Volume 147, Issue 9 p. 2373-2386
Cancer Epidemiology
Open Access

Blood markers of oxidative stress are strongly associated with poorer prognosis in colorectal cancer patients

Daniel Boakye

Corresponding Author

Daniel Boakye

Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

Correspondence

Hermann Brenner, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Email: [email protected]

Daniel Boakye, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Lina Jansen

Lina Jansen

Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Ben Schöttker

Ben Schöttker

Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Network of Aging Research, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Eugene H. J. M. Jansen

Eugene H. J. M. Jansen

Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Martin Schneider

Martin Schneider

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Niels Halama

Niels Halama

Division of Translational Immunotherapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Xin Gào

Xin Gào

Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Jenny Chang-Claude

Jenny Chang-Claude

Unit of Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Hoffmeister

Michael Hoffmeister

Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Hermann Brenner

Corresponding Author

Hermann Brenner

Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany

German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

Correspondence

Hermann Brenner, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Email: [email protected]

Daniel Boakye, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 April 2020
Citations: 26

Funding information: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant/Award Numbers: BR 1704/6-1, BR 1704/6-3, BR 1704/6-4, CH 117/1-1; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Grant/Award Numbers: 01ER0814, 01ER0815, 01ER1505A, 01ER1505B, 01KH0404; Ministry of Science, Research and Arts of Baden-Wuerttemberg

[Correction added on 2 December 2020, after first online publication: Daniel Boakye was designated as corresponding author].

Abstract

Oxidative stress has been implicated in the initiation of several cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Whether it also plays a role in CRC prognosis is unclear. We assessed the associations of two oxidative stress biomarkers (Diacron's reactive oxygen metabolites [d-ROMs] and total thiol level [TTL]) with CRC prognosis. CRC patients who were diagnosed in 2003 to 2012 and recruited into a population-based study in Germany (n = 3361) were followed for up to 6 years. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the associations of d-ROMs and TTL (measured from blood samples collected shortly after CRC diagnosis) with overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were estimated using multivariable Cox regression. Particularly pronounced associations of higher d-ROMs with lower survival were observed in stage IV patients, with patients in the highest (vs lowest) tertile having much lower OS (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.14-2.04) and DSS (HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.20-2.17). For TTL, strong inverse associations of TTL with mortality were observed within all stages. In patients of all stages, those in the highest (vs lowest) quintile had substantially higher OS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.38-0.62) and DSS (HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.39-0.69). The addition of these biomarkers to models that included age, sex, tumor stage and subsite significantly improved the prediction of CRC prognosis. The observed strong associations of higher d-ROMs and lower TTL levels with poorer prognosis even in stage IV patients suggest that oxidative stress contributes significantly to premature mortality in CRC patients and demonstrate a large potential of these biomarkers in enhancing the prediction of CRC prognosis beyond tumor stage.

Abstract

What's new?

Oxidative stress has been implicated in the initiation of several cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Whether oxidative stress also plays a role in CRC prognosis remains unclear, however. In this large CRC patient cohort study, higher reactive oxygen metabolites and lower total thiol levels were strongly associated with poorer prognosis. The addition of these biomarkers to models that included age, sex, tumor stage, and sub-site significantly improved the prediction of CRC prognosis. The findings suggest that oxidative stress contributes significantly to premature mortality in CRC patients and demonstrate the potential of these biomarkers in enhancing the prediction of CRC prognosis.

Abbreviations

  • BMI
  • body mass index
  • CCI
  • Charlson comorbidity index
  • CI
  • confidence interval
  • C-index
  • concordance index
  • CRC
  • colorectal cancer
  • DACHS
  • Darmkrebs: Chancen der Verhütung durch Screening
  • d-ROMs
  • Diacron's reactive oxygen metabolites
  • DSS
  • disease-specific survival
  • HR
  • hazard ratio
  • ICD
  • International Classification of Diseases
  • IQR
  • interquartile range
  • OS
  • overall survival
  • ROS
  • reactive oxygen species
  • TTL
  • total thiol level
  • U.Carr
  • Carratelli units
  • 1 BACKGROUND

    Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths, accounting for about 900 000 deaths per year globally.1 A wide range of factors including personal and lifestyle factors (eg, age, smoking) are associated with risk of several cancers, including CRC.2 These factors are also associated with oxidative stress,3 an imbalance in the formation and removal of reactive oxygen species (ROS),4 leading to damage of several biomolecules including DNA.5-7 ROS are by-products of cellular metabolism but can also be produced by immune cells (eg, phagocytic cells) during infections. Because oxidative stress could continue to cause damage to the DNA of cancer cells after tumor initiation or could affect tumor characteristics such as aggressiveness, it could play a role in CRC prognosis. However, data on the association of oxidative stress with CRC prognosis are sparse, likely due to difficulties in measuring ROS in the human body because of their short half-life.8

    Recent development of more stable methods for quantifying oxidative stress such as Diacron's reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs, an indirect evaluation of oxidant status by hydroperoxides) and total thiol level (TTL, a proxy measure of antioxidant status by free thiol groups) has strongly enhanced possibilities to evaluate the association of oxidative stress with health outcomes.9-11 Epidemiological studies have shown associations of blood d-ROMs levels with lung,12 breast,12 and colorectal cancer risk9, 12 and with cancer mortality in lung cancer patients.10 Higher TTL were also found to be associated with lower lung and breast cancer risk13 and mortality in the general population.11

    Whether these biomarkers also predict CRC prognosis is unclear. One small-sized study (n = 89) from Poland has investigated the associations of different oxidative stress biomarkers (8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2-deoxyguanosine and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine) with CRC prognosis and found lower survival in patients with higher levels of these biomarkers for oxidatively damaged DNA.14 However, the authors did not adjust for any of the known prognostic factors of CRC such as tumor stage. The aim of our study was to evaluate the association of oxidative stress, quantified by d-ROMs and TTL, with prognosis in a large cohort of CRC patients, paying particular attention to prognostic value beyond tumor stage and other known predictors of CRC prognosis.

