Skip to main content

On the Influence of Social Bots in Online Protests

Preliminary Findings of a Mexican Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10047))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Social bots can affect online communication among humans. We study this phenomenon by focusing on #YaMeCanse, the most active protest hashtag in the history of Twitter in Mexico. Accounts using the hashtag are classified using the BotOrNot bot detection tool. Our preliminary analysis suggests that bots played a critical role in disrupting online communication about the protest movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. BBC News, Technology Section, Russian Twitter political protests ‘swamped by spam’, March 2012. http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-16108876

  2. Barberá, P., Wang, N., Bonneau, R., Jost, J.T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J., González-Bailón, S.: The critical periphery in the growth of social protests. PLoS ONE 10(11), e0143611 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chu, Z., Gianvecchio, S., Wang, H., Jajodia, S.: Detecting automation of Twitter accounts: are you a human, bot, or cyborg? IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput. 9(6), 811–824 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, E.M., Williams, J.R., Jones, C.A., Galbraith, R.A., Danforth, C.M., Dodds, P.S.: Sifting robotic from organic text: a natural language approach for detecting automation on Twitter. J. Comput. Sci. 16, 1–7 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, E.M., Jones, C.A., Williams, J.R., Kurti, A.N., Norotsky, M.C., Danforth, C.M., Dodds, P.S.: Vaporous marketing: uncovering pervasive electronic cigarette advertisements on Twitter. PLoS ONE 11, e0157304 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, C., Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: BotOrNot: a system to evaluate social bots. In: Developers Day Workshop at WWW Montreal (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dickerson, J.P., Kagan, V.: Using sentiment to detect bots on Twitter: are humans more opinionated than bots? In: Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Entwickelr.de.: Turkeys Twitter-Bot army and the politics of social media, Montag, WebMagazin, 30 Juni 2014. https://entwickler.de/online/webmagazin/turkeys-twitter-bot-army-and-the-politics-of-social-media-1153.html

  9. Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: The rise of social bots. Commun. ACM 59(7), 96–104 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gayo-Avello, D.: A meta-analysis of state-of-the-art electoral prediction from Twitter data. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 31(6), 649–679 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Freedom House. Freedom on the Net 2015. Privatizing Censorship, Eroding Privacy (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howard, P.N., Kollanyi, B.: Bots, #StrongerIn, and #Brexit: computational propaganda during the UK-EU Referendum. Available at SSRN 2798311 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. King, G., Pan, J., Roberts, M.E.: How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. http://j.mp/1Txxiz1

  14. Monroy-Hernandez, A.: The new war correspondents: the rise of civic media curation in urban warfare, pp. 1–10, December 2012

    Google Scholar 

  15. Porup, J.M.: How Mexican Twitter Bots Shut Down Dissent, Motherboard, 24 August 2015. http://motherboard.vice.com/read/how-mexican-twitter-bots-shut-down-dissent. Accessed 26 Jul 16

  16. Ver Steeg, G., Galstyan, A.: Information transfer in social media. In: WWW 2012 (2012). http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.2724

  17. Waskom, M.: Seaborn. https://github.com/mwaskom/seaborn

  18. Wooley, S.: Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics. First Monday 21(4), 4 April 2016. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/6161/5300. Accessed 4 Sep 2016

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank IPAM at UCLA and the organizers of the Cultural Analytics program, where this work was first conceived, for a wonderful working environment and for bringing diverse fields together. PSS is thankful to the Primrose Foundation for coding help. We thank Alberto Escorcia for collecting the tweet data and giving us access to it, and also Twitter for allowing access to data through their APIs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Suárez-Serrato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Suárez-Serrato, P., Roberts, M.E., Davis, C., Menczer, F. (2016). On the Influence of Social Bots in Online Protests. In: Spiro, E., Ahn, YY. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10047. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47874-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47874-6_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47873-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47874-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics