World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Tue, Oct 25th, 2022 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

Effects of a 10-Minute Back Rub on Cardiovascular Responses in Healthy Subjects

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X0100006XCited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

    This study determined the cardiovascular responses to a 10-minute back rub. Twelve healthy, college-age males and females (mean age = 22 years) volunteered to participate as subjects. Using an ABA design, the subjects tested for 10 minutes (Control #1) on a padded plinth lying on one side. During the Treatment period, the back rub was administered, which was followed by Control #2. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was determined via the Medical Graphics CPX/D metabolic analyzer, which also estimated cardiac output (Q) using the CO2 rebreathing (equilibrium) method. A repreated measures ANOVA was performed to statistically compare the cardiovascular responses across the three periods. The back rub, when compared to Control #1, had no significant effect on VO2, but the central and peripheral components of VO2 were changed. Cardiac output was decreased as a result of the decreased stroke volume (SV), as a function of the increased peripheral vascular resistance (PVR). We also found an increase in the extraction of oxygen (a-vO2 diff) in the peripheral tissues. These results indicate that the VO2 response during the back rub was achieved by reciprocal central (SV,Q) and peripheral (a-vO2 diff) adjustemtns. Following the back rub, (i.e., Control #2 vs. Treatment), the decrease in VO2, VCO2, Ve, and a-vO2 diff appears to indicate that it was effective in inducing relaxation. Since HR, SV, and Q were unchanged, the VO2 response was result of the decreased a-vO2 diff. Hence, the findings certain positive implications for the health care industry.