting target, because when Jews flee your nation they want it destroyed to hide all of their crimes committed in that nation. One of the great misunderstandings in history is why Pharoah pursued Jews into the desert – because before they left they stole everything they could get their hands on.

This issue is a typical classic dog whistle shellgame suckerbet non-issue.

All you people who oppose abortion want to make it illegal.

But making it illegal doesn’t prevent abortion.

Paying women to have children does.

But that would be socialism.

Catch-22.

Thus, you fuckheads will be arguing forever over something you can never solve–because they want you arguing forever over this dumbass issue, because it is so lucrative for them.

The inability to see the forest for the trees is typical of all of you.

I sincerely think his job was to get most of his base injected with the experimental shot. He established credibility for three years that he was fighting the Deep State. He then used a fake insurrection as a cloud of dust to exit the scene. And now Trump is not even trying at this point.

That would be an easy decision for me: Ron de Santis. He is completely competent, a unified personality, chooses excellent people, intelligent, has great integrity, and NEVER backs down.

Desantis is a cuck.

https://www.jacksonville.com/story/news/politics/state/2019/06/04/desantis-defends-holding-florida-cabinet/4991318007/

https://www.fox13news.com/news/desantis-asks-to-replace-confederate-general-statue-with-one-of-civil-rights-leader

Trump will never have any kind of power again. He is irrelevant. A sad old shabbos clown the jews threw in the dustbin.

Or you could just change your name to A.A.A. Aardvark and start a blog.

As long as we only pay White women. And no, yids, you are not White.

It is a message from Q.

It appears to be photoshop, anon person plus Schwaubs head, but somebody dressed up like that !!!

The acid test is that its way too silly for a VIP to wear in public unless they were totally brain fried. there are some.

Maybe from a party on Eggsteins island. what happened there prob would boggle a sane persons mind. and disgust.

Because of Trump Democrats got everything they ever wanted. Makes you wonder.

You really can’t un-see something like this. I gotta go now…..

“They have a repulsive lifestyle which cannot be wished away.”

‘Yes, this is the bottom line.’

Good choice of words there, bud…

Wait, Trump is just another con man politician?!?

Who could ever have guessed.

It was legal everywhere, now it’s not – giving worry to individuals who want it legal and are concerned about those wanting abortions in states where it is illegal, and that it now can become illegal where they are at, if it isn’t already. So they make sure to get out and vote for the party who wants it legal – before, when it was a non-issue, they might not have cared who won or voted based upon other issues. It’s not a good issue for Republicans as all polling shows.

I do not think it is possible to have a legit election now that organized jewry has full command of every control point.

They have cheated repeatedly and gotten away with it, so why would they stop cheating?

We will be given the choice of voting for one shabbos goy versus another shabbos goy.

Gavin Newsome will probably be the next POTUS. He’s a shabbos goy on steroids.

I dono……too silly you say?

Like that star wars outfit he wears isn’t silly enough?

gathering dust in some Internet mothball metaphor out there

I am an indefatigable and relentless finder and embracer of metaphors and allegories, and I resemble that remark.

One of the world’s leading snow-safety experts once said that you can’t hold yourself out as an authority on avalanches unless you have actually been in an avalanche.

You can’t pay women enough to have children. We do it now,”fuckhead.” They still have multiple abortions anyway.
The inability of near-sighted imbeciles to see that forests are made up of particular trees will always cripple those like you who constantly fail to recognize that individual decisions lead inexorably to the building up or tearing down of a larger society.
Maybe you should consider volunteering for India’s first solo one-way mission to Mars.
Happy landing!

Trump played golf when he was President. He did very little apart from a huge tax cut for billionaires and moving the sign from the US Embassy in Tel Aviv to the US Consulate in Jerusalem. Also, he dropped some big bomb in Afghanistan. Big mouth Golfer.

That website seems… interesting to say the least. I’ve just clicked a few articles, the guy seems to think everything is staged or fake.

The fact they threw out the vote investigations is dispositive evidence of catastrophic fraud. If they had nothing to hide, they could have allowed someone to look.

P.S.

nothing short of the summary execution of perhaps twenty thousand high- and mid-level Democratic Party officials

Revenge is Sour: if someone had the power to execute them, they wouldn’t have dared to attempt the crime in the first place.

Fraudulent elections are not new. It is normal for legitimate votes in a Democracy to last 12-16 years at most.
They could have done this at any time, they a) didn’t see the need until 2020 and b) the optics are poor.

Only a finder? I’m a producer, including the untranslated Latin. Fiat vox veritatus, ruat caelum.

I do not think it is possible to have a legit election now that organized jewry has full command of every control point.

I fully agree with this and the two sentences that follow, barring something akin to a miracle. As for Newsome being the next designee, I suspect that you know a good deal more about him than I do, so my inclination is simply to accept your judgment. Apropos all of the Democratic and most of the Republican governors, I became enraged when the COVID hoax began and all of the former, including first Cuomo then Hochul here in New York, caved to Fauci and in some cases even doubled down. Since then, I have paid literally no attention to anything they say or do. Besides, at my age, extreme anger is a peril to life itself.

Nonetheless, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the Jews who press Biden’s buttons and change his diapers were working day and night to keep him in the chair for a second term. I mean, if Woodrow Wilson’s wife could act as president for the final two years of her hubby’s term, anything is possible.

Trump’s always played the holy rollers and the racists for the idiots they are. He’s a sophisticated New Yorker, far too urbane to actually take seriously the nonsense he has to spout to manipulate his base.

Trump lost in 2020.
The fact we are still talking about this loser means the US media AND alt media are just wasting our time.

you are not kicked off of here; and twitter sucks.

Kanye West is always wearing pedo-brand Balenciaga, beware!

Bro! that shit aint cool.

This pic needs to be on billboards, bus stops throughout the US-Europe.

Trump was always a degenerate. I voted for him anyway with nostrils firmly clamped, knowing full well that he was the best of a very bad lot of candidates.

Sounds like you need a safe space.

Maybe a teddy bear too.

I am not sure why Anglin is shilling for a stance that aligns with DoD Lawyer DeSantis’s campaign. Does the country need a DeNeocon President? Sane people say “NO!” to that idea.

Anglin’s style is pure hyperbole,

Why is he using hyperbole to support boots on the ground in Ukraine and Iran?

It is not his “style” that it at issue, it is his intent. Bashing Trump is 100% service to DeNeocon and starting more ‘Forever Wars‘. Would it not be more prudent to back the President with a proven track record of avoiding foreign wars?

Trump even refused sociopath Khamenei’s provocations and refused to be drawn into war.

PEACE 😇

Yes, and I could understand giving up on democracy, at least in the current system and society of “our” country the US, even with weighted voting.

Like many of my policy proposals, weighted voting is so far from politically feasible at this point, I’d be delighted just to pass these much less demanding laws:
‘
(1) every voter must present ID every time, and the poll worker must photoraphically record the ID used;

(2) only a blue US Citizen’s passport as acceptable proof of US citizenship, age, and place of residence

Direct the State Dep’t to provide passports for free, as they should anyway, as we need not pay to exercise our natural right to travel. Nobody can complain that they can’t afford the ID to vote, either.

(3) all in-person voting with very narrow exceptions for people deployed abroad in the military or certified by two MDs to be confined to the hospital or home with severe illness or injury;

And (4) ballots, voter guides, and all other materials only in English. When someone objects that people who aren’t proficient in English won’t be able to participate intelligently, the response is “good, that’s the point.”

Those measures would eliminate voting by illegal aliens, by “legal-resident” non-citizens, by people living outside the district, by people using unpurged dead voters’ names to vote again, and by people who cannot be bothered to learn our only traditional common language. If we can’t pass even these reforms for honest voting, let alone your intriguing weighted-voting idea, then elections present no hope.

At our polling place in LA, I always ask the poll worker how she knows I am who I say I am without ID. I ask how they know whether I’m a US citizen and that I live in the district. They never respond in a reasonable intelligent way and they often get confused, sometimes angry. One said to me last time “I know what you’re doing and I’ll call police if there is a problem.” I responded, yes let’s call the police and say that I demand to show my ID to prove that I am a citizen entitled to vote. We’re not even in the same reality and society as these people.