    2 METHODS

    2.1 Study design and population

    Our analysis is based on data from CRC patients who were diagnosed in 2003-2012 and recruited into the DACHS (Darmkrebs: Chancen der Verhütung durch Screening) study. The DACHS study is a population-based case-control study in the Rhine-Neckar region of Germany, with additional regular follow-up of cases. Patients with first time diagnosis of CRC (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-10], codes C18-C20) and aged 30 years or older and physically able to participate in an interview lasting for about 1 hour were eligible. Patients were recruited from all 22 hospitals providing first-line treatment for CRC in the study region of about 2 million inhabitants. In the recruiting hospitals, eligible patients were informed about the study by their physicians and recruited either during or shortly after their hospital stay. Data from a population-based cancer registry indicate that about half of the eligible patients in the study region were recruited. There was also an age gradient, with higher rates of recruitment of younger patients, in whom comorbidities are often lower and chemo(radio)therapy administration and CRC survival rates are usually higher compared to older patients.15, 16 However, the DACHS study did not set an upper age limit, which has merits when aiming to assess the association of oxidative stress with CRC prognosis, as oxidative stress increases with age.11 Further details of the DACHS study have been described elsewhere.17, 18 The DACHS study was approved by the ethics committees of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University and the state medical boards of Baden-Wuerttemberg and Rhineland-Palatinate. All participants gave written informed consent.

    2.2 Inclusion criteria

    Our study population comprised all patients diagnosed in 2003-2012 who had data on either d-ROMs or TTL (n = 3730, 90%; Figure S1). Patients with poor hemolytic, icteric or lipemic serum samples and very low d-ROMs (<50 U.Carr) or TTL (<50 μmol/L) according to the manufacturer of the assays (n = 28), those who were not operated on for CRC (n = 50), those whose blood samples were taken within 3 days of CRC surgery or within 7 days of chemo(radio)therapy initiation (n = 141) and those with no information on tumor stage and other variables of interest (n = 150) were excluded. The cut-offs for CRC surgery and chemo(radio)therapy initiation were chosen based on reasoning, as surgery and chemo(radio)therapy are likely to have an immediate effect on d-ROMs and TTL levels. A total of 3361 patients were included in the analysis.

    2.3 Data collection

    At baseline (mostly during or shortly after hospital stay for CRC surgery), trained interviewers conducted personal interviews with the participants to collect information on lifestyle factors and medical history, using a standardized questionnaire. Tumor characteristics (eg, stage and subsite) and ICD-10 codes for comorbidities that were diagnosed either prior to or at the time of CRC diagnosis were abstracted from hospital records. We used the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI),19 adapted by Deyo et al,20 to quantify overall comorbidity as described elsewhere.15, 21 Patients were grouped into four groups, namely, CCI scores 0 (no comorbidity), 1, 2 or 3+ (severe comorbidity). Vital status and cause of death were ascertained from population registries and public health authorities about 3, 5 and 10 years after CRC diagnosis. About 3 years after CRC diagnosis, detailed information on treatment was collected from medical records and from questionnaires sent to patients’ oncologists.

    2.4 Ascertainment of oxidative stress biomarkers

    At baseline, blood samples were taken from patients (median time from diagnosis to blood sampling was 63 days, interquartile range [IQR], 23-270 days), from which serum aliquots were obtained and stored at −80°C until analysis for various measures, including d-ROMs and TTL. Whenever possible, patient recruitment and sample collection was prior to or shortly after CRC surgery and prior to chemo(radio)therapy initiation. Of patients receiving chemo(radio)therapy, approximately 40% had their samples collected prior to initiation of this treatment. Median frozen time was 7.9 (IQR, 5.8-10) years. A previous study suggests that d-ROMs and TTL have a good long-term stability under storage conditions of −80°C.22

    Samples were analyzed in two batches in the same laboratory and under similar conditions (70% in April, 2016 and 30% in June, 2016). Standardized assays that are used to measure d-ROMs and TTL (d-ROMs and SHp assay, respectively, both from Diacron, Grosseto, Italy) were adapted to an auto-analyzer (LX20-Pro, Beckman-Coulter, Woerden, The Netherlands) at the Laboratory for Health Protection Research (Bilthoven, The Netherlands). Of samples analyzed in the first 8 days, quality assessment showed comparable mean values, with no evidence of day-to-day variability. In brief, the d-ROMs assay evaluates the total hydroperoxide concentration in Carratelli Units (U.Carr). Each U.Carr is equivalent to 0.08 mg of hydrogen peroxide per 100 mL in the sample.23 The higher the U.Carr, the higher the level of oxidative stress. The SHp test is a spectrophotometric test which estimates the concentration of free thiol groups (eg, sulfhydryl groups) in serum in μmol/L using information on color intensity. Higher values indicate lower levels of oxidative stress.

    2.5 Statistical analysis

    The mean values of the biomarkers, especially TTL, differed by year of blood sampling. To address this, we calculated a z-score for each patient by subtracting the mean of each year of blood sampling from the value recorded for each patient and dividing by the SD of that year.24 This standardized the data such that the mean value of each year's sample was zero and the SD was one. We assessed the distributions of z scores of d-ROMs and TTL by baseline characteristics. ANOVA tests were used to test the mean differences, by adjusting for age and sex.

    The associations of z scores of d-ROMs and TTL (in quintiles) with overall survival (OS, mortality from any cause) and disease-specific survival (DSS, mortality from CRC) were investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression. d-ROMs and TTL violated the proportional hazards assumption, as their associations with survival outcomes became weaker after 6 years of follow-up. To address this, we censored patients at 6 years of follow-up (median follow-up time), as appropriate. Time was calculated from CRC diagnosis to the respective endpoints or end of follow-up, whichever occurred first. We also investigated the association of the TTL to d-ROMs ratio with OS and DSS. The TTL to d-ROMs ratio might reflect a balance between antioxidant and oxidant capacities and has recently been found to predict all-cause mortality more strongly than TTL or d-ROMs alone in patients with type II diabetes.25

    Two adjustment levels were applied: (a) adjustment for sex, age, tumor stage (Union for International Cancer Control, I-IV),26 tumor site, year of diagnosis, education level, smoking status, body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis, lifetime physical activity and alcohol consumption, vegetable and fruit consumption and time of blood draw with respect to CRC surgery and chemo(radio)therapy initiation, and (b) additional adjustment for comorbidity score. Results from model (b) were reported as main results and were also used to assess to what extent comorbidities explain the association between oxidative stress and CRC prognosis. All covariates were added to the models as categorical variables, as listed in Table 1 and Figures S2 andS3. We checked the proportional hazards assumption for all covariates, by assessing whether their interaction with follow-up time was statistically significant. Time-dependent covariates (interaction terms of BMI, year of diagnosis, and tumor site with follow-up time) were also added to the models because of violation of the proportional hazards assumption. We also accounted for left truncation by including “delayed entry time” in the models. In sensitivity analysis, we used the Fine and Gray method27 to account for competing events (mortality from causes other than CRC) in the association of the biomarkers with DSS. Also, in a subsample of patients diagnosed in 2003 to 2010 who were selected for tumor characterization (n = 1876, 77%), we furthermore assessed whether and to what extent the association of oxidative stress is partly explained or modified by microsatellite instability (MSI), a prognostic factor for CRC.28

    TABLE 1. Distribution of oxidative stress biomarkers according to baseline factors
    Baseline characteristics d-ROMs (n = 3237) Total thiol level (n = 3254)
    z scores (−4.03 to 4.26) z scores (−3.08 to 3.54)
    n Mean (SD) P n Mean (SD) P
    Sex
    Women 1290 0.24 (1.02) 1308 −0.07 (0.99)
    Men 1947 −0.16 (0.95) <.001 1946 0.05 (1.00) .001
    Age at diagnosis (years)
    30-59 660 −0.02 (1.06) 658 0.39 (1.06)
    60-69 1017 0.00 (1.00) 1026 0.08 (0.97)
    70-79 1083 −0.02 (0.98) 1083 −0.10 (0.93)
    ≥80 477 0.09 (0.95) .630 487 −0.48 (0.87) <.001
    Years of school education
    <10 2174 0.01 (1.00) 2181 −0.06 (0.99)
    10-11 569 0.03 (1.00) 577 0.08 (0.99)
    >11 494 −0.06 (1.00) .909 496 0.15 (1.04) <.001
    BMI at diagnosis (kg/m2)
    <18.5 63 0.05 (0.96) 64 −0.07 (0.97)
    18.5-24.9 1176 −0.02 (1.01) 1199 0.08 (1.04)
    25-29.9 1388 −0.04 (0.98) 1389 0.00 (0.99)
    ≥30 610 0.13 (1.00) .003 602 −0.14 (0.93) <.001
    Physical activity a (MET-h/wk)
    Q1 (3.3-115.0) 652 −0.06 (0.98) 650 0.02 (1.02)
    Q2 (115.1-165.6) 648 −0.02 (0.97) 652 0.05 (1.01)
    Q3 (165.7-215.9) 646 0.00 (1.03) 651 −0.02 (0.99)
    Q4 (216.0-295.1) 643 0.05 (1.02) 654 −0.01 (1.00)
    Q5 (295.2-788.2) 648 0.03 (0.99) .244 647 −0.05 (0.97) .389
    Smoking status
    Never 1309 0.05 (1.03) 1322 −0.08 (0.98)
    Former 1422 −0.09 (0.95) 1416 0.05 (0.99)
    Current 506 0.12 (1.02) <.001 516 0.08 (1.05) <.001
    Alcohol consumption a (g of ethanol per day)
    None 562 0.20 (1.08) 558 −0.10 (1.02)
    T1 (0.1-6.6) 885 0.06 (0.98) 901 −0.01 (1.01)
    T2 (6.7-19.9) 890 −0.08 (0.97) 897 0.02 (0.98)
    T3 (20.0-381.9) 900 −0.11 (0.96) <.001 898 0.05 (0.99) .030
    Vegetable intake
    <Once per day 481 −0.01 (1.02) 476 −0.09 (0.98)
    ≥Once per day 2756 0.00 (0.99) .790 2778 0.02 (1.00) .031
    Fruit intake
    <Once per day 1182 −0.01 (1.03) 1180 −0.04 (1.01)
    ≥Once per day 2055 0.01 (0.98) .550 2074 0.02 (0.99) .108
    Charlson comorbidity score
    0 (no comorbidity) 1861 −0.03 (1.00) 1874 0.13 (0.99)
    1 686 0.00 (0.98) 694 −0.07 (0.98)
    2 382 0.07 (1.07) 385 −0.19 (1.02)
    3+ (severe comorbidity) 308 0.10 (0.94) .074 301 −0.43 (0.89) <.001
    Tumor site
    Proximal colon 1100 0.00 (1.01) 1112 −0.03 (0.99)
    Distal colon b 1048 −0.03 (1.00) 1052 0.04 (0.99)
    Rectum 1089 0.02 (0.99) .488 1090 −0.01 (1.01) .169
    Tumor stage, UICC
    I 775 −0.10 (0.93) 774 0.16 (1.00)
    II 1009 −0.01 (1.02) 1006 0.04 (1.01)
    III 1041 −0.03 (0.98) 1063 −0.03 (0.99)
    IV 412 0.30 (1.08) <.001 411 −0.31 (0.91) <.001
    • Note: P values were calculated from one-way analysis of variance test and were adjusted for age and sex.
    • Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; d-ROMs, Diacron's reactive oxygen metabolites; MET-h/wk, metabolic equivalent task hour per week; Q, Quintile; SD, SD; T, Tertile; UICC, Union for International Cancer Control.
    • a Lifetime estimates.
    • b Including rectosigmoidal tumors.

    Subgroup analyses according to sex, age, comorbidity, smoking status, tumor stage and subsite, MSI status, chemo(radio)therapy use, time of blood sampling (tertiles of d-ROMs and TTL instead of quintiles were used because of small numbers) were performed. Here, we used backward selection to select covariates with P < .6 (defined a priori) for the models, but age, sex and stage were forced into the models. Potential variations of associations across subgroups defined by these variables were assessed with statistical tests for interaction. Stage-specific results were additionally illustrated with adjusted survival curves. We furthermore assessed potential linear associations of the biomarkers with all-cause mortality according tumor stage, using restricted cubic spline functions.29 Knots were placed at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted using different knot positions (eg, at 5th, 65th and 95th percentiles).

    Finally, we assessed whether and to what extent adding d-ROMs and TTL to models that included age, sex, tumor stage and tumor subsite improve the prediction of CRC prognosis, overall and by tumor stage using the Harrell's concordance index (C-index). Here, we created 1000 bootstrapped samples and trained the models in 2/3 of each of the samples (training set) and evaluated the predictive accuracy of the regression coefficients in the remaining 1/3 of the samples (validation set). The samples were split into training and validation sets using random sampling.

    The differences in the C-indexes of the two prediction models were tested for statistical significance using the “compareC” package in R (version 3.6.0). All other analyses were conducted with the SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Statistical tests were two-sided, with a significance level of 5%.

    3 RESULTS

    3.1 Characteristics of the study population

    A total of 3361 patients were included in the analysis (Figure S1). The median age was 69 (IQR, 62-76) years. About 24%, 31%, 32% and 13% of the patients were in stage I, II, III and IV, respectively. Of the analytic sample, 3237 and 3254 patients had data on d-ROMs and TTL, respectively. There was a weak negative correlation between d-ROMs and TTL (r = −.13; P < .001). Table 1 shows the distribution of mean z-scores of d-ROMs and TTL by baseline characteristics. d-ROMs were particularly high in women, obese patients, current smokers, those not consuming alcohol and stage IV patients. TTL was especially low in older and obese patients, those with severe comorbidities, and stage IV patients.

    d-ROMs and TTL levels also differed by time of blood sampling (Figures S2 and S3). For d-ROMs, mean z-score was highest among patients whose blood samples were taken within 2 to 8 weeks of CRC surgery. Among patients who received chemo(radio)therapy, d-ROMs levels were higher when blood samples were taken prior to rather than after initiation of such therapy. For TTL, levels were lowest within 2 weeks and highest more than 8 weeks from CRC surgery (mean z scores <−0.46 and >0.38, respectively). TTL was lowest when samples were taken before chemo(radio)therapy initiation (−0.32) and highest among patients with samples taken 5+ months after chemo(radio)therapy initiation (>0.31). Regarding time of blood sampling from CRC diagnosis, mean values of d-ROMs and TTL levels were similar to those reported for time of blood collection defined by CRC surgery (data not shown).

    3.2 Associations of oxidative stress biomarkers with CRC prognosis

    During a follow-up period of 6 years, 1078 (32%) deaths occurred, of which 708 (66%) were due to CRC. Table 2 shows hazard ratios (HRs) for the associations of d-ROMs, TTL and their ratio with CRC prognosis. In patients of all stages, those in the highest d-ROMs (vs lowest) quintile had 27% increased all-cause mortality, but this association was slightly attenuated and lost statistical significance after adjusting for comorbidities (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.99-1.48). Higher TTL was associated with substantially lower mortality. HRs for the second, third, fourth, and fifth quintiles, compared to the lowest quintile, were 0.92, 0.66, 0.58 and 0.48 for OS (P < .001) and 0.87, 0.58, 0.58 and 0.52 for DSS (P < .001). Even stronger associations were seen for the TTL to d-ROMs ratio. HRs for the second, third, fourth and fifth quintiles, compared to the lowest quintile, were 0.79, 0.59, 0.55 and 0.42 for OS (P < .001) and 0.72, 0.55, 0.56 and 0.49 for DSS (P < .001). In the competing risk models, the associations of higher levels of TTL and the TTL to d-ROMs ratio with lower CRC mortality were only slightly attenuated. Further adjustment for MSI status did not affect the observed associations (Table S1).

