Volume 43, Issue 1 p. 155-163
Basic Science
Free to Read

The diagnostic properties of rheumatoid arthritis antibodies recognizing a cyclic citrullinated peptide

Gerard A. Schellekens

Gerard A. Schellekens

University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Hendrik Visser

Hendrik Visser

University Hospital Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Ben A. W. De Jong

Ben A. W. De Jong

University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Frank H. J. Van Den Hoogen

Frank H. J. Van Den Hoogen

University Hospital Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Johanna M. W. Hazes

Johanna M. W. Hazes

University Hospital Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Ferdinand C. Breedveld

Ferdinand C. Breedveld

University Hospital Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Walther J. Van Venrooij

Corresponding Author

Walther J. Van Venrooij

University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Department of Biochemistry, 161 University of Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The NetherlandsSearch for more papers by this author

Abstract

Objective

Since modern treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is shifting toward aggressive antirheumatic therapy in an early phase of the disease, diagnostic tests with high specificity are desirable. A new serologic test (anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide [anti-CCP] enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) was developed to determine the presence of antibodies directed toward citrullinated peptides, using a synthetic peptide designed for this purpose.

Methods

A cyclic peptide variant that contains deiminated arginine (citrulline) was designed and used as antigenic substrate in ELISA. Test parameters and diagnostic characteristics of the test were studied in patients with and without RA, in patients with various infectious diseases, and in a group of patients from an early arthritis clinic (EAC).

Results

Using prevalent RA and non-RA sera, the anti-CCP ELISA proved to be extremely specific (98%), with a reasonable sensitivity (68%). Also, in the EAC study group, the anti-CCP ELISA appeared to be highly specific for RA (96%). In comparison with the IgM rheumatoid factor (IgM-RF) ELISA, the anti-CCP ELISA had a significantly higher specificity (96% for CCP versus 91% for IgM-RF; P = 0.016) at optimal cut-off values. The sensitivity of both tests for RA was moderate: 48% and 54% for the anti-CCP ELISA and the IgM-RF ELISA, respectively (P = 0.36). Combination of the anti-CCP and the IgM-RF ELISAs resulted in a significantly higher positive predictive value of 91% (P = 0.013) and a slightly lower negative predictive value of 78% (P = 0.35) as compared with the use of the IgM-RF ELISA alone. The ability of the 2 tests performed at the first visit to predict erosive disease at 2 years of followup in RA patients was comparable (positive predictive value 91%).

Conclusion

The anti-CCP ELISA might be very useful for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in RA of recent onset.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me