My best guess is that public opinion on abortion (sadly) has moved towards the pro-legal-murder position, meaning that the issue probably is hurting “pro-life” candidates in many places, and not just California and New York …

AND that there was again massive vote fraud (exactly what mass mail voting is designed for). Impossible to tell how much role each played in each Repub loss.

As for a six-week limit, I appreciate your point but I don’t think many women will know they’re pregnant in time to kill their babies “in time” under such a law.

Also, more important, innocent human beings shouldn’t be killed at any age or stage of development.

But realistic pro-life people should certainly accept a compromise prohibiting the killing of human beings after they reach a certain point in their development in utero, if that’s the best they can get in a particular state’s political climate.

In any event, the issue should be decided only at the state level per the Tenth Amendment and practical political considerations alike. (I’ll concede that most “Americans don’t know what the Tenth Amendment is and never did, and don’t care about its principle when it’s explained anyway. As long as their policy preference is imposed on 375 million people nationwide, they’re happy.)

That’s medical ignorance and an obviously illogical comparison.

Abortion does not kill a “potential person”, whatever that means. It kills an innocent human being that is genetically distinct from his/her parents, whom her parents chose to create (or risk creating), whose genetic essence and nature will never change. He/she will always be a human being.

The question then is, should we let some human beings kill other, innocent human beings on the premise that the victim hasn’t developed enough to be considered a person in the moral or legal sense. I say NO and you apparently, with ignorance of basic genetics and biology in hand, don’t even acknowledge that that’s the debate.

“The only reason I can’t suggest or recommend UNZ.com. Andrew Anglin. Beyond profane. Beyond bizarre. Put him behind a wall of some sort.”

We’ve just learned Telenon is likely a jew, where all uncomfortable or jarring speech can be labelled “hate speech” and “put behind a wall of some sort.”

I have a counter-offer: let’s put America’s jews behind a wall of some sort, and let the rest of us luxuriate in unencumbered free speech.

Why do (((they))) so mistrust the marketplace of ideas, and instead always go inexorably toward censorship?

So let me get this straight, gay men call themselves “Log Cabin Republicans”???

Is this some kind of word play with a double meaning?

How many logs can you stick inside a cabin?

The only way I imagine any win for republicans is when SHTF and ZOG needs someone to blame for the collapse of civilization.
Schitt is hitting the fan sooner than expected, it’s now not a matter of if or when, but how fatal will this extinction event be.

We’re already seeing signs of End of Days, feral black hoodrats murdering with impunity, massive debt, updated bio weapon strain released targeting dna specific groups, the boycott of Elons Twitter, Jew Israel returning under Zionist anti-White Goyim NuttandYahoo, Russia/Ukraine, GlobalHomo ad neausium…….

Wake me up when It’s all over.

If Anglin does not want Trump or DeNeocon, what serious candidate does he think can win?

He already told you. Anglin–

Here’s the thing: no Republican is going to win anyway, because the vote is rigged. Everyone knows this. What I care about right now is the platform of running for office. Basically, I want to see Ye talk about the Jews, and force this issue into the public discussion.

Aren’t you that petulant retard who always shovels shit for Israel?

The fact they threw out the vote investigations is dispositive evidence of catastrophic fraud. If they had nothing to hide, they could have allowed someone to look.

Agreed.

Revenge is Sour: if someone had the power to execute them, they wouldn’t have dared to attempt the crime in the first place.

Again, agreed. I was being hyperbolic. Besides, it seems plain that most of the Western world’s professional assassins are already on retainer or under long-term contract to DC’s dozen or so alphabet-soup agencies of enforcement and terror. Calls go straight to voicemail and are seldom returned.

So let me get this straight

Is this some kind of word play with a double meaning?

Just kidding – we know you’re a lady’s man.

Your comment is thoughtful and well considered. My proposal-in an ultimate and final sense-is the only real and lasting solution to this conundrum. If it cannot be effected within the structures of this society, then any other more modest reform is either unlikely to be implemented or must be established in a whole new milieu.

We are not that far from permanent schism and parting fault lines in these Joonighted States. I have proposed-as have Black and Brown (“Chicano”) “leaders” that inveigh against “systemic racism” and demand the solution and palliative: separate republics-self governing, integral, where once the White Supremacist are “off their backs”, their “Golden Age”, and unlimited potential can be unchained.

Just as in Judo-where the kinetic momentum is used against the adversary- so can this natural drive and movement be negotiated split, rather than a violent conflict with uncertain outcomes.

It might seem apparent that I have lost belief and interest with positive and meaningful reforms in this and any other Western country-including the Western Hemisphere. I’ve been around for a while and seen the world. As a project manager mechanical engineer, assessing resources, assists to complete projects is a process involving discipline, brutal honesty, and realism. Failures are usually writ large and are very consequential, as in loss of job and damage to real things.

Perhaps you’ll agree (perhaps you won’t) that the solution proposed 160 years ago by John Stuart Mill deals with your concerns about the limitations and dangers of voting and democracy and does so more simply and effectively than your own proposals do.

In Reflections on Representative Government (1861), Mill argued that those who received “public assistance” (“welfare” and other forms of governmental payouts) should be disfranchised for as long as they received tax-based financial support. The point, of course, is that anyone who is permitted to vote for a candidate who promises the voter that his payments will stay in place or be increased has, ipso facto, a conflict of interest: he gets to use the franchise to enrich himself by picking the pocket of his countrymen through taxation.

No member of the Democratic Party in more than a hundred years has greeted Mill’s proposal with approval. Indeed, the last politician I can recall even mentioning Mill’s name without denouncing it was Barry Goldwater—and that was sixty years ago.

The nightmare is just beginning in Brazil. Soros/Rothchild butt boy Lula has-like Biden-on the first day issued degrees to shut down shooing ranges and confiscation of all privately owned firearms; Bolsonaro had pushed through a law that made owning a firearm a right. In his previous term, Lula had pushed for total confiscation of all guns, in a referendum. Now, in our present times, he can’t be bothered with legal niceties. Just sign another illegal decree.

Lula, Biden, Obama, all “Leftists” in the West are just ventriloquists dummies. Nothing-and I mean nothing they say or do comes from their conscious. They are the messenger, the intermediary, totally under the control of the elite financial oligarchs of the World. It is important to remember that.

The modern nation state’s time has come and gone. Too big, too centralized, too irresponsible and irresponsive.

P.C., I am in complete agreement with that proposal, which is a subset and ancillary to my more enumerated plan. I consider that incomplete. The principle here is that the polity must be inhibited from “living at the expense of others”, unless the makers expressly approve of the resource transfer.

By adjustment and refinement of the requisites relating to weighted votes per individual, is that the criteria, basis, and outcome can be modified “on the fly” to insure that good composite decisions are made that will lead to harmony, fairness, maximal individual freedom, and the inhibition of evil and elements of failure.

Thanks P.M., something global is definitely being planned for all these world ZOG’s to be pushing the same reset agenda. I’m curious how this unfolds over the next few years or months. They can’t possibly get any stupider than the current regimes sacrificing their own for a seat at ZOG’s headquarters.

De Santis, in order to be in political office, has to made noises and genuflect toward the Jews. In fact, in the West, no politician today can get elected without some deference to Jews.

The reason is that Jews control nearly everything. The populace is shaped, molded, and controlled by a lifetime of indoctrination, intimidation, and isolation. Jews make up 30 per cent of contributions to the Republican Parties and 40 percent of the Democrats.

Cuckery, like most phenomena in the real world, has degrees. For a person already in office or power, to suck up to Jews that is not necessary is pure cuck. Ann Coulter, I believe, either created the term and used it very often in her books and columns.

On the other hand, if a candidate wants to get elected or appointed he will have to obtain some Jewish backing. That’s just the way it is. You can’t get everything you want when you want it, without flexibility.

LOL, shhhhhh, don’t blow my cover, I’m on a ‘To Be Cancelled’ list by those who cannot be named.

*Unfortunately, this begs the question of whether a nonfraudulent election will be possible in the foreseeable future.

Power comes from the barrel of a gun – Mao Tse Tung

Totally agree and the Jewish led left gaslit their voters over the impact of the SCOTUS case and led them to believe it banned abortion which they erroneously believe is a fundamental woman’s right. But where some Republicans really screwed up was in thinking the Dobbs decision have them a national mandate to ban abortion entirely. Pennsylvania gubernatorial candidate Doug Mastriano even went so far as to say he wanted to prosecute women who sought an abortion.

Obviously this gave the Democrats tons of fodder and they used his position to tar every Republican candidate, governor or other. Sadly, it worked good enough to almost prevent the Republicans from retaking the House.

You use your conclusion as your premise, which renders your argument empty (i.e. merely your say-so). And you ignore all the biological facts in my post.

I wish you were right. As someone strongly in favor of abortion – because it affords us a potentially powerful ‘demographic management’ tool – I have learned to my disappointment that arguing biology is a loser for the pro-choice side. I cannot recite all the arguments off the top of my head, but my impression is well-informed pro-lifers routinely dominate these debates. If it wasn’t for the individualistic emotional appeal of “a woman’s right to her own body,” I can’t see any way abortion would have been legalized.

A fetus doesn’t seem like a human being to me at all. And even though I have been unable to rebut arguments that it is, the fact that it’s supposedly a human has next to no emotional pull on me. It appears most people are not like me though. If they are convinced a fetus is human, their support for abortion shrivels.

Stuff homos like is ordinary retail politics nowadays. CIA’s preferred control mechanism has long been pedo stuff:

https://swprs.org/geopolitics-and-pedocriminality/

The way it works is in exclusive social events with a mildly transgressive atmosphere – drugs, orgies, etc. But CIA will give their target the special sauce for disinhibition and set them up with unweaned-infant fellatio, snuff stuff, or equivalent. So our prominent Unzites should imbibe with care in social settings. Look out for unexpected sticks or patches. Use the buddy system. The CIA regime is under siege and pulling out all stops.

This looks like an ad for homeschooling pic.twitter.com/AiMArqWRGM

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) January 3, 2023

Nah. Let’s just take up a collection and buy the fucker a comb. He doesn’t own one apparently.

The Supreme Court made the right decision on abortion by tossing the issue back to the states, where it should have been in the first place. Republican losses come in possibly due to some state legislatures being so adamant that won’t allow abortion under any circumstances. Unlike the 1970s, there are far less of the older generation around. Abortion was a hotter issue then than it is now. Even in the bluest of the blue New York, a Right to Life Party was started and it existed for many years. I think the GOP lost for other reasons rather than abortion. Most of those screaming the loudest were were the usual suspects : lesbians and well heeled professional white women who would never have gotten pregnant in the first place (for the most part). Regarding abortion, I always hear the term rape, incest, and health of the mother thrown around. Rape and incest are very shaming experiences, so I see the reluctance of a woman to report these to the authorities or even to a doctor. The “health of the mother” question can be twisted like a pretzel. Pro-abortion doctors will write up a report with phrasing that will make practically anything a danger to the mother’s health -primarily mental fragility. So in tangible terms, this is an almost useless requirement.

Trump was always clearly compromized. Never understood how any of you could support a man that was clearly being paid to perform a role. Trump never hid his disgust for the average American or worker.

I agree completely!

Outlawing all abortion is the only way Andrew Anglin will ever have a child.

The democrat Cultural Marxists don’t see it that way. They will never be satisfied as long as abortion isn’t legal in EVERY state. They might be stupid, but fanatical determination trumps legalities.

As I’ve said before, I’d rather have a republican majority in Congress (which we could have had) than die on the hill of abortion. The Dobbs decision will backfire in any case. When the democrats take full control of government (maybe in 2022), they will codify legal abortion into federal law. And laws trump SCOTUS decisions.

And thank God that they still harbor that fundamental decency and restraint.

For better or worse, the doctrine of judicial review as practiced throughout most of our history means precisely that court decisions can and do strike down statutes and regulations.

Of course, state legislatures, state police, state regulators, etc., can choose to ignore and non-enforce court decisions — enforcing instead the statutes or regulations that the court ruled unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. But sadly, that hasn’t happened much.