    TABLE 2. Associations of oxidative stress biomarkers with survival outcomes
    Marker Outcome z score quintiles (range) Cox model Fine and Gray a
    nevent/nat risk HR b (95% CI) HR c (95% CI) sHR c (95% CI)
    d-ROMs (n = 3237) OS Q1 (−4.03; −0.79) 175/647 1.00 1.00
    Q2 (−0.78; −0.24) 172/648 0.87 (0.70-1.07) 0.86 (0.70-1.07)
    Q3 (−0.23; 0.23) 193/647 1.00 (0.81-1.23) 0.95 (0.77-1.17)
    Q4 (0.24; 0.80) 231/648 1.08 (0.89-1.33) 1.04 (0.85-1.28)
    Q5 (0.81; 4.26) 269/647 1.27 (1.03-1.55) 1.21 (0.99-1.48)
    DSS Q1 (−4.03; −0.79) 119/647 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Q2 (−0.78; −0.24) 116/648 0.83 (0.64-1.08) 0.84 (0.64-1.08) 0.84 (0.66-1.07)
    Q3 (−0.23; 0.23) 117/647 0.84 (0.65-1.09) 0.83 (0.64-1.07) 0.82 (0.64-1.05)
    Q4 (0.24; 0.80) 147/648 0.88 (0.68-1.13) 0.87 (0.68-1.12) 0.90 (0.71-1.15)
    Q5 (0.81; 4.26) 185/647 1.10 (0.86-1.40) 1.08 (0.84-1.38) 1.05 (0.83-1.33)
    TTL (n = 3254) OS Q1 (−3.08; −0.92) 317/650 1.00 1.00
    Q2 (−0.91; −0.29) 251/651 0.87 (0.73-1.03) 0.92 (0.77-1.09)
    Q3 (−0.28; 0.26) 203/651 0.62 (0.51-0.74) 0.66 (0.55-0.80)
    Q4 (0.27; 0.87) 161/651 0.54 (0.44-0.67) 0.58 (0.47-0.71)
    Q5 (0.88; 3.54) 111/651 0.44 (0.35-0.56) 0.48 (0.38-0.62)
    DSS Q1 (−3.08; −0.92) 211/650 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Q2 (−0.91; −0.29) 159/651 0.85 (0.68-1.05) 0.87 (0.70–1.07) 0.90 (0.73-1.11)
    Q3 (−0.28; 0.26) 127/651 0.56 (0.45-0.71) 0.58 (0.46-0.73) 0.62 (0.50-0.78)
    Q4 (0.27; 0.87) 111/651 0.57 (0.45-0.73) 0.58 (0.45-0.74) 0.64 (0.51-0.82)
    Q5 (0.88; 3.54) 81/651 0.51 (0.38-0.68) 0.52 (0.39–0.69) 0.57 (0.43-0.75)
    TTL to d-ROMs ratio (n = 3130) OS Q1 (−1.86; −0.70) 313/626 1.00 1.00
    Q2 (−0.69; −0.34) 245/626 0.76 (0.64-0.90) 0.79 (0.66-0.94)
    Q3 (−0.33; 0.04) 184/626 0.56 (0.46-0.68) 0.59 (0.49-0.72)
    Q4 (0.05; 0.58) 162/626 0.51 (0.41-0.63) 0.55 (0.44-0.67)
    Q5 (0.59; 10.05) 101/626 0.38 (0.30-0.49) 0.42 (0.32-0.54)
    DSS Q1 (−1.86; −0.70) 206/626 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Q2 (−0.69; −0.34) 155/626 0.70 (0.57-0.87) 0.72 (0.58-0.89) 0.72 (0.59-0.89)
    Q3 (−0.33; 0.04) 118/626 0.54 (0.42-0.68) 0.55 (0.43-0.70) 0.60 (0.48-0.76)
    Q4 (0.05; 0.58) 113/626 0.55 (0.43-0.71) 0.56 (0.44-0.72) 0.59 (0.46-0.76)
    Q5 (0.59; 10.05) 73/626 0.47 (0.35-0.64) 0.49 (0.36-0.66) 0.54 (0.40-0.72)
    • Note: Statistically significant results are highlighted in bold.
    • Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; DSS, disease-specific survival; d-ROMs, Diacron's reactive oxygen metabolites; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; sHR, subdistribution hazard ratio; TTL, total thiol level.
    • a Results from the Fine and Gray model are accounted for competing events (number of events are different from those reported for the Cox models).
    • b Adjusted for age, sex, tumor stage, tumor site, year of diagnosis, years of school education, BMI, lifetime physical activity, smoking status, lifetime alcohol consumption, vegetable and fruit intake, time of blood draw according to chemo(radio)therapy initiation and according to CRC surgery, tumor site × log(time), year of diagnosis × log(time) and BMI × log(time).
    • c Further adjustment for Charlson comorbidity score.

    3.3 Subgroup analyses by tumor stage and subsite

    In stage-specific analyses, we observed significant associations between higher d-ROMs and poorer survival in stages I-II and IV but not in stage III (Table 3 and Figure 1). Compared to the lowest tertile, stage I-II (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.04-1.83) and IV patients (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.14-2.04) in the highest tertile had poorer OS. In stage IV patients, those in the highest (vs lowest) tertile had much poorer DSS (HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.20-2.17). For TTL (Table 3 and Figure 2), strong inverse associations of TTL with both all-cause and CRC mortality were observed within all stages, but the associations were particularly pronounced for stages I-II and IV (Pinteraction = .070 for OS). Even slightly stronger associations of higher TTL to d-ROMs ratio with lower all-cause and CRC mortality were seen within all stages, with particularly pronounced associations in stage IV patients (Pinteraction = .013 for OS; Table 3 and Figure 3).

    TABLE 3. Associations of oxidative stress biomarkers with survival outcomes stratified by tumor stage
    Subgroup Outcome Tertiles (z scores) d-ROMs TTL TTL to d-ROMs ratio
    nevent/nat risk HR a (95% CI) nevent/nat risk HR a (95% CI) nevent/nat risk HR a (95% CI)
    Pinteraction (OS, .728) Pinteraction (OS, .070) Pinteraction (OS, .013)
    Pinteraction (DSS, .538) Pinteraction (DSS, .517) Pinteraction (DSS, .228)
    Stages I-II OS Low 943 594 1.00 165/590 1.00 158/574 1.00
    Moderate 102/593 0.99 (0.74-1.31) 109/593 0.70 (0.54-0.90) 109/572 0.75 (0.57-0.98)
    High 142/597 1.38 (1.04–1.83) 61 597 0.48 (0.35-0.67) 54/571 0.42 (0.29-0.60)
    DSS Low 39/594 1.00 56/590 1.00 48/574 1.00
    Moderate 36/593 0.83 (0.52-1.32) 33/593 0.55 (0.35-0.89) 35/572 0.83 (0.51-1.34)
    High 39/597 0.79 (0.49-1.29) 27/597 0.54 (0.32-0.92) 27/571 0.73 (0.41-1.28)
    Stage III OS Low 114/343 1.00 161/353 1.00 157/336 1.00
    Moderate 109/349 0.86 (0.66-1.13) 108/356 0.68 (0.52-0.88) 99/338 0.62 (0.47-0.82)
    High 130/349 1.06 (0.80-1.40) 88/354 0.65 (0.48-0.89) 87/338 0.62 (0.45-0.84)
    Moderate 72/349 0.78 (0.56-1.08) 74/356 0.71 (0.51-0.97) 71/338 0.69 (0.50-0.96)
    High 88/349 0.90 (0.64-1.26) 68/354 0.72 (0.50-1.03) 64/338 0.69 (0.48-1.01)
    Stage IV OS Low 105/136 1.00 132/137 1.00 127/133 1.00
    Moderate 121/139 1.26 (0.96-1.66) 116/137 0.74 (0.55-0.98) 113/134 0.54 (0.40-0.73)
    High 124/137 1.52 (1.14–2.04) 103/137 0.49 (0.37-0.66) 101/134 0.46 (0.34-0.62)
    DSS Low 100/136 1.00 124/137 1.00 122/133 1.00
    Moderate 110/139 1.22 (0.92-1.63) 110/137 0.74 (0.55-0.99) 104/134 0.52 (0.38-0.70)
    High 119/137 1.61 (1.20–2.17) 96/137 0.49 (0.36-0.66) 95/134 0.45 (0.33-0.62)
    • Note: Statistically significant results are highlighted in bold.
    • Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; DSS, disease-specific survival; d-ROMs, Diacron's reactive oxygen metabolites; OS, overall survival; TTL, total thiol level.
    • a Adjusted for age, sex, tumor site, tumor site × log(time), year of diagnosis, year of diagnosis × log(time), time of blood draw according to chemo(radio)therapy initiation and according to CRC surgery, education level, BMI, BMI × log(time), lifetime physical activity, smoking status, lifetime alcohol consumption, vegetable and fruit intake and Charlson comorbidity score (backward selection of variables with P < .6; age and sex were forced into the models).
    Details are in the caption following the image
    Adjusted survival curves for the association of d-ROMs with all-cause mortality, overall and by tumor stage. Survival curves were adjusted for age, sex, tumor site, tumor site × log(time), year of diagnosis, year of diagnosis × log(time), time of blood draw according to chemo(radio)therapy initiation and according to colorectal cancer surgery, education level, BMI, BMI × log(time), lifetime physical activity, smoking status, lifetime alcohol consumption, vegetable and fruit intake and Charlson comorbidity score. BMI, body mass index; d-ROMs, Diacron's reactive oxygen metabolites [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
    Details are in the caption following the image
    Adjusted survival curves for the association of TTL with all-cause mortality, overall and by tumor stage. Survival curves were adjusted for age, sex, tumor site, tumor site × log(time), year of diagnosis, year of diagnosis × log(time), time of blood draw according to chemo(radio)therapy initiation and according to colorectal cancer surgery, education level, BMI, BMI × log(time), lifetime physical activity, smoking status, lifetime alcohol consumption, vegetable and fruit intake and Charlson comorbidity score. BMI, body mass index; TTL, total thiol level [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
    Details are in the caption following the image
    Adjusted survival curves for the association of TTL to d-ROMs ratio with all-cause mortality, overall and by tumor stage. Survival curves were adjusted for age, sex, tumor site, tumor site × log(time), year of diagnosis, year of diagnosis × log(time), time of blood draw according to chemo(radio)therapy initiation and according to colorectal cancer surgery, education level, BMI, BMI × log(time), lifetime physical activity, smoking status, lifetime alcohol consumption, vegetable and fruit intake, and Charlson comorbidity score. BMI, body mass index; d-ROMs, Diacron's reactive oxygen metabolites; TTL, total thiol level [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

    Figures S4 and S6 show stage-specific assessment of linear associations of d-ROMs and TTL with OS. For d-ROMs, nonlinear associations were observed in stages I-II and IV, with a steep increase in mortality for z-scores >0, which was especially strong for stage IV patients (Figure S4). A U-shaped association was observed in stage III, with a much higher mortality in patients having z scores <−1.0 or >1.0. A strong monotonic association between higher TTL and lower mortality was seen in all stages (Figure S5). For the TTL to d-ROMs ratio, nonlinear associations with OS were observed, with a much lower survival in patients having z-scores <0 (Figure S6). No significant interactions between the oxidative stress biomarkers and tumor subsite for the investigated survival outcomes were observed (data not shown).

    3.4 Subgroup analyses by sex, age, comorbidity, smoking status, MSI status and chemo(radio)therapy

    There was a significant interaction between d-ROMs and comorbidity for OS (Table S2). For example, higher d-ROMs (highest vs lowest tertile) were associated with poorer OS in patients without comorbidities (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.15-1.82), whereas no associations were seen in patients with comorbidities (Pinteraction = .037). For TTL, similarly higher OS with increasing TTL was seen across genders, comorbidity levels and smoking categories. The associations of TTL with survival were, however, restricted to patients aged <75 years (Pinteraction = .001). Subgroup analyses by MSI status (Table S3) showed particularly pronounced associations of higher d-ROMs levels with lower survival among MSI-high patients, with less clear patterns of TTL levels with survival among MSI-high patients. No significant interactions between the oxidative stress biomarkers and chemo(radio)therapy use (yes/no) for the investigated survival outcomes were observed in stage II-IV or II-III patients (data not shown).

    3.5 Subgroup analyses by time of blood sampling

    Comparable associations of d-ROMs and TTL with OS were seen across strata defined by time of blood sampling with respect to CRC surgery and chemo(radio)therapy initiation (Table S4). However, the associations of TTL with OS seemed weaker in recipients of chemo(radio)therapy whose blood samples were taken within 5 months of initiation of such treatment (Pinteraction = .001). Also, an inverse association between d-ROMs and all-cause mortality was seen in this patient group. But among patients receiving chemo(radio)therapy, there was no difference in all-cause (HR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.76-1.29) or CRC mortality (HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.78-1.39) between patients whose samples were taken after and before initiation of such treatment (data not shown).

    3.6 Added value of d-ROMs and TTL in the prediction of CRC prognosis

    Table 4 shows the C-indexes of models that included age, sex, tumor stage and site and those that additionally included d-ROMs and TTL. Results showed improvement in the prediction of CRC prognosis by the addition of d-ROMs and TTL in both the training and validation sets. Results from the validation set were very similar to those from the training set and the whole sample. In the whole study sample, the C-indexes of models with and without d-ROMs and TTL were 0.772 and 0.755 (P < .001) for OS and 0.832 and 0.823 (P < .001) for DSS, respectively. Stage-specific analyses similarly demonstrated superiority of the models with to those without d-ROMs and TTL in all stages and for both OS and DSS, with particularly pronounced improvements in stage IV patients. In stage IV patients, the C-indexes of models with and without d-ROMs and TTL were 0.615 and 0.566 (P = .001) for OS and 0.608 and 0.557 (P = .002) for DSS, respectively.

    TABLE 4. Comparison of discriminatory ability of prediction models with and without d-ROMs and TTL
    Outcomes Whole study sample Training set a Validation set a
    C index P C index diff C index diff
    Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
    All stages
    Overall survival 0.755 0.772 <.001 0.758 0.775 0.017 0.756 0.772 0.016
    Disease-specific 0.823 0.832 <.001 0.825 0.835 0.010 0.824 0.833 0.009
    Stages I-II
    Overall survival 0.683 0.715 .001 0.690 0.724 0.034 0.685 0.716 0.031
    Disease-specific 0.694 0.718 .046 0.709 0.738 0.029 0.693 0.718 0.025
    Stage III
    Overall survival 0.638 0.669 <.001 0.643 0.674 0.031 0.639 0.668 0.029
    Disease-specific 0.595 0.630 <.001 0.607 0.644 0.037 0.596 0.631 0.035
    Stage IV
    Overall survival 0.566 0.615 .001 0.580 0.625 0.045 0.564 0.614 0.050
    Disease-specific 0.557 0.608 .002 0.573 0.620 0.047 0.556 0.609 0.053
    • Note: Model 1 included age, sex, tumor stage and tumor site. Model 2: model 1 + d-ROMs and TTL (quintiles for patients of all stages and tertiles for stage-specific analyses).
    • Abbreviations: C index, Harrell's concordance index; diff, difference; d-ROMs, Diacron's reactive oxygen metabolites; TTL, total thiol level.
    • a 1000 bootstrapped samples were created and the models were trained in 2/3 of each of the samples (training set) and the predictive accuracy of the regression coefficients were assessed in the remaining 1/3 of the samples (validation set). Samples were split into training and validation sets using random sampling.

    4 DISCUSSION

    Oxidative stress has been implicated in the initiation of several cancers, including CRC. Whether it also plays a role in CRC prognosis is unclear. We estimated the associations of two oxidative stress biomarkers (d-ROMs and TTL) with CRC prognosis. We found particularly poorer survival in stage IV patients with higher levels of d-ROMs. We also observed strong monotonic associations between TTL and survival within all stages, and the ratio of TTL and d-ROMs was even a stronger predictor of CRC prognosis than TTL alone. The addition of d-ROMs and TTL to prognostic models that included age, sex, tumor stage and subsite, moreover, significantly improved the prediction of CRC prognosis, overall and within all stages, with improvements being particularly pronounced in stage IV patients.

    Several previous studies have reported associations of oxidative stress with poorer prognosis for patients with other types of cancer. For example, higher d-ROMs were found to be associated with poorer OS in patients with follicular lymphoma30 and lung cancer.10 Higher TTL was also found to be associated with higher OS in lung cancer patients.31 Whether these biomarkers also predict CRC prognosis has been unclear. To the best of our knowledge, only one small-sized study has assessed the associations of different oxidative stress biomarkers (8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2-deoxyguanosine and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine) with CRC prognosis.14 The authors found poorer OS in patients with higher levels of these biomarkers, but they did not adjust for any of the known predictors of CRC prognosis such as tumor stage, age and comorbidities.

    Results from our large patient cohort, which were adjusted for a large number of relevant factors including tumor stage, comorbidities and time of blood sampling with respect to surgery and chemo(radio)therapy initiation, showed poorer prognosis in patients with higher d-ROMs and lower TTL. Stage-specific analyses demonstrated particularly pronounced associations in stage IV patients. These findings suggest that an imbalanced redox state might play a major role in premature mortality in CRC patients. This hypothesis is further supported by the particularly pronounced association between the TTL to d-ROMs ratio, which reflects the balance between redox control and oxidative stress, and survival. To the best of our knowledge, our study was the first to assess this association in a cancer cohort. The finding that the addition of these biomarkers to models that included age, sex, tumor stage and subsite significantly improves the prediction of CRC in patients of all stages and within all stages suggests that these biomarkers might also provide useful information for risk stratification of CRC patients beyond tumor stage at diagnosis.

    There are several possible mechanisms through which oxidative stress might be related to CRC prognosis. First, besides tumor initiation, oxidative stress might also be involved in tumor promotion and progression. For example, cellular hypoxia is common in highly proliferating cells and induces mitochondrial ROS.32 Elevated ROS in turn stimulates chronic inflammation and maintains telomerase activity of tumor cells,33 leading to chemo(radio)resistance and increased survival of tumor cells.32, 34 Higher d-ROMs and lower TTL might thus in part reflect proliferative activity of the tumor. Second, oxidative stress has been implicated in the aging process, possibly through telomere erosion and cell senescence.35 For example, we found lower TTL and weak associations of TTL with survival in older patients, suggesting that the low TTL levels in this age group might primarily reflect the aging process. Third, it is possible that the association of oxidative stress with poorer prognosis in CRC patients is modified or partly explained by comorbidity, a prognostic factor of CRC.36, 37 Although we adjusted for comorbidities in our analysis, we cannot exclude residual confounding by comorbidities or by unmeasured factors such as frailty. The observed strong associations persisting within tumor stages and across several patient subgroups are, however, unlikely to be due to just confounding. Another possible mechanism by which oxidative stress may impact survival is modification by DNA methylation, which has been suggested for other cancers, such as prostate cancer.38