If you know rudimentary genetics, there is no debate whether the fetus is a human being. That cannot be changed by someone’s absurd religious doctrines and beliefs (i.e. most of them), nor do we need faith or hopes to be scientifically accurate.

Your position, rather, is that a genetically human being who is innocent of violence against others, nonetheless should be murdered if her/his mother wants her murdered, with the help of a “doctor” who hacks the human being apart. I say no, how cruel and wrong.

Use contraception or abstain, animals, or else provide for rather than murdering your own child.

Most Zygotes don’t take to implantation. The woman never knows it happened.

Is that violence? Who is causing the violence? God? Nature?

I’ll support Republicans and their stance on abortion when Republicans start adopting Black kids instead of paying 40k to adopt a Romanian. That needs to include Black kids with disabilities.

LINE ON UP REPUBLICANS

Show us how you don’t believe in race and treat all life as sacred.

Most Republicans are idiots. They seem to have forgotten that abortion was their key to getting Evangelicals to the polls. It isn’t going to work as well if it is banned.

Republicans are a joke. Just because I am an anti-leftist doesn’t mean I have to ally with them. I don’t see the point when they eventually give on any liberal social issue. They totally caved on gay marriage and they don’t have the balls to talk about tranny teenz. At the end of they day they are race denying boomers that are afraid of the left and just want to expand tax cuts before the ship sinks. Whoever called them comfortable losers had it right.

From an ideological point-of-view, abortion creates feminists, one of the most toxic elements in society. Steve Sailer has noted the ideological chasm between single and married women. The contorted faces of the harpies protesting the abortion decision mirrors the contorted souls within.

In addition to the points in my first post I’d add the following.

The pro-life people assume that a “person” begins at conception, even though an egg looks nothing like a person. Their logic is that a newborn infant looks almost like the fetus the day before, so the fetus is equivalent to the newborn. Then, the fetus two days earlier is almost the same as the fetus one day earlier, so the fetus two days earlier is equivalent to the newborn. By this logic, an egg 180 days earlier is equivalent to the newborn.

By this same logic, of equivalences over tiny changes, we can show that midnight is the same as noon. The problem with this logic is that while each tiny change may be insignificant, enough of them added up can be quite significant.

It is definitely true that a fertilized egg has the information needed to assemble a body from amino acids. This information, encoded in the genes, functions as a “blueprint” for assembling the amino acids into a body. But the blueprint for a building is not the building.

Also, the pro-life theory does not distinguish between the body and the soul/spirit. Contrary to the “life begins at conception” view, there is a lot of anecdotal evidence that our spirit is not created at the moment our body is conceived. Rather, that our spirit not only continues to exist after the body’s death, but also exists prior to its conception, and that after the body’s death the surviving spirit eventually reincarnates in another body. Numerous anecdotal instances of verified past life memories fit this theory.

In that context early termination of a pregnancy is not killing a spirit, which cannot be killed, but is requiring the spirit to wait for a later incarnation. It’s possible that in some situations such a delay would be in the best interests of the spirit. For example, it may save the spirit from coming into a situation with very poor prospects for a fulfilling life. Who would be best situated to make that decision on behalf of the waiting spirit? Certainly the woman who would be its mother would be among those closest to the situation and best able to assess it.

Also, some say the spirit waits until the new body is essentially ready for use before entering it. Until then it prefers the freedom and mobility of the spirit realm. And the last organ to be ready is the brain, which is the most essential for human experience.

If the government bans abortion on the assumption that a full human being, including the spirit, begins at the conception of the body, then that ban is based on a disputed religious theory. The Constitution prohibits any law that promotes a particular religious theory. Therefore such a law might possibly be considered unconstitutional.

It’s perhaps worth mentioning that the Bible, which has long discussions of murder, never mentions abortion, even in any of those discussions.

Let’s apply the same disenfranchisement to all federal government employees, both civilian and military. If they don’t like it, don’t join the thug “services” or that agency.

Since the men writing “the” bible had no special “authority” and it often makes no sense, I am not influenced by what it mentions or doesn’t mention. If the men who wrote the bible praised abortion or the “right” to choose to kill a human being in that way at that stage of development, I’d just conclude that they were cruel illogical people in that respect.

The men who wrote that book were mortal men with all our limitations, and they wrote in an era with painfully little scientific and medical knowledge of prenatal life and much else.

And no, nobody is in a position to judge “for” an innocent human being just starting his life, whether he would have a “good enough life” to warrant not killing him. That’s a rather sad and meanspirited argument.

I do, however, appreciate the quality of your writing, in all seriousness.

Also, the pro-life theory does not distinguish between the body and the soul/spirit. Contrary to the “life begins at conception” view, there is a lot of anecdotal evidence that our spirit is not created at the moment our body is conceived. Rather, that our spirit not only continues to exist after the body’s death, but also exists prior to its conception, and that after the body’s death the surviving spirit eventually reincarnates in another body. Numerous anecdotal instances of verified past life memories fit this theory.

Using your above rationale to justify abortion, why stop at the unborn baby? Down syndrome, poverty stricken, dwarfs, paraplegics, should all these humans be euthanized so they have a chance to live in a more comfortable body? Its almost like you are saying that it is in the best interest of an unborn baby to be cut up and vacuumed out of its sanctuary in the womb than be born to a woman who is not ready for motherhood.

It’s perhaps worth mentioning that the Bible, which has long discussions of murder, never mentions abortion, even in any of those discussions

The bible may not specifically condemn abortion, but John the Baptist recieved the Spirit while still in the womb.

Luke 1: 14 & 15

“He will be a joy and delight to you, and many will rejoice because of his birth, 15 for he will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even before he is born.”

And John the Baptist was referred to as a baby, while still in the womb.

Luke 1: 41

“When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, the baby leaped in her womb,”

Brutally dismembering babies in the womb is satanic and should not be sanctioned by a civilized society.

From an ideological point-of-view, abortion creates feminists, one of the most toxic elements in society. Steve Sailer has noted the ideological chasm between single and married women. The contorted faces of the harpies protesting the abortion decision mirrors the contorted souls within.

Abortion rallies attract the ugliest shills.

I have also seen lesbians at them.

I think the theory of feminism being driven by women that are barred from quality men makes the most sense.

It certainly explains these rallies and the blue haired shills that don’t have to worry about getting pregnant.

How many Black kids have you adopted?

Do you eat shrimp or lobster?

agree. re Anglin.

Ye is just a rappa nigga and nuts. Anglin and other probable WNs luv the niggas…like liberals doncha know. The Negro numinous, the freak, the sideshow, the negro talking English, sorta. Which is like the current fascination of white boys with the football negro dying right now of tantalizing violence. Or, look at jewboy potty-mouthed Gutfeld’s apeman with just one name Titus, or Tyrus….Behold planet of apes who can talk English. Fox News Jews.

The only virtue Anglin possesses is brevity.

So much zaniness here on this site. Given how nutty “we” are becoming right here, there is hope that Others are much nuttier and about to detonate. Joe Webb

Marriage is supposed to be between a man and a woman. Period.

How many Black kids have you adopted?

6 million

A man does not believe that women should be killing their babies, so this means he has to adopt kids?

Ye is just a rappa nigga and nuts. Anglin and other probable WNs luv the niggas…like liberals doncha know.

Is that the new Minnebonics?

A man does not believe that women should be killing their babies, so this means he has to adopt kids?

He should either have to support unwanted children or pay a disproportionate share for government social services.

Republicans support neither.

Christian conservatives that claim to have their positions based in Bible verses can stop eating shrimp and lobster before giving lectures on abortion.

The Bible is far more clear on that matter than 4 week abortions.

Christian conservatives will stuff their mouths with shrimp while talking about the sanctity of the fetus that they have no intention of supporting.

“These you may eat, of all that are in the waters. Everything in the waters that has fins and scales, whether in the seas or in the rivers, you may eat. But anything in the seas or the rivers that does not have fins and scales, of the swarming creatures in the waters and of the living creatures that are in the waters, is detestable to you. You shall regard them as detestable; you shall not eat any of their flesh, and you shall detest their carcasses. Everything in the waters that does not have fins and scales is detestable to you.

Leviticus 11:9-12

OT Bro.