    Because endogenous antioxidants (eg, glutathione) play important roles in detoxifying ROS,35 it has been hypothesized that exogenous supplements (eg, vitamin C) might also help scavenge free radicals. The potential for vitamin supplementation to correct redox imbalance has, however, not been demonstrated in clinical trials.39, 40 Data from clinical trials suggest that regular consumption of vegetables and fruits might lower ROS.40 Given that an unhealthy lifestyle is associated with oxidative stress11, 41 and worse health outcomes (eg, risk of long-term conditions and mortality), the adoption of a healthy lifestyle (eg, regular physical activity and smoking cessation) rather than just vitamin supplementation might help to achieve a balanced redox state and thereby also enhance CRC prognosis.

    Our study has limitations. First, we excluded patients lacking information on the measured biomarkers, which could have led to selection bias. However, it is worth mentioning that the excluded sample was small (n = 310, 8%) and was not different from the included sample in terms of age (mean 69.8 vs 68.3 years) but included a somewhat lower proportion of stage IV patients (13.6% vs 19%). Second, even though d-ROMs and TTL were quantified using standardized methods, their levels might be affected by surgery or chemo(radio)therapy administration.42 We made efforts to address this by excluding patients whose blood samples were taken <4 days after CRC surgery or <8 days after chemo(radio)therapy initiation and by also adjusting for time of blood sampling in our multivariable analysis. Even though no uniform timing of recruitment and blood sampling could be realized in this population-based study, our subgroup analysis of the associations of the biomarkers by time of blood sampling might provide useful information on the appropriate time for blood sampling for evaluation of oxidative stress biomarkers. Future studies should determine the most appropriate time point for blood sample collection for assessment of oxidative stress biomarkers. Third, it has been suggested that the d-ROMs assay also assesses non-ROMs such as ceruloplasmin and that some serum components (eg, thiols and albumin) might reduce lipid hydroperoxides levels,43 which might affect the accuracy of our d-ROMs measurement. However, regardless of uncertainties in the measurement of d-ROMs, previous studies using serum samples to estimate d-ROMs have similarly found associations between higher d-ROMs levels and increased mortality in other cancer types, including follicular lymphoma30 and lung cancer.10 Finally, our preliminary analyses suggested that the associations of d-ROMs and TTL with CRC prognosis might be weaker for patients with >6 years of follow-up. This suggests that it might not be possible for a one-time measurement of oxidative stress to be used for predicting CRC outcomes after longer follow-up (eg, 10+ years). We addressed this by censoring patients at 6 years of follow-up.

    Major strengths of our study include recruitment of patients in a population-based setting, the use of prospective design and large sample size. Also, we were able to adjust for a large number of relevant factors such as tumor stage, age, comorbidities, and time of blood draw according to CRC surgery and chemo(radio)therapy initiation (which also takes into account whether or not a patient used CRC treatments). In particular, we were able to conduct subgroup analyses according to tumor stage, age, comorbidities, MSI status and chemo(radio)therapy use, which might be useful in understanding to what extent oxidative stress impacts CRC prognosis in specific patient groups. Also, results from the stage-specific analyses and from the assessment of the predictive accuracy of prognostic models with and without the measured oxidative stress biomarkers provide evidence on the potential for these biomarkers in enhancing risk stratification of CRC patients beyond tumor stage.

    In conclusion, higher d-ROMs and lower TTL levels were associated with substantially poorer prognosis in CRC patients, including stage IV patients, in this large population-based study. These findings suggest that an imbalanced redox state might contribute significantly to premature mortality in CRC patients. Regardless of uncertainties on to what extent the observed associations reflect causality, the measured biomarkers may help to refine the prediction of prognosis beyond tumor stage at diagnosis, the by far most important prognostic factor in CRC patients. Future research should address if and to what extent such information could also be useful to inform treatment decisions or for monitoring treatment success in CRC patients.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    We would like to thank Ute Handte-Daub, Ansgar Brandhorst, Petra Bächer and Piet Beekhof for their excellent technical assistance. We are particularly grateful to the study participants, as well as the interviewers who assisted in the data collection. We also gratefully appreciate the cooperation of the below-listed clinics and institutions: Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Klinik am Gesundbrunnen Heilbronn, St. Vincentiuskrankenhaus Speyer, St. Josefskrankenhaus Heidelberg, Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Mannheim, Diakonissenkrankenhaus Speyer, Krankenhaus Salem Heidelberg, Kreiskrankenhaus Schwetzingen, St. Marienkrankenhaus Ludwigshafen, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Stadtklinik Frankenthal, Diakoniekrankenhaus Mannheim, Kreiskrankenhaus Sinsheim, Klinikum am Plattenwald Bad Friedrichshall, Kreiskrankenhaus Weinheim, Kreiskrankenhaus Eberbach, Kreiskrankenhaus Buchen, Kreiskrankenhaus Mosbach, Enddarmzentrum Mannheim, Kreiskrankenhaus Brackenheim and Cancer Registry of Rhineland-Palatinate, Mainz. This work was supported by grants from the German Research Council (BR 1704/6-1, BR 1704/6-3, BR 1704/6-4, CH 117/1-1); German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01KH0404, 01ER0814, 01ER0815, 01ER1505A, 01ER1505B); and the Ministry of Science, Research and Arts of Baden-Wuerttemberg. The funding bodies had no role in the design, performance of analysis or the decision to publish our study.

      CONFLICT OF INTEREST

      The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

      DATA ACCESSIBILITY

      The data supporting findings from our study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

      ETHICS STATEMENT

      The DACHS study was approved by the ethics committees of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University and the state medical boards of Baden-Wuerttemberg and Rhineland-Palatinate. All participants gave written informed consent.

        The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.