There was a book that came out after that.

Having said all that, if the supreme court “justices” in the (pro-Tenth Amendment) majority were concerned about Republicans doing well on election night, they might have taken care to hold the decision until after that date.

True, but the Supreme Court has always reserved decisions like this until the end of June or early July when it adjourns for summer recess.

However, the draft of this decision was leaked to Politico in April and then published in early May.

This was an unprecedented, illegal, and egregious violation of the public trust by the Democrat partisan who did it. It’s been thoroughly proven that the leadership of the CIA and FBI are devoted hatchet men to the Democrats who are completely ruled by corrupt, evil One-World elitists. And now we see that the CIA/FBI have lowly-paid Kapos within the Supreme Court bureaucracy to do their bidding.

I am shocked (as much as Captain Renault in Casablanca) that the anonymous person who leaked this draft has not been identified and charged with a crime even though Supreme Court Justice John Roberts ordered an investigation into this on May 3, 2022. Just another example of our honest DOJ covering up another Democrat scandal (Hunter Biden, Seth Rich, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, et. al. ad infinitum.)

Thanks, Agree and LOL!

Poor JJ has no basic understanding of logic or anything he writes. It’s like listening to Al Sharpton speak. Just word salad.

OT Bro.

There was a book that came out after that.

Oh right the OT excuse.

As if no one preaches from it at church.

I grew up going to church and was told it was all the word of God.

Only when you start asking about shrimp or stoning rebels do you get the response of oh that’s the Old Testament as if they don’t still teach the kids that the flood happened or that a man lived in whale.

Poor JJ has no basic understanding of logic or anything he writes. It’s like listening to Al Sharpton speak. Just word salad.

I’ll break out the basic points for you:

1. The Bible states that eating shrimp is a sin

2. Christian conservatives oppose abortion

3. Christian conservatives oppose public health care for infants

4. Blacks are far more likely than other groups to get abortions

5. Christian Conservatives believe that opposing abortion has a Biblical basis but believe they can ignore Leviticus and eat shrimp

Which is statement is false?

‘5. Christian Conservatives believe that opposing abortion has a Biblical basis but believe they can ignore Leviticus and eat shrimp’

You need to get up to speed on your theology.

“Christian conservatives that claim to have their positions based in Bible verses can stop eating shrimp and lobster before giving lectures on abortion.
Christian conservatives will stuff their mouths with shrimp while talking about the sanctity of the fetus that they have no intention of supporting.
These you may eat, of all that are in the waters. Everything in the waters that has fins and scales, whether in the sea . . . Everything in the waters that does not have fins and scales is detestable to you.”
———-
You have an astute grasp of the politics regarding Ukraine. But on matters of faith and practice — not so much.

I can defend not murdering children in the womb without referencing scripture. A human beings existence, and development starts at conception. It’s really that simple. And the more advances made in neo natal care the more we learn that conception is the birth of a human being. In spite of technology rolling back the arbitrary standard of human existence starting at trimester — not a single law has been passed to adjust to those new realities.

Human life starts at conception. Opposing the murder of innocents does not require a reliance on scripture.

———–

And while the OT has great value in aiding one’s walk in life. It is not the rule book for christians. A christian can be so without a lick of knowledge of the old testament. But according to the new testament —

suffer not the little children . . .
what is done to the least of these . . .

are scriptural references that provide plenty of rationale to oppose the murder of children in the womb.

“He should either have to support unwanted children or pay a disproportionate share for government social services Republicans support neither.”

Ohhh not at all. The best way for citizens to avoid having unwanted children is abstain/be celibate from relations as noted by Christ. And short of that use prevention to stop conception. No men who opposing murdering children in the womb should not have to support the same. Though the apostles make reference to supporting orphans that is a mandate for the body of christ in general.
And they do. The body of christ runs orphanages and adoption agencies across the US. Those who should pay a disproportionate are those responsible for those children
1. first the mothers
2. fathers

but then that applies to fathers who wanted children. Further as tax payers believers already pay for the welfare system. That they oppose the prevention of unwanted children but should have to pay extra for that which they contend should be prevented in the first place —

no way.

Christians while branched to the promises are not jews.